Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Quantitative measurement of transcriptional inhibition and mutagenesis induced by site-specifically incorporated DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo

Abstract

Aberrant transcription induced by DNA damage may confer risk for the development of cancer and other human diseases. Traditional methods for measuring lesion-induced transcriptional alterations often involve extensive colony screening and DNA sequencing procedures. Here we describe a protocol for the quantitative assessment of the effects of DNA lesions on the efficiency and fidelity of transcription in vitro and in mammalian cells. The method is also amenable to investigating the influence of specific DNA repair proteins on the biological response toward DNA damage during transcription by manipulating their gene expression. Specifically, we present detailed, step-by-step procedures, including DNA template preparation, in vitro and in vivo transcription, RNA purification, reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and restriction digestion of RT-PCR products. Analyses of restriction fragments of interest are performed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). The entire procedure described in this protocol can be completed in 15–20 d.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A schematic diagram illustrating the CTAB assay system.
Figure 2: Chemical structures of N3-CMdT, O4-CMdT and dT.
Figure 3: Construction of lesion-bearing plasmids.
Figure 4: The parent vector and competitor vector used in this study.
Figure 5: Transcriptional alterations induced by N3-CMdT and O4-CMdT.
Figure 6: PAGE analysis for determining the effects of DNA lesions on transcription.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bregeon, D. & Doetsch, P.W. Transcriptional mutagenesis: causes and involvement in tumour development. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 218–227 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morreall, J.F., Petrova, L. & Doetsch, P.W. Transcriptional mutagenesis and its potential roles in the etiology of cancer and bacterial antibiotic resistance. J. Cell Physiol. 228, 2257–2261 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaillard, H., Herrera-Moyano, E. & Aguilera, A. Transcription-associated genome instability. Chem. Rev. 113, 8638–8661 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lange, S.S., Takata, K. & Wood, R.D. DNA polymerases and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 96–110 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sale, J.E., Lehmann, A.R. & Woodgate, R. Y-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 141–152 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saxowsky, T.T. & Doetsch, P.W. RNA polymerase encounters with DNA damage: transcription-coupled repair or transcriptional mutagenesis? Chem. Rev. 106, 474–488 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuraoka, I. & Tanaka, K. Assays for transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II using oligo(dC)-tailed template with single DNA damage. Methods Enzymol. 408, 214–223 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. You, C. et al. A quantitative assay for assessing the effects of DNA lesions on transcription. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 817–822 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Delaney, J.C. & Essigmann, J.M. Assays for determining lesion bypass efficiency and mutagenicity of site-specific DNA lesions in vivo. Methods Enzymol. 408, 1–15 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frick, L.E., Delaney, J.C., Wong, C., Drennan, C.L. & Essigmann, J.M. Alleviation of 1,N6-ethanoadenine genotoxicity by the Escherichia coli adaptive response protein AlkB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 755–760 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong, H.Z., Cao, H.C. & Wang, Y.S. Formation and genotoxicity of a guanine-cytosine intrastrand cross-link lesion in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 7118–7127 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan, B.F., Cao, H.C., Jiang, Y., Hong, H.Z. & Wang, Y.S. Efficient and accurate bypass of N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-2′-deoxyguanosine by DinB DNA polymerase in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 8679–8684 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. You, C., Dai, X., Yuan, B. & Wang, Y. Effects of 6-thioguanine and S6-methylthioguanine on transcription in vitro and in human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 40915–40923 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. You, C., Wang, P., Dai, X. & Wang, Y. Transcriptional bypass of regioisomeric ethylated thymidine lesions by T7 RNA polymerase and human RNA polymerase II. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 13706–13713 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. You, C., Wang, J., Dai, X. & Wang, Y. Transcriptional inhibition and mutagenesis induced by N-nitroso compound-derived carboxymethylated thymidine adducts in DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 1012–1018 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. You, C., Ji, D., Dai, X. & Wang, Y. Effects of Tet-mediated oxidation products of 5-methylcytosine on DNA transcription in vitro and in mammalian cells. Sci. Rep. 4, 7052 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, J. & Wang, Y. Chemical synthesis of oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing N3- and O4-carboxymethylthymidine and their formation in DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 336–345 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagel, Z.D. et al. Multiplexed DNA repair assays for multiple lesions and multiple doses via transcription inhibition and transcriptional mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E1823–E1832 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rizzo, J.M. & Buck, M.J. Key principles and clinical applications of 'next-generation' DNA sequencing. Cancer Prev. Res. 5, 887–900 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Baker, D. et al. Nucleotide excision repair eliminates unique DNA-protein cross-links from mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 22592–22604 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Luhnsdorf, B. et al. Generation of reporter plasmids containing defined base modifications in the DNA strand of choice. Anal. Biochem. 425, 47–53 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, H. & Hays, J.B. Simple and rapid preparation of gapped plasmid DNA for incorporation of oligomers containing specific DNA lesions. Mol. Biotechnol. 19, 133–140 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kitsera, N. et al. 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in DNA does not constitute a barrier to transcription, but is converted into transcription-blocking damage by OGG1. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 5926–5934 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bregeon, D., Peignon, P.A. & Sarasin, A. Transcriptional mutagenesis induced by 8-oxoguanine in mammalian cells. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000577 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bregeon, D. & Doetsch, P.W. Reliable method for generating double-stranded DNA vectors containing site-specific base modifications. BioTechniques 37, 760–762, 764, 766 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Enoiu, M., Ho, T.V., Long, D.T., Walter, J.C. & Scharer, O.D. Construction of plasmids containing site-specific DNA interstrand cross-links for biochemical and cell biological studies. Methods Mol. Biol. 920, 203–219 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Edelheit, O., Hanukoglu, A. & Hanukoglu, I. Simple and efficient site-directed mutagenesis using two single-primer reactions in parallel to generate mutants for protein structure-function studies. BMC Biotechnol. 9, 61 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bomgarden, R. et al. Opposing effects of the UV lesion repair protein XPA and UV bypass polymerase eta on ATR checkpoint signaling. EMBO J. 25, 5036–5036 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chowdhury, G. & Guengerich, F. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of DNA polymerase reaction products. Curr. Protoc. Nucleic Acid Chem. 47, 7.16.1–7.16.11 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge T.R. O'Connor (The City of Hope) and K.A. Cimprich (Stanford University) for kindly providing the initial pTGFP-Hha10 vector and human fibroblast cells (XP12RO and GM15876A), respectively. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health (R01DK082779, R01ES019873, R01 ES025121 and R01CA101864 to Y.W.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.Y. designed and performed the research and wrote the manuscript. Y.W. designed and supervised the research and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinsheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

You, C., Wang, Y. Quantitative measurement of transcriptional inhibition and mutagenesis induced by site-specifically incorporated DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Nat Protoc 10, 1389–1406 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.094

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.094

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing