Abstract

Transition metal dichalcogenides are optically active, layered materials promising for fast optoelectronics and on-chip photonics. We demonstrate electrically driven single-photon emission from localized sites in tungsten diselenide and tungsten disulphide. To achieve this, we fabricate a light-emitting diode structure comprising single-layer graphene, thin hexagonal boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenide mono- and bi-layers. Photon correlation measurements are used to confirm the single-photon nature of the spectrally sharp emission. These results present the transition metal dichalcogenide family as a platform for hybrid, broadband, atomically precise quantum photonics devices.

Introduction

Incorporating single-photon sources into optoelectronic circuits is a key challenge to develop scalable quantum-photonic technologies. Despite a plethora of single-photon sources reported to-date, all-electrical operation, desired for systems integration, is reported for only a few1,2,3,4. Layered materials (LMs) offer novel opportunities for next-generation photonic and optoelectronic technologies5,6, such as lasers7,8, modulators9,10 and photodetectors11, and are compatible with the silicon platform12.

The attractiveness of single-photon sources in LMs13,14,15,16,17,18 stems from their ability to operate at the fundamental limit of few-atom thickness, providing the potential to integrate into conventional and scalable high-speed optoelectronic systems19,20. Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), being optically active layered semiconductors, are particularly suitable for developing quantum-light generating devices.

Here we demonstrate that LMs enable all-electrical single-photon generation over a broad spectrum. We use a light-emitting diode (LED) realized by vertical stacking of LMs and achieve charge injection into the active layer containing quantum emitters. We show that quantum emitters in tungsten diselenide (WSe2)13,14,15,16,17 can operate electrically. We further report all-electrical single-photon generation in the visible spectrum from a new class of quantum emitters in tungsten disulfide (WS2). Our results highlight the promise of LMs as a new platform for broadband hybrid all-integrated quantum-photonic circuits.

Results

Design and operation of a vertical TMD-based LED

We realize an LED based on a single tunnelling junction made of vertically stacked LMs (see ‘Methods’, Supplementary Figs 1–8 and Supplementary Notes 1–3). Figure 1a is a typical optical microscope image of such a device. From bottom to top, three layers form a heterostructure on a silicon/silicon dioxide (Si/SiO2) substrate: a single layer of graphene (SLG), a thin (2–6 atomic layers) sheet of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) and a mono- or bi-layer of TMD, such as WSe2. The WSe2, exfoliated from a naturally p-doped bulk crystal, is the optically active layer hosting single-photon sources. Metal electrodes provide electrical contact to the SLG and TMD layers. To obtain electroluminescence (EL), we inject electrons from the SLG to the p-doped WSe2 through the hBN tunnel barrier (see Supplementary Fig. 9 for current–voltage characteristics of the devices). A vertically stacked heterojunction allows for EL from the whole device area, unlike lateral Schottky junction or split-gate p–n junction devices21,22,23, and provides the benefit of atomically precise interfaces and barrier thicknesses24. We leave the optically active TMD layer exposed at the top of the device purposefully to offer interfacing with other systems.

Figure 1: Design and operation of a TMD-based LED.
Figure 1

(a) Optical microscope image of a typical device used in our experiments. The dotted lines highlight the footprint of the SLG, hBN and the TMD layers individually. The Cr/Au electrodes contact the SLG and TMD layers to provide an electrical bias. (b) Heterostructure band diagram. The top illustration shows the case for zero-applied bias and the bottom illustration shows the case for a finite negative bias applied to the SLG. Tuning the SLG Fermi level (EF) across the TMD conduction band edge (EC) allows electron tunnelling from the SLG to the TMD, resulting in light emission via radiative recombination of the electrons with the holes residing in the p-doped TMD layer. The appearance of valence-band holes below the Fermi level is due to the natural p-doping of WSe2. (c) An example of layered LED emission spectra for an optically active layer of WSe2. Top (bottom) spectra correspond to 10 K (RT) operation temperature, where the black and blue spectra are obtained by optical excitation and electrical excitation, respectively.

Figure 1b illustrates the operational concept of our LED. At zero bias between the SLG and the monolayer TMD contacts, the Fermi energy (EF) of the system is constant across the heterojunction, preventing net charge flow (current) between the layers (Fig. 1b, top). A negative bias applied to the SLG electrode raises the SLG EF above the minimum of the conduction band (EC) of grounded WSe2. This induces electrons to tunnel from the SLG into the monolayer WSe2. This initiates photoemission through radiative recombination between the tunnelled electrons and the holes residing in the optically active WSe2 area (Fig. 1b, bottom). Figure 1c compares the EL and photoluminescence (PL) spectra from this monolayer-WSe2-based LED device for two operation temperatures, room temperature (RT) and 10 K (see ‘Methods’ and Supplementary Fig. 10 for measurement set-up). PL at RT is given by the black curve in the lower panel with a broad peak at 750 nm corresponding to the monolayer WSe2 unbound neutral exciton emission, X0 (ref. 25). Under electrical excitation the main peak is shifted 20 nm to longer wavelengths, which is commensurate with the charged exciton, X (ref. 26), as shown in the blue curve. The black and blue spectra in the upper panel of Fig. 1c show the device’s PL and EL emission at 10 K, respectively. Because of the increased bandgap at low temperatures, the unbound exciton emission is shifted to shorter wavelengths by 30 nm (ref. 27). Consistent with recent reports13,14,15,16,17,27, extra structure arising from localized exciton state emission (L) appears at longer wavelengths in the PL spectrum. Critically, these features are also visible under electrical excitation. In the low-current regime (<1 μA for this device) they dominate the EL spectrum, as shown in Fig. 1c, indicating that localized exciton states respond more efficiently to charge injection than the delocalized ones.

Electrically driven quantum light in a WSe2-based LED

Figure 2a is a spatial map of integrated EL from a WSe2-based LED device at 10 K. The active region of this device consists of adjacent monolayer and bilayer active areas, both in contact with the ground electrode. The brighter area in Fig. 2a corresponds to the bilayer, suggesting that most of the injected current flows through this region (see Supplementary Fig. 11). In addition to the spatially uniform light emission from delocalized excitons, we observe quantum LED (QLED) operation in the form of highly localized light emission from both the monolayer and the bilayer WSe2, identified by the dotted circles (Fig. 2a). These localized states lie within the bandgap of WSe2, and therefore emit at lower energies (longer wavelength) with respect to the bulk exciton emission (see Fig. 2b)13,14,15,16,17. Figure 2c shows example emission spectra from these sites, where the top (bottom) spectrum belongs to a quantum emitter in the monolayer (bilayer) WSe2. We observe spectrally isolated peaks from multiple locations in most devices with linewidths ranging between 0.8 and 3 nm. We see on average 1–2 emitters per 40 μm2 active device area. Electrically excited narrow lines coming from bilayer WSe2 regions are typically redshifted with respect to those coming from the monolayer regions28. The emission peaks of Fig. 2c are unpolarized, and the fine structure splitting reported in PL experiments (0.3 nm (refs 13, 14, 15, 16, 17)) is not resolvable due to the broader linewidths we observe in EL. On the timescale of seconds, most emitters show spectral wandering, of up to 2 nm, similar to that seen in our PL measurements. Gating and encapsulation of the active layer should aid in reducing the broad linewidths observed here, which we attribute to charge noise in the device. Slow spectral fluctuations can further be reduced through active feedback, for example via the direct current Stark shift29,30. A fraction of the quantum emitters display blinking, discrete spectral jumps or multiple spectral lines at similar timescales (see Supplementary Fig. 12). We also see that, as in PL, the electrically driven emitters display robust operation, withstanding multiple (3–5) cooling/heating cycles and several hours of measurement under uninterrupted current flow.

Figure 2: .WSe.2.-based QLED operation in the near infrared spectrum.
Figure 2

(a) A raster-scan map of integrated EL intensity from monolayer and bilayer WSe2 areas of the QLED for an injection current of 3 μA (12.4 V). The dotted circles highlight the submicron localized emission in this device. (b) A schematic energy band diagram, similar to that in Fig. 1b, including the confined electronic states of the quantum dots. EL emission from quantum dots typically starts at lower bias than the conventional LED operation threshold. (c) Typical EL emission spectra for quantum dots in the monolayer (top) and bilayer (bottom) WSe2. The shaded area highlights the spectral window for LED emission due to bulk WSe2 excitons, whereas QLED operation produces spectra at longer wavelengths. (d) Comparison of the integrated EL intensity for the WSe2 layer and for a quantum dot as a function of the applied current. The linear increase in WSe2 layer EL contrasts with the saturation behaviour of the QLED emission. (e) Intensity-correlation function, g(2)(τ), for the same emitter displaying the antibunched nature of the EL signal, g(2)(0)=0.29±0.08, and a rise-time of 9.4±2.8 ns.

Figure 2d plots the current dependence of the integrated EL intensity from a quantum emitter, as well as from the unbound monolayer WSe2 excitons. The latter shows a predominantly linear relation between emission intensity and injected current; however, EL emission from the quantum emitter shows clear saturation as a function of current, a universal behaviour seen with single-photon sources31 (see Supplementary Fig. 13 for a plot of the unbound exciton and quantum emitter spectra as a function of current). Figure 2e shows the measured intensity-correlation function, g(2)(τ), of the integrated EL emission from a WSe2-based QLED using a Hanbury Brown and Twiss interferometer (see ‘Methods’). The value of the normalized g(2)(0) drops to 0.29±0.08, well below the threshold value of 0.5, expected for a single-photon source1. We note that these data are not corrected for background emission within the broad spectral window of detection or for the photon-counting detector dark counts, which together contribute to the non-zero value of g(2)(0). While our results manifest the single-photon nature of the electrically generated emission as proof-of-concept, the immediate usability of these quantum emitters as single-photon sources would benefit from spectral filtering to suppress the background emission. Further technical improvements, such as optimized designs for charge injection, may be possible once the nature of these emitters is identified.

All-electrical generation of single-photon emission in WS2

In TMD-based quantum emitters, the host material influences the quantized energy levels and consequently their emission wavelength. Therefore, in order to obtain single-photon emission in a complementary part of the spectrum, we replace the monolayer of WSe2 with WS2 (exfoliated from an n-doped bulk crystal) as the active layer; the rest of the QLED device structure remains unchanged. Figure 3a,b displays the spatial maps of integrated EL emission from a WS2-based QLED device at high- (0.665 μA) and low- (0.570 μA) current injection, respectively. At high current, the emission intensity is spatially uniform in the monolayer. At low currents, however, a spatially localized emission site dominates, indicating that WS2 also hosts localized quantum emitters. Figure 3c shows the EL spectrum as a function of injection current, demonstrating that the low current (0.570 μA) regime leads to a narrow (4 nm) emission at 640 nm, a line cut (in blue) of which is in the bottom right panel. Figure 3c (upper right plot) also shows how the EL spectrum is broadened significantly when driven strongly at an injection current of 1.8 μA. The EL at 640 nm lies within the spectral region of an emission band that appears, in addition to the unbound exciton emission, at low temperature (<10 K) under optical excitation (see Supplementary Figs 14 and 15 for details and Supplementary Fig. 16 for a comparison between the raster-scan maps of integrated EL intensity from WS2 and WSe2 at RT and 10 K). Operating in the low-current range ensures that the full EL spectrum is dominated by single-photon emission from the quantum emitter, obviating any need for tailored spectral filtering. The intensity-correlation measurement for EL in this regime, without spectral filtering, yields the g(2)(τ) data in Fig. 3d. Similar to the WSe2 emitters, the uncorrected, but normalized, g(2)(0) falls below 0.5 to 0.31±0.05, indicating that WS2 supports stable QLED operation, generating single photons in the visible spectral range.

Figure 3: .WS.2.-based QLED operation in the visible spectrum.
Figure 3

A raster-scan map of integrated EL intensity from the monolayer WS2 area of the device: (a) at 0.665 μA injection current (bias 2.08 V), where the emission is delocalized and roughly uniform, and (b) at 0.570 μA (1.97 V), where the highly localized QLED emission dominates over the unbound WS2 exciton emission. (c) A map of the EL spectrum, displaying the evolution of the WS2 QD emission spectrum as a function of current. The spectrum at the top (bottom) of the panel is a line cut for injection current of 1.8 μA (0.578 μA). (d) Intensity-correlation function, g(2)(τ), for the same quantum dot displaying the antibunched nature of the EL signal, g(2)(0)=0.31±0.05, and a rise-time of 1.4±0.15 ns.

Discussion

Our TMD-based QLEDs rely on a single tunnelling heterojunction design, where a wide range of TMDs can be active materials. Other designs, employing a back gate to tune EF of the active TMD layer and providing electrostatic tuning of the EL emission spectrum, can enhance the versatility of these devices. One possibility is the deterministic control over the charging states of confined excitons32, en route to spin control33 and entangled photon generation34. We also note that the emission wavelength range for WSe2 emitters can match rubidium transitions (780 nm) for exploring quantum storage possibilities. Similarly, silicon-vacancy centres (737 nm) and nitrogen-vacancy centres (637 nm) in diamond can have matching transitions with the WSe2 and WS2 QLEDs, respectively, for interfacing hybrid quantum systems via distributed or on-chip photonic channels. Other TMDs are likely to yield similar results decorating different spectral windows. Our results demonstrate that LMs are a platform for fully integrable and atomically precise devices for quantum photonics technologies.

Methods

Device fabrication

We exfoliate the LMs on oxidized Si wafers by micromechanical cleavage of bulk crystals of graphite (NGS Naturgraphit), TMDs (HQ Graphene) and hBN single crystals, grown by the temperature-gradient method under high pressure and high temperature35. Mono-, bi- and few-layer samples are identified by a combination of optical contrast (see Supplementary Figs 1, 3 and 5)36, Raman spectroscopy (see Supplementary Figs 2, 4a, 6 and 7a)37, PL (see Supplementary Figs 4b and 7b) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) (see Supplementary Fig. 8). Single crystals are assembled into heterostructures via a dry-transfer technique38. A transparent stack comprising a glass slide, a polydimethylsiloxane layer attached to the glass and polycarbonate (PC) as an external film is mounted on a micromanipulator positioned under an optical microscope with a temperature-controlled stage. After adjusting the alignment and bringing the transfer stack into contact with the exfoliated TMD flakes, these are picked up due to their higher adhesion to PC. The process is repeated for the hBN tunnel barrier. Finally, after aligning and bringing in contact hBN and TMD on PC with exfoliated SLG on Si/SiO2, the temperature is raised to 100 °C, releasing the PC with hBN/TMD onto SLG. Then, the sample is soaked in chloroform to dissolve the PC film, leaving the SLG/hBN/TMD heterostructure on the Si/SiO2 substrate. Finally, Cr/Au (3/50 nm) contacts both to SLG and TMD are patterned by e-beam lithography following a standard lift-off process. Heterostructures are characterized by Raman spectroscopy to ensure no degradation (see Supplementary Notes 1–3 for further details).

Confocal microscopy

PL and EL measurements are performed using a home-built confocal microscopy mounted on a three-axis stage (Physik Instrumente M-405DG) with a 5-cm travel range and 200-nm resolution for coarse alignment and a piezo scanning mirror (Physik Instrumente S-334) for high resolution raster scans (see Supplementary Fig.10 for a diagram of the optical set-up). PL and EL are collected using a 1.7-mm working distance objective with a numerical aperture of 0.7 (Nikon S Plan Fluor 60 ×) and detected on a fibre-coupled single-photon-counting module (PerkinElmer SPCM-AQRH). A variable-temperature helium flow cryostat (Oxford Instruments Microstat HiRes2) is used to perform PL and EL measurements. A controlled bias is applied to the QLED devices by a source measurement unit (Keithley 2,400) for EL experiments. Intensity correlations from the Hanbury Brown and Twiss interferometer are recorded with a time-to-digital converter (quTAU). A double-grating spectrometer (Princeton Instruments) is used for acquiring spectra. For PL measurements, the excitation laser (700/520 nm, Thorlabs MCLS1) is suppressed with a long pass filter (715 nm, Semrock FF01-715/550 nm Thorlabs FEL0550).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Palacios-Berraquero, C. et al. Atomically thin quantum light-emitting diodes. Nat. Commun. 7, 12978 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12978 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Electrically driven single-photon source. Science 295, 102–105 (2002).

  2. 2.

    et al. Electrically driven single-photon source at room temperature in diamond. Nat. Photonics 6, 299–303 (2012).

  3. 3.

    et al. Single-photon emitting diode in silicon carbide. Nat. Commun. 6, 7783 (2015).

  4. 4.

    et al. Electrically driven photon antibunching from a single molecule at room temperature. Nat Commun. 3, 628 (2012).

  5. 5.

    , , & Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photonics 4, 611–622 (2010).

  6. 6.

    et al. Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems. Nanoscale 7, 4598–4810 (2014).

  7. 7.

    et al. Monolayer excitonic laser. Nat. Photonics 9, 733–737 (2015).

  8. 8.

    et al. Graphene mode-locked ultrafast laser. ACS Nano 4, 803–810 (2010).

  9. 9.

    et al. A graphene-based broadband optical modulator. Nature 474, 64–67 (2011).

  10. 10.

    , , & Graphene electro-optic modulator with 30 GHz bandwidth. Nat. Photonics 9, 511–514 (2015).

  11. 11.

    et al. Photodetectors based on graphene, other two-dimensional materials and hybrid systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 780–793 (2014).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Two-dimensional material nanophotonics. Nat. Photonics 8, 899–907 (2014).

  13. 13.

    et al. Optically active quantum dots in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 491–496 (2015).

  14. 14.

    et al. Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 497–502 (2015).

  15. 15.

    et al. Single photon emitters in exfoliated WSe2 structures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 503–506 (2015).

  16. 16.

    , , , & Voltage-controlled quantum light from an atomically thin semiconductor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 507–511 (2015).

  17. 17.

    et al. Single-photon emission from localized excitons in an atomically thin semiconductor. Optica 2, 347 (2015).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 37–41 (2015).

  19. 19.

    et al. Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors. ACS Nano 6, 74–80 (2011).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Ultrafast response of monolayer molybdenum disulfide photodetectors. Nat. Commun. 6, 8831 (2015).

  21. 21.

    et al. Electrically tunable excitonic light-emitting diodes based on monolayer WSe2 p-n junctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 268–272 (2014).

  22. 22.

    , , & Optoelectronic devices based on electrically tunable p-n diodes in a monolayer dichalcogenide. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 262–267 (2014).

  23. 23.

    , & Solar-energy conversion and light emission in an atomic monolayer p-n diode. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 257–261 (2014).

  24. 24.

    et al. Light-emitting diodes by band-structure engineering in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 14, 301–306 (2015).

  25. 25.

    et al. Evolution of electronic structure in atomically thin sheets of WS2 and WSe2. ACS Nano 7, 791–797 (2013).

  26. 26.

    et al. Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 634–638 (2013).

  27. 27.

    et al. Valley dynamics probed through charged and neutral exciton emission in monolayer WSe2. Phys. Rev. B 90, (2014).

  28. 28.

    , & Strain-induced spatial and spectral isolation of quantum emitters in mono- and bilayer WSe2. Nano Lett. 15, 7567–7573 (2015).

  29. 29.

    , , , & Frequency stabilization of the zero-phonon line of a quantum dot via phonon-assisted active feedback. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 172107 (2014).

  30. 30.

    et al. Dynamic stabilization of the optical resonances of single nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 206401 (2012).

  31. 31.

    , , & Invited review article: single-photon sources and detectors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 071101 (2011).

  32. 32.

    et al. Optical emission from a charge-tunable quantum ring. Nature 405, 926–929 (2000).

  33. 33.

    , , & Coherent control of a single electron spin with electric fields. Science 318, 1430–1433 (2007).

  34. 34.

    et al. An entangled-light-emitting diode. Nature 465, 594–597 (2010).

  35. 35.

    , & Direct-bandgap properties and evidence for ultraviolet lasing of hexagonal boron nitride single crystal. Nat. Mater. 3, 404–409 (2004).

  36. 36.

    et al. Rayleigh imaging of graphene and graphene layers. Nano Lett. 7, 2711–2717 (2007).

  37. 37.

    & Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 235–246 (2013).

  38. 38.

    et al. Production and processing of graphene and 2d crystals. Mater. Today 15, 564–589 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support from the EU Graphene Flagship (no. 604391), ERC Grants Hetero2D and PHOENICS, EPSRC Grants EP/K01711X/1, EP/K017144/1, EP/N010345/1, EP/M507799/1, EP/L016087/1, EP/M013243/1 and the EPSRC Cambridge NanoDTC, EP/G037221/1. We are grateful to J. Barnes, C. Le Gall and H.S. Knowles for technical assistance.

Author information

Author notes

    • Carmen Palacios-Berraquero
    •  & Matteo Barbone

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, J.J. Thomson Ave., Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK

    • Carmen Palacios-Berraquero
    • , Dhiren M. Kara
    • , Jan Beitner
    •  & Mete Atatüre
  2. Cambridge Graphene Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FA, UK

    • Matteo Barbone
    • , Xiaolong Chen
    • , Ilya Goykhman
    • , Duhee Yoon
    • , Anna K. Ott
    •  & Andrea C. Ferrari
  3. Advanced Materials Laboratory, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0034, Japan

    • Kenji Watanabe
    •  & Takashi Taniguchi

Authors

  1. Search for Carmen Palacios-Berraquero in:

  2. Search for Matteo Barbone in:

  3. Search for Dhiren M. Kara in:

  4. Search for Xiaolong Chen in:

  5. Search for Ilya Goykhman in:

  6. Search for Duhee Yoon in:

  7. Search for Anna K. Ott in:

  8. Search for Jan Beitner in:

  9. Search for Kenji Watanabe in:

  10. Search for Takashi Taniguchi in:

  11. Search for Andrea C. Ferrari in:

  12. Search for Mete Atatüre in:

Contributions

M.A., A.C.F. and I.G. devised and managed the project. K.W. and T.T. provided high-quality hBN material, M.B., X.C. and I.G. fabricated the devices, C.P.-B. and D.M.K. performed the optical measurements, assisted by M.B., X.C. and I.G., and analysed the data. M.B., C.P.-B., D.Y. and A.K.O. performed Raman, PL, optical contrasts and AFM measurements and analysis. J.B. developed part of the data acquisition software for the confocal microscope. All authors participated in the writing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andrea C. Ferrari or Mete Atatüre.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1-16, Supplementary Notes 1-3 and Supplementary References

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12978

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.