Article | Open

Mechanism of pH-dependent activation of the sodium-proton antiporter NhaA

  • Nature Communications 7, Article number: 12940 (2016)
  • doi:10.1038/ncomms12940
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Escherichia coli NhaA is a prototype sodium-proton antiporter, which has been extensively characterized by X-ray crystallography, biochemical and biophysical experiments. However, the identities of proton carriers and details of pH-regulated mechanism remain controversial. Here we report constant pH molecular dynamics data, which reveal that NhaA activation involves a net charge switch of a pH sensor at the entrance of the cytoplasmic funnel and opening of a hydrophobic gate at the end of the funnel. The latter is triggered by charging of Asp164, the first proton carrier. The second proton carrier Lys300 forms a salt bridge with Asp163 in the inactive state, and releases a proton when a sodium ion binds Asp163. These data reconcile current models and illustrate the power of state-of-the-art molecular dynamics simulations in providing atomic details of proton-coupled transport across membrane which is challenging to elucidate by experimental techniques.

Introduction

Sodium-proton antiporters play a major role in regulating H+ and Na+ concentrations in the cell. NhaA from Escherichia coli is perhaps the most widely studied one, as evident from two high-resolution crystal structures and abundant biochemical and biophysical data1. NhaA exchanges two protons in the periplasm for one sodium in the cytoplasm, and its activity is tightly regulated by pH (ref. 2). Below pH 6.5 NhaA appears inactive, while between pH 7 and 8.5 the sodium efflux rate increases dramatically, with a maximum around pH 8.7 (refs 3, 4, 5). The first atomic-resolution crystal structure of NhaA solved at pH 4 (ref. 6) revealed a bundle of 12 transmembrane helices (TMs) forming the inward-facing conformation where the ion passage funnel opens to the cytoplasm (Fig. 1a). Remarkably, TMs IV and XI are interrupted by extended chains crossing each other in the middle of the membrane, where Asp163, Asp164, Asp133, Thr132 and Lys300 form the active site responsible for ion binding1. Asp163 and Asp164 are highly conserved and their mutations completely abolish the activity of NhaA7,8,9. Thr132, Asp133 and Lys300 are also well conserved and their mutations impair the antiporter activity9,10,11. Biophysical and biochemical experiments suggested that Asp163, Asp164 and Thr132 are involved in ion binding11.

Figure 1: Structural features of NhaA.
Figure 1

(a) The first (previous) atomic-resolution crystal structure of NhaA (pdb 1ZCD, resolution 3.45 Å)6 with residues in the pH sensor (entrance of the cytoplasmic funnel) and active site highlighted. The cytoplasmic funnel involves TMs IX, I, II and loops of TMs VIII and IX. The pH sensor contains Asp11 (TM I), Glu78, Arg81 and Glu82 (TM II), His243 (loop between TM VIII and IX), Lys249, Arg250, Glu252, His253 and His256 (TM IX). The active site contains Asp133 (between TMs IVc and IVp), Asp163 (TM V), Asp164 (TM V) and Lys300 (TM X). Acidic (Asp and Glu) and basic residues (Lys, Arg and His) are shown in red and blue, respectively. (b) Difference in the active site between the previous (yellow)6 and new crystal structures (cyan, pdb 4AU5, resolution 3.7 Å).

Based on the first crystal structure of NhaA6, Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) continuum electrostatics calculations with an effective protein dielectric constant of 4 showed that the pKa’s of Asp163 and Asp164 are shifted above 15, thus suggesting the two residues as the proton carriers required for exchanging a sodium ion12,13. Supported by Cys-scanning mutagenesis experiments, Padan and coworkers proposed that a ‘pH sensor’, a cluster of residues at the entrance of the cytoplasmic funnel (Fig. 1a), is responsible for the pH dependence of the NhaA activity14,15,16. They further proposed that a pH signal from the cytoplasm results in deprotonation of a single pH-sensing residue, presumably Glu78 based on the PB calculations12, which is transduced down to the active site triggering a conformational change and consequently the pKa downshifts of Asp163 and Asp164, leading to the release of two protons1,17.

The above pH activation-based allosteric mechanism1 was recently challenged by a new set of data. Electrophysiology experiments showed that, under symmetric, saturating sodium concentration and pH 8.5 on the periplasmic side, reverse transport persists when pH on the cytoplamic side is lowered from 8 to 5 (ref. 4). Together with studies on related antiporters18, it prompted the proposal of an alternative model, in which Na+ and H+ directly compete for binding to a common site19. The identity of the residues involved in the binding site remained however speculative. Measurements of lithium binding to mutants of Lys300 suggested its positive charge and pKa are essential for antiporter activity, possibly by affecting sodium binding11. Additional evidence for the involvement of Lys300 came from a new crystal structure of NhaA20, solved at the same pH condition and diffraction resolution as the previous one6, showing a salt bridge between Lys300 and Asp163 (Fig. 1b). An equivalent salt bridge is also seen in the crystal structures (solved at pH 7.8) of the homologous sodium-proton antiporter NapA from Thermus thermophilus in the outward-21 and inward-facing states22. Like NhaA, NapA is electrogenic and therefore the Lys300–Asp163 salt bridge is likely of functional importance.

The competitive binding model is also supported by the recent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations based on the new crystal structure of NhaA20 and combinations of protonation states of Asp163/Asp164/Lys300 (ref. 20). The simulations revealed that when Asp164 was protonated, no sodium binding occurred, and the salt bridge remained intact between charged Asp163 and Lys300; however, when Asp164 was deprotonated, sodium entered and bound to Asp164 and Asp163, which destabilized the salt bridge20. pKa calculations using PROPKA23 based on the trajectory snapshots suggested that Lys300 is likely charged when it is in salt bridge with Asp163 (ref. 20). These results, together with the recent crystal structures of NapA21,22 as well as biophysical and biochemical experiments4,11,18, led to a modified competitive binding mechanism20. At low pH in the inward-facing state of NhaA, protons are bound to Asp164 and Lys300; the latter forms a salt bridge with the deprotonated Asp163. Sodium entrance to the active site results in binding to Asp163 and Asp164. The former leads to the breakage of the salt bridge and release of a proton from Lys300, while the latter represents a direct competition with a proton and leads to the deprotonation of Asp164. Following the proton-sodium exchange, a conformational switch from the inward- to the outward-facing state takes place. Thus, a major difference from the allosteric mechanism is whether the sodium-proton exchange requires a pH-induced activation step1. Most recently, based on the new crystal structure20, the function of NhaA was explored by Warshel and coworker using a novel approach which combines semi-macroscopic pKa calculations with Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations24. This study supported Asp163 and Asp164 as the two proton carriers12 and the recent competitive binding4 and alternating access models20. Further, it was able to reproduce and rationalize features of the observed antiport activity, including the 2:1 stoichiometry and pH activity profile4.

Over the past decade, constant pH MD techniques have been developed that can offer atomic description of pH-coupled conformational dynamics (see refs 25, 26, 27, 28 and a recent review29). A promising alternative approach that can offer kinetic information has also been developed based on time-dependent MC simulations and the Empirical Valence Bond model30. Here we use the state-of-the-art continuous constant pH MD (CpHMD)31,32, which incorporates a membrane-embedded hybrid-solvent scheme and pH replica-exchange sampling protocol33, to explore the pH-dependent conformational dynamics of NhaA. Our study suggests that the pH sensor responds to pH, and Asp164 and Lys300 are the two proton carriers. Further, deprotonation of Asp164 allows opening of the cytoplasmic gate and binding of a sodium to the core residues including Asp163. The latter disrupts the Lys300–Asp163 salt bridge, leading to neutralization of Lys300 and a conformational change involving the region between the core and dimerization domains. Thus, our study offers an atomically detailed view of the pH activation and initial events of the sodium-proton exchange of NhaA, reconciling the current models regarding the intricate working of the antiporter.

Results

Overview of simulations

Three sets of pH replica-exchange CpHMD simulations of NhaA embedded in a POPC lipid bilayer were performed (Supplementary Table 1). The first set was initiated from the recent crystal structure20 (PDB ID: 4AU5), while the other two were initiated from the previous crystal structure6 (PDB ID: 1ZCD). During the simulations, all Asp, Glu, His and Lys sidechains were allowed to titrate. Unless otherwise noted, the discussion refers to the first set of simulations. The corresponding data from the other two sets are given in Supplementary Information and show general agreement with the first set of simulations. Convergence analyses are given in Supplementary Figs 1–4.

pH sensor responds to the pH signal and attracts sodium

To explore the role of the ‘pH sensor’, we examine the calculated pKa’s of ionizable residues located at the entrance of the cytoplasmic funnel of NhaA15, including Asp11 (TM I), Glu78, Arg81, and Glu82 (TM II), His243 (loop between TM VIII and TM IX), Lys249, Arg250, Glu252, His253 and His256 (TM IX) (Table 1). The previous continuum electrostatics calculation predicted Glu78 to have a pKa in the physiological pH range13. Our simulations, however, showed that Glu78 and in fact, all acidic residues in the pH sensor have pKa values below 4, which is not surprising, since they are surrounded by positively charged residues. All these acidic residues are thus fully deprotonated at the lowest pH conditions when activity can be experimentally detected, namely pH 6.5 (ref. 3) and more recently pH 5 (ref. 4). Thus, our simulations do not support Glu78 as the single pH-sensing residue. Rather, in light of the fact that mutations of all of the aforementioned pH sensor residues have been shown to significantly alter the pH profile of NhaA14,16, we reasoned that their collective charge helps attract sodium ions into the funnel above an activation pH. To test this hypothesis, we calculated the total net charge of the pH sensor residues as a function of pH. Remarkably, as pH increases from 3.5 to 9.5, the net charge decreases from 2.8 to −1.0, and the sign switch occurs around pH 7 (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. 5), close to the onset of measurable activity near pH 7 in biochemical3 and electrophysiology measurements4. Thus, we suggest that, rather than an individual residue, the pH sensor region collectively responds to the pH signal from the cytoplasm, recruiting sodium and activating NhaA as pH is increased to the active range, consistent with previous observations that negative potential on the vestibule of ion channels attracts cation into the pore34,35.

Table 1: Calculated pKa’s of titratable residues in the pH sensor and active site of NhaA.
Figure 2: Net charge of the pH sensor switches sign at activation pH.
Figure 2

Calculated total net charge of the residues in the pH sensor, Asp11, Glu78, Arg81, Glu82, His243, Lys249, Arg250, Glu252, His253 and His256. The error bars indicate the root-mean-squared fluctuations in the simulation. A horizontal line at net charge zero is drawn to guide the eye. Except for arginines which were kept in the charged state, all of the above residues were allowed to titrate in the simulation.

Asp164 and Lys300 are the two proton carriers

To identify the proton carriers in the sodium-proton exchange process of NhaA, we turn to the calculated pKa’s of the core residues (Table 1). Asp164 is absolutely conserved in the sodium-proton antiporters across all species. Based on our simulations starting from both the recent and previous crystal structures, Asp164 is the only one among the three acidic core residues that has a pKa (5.0/6.6/5.8), close to the activation pH for all three simulation runs. In contrast, the pKa of Asp163 is below 4 in all three runs (2.4/3.5/3.9). Thus, Asp164 is the residue that can switch protonation state near the activation pH, in support of the hypothesis that Asp164 is one of the two proton carriers based on recent experiments4,11,21. Our data is also in agreement with the conclusions from the previous computational work12,20,36. Our simulations showed that, pKa(Asp164) >pKa(Asp133) >pKa(Asp163), consistent with the PROPKA calculation23 using the trajectories starting from the new crystal structure20. Asp164 has also been suggested as a proton carrier in the continuum electrostatics calculations based on the previous crystal structure12. This is not surprising, as our simulations initiated from the same crystal structure also assigned Asp164 with the highest pKa among the three core acidic residues (Table 1). We note that our calculated pKa of Asp163, which is downshifted from the model value, is in qualitative agreement with the pKa obtained by the semi-macroscopic calculations considering neutral Asp164 and charged Lys300 (ref. 24; Supplementary Note 1).

It is worthwhile noting the limitations of computational pKa predictions. The PB-estimated pKa of Asp164 (about 13)12 is too high, consistent with the benchmark study of PB-based pKa predictions of interior residues using the same effective protein dielectric constant (ɛp=4)37. Although overestimation of pKa shifts can be dampened by adopting a larger ɛp to implicitly account for reorganization of the interior polar groups and water penetration, the improvement is limited37, as a single dielectric constant is insufficient to accurately capture both self energy and charge–charge interactions38. On the other hand, the CpHMD-estimated pKa of Asp164 is likely too low (by up to 2 units39), as the underlying GBSW model40 underestimates desolvation33,41, due to the use of van der Waals surface which excludes solvent-inaccessible crevices from solute cavity, reflecting the inherent difficulty in treating solute–solvent dielectric transition by GB models38. However, the extent of the error is fortuitously cancelled by the overestimation of desolvation due to inadequate structural relaxation33,41. As a result, the calculated pKa’s of internal groups from the hybrid-solvent CpHMD simulations show surprisingly small deviations from experiment33,39. The second limitation is related to the incomplete sampling in CpHMD simulations, which manifests itself in the dependence of the calculated pKa’s on the initial configuration. As a result, the calculated pKa’s of Asp164 from the simulations initiated from the earlier crystal structure are 0.8/1.6 units higher than the pKa from the simulation based on the recent crystal structure, because of the significant deviation between the two structures in this region (Fig. 1b). Given sufficient sampling (not within current computational resources), however, identical pKa’s should be obtained regardless of the starting structure.

The identity of the second proton carrier has been controversial. Computational studies based on the earlier crystal structure pointed to Asp163 (refs 12, 36), which is also supported by the recent semi-macroscopic simulations based on the new crystal structure24. However, the recent MD simulation based on the new crystal structure suggested Lys300 (ref. 20), consistent with the experimental evidence that the pKa of Lys300 is critical for the antiporter activity11. Our simulations initiated from both the recent and earlier crystal structures gave a macroscopic pKa of around 10 for Lys300, which is only slightly below the model pKa of 10.4 (model lysine in solution). The small pKa shift is a result of the balance between the desolvation effect which decreases the pKa and the electrostatic attraction with Asp163 which increases the pKa. Importantly, the latter is significantly influenced by ion binding. The simulation initiated from the recent crystal structure which contains the Lys300–Asp163 salt bridge showed that, in the presence of sodium binding to Asp163, the distance between Asp163 and Lys300 is significantly increased relative to configurations without sodium binding (Fig. 3a; Supplementary Fig. 6). Thus, sodium binding leads to the disruption of the Lys300–Asp163 salt bridge. Consequently, deprotonation of Lys300 is shifted to a lower pH range, and the (microscopic) pKa in the presence of ion binding is reduced to 8.9, nearly three units from the pKa of 11.6, calculated using configurations in the absence of sodium binding to Asp163 (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, experiment showed that the peak current increases at pH above 7 and reaches a maximum around pH 8.7 (refs 4, 5). Thus, our data suggest that within the active pH range Lys300 releases a proton, lending support to the most recent hypothesis that Lys300 is the second proton carrier20. We note that, while the calculated pKa in the presence of sodium binding reports on the change in conformational environment, it does not account for the explicit ion interactions in the electrostatic calculations for propagating titration coordinates33,42, for example, between sodium and Lys300, which would destabilize the charged state of Lys300, thereby lowering its pKa. However, since the average distance between sodium and Lys300 is about 8 Å when sodium is bound to Asp163 (Supplementary Fig. 7), the pKa decrease due to the latter effect is expected to be small.

Figure 3: Sodium binding disrupts the Lys300–Asp163 salt bridge and lowers the pKa of Lys300.
Figure 3

(a) Probability distribution of the distance between the amine nitrogen of Lys300 and nearest carboxylate oxygen of Asp163 in the presence (red) and absence (blue) of sodium binding. Data from all pH conditions were used. (b) Fraction of deprotonated Lys300 at different pH in the presence (red) and absence (blue) of sodium binding. Solid curves are the best fits to the generalized Henderson–Hasselbalch equation. The estimated pKa’s are indicated. Sodium ion is considered bound if the distance to the nearest carboxylate oxygen of Asp163 is below 3 Å.

Our calculated pKa (11.6) in the absence of sodium binding shows an upshift from the model value, which is in qualitative agreement with the pKa (12.81) obtained by the semi-macroscopic calculations24 (see Supplementary Information for detailed comparison), and suggests that Lys300 is charged in the inactive state of NhaA. To further validate the protonation state of Lys300, we examined its interactions with the partial negative dipoles of the C termini of TMs XIc and IVp. When Lys300 is charged, the interactions are intact; however, when Lys300 is neutralized, the interactions are disrupted (Supplementary Fig. 8). Thus, Lys300 is protonated in the inactive structure of NhaA. We note that, due to the limited timescale of MD simulations, the calculation of sodium flux was not attempted in this work. However, the study by Warshel and coworker based on MC simulations24 was able to provide the pH profile of sodium flux as well as the free energy profile of sodium binding, consistent with experiment4.

Deprotonation of Asp164 triggers gate to open

Having established that Asp164 is one of the proton carriers, and considering that it is the first core residue located immediately below the cytoplasmic funnel, we tested whether its deprotonation induces a conformational change and entrance of water. Opening of hydrophobic cavity and water penetration due to ionization of internal groups has been previously observed in both experimental and computational studies of Staphylococcal nuclease39,43,44. We zoom in on the end of the cytoplasmic funnel of NhaA, which narrows to a passage lined by five hydrophobic sidechains, Val75 (TM II), Ile134 (TM IV), Met157, Ala160 and Ile161 (TM V), before reaching the active site (Fig. 4a). These hydrophobic sidechains will be referred to as the cytoplasmic gate, since they control the access of water and ion from the cytoplasm. As Asp164 is located immediately below the gate with Asp163 next to it (Fig. 4a), we examined the titration behaviour of both residues (Fig. 4b; Supplementary Fig. 9) and the possible correlation with the passage opening and hydration of the core region.

Figure 4: Deprotonation of Asp164 enables gate opening and water entrance.
Figure 4

(a) A zoomed-in view of the cytoplasmic gate and core residues Asp163 and Asp164. (b) Fraction of deprotonated Asp163 (cyan) and Asp164 (magenta) as a function of pH. Solid curves represent fitting to the generalized Henderson–Hasselbalch equation. (c) Water density map at the cross section of Asp164 below (pH 4, upper panel) and above (pH 8, lower panel) the NhaA activation pH. Asp163 and Asp164 are shown as yellow and green spheres, respectively. The colour scale is based on the units of bulk density of TIP3P water at 298 K (ref. 68). The density map was generated using VMD69. (d) Radius of gyration of the cytoplasmic gate (V75, I134, M157, A160 and I161) as a function of pH. Calculation was based on the sidechain heavy atoms. (e) Hydration number of Asp163 (cyan) and Asp164 (magenta) as a function of pH. Hydration number refers to the number of water in the first solvation shell of Asp163/Asp164, defined using a cutoff distance of 3.5 Å between the water oxygen and the nearest carboxylate oxygen of Asp. In d,e, each data point (for clarity not explicitly shown) is an average over all frames at a given pH.

To characterize the passage opening and hydration of the core, we calculated the radius of gyration based on the gate residues and the hydration number of Asp163 and Asp164 (number of water in the first solvation shell) as well as water density map (Fig. 4c–e; Supplementary Figs 10 and 11). At pH 2, Asp163 is partially and Asp164 is fully protonated; the radius of gyration is about 4.6 Å, similar to the crystal structure values, 4.2 Å of the earlier and 4.5 Å of the recent structure; there is one water near Asp163/Asp164. However, no ion is present in the core region (see later discussion). As pH is increased to 4, Asp163 becomes completely deprotonated (charged) and Asp164 remains protonated (neutral); the radius of gyration increases to about 5 Å. Interestingly, the hydration number of Asp164 increases to 2, whereas that of Asp163 remains below 1, and ions remain absent in the core region (later discussion). These data show that, charging of Asp163 leads to slight opening of the gate; however, the passage is not wide enough to accommodate a possibly hydrated sodium ion. Thus, at low pH the cytoplasmic funnel is closed, consistent with experiments showing NhaA is inactive either under a forward proton gradient with an inside pH below 6.5 (ref. 3) or under a sodium gradient with symmetric pH below 6.5 (ref. 4).

In the pH range 4–7, Asp163 remained deprotonated, while Asp164 titrates to become fully charged; there is a steep increase in both the radius of gyration and the hydration number of Asp164. At pH 7, the radius of gyration is about 5.5 Å, and the hydration number of Asp164 reaches 5, indicating that the gate is open and water enters, similar to the rapid wetting transition observed in hydrophobic nanopores of comparable size45,46. The pH-induced gate opening and water entrance into the core region is also visible from the water density map (Fig. 4c). In contrast, the hydration number of Asp163 remains very low. This is because Asp164 is immediately below the hydrophobic gate readily accessible to the cavity, whereas Asp163 is buried (Fig. 4c) and forms a salt bridge interaction with Lys300. Finally, as pH further increases above 7, there is little change in the radius of gyration or the hydration number of Asp164, which is readily understood since the deprotonation of Asp164 is complete at pH 7. In contrast, the hydration number of Asp163 sharply increases at pH above 8, which can be attributed to the disruption of the salt bridge with Lys300 following its deprotonation (Supplementary Fig. 12). Together, this set of data suggests that, while the deprotonation of Asp163 initiates local relaxation of the gate region, it is the deprotonation of Asp164 that triggers the gate to open so that water can enter the core region.

Sodium binding to Asp163/Asp164/Thr132

Along with the pH-induced gate dynamics and water penetration, our simulations reveal that a single sodium ion enters the cytoplasmic funnel and binds to the core residues in a pH-dependent manner. To identify the sodium binding sites, we calculated the probability of sodium binding based on a distance cutoff (Fig. 5a; Supplementary Fig. 13). Below pH 4, the probability of sodium binding to the core region is zero, in accord with the closed cytoplasmic gate and very limited water accessibility. Between pH 4 and 7, sodium occasionally coordinates to Asp164 and Thr132 through the carboxylate and backbone carbonyl groups, respectively, consistent with the opening of the cytoplasmic gate and water entrance. However, above pH 7, unlike the radius of gyration of the cytoplasmic gate or the hydration number of Asp164, which plateaus once the deprotonation of Asp164 is completed, the ion binding probability of Asp164 (and also Thr132) sharply increases. Moreover, Asp163 starts to bind sodium, resulting in the coordination to all three residues, Asp163, Asp164 and Thr132. These data suggest that the participation of Asp163 in ion binding stabilizes the ion residence in the core, facilitating the activation of NhaA above pH 7, consistent with experiments3,4. We note that the CpHMD data is consistent with the conventional fixed-protonation-state simulations showing that when Asp164 is deprotonated, sodium entered and bound to Asp163 and Asp164 (ref. 20). It is also in accord with the semi-macroscopic calculations which suggested that sodium binding is most favourable when both Asp163 and Asp164 are charged24.

Figure 5: pH-dependent sodium binding to the core residues.
Figure 5

(a) Probability of sodium binding to Thr132 (blue), Asp164 (magenta) and THr132/Asp163/Ap164 (cyan) as a function of pH. (b) A snapshot showing a sodium ion bound to Thr132/Asp163/Asp164. Sodium is considered bound if the distance to the nearest carboxylate oxygen of Asp163/Asp164 or the backbone carbonyl oxygen of T132 is below 3 Å. The probability was calculated by counting the number of frames. We note that the residence time of sodium is very long. Once it is bound, it does not leave in the CpHMD simulations. In the conventional simulations, the residence time is greater than 400 ns (ref. 20).

Deprotonation of Lys300 induces bending of TM V

An important aspect of the sodium-proton exchange process involves a conformational change, presumably following the release of two protons in exchange for a sodium. Such a conformational change is expected to occur on a much longer timescale as compared to our simulations. However, surprisingly, in one set of the CpHMD simulations (run 2 initiated from the earlier crystal structure), we observed that TM V, which resides between the core and dimerization domains, exhibited a bend around Asp163 when Lys300 is deprotonated (Fig. 6a,b). In addition, principal component analysis revealed that the major mode of the inward-facing NhaA involves a motion of the core relative to the dimerization domain (Supplementary Fig. 14). To quantify the degree of TM V bending, a bending angle is defined as the deviation from linearity of the angle formed by the Cα atoms of Leu152 (one end of TM V), Asp163 (middle of TM V) and Phe174 (the other end of TM V). Below pH 7 (activation pH), the peak of the bending angle distribution, that is, the most probable angle, is between 0° and 10°, indicating that TM V is nearly straight (Supplementary Fig. 15). At pH 7–10 (Asp164 is deprotonated and Lys300 is protonated), the distribution broadens to the range 5–22°, indicating that TM V becomes more flexible. Remarkably, as pH is further increased such that Lys300 becomes deprotonated, the distribution becomes bimodal with a second peak centring at about 34°, indicating the emergence of a second conformational state with a bent TM V.

Figure 6: Deprotonation of Lys300 is correlated with bending of TM V.
Figure 6

(a) Snapshot of NhaA with a straight TM V. (b) Snapshot of NhaA with a bent TM V. (c) Occupancy of the TM V-bent state versus fraction of the deprotonated Lys300. A configuration is considered as in the TM V-bent state if the TM V bending angle is greater than 28° (cutoff based on data shown in Supplementary Fig. 15). Data used all pH conditions (2.5–11.5). (d) Probability distribution of the minimum distance between the carboxylate oxygen of Asp163 and the amine nitrogen of Lys300 when TM V is bent (magenta) and straight (cyan). The data are from pH conditions 9–11.5 where TM V bending was observed. In all panels, the simulation run 2 starting from the previous crystal structure (PDB ID: 1ZCD) was used.

Plotting the occupancy of the TM V-bent state versus the fraction of Lys300 deprotonation reveals a nearly linear relationship (Fig. 6c), that is, the deprotonation of Lys300 is correlated with TM V bending. Further trajectory analysis revealed that in the TM V-bent state, Asp163 is bound to a sodium ion, while Lys300 is deprotonated and rotated away with a significantly increased distance between the two (Fig. 6b,d). These data suggest that the release of a second proton from Lys300 and the accompanying sodium binding of Asp163 lead to the bending of TM V. We note that, although TM V bending was not observed in the other two sets of CpHMD simulations, likely due to the limited sampling time, it was also seen in the conventional simulation initiated from the recent crystal structure and with Asp163/Asp164/Lys300 fixed in the deprotonated state (Supplementary Fig. 15). To further understand the origin of TM V bending, we examined the dynamics of TM V and its interactions with the environment. We found that the bending is correlated with the breakage of a hydrogen bond between the carboxylate of Asp163 and the backbone amide of Thr132 located on the adjacent helix. When TM V is straight, the hydrogen bond is intact; however, when TM V bends, the hydrogen bond is disrupted (Supplementary Fig. 16). Because the bend is located at Asp163, the Thr132–Asp163 hydrogen bond appears to hold the helix in place.

Agreement between CpHMD and conventional simulations

A major limitation of the current CpHMD implementation is the relatively short timescale (on the order of 10 ns per replica), which may result in the incomplete sampling of conformational states of protein and solvent despite the use of the pH replica-exchange enhanced sampling protocol. To assess convergence, we compare key quantities with the conventional simulations for different combinations of protonation states (1–3 μs each). Agreement is observed for the hydration levels for Asp163, and Asp164, the probability of sodium binding to Asp163, Asp164 and Thr132, and the behaviour of Asp163–Lys300 interaction (Supplementary Note 2; Supplementary Figs 17–20). As to the latter, the new NhaA crystal structure solved at pH 3.5 shows a salt bridge20, which remains stable in the conventional simulations S1 and S2 with charged Asp163 and Lys300. Consistent with these data, the CpHMD simulations now clearly explain this observation as a consequence of the low pKa of Asp163. The consistency between low pH crystal structure and both sets of simulations also corroborates the hypothesis that Asp163 is not one of the proton carriers because it remains charged at all physiologically accessible pH conditions.

Discussion

A key question regarding the mechanism of NhaA is related to the identities of specific residues responsible for proton uptake and release in the transport cycle. For a number of years, Asp163 and Asp164 have been considered as the two proton carriers4,6,17,36. However, recent molecular dynamics simulations based on the new crystal structure of NhaA suggested Lys300 but not Asp163 is the second proton carrier20, consistent with biochemical data11. Our results support the latter model. The CpHMD simulations showed that, when Lys300 forms a salt bridge with Asp163, its pKa is high (11.6) due to stabilization of the charged state by the attractive Coulomb interaction; however, when a sodium ion binds to Asp163, Lys300 rotates away leading to disruption of the salt bridge and lowering of the Lys300 pKa by almost 3 units to 8.9. We note that, the latter pKa is likely somewhat overestimated due to a known limitation of the hybrid-solvent CpHMD method which neglects the explicit interactions with ions33,42 which would destabilize the charged state of Lys300, lowering its pKa further. Thus, it is very likely that as pH reaches above 7–8 the release of the second proton from Lys300 could occur simultaneously with sodium binding to Asp163.

A second hypothesis our study aimed to test is related to a single residue at the entrance of the cytoplasmic funnel (pH sensor), which is thought to sense the pH signal and regulate the activation of NhaA allosterically15. An earlier study based on the continuum electrostatics calculations suggested that Glu78 has a pKa near the physiological range and can therefore trigger a conformational change required for activation12. Our simulations do not support this conjecture, as the calculated pKa’s of all acidic residues including Glu78 in the pH sensor are far below the physiological pH. Instead, three histidines in the pH sensor have pKa’s in the physiological range, and the switch of their protonation states together changes the net charge of the pH sensor from positive to negative at around pH 7, the same pH range in which sizable transporter activity could be experimentally measured3,4. Thus, we propose that the pH sensor residues collectively respond to the pH signal and attract sodium ions when pH rises above the activation value. This hypothesis is consistent with the observations that mutations of all the pH sensor residues strongly influence the pH-dependent activity of NhaA14,15,16.

Until now two models have been put forth to explain the pH regulation of NhaA. In the allosteric model proposed by Padan and coworkers1,15, a pH sensor residue (located at the cytoplamic funnel entrance but far from the core region) senses the pH signal and induces a conformational change that activates NhaA. In the competitive binding model4,19, a sodium ion and two protons compete for binding to the active site. Substrate binding lowers the energy barrier between two conformational states, resulting in the transition from one state to the other. Our data showed that, above the activation pH the deprotonation of Asp164 triggers the opening of the cytoplasmic gate formed by several hydrophobic residues lining the bottom of the cytoplasmic funnel and entrance of water as well as ion to the core region in a pH-dependent manner. Thus, access to the binding site is controlled via a pH-dependent hydrophobic gating mechanism45,46,47. Further, our simulations suggested that, sodium binding to Asp163 can trigger the release of a proton from Lys300, which in turn can induce bending of TM V located between the core and dimerization domains. Although such movement is not seen in the outward-facing state of NapA21 and MjNhaP1 from archaea48, we hypothesize that, since our simulations only capture the initial stage of the transport cycle, TM V bending may represent a kinetic intermediate accompanying the large conformational transition to the outward-facing state. Interestingly, it is consistent with the electrophysiology data which showed that mutation A167P on helix V markedly slows the rate of conformational transition but does not affect the optimum pH of NhaA5. To directly verify TM V bending, we suggest to test the mutation Thr132 to Val132, which eliminates the hydrogen bond with Asp163, would possibly facilitate TM V bending and accelerate the conformational switch. Thus, our data lend support to the competitive binding model for NhaA, modulated with the two pH-dependent effects of electrostatic funneling due to the overall charge of the pH sensor and the hydrophobic gate controlling access to the binding site.

Taken together, our work suggests the following mechanism for the antiport activity of NhaA. As pH is increased to the activation pH, the net charge of the pH sensor residues decreases to a negative value, attracting a sodium ion into the funnel. At the same time, Asp164 releases the first proton which induces opening of the cytoplasmic hydrophobic gate. The latter allows the entrance of water and a sodium ion, which is first captured by Asp164, the residue immediately below the cytoplasmic gate, and subsequently shared with Asp163 and Thr132. Sodium binding to Asp163 disrupts the salt bridge with Lys300, destabilizing its charged state and leading to the release of the second proton. The latter triggers a conformational change, possibly involving bending of TM V, which may precede a large conformational transition22 to the outward-facing state of NhaA. Because of the short simulation timescale, the above mechanism describes only the early events of the transport cycle. Nonetheless, our work reconciles the current models and provides atomic details of the pH-dependent activation and sodium-proton antiport of NhaA. Finally, we note that the CpHMD methodology is general and can be applied to illuminate other proton-coupled conformational processes in biology that are difficult to delineate by current experimental techniques.

Methods

System preparation

Two crystal structures of NhaA (PDB IDs: 1ZCD6 and 4AU5 (ref. 20)) were employed for this study. CpHMD run 1 was initiated from the monomer B of the new crystal structure (PDB ID: 4AU5, sequence 10–383), while run 2 and 3 were initiated from the subunit A of the previous crystal structure which is a monomer (PDB ID: 1ZCD, sequence 10–383 was used to be consistent with the monomer B of the new crystal structure). Hydrogen atoms were added to the protein using the HBUILD facility in CHARMM. The protein were then inserted into a preassembled lipid bilayer with 135 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) lipids using Membrane Builder in CHARMM-GUI (http://www.charmm-gui.org)49. The resulting number of lipids is 63 for the cytoplasmic- and 72 for the periplasm-facing leaflet. A water layer of 15 Å thickness was added to both sides of the lipid bilayer. Twenty-one sodium and 30 chloride ions for 4AU5 or 20 sodium and 29 chloride ions for 1ZCD were added to neutralize the simulation box at neutral pH (assuming model pKa’s for Asp/Glu/His/Lys) and to reach the ionic strength of 150 mM. To prepare for the continuous constant pH molecular dynamics (CpHMD) simulations dummy hydrogen atoms were added to the carboxylate groups of acidic residues following the documentation of the PHMD module31,32 in CHARMM50. The final systems contain about 50,000 atoms.

CpHMD simulations with pH replica exchange

The work employed the membrane-embedded hybrid-solvent CpHMD method32,33,51 with pH replica-exchange sampling protocol33. Here conformational sampling of transmembrane proteins is performed in explicit lipid bilayer, as in the conventional all-atom MD. The generalized Born GBSW membrane model40,52 is used to efficiently calculate the solvation free energies and forces needed to propagate titration coordinates. The pH replica-exchange protocol is employed to accelerate the convergence of pKa’s and pH-dependent conformational sampling33. The hybrid-solvent CpHMD has been demonstrated to offer rapid and accurate prediction of pKa’s and conformational dynamics involving sites buried in the protein interior as well as surfactant and lipid environments39,42,53.

CpHMD simulations were performed using CHARMM programme package (version c37a2)50, where the CpHMD method (PHMD module)32,33,51 and pH replica-exchange protocol (REPDSTR module)33 were implemented. The CHARMM22/CMAP all-atom force field54,55 was used to represent the protein, while the CHARMM36 lipid force field56 was used to represent the lipids. Water molecules were represented by the CHARMM modified TIP3P water model50. For propagation of titration coordinates, the membrane GBSW implicit-solvent model was used40,52. The GBSW input radii for the protein were taken from Chen et al.57. The implicit membrane thickness was set to 30 Å, which was calculated as the average distance between the C2 atoms of the lipids in the cytoplasmic- and periplasmic-facing leaflets. A switching region of 5 Å thickness was used for the transition between the low dielectric slab and bulk solvent. To exclude the implicit membrane from the interior of the protein, an exclusion cylinder with a radius of 15 Å was placed at the center of mass of the protein. The radius was chosen such that the cylinder encompasses the entire protein and minimal number of lipids. Other settings in CpHMD and GBSW follow the default values in the programme (see documentation of CHARMM c37a2 (ref. 50)).

The system was first equilibrated at pH 4 (near the crystallization pH condition) for 2.4–5.4 ns using the default multi-step protocol in CHARMM-GUI49,58. Following equilibration, the production simulation was performed using hybrid-solvent CpHMD with the pH replica-exchange protocol33, whereby each replica was simulated under constant NPTpH conditions at 310 K and 1 atm and specified pH. Temperature was maintained using a modified Hoover thermostat method59, while pressure was maintained using the Langevin piston coupling method60. The van der Waals interactions were smoothly switched to zero between 10 and 12 Å. The particle mesh Ewald method61 was used to calculate long-range electrostatics, with a real-space cutoff of 12 Å and a sixth-order interpolation with 0.9 Å grid spacing. The SHAKE algorithm was used to constrain bonds involving hydrogen to enable a 2-fs timestep. A GBSW electrostatic solvation free energy calculation40,52 was invoked every 5 MD steps to update the titration coordinates. The default settings were used, consistent with our previous work33. For simulation run 1, the pH range was 1.5–11.5 with a total of 28 replicas. For simulation run 2 and 3, the pH range was 2.5–11.5 with a total of 28 replicas. The specific pH conditions for run 1 were 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 2.75, 3.0, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4.0, 4.25, 4.5, 4.75, 5.0, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0, 9.5, 10.0, 10.25, 10.5, 10.75, 11.0 and 11.5. The specific pH conditions for run 2 and 3 were 2.5, 2.75, 3.0, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4.0, 4.25, 4.5, 4.75, 5.0, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 6.75, 7, 7.25, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0, 9.5, 10.0, 10.25, 10.5, 10.75, 11.0 and 11.5. An exchange between adjacent pH conditions was attempted every 500 MD steps (or 1 ps) with an acceptance ratio of about 30% for all replicas. The production simulation lasted 10–14 ns per replica, resulting in an aggregate sampling time of 280–381 ns for each set of CpHMD simulations. Data from the last 4 ns per replica for simulation runs 1 and 3 or the last 5.6 ns per replica for simulation run 2 was used for analysis. We note that within the production run time, the pKa of relevant residues were converged. Although longer simulation time may be desirable, we were constrained by the current speed of the CpHMD implementation (in CHARMM) and the available hardware resources.

Conventional fixed-protonation-state simulations

Simulations with fixed protonation states were taken from previous work by Lee et al.20. In brief, all-atom explicit solvent MD simulations were run with GROMACS62,63 with the OPLS-AA force field for protein and ions, and the TIP4P model for water64. The force field for POPC lipids was taken from Ulmschneider and Ulmschneider65. The orthorhombic simulation cell contained a NhaA dimer and about 112,000 atoms. Simulations were performed in the NPT ensemble with PME electrostatics and a 2-fs timestep while constraining all bonds including hydrogen atoms. The protonation states of key residues were manually fixed for each simulation as detailed in Supplementary Table 1; other residues were set to default values (see ref. 20 for further details). Simulations S1, S2, S4 were repeated three times and analysed in aggregate (totalling between 1.4 and 3 μs for each charge configuration); for S3 only a single 1-μs simulation was analysed (Supplementary Table 1). Trajectories were analysed at 1 ns intervals.

To check for a significant dependence on lipids, we performed a second, smaller set of simulations using a 4:1 POPE:POPG membrane which approximates the composition of a native E. coli inner membrane (see Table 1 for further simulation details). The simulations utilized the CHARMM36 protein66 and CHARMM36 lipid force fields56, the default CHARMM sodium ion parameters67 and CHARMM TIP3P water model50. The simulations were performed with the same protocol that was previously employed for the simulations of NapA22.

Analysis

The pKa values were calculated by fitting the unprotonated fractions of specified residue at simulated pH conditions to the generalized Henderson–Hasselbalch equation, ), where S is the unprotonated fraction and n is the Hill coefficient.

A Cα-atom-based principal component analysis was performed using the VIBRAN module in CHARMM50. The analysis was carried out for the trajectory at pH 11.5 from simulation run 2 in which bending of TM V was observed (see main text). The average coordinates were used as the reference. The first principal component has a larger eigenvalue than others, which accounts for 32% of the total variance.

Data availability

Molecular dynamics parameters, inputs and initial coordinates are available for download at http://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/18477. All other data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Huang, Y. et al. Mechanism of pH-dependent activation of the sodium-proton antiporter NhaA. Nat. Commun. 7, 12940 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12940 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    Functional and structural dynamics of NhaA, a prototype for Na+ and H+ antiporters, which are responsible for Na+ and H+ homeostasis in cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1837, 1047–1062 (2014).

  2. 2.

    , , & Alkaline pH homeostasis in bacteria: new insights. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1717, 67–88 (2005).

  3. 3.

    , & Overproduction and purification of a functional Na+/H+ antiporter coded by nhaA (ant) from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11289–11294 (1991).

  4. 4.

    , , & Transport mechanism and pH regulation of the Na+/H+ antiporter NhaA from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 23570–23581 (2011).

  5. 5.

    et al. Differential effects of mutations on the transport properties of the Na+/H+ antiporter NhaA from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 24666–24675 (2013).

  6. 6.

    et al. Structure of a Na+/H+ antiporter and insights into mechanism of action and regulation by pH. Nature 435, 1197–1202 (2005).

  7. 7.

    , , & Essential aspartic acid residues, Asp-133, Asp-163 and Asp-164, in the transmembrane helices of a Na+/H+ antiporter (NhaA) from Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 363, 264–268 (1995).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Transmembrane domain IV is involved in ion transport activity and pH regulation of the NhaA-Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 41, 609–617 (2002).

  9. 9.

    , , & Unraveling functional and structural interactions between transmembrane domains IV and XI of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 23104–23113 (2004).

  10. 10.

    , & Functional and structural interactions of the transmembrane domain X of NhaA, Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli, at physiological pH. Biochemistry 46, 2419–2430 (2007).

  11. 11.

    , , , & Revealing the ligand binding site of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter and its pH dependence. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 38150–38157 (2012).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Multiconformation continuum electrostatics analysis of the NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli with functional implications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2629–2634 (2006).

  13. 13.

    , , & Combined computational and biochemical study reveals the importance of electrostatic interactions between the ‘pH sensor’ and the cation binding site of the sodium/proton antiporter NhaA of Escherichia coli. Proteins 76, 548–559 (2009).

  14. 14.

    , & Structure-based functional study reveals multiple roles of transmembrane segment IX and loop VIII-IX in NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli at physiological pH. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 15975–15987 (2008).

  15. 15.

    The enlightening encounter between structure and function in the NhaA Na+-H+ antiporter. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 435–443 (2008).

  16. 16.

    , , , & Transmembrane segment II of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter lines the cation passage, and Asp65 is critical for pH activation of the antiporter. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 2211–2220 (2010).

  17. 17.

    & Site-directed tryptophan fluorescence reveals two essential conformational changes in the Na+/H+ antiporter NhaA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15769–15777 (2011).

  18. 18.

    , , & Keeping it simple, transport mechanism and pH regulation in Na+/H+ exchangers. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 13168–13176 (2014).

  19. 19.

    & A universal mechanism for transport and regulation of CPA sodium proton exchangers. Biol. Chem. 396, 1091–1096 (2015).

  20. 20.

    et al. Crystal structure of the sodium-proton antiporter NhaA dimer and new mechanistic insights. J. Gen. Physiol. 144, 529–544 (2014).

  21. 21.

    et al. A two-domain elevator mechanism for sodium/proton antiport. Nature 501, 573–577 (2013).

  22. 22.

    et al. Crystal structures reveal the molecular basis of ion translocation in sodium/proton antiporters. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 248–255 (2016).

  23. 23.

    , & Improved treatment of ligands and coupling effects in empirical calculation and rationalization of pKa values. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 2284–2295 (2011).

  24. 24.

    & Simulating the function of sodium/proton antiporters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12378–12383 (2015).

  25. 25.

    , & Constant-pH molecular dynamics using stochastic titration. J. Chem. Phys. 117, 4184–4200 (2002).

  26. 26.

    , & Constant pH molecular dynamics in generalized Born implicit solvent. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 2038–2048 (2004).

  27. 27.

    & Enhancing conformation and protonation state sampling of hen egg white lysozyme using pH replica exchange molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 4393–4404 (2012).

  28. 28.

    , , & Constant pH molecular dynamics in explicit solvent with enveloping distribution sampling and Hamiltonian exchange. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 2738–2750 (2014).

  29. 29.

    , , & Recent development and application of constant pH molecular dynamics. Mol. Simul. 40, 830–838 (2014).

  30. 30.

    et al. Multiscale simulations of protein landscapes: using coarse-grained models as reference potentials to full explicit models. Proteins 78, 1212–1227 (2010).

  31. 31.

    , & Constant-pH molecular dynamics using continuous titration coordinates. Proteins 56, 738–752 (2004).

  32. 32.

    & Constant pH molecular dynamics with proton tautomerism. Biophys. J. 89, 141–157 (2005).

  33. 33.

    & Continuous constant pH molecular dynamics in explicit solvent with pH-based replica exchange. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 2617–2629 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Ion-channel entrances influence permeation netcharge, shape, and binding considerations. Biophys. J. 49, 607–618 (1986).

  35. 35.

    , & Pore architecture and ion sites in acid-sensing ion channels and P2X receptors. Nature 460, 599–604 (2009).

  36. 36.

    et al. Mechanism of Na+/H+ antiporting. Science 317, 799–803 (2007).

  37. 37.

    , & MCCE analysis of the pKas of introduced buried acids and bases in staphylococcal nuclease. Proteins 79, 3306–3319 (2011).

  38. 38.

    & What are the dielectric constants of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? Proteins 44, 400–417 (2001).

  39. 39.

    , & Thermodynamic coupling of protonation and conformational equilibria in proteins: theory and simulation. Biophys. J. 102, 1590–1597 (2012).

  40. 40.

    , & Generalized Born model with a simple smoothing function. J. Comput. Chem. 24, 1691–1702 (2003).

  41. 41.

    et al. Toward accurate prediction of pKa values for internal protein residues: the importance of conformational relaxation and desolvation energy. Proteins 79, 3364–3373 (2011).

  42. 42.

    , , , & Predicting proton titration in cationic micelle and bilayer environments. J. Chem. Phys. 141, 084714 (2014).

  43. 43.

    & Using a charging coordinate in studies of ionization induced partial unfolding. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 11566–11570 (2006).

  44. 44.

    , & Conformational relaxation and water penetration coupled to ionization of internal groups in proteins. J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 4042–4053 (2011).

  45. 45.

    , & A hydrophobic gating mechanism for nanopores. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 12902–12905 (2001).

  46. 46.

    & The influence of geometry, surface character, and flexibility on the permeation of ions and water through biological pores. Phys. Biol. 1, 42–52 (2004).

  47. 47.

    , & Hydrophobic gating in ion channels. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 121–130 (2015).

  48. 48.

    , , , & Structure and transport mechanism of the sodium/proton antiporter MjNhaP1. eLife 3, e03583 (2014).

  49. 49.

    et al. CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder toward realistic biological membrane simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 35, 1997–2004 (2014).

  50. 50.

    et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 1545–1614 (2009).

  51. 51.

    & Toward the accurate first-principles prediction of ionization equilibria in proteins. Biochemistry 45, 9363–9373 (2006).

  52. 52.

    , & An implicit membrane generalized Born theory for the study of structure, stability, and interactions of membrane proteins. Biophys. J. 85, 2900–2918 (2003).

  53. 53.

    & pH-dependent population shift regulates BACE1 activity and inhibition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 9543–9546 (2015).

  54. 54.

    et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586–3616 (1998).

  55. 55.

    , & Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1400–1415 (2004).

  56. 56.

    et al. Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 7830–7843 (2010).

  57. 57.

    , & Balancing solvation and intramolecular interactions: toward a consistent generalized Born force field. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 3728–3736 (2006).

  58. 58.

    , & Automated builder and database of protein/membrane complexes for molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS ONE 2, e880 (2007).

  59. 59.

    Canonical dynamics: equilibration phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985).

  60. 60.

    , , & Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4613–4621 (1995).

  61. 61.

    , & Particle mesh Ewald: an N log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).

  62. 62.

    et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29, 845–854 (2013).

  63. 63.

    , , , & Solving Software Challenges for Exascale, chap. Tackling Exascale Software Challenges in Molecular Dynamics Simulations with GROMACS 3–27Springer (2015).

  64. 64.

    & Potential energy functions for atomic-level simulations of water and organic and biomolecular systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6665–66670 (2005).

  65. 65.

    & United atom lipid parameters for combination with the pptimized potentials for liquid simulations all-atom force field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 1803–1813 (2009).

  66. 66.

    et al. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ1 and χ2 dihedral angles. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3257–3273 (2012).

  67. 67.

    & Simulation of osmotic pressure in concentrated aqueous salt solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 183–189 (2010).

  68. 68.

    & Structure and dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E water models at 298 K. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9954–9960 (2001).

  69. 69.

    , & VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Drs Klaus Fendler and Alexander Cameron for discussions and comments on the manuscript. Financial support is provided by National Institutes of Health (R01GM098818) and National Science Foundation (MCB1305560) to J.S. D.L.D. was supported by a Molecular Imaging Corporation Endowment Fellowship and a Summer University Graduate Fellowship from the Department of Physics at Arizona State University. Computer simulations were run on the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), which is supported by US National Science Foundation grant OCI-1053575 (allocation TG-MCB130177 to O.B.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA

    • Yandong Huang
    • , Wei Chen
    •  & Jana Shen
  2. Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA

    • David L. Dotson
    •  & Oliver Beckstein
  3. Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA

    • Oliver Beckstein

Authors

  1. Search for Yandong Huang in:

  2. Search for Wei Chen in:

  3. Search for David L. Dotson in:

  4. Search for Oliver Beckstein in:

  5. Search for Jana Shen in:

Contributions

J.S. and O.B. designed the research. Y.H. performed the CpHMD simulations. D.L.D. performed the conventional MD simulations. Y.H., W.C. and J.S. performed analysis of the CpHMD data. D.L.D. and O.B. performed analysis of the conventional MD data. W.C., Y.H. and J.S. wrote the paper. O.B. helped write the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana Shen.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1-20, Supplementary Tables 1-2, Supplementary Notes 1-2 and Supplementary References

  2. 2.

    Peer review file

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BYThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/