Article

Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity

Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Protecting the world’s freshwater resources requires diagnosing threats over a broad range of scales, from global to local. Here we present the first worldwide synthesis to jointly consider human and biodiversity perspectives on water security using a spatial framework that quantifies multiple stressors and accounts for downstream impacts. We find that nearly 80% of the world’s population is exposed to high levels of threat to water security. Massive investment in water technology enables rich nations to offset high stressor levels without remedying their underlying causes, whereas less wealthy nations remain vulnerable. A similar lack of precautionary investment jeopardizes biodiversity, with habitats associated with 65% of continental discharge classified as moderately to highly threatened. The cumulative threat framework offers a tool for prioritizing policy and management responses to this crisis, and underscores the necessity of limiting threats at their source instead of through costly remediation of symptoms in order to assure global water security for both humans and freshwater biodiversity.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:

    $199

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Change history

  • Corrected online 30 September 2010

    In the PDF version of this Article, the present address for P. B. McIntyre was truncated; this had now been corrected

References

  1. 1.

    Global analysis of river systems: from Earth system controls to Anthropocene syndromes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (2003)

  2. 2.

    World Water Assessment Programme. Water in a Changing World. The United Nations World Water Development Report 3 (UNESCO, 2009)

  3. 3.

    et al. in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Vol. 1, Ch. 7, 165–207 (Island Press, 2005)

  4. 4.

    Karl T. R., Melillo J. M., Peterson T. C., eds. Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009)

  5. 5.

    Framing Committee of the Global Water System Project. Humans transforming the global water system. Eos AGU Trans. 85, 513–514 (2004)

  6. 6.

    United Nations Development Programme. HDR 2006—Beyond Scarcity: Power, Poverty and the Global Water Crisis (UNDP, 2006)

  7. 7.

    et al. Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 58, 403–414 (2008)

  8. 8.

    International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2009. 1 〈〉 (2009)

  9. 9.

    Convention on Biological Diversity. Text of the Convention on Biological Diversity 〈〉 (2004)

  10. 10.

    United Nations Environment Programme. Report of the third ad hoc intergovernmental and multi-stakeholder meeting on an intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. UNEP/IPBES/3/3. (2010)

  11. 11.

    Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science 302, 1524–1528 (2003)

  12. 12.

    & Targeting attention on local vulnerabilities using an integrated index approach: the example of the Climate Vulnerability Index. Water Sci. Technol. 51, 69–78 (2005)

  13. 13.

    et al. The 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship (Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, 2005)

  14. 14.

    et al. The Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index Report (Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy and CIESIN, 2006)

  15. 15.

    , , & Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289, 284–288 (2000)

  16. 16.

    et al. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319, 948–952 (2008)

  17. 17.

    et al. Global priority areas for incorporating land–sea connections in marine conservation. Conser. Lett. 2, 189–196 (2009)

  18. 18.

    et al. The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52, 891–904 (2002)

  19. 19.

    Food and Agriculture Organization. Water Monitoring: Mapping Existing Global Systems & Initiatives (FAO, 2006)

  20. 20.

    Global water assessment and potential contributions from earth systems science. Aquat. Sci. 64, 328–351 (2002)

  21. 21.

    et al. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 81, 163–182 (2006)

  22. 22.

    , , & Geospatial indicators of emerging water stress: an application to Africa. Ambio 34, 230–236 (2005)

  23. 23.

    , & Scaling gridded river networks for macroscale hydrology: development, analysis, and control of error. Wat. Resour. Res. 37, 1955–1967 (2001)

  24. 24.

    US-Environmental Protection Agency. The Quality of Our Nation’s Waters. EPA-841-R-02–001 (US EPA, 2000)

  25. 25.

    Ministry of Environmental Protection. The State of the Environment of China in 2008〉 (Ministry of Environmental Protection, The People’s Republic of China, 2009)

  26. 26.

    UNEP GEMS/Water Programme. Water Quality for Ecosystem and Human Health 2nd edn (UNEP GEMS/Water Programme, 2008)

  27. 27.

    , , , & Sources and delivery of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus to the coastal zone: an overview of Global Nutrient Export from Watersheds (NEWS) models and their application. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB4S01 (2005)

  28. 28.

    World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Freshwater Biodiversity: a Preliminary Global Assessment. WCMC Biodiversity Series No. 8 (World Conservation Press, 1998)

  29. 29.

    & Restoration of ecosystem services for environmental markets. Science 325, 575–576 (2009)

  30. 30.

    & The impacts of change on the long-term future demand for water sector infrastructure. In: Infrastructure to 2030: Telecom, Land Transport, Water and Electricity Ch. 5 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2006)

  31. 31.

    WHO/UNICEF. Progress on Sanitation and Drinking-Water: 2010 Update. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (World Health Organisation/UNICEF, 2010)

  32. 32.

    & Water for Growth and Development. Thematic Documents of the IV World Water Forum (Comisión Nacional del Agua: México, 2006)

  33. 33.

    Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol. Econ. 49, 431–455 (2004)

  34. 34.

    The Global Environmental Facility. Financing the Stewardship of Global Biodiversity (GEF, 2008)

  35. 35.

    et al. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164–1168 (2010)

  36. 36.

    & Global biodiversity decline of marine and freshwater fish: a cross-national analysis of economic, demographic, and ecological influences. Soc. Sci. Res. 37, 1310–1320 (2008)

  37. 37.

    Tockner K., Uehlinger U., Robinson C. T., eds. Rivers of Europe (Academic, 2009)

  38. 38.

    , , & The freshwater animal diversity assessment: an overview of the results. Hydrobiologia 595, 627–637 (2008)

  39. 39.

    & Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conserv. Biol. 13, 1220–1222 (1999)

  40. 40.

    & Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes (Kottelat and Freyhof, 2007)

  41. 41.

    et al. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33, 372–407 (2008)

  42. 42.

    & Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 29, 344–358 (2010)

  43. 43.

    et al. Are we now living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today 18, 4–8 (2008)

  44. 44.

    , & The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? AMBIO 36, 614–621 (2007)

  45. 45.

    et al. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313, 58–61 (2006)

  46. 46.

    et al. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being—Synthesis Report (World Resources Institute, 2005)

  47. 47.

    & Rising Temperatures, Rising Tensions: Climate Change and the Risk of Violent Conflict in the Middle East (International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2009)

  48. 48.

    World Commission on Dams. Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making (Earthscan, 2000)

  49. 49.

    , , & The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 16, 1311–1318 (2006)

  50. 50.

    Country Classifications〉 (2010 05 17)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. DeSherbinin, L. Poff, C. Revenga, J. Melillo and O. Young for comments on the manuscript; D. Allan, R. Abell, J. Bogardi, M. Meybeck, W. Wollheim, R. F. Wright, D. Boswell, R. Lacey, N. Schneider and D. Vörösmarty for advice; and D. Dube and B. Fekete for technical support. Grant support for database and tool development was from NASA Inter-Disciplinary Science Program Grant NNX07AF28G, with additional support from the NSF Division of Earth Sciences (Hydrologic Sciences Program Award #0854957) and Global Environment Facility (UPI 00345306). P.B.M. was supported by a D.H. Smith Fellowship. Financial and logistical support for expert group meetings and communications was from the Global Water System Project (Bonn), DIVERSITAS-freshwaterBIODIVERSITY (Paris), NSF BestNet, and Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) through the Australian Water Research Facility. Conference facilities were provided by the Swiss Federal Institute of Science & Technology (Eawag) and The City College of New York/CUNY.

Author information

Author notes

    • C. J. Vörösmarty
    •  & P. B. McIntyre

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    • P. B. McIntyre

    Present address: Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.

Affiliations

  1. The Environmental CrossRoads Initiative, City University of New York, The City College of New York, New York, New York 10035, USA

    • C. J. Vörösmarty
    •  & P. Green
  2. School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

    • P. B. McIntyre
  3. Department of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, and Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), ETH Zurich, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland and Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), 16775 Stechlin, Germany

    • M. O. Gessner
  4. Division of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

    • D. Dudgeon
  5. Water Systems Analysis Group, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA

    • A. Prusevich
    •  & S. Glidden
  6. Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia

    • S. E. Bunn
  7. School of Environmental Science and Management, Southern Cross University, New South Wales 2480, Australia

    • C. A. Sullivan
  8. School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

    • C. Reidy Liermann
  9. Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, The University of Western Australia, Albany 6330, Australia

    • P. M. Davies

Authors

  1. Search for C. J. Vörösmarty in:

  2. Search for P. B. McIntyre in:

  3. Search for M. O. Gessner in:

  4. Search for D. Dudgeon in:

  5. Search for A. Prusevich in:

  6. Search for P. Green in:

  7. Search for S. Glidden in:

  8. Search for S. E. Bunn in:

  9. Search for C. A. Sullivan in:

  10. Search for C. Reidy Liermann in:

  11. Search for P. M. Davies in:

Contributions

All authors contributed to project conceptualization during workshops led by C.J.V. C.J.V. designed the global analysis, and P.B.M., A.P., P.G. and M.O.G. designed and implemented the analytical approach with essential input from S.E.B., D.D., C.A.S., P.M.D. and C.R.L. A.P., P.G. and S.G. developed the database and mapping tools. Several authors led a separate component of data set development and all provided quality assurance. C.J.V., P.B.M. and M.O.G. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. J. Vörösmarty.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables 1-3, Supplementary Figures 1- 12 with legends, Supplementary Discussion, and additional references.