Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

NICU patient satisfaction: how you measure counts

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To examine whether the method of measuring patient satisfaction influences the results.

Study Design:

All families with NICU patients discharged home alive to parent(s) were surveyed at 2 to 42 days post discharge with two parallel surveys (mailed and phone) from August 2010 to December 2011. The responses to the same five questions on each survey were recorded and subjected to statistical analysis via paired Student’s t and Pearson correlation coefficients to see whether the two surveys yielded the same population attitudes.

Result:

Eight hundred and thirteen families were included in the study. Seven hundred and sixty three (93.8%) completed the phone survey and 237 (29.2%) completed the mail in survey. Three of the five questions yielded significantly different answers between mailed and phone responses. In addition, no significant linear correlation between mail and survey could be found for the other two questions.

Conclusion:

As no linear correlation could be found between two of the five questions, a process constant mathematical value could not be identified. This indicates that mail survey and phone survey respondents have different attitudes that cannot be adjusted because of methodological measurement effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burroughs TE, Waterman BM, Gilin D, Adams D, McCollegan J, Cira J . Do on-site patient satisfaction surveys bias results? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 31 (3): 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burroughs TE, Waterman BM, Cira JC, Desikan R, Claiborne Dunagen W . Patient satisfaction measurement strategies: a comparison of phone and mail methods. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001; 27 (7): 349–361.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jamieson S . Likert Scales: How to (Ab)use Them. Med Educ 38 (12) 2004; 1217–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Norman G . Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics. Advances in Health Science Education 2010; 15 (5): 625–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fowler FJ, Gallagher PM, Stringfellow VL, Zaslavsky AM, Thompson JW, Cleary PD . Using telephone interviews to reduce nonresponse bias to mail surveys of health plan members. Med Care 2002; 40 (3): 190–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Providence St Vincent Medical Center and the Women’s and Children’s Health Research Center for their support during this trial. This project was supported by Providence Health and Services at the Women’s and Children’s Health Research Center in Portland, Oregon.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L V Cheldelin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheldelin, L., Dunham, S. & Stewart, V. NICU patient satisfaction: how you measure counts. J Perinatol 33, 324–326 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.115

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.115

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links