Introduction

Endophytes have been proven to produce bioactive compounds and it is interesting that occasionally they yield those compounds, which are known to be produced by their host. Some anticancer endophytic secondary metabolites are, camptothecin from Entrophosphora infrequens, which is an endophytic fungus from plant bark of Nothapodytes foetida,1 vinca alkaloid vincristine isolated from Fusarium oxysporum, which is an endophyte to plant Catharanthus roseus.2 An alkaloid chaetoglobosin has been isolated from endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum IFB-E019 from plant Imperata cylindrica.3 There is a report that taxol being produced by Northwest Pacific yew endophyte.4 Other anticancer compounds from fungal endophytes include brefeldine, ergoflavin, cytochalasin, depsipeptides and many more.5 With our continuing efforts to develop anticancer drugs from natural resources, we discovered a new depsipeptide anticancer compound from Phomopsis glabrae an endophytic fungus. The purification, characterization and biological property of the compound PM181110 are described in this article.

Materials and methods

General experimental procedures

All the solvents used for extraction were of Laboratory Reagent grade, whereas HPLC grade solvents were used for analytical and preparative HPLC. Purity of the compound was established by analytical HPLC on Shimadzu LC 2010HT using Lichrospher RP-18 (125 mm × 4.6 mm), 5 μm column using acetonitrile and water as mobile phase. Normal phase column chromatography was performed on Silica gel (60–120 mesh) and TLC on Silica gel60 F254 (20 × 20 cm) aluminum sheets from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany.

The IR spectrum was recorded on Perkin Elmer (Shelton, CT, USA) FT-IR spectrometer using KBr disc. The compound was analyzed for LC-ESI HRMS on Micro QTOF from Bruker daltonics. The NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance at 500 MHz and 75 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively. DMDO-d6 was used as solvent for NMR experiments and chemical shifts were referenced the solvent peaks 2.50 p.p.m. (1H) and 39.5 p.p.m. (13C). The UV spectrum was extracted from HPLC-photodiode array analysis of compound using solvent system in acetonitrile and water.

Isolation and cultivation of the fungus

The culture PM0509732 was isolated as endophytic fungi from the leaves of Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre (family Fabaceae), was collected from Karnala Bird Sanctuary near Panvel in Raigad District, Maharashtra, India in the month of March 2005, using a previously described method.6 Potato Dextrose Agar medium was used for isolation of fungi and maintenance of the culture for identification and fermentation purpose. The fungus was a sterile mycelium hence identified based on partial sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region of rDNA using internal transcribed spacer-1 and internal transcribed spacer-4 primers.7 A nucleotide to nucleotide BLAST8 query of the gene bank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) recovered AY601918.1 Phomopsis glabrae voucher SCHM 3622 as the closest match to the internal transcribed spacer rDNA of PM0509732 (99%). Evolutionary analyses (Figure 1) were performed using MEGA6.9 Culture No. PM0509732 has been deposited with Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India, and has been given the accession number MTCC5544.

Figure 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region sequence obtained from culture PM0509732 in comparison with the nearest type strain sequences. The tree was constructed based on rRNA gene sequences (internal transcribed spacer region) using the Maximum Composite Likelihood Method.

Large-scale production of the fungus

A loop full of the well-grown culture from slant maintained on Potato dextrose agar was transferred to a 500 ml conical flask with 100 ml liquid medium containing soluble starch 1.5 g; soyabean meal 1.5 g; yeast extract 0.2 g; corn steep liquor 0.1 g; glucose 0.5 g; CaCO3 0.2 g; NaCl 0.5 g; glycerol 1.0 g in demineralized water at pH 5.5. This was grown on rotary shaker at 200 r.p.m. for 72 h at 28 °C and was used as seed medium. The medium containing glucose, 30.00 g; NaNO3, 3.00 g; K2HPO4, 1.00 g; KCl, 0.50 g; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.50 g FeSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g; demineralized water 1 l, was used for production. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.5 before sterilization. Hundred 1000 ml flasks containing 200 ml of the above medium was inoculated with 1% of the seed culture and incubated on rotary shaker at 200 r.p.m. for 72 h at 28 °C.

Purification of PM181110

A fresh 20 l fermentation batch of culture PM0509732 was processed, the whole fermented broth was filtered to separate 3 kg of biomass, which was extracted with acetone (10 l) via stirring. The organic solvent was separated from biomass through filtration and evaporated at 45 °C under reduced pressure to obtain 2.5 g crude extract.

Crude extract was subjected to normal phase chromatography and eluted with different proportion of methanol in chloroform. Fractions were screened for anticancer activity and those found active were pooled to get 400 mg semi-pure compound. The final purification was achieved by reverse phase preparative HPLC using acetonitrile and water as mobile phase in isocratic mode (4:6). The column used was Eurospher RP-18 (250 × 20 mm), 10 μm with flow rate of 20 ml min−1. UV detection was observed at 220 nm. PM181110 eluted at 11 min retention time. The eluate was concentrated at 45 °C under reduced pressure to evaporate organic solvent, and residual water containing sample was freeze dried to get 100 mg white amorphous powder (Table 1). PM181110 was characterized based on UV, IR, and various NMR experiments.

Table 1 Physiochemical properties of PM181110

In vitro assays

Monolayer assay: cell lines

Forty human tumor cell lines derived from 15 different tumor histotypes, each represented by one–six cell lines were used for the study. Cell lines were established from cancer of the bladder (3), colon (4), head and neck (1), lung (6), breast (3), pancreas (3), prostate (4), ovary (2), kidney (3), liver (1), stomach (1) and the uteri body (1), as well as from melanoma (3), sarcoma (2) and pleuramesothelioma (3). Out of these 40 cell lines, 24 cell lines were established at Oncotest, from patient-derived tumor xenografts. The other 16 cell lines were either provided by the NCI (Bethesda; MD, USA) or were purchased from ATCC (Rockville, MD, USA) or DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany). All cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum and 0.1 mg ml−1 gentamicin (medium and all other components from PAA, Cölbe, Germany). Authenticity of all cell lines was proven by STR (short tandem repeat) analysis, a PCR based DNA-fingerprinting methodology.

Monolayer proliferation and cytotoxicity assay

A modified Propidium Iodide assay was used to assess the effect of the test compound on the growth of the human tumor cell lines.10 Cells were plated in 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plates at a cell density of 4000–20 000 cells per well. After a 24 h recovery period to allow the cells to resume exponential growth, the compound PM181110 was applied at 10 concentrations in half-log increments in triplicates and treatment continued for 4 days. After 4 days of treatment, cells were next washed with 200 μl phosphate-buffered solution to remove dead cells, then 200 μl of a solution containing 7 μg ml−1 propidium iodide and 0.1%(v/v) Triton X-100 were added to the wells. After an incubation period of 1–2 h at room temperature, fluorescence was measured using the Cytofluor 4000 microplate reader (Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany) (excitation λ=530 nm, emission λ=620 nm) to quantify the amount of attached viable cells. Pharmacological effects on cell proliferation and survival were expressed as Test/Control × 100 (%T/C) values. On the basis of the T/C values, relative IC50 values were determined by non-linear regression (log[conc. of inhibitor] versus response (% T/C)) using the GraphPad Prism analysis software (Prism 5 for Windows, version 5.01, GraphPad Software, CA, USA). For calculation of mean IC50 values over the 40 cell lines as tested, the geometric mean was selected.

For mode-of-action analysis, a Compare Analysis was performed. The individual IC50 values of the test compound as obtained in Oncotest’s 40 cell line panel in the monolayer assay were correlated by a Spearman rank test to the corresponding IC50 values for 94 standard agents as determined for these 40 cell lines. These standard agents represent the main MoAs of approved and experimental anticancer drugs. Similarities between the activity pattern of a test compound and those of standard drugs are expressed quantitatively as Spearman correlation coefficients. High correlations (ρ>0.6, P<0.05) between the activity patterns of two compounds are indicative of a similar MoA.

Clonogenic assay

Antitumor efficacy on clonogenicity of tumor cells was investigated in a clonogenic assay. Tumor xenografts were derived from patient tumors engrafted as a subcutaneously growing tumor in NMRI nu/nu mice obtained from Oncotest’s breeding facility.11, 12 Details of the test procedure have been described earlier.13 Briefly, solid human tumor xenografts were removed from mice under sterile conditions, mechanically disaggregated and subsequently incubated with an enzyme cocktail consisting of collagenase type IV (41 U ml−1), DNase I (125 U ml−1), hyaluronidase type III (100 U ml−1) and dispase II (1.0 U ml−1) in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 Medium at 37 °C for 45 min. Cells were passed through sieves of 200 μm and 50 μm mesh size and washed twice with sterile phosphate-buffered solution buffer. The percentage of viable cells was determined in a Neubauer hemocytometer using trypan blue exclusion. The bottom layer consisted of 0.2 ml per well Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), supplemented with 20% (v/v) fetal calf serum (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany), 0.01% (w/v) gentamicin (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) and 0.75% (w/v) agar (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). Cells (1.5 × 104 to 4 × 104) were added to 0.2 ml of the same culture medium supplemented with 0.4% (w/v) agar and plated in 24-multiwell dishes onto the bottom layer. The test compounds were applied by continuous exposure (drug overlay) in 0.2 ml of culture medium. Every dish included six untreated control wells and drug-treated groups in triplicate at six concentrations. Cultures were incubated at 37 °C and 7.5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere for 7–20 days and monitored closely for colony growth using an inverted microscope. Within this period, in vitro tumor growth led to the formation of colonies with a diameter of >50 μm. At the time of maximum colony formation, counts were performed with an automatic image analysis system (Bioreader 5000Wα, Biosys, Karben, Germany). Twenty-four hours before evaluation, vital colonies were stained with a sterile aqueous solution of 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride (1 mg ml−1, 100 μl per well).

For testing hematopoietic stem cells, samples of human umbilical cord blood were diluted two–threefold with phosphate-buffered solution containing 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum abumin. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were enriched from the respective samples by Ficoll Paque density gradient centrifugation and washed twice with phosphate-buffered solution containing 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin. The resulting cell suspension was stored in aliquots in freezing medium at −80 °C. Aliquots were thawed for testing as appropriate. The colony forming test was performed using 24-well plates and HSC-CFU (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) as culture medium. 25 000 cells ml−1 of the above mentioned preparation were seeded in a final volume of 500 μl per well. Solutions of the test compounds were added directly to the medium. Every dish included six untreated control wells and drug-treated groups in triplicate at five concentrations. Three wells of the test plate were filled with 1 ml of sterile water to ensure that maximum humidity was attained during the subsequent incubation period. Cultures were incubated at 37 °C and 7.5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere for 12 days. Colony growth was evaluated using an inverted microscope.

Xenograft models and in vivo efficacy testing

The bladder cancer xenograft BXF 1218 was established at Oncotest GmbH from primary patient material after the informed consent of the patient. Tumor pieces were implanted subcutaneously and four mice per group were randomized after reaching tumor volumes of about 50–250 mm3. Mice were treated with 1.0, 0.5 and 0.25 mg kg−1 PM181110 i.p. on days 0 (randomization), 4 and 8 and the vehicle control was 30% dimethyl sulfoxide/70% (10% cremophor EL/90% aai). Tumor sizes were measured twice weekly until study day 11. The treatment versus control (T/C (%)) values were calculated by using the median relative tumor volumes. Optimal T/C values were used to assess PM181110 response. All studies were performed in agreement with animal welfare acts in Germany.

Results and discussion

The mycelium of the fungus Phomopsis glabrae was extracted with acetone. The resulting acetone extract was dried and chromatographed on silica gel followed by preparative HPLC to yield PM181110 (Figure 2). The compound PM181110 was characterized by spectroscopic data analysis (Table 2) (UV, 1H NMR, 13CNMR and LC/MS, Supplementary Figures S1–S5).

Figure 2
figure 2

Structure with HMBC and COSY correlations of PM181110 and structure of FE 399.

Table 2 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) and 1H NMR ( DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) data of PM181110 and 13C NMR of FE399 (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz)

13C NMR indicated amide functional groups and were assigned to δ 174.1 and 173.9. Additional signal at 169.4 was attributed to a lactone group. Signals 74.5 and 70.3 were attributed to two CH–O chemical bond in the compound. Two carbon signals at 52.0 and 51.2 were assigned for two CH–N linkages. Remaining carbons were assigned for methylene and terminal methyl groups. The DEPT-135 indicated four CH, ten CH2, one CH3 spin system. The methyl group was a terminal one having a triplet in 1H NMR. The two CH2 protons located at disulfide bond were found to have COSY correlation with their adjacent protons. COSY correlations were established between δ 4.04 and 1.64, 1.41, indicated the presence of C-OH moiety adjacent to methylene group. 13C NMR data showed sets of carbon signals due to tautomeric equilibrium of PM181110, which is also reported for FE399. 1H NMR data indicated two hetero atoms attached proton at 8.87 and 8.16, which were confirmed by D2O exchange. Two proton signals at 4.98 and 4.04 were attributed to CH–O functionalities. Important HBMC correlations have been shown in the structure of PM181110. The structure was well supported by NMR experiments like HSQC, HMBC and COSY spectra. The different conformers of PM181110 could be seen depending on solvent and temperature. This observation was also established by two sets of carbon signals. The isolated compound has also been compared with similar class of compound antitumour antibiotic FE399.14

In vitro antitumor activity of PM181110 in a panel of 40 human tumor cell lines

PM181110 was investigated in a panel of 40 human tumor cell lines, comprising 15 different tumor histotypes, each represented one to six cell lines. PM181110 showed concentration-dependent activity in all cell lines as tested, that is, cell lines derived from bladder, colon, gastric, head and neck, liver, lung (non-small-cell lung carcinoma), mammary, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, renal and uterus cancer, as well as melanoma, pleuramesothelioma and sarcoma (Table 3). The overall very strong antitumor potency was evident from a mean IC50 value of 0.089 μM with individual IC50 values in the range from 16 nM to 0.323 μM As shown in Table 4, above-average sensitivity was particularly found in cell lines derived from bladder (two out of three tested bladder cancer cell lines with individual IC50<mean IC50), colon (3/4), lung (5/6) and pancreatic cancer (3/3). Mainly, the activity towards the 5/6 cell lines derived from lung carcinoma (individual IC500.05 μM) and towards the 3/3 pancreatic tumor cell lines (individual IC50<0.06 μM) is to be highlighted. The most sensitive cell lines towards PM181110 were found to be the pancreatic cancer cell line PAXF 546L (IC50=0.016 μM) and the lung cancer cell line LXFA 526L (IC50=0.021 μM). Compare Analysis revealed no significant correlations to any of the reference compounds (Spearman correlation coefficient ρ<0.4) indicated that the mode-of-action of PM181110 was not represented by the reference compounds used for Compare Analysis.

Table 3 In vitro antitumor activity of PM181110 in a panel of 40 human tumor cell lines
Table 4 In vitro antitumor activity of PM181110 towards cell lines derived from selected tumor histotypes

Ex vivo antitumor efficacy of PM18110 in a panel of 24 human tumor xenografts

Inhibition of clonogenicity of tumor cells was evaluated in additional tumor models using a clonogenic assay. The antiproliferative activity of PM181110 was evaluated in cell suspensions prepared from 24 human tumor xenografts of 13 different histotypes, which were cultured as solid tumors in serial passage on immune deficient nude mice. In addition, PM181110 was tested in two preparations of hematopoietic stem cells as a model system for non-malignant tissue. IC50 values in the clonogenic assays using tumor cell suspensions ranged from 0.03 μM to 0.422 μM (geometric mean IC50=0.245 μM). Colony formation of hematopoietic stem cells derived from cord blood was inhibited by with IC50 values of 0.26 μM and 0.746 μM, respectively (Table 5). The bladder cancer BXF 1218 (IC50=0.03 μM) was identified to be the most sensitive tumor model.

Table 5 Ex vivo antitumor efficacy of PM181110 in a panel of 24 human tumor xenografts using a clonogenic assay

In vivo antitumor efficacy of PM18110 in human tumor xenografts

Four mice per group were randomized when tumor volume of the bladder cancer xenografts BXF 1218 was around 50–250 mm3. Vehicle-treated tumors grew fast (doubling time=1.6 days) and had to be killed after 11 days due to tumor burden of around 1700 mm3. PM181110 was given i.p. at dose levels of 1.0, 0.5 and 0.25 mg kg−1 on days 0, 4 and 8. At a dose of 1.0 mg kg−1, a test/control value of 31% was achieved with 11% body weight loss. The other two doses were well tolerated but showed no antitumor activity. It is expected that optimization of formulation and dose regimen would help to improve the efficacy of the molecule.