Introduction

Bacterial diseases can result in many serious or life-threatening complications, such as blood poisoning (bacteremia), kidney failure and toxic shock syndrome. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus represent exemplary model organisms for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria that can induce numerous diseases.1, 2 Broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents can eradicate these diseases, but can also result in drug resistance and severe side effects.3

Pharmacologically, alkaloids represent one of the most important classes of nitrogenous compounds with organic heterocyclic ring, possessing antibacterial, antifungal, insecticidal, antiviral, anticancer, antimalarial, antiinflammatory and antiaging activities.4 For example, berberine and ephedrine are effective to cure bacterial and inflammatory infections and asthma.5, 6 Depending on the different compositions and structures of compounds, alkaloids can be classified as pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA-1), quinoline alkaloid, indole alkaloid, quinazolone alkaloid and so on.

PA-1, which own antibacterial activity, act as a constitutive plant defense mechanism and form a large group of plant secondary chemicals.7 However, the occurrence of human abuse, environmental pollution and changes of climate has resulted in the sharp decrease of natural resource. Therefore, biosynthesis, semisynthesis and total synthesis of PA-1 are in the center of interest. It is desirable to develop a new strategy for the efficient construction of the azabicyclic skeleton from simple acyclic starting materials in a single step.8 An organocatalytic domino reaction of 1,4-dien-3-ones with ethyl isocyanoacetate that allowed the formation of three C-C and one C-N bonds in a regio- and diastereoselective manner in a single reaction were used to synthesize a series of novel PA-1. PA-1, which showed strong antibacterial activity, was used to systematically study the antibacterial mechanism of PA-1 derivatives, providing a novel antibacterial drug candidate.

The aim of this work was to investigate the antimicrobial activity and mechanism of a novel PA-1 (Figure 1), which was synthetized by organocatalytic domino reaction.9 Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values of PA-1 were determined against eight microorganisms. The time-kill kinetics of E. coli and S. aureus treated with PA-1 were also studied. In addition, flow cytometry (FCM) was used to test the inhibition rates of E. coli and S. aureus. The cell integrity measurement, crystal violet assay, fluorescence microscopy assay and membrane potential (MP) analyses were carried out to analyze changes of membrane permeability. To find the targets on cytoplasmic membrane, the effects of lecithin and phosphate groups on the antibacterial activity of PA-1 were investigated.

Figure 1
figure 1

The chemical structure of a novel synthesized pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA-1).

Materials and methods

Materials

PA-1 (purity >99%) was provided by Department of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, China. Penicillin, chloramphenicol and erythromycin (all purity >99%) were used as positive control and were purchased from the Sigma Chemical (St Louis, MO, USA). Propidium iodide (PI), crystal violet and 3, 3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide were obtained from Sigma Chemicals (Shanghai, China). Yolk lecithin was purchased from Sigma Chemicals.

Microorganisms and culture conditions

S. epidermidis (ATCC 12228), S. aureus (ATCC 6538), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633), E. coli (ATCC 8739), Proteus vulgaris (ATCC 49132), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), Aspergillus niger (ATCC 16404) and Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) were obtained from the Institute of Applied Microbiology, Heilongjiang Academy of Science (China). They were maintained on an agar slant at 4 °C and cultured on nutrient agar or potato dextrose agar at 37 or 25 °C for 24 h.

Antimicrobial activity

Bacterial cells (105 CFU ml−1) were inoculated into a nutrient broth at 0.1 ml per well, in 96-well microtiter plates. MICs were determined by microtiter broth dilution method based on the guidelines in the literature.10 The stock solution of PA-1 was 1 mg ml−1 in 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide and the required concentrations for experiments were prepared from this. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C, the minimal concentration of PA-1 to prevent the growth of the given test organisms was defined as MIC. Fungal cells (105 CFU ml−1) were inoculated in yeast extract peptone dextrose broth (0.1 ml per well) in microtiter plates. After the determination of MIC, 10 μl mixtures from the wells with no growth were spread on agar plates for MBC determination. Penicillin, chloramphenicol and erythromycin were used as positive control. All determinations were performed by three independent assays.

Time-kill dynamics

Time-kill dynamics of E. coli and S. aureus treated with PA-1 (corresponding to control, 1/2 × MIC, MIC and 2 × MIC) were studied based on the number of viable cells determined through a colony-counting method in plates.11 Time-kill curves were constructed by plotting log10CFU ml−1 against time (h). All the determinations above were done in triplicates.

FCM analysis

E. coli and S. aureus were cultured in a nutrient broth with aeration for 24 h at 37 °C. Different concentrations of PA-1 (corresponding to MIC and MBC) were added to cells for 8 h. Untreated bacteria were used as control. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 8000 r.p.m. for 10 min at 25 °C, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline buffer (50 mM; pH 7.0), and subsequently resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline to obtain a final concentration of 10log10CFU ml−1. Then, PI (100 μg ml−1) was added and incubated in the dark for 15 min. Samples were measured by using the FL-3 channels of a FCM (Partec GmbH, PAS, Germany). The inhibition rates of PA-1-treated bacteria were determined according to the fluorescence intensity.12

Membrane permeability

Integrity of cell membrane

Cell membrane integrity of E. coli and S. aureus was examined by measuring the release of ultraviolet (UV)-absorbing materials at 260 nm.13 Bacterial cultures grown in nutrient broth were collected by centrifugation at 8000 r.p.m. for 10 min, washed and resuspended in 0.5% NaCl solution. Different concentrations of PA-1 (MIC and MBC) were added. Cells without PA-1 treatment were treated as control. The release of materials absorbing at 260 nm over time was monitored with a UV–visible spectrophotometer. All the measurements were done in triplicates.

Crystal violet assay

The alteration of membrane permeability of E. coli and S. aureus was investigated by crystal violet assay.14 Bacterial cultures grown in nutrient broth were collected by centrifugation at 9300 g for 5 min, washed and resuspended in 0.5% NaCl solution. PA-1 (1/2MIC, MIC, 2MIC and 4MIC) was added and incubated at 37 °C for 8 h. Control samples were prepared similarly without PA-1 treatment. Cells were collected at 9300 g for 5 min and then resuspended in 0.5% NaCl solution containing 10 μg ml−1 crystal violet. After incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, the suspension was then centrifuged at 13 400 g for 15 min and the OD590 of the supernatant was measured by a UV–visible spectrophotometer. The OD values of the crystal violet initial solution used in the assay were investigated and considered as 100%. All the determinations above were done in triplicates. The percentages of crystal violet uptake were calculated using the following formula: (OD value of the sample)/(OD value of crystal violet solution) × 100.

Fluorescence microscopy assay

The red fluorescent nucleic acid stain (PI) was used to detect the damages of cell membrane. Three milliliters of the dye (1 mg ml−1) was added to 1 ml bacterial suspension (treated by PA-1 at MIC and MBC), mixed thoroughly and kept in the dark for 15 min. Then, 10 μl of the stained bacterial suspension was placed between a slide and a coverslip. A XSP-13 fluorescence microscope was used to observe the stained bacteria at a magnification of × 40 and evaluate bacterial membrane integrity.15

Measurement of MP

3, 3′-Dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide was used to measure the changes of MP.16 E. coli and S. aureus cells were mixed with different concentrations of PA-1 (corresponding to MIC and MBC) and incubated for 8 h. Untreated bacteria were used as control. Cells were subsequently collected and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline buffer. Then suspensions were incubated with 0.5 μM 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide for 10 min in the dark and analyzed by FCM (PARTEC). All the tests were done in triplicates.

Effect of lecithin and phosphate groups on the antibacterial activity

Effect of lecithin on the antibacterial activity was determined as previously described.17 Yolk lecithin was dissolved in alcohol to prepare the lecithin solution. PA-1 was added with a mass ratio of 1:0.2, 1:1 and 1:5 to lecithin. The mixtures were magnetically stirred overnight and then kept under vacuum for 60 min to remove the alcohol. Two controls were used in this experiment. A defined amount of lecithin-untreated PA-1 was served as control I and the blank culture medium was treated as control II. Test and control groups were inoculated under aseptic conditions with 50 μl of inocula of bacteria, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, the turbidity of the cultured medium was measured using a UV–visible spectrophotometer at 610 nm. Effect of phosphate groups on the antibacterial activity was measured in a similar way as that of lecithin. All determinations were performed in triplicates.

Results and Discussion

Antimicrobial activities of PA-1

The antimicrobial activities of PA-1 were tested toward eight strains by microtiter broth dilution method. In the case of Gram-positive bacteria, MIC values of PA-1 were 0.0078, 0.0039 and 0.0156 mg ml−1 against S. epidermidis, S. aureus and B. subtilis, respectively. In the case of Gram-negative bacteria, MIC values were 0.0313 mg ml−1 against E. coli, P. vulgaris and P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, MIC values of PA-1 against fungi were 0.125 and 0.0625 mg ml−1 against A. niger and C. albicans, respectively (Table 1). MBCs of PA-1 were from 0.0078 to 0.0625 mg ml−1 against six tested bacteria. It could be inferred from our results that PA-1 markedly inhibited the growth of Gram-positive bacteria and was more effective to S. aureus. The MICs and MBCs of PA-1 toward all Gram-negative bacteria were the same. In comparison with penicillin as positive control, PA-1 showed comparative antimicrobial activity against S. epidermidis, S. aureus, A. niger and C. albicans. With regard to chloramphenicol, PA-1 possessed the comparative antimicrobial activity against almost all pathogens tested in the assay. Meanwhile, PA-1 had comparative antibacterial activity against S. epidermidis, S. aureus and higher antibacterial activity toward E. coli and B. subtilis when compared with erythromycin.

Table 1 MICs and MBCs (mg ml−1) of PA-1 against microorganisms

As we have known, alkaloid has been known to possess antimicrobial activity and alkaloid berberine inhibiting the growth of bacteria by damaging the cell membrane is a basic antibacterial mechanism.18 Both PA-1 and berberrine are alkaloids and our results showed that PA-1 possessed stronger activity to Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, which was similar with berberine. These differences of antibacterial activity were probably due to differences on membrane structure and composition among Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi.19, 20 In order to test whether an agent has bacteriostatic or bactericidal properties, it is necessary to study the potential action mode in vitro. On the basis of this, E. coli and S. aureus were chosen as the representative Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria for the research of antibacterial mechanism.

Effect of PA-1 on the death rate of E. coli and S. aureus

On the basis of the results of MIC and MBC assay, time-kill curves of E. coli and S. aureus in relation to time and drug concentration were obtained. As can be seen from Figure 2, three concentrations of PA-1 with 2MIC, MIC and 1/2MIC were tested for the ability to kill E. coli and S. aureus, within 24 h. It showed that low concentrations of PA-1 were not sufficient to kill E. coil and S. aureus. At 2MIC (MBC), it had a lethal effect and prolonged antibacterial activity within 8 h (Figure 2). Figure 2 also verified a significant concentration and time-dependent correlation for the bacteriostatic activity of PA-1 against both E. coil and S. aureus.

Figure 2
figure 2

Time-kill kinetics of pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA-1) against E. coli (a) and S. aureus (b). The concentrations used correspond to 1/2 minimal inhibitory concentration) MIC, MIC and 2MIC (minimum bactericidal concentrations; MBC); the control did not contain compounds or antibiotics.

FCM analysis

Flow cytometric data were allowed to estimate the impact of PA-1 on bacterial viability and cell membrane damage. After 8 h treatment, the dead cell fraction of E. coli increased from 3.60 to 97.80% with the increased concentration of PA-1 (Figures 3a and b). The inhibition rates of S. aureus were 1.16, 61.68 and 96.24% for control, MIC and MBC treatment, respectively (Figures 3c and d). These results were in general agreement with the time-kill dynamics shown in Figure 2. As far as we know, when cell membrane is damaged, PI that is a membrane-impermeable nucleic-acid fluorescent stain would be allowed to penetrate in and strongly fluoresces by binding to DNA and RNA.21 Bacteria in gate 4 that represented the membrane-damaged cells were increased when the concentration of PA-1 was changed from MIC to MBC. Hence, membranes of E. coli and S. aureus were destroyed after PA-1 treatment and this was in accordance with the results of Paparella et al.22

Figure 3
figure 3figure 3

(a) Flow cytometry (FCM) histograms of E. coli grown in the presence of pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA-1) stained with propidium iodide (PI). a1, a2: untreated control; a3, a4: treatment with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) PA-1; a5, a6: treatment with minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) PA-1. (b) FCM histograms of E. coli grown in the presence of PA-1. (c) FCM histograms of S. aureus grown in the presence of PA-1 stained with propidium iodide (PI). c1, c2: untreated control; c3, c4: treatment with MIC PA-1; c5, c6: treatment with MBC PA-1. (d) FCM histograms of S. aureus grown in the presence of PA-1. A full color version of this figure is available at The Journal of Antibiotics journal online.

Effect of PA-1 on membrane permeability

The antimicrobial activity of PA-1 against pathogenic bacteria has been reported, but no any action mode has been reported. For many antibacterial agents, the possible targets of action might be cell wall, cytoplasmic membrane, protein, nucleic acid and metabolic pathways. In order to further explore the antibacterial mode of PA-1 toward E. coil and S. aureus, membrane integrity measurement, crystal violet staining determination, fluorescence microscopy assay and MP analyses were used as methods for our investigation.

Effect of PA-1 on leakage of 260 nm absorbing materials from E. coli and S. aureus

As a structural component, the cytoplasmic cell membrane is an undoubted target for many antibacterial agents. If bacterial membrane became damaged, low-MW species such as K+ and PO4 would leach out first, and then followed by nucleotides such as DNA, RNA and other materials. These intracellular components are easily detected by the UV absorption at 260 nm as an emblem of membrane damage.23

Effect of PA-1 on leakage of 260 nm absorbing materials from E. coli and S. aureus was shown in Figure 4A. In case of E. coli, the suspension absorbance at 260 nm increased slowly over time and was almost unchanged after 12 h (Figure 4Aa). By comparison, the release rate of intracellular components increased as soon as PA-1 was mixed with S. aureus and increased abruptly to the maximum degree at 4 h (Figure 4Ab). This result might probably attribute to the differences on membrane structure and composition of the two bacteria. Owing to the presence of lipopolysaccharide molecule, all Gram-negative bacteria possess an outer membrane that has a role as a drug barrier, whereas for the Gram-positive S. aureus, foreign molecules can enter the cell without difficulty because peptidoglycan layer of the cell wall is composed of networks with plenty of pores.24 In addition, at the same treatment time, A260 values of E. coli and S. aureus were higher at MBC than MIC. These results suggested that PA-1 damaged cytoplasmic membranes and caused subsequent leakage of intracellular constituents.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA-1) on membrane permeability. (A) Presence of 260 nm absorbing material in the supernatants of E. coli (a) and S. aureus (b) treated with PA-1 (minimal inhibitory concentration; MIC and minimum bactericidal concentrations; MBC). The mean±s.d. for three replicates are illustrated. (B) Crystal violet uptake of PA-1 (1/2MIC, MIC, 2MIC, 4MIC) treated E. coli and S. aureus. The mean±s.d. for three replicates are illustrated. (C) Fluorescence microscopy of E. coli (a–c) and S. aureus (d–f) and treated with PA-1. The fluorescence emission is in green light. (D) Analysis of E. coli (a) and S. aureus (b), collected at the exponential phase of growth and stained with the carbocyanine dye 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DiOC6) after treatment of PA-1. Abscissa 1: DiOC6-mediated fluorescence intensity, abscissa 2: the numbers indicated are related to increasing concentrations of PA-1, ordinate: cell counts. A full color version of this figure is available at The Journal of Antibiotics journal online.

Effect of PA-1 on the alteration of membrane permeability of E. coli and S. aureus

Crystal violet penetrates the membrane poorly, but it enters easily as soon as the membrane is defective.25 The uptake of crystal violet by E. coli was 24.52% in the absence of PA-1 and increased up to 53.79 and 97.12% after MIC and 4MIC treatment, respectively. At the same time, crystal violet uptake of S. aureus increased from 19.68% in the absence of PA-1 to 67.61 and 97.63% after MIC and 4MIC treatment, respectively (Figure 4B). When compared with the control, a significant enhancement in the uptake of crystal violet was observed in E. coil and S. aureus after PA-1 treatment. This result demonstrated the changes of membrane permeability of PA-1-treated E. coil and S. aureus.

Fluorescence microscopy analysis

The emission range of PI is 620–650 nm and PI-stained cells can emit red fluorescence light in green fluorescence light. Membrane damage induced by PA-1 was studied with fluorescence microscopy. As shown in Figure 4C, untreated E. coli and S. aureus showed weak red light fluorescence in green light emission. By comparison, stronger red light fluorescence was detected when the concentration of PA-1 was enhanced. To our knowledge, PI only penetrates bacteria with irreversibly damaged membranes and emits red fluorescence light. This parameter can provide a rough approximation of nonviable cells. Hence, it presented that membranes of E. coli and S. aureus were destroyed after PA-1 treatment and this was in accordance with the former results.

Measurement of MP

MP, which only keeps in cytoplasmic membranes of bacteria, reflects membrane integrity and energy status as well as viability of cells.26 Prior results demonstrated the destructive effect of PA-1 on bacteria viability and membrane integrity. On the basis of this, we inferred that PA-1 might also affect MP of bacteria. The dye 3, 3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide, which can be bound to the inner side of cytoplasmic membrane bi-layer,27 was used in this study. Changes in the level of MP upon PA-1 treatment were measured by using flow cytometry. Fluorescence intensities of PA-1-treated cells were lower than the untreated controls and were concentration dependent (Figure 4D). Therefore, the decreased MP of cells treated by different concentrations of PA-1 was observed and demonstrated the reduced energy level of bacteria. As we have known, the loss of membrane integrity can result in the collapse of the cell energetics and active transports, and then lead to the death of the cell.28

Effect of lecithin and phosphate on the antibacterial activity of PA-1

As far as we know, the cytoplasmic membranes of E. coli and S. aureus were primarily composed of a bi-layer of phospholipid molecules. Therefore, the phospholipid might notably become the target of PA-1 on the membrane.17 Lecithin was used to simulate phospholipid and test this hypothesis. As shown in Figure 5a, effect of lecithin on the antibacterial activity of PA-1 was measured by the inhibition rate. Results showed that PA-1 when treated with different concentrations of lecithin could still effectively inhibit growth of E. coli when compared with control. In the case of S. aureus, the addition of lecithin had an obvious effect on the inhibition rate. When the mass radio of PA-1 to lecithin was 1:0.2, the inhibition rate value was 75.2% and continued to decrease to 62.7 and 39.3% when the mass ratio varied to 1:1 and 1:5. It meant that lecithin influenced the interaction between PA-1 and S. aureus but it was not the case in E. coli. Therefore, the effect of lecithin on the antibacterial activity of PA-1 was completely different between E. coli and S. aureus. Phospholipid is the target molecule of PA-1 on the membrane of S. aureus but not of E. coli.

Figure 5
figure 5

Effect of lecithin (a) and phosphate groups (b) on the antibacterial activity of pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA-1) against E. coli and S. aureus. Assays were measured by the inhibition rate. The mass ratio of PA-1/lecithin or phosphate groups was 1:0.2, 1:1 and 1:5. Control was performed with lecithin/phosphate group-untreated PA-1.

In addition, phosphate groups are components of nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) and phospholipid membranes, and they also have a key role in bacterial energy metabolism and regulation of acid–base balance. Therefore, phosphate groups were used to evaluate the possible involvement in antibacterial activity of PA-1 against E. coli and S. aureus. Compared with lecithin, similar results of phosphate groups on the antibacterial activity of PA-1 were shown in Figure 5b. For E. coli, PA-1 at tested concentrations with phosphate groups could inhibit bacterial growth normally when compared with the untreated PA-1. On the contrary, the addition of phosphate groups apparently weakened the inhibition rate of PA-1-treated S. aureus. These results suggested that phosphate groups influenced the interaction of PA-1 and S. aureus but not of E. coli.

For all we know, one of the major differences between E. coli and S. aureus is the existence of lipopolysaccharide, which only exists in the outer membrane of E. coli and can impede the penetration of charged and lipophilic compounds.29 Therefore, lipopolysaccharide may prevent PA-1 to bind to phospholipid and phosphate groups of Gram-negative bacteria, which was in accord with the results of E. coli. Although PA-1 did not act on phospholipid and phosphate groups of E. coli, proton motive force, electron flow, nutrient uptake and enzyme activity all might be the target of cell membrane according to Tian et al.30

In this study, antimicrobial activity and action mode of the novel synthesized PA-1 was firstly evaluated. It showed stronger antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria than against Gram-negative bacteria and fungi. The representative E. coil and S. aureus were chosen to investigate antibacterial mechanism. As for E. coli, the antibacterial activity of PA-1 was due to the interactions with cell membranes, and consequently influenced the membrane permeability and energy metabolism. Owing to the structural discrepancies between E. coil and S. aureus, results showed that PA-1 inhibited the growth of S. aureus by acting on phospholipids and phosphate groups of cell membranes and then damaging the cell membranes. However, we believe that the action mode of PA-1 is probably more complex than assumed above. Our future work will be focused on the mechanism of PA-1 to bacteria. Hopefully, PA-1 would be an alternative pro-drug with strong antibacterial activity to present antibiotics in the clinical usage.