Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical nutrition, enteral and parenteral nutrition

Enteral nutrition within 72 h after onset of acute pancreatitis vs delayed initiation

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 68, pages 1288–1293 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objectives:

To explore early (within 72 h) vs delayed enteral nutrition (EN) therapy for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP).

Subjects/methods:

A total of 93 patients were allocated to two groups: early enteral nutrition (EEN) group (started within 72 h after onset) and delayed enteral nutrition (DEN) group (started beyond 72 h but within 7 days after onset). Baseline parameters and scores were recorded on admission and on day 3 after the initiation of EN therapy, as were the clinical outcome variables.

Results:

Hospital mortality, length of stay, number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation and incidence of pancreatic infection in the EEN group were significantly lower than those in the DEN group; all six reported deaths were in the DEN group. In the DEN group, more patients suffered from sepsis, shock or acute kidney injury, and more patients required surgical intervention or continuous renal replacement therapy. On day 3 after EN therapy was initiated, the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores, sequential organ failure assessment scores, C-reactive protein levels and the incidence of bowel wall thickening were lower in the EEN group than in the DEN group. The time when EN therapy was initiated was a prognostic variable for pancreatic infection (odds ratio, 24.08; P=0.014).

Conclusions:

Compared with the DEN therapy, EEN therapy can accelerate the recovery of disturbed homeostasis, reduce the incidence of pancreatic infection and improve the clinical outcomes of AP patients. For AP patients, EN therapy should be initiated within 72 h after onset.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gianotti L, Meier R, Lobo DN, Bassi C, Dejong CH, Ockenga J et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: pancreas. Clin Nutr 2009; 28: 428–435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Petrov MS, Pylypchuk RD, Emeyanov NV . Systematic review: nutritional support in acute pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 28: 704–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Feller JH, Brown RA, Toussaint GP, Thompson AG . Changing methods in the treatment of severe pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1974; 127: 196–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McClave SA, Greene LM, Snider HL, Makk LJ, Cheadle WG, Owens NA et al. Comparison of the safety of early enteral vs parenteral nutrition in mild acute pancreatitis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1997; 21: 14–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mirtallo JM, Forbes A, McClave SA, Jensen GL, Waitzberg DL, Davies AR . International Consensus Guideline Committee Pancreatitis Task Force. International consensus guidelines for nutrition therapy in pancreatitis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2012; 36: 284–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS . American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108 9: 1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Uhl W, Warshaw A, Imrie C, Bassi C, McKay CJ, Lankisch PG et al. IAP Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2002; 2: 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ziegler TR . Parenteral nutrition in the critically ill patient. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1088–1097.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kotani J, Usami M, Nomura H, Iso A, Kasahara H, Kuroda Y et al. Enteral nutrition prevents bacterial translocation but does not improve survival during acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 287–292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Windsor AC, Kanwar S, Li AG, Barnes E, Guthrie JA, Spark JI et al. Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral feeding attenuates the acute phase response and improves disease severity in acute pancreatitis. Gut 1998; 42: 431–435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu XM, Ji KQ, Wang HY, Li GF, Zang B, Chen WM . Total enteral nutrition in prevention of pancreatic necrotic infection in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2010; 39: 248–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Petrov MS, Kukosh MV, Emelyanov NV . A randomized controlled trial of enteral versus parenteral feeding in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis shows a significant reduction in mortality and in infected pancreatic complications with total enteral nutrition. Dig Surg 2006; 23: 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quan H, Wang X, Guo C . A meta-analysis of enteral nutrition and total parenteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2011; 2011: 698248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Petrov MS, Whelan K . Comparison of complications attributable to enteral and parenteral nutrition in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 2010; 103: 1287–1295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Omran M, Albalawi ZH, Tashkandi MF, Al-Ansary LA . Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 1: CD002837.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reintam Blaser A, Malbrain ML, Starkopf J, Fruhwald S, Jakob SM, De Waele J et al. Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM Working Group on Abdominal Problems. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 384–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wereszczynska-Siemiatkowska U, Swidnicka-Siergiejko A, Siemiatkowski A, Dabrowski A . Early enteral nutrition is superior to delayed enteral nutrition for the prevention of infected necrosis and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2013; 42: 640–646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li JY, Yu T, Chen GC, Yuan YH, Zhong W, Zhao LN et al. Enteral nutrition within 48 h of admission improves clinical outcomes of acute pancreatitis by reducing complications: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e64926.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Petrov MS, Pylypchuk RD, Uchugina AF . A systematic review on the timing of artificial nutrition in acute pancreatitis. Br J Nutr 2009; 101: 787–793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ammori BJ, Cairns A, Dixon MF, Larvin M, McMahon MJ . Altered intestinal morphology and immunity in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002; 9: 490–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Q, Wang C, Tang C, He Q, Li N, Li J . Bacteremia in patients with acute pancreatitis as revealed by 16 S ribosomal RNA gene-based techniques. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 1938–1950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Harrison DA, D'Amico G, Singer M . The Pancreatitis Outcome Prediction (POP) Score: a new prognostic index for patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 1703–1708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cordemans C, De Laet I, Van Regenmortel N, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Huber W et al. Fluid management in critically ill patients: the role of extravascular lung water, abdominal hypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance. Ann Intensive Care 2012; 2 (Suppl 1): S1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Macari M, Balthazar EJ . CT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 1105–1116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gloor B, Müller CA, Worni M, Stahel PF, Redaelli C, Uhl W et al. Pancreatic infection in severe pancreatitis: the role of fungus and multiresistant organisms. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 592–596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG et al. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62: 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 580–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Renooij W, de Smet MB, Boermeester MA, Fischer K et al. Intestinal barrier dysfunction in a randomized trial of a specific probiotic composition in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 712–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McClave SA, Heyland DK . The physiologic response and associated clinical benefits from provision of early enteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract 2009; 24: 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McKay CJ, Buter A . Natural history of organ failure in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2003; 3: 111–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. De Campos T, Braga CF, Kuryura L, Hebara D, Assef JC, Rasslan S . Changes in the management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Arq Gastroenterol 2008; 45: 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Leaphart CL, Tepas 3rd JJ . The gut is a motor of organ system dysfunction. Surgery 2007; 141: 563–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reintam A, Parm P, Redlich U, Tooding LM, Starkopf J, Köhler F et al. Gastrointestinal failure in intensive care: a retrospective clinical study in three different intensive care units in Germany and Estonia. BMC Gastroenterol 2006; 6: 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Petrov MS, Windsor JA . Nutritional management of acute pancreatitis: the concept of 'gut rousing'. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2013; 16: 557–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ammori BJ . Role of the gut in the course of severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2003; 26: 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kazantsev GB, Hecht DW, Rao R, Fedorak IJ, Gattuso P, Thompson K et al. Plasmid labeling confirms bacterial translocation in pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1994; 167: 201–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yasuda T, Takeyama Y, Ueda T, Shinzeki M, Sawa H, Nakajima T et al. Breakdown of intestinal mucosa via accelerated apoptosis increases intestinal permeability in experimental severe acute pancreatitis. J Surg Res 2006; 135: 18–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by research foundation of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81170438.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China

    L Zou, L Ke, W Li, Z Tong, C Wu, Y Chen, G Li, N Li & J Li

Authors
  1. L Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L Ke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Z Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Y Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. G Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. N Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on European Journal of Clinical Nutrition website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, L., Ke, L., Li, W. et al. Enteral nutrition within 72 h after onset of acute pancreatitis vs delayed initiation. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 1288–1293 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.164

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.164

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links