Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Developing micronutrient reference values: prioritization of tool development by the EURRECA Network of Excellence

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 64, pages S11–S18 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objectives:

The EURRECA Network of Excellence is developing standardized methods that will guide the alignment of micronutrient reference values (RVs) across Europe. A consultation process to identify and prioritize the best practice, ‘tools’ or guidance for EURRECA was undertaken.

Subjects/Methods:

A questionnaire was sent to 90 individuals with experience of setting or using RVs. Respondents were asked to rank the usefulness of each type of possible guidance.

Results:

In all, 52% of individuals returned completed questionnaires. For the planning process, the most needed guidance was on the best way to assess the ‘status quo’ of RVs; what to cover, setting priorities, how to take into consideration the diverse needs of the users; and making the whole process transparent. The most needed guidance for the active stage of development was how to obtain valid and robust data on intakes and status to use as a base for RVs; how to account for food-related factors; how to incorporate results of systematic reviews; how to identify unbiased and independent reviews and make decisions if evidence is conflicting; methods to ‘weight’ the evidence; and formats or concepts to convert scientific requirements into RVs. Users of RVs required guidance on communication, codes of practice to raise professional and public awareness, making them easy to use in the intended way.

Conclusions:

The questionnaire responses provided views from a wide range of experts on the most needed ‘tools’ and standardized methodologies for the process of reviewing micronutrient RVs. This will help the EURRECA Network of Excellence to prioritize resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton K, Hooper L, Harvey LJ, Hurst R, Casgrain A, Fairweather-Tait SJ (2009). Methods of assessment of selenium status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 2025S–2039S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashwell M, Lambert JP, Alles MS, Branca F, Bucchini L, Brzozowska A et al. (2008). How we will produce the evidence-based EURRECA toolkit to support nutrition and food policy. Eur J Nutr 47 (Suppl 1), 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavelaars AEJM, Kadvan A, Doets EL, Tepšić J, Novaković R, Dhonukshe-Rutten R et al. (2010). Nutri-RecQuest: a web-based search engine on current micronutrient recommendations. Eur J Clin Nutr 64 (Suppl 2), S43–S47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavelaars AEJM, Doets EL, Dhonukshe-Rutten RAM, Hermoso M, Fairweather-Tait SJ, Koletzko B et al. (2010). Prioritizing micronutrients for the purpose of reviewing their requirements: a protocol developed by EURRECA. Eur J Clin Nutr 64(Suppl 2), S19–S30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietitians of Canada (2001). Dietary Reference Values—Learn About These Important Nutrition Reference Values Online. Canadian Dietetic Association: Toronto.

  • Doets EL, de Wit LS, Dhonukshe-Rutten RA, Cavelaars AE, Raats MM, Timotijevic L et al. (2008). Current micronutrient recommendations in Europe: towards understanding their differences and similarities. Eur J Nutr 47 (Suppl 1), 17–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority. Panel on Dietetic Products Nutrition and Allergies (2010). Scientific Opinion on establishing Food-Based Dietary Guidelines. EFSA J 8. Article identifier: 1460.

  • European Food Safety Authority. Panel on Dietetic Products Nutrition and Allergies (2008). Principles for deriving and applying Dietary Reference Values—published for public consultation.

  • European Parliament and Council (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1925/206 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain substances to foods. Official Journal of the European Union OJ L 404, 49, 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council (2007). Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Corrigendum. Official Journal of the European Union L 12 50, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather-Tait SJ, Harvey LJ (2008). Micronutrient status methods: proceedings of the EURRECA workshop and working party on new approaches for measuring micronutrient status. Br J Nutr 99, S1–S80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Global Forum for Health Research (2004). Priority setting in health research. In: Davey S (ed) The 10/90 Report on Health Research 2003–2004. Global Forum for Health Research: Geneva. pp 67–104.

  • Harvey LJ, Ashton K, Hooper L, Casgrain A, Fairweather-Tait SJ (2009). Methods of assessment of copper status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 2009S–2024S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoey L, McNulty H, Strain JJ (2009a). Studies on biomarker responses to intervention with riboflavin: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 1960S–1980S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoey L, Strain JJ, McNulty H (2009b). Studies of biomarker responses to intervention with vitamin B-12: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 1981S–1996S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper L, Ashton K, Harvey LJ, Decsi T, Fairweather-Tait SJ (2009). Assessing potential biomarkers of micronutrient status using systematic review methodology: methods. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 1953S–1959S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (2000). Applications in Dietary Assessment. The National Academies Press: Washington.

  • Institute of Medicine (2003). Guiding Principles Nutrition Labelling and Fortification. The National Academies Press: Washington.

  • Institute of Medicine (2006). Dietary Reference Intakes—The Essential Guide to Nutrient Requirements. The National Academies Press: Washington.

  • King JC, Garza C (2007). International harmonization of approaches for developing nutrient-based dietary standards. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 28 (Suppl), S3–S153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JC, Vorster HH, Tome DG (2007). Nutrient intake values (NIVs): a recommended terminology and framework for the derivation of values. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 28, S16–S26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe NM, Fekete K, Decsi T (2009). Methods of assessment of zinc status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 2040S–2051S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Tricco AC (2008). Issues related to the conduct of systematic reviews: a focus on the nutrition field. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 1191–1199.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Health and Medical Research Council (2006). Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.

  • Ristic-Medic D, Piskackova Z, Hooper L, Ruprich J, Casgrain A, Ashton K et al. (2009). Methods of assessment of iodine status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 2052S–2069S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2008). SIGN 50: A Guideline Developer's. NHS Quality Improvement Scotland: Handbook.

  • Seamans K, Cashman KD (2009). Existing and potentially novel functional markers of vitamin D status: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 1997S–2008S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serra-Majem L, Ngo J, Roman-Vinas B (2009). Micronutrient assessment in Europe: best evidence and practice. The EURRECA Network of Excellence. Br J Nutr 101, S1–S113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffer M, Taylor CL (2007). The Development of DRIs 1994–2004: Lessons Learned and New Challenges. Institute of Medicine: Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CL (2008). Framework for DRI Development, Components ‘Known’ and Components ‘To Be Explored’. Health Canada: Ottowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuraisingam S, Riddell L, Cook K, Lawrence M (2009). The politics of developing reference standards for nutrient intakes: the case of Australia and New Zealand. Public Health Nutr 12, 1531–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timotijevic L, Raats MM, Barnett J, Brown K, Shepherd R, Fernandez L et al. (2010). From micronutrient recommendations to policy: consumer and stakeholder involvement. Eur J Clin Nutr 64 (Suppl 2), S31–S37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research (2007). Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. AICR: Washington DC.

  • World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization (1998). Preparation and use of food-based dietary guidelines. Report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation. In: WHO technical report series No. 880. WHO: Geneva.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank those who helped with the development of the questionnaire and all respondents. The work reported herein has been carried out within the EURRECA Network of Excellence (http://www.eurreca.org), which is financially supported by the Commission of the European Communities, specific Research, Technology and Development (RTD) Programme Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources, within the Sixth Framework Programme, contract no. 036196. This report does not necessarily reflect the Commission's views or its future policy in this area.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lambert Nutrition Consultancy Ltd, Watlington, UK

    J P Lambert

  2. Ashwell Associates (Europe) Ltd, Ashwell, UK

    M Ashwell

Authors
  1. J P Lambert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Ashwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J P Lambert.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

JP Lambert and M Ashwell have declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Contributors: JPL and MA contributed to the design of the questionnaire and analysis of results.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambert, J., Ashwell, M. Developing micronutrient reference values: prioritization of tool development by the EURRECA Network of Excellence. Eur J Clin Nutr 64 (Suppl 2), S11–S18 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.56

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.56

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links