Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Neighbourhood-socioeconomic variation in women's diet: the role of nutrition environments

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 64, pages 1423–1432 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods is associated with increased risk of a poor diet; however, the mechanisms underlying associations are not well understood. This study investigated whether selected healthy and unhealthy dietary behaviours are patterned by neighbourhood-socioeconomic disadvantage, and if so, whether features of the neighbourhood–nutrition environment explain these associations.

Subjects/Methods:

A survey was completed by 1399 women from 45 neighbourhoods of varying levels of socioeconomic disadvantage in Melbourne, Australia. Survey data on fruit, vegetable and fast-food consumption were linked with data on food store locations (supermarket, greengrocer and fast-food store density and proximity) and within-store factors (in-store data on price and availability for supermarkets and greengrocers) obtained through objective audits. Multilevel regression analyses were used to examine associations of neighbourhood disadvantage with fruit, vegetable and fast-food consumption, and to test whether nutrition environment factors mediated these associations.

Results:

After controlling for individual-level demographic and socioeconomic factors, neighbourhood disadvantage was associated with less vegetable consumption and more fast-food consumption, but not with fruit consumption. Some nutrition environmental factors were associated with both neighbourhood disadvantage and with diet. Nutrition environmental features did not mediate neighbourhood-disadvantage variations in vegetable or fast-food consumption.

Conclusions:

Although we found poorer diets among women living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Melbourne, the differences were not attributable to less supportive nutrition environments in these neighbourhoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreyeva T, Blumenthal DM, Schwartz MB, Long MW, Brownell KD (2008). Availability and prices of foods across stores and neighborhoods: the case of New Haven, Connecticut. Health Affairs 27, 1381–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2003). Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA). Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra.

  • Ball K, Crawford D, Mishra G (2006). Socio-economic inequalities in women's fruit and vegetable intakes: a multilevel study of individual, social and environmental mediators. Public Health Nutr 9, 623–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball K, Jeffery RW, Crawford DA, Roberts RJ, Salmon J, Timperio AF (2008). Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments. Prev Med 47, 294–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball K, Timperio A, Crawford D (2009). Neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities in food access and affordability. Health Place 15, 578–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buijsse B, Feskens EJ, Schulze MB, Forouhi NG, Wareham NJ, Sharp S et al (2009). Fruit and vegetable intakes and subsequent changes in body weight in European populations: results from the project on Diet, Obesity, and Genes (DiOGenes). Am J Clin Nutr 90, 202–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V, Warm D (2002). Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires—a review. Public Health Nutr 5, 567–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns S (1995). Travel for food shopping: The Fourth Solution. Traffic Eng Control 36, 411–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerin E, Mackinnon DP (2009). A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity. Public Health Nutr 12, 1182–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockett EG, Clancy KL, Bowering J (1992). Comparing the cost of a Thrifty Food Plan market basket in three areas of New York State. J Nutr Educ 24, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins S, Macintyre S (2002). A systematic study of an urban foodscape: the price and availability of food in Greater Glasgow. Urban Stud 39, 2115–2130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins SC, McKay L, Macintyre S (2005). McDonald's restaurants and neighborhood deprivation in Scotland and England. Am J Prev Med 29, 308–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecob R, Macintyre S (2000). Small area variations in health related behaviours; do these depend on the behaviour itself, its measurement, or on personal characteristics? Health Place 6, 261–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franco M, Diez Roux AV, Glass TA, Caballero B, Brancati FL (2008). Neighborhood characteristics and availability of healthy foods in Baltimore. Am J Prev Med 35, 561–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giskes K, Turrell G, van Lenthe FJ, Brug J, Mackenbach JP (2006). A multilevel study of socio-economic inequalities in food choice behaviour and dietary intake among the Dutch population: the GLOBE study. Public Health Nutr 9, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giskes K, Van Lenthe FJ, Brug J, Mackenbach JP, Turrell G (2007). Socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing: the contribution of respondent-perceived and actual (objectively measured) price and availability of foods. Prev Med 45, 41–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glanz K, Basil M, Maibach E, Goldberg J, Snyder D (1998). Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 1118–1126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glanz K, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD (2005). Healthy nutrition environments: concepts and measures. Am J Health Promot 19, 330–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie JF, Lin BH, Frazao E (2002). Role of food prepared away from home in the American diet, 1977–78 versus 1994–96: changes and consequences. J Nutr Educ Behav 34, 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham J, Moffat T (2007). Determinants of variation in food cost and availability in two socioeconomically contrasting neighbourhoods of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Health Place 13, 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magarey A, McKean S, Daniels L (2006). Evaluation of fruit and vegetable intakes of Australian adults: the National Nutrition Survey 1995. Aust NZ J Public Health 30, 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore LV, Diez Roux AV, Nettleton JA, Jacobs Jr DR (2008). Associations of the local food environment with diet quality—a comparison of assessments based on surveys and geographic information systems: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 167, 917–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness AR, Powles JW (1997). Fruit and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: a review. Int J Epidemiol 26, 1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J, Blakely T, Witten K, Bartie P (2007). Neighborhood deprivation and access to fast-food retailing: a national study. Am J Prev Med 32, 375–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J, Day P, Witten K (2008). Neighbourhood provision of food and alcohol retailing and social deprivation in urban New Zealand. Urban Pol Res 26, 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira MA, Kartashov AI, Ebbeling CB, Van Horn L, Slattery ML, Jacobs Jr DR et al (2005). Fast-food habits, weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective analysis. Lancet 365, 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell LM, Zhao Z, Wang Y (2009). Food prices and fruit and vegetable consumption among young American adults. Health Place 15, 1064–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos E, Talala K, Laaksonen M, Helakorpi S, Rahkonen O, Uutela A et al (2008). Trends of socioeconomic differences in daily vegetable consumption, 1979–2002. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 823–833.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shohaimi S, Welch A, Bingham S, Luben R, Day N, Wareham N et al (2004). Residential area deprivation predicts fruit and vegetable consumption independently of individual educational level and occupational social class: a cross sectional population study in the Norfolk cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC-Norfolk). J Epidemiol Commun Health 58, 686–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooman A, Macintyre S, Anderson A (1993). Scotland's health—a more difficult challenge for some? The price and availability of healthy foods in socially contrasting localities in the west of Scotland. Health Bull (Edinb) 51, 276–284.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subar AF, Heimendinger J, Patterson BH, Krebs-Smith SM, Pivonka E, Kessler R (1995). Fruit and vegetable intake in the United States: the baseline survey of the Five A Day for Better Health Program. Am J Health Promot 9, 352–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamers SL, Agurs-Collins T, Dodd KW, Nebeling L (2009). US and France adult fruit and vegetable consumption patterns: an international comparison. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 11–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton LE, Bentley RJ, Kavanagh AM (2009). Fast food purchasing and access to fast food restaurants: a multilevel analysis of VicLANES. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ 6, 28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turrell G, Giskes K (2008). Socioeconomic disadvantage and the purchase of takeaway food: a multilevel analysis. Appetite 51, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turrell G, Bentley R, Thomas LR, Jolley D, Subramanian S, Kavanagh AM (2009). A multilevel study of area socio-economic status and food purchasing behaviour. Public Health Nutr 12, 2074–2083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler E, Turrell G, Patterson C (2006). Does living in a disadvantaged area entail limited opportunities to purchase fresh fruit and vegetables in terms of price, availability, and variety? Findings from the Brisbane Food Study. Health Place 12, 741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xyris Software FoodWorks Professional. Xyris Software: Brisbane, 2007.

  • Zenk SN, Lachance LL, Schulz AJ, Mentz G, Kannan S, Ridella W (2009). Neighborhood retail food environment and fruit and vegetable intake in a multiethnic urban population. Am J Health Promot 23, 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Rebecca Roberts for assistance with geospatial analyses and Nick Andrianopoulos for advice on the statistical approach. This study was funded by the Australian Research Council (DP0665242) and the National Heart Foundation of Australia (G02M 0658). LT is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Capacity Building Grant, ID 425845; KB is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship, ID 479513; and D is supported by a VicHealth Research Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia

    L E Thornton, D A Crawford & K Ball

Authors
  1. L E Thornton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D A Crawford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K Ball
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L E Thornton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thornton, L., Crawford, D. & Ball, K. Neighbourhood-socioeconomic variation in women's diet: the role of nutrition environments. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 1423–1432 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.174

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.174

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links