Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Analysis of the health economic impact of medical nutrition in the Netherlands

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 64, pages 1229–1234 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

A health economic analysis was performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of oral nutritional supplements (ONS), being a medical nutrition product, in the Netherlands.

Methods:

This analysis is based on a comparison of the use of ONS versus ‘no use’ of ONS in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The costs and benefits of the two treatment strategies were assessed using a linear decision analytical model reflecting treatment patterns and outcomes in abdominal surgery. The incremental cost difference was based on costs associated with ONS and hospitalization. Clinical probabilities and resource utilization were based on clinical trials and published literature; cost data were derived from official price tariffs.

Results:

The use of ONS reduces the costs with a € 252 (7.6%) cost saving per patient. The hospitalization costs reduce from € 3,318 to € 3,044 per patient, which is a 8.3% cost saving and corresponds with 0.72 days reduction in length of stay. The use of ONS would lead to an annual cost saving of a minimum of € 40.4 million per year. Sensitivity analyses showed that the use of ONS remains cost saving compared with ‘no use’ of ONS. A threshold analysis on the length of stay shows that at 0.64 days, the use of ONS is still cost-effective, which is an unrealistic value.

Conclusions:

This analysis shows that the use of medical nutrition, ONS in this case, is a cost-effective treatment in the Netherlands and is dominant over standard care without medical nutrition: it leads to cost savings and a higher effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASPEN (2002). Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 26 (Suppl), 1SA–138SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia M, Stratton R, Russel C, Green C, Pang F (2005a). The cost of disease related malnutrition in the UK and economic considerations for the use of oral nutritional supplements in adults. Health Economic Report on Malnutrition in the UK. BAPEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia M, Zellipour L, Stratton RJ (2005b). To screen or not to screen for adult malnutrition? Clin Nutr 24, 867–884.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FSSPEN French Speaking Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition (1996). Perioperative artificial nutrition in elective adult surgery. Clin Nutr 15, 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gariballa S, Forster S, Walters S, Powers H (2006). A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of nutritional supplementation during acute illness. Am J Med 119, 693–699.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halfens RJG, Janssen MAP, Meijers JMM (2006). Ondervoeding. In: Rapportage resultaten Landelijke prevalentiemeting zorgproblemen 2006 Universiteit Maastricht Zorgwetenschappen sectie Verplegingswetenschap Universitaire pers Maastricht: Maastricht, pp 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfens RJG, Meijers JMM, Neyens JCL, Offermans MPJ (2007). Ondervoeding. In: Rapportage resultaten. Landelijke prevalentiemeting zorgproblemen 2007, Universiteit Maastricht Onderzoeksinstituut Caphri, Department of Health Care and Nursing Sciences Universitaire pers Maastricht: Maastrichtm, pp 81–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruizenga HM, Wierdsma NJ, van Bokhorst -de van der Schueren MAE, Hollander HJ, Jonkers-Schuitema CF, van der Heijden E et al. (2003). Screening of nutritional status in The Netherlands. Clin Nutr 22, 147–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maessen J, Dejong CHD, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J et al. (2007). A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94, 224–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martyn CN, Winter PD, Coles SJ, Edington J (1998). Effect of nutritional status on use of health care resources by patients with chronic disease living in the community. Clin Nutr 17, 119–123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClave SA, Snider HL, Spain DA (1999). Preoperative issues in clinical nutrition. CHEST 115, 64S–70S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naber TH, Schermer T, de Bree A, Nusteling K, Eggink L, Kruimel JW et al. (1997). Prevalence of malnutrition in nonsurgical hospitalized patients and its association with disease complications. Am J Clin Nutr 66, 1232–1239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nuijten MJ (1998). The selection of data sources for use in modelling studies. Pharmacoeconomics 13, 305–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oostenbrink JB, Bouwmans CAM, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH (2004). Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek, Geactualiseerde versie 2004 CVZ: Diemen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter JM (2001). Oral supplements in the elderly. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 4, 21–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prismant (2003). Data on number of hospitalisations and length of stay.

  • Stratton RJ (2005). Elucidating effective ways to identify and treat malnutrition. Proc Nutr Soc 64, 305–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratton RJ, Elia M (2007). Who benefits from nutritional support: what is the evidence? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19, 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratton RJ, Ek AC, Engfer M, Moore Z, Rigby P, Wolfe R et al. (2005). Enteral nutritional support in prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 4, 422–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratton RJ, Green CJ, Elia M (2003). Disease-related malnutrition: an evidence-based approach to treatment. CABI Publishing: Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan SS, Koopmanschap M (2007). The cost of disease related malnutrition and the cost-effectiveness of nutrition interventions: a feasibility study for the Netherlands. Data on file.

  • Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV (1980). Clinical decision analysis. WB Saunders Co: Philadelphia, Pa, pp 228–265.

  • Richtlijn Perioperatief voedingsbeleid (2007). Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, http://www.cbo.nl.

  • http://www.cbs.nlnl-NL/menu/cijfers/default.htm.

  • ACHTERGRONDINFORMATIE (2008). Implementatie van vroege herkenning & behandeling van ondervoeding in de kliniek en op de polikliniek in Nederlandse ziekenhuizen. www.snellerbeter.nl/fileadmin/snellerbeter/documenten/Ondervoeding/19projectplan_maasziekenhuispantein.doc, http://www.snellerbeter.nl (accessed 12 May 2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Department, Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition, on behalf of the Dutch Industry of Children and Dietary Nutrition (VNFKD), Zoetermeer, The Netherlands

    K Freijer

  2. Ars Accessus Medica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    M J C Nuijten

  3. Erasmus University,, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    M J C Nuijten

Authors
  1. K Freijer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M J C Nuijten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Freijer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The publication of the study results was not contingent on the sponsor's approval; this research was funded by the Dutch Industry of Children and Dietary Nutrition (VNFKD) and Dr Mark Nuijten has served as a consultant and was paid to conduct the analyses presented in this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freijer, K., Nuijten, M. Analysis of the health economic impact of medical nutrition in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 1229–1234 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.147

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.147

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links