Sir,
We read with great interest the article ‘KRAS-mutated plasma DNA as predictor of outcome from irinotecan monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer’ published by (Spindler et al, 2013) in the December 2013 issue of the British Journal of Cancer. It is now well established that only patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer benefit from treatment with an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody and that patients with KRAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer do not (Karapetis et al, 2008; Douillard et al, 2010). Up until now, DNA from archival tumour tissue is used to determine KRAS mutations in clinical practice. Increased recent data indicate that circulating tumour DNA in plasma, could be a new way to analyse the somatic mutation in tumours and could be a potential biomarker to ensure optimal treatment (Murtaza et al, 2013). Spindler et al (2013) aimed to investigate the clinical implication of KRAS and BRAF mutations in both archival tumour tissue and plasma cell-free DNA in 211 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with second-line irinotecan monotherapy. Authors observed that plasma KRAS mutations, but not tumour KRAS mutations, were associated with worse disease control rate, progression-free survival and overall survival. However, contrary to what is mentioned in the title, the predictive impact of the plasma KRAS and BRAF mutations for the irinotecan response treatment cannot be evaluated in this study because there is no control arm (patients receiving other therapies or no therapy).
In this study, KRAS mutations have been detected less frequently in plasma (31%) as compared in tumour (45%) (16 patients with a wild-type KRAS plasma had a mutation in the tumour). Tumour KRAS mutations were analysed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue obtained at diagnosis, whereas plasma KRAS mutations were analysed in pretreatment blood samples before the beginning of second-line irinotecan monotherapy. The description of patients receiving an anti-EGFR in first-line therapy would be an interesting information, as acquired KRAS mutations can be induced by these therapies (Misale et al, 2012). The presence of a minority subclone harbouring KRAS mutations within tumours might explain the secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapy (Tougeron et al, 2013) and the emergence of plasma KRAS mutations (Diaz et al, 2012).
Furthermore, the discordance for the KRAS mutation detection rate between tumour and plasma could be explained by a lack of sensitivity for the plasma KRAS mutations detection or by the absence of circulating tumour DNA for some patients. The amplification refractory mutation system-quantitative PCR (ARMS-qPCR) methodology, used in this study, has a sensitivity around 0.1% (Fox et al, 1998; Nordgård et al, 2012). Some studies have suggested that ARMS has an insufficient sensitivity to detect low levels of KRAS mutation (Nordgård et al, 2012). Indeed, the level of circulating tumour DNA in plasma can be very low and may represent only a small fraction of the total circulating DNA (<0.01%) (Diehl et al, 2008; Taly et al, 2013). Techniques with very high sensitivity for circulating tumour DNA detection have been recently developed (Taly et al, 2012), such as microdroplet technology, which can detect one mutant KRAS gene among 200 000 wild-type KRAS genes in the plasma (Pekin et al, 2011). Thus, we think that the results of the study by Spindler et al (2013) should be interpreted with caution because the poor prognosis of patients with plasma KRAS mutation could only reflect the poor prognosis of patients with a high level of circulating tumour DNA, as suggested by some others studies (Lefebure et al, 2010; Spindler et al, 2012). In contrast, the better prognosis could only reflect the low level of circulating tumour DNA that is not detectable by the ARMS assay for the KRAS mutation testing.
In conclusion, this promising work published by Spindler et al (2013) highlights the impact of circulating tumour DNA on the treatment response of metastatic colorectal cancer. Moreover, it strengthens the need for harmonising detection methods for KRAS mutations and to develop highly sensitive techniques for plasma testing. Thus, correlation of KRAS mutation in primary tumours, metastases and plasma during metastatic colorectal therapies still needs to be studied.
References
Diaz Jr LA, Williams RT, Wu J, Kinde I, Hecht JR, Berlin J, Allen B, Bozic I, Reiter JG, Nowak MA, Kinzler KW, Oliner KS, Vogelstein B (2012) The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers. Nature 486: 537–540.
Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, Li M, Thornton K, Agrawal N, Sokoll L, Szabo SA, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Diaz LA Jr (2008) Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med 14: 985–990.
Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, Humblet Y, Bodoky G, Cunningham D, Jassem J, Rivera F, Kocákova I, Ruff P, Błasińska-Morawiec M, Šmakal M, Canon JL, Rother M, Oliner KS, Wolf M, Gansert J (2010) Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol 28: 4697–4705.
Fox JC, England J, White P, Ellison G, Callaghan K, Charlesworth NR, Hehir J, McCarthy TL, Smith-Ravin J, Talbot IC, Snary D, Northover JM, Newton CR, Little S (1998) The detection of K-ras mutations in colorectal cancer using the amplification-refractory mutation system. Br J Cancer 77: 1267–1274.
Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ, Shepherd L, Au HJ, Langer C, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359: 1757–1765.
Lefebure B, Charbonnier F, Di Fiore F, Tuech JJ, Le Pessot F, Michot F, Michel P, Frebourg T (2010) Prognostic value of circulating mutant DNA in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 251: 275–280.
Misale S, Yaeger R, Hobor S, Scala E, Janakiraman M, Liska D, Valtorta E, Schiavo R, Buscarino M, Siravegna G, Bencardino K, Cercek A, Chen CT, Veronese S, Zanon C, Sartore-Bianchi A, Gambacorta M, Gallicchio M, Vakiani E, Boscaro V, Medico E, Weiser M, Siena S, Di Nicolantonio F, Solit D, Bardelli A (2012) Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Nature 486: 532–536.
Murtaza M, Dawson SJ, Tsui DW, Gale D, Forshew T, Piskorz AM, Parkinson C, Chin SF, Kingsbury Z, Wong AS, Marass F, Humphray S, Hadfield J, Bentley D, Chin TM, Brenton JD, Caldas C, Rosenfeld N (2013) Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA. Nature 497: 108–112.
Nordgård O, Oltedal S, Janssen EA, Gilje B, Kørner H, Tjensvoll K, Smaaland R (2012) Comparison of a PNA clamp PCR and an ARMS/Scorpion PCR assay for the detection of K-ras mutations. Diagn Mol Pathol 21: 9–13.
Pekin D, Skhiri Y, Baret JC, Le Corre D, Mazutis L, Salem CB, Millot F, El Harrak A, Hutchison JB, Larson JW, Link DR, Laurent-Puig P, Griffiths AD, Taly V (2011) Quantitative and sensitive detection of rare mutations using droplet-based microfluidics. Lab Chip 11: 2156–2166.
Spindler KG, Appelt AL, Pallisgaard N, Andersen RF, Jakobsen A (2013) KRAS-mutated plasma DNA as predictor of outcome from irinotecan monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 109: 3067–3072.
Spindler KL, Pallisgaard N, Vogelius I, Jakobsen A (2012) Quantitative cell-free DNA, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in plasma from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during treatment with cetuximab and irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res 18: 1177–1185.
Taly V, Pekin D, Abed AE, Laurent-Puig P (2012) Detecting biomarkers with microdroplet technology. Trends Mol Med 18: 405–416.
Taly V, Pekin D, Benhaim L, Kotsopoulos SK, Le Corre D, Li X, Atochin I, Link DR, Griffiths AD, Pallier K, Blons H, Bouché O, Landi B, Hutchison JB, Laurent-Puig P (2013) Multiplex Picodroplet Digital PCR to Detect KRAS Mutations in Circulating DNA from the Plasma of Colorectal Cancer Patients. Clin Chem 59: 1722–1731.
Tougeron D, Lecomte T, Pages JC, Villalva C, Collin C, Ferru A, Tourani JM, Silvain C, Levillain P, Karayan-Tapon L (2013) Effect of low-frequency KRAS mutations on response to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 24: 1267–1273.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Tougeron, D., Laurent-Puig, P. & Zaanan, A. Comment on ‘KRAS-mutated plasma DNA as predictor of outcome from irinotecan monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer’. Br J Cancer 111, 2379–2380 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.114
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.114