This page has been archived and is no longer updated

 
April 10, 2011 | By:  Khalil A. Cassimally
Aa Aa Aa

Take A Stance Against Medical Research Cutbacks In Australia

News broke out last week that the Australian government is planning major cutbacks in the medical research sector. Cuts of AU$ 400 million over the next three years are expected from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia's premier funding body for medical research. Putting this figure in perspective, AU$ 400m accounts for more than a 50% cut in funding.

The gravity of the situation cannot be understated. It is a disaster being orchestrated by policy-takers who are either too ignorant or delusional. News of the impending cuts confirmed many scientists' worst dreams and portrays Australia as being as naïve as the UK with regards to healthcare for their own people.

Why should medical research be protected? The reasons are endless which makes even thinking about cuts even more mystifying and outrageous.

Medical research saves lives. Every time you go to the doctor's, you are being treated with the fruits of decades (and centuries) of research. The current average global life expectancy is approximately 67 years of age. This compares to 30-45 years of age in early 20th century. Such a boom is attributed mainly to the rewards of modern medicine.

Medical research in Australia is focused on the nation's greatest health problems: cancer, diabetes, heart diseases and obesity. Reducing funding will thus decrease the capacity to respond to unique healthcare needs of Australians.

But medical research is a long-term investment. Work that started ten years ago will yield improvements in healthcare very soon. But if you cancel support near the finale, you've basically blowing off those impending improvements-and you are bidding adieu to all those people who would have been cured.

Science, though, is a global initiative: a breakthrough in Australia can result in lives being saved around the world. Magdeline Lum, over at Philosophically Disturbed, does a great job showing the global importance of Australian medical research. Sir Howard Florey, an Australian, developed penicillin as a medicine, a breakthrough that will go on to save more than 200 million lives. More recently, professors Barry Marshall and Robin Warren determined that stomach ulcers and stomach cancer were more often than not caused by the bacterium, Helicobacter pylori. Antibiotics can effectively kill H.pylori.

Without funding, these breakthroughs would not have been made and people would have died as a result. If funding is cut now, people who can be saved will not be saved. Those people may include me, you, our families, our friends... anyone. Cutting medical research is like handing multiple death sentences.

If the government does not realize that it is spilling blood on its hands, we have to make sure that it does. We need to send them a message that cutting medical research funds is not an option nor will it ever be.

People around Australia will be rallying for research this Tuesday, 12 April. If you care about saving lives, come along and bring your colleagues, friends and family. If you can't make it, join the Twitter rally on the same day or get involved by contacting politicians who influence federal budget decisions or your local federal member.

Medical research is literally a matter of life or death. And discoveries need dollars.

For more information visit the Discoveries Need Dollars' website, twitter or facebook page.

Image credits: Discoveries Need Dollars (pdf)


2 Comments
Comments
April 22, 2011 | 11:20 PM
Posted By:  Douglas Leith
More funds for predictive science, less for animals exp…”The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades, and it simply didn't work in humans. Dr Richard Klausner, Director, National Cancer Institute, LA Times6/5/98We have learned well how to treat cancer in mice and rats but we still can't cure people. Professor Colin Garner, quoted in Accelerator MS Is a Powerful New Tool, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, Vol. 27, No. 15. 2006 We do trials in people because animal models do not predict what will happen in humans. Dr Sally Burtles, Cancer Research UK, Report of the Expert Scientific Group on phase one clinical trials, following the TGN1412 clinical trial disaster. You really have to design the medicine for the species of interest. You’ll find it very rare to find a medicine that will work in both.' Patrick M. O’Connor, head of oncology research for Pfizer, NYTimes
www.curedisease.net
April 11, 2011 | 11:10 AM
Posted By:  Laura Wheeler
Hi this seems this is a popular blogging topic across NPG, why not read MuKa's blog post on Nature Network- "Rally For Research!":http://blogs.nature.com/usandmymind/2011/04/10/rally-for-research I am pleased to hear that there is lots of attention drawn to these drastic cuts on the blogosphere!! Fingers crossed for some effective action!
Blogger Profiles
Recent Posts

« Prev Next »

Connect
Connect Send a message

Scitable by Nature Education Nature Education Home Learn More About Faculty Page Students Page Feedback



Blogs