Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Year in Review
  • Published:

Gout in 2010

Progress and controversies in treatment

Subjects

Important advances have been made in gout therapeutics in 2010. In addition to the development of novel biologic agents, progress has been made in the safe prescribing of colchicine. However, colchicine also became the subject of considerable controversy in the USA when one brand of this drug was granted exclusivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Ahern, M. J. et al. Does colchicine work? The results of the first controlled study in acute gout. Aust. N. Z. J. Med. 17, 301–304 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Terkeltaub, R. A. et al. High versus low dosing of oral colchicine for early acute gout flare: Twenty-four-hour outcome of the first multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-comparison colchicine study. Arthritis Rheum. 62, 1060–1068 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, W. et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann. Rheum. Dis. 65, 1312–1324 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kesselheim, A. S. & Solomon, D. H. Incentives for drug development—the curious case of colchicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 2045–2047 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinon, F., Pétrilli, V., Mayor, A., Tardivel, A. & Tschopp, J. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature 440, 237–241 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. So, A. et al. Canakinumab for the treatment of acute flares in difficult-to-treat gouty arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 62, 3064–3076 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves new drug for gout [online], (2010).

  8. Sundy, J. S. et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous PEGylated recombinant mammalian urate oxidase in patients with refractory gout. Arthritis Rheum. 56, 1021–1028 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hershfield, M. S. et al. Treating gout with pegloticase, a PEGylated urate oxidase, provides insight into the importance of uric acid as an antioxidant in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14351–14356 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

N. Dalbeth has acted as a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Novartis, Roche and Takeda, has received speakers' honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, has received grant/research support from Centecor and Fonterra, and is a patent holder/applicant with Fonterra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalbeth, N. Progress and controversies in treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol 7, 77–78 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.222

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.222

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing