Abstract
For decades, diagnostic imaging in rheumatology has used conventional radiography. Over the past 10 years, MRI and ultrasonography have clearly shown their potential in diagnostic imaging in rheumatology and their use is revolutionizing the management of chronic arthritis, revealing subclinical inflammation and predicting progression of joint damage. Although validation processes for these imaging modalities are still ongoing, several investigations have now established the positive correlation between subclinical synovitis and radiographic progression of joint damage. Despite the available evidence and the diagnostic potential, there remains a substantial proportion of rheumatologists for whom MRI and ultrasonography findings do not influence their clinical decision-making. This Perspectives will discuss the key issues related to diagnostic imaging in patients with chronic arthritis, outlining how new imaging techniques have evolved over the past two decades and presenting the most attractive technological advances in this field.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Tins, B. J. & Butler, R. Imaging in rheumatology: reconciling radiology and rheumatology. Insights Imaging 4, 799–810 (2013).
Østergaard, M. Can imaging be used for inflammatory arthritis screening? Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 16, 401–409 (2012).
McQueen, F. M. Imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 27, 499–522 (2013).
Døhn, U. M. et al. Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis Res. Ther. 8, R110 (2006).
Sharp, J. T., Lidsky, M. D., Collins, L. C. & Moreland, J. Methods of scoring the progression of radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Correlation of radiologic, clinical and laboratory abnormalities. Arthritis Rheum. 14, 706–720 (1971).
Arnett, F. C. et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 31, 315–324 (1988).
Grassi, W., Tittarelli, E., Pirani, O., Avaltroni, D. & Cervini C. Ultrasound examination of metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 22, 243–247 (1993).
Wakefield, R. J. et al. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum. 43, 2762–2770 (2000).
Brown, D. G. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory arthritis of the knee. Clin. Rheumatol. 9, 73–83 (1990).
van Holsbeeck, M. et al. Staging and follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis of the knee. Comparison of sonography, thermography, and clinical assessment. J. Ultrasound Med. 7, 561–566 (1988).
Hoving, J. L. et al. A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, sonography, and radiography of the hand in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 31, 663–675 (2004).
Szkudlarek, M. et al. Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination. Arthritis Res. Ther. 8, R52 (2006).
Ostergaard, M. et al. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies: core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. J. Rheumatol. 30, 1385–1386 (2003).
Wakefield, R. J. et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J. Rheumatol. 32, 2485–2487 (2005).
Ranganath, V. K. et al. The utility of magnetic resonance imaging for assessing structural damage in randomized controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 65, 2513–2523 (2013).
Hammer, H. B. & Kvien, T. K. Comparisons of 7- to 78-joint ultrasonography scores: all different joint combinations show equal response to adalimumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 13, R78 (2011).
Grassi, W., Gaywood, I., Pande, I. & Filippucci E. From DAS 28 to SAS 1. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 30, 649–651 (2012).
Filippucci, E. et al. Hand tendon involvement in rheumatoid arthritis: an ultrasound study. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 41, 752–760 (2012).
Naredo, E. et al. Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 72, 1328–1334 (2013).
Di Geso, L. et al. CS injection of tenosynovitis in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis: the role of US. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51, 1299–1303 (2012).
Filippucci, E. et al. Interobserver reliability of ultrasonography in the assessment of cartilage damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 69, 1845–1848 (2010).
Gutierrez, M. et al. Development of a preliminary US power Doppler composite score for monitoring treatment in PsA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51, 1261–1268 (2012).
Scheel, A. K. et al. Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 65, 595–600 (2006).
Kellgren, J. H., Jeffrey, M. R. & Ball, J. (eds). The Epidemiology of Chronic Rheumatism Vol. 1, 326 (Blackwell Publishing, 1963).
Rudwaleit, M. et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68, 1520–1527 (2009).
Haugen, I. K. & Bøyesen, P. Imaging modalities in hand osteoarthritisand perspectives of conventional radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography. Arthritis Res. Ther. 13, 248 (2011).
Yusuf, E., Kortekaas, M. C., Watt, I., Huizinga, T. W. & Kloppenburg, M. Do knee abnormalities visualised on MRI explain knee pain in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 70, 60–67 (2011).
Guermazi, A., Hayashi, D., Roemer, F. W. & Felson, D. T. Osteoarthritis: a review of strengths and weaknesses of different imaging options. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North. Am. 39, 567–591 (2013).
Hunter, D. J. et al. The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Ann. Rheum. Dis. 67, 206–211 (2008).
Torp-Paedersen, S., Bartels, E. M., Wilhjelm, J. & Bliddal, H. Articular cartilage thickness measured with US is not as easy as it appears: a systematic review of measurement techniques and image interpretation. Ultraschall. Med. 32, 54–61 (2011).
Mathiessen, A. et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of osteophytes in 127 patients with hand osteoarthritis: exploring reliability and associations with MRI, radiographs and clinical joint findings. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 72, 51–56 (2013).
Berkoff, D. J., Miller, L. E. & Block, J. E. Clinical utility of ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee injections: a review. Clin. Interv. Aging 7, 89–95 (2012).
Filippucci, E., Di Geso, L., Girolimetti, R. & Grassi, W. Ultrasound in crystal-related arthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 32, 42–47 (2014).
Brown, A. K. et al. Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. Arthritis Rheum. 54, 3761–3773 (2006).
McQueen, F. M. et al. Bone oedema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 48, 1814–1827 (2003).
Brown, A. K. et al. An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 58, 2958–2967 (2008).
Funck-Brentano, T. et al. Prediction of radiographic damage in early arthritis by sonographic erosions and power Doppler signal: a longitudinal observational study. Arthritis Care Res. 65, 896–902 (2013).
Balint, P. V., Kane, D., Wilson, H., McInnes, I. B. & Sturrock, R. D. Ultrasonography of entheseal insertions in the lower limb in spondyloarthropathy. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 61, 905–910 (2002).
Wakefield, R. et al. Should oligoarthritis be reclassified? Ultrasound reveals a high prevalence of subclinical disease. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 63, 382–385 (2004).
Maksymowych, W. P. Progress in spondylarthritis. Spondyloarthritis: lessons from imaging. Arthritis. Res. Ther. 11, 222 (2009).
Baraliakos, X. & Braun, J. Opinion: Perspectives on imaging in axial spondyloarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 9, 498–502 (2013).
Sturrock, R. D. Clinical utility of ultrasonography in spondyloarthropathies. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 11, 317–320 (2009).
Klauser, A. S. et al. Feasibility of second-generation ultrasound contrast media in the detection of active sacroiliitis. Arthritis Rheum. 15, 909–916 (2009).
Taggart, A. et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound training in rheumatology: the Belfast experience. Rheumatology. 45, 102–105 (2006).
Filippucci, E. et al. E-learning in ultrasonography: a web-based approach. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 66, 962–965 (2007).
Pineda, C. et al. Ultrasound in rheumatology. The Mexican experience. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 26, 929–932 (2008).
Naredo, E. et al. Recommendations for the content and conduct of European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) musculoskeletal ultrasound courses. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 67, 1017–1022 (2008).
Kissin, E. Y. et al. Self-directed learning of basic musculoskeletal ultrasound among rheumatologists in the United States. Arthritis Care Res. 62, 155–160 (2010).
Terslev, L. et al. EFSUMB minimum training requirements for rheumatologists performing musculoskeletal ultrasound. Ultraschall. Med. 34, 475–477 (2013).
Narváez, J., Narváez, J. A., de Albert, M., Gómez-Vaquero, C. & Nolla, J. M. Can magnetic resonance imaging of the hand and wrist differentiate between rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis in the early stages of the disease? Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 42, 234–245 (2012).
Gutierrez, M., Filippucci, E., Salaffi, F., Di Geso, L. & Grassi, W. Differential diagnosis between rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: the value of ultrasound findings at metacarpophalangeal joints level. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 70, 1111–1114 (2011).
Filippucci, E. et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist. XIII. New trends. Three-dimensional ultrasonography. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 26, 1–4 (2008).
Di Geso, L. et al. Comparison between conventional and automated software-guided ultrasound assessment of bilateral common carotids intima-media thickness in patients with rheumatic diseases. Clin. Rheumatol. 31, 881–884 (2012).
Di Geso, L. et al. Reliability of ultrasound measurements of dermal thickness at digits in systemic sclerosis: role of elastosonography. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 29, 926–932 (2011).
Sconfienza, L. M., Silvestri, E., Bartolini, B., Garlaschi, G. & Cimmino, M. A. Sonoelastography may help in the differential diagnosis between rheumatoid nodules and tophi. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 28, 144–145 (2010).
Colebatch, A. N. et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 72, 804–814 (2013).
Filippucci, E. et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist. XX. Sonographic assessment of hand and wrist joint involvement in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 27, 197–200 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors made equal contributions to all aspects of this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
E.F. has given expert testimony for General Electric Medical System and has received speaking fees from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Esaote Spa, General Electric Medical System, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Schering Plough and UCB Pharma. L.D.G. has received speaking fees from Esaote Spa. W.G. has attended advisory board meetings, scientific consultancies and has received speaking fees from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Esaote Spa, Fidia Pharma, General Electric Medical System, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Savient, Schering Plough, UCB Pharma and Wyeth.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filippucci, E., Di Geso, L. & Grassi, W. Progress in imaging in rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol 10, 628–634 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.145
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.145
This article is cited by
-
Von der konventionellen Bildgebung zum Cutting Edge Imaging in der Rheumatologie
Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie (2023)
-
Comprehensive assessment of knee joint synovitis at 7 T MRI using contrast-enhanced and non-enhanced sequences
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2020)
-
Should ultrasound be used routinely in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis?
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) (2020)
-
Ultrasound imaging in rheumatoid arthritis
La radiologia medica (2019)
-
Clinical, Ultrasound, and Predictability Outcomes Following Certolizumab Pegol Treatment (with Methotrexate) in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: 52-Week Results from the CZP-SPEED Study
Advances in Therapy (2018)