Nature | News

Buckyballs in space solve 100-year-old riddle

Spheres of carbon-60 responsible for mysterious cosmic-light features.


Article tools

Rights & Permissions

James Hedberg/(CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

A buckyball is a cage of 60 carbon atoms.

Carbon cages floating in the space between the stars have been confirmed as the cause of cosmic-light features that have puzzled astronomers for almost 100 years.

In 1919, Mary Lea Heger, a graduate student at the University of California’s Lick Observatory on Mount Hamilton, saw that particular wavelengths of light were dimmed in the emissions from certain stars, in a way that seemed unrelated to the stars themselves. As astronomers spotted more such features, they attributed them to molecules in the interstellar gas that absorb wavelengths of light on their way to Earth, and called them diffuse interstellar bands (DIB). Some 400 DIBs have now been observed, from across the Milky Way and beyond.

Dust grains, carbon chains and even floating bacteria emerged as candidates to explain these features, but none proved conclusive. Now, a laboratory analysis of the light absorbed by buckyballs — hollow, soccer-ball shaped molecules made up of 60 carbon atoms — under space-like conditions has provided direct match for DIBs seen in 19941. They are the first DIBs to be explained.

Nature Podcast

Elizabeth Gibney asks John Maier about buckyballs in space.

You may need a more recent browser or to install the latest version of the Adobe Flash Plugin.

The finding, published in Nature on 15 July2, opens the door to identifying other molecules floating in interstellar space. “As far as I'm concerned this is the scientific paper of the year,” says Harry Kroto, the British chemist who shared the 1996 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the discovery of buckminsterfullerene with colleagues Robert Curl and Richard Smalley.

Buckyballs in space

Ever since buckyballs were accidentally discovered in 19853 during experiments designed to simulate conditions in gas flowing out of ageing, carbon-rich stars, scientists have hoped to find them in space, says John Maier, a chemist at the University of Basel in Switzerland and an author of the latest report.

It was not until 2010 that NASA’s Spitzer infrared space telescope first spotted buckyballs in remnants of a white-dwarf star4. But in 1993, Maier’s team had already measured the wavelengths of light that buckyballs absorbed when encased in an unreactive frozen solid5, and astrophysicists had quickly found a tentative match to DIB patterns in the cosmos1.

Yet without knowing how gaseous buckyballs behave in space-like conditions, no one could claim a definitive match.

Maier’s team analysed that behaviour by measuring the light-absorption of buckyballs at a temperature of near-absolute zero and in an extremely high vacuum, achieved by trapping the ions using electric fields, in a buffer of neutral helium gas. “It was so technically challenging to create conditions such as in interstellar space that it took 20 years of experimental development,” says Maier.

“Assuming the identification holds up, this is a tremendous victory,” says Ben McCall, an astronomer at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who cautions that further astronomical measurements of DIBs are needed to prove beyond doubt that they exactly match the patterns seen in Maier’s lab work.

It is “certainly now appealing”, says Maier, that other DIBs are buckyball-related molecules, perhaps bonded with metals and other elements. But he adds that laboratory verification of this would be extremely demanding. “I would probably need another life to accomplish this,” he says. “But maybe a few youngsters somewhere in the world will take this up.”

Finding buckyballs in interstellar space shows that they are more abundant than previously thought, says Kroto. And the study suggests buckyballs can remain intact for millions of years and travel over great distances between the stars, adds McCall. "It's enormously exciting to think that such huge gas phase molecules could be ubiquitous throughout the interstellar medium of our galaxy!" he says.

Journal name:



References 4 and 5 were in the wrong order when this story was originally published. This has now been corrected.


In an earlier version of this story, the credit for the compound image omitted the relevant citations. This has now been corrected.


  1. Foing, B. H. & Ehrenfreund, P. Nature 369, 296298 (1994).

  2. Campbell, E. K. et al. Nature 523, 322325 (2015).

  3. Kroto, H. W. et al. Nature 318, 162163 (1985).

  4. Cami, J. et al. Science 329, 11801182 (2010).

  5. Fulara, J., Jakobi, M. & Maier, J. P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 211, 227234 (1993).

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.


Commenting is currently unavailable.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up



Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.