Abstract
Microtubules are born and reborn continuously, even during quiescence. These polymers are nucleated from templates, namely γ-tubulin ring complexes (γ-TuRCs) and severed microtubule ends. Using single-molecule biophysics, we show that nucleation from γ-TuRCs, axonemes and seed microtubules requires tubulin concentrations that lie well above the critical concentration. We measured considerable time lags between the arrival of tubulin and the onset of steady-state elongation. Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) alter these time lags. Catastrophe factors (MCAK and EB1) inhibited nucleation, whereas a polymerase (XMAP215) and an anti-catastrophe factor (TPX2) promoted nucleation. We observed similar phenomena in cells. We conclude that GTP hydrolysis inhibits microtubule nucleation by destabilizing the nascent plus ends required for persistent elongation. Our results explain how MAPs establish the spatial and temporal profile of microtubule nucleation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Voter, W. A. & Erickson, H. P. The kinetics of microtubule assembly. Evidence for a two-stage nucleation mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 259, 10430–10438 (1984).
Zheng, Y., Wong, M. L., Alberts, B. & Mitchison, T. Nucleation of microtubule assembly by a γ-tubulin-containing ring complex. Nature 378, 578–583 (1995).
Moritz, M., Braunfeld, M. B., Sedat, J. W., Alberts, B. & Agard, D. A. Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin-containing rings in the centrosome. Nature 378, 638–640 (1995).
Srayko, M., Kaya, A., Stamford, J. & Hyman, A. A. Identification and characterization of factors required for microtubule growth and nucleation in the early C. elegans embryo. Dev. Cell. 9, 223–236 (2005).
McNally, K., Audhya, A., Oegema, K. & McNally, F. J. Katanin controls mitotic and meiotic spindle length. J. Cell Biol. 175, 881–891 (2006).
Lindeboom, J. J. et al. A mechanism for reorientation of cortical microtubule arrays driven by microtubule severing. Science 342, 1245533 (2013).
Kollman, J. M., Polka, J. K., Zelter, A., Davis, T. N. & Agard, D. A. Microtubule nucleating γ-TuSC assembles structures with 13-fold microtubule-like symmetry. Nature 466, 879–882 (2010).
Kollman, J. M., Merdes, A., Mourey, L. & Agard, D. A. Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 709–721 (2011).
Oakley, B. R., Oakley, C. E., Yoon, Y. & Jung, M. K. γ-tubulin is a component of the spindle pole body that is essential for microtubule function in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell 61, 1289–1301 (1990).
Luders, J. & Stearns, T. Microtubule-organizing centres: a re-evaluation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 161–167 (2007).
Baas, P. W. & Ahmad, F. J. The plus ends of stable microtubules are the exclusive nucleating structures for microtubules in the axon. J. Cell Biol. 116, 1231–1241 (1992).
Piehl, M., Tulu, U. S., Wadsworth, P. & Cassimeris, L. Centrosome maturation: measurement of microtubule nucleation throughout the cell cycle by using GFP-tagged EB1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1584–1588 (2004).
Brugues, J., Nuzzo, V., Mazur, E. & Needleman, D. J. Nucleation and transport organize microtubules in metaphase spindles. Cell 149, 554–564 (2012).
Luders, J., Patel, U. K. & Stearns, T. GCP-WD is a γ-tubulin targeting factor required for centrosomal and chromatin-mediated microtubule nucleation. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 137–147 (2006).
Bre, M. H. & Karsenti, E. Effects of brain microtubule-associated proteins on microtubule dynamics and the nucleating activity of centrosomes. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 15, 88–98 (1990).
Gard, D. L. & Kirschner, M. W. A microtubule-associated protein from Xenopus eggs that specifically promotes assembly at the plus-end. J. Cell Biol. 105, 2203–2215 (1987).
Brouhard, G. J. et al. XMAP215 is a processive microtubule polymerase. Cell 132, 79–88 (2008).
Popov, A. V., Severin, F. & Karsenti, E. XMAP215 is required for the microtubule-nucleating activity of centrosomes. Curr. Biol. 12, 1326–1330 (2002).
Reber, S. B. et al. XMAP215 activity sets spindle length by controlling the total mass of spindle microtubules. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1116–1122 (2013).
Belmont, L. D. & Mitchison, T. J. Identification of a protein that interacts with tubulin dimers and increases the catastrophe rate of microtubules. Cell 84, 623–631 (1996).
Ringhoff, D. N. & Cassimeris, L. Stathmin regulates centrosomal nucleation of microtubules and tubulin dimer/polymer partitioning. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 3451–3458 (2009).
Heald, R. et al. Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts. Nature 382, 420–425 (1996).
Carazo-Salas, R. E. et al. Generation of GTP-bound Ran by RCC1 is required for chromatin-induced mitotic spindle formation. Nature 400, 178–181 (1999).
Wittmann, T., Boleti, H., Antony, C., Karsenti, E. & Vernos, I. Localization of the kinesin-like protein Xklp2 to spindle poles requires a leucine zipper, a microtubule-associated protein, and dynein. J. Cell Biol. 143, 673–685 (1998).
Gruss, O. J. et al. Chromosome-induced microtubule assembly mediated by TPX2 is required for spindle formation in HeLa cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 871–879 (2002).
Goshima, G., Mayer, M., Zhang, N., Stuurman, N. & Vale, R. D. Augmin: a protein complex required for centrosome-independent microtubule generation within the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 181, 421–429 (2008).
Petry, S., Groen, A. C., Ishihara, K., Mitchison, T. J. & Vale, R. D. Branching microtubule nucleation in Xenopus egg extracts mediated by augmin and TPX2. Cell 152, 768–777 (2013).
Schatz, C. A. et al. Importin α-regulated nucleation of microtubules by TPX2. EMBO J. 22, 2060–2070 (2003).
Mitchison, T. & Kirschner, M. Microtubule assembly nucleated by isolated centrosomes. Nature 312, 232–237 (1984).
Walker, R. A. et al. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1437–1448 (1988).
Mitchison, T. J. Localization of an exchangeable GTP binding site at the plus end of microtubules. Science 261, 1044–1047 (1993).
Meurer-Grob, P., Kasparian, J. & Wade, R. H. Microtubule structure at improved resolution. Biochemistry 40, 8000–8008 (2001).
Moritz, M., Braunfeld, M. B., Guenebaut, V., Heuser, J. & Agard, D. A. Structure of the γ-tubulin ring complex: a template for microtubule nucleation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 365–370 (2000).
Gardner, M. K. et al. Rapid microtubule self-assembly kinetics. Cell 146, 582–592 (2011).
Oosawa, F. & Asakura, S. Thermodynamics of the Polymerization of Protein Vol. 20 (Academic Press, 1975).
Mitchison, T. & Kirschner, M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 312, 237–242 (1984).
Drechsel, D. N., Hyman, A. A., Cobb, M. H. & Kirschner, M. W. Modulation of the dynamic instability of tubulin assembly by the microtubule-associated protein tau. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 1141–1154 (1992).
Hunter, A. W. et al. The kinesin-related protein MCAK is a microtubule depolymerase that forms an ATP-hydrolyzing complex at microtubule ends. Mol. Cell 11, 445–457 (2003).
Gardner, M. K., Zanic, M., Gell, C., Bormuth, V. & Howard, J. Depolymerizing kinesins Kip3 and MCAK shape cellular microtubule architecture by differential control of catastrophe. Cell 147, 1092–1103 (2011).
Helenius, J., Brouhard, G., Kalaidzidis, Y., Diez, S. & Howard, J. The depolymerizing kinesin MCAK uses lattice diffusion to rapidly target microtubule ends. Nature 441, 115–119 (2006).
Askham, J. M., Vaughan, K. T., Goodson, H. V. & Morrison, E. E. Evidence that an interaction between EB1 and p150(Glued) is required for the formation and maintenance of a radial microtubule array anchored at the centrosome. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 3627–3645 (2002).
Bieling, P. et al. Reconstitution of a microtubule plus-end tracking system in vitro. Nature 450, 1100–1105 (2007).
Vitre, B. et al. EB1 regulates microtubule dynamics and tubulin sheet closure in vitro. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 415–421 (2008).
Gruss, O. J. et al. Ran induces spindle assembly by reversing the inhibitory effect of importin α on TPX2 activity. Cell 104, 83–93 (2001).
Brunet, S. et al. Characterization of the TPX2 domains involved in microtubule nucleation and spindle assembly in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 5318–5328 (2004).
Hyman, A. A., Salser, S., Drechsel, D. N., Unwin, N. & Mitchison, T. J. Role of GTP hydrolysis in microtubule dynamics: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue, GMPCPP. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 1155–1167 (1992).
Hoebeke, J., Nijen, G. V. & Brabander, M. D. Interaction of oncodazole (r 17934), a new anti-tumoral drug, with rat brain tubulin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 69, 319–324 (1976).
Head, J., Lee, L. L., Field, D. J. & Lee, J. C. Equilibrium and rapid kinetic studies on nocodazole-tubulin interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 11060–11066 (1985).
Vasquez, R. J., Howell, B., Yvon, A. M., Wadsworth, P. & Cassimeris, L. Nanomolar concentrations of nocodazole alter microtubule dynamic instability in vivo and in vitro. Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 973–985 (1997).
Andrews, P. D. et al. Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev. Cell. 6, 253–268 (2004).
Vinh, D. B., Kern, J. W., Hancock, W. O., Howard, J. & Davis, T. N. Reconstitution and characterization of budding yeast γ-tubulin complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1144–1157 (2002).
Kollman, J. M. et al. The structure of the γ-tubulin small complex: implications of its architecture and flexibility for microtubule nucleation. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 207–215 (2008).
Kollman, J. M. et al. Ring closure activates yeast γ-turc for species-specific microtubule nucleation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 132–137 (2015).
Choi, Y. K., Liu, P., Sze, S. K., Dai, C. & Qi, R. Z. CDK5RAP2 stimulates microtubule nucleation by the γ-tubulin ring complex. J. Cell Biol. 191, 1089–1095 (2010).
Chretien, D., Fuller, S. D. & Karsenti, E. Structure of growing microtubule ends: two-dimensional sheets close into tubes at variable rates. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1311–1328 (1995).
Bechstedt, S., Lu, K. & Brouhard, G. J. Doublecortin recognizes the longitudinal curvature of the microtubule end and lattice. Curr. Biol. 24, 2366–2375 (2014).
Wang, H. W. & Nogales, E. Nucleotide-dependent bending flexibility of tubulin regulates microtubule assembly. Nature 435, 911–915 (2005).
Rice, L. M., Montabana, E. A. & Agard, D. A. The lattice as allosteric effector: structural studies of αβ- and γ-tubulin clarify the role of GTP in microtubule assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5378–5383 (2008).
Janosi, I. M., Chretien, D. & Flyvbjerg, H. Modeling elastic properties of microtubule tips and walls. Eur. Biophys. J. 27, 501–513 (1998).
VanBuren, V., Cassimeris, L. & Odde, D. J. Mechanochemical model of microtubule structure and self-assembly kinetics. Biophys. J. 89, 2911–2926 (2005).
Castoldi, M. & Popov, A. V. Purification of brain tubulin through two cycles of polymerization-depolymerization in a high-molarity buffer. Protein Expr. Purif. 32, 83–88 (2003).
Wieczorek, M., Chaaban, S. & Brouhard, G. Macromolecular crowding pushes catalyzed microtubule growth to near the theoretical limit. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 6, 383–392 (2013).
Gell, C. et al. Microtubule dynamics reconstituted in vitro and imaged by single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 95, 221–245 (2010).
Waterman-Storer, C. M. Microtubule/organelle motility assays. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Unit 13.1 (2001).
Bechstedt, S. & Brouhard, G. J. Doublecortin recognizes the 13-protofilament microtubule cooperatively and tracks microtubule ends. Dev. Cell. 23, 181–192 (2012).
Norholm, M. A mutant Pfu DNA polymerase designed for advanced uracil-excision DNA engineering. BMC Biotechnol. 10, 21 (2010).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
Demchouk, A. O., Gardner, M. K. & Odde, D. J. Microtubule tip tracking and tip structures at the nanometer scale using digital fluorescence microscopy. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 4, 192–204 (2011).
Noujaim, M., Bechstedt, S., Wieczorek, M. & Brouhard, G. J. Microtubules accelerate the kinase activity of aurora-b by a reduction in dimensionality. PLoS ONE 9, e86786 (2014).
Rusan, N. M., Fagerstrom, C. J., Yvon, A. M. & Wadsworth, P. Cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in living cells expressing green fluorescent protein-α tubulin. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 971–980 (2001).
Acknowledgements
We thank H. Higgs for suggesting the hysteresis experiment (Fig. 2) during the question period of an American Society for Cell Biology mini-symposium. We thank L. Cassimeris (Lehigh University, USA) for providing the LLCPK1:EB1–GFP cell line, A. Bird (Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Germany) for providing the U2OS:EB3–mCherry cell line, and R. Ohi (Vanderbilt University, USA) for providing the LLCPK1:GFP–tubulin cell line. We thank the Cell Imaging and Analysis Network for microscopy support. We thank C. Rocha for help with immunoblot sample preparation. We thank A. Bird, C. Friel, J. Howard, L. Rice and M. Zanic for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR, MOP-111265 to G.J.B.), by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, no. 372593-09 to G.J.B.), and by McGill University. M.W. is supported by an NSERC CGS-D award and a Fonds de Recherche du Quebec—Nature et Technologie Bourse de Doctorat en Recherche. S.C. is supported by the NSERC CREATE training program in the Cellular Dynamics of Macromolecular Complexes and an NSERC CGS-D. G. Brouhard is a CIHR New Investigator.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.W., S.B. and G.J.B. conceived the project. M.W. performed nucleation experiments, characterized the MAPs, and imaged cells. S.B. established infrastructure for molecular biology and protein expression. S.C. performed electron microscopy experiments. M.W. and G.J.B. analysed data, developed models, and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Integrated supplementary information
Supplementary Figure 1 Controls for centrosome, axoneme and GMPCPP nucleation experiments in Fig. 1.
(A) Immunoblot against γ-tubulin for a purified centrosome fraction. (B) Immunofluorescence of purified centrosomes after microtubule nucleation showing αβ-tubulin (left) and γ-tubulin (middle). In the merged image (right), the γ-tubulin signal is at the centre of the microtubule aster. (C) Overlay of our centrosome nucleation data (Fig. 1c) onto data from Fig. 4A of ref. 29, NPG. (D) Overlay of our axoneme nucleation data (Fig. 1f) onto data from Fig. 6 of ref. 30, Rockefeller Univ. Press. (E) Images from two consecutive nucleation experiments performed on the same set of GMPCPP seeds. In experiment #1, 33% of the seeds produced microtubules (left, white arrows). In experiment #2, after thorough rinsing, 25% of the seeds produced microtubules (right, white arrows). The theoretical probability that a seed produced microtubules twice agrees well with the measured value (see text at right). n = 214 GMPCPP seeds measured consecutively in the same experiment.
Supplementary Figure 2 Controls for hysteresis experiments in Fig. 2 and in-house spontaneous nucleation measurements.
(A) Plot of the average background intensity from fluorescent tubulin against time for the experiment in Fig. 2d. The intensity increases when the tubulin concentration is increased from 4 μM to 15 μM. When the solution is exchanged from 15 μM back to 4 μM, the intensity returns to the baseline, 4 μM tubulin level, indicating that the solution exchange is complete. Error bars represent the s.d. of intensity values from a 20 × 20 pixel box from one experiment. (B) Plot of the absorbance at 350 nm (A350), or turbidity, against time for solutions containing the indicated concentration of tubulin. An increase in A350 indicates polymer formation. (C) Plot of the A350 values at t = 60 min against tubulin concentration. A fit to data for which A350 > 0.05 (red line) gives an x-intercept of 21 ± 4.2 μM tubulin, which is the critical concentration for spontaneous nucleation. (D) Images of Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gels for the spin-down spontaneous nucleation assay, showing the total tubulin (top gel) and the polymeric tubulin in the pellet (bottom gel). (E) Plot of the concentration of pelleted tubulin against total tubulin concentration. A fit of the data for which the concentration of tubulin in the pellet ≥ 1 μM (red line) gives an x-intercept of 21 ± 7.9 μM. For increasing tubulin concentrations, n = 2, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4 and 2 independent experiments, respectively.
Supplementary Figure 3 Controls for nucleation time distribution experiments in Fig. 3.
(A) Plot of the first nucleation time against the second nucleation time for two consecutive experiments in which the same set of GMPCPP seeds were exposed to 12 μM tubulin for t = 15 min. If a seed did not produce a microtubule during the experiment, its nucleation time was recorded as >15 min. A red line shows the result predicted by the hypothesis that the seeds will have identical nucleation times in both experiments. The data clearly do not fall on the line. n = 118 GMPCPP seeds. (B) Plot of the background intensity from fluorescent tubulin against time averaged from several experiments. The intensity increases quickly as tubulin is introduced. The red line shows a fit of the data to an exponential function, y(t) = y0 + aekt. From this fit, the time at which the intensity reaches 95% of its plateau was calculated (t95% = 4 s, black dotted line). Error bars represent s.d. n = 3 independent flow-in experiments. (C) Plot of the flow cell temperature against time during a typical experiment. The red line is a fit of the temperature data to an exponential function, y(t) = y0 + aekt. From this fit, the time at which the temperature reaches 95% of its plateau was calculated (t95% = 17 s, black dotted line). Error bars represent s.d. n = 3 independent experiments.
Supplementary Figure 4 Controls for the effects of MCAK and EB1 on nucleation in Fig. 4.
(A) Image of a Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel showing the purified protein fractions for MCAK, EB1, and EB1-GFP used in this study. (B) Plot of the depolymerization rate of GMPCPP microtubules against MCAK concentration. Error bars represent the s.d. For increasing MCAK concentrations, n = 10, 11, 10, 11 and 7 GMPCPP microtubules analysed in one experiment. (C) Kymographs showing double-cycled GMPCPP seeds used in our nucleation assays without (left) and with (right) 10 nM MCAK. Double-cycled GMPCPP seeds are resistant to depolymerization at these MCAK concentrations. (D) Cumulative frequency distribution of the time until catastrophe in the presence of 200 nM EB1 (red) and in control buffers (blue) at 10 μM tubulin. The solid lines are fits to the Gamma distribution, as described in Gardner et al.(2011). n = 186 (with 200 nM EB1) and n = 111 (without EB1) catastrophe events collected from different experiments. (E) In the absence of added salt, EB1-GFP binds along the GMPCPP seeds, the GDP lattice and the tip of growing microtubules. Adding 100 mM KCl to the imaging solution reduces the affinity of EB1-GFP to the seed and lattice, but end-binding persists. The tubulin concentration in these experiments was 20 μM. The EB1-GFP concentration in these experiments was 200 nM. (F) In high salt conditions, EB1 still makes nucleation difficult (green squares), arguing that EB1 lattice binding does not contribute to nucleation inhibition. The solid green line is the sigmoidal equation fit. The fit from the control data is shown in light blue for comparison. For increasing tubulin concentrations, n = 102, 92, 105 and 140 GMPCPP seeds pooled from 3 experiments. Error bars represent s.e.m.
Supplementary Figure 5 Controls for the effects of TPX2, XMAP215 and GMPCPP–tubulin on nucleation in Figs 5 and 6.
(A) Image of a Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel of a microtubule cosedimenation assay done with 200 nM TPX2. The control lane indicates a calculated amount of TPX2 that would represent 100% cosedimentation. The solid triangle points to the cropped area of the original gel provided in Supplementary Fig. 7B. (B) Image of a Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel of the SUMO-tagged TPX2 truncation constructs NT, CT1 and CT2 expressed and purified from bacteria. The solid triangle points to the cropped area of the original gel provided in Supplementary Fig. 7C. (C) (Top) Image of a Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel of a cosedimentation assay done with 200 nM of NT, CT1 or CT2 in the presence (+) and absence (−) of 1 μM taxol-stabilized microtubules. (Bottom) Image of a Western blot against the 6xHis-tag confirming that only NT cosediments with microtubules. (D) Image of a Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel showing the purified protein fractions for XMAP215 and rKin430-GFP. The solid triangle points to the cropped area of the original gel shown in Supplementary Fig. 7D. (E) Plot of microtubule growth rates against tubulin concentration in the presence of 200 nM XMAP215 (red) and in control buffers (blue). For increasing tubulin concentrations, n = 3, 29, 41 and 53 microtubules, respectively with 200 nM XMAP215 and 31, 47, 21 and 18 microtubules, respectively without XMAP215. Data were pooled across 3 experiments. Error bars represent s.e.m. (F) Plot of the nucleation probability in the presence of 200 nM rKin430-GFP (kinesin-1). The solid red line is the sigmoidal equation fit. The fit from the control data is shown in light blue for comparison. For increasing tubulin concentrations, n = 15, 10, 10, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 20 and 20 GMPCPP seeds, respectively. Data were pooled across 1–3 experiments. Error bars represent s.e.m.
Supplementary Figure 6 Controls and model for effects of tubulin depletion by nocodazole on nucleation in cells in Fig. 7.
(A) Plot of the microtubule growth rate against nocodazole concentration in two cell lines (U2OS, blue; LLCPK1, red). The microtubule growth rates were inferred from the velocity of EB comets. For increasing nocodazole concentrations, n = 25(2 independent experiments), 13(2), 13(2) and 10(2) (for LLCPK1 cells) and 20(2), 17(2), 12(2) and 12(2) (for U2OS cells) EB comets. Error bars represent the s.d. (B) Plot of the percentage of free soluble tubulin as a function of nocodazole concentration. Assuming a 1:1 stoichiometry and equilibrium conditions, we model the percentage of free tubulin as % Free Tubuli n = 100/(Keq−1[Nocodazole] + 1), where Keq is the equilibrium constant. The range of measured equilibrium constants is indicated. (C) Theoretical plot of the centrosomal nucleation rate (comets ⋅ min−1 emerging from the centrosome) against predicted tubulin concentration in two cell lines (U2OS, blue; LLCPK1, red). The plot assumes an equilibrium constant for tubulin:nocodazole binding of 1 μM and a baseline soluble tubulin concentration of 10 μM. (D) Plot of the centrosomal nucleation rate against colchicine concentration in two cell lines (U2OS, blue; LLCPK1, red). For increasing colchicine concentrations, n = 12, 19, 18 and 19 U2OS cells, respectively and n = 29, 17, 20, 22 and 22 LLCPK1 cells, respectively. Data were pooled across 2 experiments. Error bars represent the s.d. (E) Kymographs of EB1-GFP end-tracking in vitro in control buffers (left), in the presence of 200 nM nocodazole (middle), or in the presence of 1 μM colchicine (right). (F) Images of Western blots performed against EB1 (left) and tubulin (right) on LLCPK1:EB1-GFP cells. The EB1 blot shows a band at ∼55 kDa in the LLCPK1:EB1-GFP cell line that is absent in the control LLCPK1 cells. We estimate EB1-GFP overexpression at ∼30% relative to the endogenous level based on the intensity of this band measured from two independent blots.
Supplementary Figure 7 Uncropped SDS-PAGE gels.
(A) Uncropped scanned image file of the TPX2 purification SDS-PAGE gel shown in Fig. 5a. (B) Uncropped scanned image file of the TPX2 cosedimentation assay SDS-PAGE gel shown in Supplementary Fig. 5A. (C) Uncropped scanned image file of the SUMO-tagged TPX2 truncation construct purification SDS-PAGE gel shown in Supplementary Fig. 5C. (D) Uncropped scanned image file of the MAP purification gel shown in Supplementary Fig. 5D.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 758 kb)
Microtubule nucleation from GMPCPP seeds at 12 μM tubulin.
Epifluorescence images of GMPCPP microtubule seeds (magenta) combined with total-internal-reflection fluorescence images of elongating microtubules (green) were recorded at 10 s intervals for 15 min. Some GMPCPP seeds are observed to produce microtubules immediately while others produce microtubules after a time lag. Some GMPCPP seeds do not produce microtubules during the experiment. Video playback is 100× real-time (see time stamp). (AVI 12756 kb)
Hysteresis in microtubule elongation experiments.
Epifluorescence images of GMPCPP microtubule seeds (magenta) combined with total-internal-reflection fluorescence images of elongating microtubules (green) were recorded at 10 s intervals. At the start of the experiment, the GMPCPP seeds are exposed to 4 μM tubulin (indicated). After a short period, the solution is exchanged with 15 μM tubulin (indicated). At this concentration, the GMPCPP seeds produce microtubules readily. The solution is exchanged back to 4 μM tubulin (indicated). Microtubules continue to elongate until they undergo catastrophe, after which the GMPCPP seed is dormant. Video playback is 100× real-time (see time stamp). (AVI 2544 kb)
LLCPK1 cells expressing GFP-EB1.
Spinning-disk confocal images of LLCPK1 cells constitutively expressing GFP-EB1. Images were taken every 2 s. Playback is 20× real-time (see time stamp). (AVI 19090 kb)
LLCPK1 cells expressing GFP-EB1 in the presence of 40 nM nocodazole.
Spinning-disk confocal images of LLCPK1 cells constitutively expressing GFP-EB1 in the presence of 40 nM nocodazole. Fewer ‘comets’ emerge from the centrosome. Images were taken every 2 s. Playback is 20× real-time (see time stamp). (AVI 19090 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wieczorek, M., Bechstedt, S., Chaaban, S. et al. Microtubule-associated proteins control the kinetics of microtubule nucleation. Nat Cell Biol 17, 907–916 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3188
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3188
This article is cited by
-
Identification of prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers in type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma
World Journal of Surgical Oncology (2023)
-
Microtubule nucleation and γTuRC centrosome localization in interphase cells require ch-TOG
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Measuring and modeling forces generated by microtubules
Biophysical Reviews (2023)
-
circSETD3 regulates MAPRE1 through miR-615-5p and miR-1538 sponges to promote migration and invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Oncogene (2021)
-
Effects of the protein GCP4 on gametophyte development in Arabidopsis thaliana
Protoplasma (2021)