Commentary in 2006

Filter By:

Article Type
Year
  • Is uncertainty concerning the regulation of antimicrobial drug trials stifling investment in infectious disease treatments? Here, experts from a large pharma company and a biotech firm provide their perspectives.

    • Randall Brenner
    • Evelyn J Ellis-Grosse
    • Roger Echols
    Commentary
  • Antibiotics markets are huge and the need for new classes of antibiotics is great, but the risks give investors pause.

    • Ralph E Christoffersen
    Commentary
  • To avoid duplication of effort, slow adoption and inefficiency in development, those developing biological standards need to communicate more with each other, attract help from experts in the ontology/standards communities and keep focused on needs of users.

    • Catherine A Ball
    Commentary
  • Contrary to conventional thinking, there are compelling reasons for investors to consider early-stage life science ventures, especially in the context of a maturing biotech business 'ecosystem'.

    • Bruce L Booth
    Commentary
  • Objective quality control indices are needed to facilitate clinical implementation of DNA microarrays used in transcriptional profiling as well as other types of genomic analysis.

    • Hanlee Ji
    • Ronald W Davis
    Commentary
  • The US Environmental Protection Agency is developing a new guidance that outlines best practice in the submission, quality assurance, analysis and management of genomics data for environmental applications.

    • David J Dix
    • Kathryn Gallagher
    • William H Farland
    Commentary
  • By rejecting gene-spliced ingredients in their products, some major food companies may be making foods that are less safe and wholesome for consumers—and that expose them to litigation.

    • Henry I Miller
    • Gregory Conko
    • Drew L Kershen
    Commentary
  • Although technology adoption and remuneration are significant barriers to the development and implementation of innovative diagnostics, health imperialism may be just as important.

    • Paul R Billings
    Commentary
  • Tests for identifying the world's most important microbial pathogens are antiquated, inaccurate and inadequate. Innovative public-private partnership is needed to develop and produce new infectious disease diagnostics that are more rapid and of greater accuracy and sensitivity.

    • Mark D Perkins
    • Peter M Small
    Commentary
  • A major outreach effort is under way that recruits scientific and technological expertise in industry and academia to optimize regulatory decision-making for next-generation diagnostic tests.

    • Scott Gottlieb
    • Janet Woodcock
    Commentary
  • The value of a diagnostic test should be assessed in the overall context of disease management.

    • Lee Hartwell
    • David Mankoff
    • Elizabeth Swisher
    Commentary