Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Resource
  • Published:

Practical considerations for disaster preparedness and continuity management in research facilities

Abstract

Many research facility managers, veterinarians and directors are familiar with the principles of Good Laboratory Practice, requirements of the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International, tenets of biosecurity and standards of animal welfare and housing but may be less familiar with the ideas of business continuity. But business continuity considerations are as applicable to research facilities as they are to other institutions. The authors discuss how business continuity principles can be applied in the research context and propose that such application, or 'research continuity management,' enables a focused but wide-reaching approach to disaster preparedness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Anatomy of an incident.
Figure 2: Simple risk matrix model.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knight, R.F. & Pretty, D.J. The Impact of Catastrophes on Shareholder Value (Templeton College, Oxford, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. BS ISO 22301:2012. Societal security. Business continuity management systems. Requirements. (British Standards Institute, London, 2012).

  3. ISO/IEC 27001:2005. Information technology. Security techniques. Information security management systems. Requirements. (British Standards Institute, London, 2005).

  4. Quiggin, J. The Y2K scare: causes, costs and cures. Australian J. Public Admin. 64, 46–55 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edn. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011).

  6. Animal Welfare Act Regulations. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 9, Parts 2 and 3. Handling Animals; Contingency Plans.

  7. Allianz Risk Pulse: Focus on Business Risks 2013 (Allianz SE, Munich, Germany, 2013). http://assets.knowledge.allianz.com/downloads/agcs_risk_barometer_business_2013.pdf.

  8. ASIS Disaster Preparation Guide (ASIS International, Alexandria, VA, 2003). http://www.scnus.org/local_includes/downloads/9552.pdf.

  9. Birmingham City Council, 2005. Risk Management Strategy.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norman Mortell.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mortell, N., Nicholls, S. Practical considerations for disaster preparedness and continuity management in research facilities. Lab Anim 42, F18–F24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.391

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.391

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing