Abstract
Asexual reproduction is one of the most important traits in the evolutionary history of corals. No real-time observations of asexual reproduction in azooxanthellate solitary scleractinian corals have been conducted to date. Here, we describe previously unknown aspects of asexual reproduction by using Truncatoflabellum spheniscus (Family Flabellidae) based on observations of transverse division conducted over 1200 days. The findings revealed that (1) transverse division was caused by decalcification; (2) compared to the anthocyathus (upper part of the divided corallum), the soft parts of the anthocaulus (lower part of the divided corallum) were severely damaged and injured during division; (3) these injuries were repaired rapidly; and (4) the anthocaulus regrew and repeatedly produced anthocyathi by means of transverse division. Differences in the patterns of soft-part regeneration and repair, as well as differences in skeletal growth rates between the anthocaulus and the anthocyathus imply that the ecological requirements and reproductive success are different from each other immediately after division. The findings provide important clues for unravelling why asexual reproduction appeared frequently in free-living corals, and the extent to which those modes of reproduction has affected the adaptive and evolutionary success of scleractinian corals throughout the Phanerozoic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Asexual reproduction plays an important role in corals as it increases the number of individuals and their capacity to adapt to changes in their environment. Modes of asexual reproduction have been examined extensively in extinct and extant colonial corals, especially in terms of the structural and developmental constraints imposed by skeletal development1,2,3,4,5. Both zooxanthellate and azooxanthellate free-living, whether solitary or colonial, scleractinian corals employ asexual reproduction; occasionally, these modes of asexual reproduction are accompanied by skeletal decalcification (e.g., transverse division, longitudinal division, and anthoblast production)6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Asexual reproduction associated with decalcification in solitary scleractinians has been reported in at least 34 genera in nine families (i.e., Guyniidae, Athemiphylliidae, Dendrophylliidae, Caryophylliidae, Flabellidae, Turbinoliidae, Fungiidae, Poritidae, and Mussidae)11,14,15,16. Transverse division in zooxanthellate fungiid corals was initially observed in the 19th century17,18,19. Direct observations in the field and laboratory have revealed that (1) division (disc detachment) is caused by skeletal decalcification, (2) an anthocaulus periodically and repeatedly produces an anthocyathus, and (3) the fungiids show alternations of sexual and asexual generations in their life history8,9,20,21,22,23,24. However, no real-time observations of asexual reproduction in azooxanthellate solitary corals have been conducted to date, mainly because of their deep-sea habitats and difficulties associated with sampling and long-term monitoring of living individuals. Consequently, details of the modes of asexual reproduction employed by these corals remain elusive, as studies are typically limited to skeletal morphology (division scars) and structural evidence of rejuvenescence (i.e., regrowth of anthocaulus after transverse division)6,7,10,25. In particular, little is known about what happens to the soft parts of corals during division, or the regeneration mechanisms, timing, duration, and cycles of division, and skeletal growth rates before and after division. However, studies on solitary corals of asexual origin have provided invaluable clues for clarifying the various processes associated with asexual reproduction itself and increase in densities (i.e., aggregations in individual corals). Aggregations in reef corals as a result of asexual fragmentation can be found in free-living solitary and/or colonial corals12,16,21,26,27,28.
The genus Truncatoflabellum (Family Flabellidae) has a flabellate morphology and several pairs of spines on the corallum edges, although some species do not form spines. Truncatoflabellum is exclusively azooxanthellate, solitary, and clonal reproduction occurs by means of transverse division7,29. The anthocaulus, which is formed by sexual reproduction, gives rise to the anthocyathus (clone individual) by transverse division, which involves decalcification of the skeleton7,29; the anthocyathus can only reproduce sexually7,25.
In this long-term study (1200 days), we observed and monitored Truncatoflabellum spheniscus in a tank in order to obtain a detailed understanding of the structural processes associated with transverse division, especially aspects related to the division and repair of soft and skeletal parts of the anthocaulus and anthocyathus, respectively. In addition, skeletal growth rates were estimated in each anthocaulus and anthocyathus and the mode of transverse division in Truncatoflabellum was interpreted within the context of the adaption and evolution of free-living scleractinian corals.
Results
Transverse division
The process of transverse division in mature anthocauli was initiated by decalcification of the calical (inner) parts of walls, immediately below the level of the lateral spines and at neighbouring septa. As decalcification progressed, the parts of the wall that had lost its luster and appeared as a white band measuring 0.1–0.2 mm on the corallum surface (Fig. 1A–C). Circular and irregularly shaped beaded pores subsequently appeared between the septa on the decalcified areas of corallum walls. Once decalcification had proceeded around the full circumference of the anthocaulus, a gap developed, separating the upper (anthocyathus) and lower (anthocaulus) parts of the corallites, which remained connected to each other by their soft parts alone (Figs 1D,E and 2A–C). Unable to support the weight of the upper part of the corallum (anthocyathus), the thin membranes and mesenterial filaments constituting the soft parts stretched and tore free from the lower part of the corallum (anthocaulus) (Figs 1F and 2D–F).
Immediately after dividing, the uppermost peripheries of the septa and the wall of the anthocaulus, which were not yet covered by soft tissues, turned white due to decalcification (Figs 2G,H and 3A,B). Deeply incised hollow structures attributable to decalcification were observed at the central parts of septa (i.e., rapid accretion deposits30) (Figs 2G and 3A,B). Columellae did not form in the centre of the calice, where soft tissues remained (Figs 2G and 3B). The soft tissues were severely damaged and there were no mouths and tentacles in the anthocaulus (Figs 2G and 3B). However, mesenterial filaments were recognized in the calice (Figs 2G and 3B). Immediately after division, the height, greater calicular diameter, and lesser calicular diameter of the anthocauli were 6.22 ± 0.5 mm, 7.89 ± 0.5 mm, and 4.21 ± 0.1 mm, respectively (mean ± SE; N = 8).
In the basal part of the anthocyathus, the peripheries of septa and inner sides of walls were covered with thick stereome (i.e., thickening deposits30) (Figs 2H, 4A,B). A complete set of first (S1) and second cycles of septa (S2), along with eight third-cycle septa (S3) were fused axially to form a columella (Figs 2H, 4A). In some cases, S4 septa could also be recognized at the calicular base of the corallum. Decalcification was restricted to parts that were originally septa (Fig. 4), and no traces of decalcification were observed in the columella or on the thick stereomes (i.e., thickened deposits) on septa and walls (Fig. 4). Stereomes were observed on parts of septa, sometimes as early as immediately after division (Fig. 4A,B). At the basal region of the anthocyathus, 20 to 24 pits encircled by septa, walls, and columella were infilled with soft tissues (Figs 2H and 4A); at the upper part of anthocyathus, relatively little damage occurred and the polyp was still capable of extending its tentacles, even immediately after division (Fig. 1F).
Regeneration of the anthocaulus polyp
The extensive tissue damage associated with transverse division in the anthocaulus meant that polyps had no mouth, tentacles or oral disc (Figs 2G and 3B). One day after division, sheet-like tissues formed along the periphery of the calice; no oral disc was present in the centre of the calice but numerous mesenterial filaments were present (Fig. 3C). Two days after division, these sheet-like tissues extended to near the centre of the calice, and the uppermost part (hereafter referred to as divided part) of the septa was partly covered with soft tissue (Fig. 3D). Three days after division, the sheet-like tissues had extended further and completely covered the part of the calice where the polyp resides, preventing mesenterial filaments from protruding beyond the sheet-like tissues (Fig. 3E). Seven days after division, two slits formed independently in the centre of oral disc parallel to two directive septa (Fig. 3F). Eight days after division, a mouth formed from an opening in the oral disc between the two slits (Fig. 3G). Small knob-like protrusions (hereafter referred to as tentacle buds) were scattered around a mouth. The anthocaulus polyp was able to open and close the mouth to capture food by moving the mesenterial filaments instead of tentacles. In a marked contrast to the marginal parts of septa, the axial parts of septa were mostly enveloped by soft tissues (Fig. 3G). By 15 days after the transverse division, the mouth and its surrounding musculature had regenerated completely, and more than 30 tentacles surrounded the oral disc (Fig. 3H). The tentacle tips became knobbed and were shaped like acrospheres (i.e., thickened tentacle tips containing batteries of nematocysts, which may show an aberrant pigmentation). Nineteen days after the division, acrospheres had regenerated at the tentacle tips and tentacles were able to capture food without extending laterally (Fig. 3I). Septa extended upward along the same axis as preexisting septa, and rejuvenescence was observed in the walls, which started to form upon inner portions of divided ones.
Repairs of divided part of anthocyathus
Immediately after the transverse division, 20 pits bordered by septa, walls, and columella penetrated into the interior of the anthocyathus resulting in extensive soft tissue damage at the basal part of the anthocyathus (Figs 2H and 4A). Mesenterial filaments extruded from several pits and columella and stereome surfaces were covered with films of soft tissue (Fig. 4A). One day after the transverse division, several pits were covered by a thin layer of soft tissues, while the remaining pits had mesenterial filaments extruding from them. Thin, thread-like soft tissues, which formed from the thin soft tissues covering the columella and stereome, formed a network of threads and were connected to tissues in the pits (Fig. 4B). Three days after division, all of the pits were covered with soft tissues, some of which had the appearance of tangled clumps and were derived from the thread-like soft tissues (Fig. 4C). Six days after division, thin horizontal skeletons were observed along the outer rims of the pits (Fig. 4D). Eight days after division, the pit-infilling process progressed gradually along the plane of the thin soft tissues toward the pit centre (Fig. 4E), and by 17 days after the transverse division, all of the pits were completely occluded by skeletal partitions (Fig. 4F).
Regrowth of anthocaulus skeletons
Six instances of transverse division in Truncatoflabellum were monitored meticulously. Approximately 15 days after division, the walls extended upward from the divided parts in a process referred to as rejuvenescence. The regenerated walls grew upward, with the greater calicular diameter remaining almost unchanged in the early stages of regrowth (Fig. 5A,B). About 150 days after division, the direction of wall growth changed markedly, especially the edges of the corallum, leading to the formation of a pair of spines (Fig. 5C,D). Approximately 200 days after division, the spines developed into hollow tube-like structures, which subsequently developed separately from the wall (Fig. 5E–G). The spines, which had very acute tips, ceased growing approximately 400 days after division (Fig. 5H). At approximately 500 days after division, a white band characteristic of decalcification appeared along the outer surface of anthocaulus walls just below the level of lateral spines (Fig. 5I). Approximately 700 days after division, decalcification progressed and the direction of wall growth changed drastically to form new pair of lateral spines (Fig. 5J). Approximately 900 days after division, the decalcified part of the wall surface almost disappeared and decalcification was completed (Fig. 5K). The next transverse division occurred at approximately 1000 days after division (Fig. 5L). The mean time interval between the development of transverse divisions was 982 ± 134 days (N = 3).
Skeletal growth rates
The linear growth rates for anthocauli and anthocyathi were 8.8 ± 1.4 and 3.6 ± 0.6 mm yr−1, respectively (N = 6; Fig. 6). Analysis by paired t-tests revealed significant differences (P < 0.01) between the linear growth rates for anthocauli and anthocyathi. The growth rate for the repaired parts at the basal scar of anthocyathi was 8.9 ± 1.0 mm yr−1 (mean ± SE; N = 4).
Growth rates were obtained for the full size range of Truncatoflabellum spheniscus anthocauli (Fig. 7). The growth rates for the anthocauli varied according to coral height. Thus, individuals measuring 4–8 mm in height grew 8.7 ± 1.9 mm yr−1 (N = 18), individuals measuring 8–12 mm in height grew 3.3 ± 0.6 mm yr−1 (N = 32), individuals measuring 12–16 mm in height grew 3.7 ± 0.9 mm yr−1 (N = 16), and individuals measuring 16–20 mm in height grew 13.7 ± 3.0 mm yr−1 (N = 5).
Discussion
Real-time observations of the transverse divisions in the azooxanthellate scleractinian Truncatoflabellum spheniscus revealed the following: (1) transverse division was caused by decalcification; (2) compared to the anthocyathus (upper part of divided corallum), the soft parts of the anthocaulus (lower part of divided corallum) were severely damaged and injured at the time of the division; (3) these injuries were repaired rapidly; and (4) the anthocaulus quickly regrew and repeatedly produced anthocyathi by transverse division.
Decalcification of Truncatoflabellum was initiated on the septa and the calical sides of walls (Fig. 1A–C). The observed decalcification processes were very similar to those reported in fungiid corals8,11,13,20,22,23,24. The anthocyathus of Truncatoflabellum has a thick stereome and columella at the aboral base immediately above the site where decalcification occurs (Figs 2H and 4A). Differences in skeletal characteristics (skeletal thickening patterns) were observed between the anthocaulus and anthocyathus stages immediately after division (Fig. 2G,H), implying that skeletal formation had already been initiated before division. The extent of the soft parts connecting the anthocyathus to the anthocaulus was also limited, which meant that the damaged parts on the aboral bases of the anthocyathus stage could be repaired quickly after division (Fig. 4). In addition, the mesenteries, coelenteron, and other essential organs were elevated by the development of thickened deposits, which enable the anthocyathus to continue feeding, protect itself and produce gametes after division. The anthocyathus is considerably larger than the anthocaulus at the time of division. The flabellate morphology and large surface area of Truncatoflabellum prevents the coral from sinking into soft substrates25. Similarly, the increased thickening deposits in the lower parts of anthocyathus might contribute towards an increase in stability in substrates, as well as keeping the calice oriented towards the sea surface which would be advantageous for its food acquisition, as seen in other free-living corals31,32,33. The skeletal structure of the anthocyathus therefore appears to have a reproductive as well as an ecological function that facilitates free-living on soft substrates.
In contrast, thickening deposits on the septa and calicular surfaces of the walls of the anthocaulus stage is very thin (Figs 2G and 3B), implying that the anthocaulus has sufficient space for soft tissues in the calice. Unlike the severely injured polypal parts of the anthocaulus (Figs 2G and 3A,B), the presence of calical tissues and spaces in the anthocaulus calice would facilitate the efficient regeneration of the polyp and accommodate the coelenteron after division34,35. By 3 days after division, sheet-like tissues completely covered the damaged parts of the polyp in the calice (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, a mouth was regenerated after only 8 days to capture food by moving the mesenterial filaments (Fig. 3G), suggesting the presence of a digestive coelenteron before the appearance of tentacles. In polyps of the starlet sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis, wound closure occurs very soon after budding36. However, in Truncatoflabellum, rapid wound closure is difficult because the soft parts are attached to the skeletal surface by desmocytes37. It is possible that the anthocaulus of Truncatoflabellum uses the sheet-like tissues for wound closure and the mesenterial filaments for protection, albeit temporarily. The tentacles formed from knob-like protrusions 7 days after division (Fig. 3G–I). This was similar to tentacle regeneration in N. vectensis, in which budding occurs perpendicular to the primary body axis36. Regeneration in Fungia fungites occurs as follows: a detachment scar of stalk was covered rapidly by regenerating soft tissues almost within one day; one week later, skeletons were secreted with no complete mouth and tentacles8. Although Fungia and Truncatoflabellum belong to different families38, the regeneration processes are similar.
Compared to the polyp of the anthocyathus, which was not severely damaged during and after division and continued to expand, the polypal tissues of the anthocaulus stage were severely damaged (Fig. 1F). These observations suggest that damage allocation associated with transverse division in Truncatoflabellum differs between the anthocyathus and anthocaulus, with the anthocaulus (asexual phase) taking precedence over the anthocyathus (sexual phase). These modes of transverse division are totally different from those of longitudinal division, in which the offsets inherit the tentacles and a mouth from their parents. A trade-off relationship between regeneration and reproduction has been suggested for many colonial corals39,40. In the anthocyathus of the solitary scleractinian, Fungia granulosa, sexual reproduction is favoured if energetic and cellular reserves are insufficient for both tissue repair and reproduction34. However, the life cycle of Truncatoflabellum is characterized by the distinct alternation of generations (asexual phase in anthocauli vs. sexual in anthocyathi)7,25. It is therefore considered that an anthocaulus of Truncatoflabellum will use all of its energetic and cellular reserves to regeneration during and after transverse division without attempting sexual reproduction. This method of energy allocation in the anthocaulus stage is considered to result in efficient polypal repair and growth following transverse division, even if the polypal tissues are extensively damaged for a time. In contrast, the anthocyathus experiences considerably less tissue damage during the transition from the previous anthocaulus. The anthocyathus can therefore expend considerably more energy on sexual reproduction as it minimizes the extent of regeneration. The alternation of generations is considered to be one of the best ways to solve reproduction-regeneration trade-off problems in damaged corals that employ transverse division as part of reproduction.
The skeletal growth rate for the anthocyathus of Truncatoflabellum spheniscus was similar to that for other azooxanthellate scleractinians and medium- to larger-sized individuals of Flabellum alabastrum (Family Flabellidae)41,42,43,44,45. Conversely, the growth rate for the anthocaulus was similar to those for the smallest individuals of F. alabastrum, and higher than that for other azooxanthellate scleractinians45. In scleractinian corals, growth rates decrease with age28,44,45,46,47. However, after transverse division, the rate of wall growth in anthocauli is higher than it is in anthocyathi over the same period of time (Fig. 6). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence of restoration of skeletal growth rates in solitary corals. The accelerated growth rates for anthocauli after the division lead to a shortening of the time intervals to the next division. In addition, higher rates of pit-infilling in the basal part of anthocyathi skeletons facilitate rapid tissue repair after division. The rates of wall growth in the anthocauli and pit-infilling in the skeletons of anthocyathi both have a marked influence on the efficiency of tissue repair following transverse division and the survival rates of divided individuals.
The patterns of both upper skeletal formation (i.e., the future anthocyathus after transverse division) and lower skeletal formation (i.e., the future anthocaulus after division) in the anthocaulus of Truncatoflabellum, as well as the skeletal growth rates after transverse division for the anthocaulus and anthocyathus are different. The differences in the modes of skeletal development before and after transverse division play an important part in subsequent regeneration by decreasing the time taken for asexual reproduction and facilitating adaptation to a free-living mode of life. Strict control of the sequence of calcification, decalcification, polyp regeneration during and after transverse division in Truncatoflabellum is therefore necessary to increase the number of clonal individuals efficiently. Therefore, the system of asexual reproduction in solitary corals is considered to have been closely linked to the evolution of modes of skeletal growth.
It is noteworthy that the essential process of the transverse division (i.e., decalcification, polypal damage and rapid repair after division, and skeletal regrowth) of azooxanthellate Truncatoflabellum is almost the same with the transverse division of zooxanthellate fungiid corals, although both groups require different habitat conditions (e.g., depth, light, temperature, and others). Truncatoflabellum has evoloved from an ancestor without transverse division48,49. Moreover, attached coral Rhizotrochus, which is a sister group of Truncatoflabellum, has lost both the free-living mode of life and the ability of transverse division in flabellid evolutionary pathway48,49. Similarly, some fungiid corals independently lost the ability of transverse division associated with decalcification and free-living mode of life (e.g., Cycloseris mokai, C. explanulata, C. explanulata, C. wellsi, Lithophyllon undulatum)15,50. An ability of decalcification are thus independently appeared and lost in each scleractinian clade. Moreover, Fungia fungites does not have specialized cells for skeletal dissolution in the vicinity of dissolving skeletons at the time of transverse division20. In contrast, calicoblastic cells in the epithelium above dissolving skeletons are still metabolically active, and are therefore closely involved in the resorption of skeletons20. This suggests that the decalcification process might result from subtle modifications of calcification process, which is commonly provided with scleractinian corals (e.g., restriction of Ca2+-ATPase, which actively remove protons from the calcifying fluid, in calicoblastic epithelium cells51). Truncatoflabellum evolved from a solitary coral having a free-living mode of life without transverse division48,49. Its anthocyathus is thus adaptive in advance to soft substrates. 330 species of azooxanthellate scleractinian corals, or 22% of all scleractinians, live on deep-water sandy and/or muddy substrates52. Moreover, 65 species of the 330 free-living species experience transverse division52. The free-living mode of life consequently occurs by the division. Therefore, adaptation to the soft substrates is essential to the evolution of asexual reproduction with skeletal decalcification. This might be one of the reasons why asexual reproduction (transverse division in this case) associated with skeletal decalcification evolved frequently in several free-living coral clades.
This study clarified that transverse division occurs in several scleractinian corals through a series of highly efficient procedures. Those findings provide important clues for unravelling why asexual reproduction appeared frequently in azooxanthellate solitary corals, and the extent to which those modes of reproduction has affected the adaptive and evolutionary success of scleractinian corals throughout the Phanerozoic.
Materials and Methods
Six anthocaulus specimens of Truncatoflabellum were collected off Koshiki-jima islands at depths of 50 to 100 m in July 2011. The corals were observed for more than 1200 days in a 1000 L tank containing filtered seawater at a temperature of 17 to 19 °C. The corals were maintained under dark conditions and fed twice a week with frozen copepods. Anthocaulus-stage specimens, which were attached to pebbles and set upon a spherical stage (echinoid test) in order to reconstruct natural conditions as far as possible. Anthocyathus specimens are placed on plastic mesh plates, such that they lay on their flattened sides. The specimens were placed sufficiently apart to prevent their tentacles contacting each other. Details of macro-skeletal features were observed using an optical microscope (SMZ-1500; Nikon, Japan) and a digital microscope (VHX-1000; Keyence, Japan).
Skeletal growth was measured as vertical rate of extension over 1200 days and photographs were taken at monthly or bimonthly intervals under a stereomicroscope (Olympus SZX7) equipped with a digital camera. Photographs were always taken at the same distance and at the same angle. Linear growth were quantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/)53. Images were calibrated using a distinct natural marking. Linear growth rates were normalized to 1 yr. The linear growth rates of six anthocaulus specimens were estimated by the Gulland and Holt method54, and were divided 4 size classes in 4–8 mm in height (N = 18), 8–12 mm (N = 32), 12–16 mm (N = 16), 16–20 mm (N = 5).
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Tokuda, Y. et al. First real-time observation of transverse division in azooxanthellate scleractinian corals. Sci. Rep. 7, 41762; doi: 10.1038/srep41762 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Ezaki, Y. & Yasuhara, Y. Regular and flexible modes of division and hystero‐ontogenetic growth in the Silurian rugose coral Stauria favosa. Palaeontology 47, 1075–1091 (2004).
Sentoku, A. & Ezaki, Y. Regularity in Budding Mode and Resultant Growth Morphology of the Azooxanthellate Colonial ScleractinianCyathelia axillaris: Effective and Adaptive Ways of Utilizing Habitat Resources. Paleontol. Res. 16, 252–259, doi: 10.2517/1342-8144-16.3.252 (2012).
Sentoku, A. & Ezaki, Y. Constraints on the formation of colonies of the extant azooxanthellate scleractinian coral Dendrophyllia arbuscula. Lethaia 45, 62–70, doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.2011.00293.x (2012).
Sentoku, A. & Ezaki, Y. Regularity in budding mode and resultant growth morphology of the azooxanthellate colonial scleractinian Tubastraea coccinea. Coral Reefs 31, 67–74, doi: 10.1007/s00338-011-0808-5 (2012).
Sentoku, A. & Ezaki, Y. Regularity and polarity in budding of the colonial scleractinianDendrophyllia ehrenbergiana: consequences of radio-bilateral symmetry of the scleractinian body plan. Lethaia 45, 586–593, doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.2012.00321.x (2012).
Zibrowius, H. Asexual reproduction by bud-shedding in shallow-water Balanophylla of the tropical Indo-Pacific (Cnidaria: Scleractinia: Dendrophylliidae). Proc. 5th int. Coral Reef Cong. 5, 233–238 (1985).
Cairns, S. D. Asexual reproduction in solitary Scleractinia. Proc. 6th int. Coral Reef Cong. 2, 641–646 (1989).
Yamashiro, H. & Yamazato, K. Studies on the detachment of the discs of the mushroom coralFungia fungites with special reference to hard structural changes. Galaxea 6, 163–175 (1987).
Hoeksema, B. W. Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of mushroom corals (Scleractinia: Fungiidae). Zoologische Verhandelingen Leiden 254, 1–295 (1989).
Stolarski, J. Transverse division in a Miocene scleractinian coral. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 36, 413–426 (1992).
Hoeksema, B. W. Extreme morphological plasticity enables a free mode of life in Favia gravida at Ascension Island (South Atlantic). Marine Biodiversity 42, 289–295, doi: 10.1007/s12526-011-0106-z (2012).
Hoeksema, B. & Gittenberger, A. High densities of mushroom coral fragments at West Halmahera, Indonesia. Coral Reefs 29, 691–691 (2010).
Yamashiro, H. & Yamazato, K. Note on the detachment and post-detachment development of the polystomatous coral Sandalolitha robusta (Scleractinia, Cnidaria). Galaxea 6, 323–329 (1987).
Cairns, S. D. & Kitahara, M. V. An illustrated key to the genera and subgenera of the Recent azooxanthellate Scleractinia (Cnidaria, Anthozoa), with an attached glossary. Zookeys, 1–47, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.227.3612 (2012).
Gittenberger, A., Reijnen, B. T. & Hoeksema, B. W. A molecularly based phylogeny reconstruction of mushroom corals (Scleractinia: Fungiidae) with taxonomic consequences and evolutionary implications for life history traits. contr. zool. 80, 107–132 (2011).
Hoeksema, B. & Waheed, Z. Size-dependent dispersal by Goniopora stokesi corals at Semporna, eastern Sabah, Malaysia. Galaxea, Journal of Coral Reef Studies 13, 9–10 (2011).
Stutchbury, S. An Account of the Mode of Growth of young Corals of the Genus Fungia. Trans. linn. Soc. London 16, 493–498 (1833).
Bourne, G. C. On the Postembryonic Development of Fungia. The scientific transactions of the Royal Dublin Society 5, 205–238 (1893).
Bourne, G. C. The Anatomy of the Madreporarian Coral Fungia. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 27, 293–324 (1887).
Yamashiro, H. & Yamazato, K. Morphological studies of the soft tissues involved in skeletal dissolution in the coralFungia fungites. Coral Reefs 15, 177–180 (1996).
Hoeksema, B. W. Impact of budding on free-living corals at East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Coral Reefs, doi: 10.1007/s00338-004-0402-1 (2004).
Hoeksema, B. W. & Waheed, Z. Onset of autotomy in an attached Cycloseris coral. Galaxea, Journal of Coral Reef Studies 14, 25–26 (2012).
Hoeksema, B. W. & Waheed, Z. Initial phase of autotomy in fragmenting Cycloseris corals at Semporna, eastern Sabah, Malaysia. Coral Reefs 30, 1087–1087 (2011).
Hoeksema, B. & Yeemin, T. Late detachment conceals serial budding by the free-living coral Fungia fungites in the Inner Gulf of Thailand. Coral Reefs 30, 975–975 (2011).
Tokuda, Y. & Ezaki, Y. Asexual reproduction of pliocene solitary scleractinian coral truncatoflabellum: a morphological and biometric study. J. Paleontol. 86, 268–272 (2012).
Colley, S. B., Feingold, J. S., Peña, J. & Glynn, P. W. In Proceedings of the 9th International Coral Reef Symposium, Bali. 373–379.
Hoeksema, B. W. & Wirtz, P. Over 130 years of survival by a small, isolated population of Favia gravida corals at Ascension Island (South Atlantic). Coral Reefs 32, 551, doi: 10.1007/s00338-012-1002-0 (2013).
Yamashiro, H. & Nishihira, M. Experimental study of growth and asexual reproduction in Diaseris distorta (Michelin, 1843), a free-living fungiid coral. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 225, 253–267 (1998).
Cairns, S. A revision of the ahermatypic Scleractinia of the Philippine islands and adjacent waters. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 486, 1–136 (1989).
Stolarski, J. Three-dimensional micro-and nanostructural characteristics of the scleractinian coral skeleton: a biocalcification proxy. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 48, 497–530 (2003).
Bongaerts, P., Hoeksema, B. W., Hay, K. B. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Mushroom corals overcome live burial through pulsed inflation. Coral Reefs 31, 399 (2012).
Hoeksema, B. W. & Bongaerts, P. Mobility and self-righting by a free-living mushroom coral through pulsed inflation. Marine Biodiversity 36, 521–524 (2016).
Hoeksema, B. W. & Waheed, Z. It pays to have a big mouth: mushroom corals ingesting salps at northwest Borneo. Marine Biodiversity 42, 297–302 (2012).
Kramarsky-Winter, E. & Loya, Y. Tissue regeneration in the coral Fungia granulosa: the effect of extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Mar. Biol. 137, 867–873 (2000).
Work, T. M. & Aeby, G. S. Wound repair in Montipora capitata. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 105, 116–119, doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2010.05.009 (2010).
Passamaneck, Y. J. & Martindale, M. Q. Cell proliferation is necessary for the regeneration of oral structures in the anthozoan cnidarian Nematostella vectensis. BMC Dev. Biol. 12, 1 (2012).
Muscatine, L., Tambutte, E. & Allemand, D. Morphology of coral desmocytes, cells that anchor the calicoblastic epithelium to the skeleton. Coral Reefs 16, 205–213 (1997).
Stolarski, J. et al. The ancient evolutionary origins of Scleractinia revealed by azooxanthellate corals. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 316, doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-316 (2011).
Kojis, B. L. & Quinn, N. J. Aspects of sexual reproduction and larval development in the shallow water hermatypic coral, Goniastrea australensis (Edwards and Haime, 1857). Bull. Mar. Sci. 31, 558–573 (1981).
Veghel, M. v. & Bak, R. Reproductive characteristics of the polymorphic Caribbean reef building coral, Montastrea annularis. III. Reproduction in damaged and regenerating colonies. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 109, 229–233 (1994).
Adkins, J. F., Henderson, G. M., Wang, S. L., O’Shea, S. & Mokadem, F. Growth rates of the deep-sea scleractinia Desmophyllum cristagalli and Enallopsammia rostrata. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 227, 481–490, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.08.022 (2004).
Brahmi, C. et al. Skeletal growth, ultrastructure and composition of the azooxanthellate scleractinian coral Balanophyllia regia. Coral Reefs 29, 175–189 (2010).
Fowler, S. & Laffoley, D. Stability in Mediterranean-Atlantic sessile epifaunal communities at the northern limits of their range. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 172, 109–127 (1993).
Goffredo, S., Mattioli, G. & Zaccanti, F. Growth and population dynamics model of the Mediterranean solitary coral Balanophyllia europaea (Scleractinia, Dendrophylliidae). Coral Reefs 23, 433–443, doi: 10.1007/s00338-004-0395-9 (2004).
Hamel, J. F., Sun, Z. & Mercier, A. Influence of size and seasonal factors on the growth of the deep-sea coral Flabellum alabastrum in mesocosm. Coral Reefs 29, 521–525, doi: 10.1007/s00338-010-0590-9 (2010).
Bablet, J. Report on the growth of a scleractinia (Fungia paumotensis). Proc. 5th int. Coral Reef Cong. 4, 361–365 (1985).
Chadwick-Furman, N. E., Goffredo, S. & Loya, Y. Growth and population dynamic model of the reef coral Fungia granulosa Klunzinger, 1879 at Eilat, northern Red Sea. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 249, 199–218 (2000).
Tokuda, Y., Ikeno, T., Goto, S. G., Numata, H. & Ezaki, Y. Influence of different substrates on the evolution of morphology and life‐history traits of azooxanthellate solitary corals (Scleractinia: Flabellidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 101, 184–192 (2010).
Tokuda, Y. & Ezaki, Y. Attachment structures inRhizotrochus(Scleractinia): macro- to microscopic traits and their evolutionary significance. Lethaia 46, 232–244, doi: 10.1111/let.12013 (2013).
Benzoni, F. et al. Phylogenetic position and taxonomy of Cycloseris explanulata and C. wellsi (Scleractinia: Fungiidae): lost mushroom corals find their way home. contr. zool. 81, 125–146 (2012).
Zoccola, D. et al. Molecular cloning and localization of a PMCA P-type calcium ATPase from the coral Stylophora pistillata. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1663, 117–126, doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.02.010 (2004).
Cairns, S. D. Deep-water corals: an overview with special reference to diversity and distribution of deep-water scleractinian corals. Bull. Mar. Sci. 81, 311–322 (2007).
Rasband, W. S. ImageJ, US National Institutes of HealthBethesda, Maryland, USA, 1997–2016.
Gulland, J. & Holt, S. Estimation of growth parameters for data at unequal time intervals. Journal du Conseil 25, 47–49 (1959).
Acknowledgements
We specially thank N. Mihara and T. Wada for their advice and help in maintenance of the corals. We acknowledge T. Miyanaga and Tottori Prefectural Farming Fisheries Center for providing us with salty groundwater. This work was supported by Tottori University of Environmental Studies Grant-in-Aid for Special Research. This research was also supported by grants from the Scientific Research Fund of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21340154, 22654062, 26400503, 15H03744, 16K13898).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.T. designed and Y.T. and H.H. performed all the experiments, Y.T., H.H. and Y.E. analysed the results and wrote the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Tokuda, Y., Haraguchi, H. & Ezaki, Y. First real-time observation of transverse division in azooxanthellate scleractinian corals. Sci Rep 7, 41762 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41762
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41762
This article is cited by
-
Dimorphic life cycle through transverse division in burrowing hard coral Deltocyathoides orientalis
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
First record and range extension of the transversely-dividing azooxanthellate coral Truncatoflabellum mortenseni Cairns and Zibrowius, 1997 (Scleractinia, Flabellidae) in the Persian Gulf, Western Indo-Pacific Ocean
Marine Biodiversity Records (2021)
-
Polyp dropout in a solitary cold-water coral
Coral Reefs (2021)
-
First records of the genus Sphenopus from temperate waters and lower mesophotic depths
Marine Biodiversity (2020)
-
Wave-swept coralliths of Saba Bank, Dutch Caribbean
Marine Biodiversity (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.