Article | Open | Published:

Rapid identification of nine species of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms by pyrosequencing

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 37228 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

The identification of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidea) that infect humans and intermediate/paratenic hosts is extremely difficult due to their morphological similarities, particularly in the case of Diphyllobothrium and Spirometra species. A pyrosequencing method for the molecular identification of pathogenic agents has recently been developed, but as of yet there have been no reports of pyrosequencing approaches that are able to discriminate among diphyllobothriidean species. This study, therefore, set out to establish a pyrosequencing method for differentiating among nine diphyllobothriidean species, Diphyllobothrium dendriticum, Diphyllobothrium ditremum, Diphyllobothrium latum, Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense, Diphyllobothrium stemmacephalum, Diplogonoporus balaenopterae, Adenocephalus pacificus, Spirometra decipiens and Sparganum proliferum, based on the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene as a molecular marker. A region of 41 nucleotides in the cox1 gene served as a target, and variations in this region were used for identification using PCR plus pyrosequencing. This region contains nucleotide variations at 12 positions, which is enough for the identification of the selected nine species of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms. This method was found to be a reliable tool not only for species identification of diphyllobothriids, but also for epidemiological studies of cestodiasis caused by diphyllobothriidean tapeworms at public health units in endemic areas.

Introduction

The order Diphyllobothriidea (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda) is a large group of tapeworms that parasitize mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles1,2. The order also comprises several important genera of human parasites, such as Diphyllobothrium, Adenocephalus, Diplogonoporus and Spirometra3,4,5,6. Diphyllobothriasis is a zoonosis of which adult-stage tapeworms of the genus Diphyllobothrium, specifically Diphyllobothrium latum and D. nihonkaiense, are the most frequent etiologic agents in humans3,4,7,8. Diphyllobothrium dendriticum6, Adenocephalus pacificus (syn. Diphyllobothrium pacificum6), and Diphyllobothrium stemmacephalum9 have rarely been detected in humans. The life cycle of the Diphyllobothrium tapeworm consists of intermediate hosts (copepods and fish) and definitive hosts (e.g., marine mammals, carnivores, humans and piscivorous birds). Once the eggs hatch in water, the ciliated coracidia are ingested by copepods and develop into procercoid larvae. When infected copepods are engulfed by a second intermediate host, the procercoid larva migrates to the musculature and the body cavity (mainly stomach, liver and other organs) and develops into a plerocercoid larva4. Humans become infected by eating raw or undercooked fish containing plerocercoids, which subsequently develop into adult tapeworms in the human intestine4. Symptoms of diphyllobothriasis include diarrhoea, loose bowels and light abdominal pain or discomfort. Most of the cases are asymptomatic. Heavy infections may cause intestinal obstruction, and motile proglottids can result in cholecystitis or cholangitis. Prolonged or severe D. latum infection can cause megaloblastic anaemia4,6.

Human diplogonoporiasis refers to a tapeworm infection caused by Diplogonoporus balaenopterae (syn. Diplogonoporus grandis10), which usually infects minke whale, sei whale and hump back whale11 and has been found almost exclusively in Japan10,12,13. The details of its life cycle are not clear, but various marine fish, such as raw whitebait, are suspected as potential sources of human infection14,15. Human sparganosis is a harmful infective zoonosis caused by plerocercoid larvae (e.g., sparganum) belonging to the genus Spirometra or Sparganum. Sparganosis is classified into two forms, nonproliferative and proliferative. The former is caused by Spirometra erinaceieuropaei and Spirometra decipiens in China16, Japan17, Korea18,19, Taiwan20 and Thailand21 and Spirometra mansonoides in the USA22. The latter is caused by the more pathogenic and disseminating Sparganum proliferum, which is reported as occurring only sporadically in Japan23, Taiwan24 and Thailand25 and very rarely in Paraguay, Venezuela, and the USA26,27. Spirometra species require two intermediate hosts for the completion of their life cycle. Copepods serve as the first intermediate host for the procercoid larvae. Vertebrates (reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals) serve as the second intermediate and paratenic hosts for the plerocercoid larvae. Human infection occurs through the ingestion of water polluted with copepods carrying procercoids or through ingesting raw or undercooked meat such as frog, snake or chicken infected with plerocercoids21,28. The plerocercoid migrates predominantly to subcutaneous tissue, but it also affects the brain and eyes. Sparganum of Spirometra species can rarely develop into adult worms in the human intestine29. The details of the Sp. proliferum life cycle are not clear and its adult stage is unknown.

Since the eggs, larvae and adult tapeworms of the genera Diphyllobothrium, Adenocephalus and Spirometra are morphologically similar, their identification in human tissues is exceedingly difficult and requires special expertise. Only one study has successfully used morphometric and ultrastructural (surface morphology) egg features to distinguish among the 8 species of diphyllobothriids30. For these reasons, many molecular methods using different genetic markers have been developed for the identification of diphyllobothriid tapeworms: cox1 for Diphyllobothrium31,32,33,34 and S. erinaceieuropaei16,35, sdhB for Sp. proliferum and S. erinaceieuropaei36, and nad3 for Sp. proliferum5. These molecular methods are reliable and valuable tools for the identification of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms. Pyrosequencing is a DNA sequencing method that utilizes enzyme-coupled reactions and bioluminescence to monitor the pyrophosphate (PPi) release accompanying nucleotide incorporation using the synthesis of short nucleotide fragments that are directed by the sequence in real-time37. The method is principled on the real-time monitoring of 4 enzymes during DNA synthesis by luminescence using a step that results in a detectable light signal upon nucleotide incorporation. The detection is based on the PPi released when a nucleotide is incorporated into the DNA strand. The signal can be measured according to the number of bases added. This method can be used for mutation detection and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping of large samples of screening material and high-throughput DNA analysis techniques38. The method, an alternative method, has been used for species-specific discrimination of Entamoeba species39 and for identification of various parasite taxa such as Plasmodium40, Trichinella species41, Paragonimus42 and lymphatic filaria43. Here we developed a pyrosequencing methodology that characterizes cox1 gene amplicons for the identification of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms in humans and intermediate hosts.

Results

Based on sequence alignments of the cox1 gene from the nine diphyllobothriid species shown in Table 1, the 41 nucleotides following the 3′ end of the sequencing primer presented high accuracy and were used as the target region for species identification (Fig. 1 and Table 2). The nucleotide sequence pattern in the target region of each diphyllobothriidean species is shown as pyrogram results (Fig. 2). Of the 41 nucleotides, 12 positions were sufficiently variable to discriminate among the diphyllobothriidean species (Tables 2 and 3). Diphyllobothrium dendriticum and A. pacificus were found to show intra-specific variation (Table 2). The pyrosequencing reproducibility was confirmed for the amplicons by Sanger sequencing conducted at First BASE Laboratories Sdn Bhd (Selangor, Malaysia) using the BigDye terminator v3.1 cycle-sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems (ABI), Carlsbad, CA), and both strands were directly sequenced using the PCR primers as sequencing primers (Model 310 or 3100, ABI), which yielded identical sequence data. No PCR products could be obtained from DNA samples of other parasites, human leukocytes or uninfected fish, proving the high specificity of the PCR primers.

Table 1: Diphyllobothriid samples tested by pyrosequencing.
Figure 1: Multiple sequence alignments for indicating primer annealing positions and diagnostic target region.
Figure 1

Nucleotide alignment of the mitochondrial cox1 gene derived from D. dendriticum, D. ditremum, D. latum, D. nihonkaiense, D. stemmacephalum, Di. balaenopterae, A. pacificus, S. decipiens and Sp. proliferum. The solid arrows indicate the position of Psedo_F (forward primer) and biotinylated Psedo_R (reverse primer). The broken arrow indicates Psedo_S (sequencing primer). The boxed region shows the position (881–921) of the target area used for species-level identification. Dots indicate identical nucleotides between sequences. AM712906 (D. latum) is the reference sequence for nucleotides positions.

Table 2: Variable cox1 nucleotide positions used for the differentiation of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms.
Figure 2: Theoretical pyrograms and pyrograms of control plasmids or analytical sample raw reads of 9 diphyllobothriid species.
Figure 2

Pyrograms of the 41-base fragment of the cox1 gene from D. dendriticum (A) D. ditremum (B) D. latum (C) D. nihonkaiense (D) D. stemmacephalum (E) Di. balaenopterae (F) A. pacificus (G) S. decipiens (H) and Sp. proliferum (I). Theoretical pyrogram patterns (top of each panel) and representative raw data of control plasmids or analytical samples from pyrosequencing (bottom of each panel) are shown. The actual sequence obtained by pyrosequencing is displayed below the panels following “Seq”. The Y-axis shows the level of fluorescence emitted by the incorporation of a nucleotide base, and the X-axis shows total number of bases added at that point in time; G, C, T, A, nucleotide bases. The underlined letters indicate the nucleotides used for identification of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms.

Table 3: The nucleotide patterns used to differentiate diphyllobothriidean tapeworms by the pyrosequencing technique.

Discussion

The taxonomy of the diphyllobothriidean tapeworms generally depends on morphological classification, but morphological characteristics are not always decisive criteria, particularly in larval and immature worms, or inadequately preserved specimens. Diphyllobothrium dendriticum, D. latum, D. nihonkaiense, A. pacificus and Spirometra species are of medical importance and have caused an emerging public health problem, especially in countries in which fish consumption is expanding and new cooking habits involving raw or uncooked processing are gaining ground6,33,44. For the differential detection of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms in diagnostic laboratories, rapid, specific and cost-effective tools for routine diagnosis of parasites have been developed6,8,33. Molecular methods for differentiation among diphyllobothriideans are important in situations in which the morphology and epidemiological information are similar6,34,45,46. Many molecular methods have been developed for the identification of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms, for example, multiplex PCR for D. latum, D. dendriticum, D. nihonkaiense, and A. pacificus33, PCR for study of the taxonomic relationship between Di. balaenopterae and Di. grandis10, and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism for Diphyllobothrium and Diplogonoporus species8. However, the limitation with these methods is that analyzing the results requires gel electrophoresis, which is imprecise, has restricted throughput and can only be used to differentiate up to eight species30. Moreover, the differentiation among D. ditremum, Di. balaenopterae, S. decipiens and Sp. proliferum has not been evaluated. This prompted us to seek out a new tool for elucidation, namely pyrosequencing47.

The pyrosequencing operating system is divided into two modes, sequence analysis (SQA) and SNP. These are obtainable for handling, and each mode can detect sequenced nucleotides in a different manner. The SQA mode sequences short and medium- length DNA fragments (approximate size of 25–50 bp)48, whereas the SNP mode searches only for single base variations. Pyrosequencing has been used in various applications such as differentiation of Rickettsia species in hard tick samples49 and detection of benzimidazole-resistance- associated β-tubulin SNPs in cattle nematodes50. It is also suitable for identifying, screening and/or predicting resistant strains of bacteria for antibiotic drugs51. Here, we report on a new tool for rapid identification of nine diphyllobothriidean tapeworms using pyrosequencing. This method can identify D. dendriticum, D. ditremum, D. latum, D. nihonkaiense, D. stemmacephalum, Di. balaenopterae, A. pacificus, S. decipiens and Sp. proliferum (Table 1) at the species level. As another advantage of pyrosequencing, short PCR products are sufficient for this analysis. Thus, DNA from formalin-fixed samples that has degraded due to formalin fixation is suitable for pyrosequencing. In this study, we found that pyrosequencing was able to identify formalin-fixed A. pacificus (Fig. 2G).

The pyrosequencing technique developed in this study is a high-throughput tool that can be completed within 4 hours (excluding the DNA extraction period) and can achieve results from 96 samples simultaneously. The approximate estimated cost is $5 per test. However, the cost can vary depending upon the commercial origin of there agents used. In addition to its medical applications, this pyrosequencing technique can be useful for identification of larvae isolated from copepods, eggs, and adults among different taxa that share similar morphology. Pyrosequencing is a promising alternative high-throughput method for molecular genotyping of nine species of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms and can have important implications for epidemiological studies. This not only applies to endemic countries but also non-endemic areas in which travellers coming from endemic areas bring in the parasites5,52.

Materials and Methods

Parasite materials

Specimens of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms (larval and adult stages) were collected from intermediate and definitive hosts from different geographical localities (Table 1). A total of 29 diphyllobothriidean tapeworm specimens, including D. dendriticum, D. ditremum, D. latum, D. nihonkaiense, D. stemmacephalum, Di. balaenopterae, A. pacificus, S. decipiens and Sp. proliferum were examined (Table 1). The diphyllobothriid specimens examined in this study were fixed in 70% ethanol, with the exception of A. pacificus, which was fixed in 10% formalin.

Genomic DNA samples from non-diphyllobothriid parasites were used for the evaluation of primer specificity. These included samples from trematodes (Opisthorchis viverrini, Clonorchis sinensis, Fasciola gigantica, Paragonimus heterotremus, Schistosoma japonicum, Schistosoma mekongi, Haplorchis taichui, Stellantchasmus sp., Centrocestus sp., Echinostoma malayanum, intestinal lecithodendriid flukes), nematodes (Trichuris trichiura, hookworms, Strongyloides stercoralis, Ascaris lumbricoides, Capillaria philippinensis, Trichostrongylus sp.) and protozoa (Isospora belli, Giardia duodenalis). DNA samples from uninfected fish and human leukocytes were also analyzed.

Ethical Approval

All methods in the study protocol were approved and were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of the ethical approval in the Ethics Committee in the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan (No. 177). No experiment involving human subjects was used. All parasites were derived from left over specimens (informed consent was obtained from all subjects and the data were analyzed anonymously) or from specimens bought at markets. We confirmed that the process did not involve endangered or protected species.

Primer design

Primer design was based on nucleotide alignment of cox1 from D. dendriticum, D. ditremum, D. latum, D. nihonkaiense, D. stemmacephalum, Di. balaenopterae, A. pacificus (syn. D. pacificum); and S. decipiens, and Sp. proliferum (see Table 2 for GenBank accession nos.) The following primers were designed from A. pacificus sequence (GenBank accession no. AB548654): our primer sets (Psedo_F; 5′-TTTGGGTAGTGTTGTGTGGG-3′, corresponding to positions 846–865 and biotinylated Psedo_R; biotin-5′-GGCTCACGTAAAGAAACACGACT-3′, corresponding to positions 1010-988) and Psedo_S sequencing primer (5′-GGGGTCATCATATGTTTA-3′, corresponding to positions 863–880) were designed using PyroMark Q96ID software version 2.0 (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden) (Fig. 1). Diphyllobothrium latum (GenBank accession no. AM712906) is the reference sequence that was used to determine the nucleotide positions.

DNA extraction, plasmid preparation, DNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and pyrosequencing

Genomic DNA samples from 29 diphyllobothriid specimens (Table 1) were extracted using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). In addition, positive control plasmids for all diphyllobothriidean species were produced by ligation of each species-specific amplicon into a pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, WI), as has been described previously in other reports53. Each inserted gene was Sanger sequenced in both directions and the resulting sequences were identical to the gene sequences from which the primers were designed.

The cox1 gene fragments (165 bp) were PCR amplified from the diphyllobothriidean DNA. The total PCR reaction volume was 25 μl and included 2 μl of the DNA template, 2.5 μl of 10× PCR buffer (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany), 0.2 mM of dNTP, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 μM of Psedo_F primer, 0.2 μM of biotinylated Psedo_R primer and 0.625 U of FastStart High Fidelity Enzyme Blend (Roche Applied Science). PCR was performed at 94 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 sec, annealing at 48 °C for 30 sec, and extension at 72 °C for 30 sec, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were visualized using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. After PCR amplification, biotinylated PCR products were added into 96-well plates and processed as described elsewhere40,42. The pyrosequencing system included DNA polymerase I, ATP sulfurylase, luciferase and apyrase. Pyrosequencing is a DNA sequencing technique that is based on the detection of released PPi during DNA synthesis. In a cascade of enzymatic reactions, visible light is generated that is proportional to the number of incorporated nucleotides. The cascade starts with a nucleic acid polymerization reaction in which inorganic PPi is released as a result of nucleotide incorporation by polymerase. The released PPi is subsequently converted to ATP by ATP sulfurylase, which provides the energy to luciferase to oxidize luciferin and generate light. Because the added nucleotide is known, the sequence of the template can be determined. Light is only generated when a newly added nucleotide is complementary to the next unpaired base in the template strand. The intensity of light is proportional to the number of sequential identical bases in a homopolymer, but determining the exact length of a homopolymer can be a problem for this technique37,53. In cases which the target sequence showed up to four homopolymers, the readout was analyzed manually to ensure accuracy.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Thanchomnang, T. et al. Rapid identification of nine species of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms by pyrosequencing. Sci. Rep. 6, 37228; doi: 10.1038/srep37228 (2016).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    In CRC handbook of tapeworm identification (CRC Press Inc, 1986).

  2. 2.

    , & Order Pseudophyllidea Carus, 1863 in Keys to the Cestode Parasites of Vertebrates (eds & ) 205–247 (CAB International, 1994).

  3. 3.

    , & Fish-borne parasitic zoonoses: status and issues. Int J Parasitol 35, 1233–1254 (2005).

  4. 4.

    , , & Update on the human broad tapeworm (genus Diphyllobothrium), including clinical relevance. Clin Microbiol Rev 22, 146–160 (2009).

  5. 5.

    et al. Travel-acquired subcutaneous Sparganum proliferum infection diagnosed by molecular methods. Br J Dermatol 170, 741–743 (2014).

  6. 6.

    , , & Diphyllobothrium, Diplogonoporus, and Spirometra in Biology of Foodborne Parasites (eds , & ) 299–326 (CRC Press Taylor & Francis group, 2015).

  7. 7.

    , & Diphyllobothriasis: update on human cases, foci, patterns and sources of human infections and future considerations. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 32, 59–76 (2001).

  8. 8.

    , , & A simple method for identifying the diphyllobothriids based on mitochondrial DNA analysis in Parasitological Research: Materials and Methods (ed. ) 47–49 (Sankeisha, 2014).

  9. 9.

    et al. First confirmed human case of Diphyllobothrium stemmacephalum infection and molecular verification of the synonymy of Diphyllobothrium yonagoense with D. stemmacephalum (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidea). Parasitol Int 65, 412–442 (2016).

  10. 10.

    , & Complete mitochondrial genomes of Diplogonoporus balaenopterae and Diplogonoporus grandis (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae) and clarification of their taxonomic relationships. Parasitol Int 61, 260–266 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Guide to identification of diphyllobothriid cestodes (ed. ) 1–146 (Gendaikikaku, 1999). (In Japanese).

  12. 12.

    Cestodes in Progress of Medical Parasitology in Japan. Vol. 8 (eds , & ) 235–243 (Meguro Parasitological Museum Press, 2003).

  13. 13.

    et al. Diplogonoporiasis in Japan: genetic analyses of five clinical isolates. Parasitol Int 57, 212–216 (2008).

  14. 14.

    , , , & A mass occurrence of human infection with Diplogonoporus grandis (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae) in Shizuoka Prefecture, central Japan. Parasitol Int 51, 73–79 (2002).

  15. 15.

    et al. A case of cestode infection caused by Diplogonoporus balaenopterae most likely due to the consumption of raw whitebait. Dokkyo J Med Scis 40, 189–192 (2013). (In Japanese).

  16. 16.

    et al. Sequence variability in three mitochondrial DNA regions of Spirometra erinaceieuropaei spargana of human and animal health significance. J Helminthol 86, 271–275 (2012).

  17. 17.

    , , , & Sparganosis cases reported in Japan in the recent decade, 2000–2009. Clin Parasitol 21, 33–36 (2010). (In Japanese).

  18. 18.

    et al. Human infections with Spirometra decipiens plerocercoids identified by morphologic and genetic analyses in Korea. Korean J Parasitol 53, 299–305 (2015).

  19. 19.

    et al. Mitochondrial genome sequences of Spirometra erinaceieuropaei and S. decipiens (Cestoidea: Diphyllobothriidae). Korean J Parasitol 53, 455–463 (2015).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Survey of Spirometra erinaceieuropaei in frogs in Taiwan and its experimental infection in cats. J Helminthol 74, 173–176 (2000).

  21. 21.

    , & Human sparganosis in Thailand: an overview. Acta Trop 118, 171–176 (2011).

  22. 22.

    , , & In Feline Clinical Parasitology (Wiley-Blackwell, 2002).

  23. 23.

    , , , & Human proliferative sparganosis. A new Japanese case. Am J Clin Pathol 94, 224–228 (1990).

  24. 24.

    et al. Spinal cord proliferative sparganosis in Taiwan: a case report. Neurosurgery 21, 235–238 (1987).

  25. 25.

    , , & Intraosseous proliferative sparganosis presenting as a pathological fracture a case report and review of the literature. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 46, 558–563 (2015).

  26. 26.

    et al. Disseminated infection caused by Sparganum proliferum in an AIDS patient. Histopathology 56, 824–828 (2010).

  27. 27.

    et al. Case report: molecular diagnosis of subcutaneous Spirometra erinaceieuropaei sparganosis in a Japanese immigrant. Am J Trop Med Hyg 88, 198–202 (2013).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Human sparganosis, a neglected food borne zoonosis. Lancet Infect Dis 15, 1226–1235 (2015).

  29. 29.

    et al. Two cases of Spirometra erinacei infection and one of sparganosis mansoni in three people who ate the same snake (Elaphe quadrivirgata). Clin Parasitol 13, 159–163 (2003). (In Japanese).

  30. 30.

    , , & Eggs as a suitable tool for species diagnosis of causative agents of human diphyllobothriosis (Cestoda). PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10, e0004721 (2016).

  31. 31.

    , , & Imported diphyllobothriasis in Switzerland: molecular evidence of Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (Nitsch, 1824). Parasitol Res 102, 201–204 (2008).

  32. 32.

    , , & First record of human infection with the tapeworm Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense in North America. Am J Trop Med Hyg 78, 235–238 (2008).

  33. 33.

    et al. Multiplex PCR for differential identification of broad tapeworms (Cestoda: Diphyllobothrium) infecting humans. J Clin Microbiol 48, 3111–3116 (2010).

  34. 34.

    et al. Molecular identification of the Diphyllobothrium species causing diphyllobothriasis in Chilean patients. Parasitol Res 106, 995–1000 (2010).

  35. 35.

    et al. Sparganosis presenting as cauda equina syndrome with molecular identification of the parasite in tissue sections. Korean J Parasitol 51, 739–742 (2013).

  36. 36.

    et al. Phylogenetic identification of Sparganum proliferum as a pseudophyllidean cestode by the sequence analyses on mitochondrial COI and nuclear sdhB genes. Parasitol Int 50, 93–104 (2001).

  37. 37.

    Pyrosequencing sheds light on DNA sequencing. Genome Res 11, 3–11 (2001).

  38. 38.

    , & Pyrosequencing: history, biochemistry and future. Clin Chim Acta 363, 83–94 (2006).

  39. 39.

    et al. Identification and delineation of members of the Entamoeba complex by pyrosequencing. Mol Cell Probes 24, 403–406 (2010).

  40. 40.

    et al. Molecular markers for detection and differentiation of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in human blood samples by pyrosequencing. J Clin Microbiol 50, 1455–1457 (2012).

  41. 41.

    et al. Molecular differentiation of Trichinella spiralis, T. pseudospiralis, T. papuae and T. zimbabwensis by pyrosequencing. J Helminthol 89, 118–123 (2013).

  42. 42.

    et al. Molecular identification of Paragonimus species by DNA pyrosequencing technology. Parasitol Int 62, 341–345 (2013).

  43. 43.

    et al. Pyrosequencing using SL and 5SrRNA as molecular markers for identifying zoonotic filarial nematodes in blood samples and mosquitoes. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 16, 326–333 (2016).

  44. 44.

    et al. Inter-and intra-specific characterization of tapeworms of the genus Diphyllobothrium (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidea) from Switzerland, using nuclear and mitochondrial DNA targets. Parasitol Int 59, 35–39 (2010).

  45. 45.

    et al. Molecular evidence of Spirometra erinaceieuropaei infection in snakes Ptyas korros from Lao PDR and Thailand and frogs Hoplobatrachus rugulosus from Myanmar. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 45, 1271–1278 (2014).

  46. 46.

    et al. Molecular detection of Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense in humans, China. Emerg Infect Dis 20, 315–318 (2014).

  47. 47.

    & The evolution of pyrosequencing® for microbiology: From genes to genomes. J Microbiol Methods 86, 1–7 (2011).

  48. 48.

    et al. Development of a PCR assay and pyrosequencing for identification of important human fish-borne trematodes and its potential use for detection in fecal specimens. Parasit Vectors 7, 88 (2014).

  49. 49.

    & Prevalence of Rickettsiales (Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp.) in hard ticks (Ixodes ricinus) in the city of Hamburg, Germany. Parasitol Res 113, 2169–2175 (2014).

  50. 50.

    , , , & Absence of detectable benzimidazole-resistance associated alleles in Haemonchus placei in cattle in Nigeria revealed by pyrosequencing of β-tubulin isotype 1. Parasitol Res 114, 1997–2001 (2015).

  51. 51.

    et al. Pyrosequencing for rapid detection of tuberculosis resistance in clinical isolates and sputum samples from re-treatment pulmonary tuberculosis patients. BMC Infect Dis 14, 200 (2014).

  52. 52.

    , , & Imported diphyllobothriasis in Switzerland: molecular methods to define a clinical case of Diphyllobothrium infection as Diphyllobothrium dendriticum, August 2010. Euro Surveill 18, pii:20355 (2013).

  53. 53.

    et al. Rapid molecular identification of human taeniid cestodes by pyrosequencing approach. PLoS One 9, e100611 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Drs. Toshiaki Kuramochi (Japan), Naoki Arizono (Japan), Ruben Mercdo (Chile), and Roman Kuchta (Czech Republic) for providing specimens of Sp. proliferum and Di. balaenopterae, D. ditremum, A. pacificus and D. latum, and D. dendriticum from the USA, respectively. This study was supported by a TRF Senior Research Scholar Grant, Thailand Research Fund grant number RTA5880001; the Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand, through the Health Cluster (SHeP-GMS). O.S. was supported by Scholarship under the Post-Doctoral Training Program from Research Affairs and Graduate School, Khon Kaen University (58101). This work was also supported in part by Grants-in Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (H25-Shinko-Ippan-014) and Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Kansensho Jitsuyouka-Ippan, 15fk0108025h0502) to H.Y.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, 44000, Thailand

    • Tongjit Thanchomnang
    • , Oranuch Sanpool
    •  & Somjintana Tourtip
  2. Research and Diagnostic Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand

    • Tongjit Thanchomnang
    • , Chairat Tantrawatpan
    • , Pewpan M. Intapan
    • , Oranuch Sanpool
    • , Viraphong Lulitanond
    •  & Wanchai Maleewong
  3. Division of Cell Biology, Department of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Rangsit Campus, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand

    • Chairat Tantrawatpan
  4. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand

    • Pewpan M. Intapan
    • , Oranuch Sanpool
    •  & Wanchai Maleewong
  5. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand

    • Viraphong Lulitanond
  6. Department of Parasitology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan

    • Hiroshi Yamasaki

Authors

  1. Search for Tongjit Thanchomnang in:

  2. Search for Chairat Tantrawatpan in:

  3. Search for Pewpan M. Intapan in:

  4. Search for Oranuch Sanpool in:

  5. Search for Viraphong Lulitanond in:

  6. Search for Somjintana Tourtip in:

  7. Search for Hiroshi Yamasaki in:

  8. Search for Wanchai Maleewong in:

Contributions

T.T., P.M.I., H.Y. and W.M. conceived and designed the experiments; C.T., O.S. and S.T. performed the experiments; T.T., V.L. and W.M. analyzed the data; P.M.I., H.Y. and W.M. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; T.T., H.Y. and W.M. wrote the paper and reviewed the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanchai Maleewong.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37228

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.