Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Erratum: Image Quality Ranking Method for Microscopy

The Original Article was published on 01 July 2016

Scientific Reports 6: Article number: 28962; published online: 01 July 2016; updated: 19 August 2016.

In this Article, the PyImageQualityRanking software source code has been omitted from the Methods section under subheading ‘Image Quality Ranking Software’. It should read:

“The PyImageQualityRanking software’s source code can be downloaded from https://bitbucket.org/sakoho81/pyimagequalityranking/. The software is distributed as a standard Python package, which contains an automatic setup script for easy installation. A convenient command line interface is provided for controlling various measures. For further details, please refer to the software documentation at https://bitbucket.org/sakoho81/pyimagequalityranking/wiki/Home.”

Authors

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/srep28962

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koho, S., Fazeli, E., Eriksson, J. et al. Erratum: Image Quality Ranking Method for Microscopy. Sci Rep 6, 30863 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30863

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing