Article | Open | Published:

A new symmetrodont mammal (Trechnotheria: Zhangheotheriidae) from the Early Cretaceous of China and trechnotherian character evolution

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 26668 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

We report the discovery of Anebodon luoi, a new genus and species of zhangheotheriid symmetrodont mammal from the Lujiatun site of the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation, China. The fossil is represented by an associated partial skull and dentaries with a nearly complete dentition, and with a dental formula of I4/3 C1/1 P5/4 M3/4. This new taxon lacks the high molar count typical of derived symmetrodonts, differing from the well-represented zhangheotheriids Zhangheotherium and Maotherium in having a postcanine dental formula that resembles more primitive tinodontid symmetrodonts on the one hand, and sister taxa to therians such as Peramus on the other. Upper and lower distal premolars are strongly molariform and are captured undergoing replacement, clarifying positional homology among related taxa. We also describe the rostrum and, for the first time in a symmetrodont, much of the orbital mosaic. Importantly, our new taxon occupies a basal position within the Zhangheotheriidae and permits discussion of trechnotherian character evolution, ultimately shedding additional light on the evolution of therians.

Introduction

Mesozoic mammals with molariform teeth bearing a simple, triangular arrangement of principal cusps were traditionally assigned to the Order Symmetrodonta1. Based originally on taxa from the Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous Morrison and Purbeck formations (e.g., Spalacotherium2 and Tinodon3), this classification stood for well over a half century and incorporated subsequently described forms ranging from Kuehneotherium (Early Jurassic of Britain4) to the pseudotribosphenic Shuotherium (Middle Jurassic of China and Britain5,6,7,8). Phylogenetic analyses imply that this grouping is artificial, with the symmetrodont molar pattern representing a structural grade that evolved multiple times9,10,11. In fact, weakly-triangulated molariforms, as represented by tinodontids, are present near the base of Mammalia in recent analyses12,13,14, suggesting that this pattern was shared by the ancestors of dentally specialised but structurally disparate groups such as eutriconodontans, multituberculates, dryolestoids, and therians. Classic studies of molar evolution have proposed homologies of cusps between therians (the group containing marsupials and placentals) and non-therians15,16,17, and there has been broad agreement when it comes to transformations from a symmetrodont pattern (though notable exceptions include the fate of upper molar cusp C with regards to the metacone, and the homology of the distal lower molar cusp d with the cusps of the therian talonid); see recent review by Davis18. Therefore, discoveries of well-preserved symmetrodont specimens have the potential to illuminate the morphological transitions that gave rise to therians.

Symmetrodont taxa with acutely-triangulated molar cusps (“acute-angled symmetrodonts”) form a monophyletic group in recent analyses19,20,21, positioned at the base of the Trechnotheria, a clade which also contains dryolestoids and therians. These symmetrodonts are known principally from the Early Cretaceous and became extinct prior to the Campanian22. They segregate into two lineages: the Spalacotheriidae, a diverse group which contain some dentally specialised taxa bearing a high number of mesiodistally compressed molars, and the Zhangheotheriidae, a group restricted to Asia and bearing a more plesiomorphic dentition. Of this latter group, only three genera have been previously described. Zhangheotherium quinquecuspidens23 is known by a nearly complete skeleton and a second, badly crushed but ontogenetically younger specimen24, showing evidence of tooth replacement. A second genus, Maotherium, is known by two specimens from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of Liaoning Province, China (the same unit that yielded Zhangheotherium). The type species, M. sinensis25, is represented by a flattened but fully articulated skeleton with associated soft tissue impressions. A second species, M. asiaticus26, is represented by a beautifully preserved but only partially described skeleton. Only one zhangheotheriid is known from outside China—Kiyatherium cardiodens27, from the Lower Cretaceous Ilek Formation of western Siberia. The holotype is an isolated maxilla fragment bearing the canine and most of the postcanine dentition. Additional material was described by Lopatin et al.28, including a second maxilla and several dentary fragments, permitting description of the complete lower dentition.

We describe a new zhangheotheriid, also from the Yixian Formation, represented by a partial skull and associated dentaries. Upon analysis, this taxon is positioned at the base of the Zhangheotheriidae. The rostrum and much of the orbital mosaic are well preserved. Despite the lack of preservation of the basicranium and postcranial skeleton, this specimen is the first symmetrodont in which the crown morphology for the complete dental series is fully exposed, showing a formula of I4/3 C1/1 P5/4 M3/4; as most of the record of trechnotherian diversity consists of isolated teeth and fragmentary jaws, our new specimen provides an opportunity to explore postcanine positional homology across symmetrodonts. A postcanine count of five premolars and three molars is generally regarded as primitive for therians29, suggesting that this tooth count may be primitive for Trechnotheria as a whole.

Results

Systematic Paleontology

Class Mammalia Linnaeus, 1758

Superlegion Trechnotheria McKenna29

Family Zhangheotheriidae Rougier, Ji, and Novacek25

Anebodon luoi, gen. et sp. nov.

Holotype: A partial skull and associated dentaries with nearly complete upper and lower dentition (STM 38-4, Tianyu Museum of Nature, Shandong Province, China. Figs 1, 2, 3, Figs S1 and 2 and Table 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Stereophotographs of the skull of the zhangheotheriid Anebodon luoi, gen. et sp. nov., in dorsal (a), ventral (b), right lateral (c) and left lateral (d) views; illustrations of the skull in dorsal (e), ventral (f), and left lateral (g) views. Illustrations are enlarged to show detail and are not to same scale as photographs. Dotted fill represents matrix. Abbreviations: al, anterior lamina of petrosal; as, alisphenoid; ax, axis; bs, basisphenoid; ef, ethmoidal foramen; fdv, foramen for frontal diploic vein; fr, frontal; if, incisive foramen; iof, infraorbital foramen; lac, lacrimal; lf, lateral flange of petrosal; mapf, major palatine foramen; mpf, minor palatine foramen; mx, maxilla; na, nasal; os, orbitosphenoid; otc, anterior opening of orbitotemporal canal; pa, parietal; pal, palatine; pmx, premaxilla; smx, septomaxilla; spf, sphenopalatine foramen.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Right (a–f) and left (g–l) dentaries of the zhangheotheriid Anebodon luoi, gen. et sp. nov., in lateral (a,d,g,j), dorsal (b,e,h,k), and medial (c,f,i,l) views. Abbreviation: mg, Meckel’s groove.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Left upper (a–d) and left lower (e–h) dentition of the zhangheotheriid Anebodon luoi, gen. et sp. nov., in occlusal (a,c,f,h), buccal (b,d) and lingual(e,g) views, showing canine and postcanine teeth. The lower m4 is reflected from the right side.

Table 1: Measurements (in mm) of the dentition of the zhangheotheriid Anebodon luoi, gen. et sp. nov. L-left side; R-right side.

Etymology: From the Greek anebos, young, in reference to the relatively late replacement of the last premolar position, and the Greek odontos, tooth, a common suffix for Mesozoic mammals. The species name honours Zhe-Xi Luo for his contribution to the study of Mesozoic mammals.

Horizon and Locality: Yixian Formation, Lower Cretaceous, dated about 123 Mya; Beipiao, Liaoning Province, China.

Diagnosis: Zhangheotheriid differing from Maotherium and Zhangheotherium in having a postcanine dental formula of P5/4 M3/4, and in more obtuse triangulation of distal molars. Further differs from Zhangheotherium in having upper molars with deeper ectoflexus, subequal cusp B and metacone, and well-developed lingual cingulum, and lower molars with paraconid taller than metaconid. Differs from Maotherium and Kiyatherium in the absence of upper molar parastyle and less reduction of ultimate molar. Most closely resembles Kiyatherium but differs in having double-rooted upper canine, molariform P3/p3, and weaker upper molar ectocingulum and lingual cingulum.

Description and Comparisons

Skull

A detailed description and additional images of the skull, dentary, and dentition of Anebodon can be found in the Supplementary Information. Anebodon is now the third zhangheotheriid known by cranial material. Unfortunately, most of the descriptions of Maotherium and Zhangheotherium are focused on the character-rich petrosal, which is not preserved in our new taxon. However, some comparisons with these taxa can be made from the limited overlapping described skull regions and from gleaning morphological information from the character dataset of Ji et al.26. The skull of Anebodon is relatively low-vaulted and generally primitive in construction (Fig. 1), as in other zhangheotheriids. While generally well preserved in three dimensions, the skull is distorted such that the right side is sheared anteriorly relative to the left side (most apparent along the posterior margin of the palate, Fig. 1b,f). This distortion affects to some degree the appearance and relative sizes of the bones in the orbitotemporal region and what remains of the sidewall of the braincase, and the associated crushing has made some sutural boundaries difficult to interpret. The slender appearance of the snout (in dorsal and ventral views) is due to the collapse of most of the right half of the palate. In general proportions, the skull of Anebodon would likely have resembled that reconstructed for Maotherium sinensis25.

The lateral margin of the nasal cavity is formed by a relatively large septomaxilla (Fig. 1d,g), a primitive condition shared with other zhangheotheriids. This bone bears a medially-directed horizontal process, though it is unclear if a septomaxillary foramen is present due to matrix infill. The vertical portion of the bone tapers posterodorsally but is damaged, making it impossible to determine if it contacted the maxilla (as in Vincelestes30) or if the facial process of the premaxilla separated it from the maxilla (as in docodonts31). The premaxilla is similarly damaged, so contact between it and the nasals cannot be determined. A moderate-sized infraorbital foramen is present on the facial portion of the maxilla above the ultimate premolar, but this region is damaged and no additional foramina are visible. The nasals are anteriorly narrow in dorsal view and broaden considerably posteriorly towards their relatively straight contact with the frontals (Fig. 1a,e), as in Maotherium sinensis25. It should be noted that the nasals are scored as posteriorly narrow by Ji et al.26 in both Maotherium and Zhangheotherium. No nasal foramina are visible.

The hard palate extends posterior to the last upper molar, and palatal vacuities and postpalatine torus are lacking (Fig. 1b,f). Alveoli for four subequal incisors, I1–I4, are contained entirely within the premaxilla. The I4 alveolus is concave laterally, contouring a pronounced groove on the root of the tooth. The canine alveolus is entirely within the maxilla. A thickened posterior prong of the palatine bears a well-defined minor palatine foramen opening into the floor of the orbit (Fig. 1f,g).

The frontal and lacrimal have limited orbital exposure, with most of the anteromedial wall of the orbit formed by a large perpendicular process of the palatine (Figs 1 and S1), the condition in mammaliaforms such as Morganucodon and Haldanodon31,32, and differing from that in multituberculates which have large orbital contributions from the frontal and maxilla33. While not described, the zhangheotheriids Maotherium and Zhangheotherium were scored as having expansive orbital exposure of the maxilla26. The ethmoidal foramen is positioned at the suture between frontal and palatine, and the frontal forms the entire anterior opening of the orbitotemporal canal (Fig. S1). A well-defined, anterodorsally-directed foramen is present at the presumed posterior extent of the palatine where this bone would have met the sphenoid complex. A possible identification for this foramen is the transverse canal, a feature common among extant metatherians and in some eutherians34,35, but so far limited among non-therians to the multituberculate Kryptobaatar33. The orbitosphenoid is comparable in development to Morganucodon31 and Kryptobaatar. The alisphenoid is interpreted as a relatively large and broad element, contacting the frontal at its anterodorsal margin. Much of the inferior portion of the alisphenoid is missing; accordingly, other major openings in the sidewall of the braincase cannot be identified. A thickened vertical ridge is interpreted as the suture between alisphenoid and anterior lamina of the petrosal. The posterior extent of the latter element is missing, but it appears likely that the relative proportions of these two bones were similar to the condition in the zatherian Vincelestes36.

The alveolar portions of both dentaries are well preserved, but each is missing most or all of the posteroventral portion behind the tooth row. From available evidence, the dentary of Anebodon differs little from other zhangheotheriids; the coronoid process ascends at a low angle (~150°), and a well-defined Meckel’s groove is present on the medial side of the dentary (Fig. 2).

Dentition

The dental formula of Anebodon is interpreted as I4/3 C1/1 P5/4 M3/4, with the left side of the specimen preserving evidence of the entire upper and lower dentition (Figs 1,2 and S2). Anebodon is referred to the Zhangheotheriidae based primarily on features of the dentition. Anebodon can be distinguished from tinodontids in that the upper and lower molars are better triangulated (Fig. 3). It differs from spalacotheriids in the strong development of cusp B and retention of a large metacone, as well as the presence of a strong lingual cingulum and the lack of mesiodistal compression of the molars. Both upper and lower canines are small in Anebodon, a feature shared among tinodontids and zhangheotheriids. The upper canine crown is premolariform and double-rooted, while the lower crown is incisiform and single-rooted.

The first two upper and lower premolars in Anebodon are premolariform. The P2 is very small and has a single, heavy root though it is grooved buccally and may divide deeper in the alveolus (Fig. 3b,d). Due to its small size, it is possible that this tooth could be interpreted as a retained DP1, but based on the very limited evidence for replacement at this position in Mesozoic mammals we prefer a conservative approach. The lower p2 bears a distinct but damaged metaconid. The remaining premolars are strongly molariform, with the upper premolars having a progressively better-developed lingual cingulum (complete on the P5). The P4 is the tallest tooth in the postcanine series, even accounting for the incomplete eruption of the P5. The crowns of the P5/p4 lack wear and are not fully erupted, as the distal base of the crowns has yet to clear the alveolar margin (Fig. 3b,e); evidence of replacement at these tooth positions establishes a minimum upper and lower premolar count which we interpret to be the full adult condition (see Discussion below). Among zhangheotheriids, Anebodon differs most strikingly from the well-represented Zhangheotherium and Maotherium in postcanine dental formula. These two genera, known by multiple nearly complete skeletons, have postcanine counts of P2/3 M5/5-6 and P1-2/1-3 M4-5/6, respectively23,24,25,26. These differ considerably from the count of P5/4 M3/4 in Anebodon. We consider the increase in number of molars in some zhangheotheriids to be derived (but see discussion below), with our new taxon more closely resembling tinodontids in this regard.

The mesial molars in Anebodon are more acutely triangulated than the ultimate premolars (M1 = 95°, m1 = 85°). The main accessory cusps are well developed, though the metacone/metaconid and metastylar region decrease in size distally (Figs 3 and S2). The upper molars have a complete and rather crenulated lingual cingulum. Molars of Anebodon differ from Zhangheotherium and Maotherium in lacking progressively more acute triangulation of the three main cusps distally through the molar series, a feature which these other taxa share with more derived spalacotheriids22. Instead, the cusp angle in Anebodon increases slightly distally, and by the ultimate lower molar (m4) the main cusps are nearly in-line (Figs 3h and S2k). Anebodon further differs from Zhangheotherium in the strong development of the upper molar lingual cingulid and greater depth of the ectoflexus; upper molars of the new taxon differ from those of Maotherium in lacking a parastyle and development of a mesially-projecting parastylar hook.

Among known zhangheotheriids, comparisons to Kiyatherium cardiodens28 are most favourable. The two partial maxillae referred to Kiyatherium preserve evidence of the entire postcanine dentition, originally interpreted as P1–4 and M1–4 with the first upper molar undergoing replacement (designated as RM128). However, molars are by definition never replaced37, and this fifth postcanine should be identified as the P5. Contrary to the original interpretation, it is likely that both maxillae referred to Kiyatherium bear the entire molar series, with the M3 more reduced in size in the holotype specimen28. Though damaged, it is clear that the P5 of the referred specimen is less worn than the M1 and belongs to a different tooth generation. Under our interpretation, Anebodon and Kiyatherium share a postcanine dental formula of P5/4 M3/4. These two taxa are also broadly similar in molar morphology, and differ only in that Anebodon possesses a relative more molariform the third premolar, double-rooted upper canine, weaker development of upper molar cingula, and less reduction of the ultimate upper and lower molars.

Discussion

Zhangheotheriids are trechnotherian mammals forming the sister group to the Spalacotheriidae in most recent analyses13,19,38. Despite limited taxonomic diversity, zhangheotheriids are known by relatively well-preserved material including partial skulls and nearly complete skeletons23,24,25,26,28. The known record of this group is restricted to the Early Cretaceous of China and Siberia. Zhangheotheriids share a peculiar morphology of the posterior part of the dentary, namely a deep notch separating the slender, reclined coronoid process from the stout, upturned condylar process. As in spalacotheriids, an angular process is absent but a medially-directed pterygoid flange is generally developed along the ventral and posterior margin of the postdentary region. The molariforms in zhangheotheriids are somewhat intermediate in morphology between tinodontids and spalacotheriids; the primary cusps are somewhat more acutely triangulated than in tinodontids and further decrease in angle posteriorly through the molar series, especially with regards to the upper molars (though the angle actually increases distally in Anebodon and Kiyatherium, Fig. 3). The upper molars are further derived (with respect to tinodontids) in the tall height of cusp B as well as the possession of a strong lingual cingulum. However, the molar cusps are conical and lack tight, preformed occlusal fit with the opposing teeth, which develops only after wear (a primitive condition). The apices of the stylocone and metastyle only participate in shearing once the pre- and postvallum crests have worn considerably.

Most of these dental and mandibular features uniting zhangheotheriids are either plesiomorphic or can be viewed as transitional between tinodontids and more derived spalacotheriids. Not surprisingly, our result suggests that Zhangheotheridae represent a paraphyletic group, with Anebodon and Kiyatherium occupying a basal position (Fig. 4). These two taxa are least derived among zhangheotheriids with respect to distal molar triangulation and number of upper molars. However, it is worth noting that Anebodon and Kiyatherium have a postcanine dental formula of P5/4 M3/4, a condition shared (at least in part) with basal therians (the aegialodontid Kielantherium likely has a lower postcanine count of p4/m439). In contrast, spalacotheriids increase the number of molariforms up to seven. This suggests that there were two evolutionary trends among acute-angled symmetrodonts: one retaining a relatively low molar count leading to therians, and the other increasing molar count to specialised spalacotheriids (and occurring in parallel among dryolestoids22).

Figure 4: Cladogram of relationships of selected zhangheotheriid and spalacotheriid trechnotherian mammals, modified from the analysis of Sweetman51.
Figure 4

Colours represent global distribution of taxa. Taxa in grey box represent the Zhangheotheriidae, a paraphyletic group in this analysis. Time scale modified from Gradstein et al.53

An additional feature which appears to characterise zhangheotheriids is the strong molarization of the posterior premolars. Moreover, based on evidence from Anebodon, the ultimate premolar is replaced at a relatively advanced ontogenetic stage; instead of occurring in concert with eruption of the last molar, as is characteristic of therians40, the ultimate premolar was replaced after the last molar had accumulated substantial wear (Figs 3 and S2a). The lack of a clear morphological break in the postcanine series has led to differences in nomenclature with regards to the premolar-molar boundary in this and similar groups, with related inconsistencies in tooth formulae. For instance, specimens of the zhangheotheriid Kiyatherium from the Early Cretaceous of Siberia record clear replacement of the fifth postcanine upper tooth (a molariform), yet this position is identified as the M1 with the successional tooth given the awkward moniker of ‘RM1’ for ‘replacement M1’41. Our specimen has the same number of postcanine teeth and shows evidence of replacement at the same locus (Fig. 3). Molars, as defined by Owen37, are a posterior extension of the primary dental series (derived from the primary dental lamina) and are not replaced. Premolars, on the other hand, are defined as postcanines which exhibit replacement; as such, deciduous premolars belong to the primary dental series and adult premolars to the secondary series. In some instances, anterior postcanines are not replaced (e.g., P1 in eutherians); the definition can simply be amended such that a molar is any tooth posterior to the last postcanine showing evidence of replacement. Accordingly, we regard the tooth in question in Anebodon and Kiyatherium as the ultimate premolar (P5). Along these lines, it is possible that the postcanine formula in other zhangheotheriids should be reinterpreted. In the juvenile specimen of Zhangheotherium26, the tooth identified as the m1 may instead be the dp4. The p3 position is undergoing replacement—if premolar replacement was alternating, as in Dryolestes and basal therians42,43 and as appears to be the case in Zhangheotherium, the presence of an unshed dp2 implies that the fourth postcanine is the dp4 and that this tooth will likely be replaced at a later ontogenetic stage. This interpretation matches the relatively early ontogenetic age of this individual (relative to the holotype of Zhangheotherium quinquecuspidens), and reduces the disparity in lower dental formula among zhangheotheriids.

Far from an issue of semantics, identification of postcanine tooth positions affects interpretation of homology across Mesozoic lineages (particularly those at the base of the therian line) and reconstruction of ontogenetic processes such as the timing and pattern of tooth replacement. We interpret our specimen to have an upper postcanine formula of P5/M3, which is generally thought to be the primitive count for therians29,44. Additionally, the penultimate upper premolar (P4) in Anebodon is the tallest tooth in the postcanine series, a feature also characteristic of therians29. Some degree of molarization of the posterior premolars also occurs in various spalacotheriids45,46,47, but evidence of replacement of strongly molariform teeth is currently lacking in this derived group. Retention of molariform premolars in the adult dentition is also a characteristic of the endemic South American meridiolestidan dryolestoids48; the distribution of this feature suggests that it is basal to the Trechnotheria and possibly represents the primitive condition for the therian line25. Ultimately, the craniodental morphology of Anebodon and the implications raised by its placement at the base of a paraphyletic Zhangheotheriidae highlight the need for a more expansive analysis to explore the interrelationships of basal trechnotherians and, more pointedly, the role these symmetrodont taxa play in an improved understanding of therian evolution.

Methods

Terminology and conventions

Dental measurements are shown in Table 1. We follow the measurement conventions and terminologies of Cifelli and Madsen49 and Rougier et al.25,50. However, we employ traditional therian terminology for tooth structures that have been proposed as homologous in symmetrodonts (e.g., cusp C = metacone, cusp d = hypoconid); see recent review in Davis18.

Phylogenetic analysis

The data matrix was based on that of Sweetman51 with an additional character (molarization of the ultimate premolar; see the Supplementary Information for complete character list). Our new taxon and Kiyatherium were added to the matrix. In addition, we updated some scores for Maotherium for characters 3, 24, and 28 based on our observations (BD). The data matrix consisting of 17 taxa and 30 characters was analyzed using a traditional search of TNT52. All characters are equally-weighted and non-additive. The TNT analysis produced 10 most parsimonious trees with a tree length of 65 steps, a consistency index of 0.53, and a retention index of 0.72; a strict consensus of these is presented in Fig. 4.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Bi, S. et al. A new symmetrodont mammal (Trechnotheria: Zhangheotheriidae) from the Early Cretaceous of China and trechnotherian character evolution. Sci. Rep. 6, 26668; doi: 10.1038/srep26668 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    Mesozoic Mammalia. III. Preliminary comparison of Jurassic mammals except multituberculates. Am. J. Sci. 10, 559–569 (1925).

  2. 2.

    A Catalogue of the Mesozoic Mammalia in the Geological Department of the British Museum. (Trustees of the British Museum, 1928).

  3. 3.

    American Mesozoic Mammalia. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum 3, 1–235 (1929).

  4. 4.

    , & The Welsh pantothere Kuehneotherium praecursoris. Zool. J. Linn.Soc. 47, 407–423 (1968).

  5. 5.

    & Shuotherium dongi, n. gen. and sp., a therian with pseudo-tribosphenic molars from the Jurassic of Sichuan, China. Aust. Mammal. 5, 127–142 (1982).

  6. 6.

    Discovery of a Late Jurassic Chinese mammal in the upper Bathonian of England. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris 327, 571–576 (1998).

  7. 7.

    & In Mesozoic Mammals: The First Two-thirds of Mammalian History (eds , & ) 150–161 (University of California Press, 1979).

  8. 8.

    & Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. (Columbia University Press, 1997).

  9. 9.

    Definition, diagnosis, and origin of Mammalia. J. Vert. Paleontol. 8, 241–264 (1988).

  10. 10.

    , & Basicranial anatomy of Priacodon fruitaensis (Triconodontidae, Mammalia) from the Late Jurassic of Colorado, and a reappraisal of mammaliaform interrelationships. Am. Mus. Novit. 3183, 1–38 (1996).

  11. 11.

    , & In quest for a phylogeny of Mesozoic mammals. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 47, 1–78 (2002).

  12. 12.

    et al. Evolutionary development in basal mammaliaforms as revealed by a docodontan. Science 347, 760–764, 10.1126/science.1260880 (2015).

  13. 13.

    , , & The Miocene mammal Necrolestes demonstrates the survival of a Mesozoic non-therian lineage into the late Cenozoic of South America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20053–20058 (2012).

  14. 14.

    et al. A Cretaceous eutriconodont and integument evolution in early mammals. Nature 526, 380–384, 10.1038/nature14905 (2015).

  15. 15.

    The teeth of the Jurassic mammals. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 109, 329–356 (1939).

  16. 16.

    Early Cretaceous mammals and the evolution of mammalian molar teeth. Fieldiana: Geology 13, 1–105 (1956).

  17. 17.

    In Early Mammals (eds & ) 65–87 (Zool. J. Linn. Soc., Suppl. 1, London, 1971).

  18. 18.

    Evolution of the tribosphenic molar pattern in early mammals, with comments on the “Dual-Origin” hypothesis. J. Mamm. Evol. 18, 227–244 (2011).

  19. 19.

    et al. First cranial remains of a gondwanatherian mammal reveal remarkable mosaicism. Nature 515, 512–517, 10.1038/nature13922 (2014).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Mandibular and dental characteristics of Late Triassic mammaliaform Haramiyavia and their ramifications for basal mammal evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E7101–E7109 10.1073/pnas.1519387112 (2015).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Three new Jurassic euharamiyidan species reinforce early divergence of mammals. Nature 514, 579–584 10.1038/nature13718 (2014).

  22. 22.

    , & Mammals from the Age of Dinosaurs: Structure, Relationships, and Paleobiology. (Columbia Univeristy Press, 2004).

  23. 23.

    , , & A new symmetrodont mammal from China and its implications for mammalian evolution. Nature 390, 137–142 (1997).

  24. 24.

    & New study on dental and skeletal features of the Cretaceous “symmetrodontan” mammal Zhangheotherium. J. Mamm. Evol. 12, 337–357 (2005).

  25. 25.

    , & A new symmetrodont mammal with fur impressions from the Mesozoic of China. Acta Geol. Sin.(Engl.) 77, 7–14 (2003).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Evolutionary development of the middle ear in Mesozoic therian mammals. Science 326, 278–281 (2009).

  27. 27.

    , & A new Early Cretaceous mammal from western Siberia. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 386, 715–717 (2002).

  28. 28.

    , , & Early Cretaceous mammals of Western Siberia: 3. Zhangheotheriidae. Paleontological Journal 44, 573–583 (2010).

  29. 29.

    In Phylogeny of the Primates (eds & ) 21–46 (Plenum Press, 1975).

  30. 30.

    Vincelestes neuquenianus Bonaparte (Mammalia, Theria) un Primitivo Mamífero del Cretácico Inferior de la Cuenca Neuquina, Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires (1993).

  31. 31.

    , & The skull of Morganucodon. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 71, 1–158 (1981).

  32. 32.

    & Cranio-mandibular anatomy of Haldanodon exspectatus (Docodonta; Mammalia) from the Late Jurassic of Portugal and its implications to the evolution of mammalian characters. Contrib. Geol. Univ. Wyo. 28, 39–138 (1991).

  33. 33.

    & The cranial anatomy of Kryptobaatar dashzevegi (Mammalia, Multituberculata), and its bearing on the evolution of mammalian characters. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 247, 1–124 (2000).

  34. 34.

    Morphology, adaptations, and relationships of Plesiorycteropus: and a diagnosis of a new order of eutherian mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 220, 1–214 (1994).

  35. 35.

    & Patterns of evolutionary transformation in the petrosal bone and some basicranial features in marsupial mammals, with special reference to didelphids. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 40, 26–45, 10.1046/j.1439-0469.2002.00173.x (2002).

  36. 36.

    & Braincase structure in the oldest known skull of a therian mammal: implications for mammalian systematics and cranial evolution. Am. J. Sci. 293, 268–299 (1993).

  37. 37.

    On the Anatomy of Vertebrates. Volume III. Mammals. (Longmans, Greens and Co., 1868).

  38. 38.

    , , & A Jurassic mammaliaform and the earliest mammalian evolutionary adaptations. Nature 500, 163–167, 10.1038/nature12429 (2013).

  39. 39.

    & The lower jaw of an aegialodontid mammal from the Early Cretaceous of Mongolia. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 82, 217–227 (1984).

  40. 40.

    In Mammal Phylogeny, Volume 2–Mesozoic Differentiation, Multituberculates, Monotremes, Early Therians, and Marsupials Vol. 1 (eds , & ) 182–204 (Springer-Verlag, Inc., 1993).

  41. 41.

    et al. Early Cretaceous mammals from western Siberia. 1. Tinodontidae. Paleontologiceskij Zurnal 39, 523–534 (2005).

  42. 42.

    Tooth replacement in Late Jurassic Dryolestidae (Eupantotheria, Mammalia). J. Mamm. Evol. 4, 1–18 (1997).

  43. 43.

    A novel interpretation of the tribosphenidan mammal Slaughteria eruptens from the Early Cretaceous Trinity Group, and implications for dental formula in early mammals. J. Vert. Paleontol. 31, 676–683 (2011).

  44. 44.

    et al. The placental mammal ancestor and the post–K-Pg radiation of placentals. Science 339, 662–667, 10.1126/science.1229237 (2013).

  45. 45.

    , , , & New Early Cretaceous spalacotheriid “symmetrodont” mammal from Japan. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 49, 329–346 (2004).

  46. 46.

    Therian teeth of unusual design from the medial Cretaceous (Albian-Cenomanian) Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah. J. Mamm. Evol. 6, 247–270 (1999).

  47. 47.

    , , & A new spalacotheriid symmentrodont from the Early Cretaceous of northeastern China. Am. Mus. Novit. 3475, 1–20 (2005).

  48. 48.

    , & Highly specialized mammalian skulls from the Late Cretaceous of South America. Nature 479, 98–102 (2011).

  49. 49.

    & Spalacotheriid symmetrodonts (Mammalia) from the medial Cretaceous (upper Albian or lower Cenomanian) Mussentuchit local fauna, Cedar Mountain Formation, Utah, USA. Geodiversitas 21, 167–214 (1999).

  50. 50.

    , & A new specimen of Eurylambda aequicrurius and considerations on “symmetrodont” dentition and relationships. Am. Mus. Novit. 3394, 1–15 (2003).

  51. 51.

    A spalacolestine spalacotheriid (Mammalia, Trechnotheria) from the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) of southern England and its bearing on spalacotheriid evolution. Palaeontology 51, 1367–1385 (2008).

  52. 52.

    Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 15, 415–428 (1999).

  53. 53.

    , , & The Geologic Time Scale 2012. (Elsevier, 2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Shuhua Xie for specimen preparation, and Wending Zhang and Aijuan Shi for SEM imaging and illustration. The study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 program, 2012CB821906), the National Science Foundation of China (41128002), and the Hundred Talents Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705, USA

    • Shundong Bi
    •  & Nicole Robinson
  2. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China

    • Shundong Bi
    •  & Jin Meng
  3. Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature, Pingyi, Shandong 273300, China

    • Xiaoting Zheng
    •  & Xiaoli Wang
  4. Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong 276000, China

    • Xiaoting Zheng
    •  & Xiaoli Wang
  5. Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 10024, USA

    • Jin Meng
  6. Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, 511 S. Floyd St., Louisville, KY 40202, USA

    • Brian Davis

Authors

  1. Search for Shundong Bi in:

  2. Search for Xiaoting Zheng in:

  3. Search for Jin Meng in:

  4. Search for Xiaoli Wang in:

  5. Search for Nicole Robinson in:

  6. Search for Brian Davis in:

Contributions

S.B., X.Z. and J.M. conceived and designed the research. S.B. and B.D. performed the comparative and analytical work and wrote the paper. J.M., X.Z., X.W. and N.R. collected data and contributed to the writing and discussion.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shundong Bi or Brian Davis.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26668

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.