Introduction

Designing novel and efficient energy-conversion materials has been of great importance in extricating the predicaments of global energy shortage and underutilization of energy resources. Thermoelectric (TE) materials are capable of converting waste heat directly into electricity1. The performance of a TE material is governed by the dimensionless figure of merit, defined as , where T is the absolute temperature, S the Seebeck coefficient, σ the electrical conductivity and κ the thermal conductivity. The κ includes the lattice and the electronic components. One effective way to improve ZT is to reduce the κ, especially the lattice thermal conductivity (LTC), via enhancing phonon scattering rates2,3,4,5,6,7. In our previous study8, a concept of part-crystalline part-liquid (PCPL) state was proposed. Materials in such a state, manifesting the coexistence of rigid crystalline sublattices and fluctuating noncrystalline substructures, are very likely to possess extremely low LTCs, which can be treated as potentially promising TE materials.

Investigating intrinsic crystal structures and corresponding lattice dynamic properties is conducive to understanding the differences between crystalline and PCPL materials. Ternary Cu-Sb-Se materials (Cu3SbSe4, CuSbSe2 and Cu3SbSe3) provide a suitable platform, as they are composed by the same elements but present distinct crystal structures and consequently dissimilar thermal transport properties9. Their intrinsically low LTCs are gratifying for TE conversion, especially the extremely low LTC in Cu3SbSe310,11. The LTCs of Cu3SbSe4 and CuSbSe2 show a classical temperature dependence of T−1, while that of Cu3SbSe3 is nearly temperature-independent10. Such an abnormal thermal transport behavior has also been found in many other material systems, such as Cu2Se12,13, AgSbTe214,15,16 and β-K2Bi8Se1317. Different interpretations have been proposed to qualitatively explain these anomalous low intrinsic LTC, including strong anharmonicity18,19, lone s2 pair interaction9,14,15 and complex compositions17,20. However, the physical origin of the low LTC is still a riddle in respect of lattice dynamics. Based on ab initio density functional calculations, here we systematically study the harmonic and anharmonic temperature-dependent lattice dynamics of the three Cu-Sb-Se compounds. The results indicate that compounds with and without chemical-bond hierarchy will display quite diverse behaviors in atomic vibrations, phonon-phonon interactions and thermal transports, which can provide us an effective strategy to search and design TE materials with low LTCs.

Results and Discussion

Crystal structures and dynamic behaviors

The calculated equilibrium lattice constants for Cu3SbSe4 (a = b = 5.736 Å and c = 11.411 Å), CuSbSe2 (a = 6.467 Å, b = 4.045 Å and c = 15.048 Å) and Cu3SbSe3 (a = 8.099 Å, b = 10.672 Å and c = 6.936 Å) are in good agreement with the experimental data21,22 and a previous study10. The compounds Cu3SbSe4 and CuSbSe2 have the diamond-like structures, as shown in Fig. 1(a,b), with Cu atoms occupied in the center of Se-formed tetrahedrons. As shown in Fig. 1(c), Cu3SbSe3 has an orthorhombic crystal structure with the Pnma space group. The Cu atoms mainly locate in the Se-formed tetrahedrons; however, the intrinsic structural channel allows Cu1 atoms to vibrate with large amplitudes around their equilibrium positions, especially in the z direction. The key structural difference between Cu3SbSe4 and CuSbSe2 is that the Sb atoms are whether disengaged from the tetrahedrons and the crystal structure is whether twisted due to the lone pair s2-induced redistribution in the former compound. Though the sublattices of Cu atoms look similar among the three compounds, there is no intrinsic structural channel in Cu3SbSe4 or CuSbSe2.

Figure 1
figure 1

Crystal structures (a) Cu3SbSe4. (b) CuSbSe2. (c) Cu3SbSe3.

Figure 2 shows the trajectories of atoms from MD simulations at 400 K. For Cu3SbSe4 and CuSbSe2, both Fig. 2(a,b) illustrate that all the atoms are constrained around their equilibrium positions, indicating that they are in the crystalline state. However for Cu3SbSe3 (Fig. 2(c)), the part-liquid sublattice appears from the liquid-like random diffusion of Cu atoms, whereas the Se and Sb atoms are constrained around their equilibrium positions. The compound is thus in a mixed part-crystalline part-liquid state, containing one crystalline rigid part and the other liquid fluctuating sublattice8. To gain a better understanding about the origin of differentiated dynamic behaviors in these ternary compounds, the chemical-bond strength should be investigated.

Figure 2
figure 2

Trajectories of atoms from molecular dynamics simulations for (a) Cu3SbSe4, (b) CuSbSe2 and (c) Cu3SbSe3 at 400 K.

Atomic displacement parameter (ADP), which is defined as the mean-square amplitude of vibration of an atom around its equilibrium position, is calculated based on full phonon dispersions8,23. A relatively larger ADP value generally means that the corresponding atom vibrates more about its equilibrium position than other atoms, physically implicating the weak restoring forces on the vibrating atoms due to the existence of the weak bonding24,25. The ADPs of the atoms in Cu3SbSe4 and CuSbSe2 are almost in the homogenous level (<0.02 Å2), as shown in Fig. 3(a,b), respectively. None of the atoms in the two compounds is relatively weakly bonded and consequently their melting points should be comparable due to the nonhierarchical chemical bonds, according to the classical Lindemann criterion of melting26. However, as shown in Fig. 3(c), the calculated ADP data of Cu1 atoms in the z direction (Cu1z) is at least twice larger than those for other species in Cu3SbSe3. The Cu1z accordingly are weakly bonded and thus the compound reveals bonding strength hierarchy and atomic-level inhomogeneity. The melting state firstly occurs in the Cu1z-participated sublattice as the temperature increases. Similar behaviors can be observed in the Cu2 atoms due to their large ADP values along the x and z directions. In this regard, the appearance of the mixed PCPL state in Cu3SbSe3, as also represented in Fig. 2(c), is ascribed to the bonding strength hierarchy. Indeed, the experimental melting points of Cu3SbSe4 and CuSbSe2 are about 730 K27 and 750 K28, respectively, which demonstrates the typical crystalline character and homogeneous bonding strength in the two systems. Furthermore, the order-disorder transition of Cu atoms in Cu3SbSe3 was observed at finite temperatures29,30. Bonding strength hierarchy thus becomes an indicator of the appearance of part-crystalline state.

Figure 3
figure 3

Calculated atomic displacement parameters (ADP) for three compounds.

For (c) Cu3SbSe3, the ADPs for Sb, Se, Cu2y, Cu1x and Cu1y are within the belt region. The dashed line is for a guide for the eye.

Harmonic and anharmonic properties

Accordingly, investigating both harmonic and anharmonic phonon interactions at low temperatures can render deep understandings for different types of Cu-Sb-Se compounds. In the model adopted for calculating the LTC, three physical parameters (Debye temperatures, group velocities and Grüneisen parameters) should be determined from several theoretical approximations and the details are represented in Refs 8,10. For the three compounds, these parameters for each acoustic phonon mode were averaged by the weight of high-symmetry points, which are listed in Table 1. The CuSbSe2 compound is a “transitional” structure, since it possesses the homogeneous bonding strength (or ADP values) similar to Cu3SbSe4 and the lone pair s2 electrons similar to Cu3SbSe3. Harmonic properties, which are the reflections of the bonding stiffness including Debye temperatures and group velocities, of CuSbSe2 correspondingly lie between those of Cu3SbSe4 and Cu3SbSe3, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Debye temperature (θ), group velocities (v) and averaged Grüneisen parameters (γ) for the three compounds.

The anharmonic properties, which cannot be characterized by either atomic trajectories or ADPs, are represented by the Grüneisen parameter (γ), which is related to the third-order (or even higher-order) anharmonic potential well. The intensity of phonon anharmonicity of CuSbSe2 also lies between those of Cu3SbSe4 and Cu3SbSe3 (Table 1). To clarify the origins of phonon anharmonic interactions in Cu-Sb-Se compounds at low temperatures, partial Grüneisen parameters, describing the projected contributions from given atom types, are estimated by projecting the total Grüneisen parameter γ(q, i) onto an atom type μ in the α direction as follows8,

where eα(q, i, v) is the phonon polarization vector of a set of atoms ν derived from the dynamical matrix, i the phonon mode and q the wave vector. The averaged partial Grüneisen parameters for transverse acoustic (TA with a lower group velocity and TA’ with a higher one) and longitudinal acoustic (LA) modes are calculated by , which are shown in Fig. 4. For the close-packed diamond-like Cu3SbSe4 structure, the phonon anharmonic interactions is closely associated with the Se atoms (Fig. 4), which form 3D-frameworks for the whole system based on the CuSe4 and SbSe4 tetrahedrons. In this quasi-isotropic rigid network, the phonon-phonon interactions consequently are mainly determined by the spatial topology of Se atoms. However, as shown in Fig. 4, the averaged Grüneisen parameters of CuSbSe2 are mainly contributed by the Sb3+ ions with lone pair s2 electrons, since the residual non-bonding electrons begin to affect phonon modes through producing an extra electrostatic repulsion9,14,15. While for the Cu3SbSe4 and CuSbSe2, the appearance of the PCPL state can be excluded from the localized atomic trajectories in the MD simulations and the homogenous ADP values. The intrinsic structure characteristic therefore becomes a key in determining the lattice anharmonicity and phonon-phonon interactions. For the Cu3SbSe3, though the validity of the concept of phonon becomes questionable due to the diffusive behavior in the part-crystalline part-liquid state, quasi phonons or even localized vibrations can still exist at very low temperatures. As confirmed in the previous study8, the partial Grüneisen parameters of the Cu1 atoms are at least twice larger than those of other atoms for acoustic phonons, indicating that the Cu1 atoms play a predominant role in the intrinsic phonon-phonon interactions at low temperatures. Additionally, the Grüneisen parameters for the Cu1 atoms are overwhelmingly contributed by the z component8, which is consistent with the abnormal large Cu1z ADP and the liquid-like fluctuation behavior at finite temperatures.

Figure 4
figure 4

Average partial Grüneisen parameters for the TA, TA’ and LA mode for three compounds.

Lattice thermal conductivity

By using the harmonic and anharmonic parameters given in Table 1 and the modified Debye-Callaway model, the LTCs can be estimated for the three compounds. Based on the aforementioned analysis, it should be rational to treat bond-homogenous Cu3SbSe4 and CuSbSe2 compounds as traditional crystalline solids and the corresponding thermal transport behaviors are expected to be described by the classical perturbation techniques. As shown in Fig. 5(a,b), the theoretical temperature dependences (~T−1) show acceptable agreements with the experimental data9 by only considering the U and N processes for total phonon scattering rates. The slightly overestimation of the phonon-phonon interaction strength for the CuSbSe2 compound should be attributed to the inaccurate estimates by using three-phonon processes for the higher-order nonlinear correction caused by the lone pair s2 electrons31. Generally, the well-fitted temperature dependence indicates that the anharmonic effect of the extra electrostatic repulsion given by unbonded electrons can still be described effectively by the U and N processes, which also corroborates the rationality of estimating LTCs of crystalline solids by the perturbative phonon-phonon interactions. For the hierarchically bonded Cu3SbSe3, the experimental LTC data21 (Fig. 5(c)) demonstrate a nearly-temperature-independent nature, which significantly deviates from the classical T−1 relationship. A resonant-like phonon scattering rate8 (rattling-like frequency ω0 = 1.0  THz, effective width Δ = 0.2 THz and rattling-concentration-related parameter C*), which approximately describes the rattling-like thermal damping in the PCPL Cu3SbSe3, should be considered in addition to the other phonon scattering processes, including perturbative phonon-phonon U and N processes. The calculated LTC (Fig. 5(c)) accordingly displays an excellent agreement with the experiment in a wide temperature range.

Figure 5
figure 5

Temperature-dependent lattice thermal conductivity for the three compounds. The dotted lines refer to the experimental data.

The solid and dashed lines are our calculated results.

Summary

In summary, the three Cu-Sb-Se compounds exhibit significantly different lattice dynamic behaviors due to the different chemical-bond environments. Cu3SbSe4 and CuSbSe2 compounds are both in the crystalline state due to the homogeneous bonding strength, while the Cu3SbSe3 compound with chemical-bond hierarchy is in the part-crystalline part-liquid hybrid state at elevated temperatures. Harmonic and anharmonic properties vary with respect to the different crystal structures among Cu3SbSe4, CuSbSe2 and Cu3SbSe3 at low temperatures. For the close-packed diamond-like Cu3SbSe4, the phonon anharmonic interactions mainly originate from the Se atoms in the frameworks. While for CuSbSe2, the Sb3+ ions with lone pair s2 electrons dominate the anharmonicity by introducing an extra electrostatic repulsion. The weakly bonded Cu atoms in Cu3SbSe3, especially the Cu1 atoms, have a great influence on phonon-phonon anharmonic processes. For the description of thermal transport, traditional perturbative phonon-phonon interactions well depict LTCs of crystalline bulks (Cu3SbSe4 and CuSbSe2), whereas a rattling-like effective approach should be adopted in addition to the total scattering rate for the PCPL Cu3SbSe3 compound. Our analyses reveal the diverse lattice dynamics in the crystalline and PCPL Cu-Sb-Se materials, which may inspire additional approaches to designing materials with low LTCs for high-performance TE conversion.

Methods

The first-principles calculations were performed in the framework of the density-function theory using the plane wave basis VASP code32,33, implementing the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) form34. The interactions between the ions and electrons were described by the all-electron projector augmented wave (PAW) method35,36, with plane waves up to a cutoff energy of 600 eV. The atomic configurations 3d104s1 for Cu, 5s25p3 for Sb and 4s24p4 for Se atoms were treated as the valence electrons. The Brillouin-zone integrations were performed on the grid of Monkhorst-Pack procedure37. For the unit cell of Cu3SbSe3, CuSbSe2 and Cu3SbSe4, 4 × 3 × 4, 4 × 6 × 2 and 5 × 5 × 3 k-point meshes were used, respectively. To calculate the phonon dispersion curves, we used the direct ab initio force-constant approach, which is implemented in the PHONON software by Parlinski23,38. Supercells with dimensions of 2 × 1 × 2, 2 × 3 × 1 and 2 × 2 × 1 were used for Cu3SbSe3, CuSbSe2 and Cu3SbSe4, respectively. High-symmetry points in Brillouin zones (Γ (0, 0, 0), Z (0.5, 0.5, −0.5), N (0.5, 0, 0), P (0.25, 0.25, 0.25), X (0, 0, 0.5) for Cu3SbSe4, Γ (0, 0, 0), Z (0, 0, 0.5), X (0.5, 0, 0), U (0.5, 0, 0.5), Y (0, 0.5, 0) for CuSbSe2 and Γ (0, 0, 0), R (0.5, 0.5, 0.5), X (0.5, 0, 0), S (0.5, 0.5, 0), T (0, 0.5, 0.5) for Cu3SbSe3) were considered in our phonon dispersion and Grüneisen parameter calculations. The ADP values are calculated based on the partial phonon density of states from DFT calculations. Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations were performed using the GGA of PBE form as implemented in the VASP code with the NVT ensemble. The PAW method was adopted and supercells with 112 atoms (16.20 Å × 10.67 Å × 13.87 Å), 192 atoms (19.40 Å × 16.18 Å × 15.05 Å) and 64 atoms (11.47 Å × 11.47 Å × 11.41 Å) were used for Cu3SbSe3, CuSbSe2 and Cu3SbSe4, respectively.

To calculate the LTC in nonlinear phonon scattering, the Debye-Callaway model39 modified by Asen-Palmer et al.40 was applied, which can be expressed as

where kB, v, θ and τ are the Boltzmann constant, phonon group velocity, Debye temperature and phonon relaxation time, respectively. Here i corresponds to the TA, TA’, or LA mode, while x takes the form as . U and N stand for the phonon-phonon Umklapp and Normal processes, respectively and further details of these expressions are included in Refs 8,40,41. In an ideal semiconductor, the scattering rates in the two processes are both considered to be proportional to γ2 according to traditional theories41,42,43, with γ being the Grüneisen parameter.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Qiu, W. et al. Diverse lattice dynamics in ternary Cu-Sb-Se compounds. Sci. Rep. 5, 13643; doi: 10.1038/srep13643 (2015).