Abstract
Pellet injection and repetitive laser illumination are key technologies for realizing inertial fusion energy. Numerous studies have been conducted on target suppliers, injectors and tracking systems for flying pellet engagement. Here we for the first time demonstrate the pellet injection, counter laser beams' engagement and neutron generation. Deuterated polystyrene (CD) bead pellets, after free-falling for a distance of 18 cm at 1 Hz, are successfully engaged by two counter laser beams from a diode-pumped, ultra-intense laser HAMA. The laser energy, pulse duration, wavelength and the intensity are 0.63 J per beam, 104 fs and 811 nm, 4.7 × 1018 W/cm2, respectively. The irradiated pellets produce D(d,n)3He-reacted neutrons with a maximum yield of 9.5 × 104/4π sr/shot. Moreover, the laser is found out to bore a straight channel with 10 μm-diameter through the 1-mm-diameter beads. The results indicate potentially useful technologies and findings for the next step in realizing inertial fusion energy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Pellet injection and repetitive laser illumination are key technologies for realizing inertial fusion energy1,2. Industrial neutron and X-ray generators using lasers also require a repeating pellet target supplier. Therefore numerous studies have been conducted on target suppliers3, injectors4,5 and tracking systems for engagement6,7,8,9. Recently Carlson reported tracking the targets and steering the low power laser beams to the falling targets with 34 μm standard deviation accuracy10.
Here we demonstrate flying pellet injection, high power counter laser beams' engagement and neutron generation from the pellet.
Results
We succeeded in injection of spherical deuterated polystyrene bead pellets at 1 Hz and symmetrical engagement and irradiation of them with two ultra-intense laser beams. The laser intensity was high enough to produce a DD neutron yield of 9.5 × 104/4π sr/shot. We observed channel formation through the free-falling pellets, which might be the evidence to support a scheme for fast ignition. On an average, approximately 20% of the pellets were irradiated with the HAMA laser11. Neutrons more than 1.0 × 104/4π sr were observed for 2.5% of these pellets. This result represents a step toward laser fusion.
Flying pellet engagement
For most of flying pellets, synchronization is within 50 μs, which is sufficient for pellet engagement. A second harmonic (2ω) laser probe, 104 fs in pulse length is used to take a snapshot of the focused counter beam engaging an injected pellet. Figure 1 shows the probe image for the instance of counter beam engagement captured through an interference filter (IF) of 394 nm by an intensified CCD camera (Princeton Instruments PI-MAX3) with a 20-ns exposure12,13.
Neutron generation
The focused laser accelerates deuterons at the focal spot, which collide with the surrounding cold deuterons to yield DD neutrons2. Figure 2 (a) shows the neutron time-of-flight signals, detected by a plastic scintillator coupled to a photomultiplier and located 1.45 m from the focal point and perpendicular to the laser axis. The solid angle of the detector is 8.4 × 10−3 sr and lower detection limit is 1000 yield/4π sr. The 2.45 MeV timing corresponds to a sharp peak at 150 ns. Using a three-dimensional Monte Carlo particle transport code (Particle and Heavy Ion Transport Code System:PHITS)14, we distinguished the prompt DD fusion signals from those of the scattered neutrons. (Supplementary Fig. 1). By integrating the signals from 138 ns to 200 ns in Figure 2(a), we obtained a maximum neutron yield of 9.5 × 104/4π sr/shot at maximum. Prior to counter engagement with the two beams, we tried an engagement with a single laser beam, which generated a maximum neutron yield of 2.5 × 104/4π sr/shot15. The twin beam result is four times the single beam yield15, although the total laser energy is same at 1.2 J. Figure 3(b) shows shot-by-shot yield variations over 526 shots. The averaged yield is 1328 neutrons/4π sr/shot. Around 2.5% of the shots generated more than 1.0 × 104 neutrons/4π sr. Because the radius of a bead is 0.49 mm, the laser beams only hit the beads falling inside an optimal circle of 0.49 mm radius. Currently, the observed bead placement accuracy is such that only 20% of the beads are within 0.49 mm of laser's focal point in the laser perpendicular direction, corresponding to an average hit rate of less than 20%. (Supplementary Fig. 2). Electrostatic charge on a pellet's surface induces perturbations in its path while falling through the hole in the disk and is the cause of the pellet's positioning fluctuation.
Channel boring
The laser-irradiated pellets fall down into the collecting box. Figure 3(a) is a microscope image of a pellet after irradiation. Figure 3(b) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the focal point. To observe the channel, we cut one bead into two hemispheres in two ways: one perpendicular to the laser axis (A-A cross section in (a)), as shown in the SEM image of Figure 3(c) and one along the axis (B-B cross section), as shown in the SEM image of Figure 3(d). The hole through the bead can be observed in Figure 3(d). The inset image shows a visible light image of the same bead. The black line is the channel. The laser light, having an intensity of 4.7 × 1018 W/cm2, appears to bore from both sides through the bead and form a channel. From Figures 4(c) and (d), we can see that a hole pierces through the pellet. The radius of the hole is 10 μm, which is smaller than the laser focal point size of 13 μm.
Discussion
One possible explanation about channel boring is as follows: The laser pulse, before the main pulse, has a pre-pulse and pedestal components. The intensity of the main pulse is 4.7 × 1018 W/cm2 and we estimated that the pre-pulse component has an intensity of 5 × 1011 W/cm2 and 1 ns duration2. These pre-pulse and pedestal components propagate in the pellet till the electron density reaches the critical density. If these energies are absorbed by the pellet due to the multi-photon ionization, free-electrons are generated in the pellet along the propagation path of the pre-pulse and pedestal components. These free-electrons might work as a guiding wire for the fast-electrons generated by the main high intensity pulse. When the fast-electrons propagate along the free-electron wire, a return current flows that leads to the current-neutrality in the pellet. Consequently, the return current heats the pellet along the free electron path by the ohmic heating. The heating energy is enough to give thermal loads to the pellet and to create the hole inside the pellet. When a stainless steel (SUS) disk was attached to support a bead, as in Ref. 12, we did not observe any hole boring nor traces, except a burn-trace like line in the visible light image in Figure 3(g). In this condition, the steel mainly works as an electron source and it provides a large return current along the path deviated from the free-electron wire. As the result, the ohmic heat along the free-electron wire is reduced.
Although the mechanism of formation of channel through the 1-mm CD bead is not clear, an areal density of the channel area attains 100 mg/cm2 (1-mm length × 1.1 g/cm3 density), which is close to α burning range of 300 mg/cm2 in a DT fuel fusion16. It can be used as evidence that an ultra-intense laser can bore through the overdense region and support a hot electron transport to the core plasma, resulting in fast ignition17,18.
In the fast-ignition scenario of inertial confinement fusion, a DT capsule, pre-imploded to an isochoric condition17, is irradiated with a high intensity laser pulse. The intense laser is expected to transport sufficient energy along the path from the focal point to the core. We conceived this idea of hole boring, as a means for obtaining a clean path from the focal point to the core. The hole boring observed in this experiment can be applied for the fast-ignition. From the hot spot, the D(t,n)4He reaction produces 4He nuclei (3.6 MeV α particles), which penetrate and deposit their energy into the cold and dense fuel, that is, the burning wave spreads from the hot spot to the entire core. α burning in the core plasma is to occur as long as its areal density is 300 mg/cm2.
Methods
Figure 4 shows the pellet injector, installed in the illumination chamber, which is evacuated to 2.6 × 10−3 Pa. The pellet is a spherical CD bead with a diameter of 970 ± 2.7 μm and a sphericity of 99%. A pellet loader stores more than 10,000 CD pellets at a time. The pellets in the loader made to free-fall in gravity onto a rotating disk, which is 110 mm in diameter and rotates at 6 rpm. Each pellet on the disk is conveyed to an exit hole and falls along a parabolic trajectory to the laser focal point 18 cm below. The exit hole is shaped as an ellipse with major and minor axes of 4.0 and 2.0 mm, respectively and a depth of 8.0 mm. The focal point is irradiated by two counter laser beams at 1 Hz. The signals from the two photodiodes at 60 mm and 100 mm above the focal point are sequentially sent to a laser controller, which forecasts the arrival time at the focal point and sends a shooting-request signal to the HAMA laser appropriately. As soon as HAMA receives the signal, its two laser beams engage the injected pellet with an appropriate delay time. Symmetric counter laser beam irradiation induces implosive fusion18. The laser energy, pulse duration and wavelength are 0.63 J per beam, 104 fs and 811 nm, respectively and the intensity is 4.7 × 1018 W/cm2 (Supplementary Table 1).
References
Hogan, W. J. Energy from Inertial Fusion Ch. 3 IFE Power plant design principles. (edited by Hogan W. J., IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1995).
Kitagawa, Y. et al. Efficient fusion neutron generation using a 10-TW high-repetition rate diode-pumped laser. Plasma and Fusion Research Letters 6, 1306006 (2011).
Norimatu, T., Endo, T., Yoshida, H. & Iwamoto, A. Design of target fabrication and injection System. Journal of Plasma and Fusion Research 82, 829–835(2006).
Norimatu, T., Sunahara, A., Nagai, K. & Yamanaka, T. Influence of residual gas on the life of cryogenic target and trajectory of injected targets. Fusion Technology 38, 28–33 (2000).
Yoshida, H. & Yamahira, Y. Optimization and evaluation of coil gun as a target injector for laser fusion. Review Laser Eng. 32, 343–347(2005).
Petzoldt, R. W., Goodin, D. & Siegel, N. Status of target injection and tracking studies for inertial energy. Fusion Technology 38, 22–27 (2000).
Petzoldt, R. W. et al. Experimental target injection and tracking system. General Atomic Report, GA-A24200 (2003).
Petzoldt, R. W., Valmianski, E. I., Carlson, L. & Huynh, P. Target injection placement accuracy improvement with electrostatic steering. General Atomic Report, GA-A25685.
Kalal, M., Slezak, O. & Martinkova, M. SBS PCM technique applied for aiming at IFE pellets. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 56, 184–189 (2010).
Carlson, L. et al. Completing the viability demonstration of direct-drive inertial fusion energy target engagement. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 38.3, 300–305 (2010).
Mori, Y. et al. 1-Hz fast-heating fusion driver HAMA pumped by a 10-J green diode-pumped solid-state laser. Nuclear Fusion 53, 073011 (2013).
Komeda, O. et al. Neutron generator using a spherical target irradiated with ultra-intense diode-pumped laser at 1.25 Hz. Fusion Science and Technology 63, 263–300 (2013).
Mori, Y. et al. Head-on inverse compton scattering X-rays with energy beyond 10 keV from laser-accelerated quasi-monoenergetic electron bunches. Applied Physics Express 5, 056401 (2012).
Sato, T. et al. Particle and heavy ion transport code system PHITS, Version 2.52. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 50.9, 913–923 (2013).
Komeda, O. et al. Target injection and engagement for neutron generation at 1 Hz. Plasma and Fusion Research Rapid Communication 8, 1205020 (2013).
Atzeni, S. & Meyer-ter-vehn, J. The Physics for Inertial Fusion, Beam Plasma Interaction, Hydrodynamics, Hot Dense Matter (Oxford Science Publications, 2004).
Tabak, M. et al. Ignition and high gain with ultrapowerful lasers. Physics of Plasmas 1, 1626–1635 (1994).
Kitagawa, Y. et al. Fusion using fast heating of a compactly imploded CD Core. Physical Review Letters 108, 155001 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge all of the laser construction and operation teams of Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. and the pellet injection system construction teams of Toyota Technical Development Corp. We also thank Ms. Suita of GPI for providing the pellets.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.K. supervised the study and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. O.K. and Y.K. wrote the main manuscript. Y.N. and K.I. prepared Figure 1. Y.M. and T.S. developed the HAMA laser and prepared Supplementary Table 1. R.H. acquired the experimental neutron data of Figure 2 and advised the simulation method for Supplementary Fig. 1. Y.N. supported to acquire the target placement data for Supplementary Fig. 2. S.N. and M.K. supported to adjust the target engagement. N.S. prepared CD pellets. A.S. advised the channel boring theory and provided the discussion part of the manuscript. T.K. (three persons), H.K., N.N., M.F., H.A., T.M., T.H., Y.S. and E.M. gave scientific advice and contributed to discussion and reviewed the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information
Supporting Information
Supplementary Information
Video of the repeating pellet engagement.
Supplementary Information
Snapshots of the repeating pellet engagement.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Komeda, O., Nishimura, Y., Mori, Y. et al. First demonstration of laser engagement of 1-Hz-injected flying pellets and neutron generation. Sci Rep 3, 2561 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02561
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02561
This article is cited by
-
Plasma density limits for hole boring by intense laser pulses
Nature Communications (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.