To study the role of surface temperature as an adjunct to motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in rabbit spinal cord injury (SCI) model.
Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Rabbits (n=18) were divided into Complete (n=9) and Incomplete (n=9) SCI groups. Complete SCI was defined as being non-responsive to a wake-up test with loss of MEPs after transection of spinal cord. Incomplete SCI was defined as being responsive to a wake-up test with significant attenuation (⩾80%) of MEPs after impaction on spinal cord. Surface temperature of upper and lower extremities, core temperature and MEPs signals were checked before, during and after SCI for 20 min. A wake-up test was conducted and spinal cord was histologicaly evaluated.
Experimental conditions between the two groups were statistically similar (P>0.005 for all values). After SCI, upper extremity temperatures did not change in either group (P>0.005); however, the surface temperature of the lower extremities in the Complete SCI Group elevated to 1.7±0.5 °C in comparison to 0.5±0.1 °C in the Incomplete SCI Group (P<0.001). The scores of wake-up test in the Incomplete SCI Group were significantly different from that of the Complete SCI Group (P<0.001), while white and gray matter damage was variable on histology.
Monitoring of changes of body surface temperature of the lower extremities can be potentially used to identify the completeness of SCI in a rabbit model.
The recent advances in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring have come as a boon to spine surgeons, by adding strength to our ability to deal with complex spine pathologies such as deformities and tumors.1 Motor evoked potential (MEP) has been widely used as an intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring system. It measures the real-time electrical activity of the spinal cord during spine surgeries, in which spinal cord injury (SCI) may occur. Despite their popularity, its utility is limited by several factors such as the likelihood of false-negative and false-positive results, age of the patient, type of diseases and surgical procedures, electronic equipment and type of anesthesia.2, 3, 4 Moreover, MEP signals have been known to disappear even with trivial trauma that is insufficient to cause clinically significant SCI. Also, MEP monitoring cannot predict the depth of SCI (complete or incomplete), based on the amount of decrement in amplitude. These shortfalls of MEP monitoring can make spine surgeons not to assess the status of the spinal cord, which is crucial for the intraoperative decisions for surgical treatment.
To overcome the shortfalls of MEP monitoring, wake-up test still continue to serve as useful adjunct.1 However, the wake-up test significantly distresses the patient both physically and psychologically. In view of anesthetists, it is technically difficult to perform. Therefore, it cannot be performed as frequently as the surgeon wishes to. Such disadvantages render it clinically unfavorable and support the use of MEP. Meanwhile, the authors have observed intraoperative surface temperature changes in the lower limb, in response to the SCI, during spinal deformity corrections and tumor resections.
Therefore, in this study, body surface temperature was hypothesized as a modality that indicates the completeness of SCI, since it is known to change in response to SCI as a result of autonomic dysfunction. With this in the background, the role of monitoring temperature changes of the lower extremity was evaluated, as an ancillary tool to MEP for assessing the extent of SCI during spine surgeries.
Materials and methods
This study was performed under the approval of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (KU12129). Thirty-five 3-month-old male New Zealand white breed rabbits weighing ~3 kg were used, due to their proper size, and as they are easy to handle, and house bred. Furthermore, it is a well-established model that is well recognized by the scientific and regulatory communities. Three-month-old male rabbits are considered equivalent to a 20-year-old human. Considering the susceptibility and the physiologic influence during changing rabbit warren, a 10-day period of adjustment was provided prior to the start of the experiment.
Rabbits were divided into a Complete SCI group (14 cases) and an Incomplete SCI Group (21 cases). The Complete SCI Group was defined as following: complete loss of MEP signal, no spontaneous response on wake-up test and no response to Von Frey monofilament test (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL, USA) under 180 g of pressure on arousal.5, 6 The Incomplete SCI Group was defined as following: attenuation of MEPs signal amplitude by >80% compared with baseline potential, spontaneous response of lower extremities on wake-up test and response under Von Frey monofilament test at 180 g of pressure.5, 6 Considering the shortcoming of a single monitoring with muscular MEP, such as instability and high sensitivity of baseline amplitude, the amplitude of MEP in subjects was measured at 3-min intervals.7 If there were any recovery of MEP amplitude, the subject was excluded from the Incomplete group, as well as from this study. For the assessment of the wake-up test, anesthesia was discontinued until the return of free movements of the head and stable vital signs. Subsequently, threatening hand movements were exposed in front of the subject’s eyes three times at 3-min intervals. If the subject failed to show any movement in the hind foot, it was recorded as positive. For the Von Frey monofilament test, 180 g Von Frey monofilament was applied five times perpendicularly to the underside of the paw of each animal for 2–3 s. Response to weight more than three out of five times was recorded as positive.8
Anesthesia and MEP application
The experiment was conducted on each rabbit on a prone position. A vascular catheter was placed in the left ear vein followed by an induction and maintenance (12–20 mg kg−1 h−1) using intravenous anesthetics (Propofol, Astra-Zeneca, Luton, UK). Oxygen saturation, pulse rate, arterial blood pressure (artery of the contralateral ear), CO2 partial pressure and core temperature were measured using a 5/S Avance anesthesia device (Datex- Ohmeda, Madison, WI, USA) (Figure 1). The core temperature was measured at rectum 30-cm deep into the anus using a flexible thermometer (General-Purpose Temperature Probe; DeRoyal Industries Inc, Powell, TN, USA). Following the anesthesia, MEP monitoring equipment (Nims Spine System, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN, USA) providing a constant current stimulus that is set to 250 μs of pulse width, 4 ms of inter-stimulus interval and 5-Hz repetition rate was installed.7 Stimulators of MEPs were placed on the rabbit’s head (forehead and mandible) and needles as input devices were inserted at >3-cm apart on the Rectus femoris muscles (Figure 2).9 A biphasic square pulse wave was used as the input signal. Stimulus was started at 20 mA and was gradually increased to 60 mA by increments of 10 mA. The upper limit was set at 60 mA to avoid possible side effects.10 When proper signals were obtained, it was measured three times at 3-min intervals and the mean value measured was recorded as baseline potential.9
Measurement of body surface temperature
Considering the susceptibility of body surface temperature to laboratory temperature and humidity, they were maintained at 24 °C and 40%, respectively, with a single separated air conditioning device (with 2 °C and 10% error margin). Sensors for the body surface temperature were inserted subdermally. Body surface temperature was measured behind the calves and anterior elbows for the lower and the upper extremities, respectively.
Temperature sensors (SENTECH, Seoul, Korea), with measurement range of −200 to 500 °C, that can detect a change of temperature as little as one decimal place with accuracy of ±0.15 °C (Figure 3) were used. Body surface temperature was measured 10 times at an interval of 30 s for 5 min prior to the experiment. The average temperature was defined as the baseline temperature before the experiment.
SCI model preparation
The T7-8 vertebral junction was selected as the site of injury, as SCI in this region can lead to autonomic dysfunction without affecting the cardio-vascular function, which may influence signals of transcranial electrical stimulation-motor evoked potential (TES-MEP) by altering the blood pressure.11 The location of the T7-8 vertebral junction was confirmed using mobile radiography equipment (C-arm) or general radiography equipment (Figure 4). Different methods of spinal cord damage were used for each SCI groups, to clearly categorize the SCI groups and to avoid errors that may arise from the spinal shock. For the Incomplete SCI Group, weight drop method was used to create injury, as it exhibits similar mechanism to the injury seen in clinical situations.12 Conversely, since SCI created by weight drop method preserved conductive function,13 for the complete SCI model the spinal cord was completely transected to eliminate voluntary movements. For the incomplete injury created by impaction weight drop, the outer cortex of the lamina of T7-8 was ground using a motorized drill leaving a paper-thin lamina. Subsequently, a 9.5-g-weighted iron pendulum, 12 mm in diameter (Shinwoo Company, Inchun, Korea) was impacted. The magnitude of impact was adjusted by changing the height of the pendulum. Originally, the amount of impact was determined based on the previous study by Reece TB et al.,14 who developed a 10 g weight drop from a height of 60 mm (Figure 4). However, in our experiment it was difficult to reproduce consistent incomplete SCI, due to variable impact or individual differences on resistance of the cord to the impact. Therefore, impact force was reduced by half by dropping the pendulum from a 30-mm height after completely exposing the spinal cord without lamina. After the impaction on the cord, MEP and wake-up tests were subsequently done. Thereafter, to rule out spinal shock in Incomplete SCI Group, the animal that did not present any decrease in MEP signal by >80% or not showing any response to the wake-up test was excluded from the experiment.
The procedure for complete SCI was as follows: laminae of T7-8 were completely removed using a motorized drill and a 1-mm Kerrison punch (Aesculap, Inc., Center Valley, PA, USA) under MEP neuromonitoring throughout the entire process. After the exposure of the spinal cord, the body surface temperature was measured. If the temperature difference was higher than 2 °C in comparison to the baseline, temperature was measured an additional four times at 5-min intervals. If the difference of temperature in additional measurements continued to be >2 °C, the subject animal was excluded from the experiment, as the previous study suggested that the temperature difference of 2 °C was a sign of homeostasis breakdown.15 A complete transection of the spinal cord was made using a number 15 scalpel. The MEP was measured immediately after the transection of the spinal cord and was measured five times in 3-min intervals.
After a complete or an incomplete SCI, body surface temperature was measured 60 times in 20 min with 20-s intervals. Motor function of the lower extremities was assessed with the wake-up test. After the experiment, to uniformly and easily assess the post injury motor function in all experimental cases, a modified Tarlov and BBB scale (Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan Locomotor Rating Scale) was applied.16, 17 A score of 2 points was given in case of spontaneous movement; 1 point was given if movement was observed during the Von Frey filament test; and 0 points were given if no movement was observed (Figure 5). Due to ethical problems according to regulation guidelines of the IACUC, biological weakness of rabbit after the experiment and limitation of experiment budget, clinical observation was done only on acute state after wakeup. After the completion of the experiment, the spinal cord was extracted 1cm above and below the impacted area, followed by the fixation of the specimen with formalin solution. Histological evaluation was only done in the Incomplete SCI Group. By contrast, it was not done in the Complete SCI Group as the spinal cord was definitely transected in the latter group. The harvested spinal cord was dyed with Luxor fast blue and hematoxylin and eosin (both purchased from EMD Chemical Ltd, Philadelphia, PA, USA). Histological analysis was carried out with an axial slice along the damaged spinal cord portion and the extent of injury was observed.
A Mann–Whitney U-test, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a Friedman test were used for non-parametric comparative analysis of average values, as described in Tables 1, 2 and 3. For the statistical analysis, SPSS software (version 18.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Owing to the small sample size, statistical values were re-verified using the G-power 3.1 program.18 If the power of a statistical value was >0.8, it was considered highly significant. The statistical results were described with P-values (power of statistical results).
Seventeen subjects were excluded from the experiment due to the accidental SCI during the surgical procedure, dissipation of evoked potential, or errors in measuring position or the death of the animal. The Complete and the Incomplete SCI Groups consisted of nine cases each. Laboratory temperatures were 22.9±1.1 °C; and the humidity was 44.8±2.7%; oxygen saturation values were 99.1±0.8% and 98.7±1.1% before and after the experiment, respectively. Systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure before the experiment were 85.1±2.3 mm Hg and 60.8±7.6 mm Hg, respectively, and after the experiment 84.7±1.5 mmHg and 60.8±3.4 mm Hg, respectively. Carbon dioxide concentration was measured as 36.9±1.8 before and 36.9±2 after the experiment. The core temperature was measured as 38.3±0.8 °C before the experiment, 38.3± 0.7 °C after the impact and 38.3±0.7 °C after the experiment. Tables 1 and 2 depict the experimental data of each animal.
Change in body surface temperature associated with SCI
All cases of the Complete SCI Group demonstrated an increase in surface body temperature after the transection of the spinal cord, with mean magnitude change of 1.7±0.5 °C in the lower extremities (1.7±0.4 °C on the right and 1.7±0.7 °C on the left side) and 0.4±0.1 °C in upper extremities (0.4±0.2 °C on the right upper and 0.4±0.1 °C on the left upper extremity). The mean change in core temperature was 0.2±0.1 °C. Statistically, the magnitude of temperature change in the lower extremities was significantly different from the temperature changes of the upper extremities and core temperature (P=0.004 (1.00) and P=0.002 (1.00), respectively) (Figure 6a).
By contrast, the Incomplete SCI Group did not show any increase in temperature of the lower extremities in any cases. After the impact, the mean magnitude of temperature change in the lower extremities was 0.5±0.1 °C (right side 0.5±0.2 °C and left side 0.6±0.2 °C) and 0.6±0.2 °C in upper extremities (0.5±0.2 °C on the right upper and 0.7±0.2 °C on the left upper side). The magnitude of the core temperature change after the impact was 0.2±0.1 °C. Statistically, there was no significant difference between the lower and upper extremities (P=0.316); however, the degree of temperature change in lower extremities was significantly different from that of core temperature (P=0.007).
Comparison between Complete and Incomplete SCI Groups on the wake-up test
There was no response during the wake-up test in the Complete SCI Group, and results were consistent with MEP results. The Incomplete SCI Group demonstrated a decrease in MEP signal by >80% in all cases; however, animals in this group showed responses to the wake-up test, although their responses were variable. The comparison between the groups is shown in Table 3.
In all cases of incomplete SCI, edema and subdural hematoma were observed macroscopically after SCI (Figure 7a). A varying range of spotting hemorrhage was observed in the central canal. However, definitive breakage of neural tissue at the ventral horn, where the autonomous nervous system is located, was not observed. The extent of damage of the white matter in the axial slice also varied, showing vacuoles and breaks in the connection between neural cells in the area of the lateral column (where the cortico-spinal tract is located) (Figure 7). Nevertheless, the amount and location of neural tissue damage were inconsistent. Since the duration of monitoring was <48 h, inflammatory cells were not observed around the hematoma.19
Our results indicate that there is a relationship between complete SCI and body surface temperature. This finding can be applied to aid the MEP monitoring as an ancillary measurement. Although, the major monitoring modality to indicate intraoperative SCI nowadays is TES-MEP, because of its proven accuracy and relatively continuous monitoring of motor nerves its use is limited by the complexity of pathophysiologic mechanisms of SCI, as indicated by false-positive and false-negative results. Furthermore, such limitations can cause uncertainties during spine surgeries, which interfere with important intraoperative decisions. Therefore, combining different monitoring techniques was necessary to appropriately define the intraoperative insult. As our research have suggested, body surface temperature change may aid in maximizing the benefits of MEP by overcoming the limitations, such as the inability to differentiate between simple concussion and severe irreversible neurological damage. This hypothesis was based on the fact that the surface temperature of the lower extremities elevates after SCI due to the damage in the descending pathway coming from the supraspinal center leading to sympathetic hypoactivity and vasodilatation.20 This possibility has been previously explored by Roehl K et al.,21 who measured the temperatures of the skin, and compared the injured dermatome with the dermatomes of intact spinal cord in SCI patients and reported that differences in surface temperature changes could be used to evaluate the level of SCI.
In our study, in the Incomplete SCI Group, the surface temperature of lower extremities elevated from 33.4 to 35.1 °C (mean value of change: 1.7±0.5 °C). Considering the strict homeostatic temperature control in mammals, this is regarded as abnormal. Surface temperature in the lower extremities changed significantly compared with that of the upper extremities and core temperature (P=0.004 and 0.002, respectively) (Figure 6a). This result is similar to a previous study that used the transected spinal cord on mouse model, which reported a 5.6 °C and 4.0 °C of temperature rise on the surface of the lower extremities and tail, respectively, for 5 days after SCI.11 Decreased cutaneous vasoconstrictor tone was suggested as the cause. In our study, the surface temperature of extremities elevated after complete SCI. However, in the Incomplete SCI Group, the surface temperature of the lower extremities changed from 34.9 to 35.4 °C, which is not statistically different from the temperature change of the upper extremities (P=0.316) (Figure 6b). Although, there was a statistical difference between the change in core temperature (0.2 °C) and that of the lower extremities (0.5 °C), this was thought to be insignificant, as it was within the normal range.
When the Complete and Incomplete SCI Groups were compared, the only differences found were the change in temperature in lower extremities and wake-up test score (Table 3). Considering minimal differences in biological and environmental conditions and in neurophysiologic states (that is, SCI on MEPs) between two groups, it can be assumed that the change in temperature in lower extremity mirrors the result of the wake-up tests after Complete and Incomplete SCI.
Histologicaly, the Incomplete SCI Group showed epidural hemorrhage in all cases (Figure 7) with varying amount and extent of hemorrhage in white and gray matter. Punctuate hemorrhage was found in all cases around the central canal and it spread out in the form of spokes of a wheel in the gray matter, although no definite neuronal injury was observed at ventral horn of gray matter. These findings were consistent with previous studies, which observed diffuse hemorrhage in gray matter in incompletely paralyzed subjects caused by weight drop impact.19 However, the authors did not see the disappearance of a large number of nerve cells in gray matter in incompletely paralyzed cases, that is, the Incomplete SCI Group (Figure 7), which was thought to be the factor that maintained the temperature of lower extremities. In white matter, a varying amount of linear breakage of neuronal connective tissue of the lateral funiculus was observed. It was assumed as the cause of loss of MEP signal and the unresponsiveness to the wake-up test or Von Frey filament stimulation in the Incomplete SCI Group.
The limitations of this study are as follows: (1) the extent of autonomic dysfunction differs depending on the injured level of spine that can have an influence on surface temperature. Thus, temperature changes following spinal injury at various levels need to be confirmed. Also it would not be possible to measure a temperature change of 1.7 °C in a routine surgical practice by currently available methods. However, recently Roehl et al.21 established measurements of small increments in temperatures with the help of modern thermal cameras. The authors were also able to establish the level of paralysis and the neurological border between sensitive and non-sensitive body areas of 16 paralyzed patients. (2) To avoid analytical errors due to spinal shock that may occur during cord impact, different mechanism to produce SCI was used for each group. For the development of complete SCI, a cord transection method was used, instead of the weight drop method that was used for incomplete SCI. However, signs of spinal shock or effects on surface temperature following spinal shock as a result of using two separate methods to produce complete and incomplete SCI were not observed. (3) The controlled laboratory environment of the study is not akin to a clinical (intraoperative) situation, as many factors such as temperature and humidity cannot be kept constant in a clinical situation. (4) As scoring system for the locomotor evaluation of experimental animal was simplified and modified, and not subdivided into many levels, surface temperature change could not be evaluated according to the severity of the SCI.22 However, as the study aims to find the presence of a relationship between the SCI and change in surface temperature of lower extremity as a comprehensive preliminary study, more simple and concise scoring system was considered more appropriate, and therefore, used.
In summary, body surface temperature changes were found to be useful for assessing the completeness of cord injury in a rabbit SCI model. Exploration by further animal and clinical studies may help in ascertaining its role in optimization of the diagnostic efficacy of multimodal neuromonitoring for detection of impending neural injury.
Malhotra NR, Shaffrey CI . Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring in spine surgery. Spine 2010; 35: 2167–2179.
Balvin MJ, Song KM, Slimp JC . Effects of anesthetic regimens and other confounding factors affecting the interpretation of motor evoked potentials during pediatric spine surgery. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol 2010; 50: 219–244.
Hong JY, Suh SW, Modi HN, Hur CY, Song HR, Park JH . False negative and positive motor evoked potentials in one patient: is single motor evoked potential monitoring reliable method? A case report and literature review. Spine 2010; 35: E912–E916.
Modi HN, Suh SW, Yang JH, Yoon JY . False-negative transcranial motor-evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery causing paralysis: a case report with literature review. Spine 2009; 34: E896–E900.
Bridwell KH, Dewald RL . The Textbook of Spinal Surgery, 3rd edn Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health: Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2011.
Langeloo DD, Journee HL, de Kleuver M, Grotenhuis JA . Criteria for transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal deformity surgery A review and discussion of the literature. Neurophysiol Clin 2007; 37: 431–439.
Niederhofer H . Effectiveness of the repetitive Transcranical Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) of 1Hz for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Psychiatr Danub 2008; 20: 91–92.
Meert TF, Vermeirsch HA . A preclinical comparison between different opioids: antinociceptive versus adverse effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2005; 80: 309–326.
Kinoshita H, Yahagi S, Kasai T . Preparatory suppression of the human primary motor cortex induced by repetition of simple and choice reaction time tasks: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Res 2007; 1184: 132–140.
MacDonald DB . Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 19: 416–429.
Laird AS, Carrive P, Waite PM . Cardiovascular and temperature changes in spinal cord injured rats at rest and during autonomic dysreflexia. J Physiol 2006; 577: 539–548.
Metz GA, Curt A, van de Meent H, Klusman I, Schwab ME, Dietz V . Validation of the weight-drop contusion model in rats: a comparative study of human spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17: 1–17.
Yu K, Li J, Jia L, Bao J, Yuan W, Ye T et al. [The effects of graded spinal cord injuries on transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potentials in the rat]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 1998; 36: 417–420.
Reece TB, Davis JD, Okonkwo DO, Maxey TS, Ellman PI, Li X et al. Adenosine A2A analogue reduces long-term neurologic injury after blunt spinal trauma. J Surg Res 2004; 121: 130–134.
Docherty B, Foudy C . Homeostasis part 3: temperature regulation. Nurs Times 2006; 102: 20–21.
Tarlov IM, Klinger H . Spinal cord compression studies. II. Time limits for recovery after acute compression in dogs. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1954; 71: 271–290.
Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC . Graded histological and locomotor outcomes after spinal cord contusion using the NYU weight-drop device versus transection. Exp Neurol 1996; 139: 244–256.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Beh Res Methods 2009; 41: 1149–1160.
White RJ . Pathology of spinal cord injury in experimental lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975; 112: 16–26.
Popa C, Popa F, Grigorean VT, Onose G, Sandu AM, Popescu M et al. Vascular dysfunctions following spinal cord injury. J Med Life 2010; 3: 275–285.
Roehl K, Becker S, Fuhrmeister C, Teuscher N, Futing M, Heilmann A . New, non-invasive thermographic examination of body surface temperature on tetraplegic and paraplegic patients, as a supplement to existing diagnostic measures. Spinal Cord 2009; 47: 492–495.
Onifer SM, Rabchevsky AG, Scheff SW . Rat models of traumatic spinal cord injury to assess motor recovery. ILAR J 2007; 48: 385–395.
This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI11C0388). This study was performed under the approval of the IACUC (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, KU12129). All experimental procedures, protocols and treatment of experimental animals were performed under the control of the IACUC. This study was performed in the Korea University Guro Hospital.
SWS carried out the arrangement of the enrolled patients and drafted the manuscript as an assistant of JHY. YSP participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis as an assistant of JHY. SWS carried out the arrangement of the enrolled patients and drafted the manuscript as an assistant of JHY. J-HL and BKP participated in the design of the study. CHH participated in the design and revision work of the study. JHY participated in the design of the study, statistical analysis and coordination, and drafted the manuscript as the main author. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, J., Suh, S., Park, YS. et al. Change in body surface temperature as an ancillary measurement to motor evoked potentials. Spinal Cord 53, 827–834 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.90