Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Disentangling sex differences in PTSD risk factors

Abstract

Despite extensive research on sex/gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Here we present a systematic overview of three sex/gender-related risk pathways. We assessed 16 risk factors as well as 3 month PTSD severity in a prospective cohort study (n = 2924) of acutely traumatized individuals and investigated potential mediators in the pathway between sex assigned at birth and PTSD severity using multiple mediation analysis with regularization. Six risk factors were more prevalent/severe in women, and none was more pronounced in men. Analyses showed that acute stress disorder, neuroticism, lifetime sexual assault exposure, anxiety sensitivity and pretrauma anxiety symptoms fully mediated and uniquely contributed to the relationship between sex assigned at birth and PTSD severity. Our results demonstrate different risk mechanisms for women and men. Such knowledge can inform targeted interventions. Our systematic approach to differential risk pathways can be transferred to other mental disorders to guide sex- and gender-sensitive mental health research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Possible pathways of how risk factors can contribute to sex differences in PTSD.
Fig. 2: Flowchart of AURORA participants included in the present analysis.
Fig. 3: Multiple mediation model for PTSD severity comparing female and male participants.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and/or research tools used in the preparation of this manuscript were obtained from the NDA. The NDA is a collaborative informatics system created by the National Institutes of Health to provide a national resource to support and accelerate research in mental health. Dataset identifier(s) at the NDA Digital Object identifier via https://doi.org/10.15154/c01s-jy79 (ref. 55). This manuscript reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or of the submitters submitting original data to NDA.

Code Availability

An R-based html markup document, which reproduces our analyses and results, is publicly available in a public OSF repository at https://osf.io/v3euk/ (ref. 54).

References

  1. McCall-Hosenfeld, J. S., Mukherjee, S. & Lehman, E. B. The prevalence and correlates of lifetime psychiatric disorders and trauma exposures in urban and rural settings: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). PLoS ONE 9, e112416 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Seedat, S. et al. Cross-national associations between gender and mental disorders in the World Health Organization world mental health surveys. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 66, 785–795 (2009).

  3. Haering, S. et al. Higher risk—less data: challenges to sex and gender considerations in trauma research. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science (in the press).

  4. Kessler, R. C., Sonnega, A., Bromet, E. J., Hughes, M. & Nelson, C. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 52, 1048–1060 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tolin, D. F. & Foa, E. B. Sex differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder: a quantitative review of 25 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 132, 959–992 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christiansen, D. M., McCarthy, M. M. & Seeman, M. V. Where sex meets gender: how sex and gender come together to cause sex differences in mental illness. Front. Psychiatry 13, 856436 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rechlin, R. K., Splinter, T. F. L., Hodges, T. E., Albert, A. Y. & Galea, L. A. M. An analysis of neuroscience and psychiatry papers published from 2009 and 2019 outlines opportunities for increasing discovery of sex differences. Nat. Commun. 13, 2137 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schiebinger, L. & Schraudner, M. Interdisciplinary approaches to achieving gendered innovations in science, medicine, and engineering. Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 36, 154–167 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tannenbaum, C., Ellis, R. P., Eyssel, F., Zou, J. & Schiebinger, L. Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature 575, 137–146 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Duffy, K. A. & Epperson, C. N. Evaluating the evidence for sex differences: a scoping review of human neuroimaging in psychopharmacology research. Neuropsychopharmacology 47, 430–443 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Sifuentes, Y. & Maney, D. L. Reporting and misreporting of sex differences in the biological sciences. eLife 10, e70817 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Haering, S. et al. Sex-dependent differences in vulnerability to early risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: Results from the AURORA study. Preprint at Open Science Framework https://osf.io/57vjw (2023).

  13. Stranges, T. N., Namchuk, A. B., Splinter, T. F. L, Moore, K. N., & Galea, L. A. Are we moving the dial? Canadian health research funding trends for women’s health, 2S/LGBTQ + health, sex, or gender considerations. Biol. Sex Differ. 14, 40 (2023).

  14. Becker, J. B. & Koob, G. F. Sex differences in animal models: focus on addiction. Pharmacol. Rev. 68, 242–263 (2016).

  15. Christiansen, D. M. Sex differences in PTSD: mediation and moderation effects. in Comprehensive Guide to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders, Ch. 82 (eds Martin, C. R., Preedy, V. R. & Patel, V. B.) 1465–1481 (Springer, 2016).

  16. Goldstein, J. M., Cherkerzian, S., Tsuang, M. T. & Petryshen, T. L. Sex differences in the genetic risk for schizophrenia: history of the evidence for sex-specific and sex-dependent effects. Am. J. Med. Genet. 162, 698–710 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McKenzie-McHarg, K. et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth: an update of current issues and recommendations for future research. J Reprod. Infant Psychol. 33, 219–237 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bryant, R. A. et al. The association between menstrual cycle and traumatic memories. J. Affect. Disord. 131, 398–401 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gibson, C. J. et al. Associations of intimate partner violence, sexual assault, and posttraumatic stress disorder with menopause symptoms among midlife and older women. JAMA Intern. Med. 179, 80–87 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravi, M., Stevens, J. S. & Michopoulos, V. Neuroendocrine pathways underlying risk and resilience to PTSD in women. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 55, 100790 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ravi, M., Bernabe, B. & Michopoulos, V. Stress-related mental health disorders and inflammation in pregnancy: the current landscape and the need for further investigation. Front. Psychiatry 13, 868936 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rowland, G. E. et al. Distinctive impacts of sexual trauma versus non-sexual trauma on PTSD profiles in highly trauma-exposed, Black women. J. Affect. Disord. 317, 329–338 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahern, J. et al. Gender, social support, and posttraumatic stress in postwar Kosovo. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 192, 762–770 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Andrews, B., Brewin, C. R. & Rose, S. Gender, social support, and PTSD in victims of violent crime. Journal of Traumatic Stress 16, 421–427 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Christiansen, D. M. & Elklit, A. in Post Traumatic Stress Disorders in a Global Context (ed. Ovuga, E.) 113–142 (InTech, 2012).

  26. Haering, S., Stevens, J. S. & Powers, A. Gender-Based Analysis of PTSD Risk Factors in the AURORA Study (AURORA Executive Committee at the University North Carolina, 2022).

  27. Altemus, M., Sarvaiya, N. & Neill Epperson, C. Sex differences in anxiety and depression clinical perspectives. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 35, 320–330 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Boisclair Demarble, J., Fortin, C., D’Antono, B. & Guay, S. Gender differences in the prediction of acute stress disorder from peritraumatic dissociation and distress among victims of violent crimes. J. Interpers. Violence 35, 1229–1250 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bryant, R. A. & Harvey, A. G. Gender differences in the relationship between acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder following motor vehicle accidents. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 37, 226–229 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lippa, R. A. Gender differences in personality and interests: when, where, and why? Gender differences in personality and interests. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 4, 1098–1110 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Olatunji, B. O. & Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B. Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychol. Bull. 135, 974–999 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Christiansen, D. M. & Hansen, M. Accounting for sex differences in PTSD: a multi-variable mediation model. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 6, 26068 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 879–891 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stein, M. B., Walker, J. R. & Forde, D. R. Gender differences in susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder. Behav. Res. Ther. 38, 619–628 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rowland, G. E. et al. Prior sexual trauma exposure impacts posttraumatic dysfunction and neural circuitry following a recent traumatic event in the AURORA study. Biol. Psychiatry Glob. Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.02.004 (2023).

  36. Lilly, M. M., Pole, N., Best, S. R., Metzler, T. & Marmar, C. R. Gender and PTSD: what can we learn from female police officers? J. Anxiety Disord. 23, 767–774 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rothbaum, B. O. et al. Early intervention may prevent the development of posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized pilot civilian study with modified prolonged exposure. Biol. Psychiatry 72, 957–963 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Schultebraucks, K. et al. Development and validation of a brief screener for posttraumatic stress disorder risk in emergency medical settings. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2023.01.012 (2023).

  39. Wright, E. N., Anderson, J., Phillips, K. & Miyamoto, S. Help-seeking and barriers to care in intimate partner sexual violence: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838021998305 (2021).

  40. Lanius, R. A., Brand, B., Vermetten, E., Frewen, P. A. & Spiegel, D. The dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder: rationale, clinical and neurobiological evidence, and implications: dissociative subtype of PTSD. Depress. Anxiety 29, 701–708 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shaw, S. B. et al. Large-scale functional hyperconnectivity patterns in trauma-related dissociation: an rs-fMRI study of PTSD and its dissociative subtype. Nat. Ment. Health 1, 711–721 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry 9, 137–150 (2022).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. McLean, S. A. et al. The AURORA Study: a longitudinal, multimodal library of brain biology and function after traumatic stress exposure. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 283–296 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

  45. Cella, D. et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 63, 1179–1194 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Pilkonis, P. A. et al. Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment 18, 263–283 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. John, O., Naumann, L. & Soto, C. in Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (eds John, O., Robins, R. & Pervin, L.) 114–158 (The Guilford Press, 2008).

  48. Gray, M. J., Litz, B. T., Hsu, J. L. & Lombardo, T. W. Psychometric properties of the life events checklist. Assessment 11, 330–341 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Weathers, F. W., Blake, D., Schnurr, P. P. & Kaloupek, D. G. The life events checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/te-measures/life_events_checklist.asp (2013).

  50. Brunet, A. et al. The peritraumatic distress inventory: a proposed measure of PTSD criterion A2. Am. J. Psychiatry 158, 1480–1485 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Weathers, F. W. et al. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5. National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/adult-sr/ptsd-checklist.asp (2013).

  52. Dalenberg, C. & Carlson, E. Severity of dissociative symptoms—adult (Brief Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-B)—modified). American Psychiatric Association https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm/educational-resources/assessment-measures (2010).

  53. Serang, S., Jacobucci, R., Brimhall, K. C. & Grimm, K. J. Exploratory mediation analysis via regularization. Struct. Equ. Modeling 24, 733–744 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Haering, S., Stevens, J., Powers, A. Analysis code for 'Disentangling sex differences in PTSD risk factors' Open Science Framework https://osf.io/v3euk/ (2023).

  55. National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive, https://doi.org/10.15154/c01s-jy79 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

AURORA is supported by grant U01MH110925 from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) to S.A.M, R.C.K., K.C.K. and K.J.R., the US Army Medical Research and Material Command, the One Mind Foundation and The Mayday Fund. Verily Life Sciences and Mindstrong Health provided some of the hardware and software used to perform study assessments. S.H.’s time is supported by a PhD scholarship of ‘Stiftung der Deutschen Wirtschaft’ (to S.H.). The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors thank A. Williams, X. Yao and the other members of the University of North Carolina Institute for Trauma Recovery for their efforts and aide in this research. We also thank the research staff at McLean Hospital, Emory University, Temple University and Wayne State University for their efforts and aide. We further express our gratitude to the participants and their families for their willingness to participate in this research. The investigators wish to thank the trauma survivors participating in the AURORA study. Their time and effort during a challenging period of their lives make our efforts to improve recovery for future trauma survivors possible. This project was supported by the NIMH under U01MH110925, the US Army MRMC, One Mind and The Mayday Fund. The content is solely responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of any of the funders. Verily Life Sciences and Mindstrong Health provided some of the hardware and software used to perform study assessments. The Many Brains Project provided software for neurocognitive assessments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.A.M., R.C.K., K.C.K., S.H., A.P., J.S.S., A.V.S., S.D.L. and V.M. conceptualized the study. S.L.H., F.L.B., X.A., J.S.S., T.C.N., G.D.C., S.D.L., L.T.G., S.L.R., S.A.M., R.C.K. and K.C.K. performed the methodology. Formal analysis was done by S.H., A.P., J.S.S. S.L.H., F.L.B., X.A., J.S.S., T.C.N., G.D.C., S.D.L., L.T.G., S.L.R., J.P.H., A.B.S., P.I.M.Jr, P.L.H., S.S., C.W.J., B.E.P., R.A.S., N.T.G., L.A.H., J.L.P., M.J.S., C.P., D.A.P., R.C.M., R.M.D., N.K.R., B.J.O., L.D.S., S.E.B., S.A.M., R.C.K. and K.C.K. performed the investigation. S.L.H., F.L.B., X.A., J.S.S., T.C.N., G.D.C., S.D.L., L.T.G., S.L.R., J.P.H., A.B.S., P.I.M.Jr, P.L.H., S.S., C.W.J., B.E.P., R.A.S., N.T.G., L.A.H., J.L.P., M.J.S., C.P., D.A.P., R.C.M., R.M.D., N.K.R., B.J.O., L.D.S., S.E.B., S.A.M., R.C.K. and K.C.K. collected resources. The data curation was done by S.L.H., F.L.B., X.A., J.S.S., T.C.N., G.D.C., S.D.L., L.T.G., S.L.R., S.A.M., R.C.K. and K.C.K. Writing—original draft—was done by S.H., A.P. and J.S.S. Writing—review and editing—was done by A.V.S., S.D.L., V.M., S.L.H., F.L.B., X.A., T.C.N., G.D.C., L.T.G., S.L.R., J.P.H., A.B.S., C.L., P.I.M.Jr, P.L.H., S.S., C.W.J., B.E.P., R.A.S., N.T.G., L.A.H., J.L.P., M.J.S., C.P., D.A.P., R.C.M., R.M.D., N.K.R., B.J.O., L.D.S., S.E.B., S.E.H. S.A.M., R.C.K., K.C.K., J.S.S. and A.P. Visualization was done by S.H., A.P. and J.S.S. S.A.M., R.C.K., K.C.K., S.H., J.S.S. and A.P. supervised the study. Project administration was done by S.L.H., F.L.B., J.S.S., J.P.H., A.B.S., P.I.M.Jr, P.L.H., S.S., C.W.J., B.E.P., R.A.S., N.T.G., L.A.H., J.L.P., M.J.S., C.P., D.A.P., R.C.M., R.M.D, N.K.R., B.J.O., L.D.S., S.E.B., S.A.M., R.C.K. and K.C.K. Funding acquisition was done by S.A.M., R.C.K. and K.C.K. All authors revised the paper critically for important intellectual context and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer S. Stevens.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

T.C.N. has received research support from NIH, VA and Rainwater Charitable Foundation and consulting income from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. In the last 3 years, G.D.C. has received research funding from the NSF, NIH and LifeBell AI and unrestricted donations from AliveCor Inc., Amazon Research, the Center for Discovery, the Gates Foundation, Google, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, MathWorks, Microsoft Research, Nextsense Inc., One Mind Foundation, the Rett Research Foundation and Samsung Research. G.D.C. has financial interest in AliveCor Inc. and Nextsense Inc. He also is the CTO of MindChild Medical and CSO of LifeBell AI and has ownership in both companies. These relationships are unconnected to the current work. L.T.G. receives funding from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH121617) and is on the board of the Many Brains Project. L.T.G.’s family also has equity in Intelerad Medical Systems, Inc. S.L.R. reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study; personal fees from the Society of Biological Psychiatry paid role as secretary, other from Oxford University Press royalties, other from the American Psychiatric Publishing Inc. royalties, other from the Veterans Administration per diem for oversight committee and other from Community Psychiatry/Mindpath Health paid board service, including equity outside the submitted work; other from National Association of Behavioral Healthcare for paid Board service; other from Springer Publishing royalties; and Leadership roles on Board or Council for Society of Biological Psychiatry, Anxiety and Depression Association of America and National Network of Depression Centers. C.W.J. has no competing interests related to this work, though he has been an investigator on studies funded by AstraZeneca, Vapotherm, Abbott and Ophirex. S.E.H. has no competing interest related to this work, though in the last 3 years he has received research funding from Aptinyx and Arbor Medical Innovations and consulting payments from Indiana University and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. S.A.M. served as a consultant for Walter Reed Army Institute for Research and for Arbor Medical Innovations. In the past 3 years, R.C.K. was a consultant for Cambridge Health Alliance, Canandaigua Veterans Administration Medical Center, Holmusk, Partners Healthcare, Inc., RallyPoint Networks, Inc. and Sage Therapeutics. He has stock options in Cerebral Inc., Mirah, PYM and Roga Sciences. K.C.K.’s research has been supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Kaiser Family Foundation, the Harvard Center on the Developing Child, Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, the National Institutes of Health, One Mind, the Anonymous Foundation and Cohen Veterans Bioscience. She has been a paid consultant for Baker Hostetler, Discovery Vitality and the Department of Justice. She has been a paid external reviewer for the Chan Zuckerberg Foundation, the University of Cape Town and Capita Ireland. She has had paid speaking engagements in the last 3 years with the American Psychological Association and European Central Bank. Sigmund Freud University—Milan, Cambridge Health Alliance and Coverys. She receives royalties from Guilford Press and Oxford University Press. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Mental Health thanks Hannah Schumm, Saurabh Shaw and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Distribution of PTSD symptoms 3-months post-trauma by sex.

Density and boxplot for the distribution of 3-month PTSD symptoms as measured by the PCL-5, including n = 1818 women and n = 1124 men. The boxplot indicates the median as well as the 25th and 75th percentiles. Whiskers indicate 1.5 times the inter-quartile range.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information on measures included in this study. Supplementary Tables 1–5.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haering, S., Seligowski, A.V., Linnstaedt, S.D. et al. Disentangling sex differences in PTSD risk factors. Nat. Mental Health (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00236-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00236-y

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing