Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Cognitive training for mental health problems

Nature Mental Health volume 2, pages 17–24 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The persistent gap between need and access for evidence-based mental health care has spurred interest in the development of disseminable, efficacious and cost-effective approaches as stand-alone and adjunctive interventions. Computerized cognitive trainings, which originated primarily in the experimental psychopathology literature, have gained much attention as a possible approach to addressing this need–access gap. In this Perspective we describe the current state of the literature on computerized cognitive training interventions for psychopathology. Drawing on long-standing principles from learning theory and cognitive psychology, we discuss several reasons why many of these interventions (for example, cognitive bias modification) have not yet achieved their considerable potential as cost-effective, scalable and effective digital therapeutics. We also explore distinguishing features that may help to explain why some computerized cognitive training programs (for example, cognitive remediation) tend to show more robust effects than others. Finally, we leverage insights across basic and applied branches of psychology to offer concrete recommendations for building more robustly effective digital interventions moving forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Common trade-offs when developing treatments.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The State of Mental Health in America (Mental Health America, 2023); https://mhanational.org/issues/state-mental-health-america

  2. Wilhelm, S. et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the digital age: presidential address. Behav. Therapy 51, 1–14 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goghari, V. M., Krzyzanowski, D., Yoon, S., Dai, Y. & Toews, D. Attitudes and beliefs toward computerized cognitive training in the general population. Front. Psychol. 11, 503 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiers, R. W., Gladwin, T. E., Hofmann, W., Salemink, E. & Ridderinkhof, K. R. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 1, 192–212 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McNally, R. J. Attentional bias for threat: crisis or opportunity? Clin. Psychol. Rev. 69, 4–13 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mogg, K. & Bradley, B. P. Attentional bias in generalized anxiety disorder versus depressive disorder. Cogn. Therapy Res. 29, 29–45 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Teachman, B. A., Joormann, J., Steinman, S. A. & Gotlib, I. H. Automaticity in anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 32, 575–603 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. MacLeod, C., Mathews, A. & Tata, P. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 95, 15–20 (1986).

  9. Hertel, P. T. & Mathews, A. Cognitive bias modification: past perspectives, current findings, and future applications. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6, 521–536 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hakamata, Y. et al. Attention bias modification treatment: a meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biol. Psychiat. 68, 982–990 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hallion, L. S. & Ruscio, A. M. A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychol. Bull. 137, 940–958 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cristea, I. A., Mogoașe, C., David, D. & Cuijpers, P. Practitioner review: cognitive bias modification for mental health problems in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiat. 56, 723–734 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fodor, L. A., Cosmoiu, A. & Podina, I. R. Cognitive bias modification interventions for attention to and approach of appetitive food stimuli: a meta-analysis. J. Evid. Based Psychother. 17, 85–104 (2017).

  14. Hang, Y., Xu, L., Wang, C., Zhang, G. & Zhang, N. Can attention bias modification augment the effect of CBT for anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiat. Res. 299, 113892 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hang, Y., Zhang, G., Wang, C., Zhang, N. & Liu, G. Attention bias modification for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiat. Res. 300, 113896 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heeren, A., Mogoașe, C., Philippot, P. & McNally, R. J. Attention bias modification for social anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 40, 76–90 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Linetzky, M., Pergamin‐Hight, L., Pine, D. S. & Bar‐Haim, Y. Quantitative evaluation of the clinical efficacy of attention bias modification treatment for anxiety disorders. Depress. Anxiety 32, 383–391 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mogg, K., Waters, A. M. & Bradley, B. P. Attention bias modification (ABM): review of effects of multisession ABM training on anxiety and threat-related attention in high-anxious individuals. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 5, 698–717 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Turton, R., Bruidegom, K., Cardi, V., Hirsch, C. R. & Treasure, J. Novel methods to help develop healthier eating habits for eating and weight disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 61, 132–155 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Price, R. B. et al. Pooled patient-level meta-analysis of children and adults completing a computer-based anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 50, 37–49 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Xia, H.-S. et al. Attention bias modification for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Psychiat. 14, 1098610 (2023).

  22. Beard, C., Sawyer, A. T. & Hofmann, S. G. Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli:a meta-analytic review. Behav. Therapy 43, 724–740 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cristea, I. A., Kok, R. N. & Cuijpers, P. Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiat. 206, 7–16 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cristea, I. A., Kok, R. N. & Cuijpers, P. The effectiveness of cognitive bias modification interventions for substance addictions: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11, e0162226 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cristea, I. A., Kok, R. N. & Cuijpers, P. Persistent double standards in evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification: a commentary on Wiers et al. (2018). J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 79, 344–345 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fodor, L. A. et al. Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiat. 7, 506–514 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grist, R., Croker, A., Denne, M. & Stallard, P. Technology delivered interventions for depression and anxiety in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Child Family Psychol. Rev. 22, 147–171 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mogoaşe, C., David, D. & Koster, E. H. Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: an updated meta‐analysis. J. Clin. Psychol. 70, 1133–1157 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Boffo, M. et al. Cognitive bias modification for behavior change in alcohol and smoking addiction: Bayesian meta-analysis of individual participant data. Neuropsychol. Rev. 29, 52–78 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Grafton, B. et al. Confusing procedures with process when appraising the impact of cognitive bias modification on emotional vulnerability. Br. J. Psychiat. 211, 266–271 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pennant, M. E. et al. Computerised therapies for anxiety and depression in children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav. Res. Therapy 67, 1–18 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Price, R. B. et al. Less is more: patient‐level meta‐analysis reveals paradoxical dose‐response effects of a computer‐based social anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias. Depress. Anxiety 34, 1106–1115 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Wolpert, M. et al. Strategies not accompanied by a mental health professional to address anxiety and depression in children and young people: a scoping review of range and a systematic review of effectiveness. Lancet Psychiat. 6, 46–60 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Heeren, A., Mogoaşe, C., McNally, R. J., Schmitz, A. & Philippot, P. Does attention bias modification improve attentional control? A double-blind randomized experiment with individuals with social anxiety disorder. J. Anxiety Disord. 29, 35–42 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Koster, E. H., Hoorelbeke, K., Onraedt, T., Owens, M. & Derakshan, N. Cognitive control interventions for depression: a systematic review of findings from training studies. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 53, 79–92 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Morrison, A. S. & Heimberg, R. G. Social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 9, 249–274 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wisco, B. E. Depressive cognition: self-reference and depth of processing. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 29, 382–392 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Clark, D. M. A cognitive approach to panic. Behav. Res. Therapy 24, 461–470 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, H., Li, X., Han, B. & Liu, X. Effects of cognitive bias modification on social anxiety: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12, e0175107 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Loijen, A., Vrijsen, J. N., Egger, J. I., Becker, E. S. & Rinck, M. Biased approach-avoidance tendencies in psychopathology: a systematic review of their assessment and modification. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 77, 101825 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 3137–3146 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wiers, R. W., Van Dessel, P. & Köpetz, C. ABC training: a new theory-based form of cognitive-bias modification to foster automatization of alternative choices in the treatment of addiction and related disorders. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 29, 499–505 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wolz, I., Nannt, J. & Svaldi, J. Laboratory-based interventions targeting food craving: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 21, e12996 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Koster, E. H., De Lissnyder, E., Derakshan, N. & De Raedt, R. Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective: the impaired disengagement hypothesis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 31, 138–145 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Schweizer, S., Grahn, J., Hampshire, A., Mobbs, D. & Dalgleish, T. Training the emotional brain: improving affective control through emotional working memory training. J. Neurosci. 33, 5301–5311 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Motter, J. N. et al. Computerized cognitive training and functional recovery in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 189, 184–191 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mokhtari, S., Mokhtari, A., Bakizadeh, F., Moradi, A. & Shalbafan, M. Cognitive rehabilitation for improving cognitive functions and reducing the severity of depressive symptoms in adult patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. BMC Psychiat. 23, 77 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Vita, A. et al. Effectiveness, core elements, and moderators of response of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Psychiat. 78, 848–858 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Legemaat, A. M. et al. Effectiveness of cognitive remediation in depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 52, 4146–4161 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cella, M. et al. Cognitive remediation for inpatients with psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 50, 1062–1076 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Therond, A. et al. The efficacy of cognitive remediation in depression: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 284, 238–246 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kambeitz-Ilankovic, L. et al. Multi-outcome meta-analysis (MOMA) of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: revisiting the relevance of human coaching and elucidating interplay between multiple outcomes. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 107, 828–845 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Revell, E. R., Neill, J. C., Harte, M., Khan, Z. & Drake, R. J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in early schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 168, 213–222 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. van Duin, D. et al. The effect of rehabilitation combined with cognitive remediation on functioning in persons with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 49, 1414–1425 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tripathi, A., Kar, S. K. & Shukla, R. Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: understanding the biological correlates and remediation strategies. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci. 16, 7–17 (2018).

  56. Lattie, E. G., Stiles-Shields, C. & Graham, A. K. An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1, 87–100 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Harvey, P. D., McGurk, S. R., Mahncke, H. & Wykes, T. Controversies in computerized cognitive training. Biol. Psychiat. 3, 907–915 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fiedler, K. & Schwarz, N. Questionable research practices revisited. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 7, 45–52 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Woodworth, R. S. & Thorndike, E. L. The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I). Psychol. Rev. 8, 247–261 (1901).

  60. Sala, G. & Gobet, F. Cognitive training does not enhance general cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23, 9–20 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Smid, C. R., Karbach, J. & Steinbeis, N. Toward a science of effective cognitive training. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 29, 531–537 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Nguyen, L., Murphy, K. & Andrews, G. Immediate and long-term efficacy of executive functions cognitive training in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 145, 698–733 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S. & Hulme, C. Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of ‘far transfer’ evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 512–534 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. A Consensus on the Brain Training Industry from the Scientific Community (Summary) (Stanford Center on Longevity, 2014); https://longevity.stanford.edu/a-consensus-on-the-brain-training-industry-from-the-scientific-community/

  65. Cognitive Training Data Response Letter (Congitive Training Data, 2014); https://www.cognitivetrainingdata.org/the-controversy-does-brain-training-work/response-letter/

  66. Blackwell, S. E. Clinical efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions. Lancet Psychiat. 7, 465–467 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Bouton, M. E. Context and ambiguity in the extinction of emotional learning: implications for exposure therapy. Behav. Res. Therapy 26, 137–149 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Blackwell, S. E. et al. Demonstration of a ‘leapfrog’ randomized controlled trial as a method to accelerate the development and optimization of psychological interventions. Psychol. Med. 3, 1–11 (2022).

  69. Van Dessel, P., Hughes, S. & De Houwer, J. How do actions influence attitudes? An inferential account of the impact of action performance on stimulus evaluation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 23, 267–284 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Weisz, J. R., Krumholz, L. S., Santucci, L., Thomassin, K. & Ng, M. Y. Shrinking the gap between research and practice: tailoring and testing youth psychotherapies in clinical care contexts. Ann. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 11, 139–163 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Lorenzo-Luaces, L. Identifying active ingredients in cognitive-behavioral therapies: what if we didn’t? Behav. Res. Therapy 168, 104365 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

L.S.H. was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (grant no. K01 MH 116328). We thank M. K. Caulfield for her assistance with preparing Fig. 1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Lauren S. Hallion

  2. Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Kean J. Hsu

  3. Department of Psychiatry, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA

    Kean J. Hsu

  4. Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA

    Jessica L. Schleider

  5. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

    Jessica L. Schleider

Authors
  1. Lauren S. Hallion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kean J. Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jessica L. Schleider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.S.H. was responsible for conceptualization and preparing the original draft. K.J.H. contributed to conceptualization, writing and editing. J.L.S. contributed to conceptualization and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren S. Hallion.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Mental Health thanks Simon E. Blackwell, Brooke C. Schneider and Susanne Schweizer for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hallion, L.S., Hsu, K.J. & Schleider, J.L. Cognitive training for mental health problems. Nat. Mental Health 2, 17–24 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00185-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00185-y

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing