Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

The why, who and how of social touch

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 2, pages 606–621 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

A growing body of evidence from the behavioural and neural sciences indicates that social touch has a vital role in human development and psychological well-being. Despite some advances, differences in emphasis and approach across disciplines have hampered a comprehensive understanding of touch behaviour in social interactions. In this Review, we synthesize findings from quantitative and qualitative research in psychology and neuroscience to present a cross-disciplinary framework for investigating social touch and interpreting the associated behaviour. This framework elucidates levels of analysis and explanation for the functions, evolution, mechanisms and development of social touch. We highlight three main areas of inquiry, many of which remain under-researched: the purpose of social touch (‘why’), the individuals involved in the touch (‘who’) and the use of social touch in a given situation (‘how’). Together, these dimensions can accommodate features of social relationships from the level of the individual to society while also taking into account the influence of intention, motivation and emotion on social touch. We also consider important yet often overlooked factors such as the species’ evolutionary history, language and sociocultural variables, as well as biological mechanisms underpinning social touch.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The distinction between ultimate and proximate functions.
Fig. 2: Relationship and cultural influences on social touch acceptability.
Fig. 3: The why, who, and how of social touch.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashley Montagu, T. The Human Significance Of The Skin (Perennial Library, 1986).

  2. Harlow, H. F. & Zimmermann, R. R. The development of affectional responses in infant monkeys. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 102, 501–509 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morrison, I., Loken, L. S. & Olausson, H. The skin as a social organ. Exp. Brain Res. 204, 305–314 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Field, T. Massage therapy research review. Complem. Ther. Clin. Pract. 24, 19–31 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hertenstein, M. J., Verkamp, J. M., Kerestes, A. M. & Holmes, R. M. The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: a review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 132, 5–94 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gallace, A. & Spence, C. The science of interpersonal touch: an overview. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 246–259 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Olausson, H. et al. Functional role of unmyelinated tactile afferents in human hairy skin: sympathetic response and perceptual localization. Exp. Brain Res. 184, 135–140 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Olausson, H., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F. & Vallbo, A. The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 185–191 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tinbergen, N. On aims and methods of ethology. Anim. Biol. 55, 297–321 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hinde, R. A. Ethology, its Nature and Relations with Other Sciences (Oxford Univ. Press, 1982).

  11. Sailer, U. & Leknes, S. Meaning makes touch affective. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 44, 101099 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bowlby, J. Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 52, 664–678 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ardiel, E. L. & Rankin, C. H. The importance of touch in development. Paediatr. Child. Health 15, 153–156 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez, A., Lovic, V., Ward, G. R., Wainwright, P. E. & Fleming, A. S. Intergenerational effects of complete maternal deprivation and replacement stimulation on maternal behavior and emotionality in female rats. Dev. Psychobiol. 38, 11–32 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Champagne, D. L. et al. Maternal care and hippocampal plasticity: evidence for experience-dependent structural plasticity, altered synaptic functioning, and differential responsiveness to glucocorticoids and stress. J. Neurosci. 28, 6037–6045 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cascio, C. J., Moore, D. & McGlone, F. Social touch and human development. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 35, 5–11 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brauer, J., Xiao, Y., Poulain, T., Friederici, A. D. & Schirmer, A. Frequency of maternal touch predicts resting activity and connectivity of the developing social brain. Cerebral Cortex https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw137 (2016).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Morrison, I. Keep calm and cuddle on: social touch as a stress buffer. Adapt. Hum. Behav. Phys. 2, 344–362 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gilbert, C. et al. One for all and all for one: the energetic benefits of huddling in endotherms. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 85, 545–569 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Norholt, H. Revisiting the roots of attachment: a review of the biological and psychological effects of maternal skin-to-skin contact and carrying of full-term infants. Infant. Behav. Dev. 60, 101441 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cleveland, L. et al. Systematic review of skin-to-skin care for full-term, healthy newborns. J. Obst. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 46, 857–869 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hook, K. Affective loop experiences: designing for interactional embodiment. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 364, 3585–3595 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gulledge, A. K., Gulledge, M. H. & Stahmannn, R. F. Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. Am. J. Family Ther. 31, 233–242 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson, H. & Geher, G. Mutual grooming in human dyadic relationships: an ethological perspective. Curr. Psychol. 26, 121–140 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wagner, S. A., Mattson, R. E., Davila, J., Johnson, M. D. & Cameron, N. M. Touch me just enough: the intersection of adult attachment, intimate touch, and marital satisfaction. J. Soc. Personal. Relat. 37, 1945–1967 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wlodarski, R. & Dunbar, R. I. Examining the possible functions of kissing in romantic relationships. Arch. Sex. Behav. 42, 1415–1423 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Goodwin, M. H. & Cekaite, A. Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control, Care, and Mundane Creativity (Routledge, 2018).

  28. de León, L. The soothing nursing niche: affective touch, talk, and pragmatic responses to Mayan infants’ crying. J. Pragmat. 185, 146–160 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Takada, A. Pragmatic reframing from distress to playfulness: !Xun caregiver responses to infant crying. J. Pragmat. 181, 180–195 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hofer, M. A., Brunelli, S. A. & Shair, H. N. The effects of 24-hr maternal separation and of litter-size reduction on the isolation-distress response of 12-day-old rat pups. Dev. Psychobiol. 26, 483–497 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Panksepp, J. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998).

  32. Panksepp, J. The cross-mammalian neurophenomenology of primal emotional affects: from animal feelings to human therapeutics. J. Comp. Neurol. 524, 1624–1635 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dunbar, R. M. & Schultz, S. S. Social complexity and the fractal structure of group size in primate social evolution. Biol. Rev. 96, 1889–1906 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dunbar, R. I. The social role of touch in humans and primates: behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 260–268 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Keverne, E. B., Martensz, N. D. & Tuite, B. Beta-endorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkeys are influenced by grooming relationships. Psychoneuroendocrinology 14, 155–161 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Testard, C. et al. Social connections predict brain structure in a multidimensional free-ranging primate society. Sci. Adv. 8, eabl5794 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Jones, S. E. & Yarbrough, E. A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch. Commun. Monogr. 52, 19–56 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schirmer, A. et al. Squeeze me, but don’t tease me: human and mechanical touch enhance visual attention and emotion discrimination. Soc. Neurosci. 6, 219–230 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schirmer, A. & Gunter, T. C. The right touch: stroking of CT-innervated skin promotes vocal emotion processing. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 17, 1129–1140 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wingenbach, T. S. H., Ribeiro, B., Nakao, C., Gruber, J. & Boggio, P. S. Emotion evaluations of affective stimuli modulated by another Person’ s presence and affiliative touch. Emotion 21, 360–375 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cekaite, A. in Touch In Social Interaction (eds Cekaite, A. & Mondada, L.) 81–102 (Routledge, 2020).

  42. Goodwin, C. The Co-operative Action (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018).

  43. Marstrand, A. K. & Svennevig, J. A preference for non-invasive touch in caregiving contexts. Soc. Interact. https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v1i2.110019 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cekaite, A. & Holm Kvist, M. The comforting touch: tactile intimacy and talk in managing children’s distress. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 50, 109–127 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Burdelski, M. Teacher compassionate touch in a Japanese preschool. Soc. Interact. https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i1.120248 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Reece, C., Ebstein, R., Cheng, X., Ng, T. & Schirmer, A. Maternal touch predicts social orienting in young children. Cogn. Dev. 39, 128–140 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hertenstein, M. J. Touch: its communicative functions in infancy. Hum. Dev. 45, 70–94 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stack, D. M. & Muir, D. W. Adult tactile stimulation during face-to-face interactions modulates 5-month-olds affect and attention. Child Dev. 63, 1509–1525 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cigales, M., Field, T., Hossain, Z., Pelaez-Nogueras, M. & Gewirtz, J. Touch among children at nursery school. Early Child. Dev. Care 126, 101–110 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pirazzoli, L., Lloyd-Fox, S., Braukmann, R., Johnson, M. H. & Gliga, T. Hand or spoon? Exploring the neural basis of affective touch in 5-month-old infants. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 35, 28–35 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Thompson, E. H. & Hampton, J. A. The effect of relationship status on communicating emotions through touch. Cogn. Emot. 25, 295–306 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kirsch, L. P. et al. Reading the mind in the touch: neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch. Neuropsychologia 11, 136–149 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. McIntyre, S. et al. in 2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC) 175–180 (IEEE, 2019).

  54. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Hale, J. L. & DeTurck, M. A. Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Hum. Commun. Res. 10, 351–378 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Afifi, W. A. & Johnson, M. L. The use and interpretation of tie signs in a public setting: relationship and sex differences. J. Soc. Personal. Relatsh. 16, 9–38 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Goffman, E. Relations In Public. Microstudies Of The Public Order (Harper and Row, 1972).

  57. Burgoon, J. K. Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture. J. Nonverbal Behav. 15, 233–259 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Schirmer, A., Ng, T. & Ebstein, R. P. Vicarious social touch biases gazing at faces and facial emotions. Emotion https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000393 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. McIntyre, S. et al. The language of social touch is intuitive and quantifiable. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211059801 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Jakubiak, B. K. & Feeney, B. C. Affectionate touch to promote relational, psychological, and physical well-being in adulthood: a theoretical model and review of the research. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21, 228–252 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Peláez-Nogueras, M. et al. The effects of systematic stroking versus tickling and poking on infant behavior. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 18, 169–178 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Schirmer, A. & McGlone, F. A touching sight: EEG/ERP correlates for the vicarious processing of affectionate touch. Cortex 111, 1–15 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Korisky, A., Eisenberger, N. I., Nevat, M., Weissman-Fogel, I. & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. A dual-brain approach for understanding the neuralmechanisms that underlie the comforting effects of social touch. Cortex 127, 333–346 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Novembre, G., Etzi, R. & Morrison, I. Hedonic responses to touch are modulated by the perceived attractiveness of the caresser. Neuroscience 464, 79–89 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Fraser, O. N., Stahl, D. & Aureli, F. Stress reduction through consolation in chimpanzees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 8557–8562 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Burkett, J. P. et al. Oxytocin-dependent consolation behavior in rodents. Science 351, 375–378 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Lecker, I., Yini, X., Zhang, H. & Bonin, R. P. Physical contact promotes the development of emotional contagion between mice. Neuroscience 464, 126–132 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Coan, J. A., Schaefer, H. S. & Davidson, R. J. Lending a hand: social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1032–1039 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Davidson, L. & Kelly, B. F. The pragmatics of managing children’s distress in Murrinhpatha, a traditional Australian language. J. Pragmat. 184, 167–184 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kim, K. J., Feeney, B. C. & Jakubiak, B. K. Touch reduces romantic jealousy in the anxiously attached. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517702012 (2017).

  71. Goldstein, P., Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Yellinek, S. & Weissman-Fogel, I. Empathy predicts an experimental pain reduction during touch. J. Pain 17, 1049–1057 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kawamichi, H., Kitada, R., Yoshihara, K., Takahashi, H. K. & Sadato, N. Interpersonal touch suppresses visual processing of aversive stimuli. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 164–164 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Della Longa, L., Carnevali, L., Patron, E., Dragovic, D. & Farroni, T. Psychophysiological and visual behavioral responses to faces associated with affective and non-affective touch in four-month-old infants. Neuroscience 464, 67–78 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Nava, E., Etzi, R., Gallace, A. & Macchi Cassia, V. Socially-relevant visual stimulation modulates physiological response to affective touch in human infants. Neuroscience 464, 59–66 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Edwards, S. C. An anthropological interpretation of nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of the use of space and touch. J. Adv. Nurs. 28, 809–817 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. De Waal, F. B. M. & Aureli, F. Conflict resolution and distress alleviation in monkeys and apes. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 807, 317–328 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Romero, T., Castellanos, M. A. & de Waal, F. B. Consolation as possible expression of sympathetic concern among chimpanzees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12110–12115 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Romero, T. & de Waal, F. B. Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) consolation: third-party identity as a window on possible function. J. Comp. Psychol. 124, 278–286 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Dunn, J. in Handbook Of Affective Sciences (eds Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., Goldsmith, H. H.) Ch. 18 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).

  80. Caplan, M. Z. & Hay, D. F. Preschoolers’ responses to peers’ distress and beliefs about bystander intervention. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 30, 231–242 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Holm Kvist, M. & Cekaite, A. Emotion socialization — compassion or non-engagement — in young children’s responses to peer distress. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 28, 100462 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Phinney, J. S., Feshbach, N. D. & Farver, J. Preschool children’s response to peer crying. Early Child. Res. Q. 1, 207–219 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Fleck, B. & Chavajay, P. Physical interactions involving preschoolers and kindergartners in a childcare center. Early Child. Res. Q. 24, 46–54 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Bergnehr, D. & Cekaite, A. Adult-initiated touch and its functions at a Swedish preschool: controlling, affectionate, assisting and educative haptic conduct. Int. J. Early Years Educ. 26, 312–331 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ekström, A. & Cekaite, A. Children’s touch in a Swedish preschool: touch cultures in peer group interaction. Int. J. Early Years Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2020.1857709 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Lancy, D. F. The Anthropology of Childhood: Cherubs, Chattel, Changelings (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).

  87. Rogoff, B. The Cultural Nature of Human Development (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).

  88. Twardosz, S., Botkin, D., Cunningham, J. L. & Weddle, K. Expression of affection in day care. Child Study J. 17, 133–151 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Field, T. et al. Touching in infant, toddler, and preschool nurseries. Early Child Dev. Care 98, 113–120 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Devine, S. L., Walker, S. C., Makdani, A., Stockton, E. R. & McFarquhar, M. J. Childhood adversity and affective touch perception: A comparison of United Kingdom care leavers and non-care leavers. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557171 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Croy, I., Geide, H., Paulus, M., Weidner, K. & Olausson, H. Affective touch awareness in mental health and disease relates to autistic traits — an explorative neurophysiological investigation. Psychiat. Res. 245, 491–496 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Krahe, C., Drabek, M., Paloyelis, Y. & Fotopoulou, A. Affective touch and attachment style modulate pain: a laser-evoked potentials study. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20160009 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Krahé, C. et al. Sensitivity to CT-optimal, affective touch depends on adult attachment style. Sci. Rep. 8, 14544 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Spitoni, G. F. et al. Disorganized attachment pattern affects the perception of affective touch. Sci. Rep. 10, 9658 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Jakubiak, B. K. & Feeney, B. C. A sense of security: touch promotes state attachment security. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 7, 745–753 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Jakubiak, B. K., Fuentes, J. D. & Feeney, B. C. Individual and relational differences in desire for touch in romantic relationships. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211003331 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Perini, I. et al. Altered relationship between subjective perception and central representation of touch hedonics in adolescents with autism-spectrum disorder. Transl. Psychiat. 11, 224 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Mikkelsen, M., Wodka, E. L., Mostofsky, S. H. & Puts, N. A. Autism spectrum disorder in the scope of tactile processing. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 29, 140–150 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Crucianelli, L., Cardi, V., Treasure, J. & Paul, M. The perception of affective touch in anorexia nervosa. Psychiat. Res. 239, 72–78 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Davidovic, M., Jonsson, E. H., Olausson, H. & Bjornsdotter, M. Posterior superior temporal sulcus responses predict perceived pleasantness of skin stroking. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 432 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Sorokowska, A. et al. Affective interpersonal touch in close relationships: a cross-cultural perspective. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220988373 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Sailer, U. & Ackerley, R. Exposure shapes the perception of affective touch. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.008 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Morrison, I. Affective and discriminative touch: a reappraisal. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 43, 145–151 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Suvilehto, J. T., Glerean, E., Dunbar, R. I. M., Hari, R. & Nummenmaa, L. Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 13811–13816 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Suvilehto, J. T. et al. Cross-cultural similarity in relationship-specific social touching. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20190467 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Suvilehto, J. T., Renvall, V. & Nummenmaa, L. Relationship-specific encoding of social touch in somatosensory and insular cortices. Neuroscience https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.015 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Heslin, R., Nguyen, T. D. & Nguyen, M. L. Meaning of touch: the case of touch from a stranger or same sex person. J. Nonverbal Behav. 7, 147–157 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Barnlund, D. C. Public And Private Self In Japan And The United States. Communicative Styles Of Two Cultures (Simul, 1975).

  109. Heslin, R. & Alper, T. in Nonverbal Communication (eds J. M. Wiemann & R. P. Harrison) 47–76 (Sage, 1983).

  110. Jourard, S. M. An exploratory study of body-accessibility. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 5, 221–231 (1966).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Rosenfeld, L. B., Kartus, S. & Ray, C. Body accessibility revisited. J. Commun. 26, 27–30 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Nguyen, T., Heslin, R. & Nguyen, M. L. The meanings of touch: sex differences. J. Commun. 25, 92–103 (1975).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Roese, N. J., Olson, J. M., Borenstein, M. N., Martin, A. & Shores, A. L. Same-sex touching behavior: the moderating role of homophobic attitudes. J. Nonverbal Behav. 16, 249–259 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Derlega, V. J., Catanzaro, D. & Lewis, R. J. Perceptions about tactile intimacy in same-sex and opposite-sex pairs based on research participants’ sexual orientation. Psychol. Men. Masc. 2, 124–132 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Floyd, K. Affectionate same-sex touch: the influence of homophobia on observers’ perceptions. J. Soc. Psychol. 140, 774–788 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Jones, S. E. Sex differences in touch communication. West. J. Speech Commun. 50, 227–241 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Russo, V., Ottaviani, C. & Spitoni, G. F. Affective touch: a meta-analysis on sex differences. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 108, 445–452 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Major, B., Schmidlin, A. M. & Williams, L. Gender patterns in social touch: the impact of setting and age. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 634–643 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Benenson, J. F. & Wrangham, R. W. Cross-cultural sex differences in post-conflict affiliation following sports matches. Curr. Biol. 0, 670–679 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Mead, M. Sex And Temperament In Three Primitive Societies Vol. 370 (Morrow, 1963).

  121. Williams, S. J. & Willis, F. N. Interpersonal touch among preschool children at play. Psychol. Rec. 28, 501–508 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Harrison-Speake, K. & Willis, F. N. Ratings of the appropriateness of touch among family members. J. Nonverbal Behav. 19, 85–101 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Floyd, K. et al. Kissing in marital and cohabiting relationships: effects on blood lipids, stress, and relationship satisfaction. West. J. Commun. 73, 113–133 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Emmers, T. M. & Dindia, K. The effect of relational stage and intimacy on touch: an extension of Guerrero and Andersen. Personal. Relat. 2, 225–236 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Guerrero, L. K. & Andersen, P. A. The waxing and waning of relational intimacy: touch as a function of relational stage, gender and touch avoidance. J. Soc. Personal. Relat. 8, 147–165 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Depue, R. A. & Morrone-Strupinsky, J. V. A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding: implications for conceptualizing a human trait of affiliation. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 313–349 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Van Leeuwen, E. J., Mundry, R., Cronin, K. A., Bodamer, M. & Haun, D. B. Chimpanzee culture extends beyond matrilineal family units. Curr. Biol. 27, R588–R590 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Burleson, M. H., Roberts, N. A., Coon, D. W. & Soto, J. A. Perceived cultural acceptability and comfort with affectionate touch. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517750005 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Remland, M. S., Jones, T. S. & Brinkman, H. Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: effects of culture, gender, and age. J. Soc. Psychol. 135, 281–297 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Dibiase, R. & Gunnoe, J. Gender and culture differences in touching behavior. J. Soc. Psychol. 144, 49–62 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Regan, P. C., Jerry, D., Narvaez, M. & Johnson, D. Public displays of affection among Asian and Latino heterosexual couples. Psychol. Rep. 84, 1201–1202 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Tahhan, D. A. The Japanese Family: Touch, Intimacy, and Feeling (Routledge, 2014).

  133. George, A. The no-touch taboos: an understanding of sexuality and gender in the Indian context. J. Arts Human. 7, 218–229 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Hewlett, B. S. Intimate Fathers: The Nature and Context of Aka Pygmy Paternal Infant Care (Univ. Michigan Press, 1993).

  135. Suvilehto, J. T. Maintaining Social Bonds Via Touching: A Cross-cultural Study (Aalto Univ., 2018).

  136. Greenbaum, P. E. & Rosenfeld, H. M. Varieties of touching in greetings: sequential structure and sex-related differences. J. Nonverbal Behav. 5, 13–25 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Remland, M. S., Jones, T. S. & Brinkman, H. Proxemic and haptic behavior in three European countries. J. Nonverbal Behav. 15, 215–232 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Stansbury, K., Haley, D., Lee, J. & Brophy-Herb, H. E. Adult caregivers’ behavioral responses to child noncompliance in public settings: gender differences and the role of positive and negative touch. Behav. Soc. Issues 21, 80–114 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Svinth, L. Being touched — the transformative potential of nurturing touch practices in relation to toddlers’ learning and emotional well-being. Early Child Dev. Care 188, 924–936 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Crusco, A. H. & Wetzel, C. G. The Midas touch: the effects of interpersonal touch on restaurant tipping. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 10, 512–517 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Burgoon, J. K., Walther, J. B. & Baesler, E. J. Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch. Hum. Commun. Res. 19, 237–263 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Fisher, J. D., Rytting, M. & Heslin, R. Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. Sociometry 39, 416–421 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Hornik, J. Tactile stimulation and consumer response. J. Consum. Res. 19, 449–458 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Joule, R.-V. & Guéguen, N. Touch, compliance, and awareness of tactile contact. Percept. Mot. Skills 104, 581–588 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Kleinke, C. L. Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 13, 218–223 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Willis, F. N. & Hamm, H. K. The use of interpersonal touch in securing compliance. J. Nonverbal Behav. 5, 49–55 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Patterson, M. L., Powell, J. L. & Lenihan, M. G. Touch, compliance, and interpersonal affect. J. Nonverbal Behav. 10, 41–50 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Dolinski, D. Touch, compliance, and homophobia. J. Nonverbal Behav. 34, 179–192 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Segrin, C. The effects of nonverbal behavior on outcomes of compliance gaining attempts. Commun. Stud. 44, 169–187 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Koppel, L., Andersson, D., Morrison, I., Västfjäll, D. & Tinghög, G. The (null) effect of affective touch on betrayal aversion, altruism, and risk taking. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 11, 251 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Rosenberger, L. A., Ree, A., Eisenegger, C. & Sailer, U. Slow touch targeting CT-fibres does not increase prosocial behaviour in economic laboratory tasks. Sci. Rep. 8, 7700 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Burnside, I. M. Caring for the aged: touching is talking. Am. J. Nurs. 73, 2060–2063 (1973).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Seaman, L. Affective nursing touch. Geriat. Nurs. 3, 163–164 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Kelly, M. et al. Experience of touch in health care: a meta-ethnography across the health care professions. Qual. Health Res. 28, 200–212 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Kelly, M., Ellaway, R., Scherpbier, A., King, N. & Dornan, T. Body pedagogics: embodied learning for the health professions. Med. Educ. 53, 967–977 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Routasalo, P. Physical touch in nursing studies: a literature review. J. Adv. Nurs. 30, 843–850 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Pedrazza, M., Minuzzo, S., Berlanda, S. & Trifiletti, E. Nurses’ comfort with touch and workplace well-being. West. J. Nurs. Res. 37, 781–798 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Pedrazza, M., Berlanda, S., Trifiletti, E. & Minuzzo, S. Variables of individual difference and the experience of touch in nursing. West. J. Nurs. Res. 40, 1614–1637 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Kopf, D. Massage and touch-based therapy: clinical evidence, neurobiology and applications in older patients with psychiatric symptoms. Z. Gerontol. Geriat. 54, 753–758 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Mononen, K. Embodied care: affective touch as a facilitating resource for interaction between caregivers and residents in a care home for older adults. Linguist. Vanguard. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0036 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Tomita, M. An exploratory study of touch zones in college students on two campuses. Calif. J. Health Promot. 6, 1–22 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Li, J., Ju, W. & Reeves, B. Touching a mechanical body: tactile contact with intimate parts of a human-shaped robot is physiologically arousing. J. Hum. Robot Interact. 6, 118–130 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Burke, R. S. & Duncan, J. Culturally contested corporeality: regulation of the body in New Zealand and Japanese early childhood education. Glob. Stud. Child. 6, 6–16 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Piper, H. & Smith, H. ‘Touch’ in educational and child care settings: dilemmas and responses. Br. Educ. Res. J. 29, 879–894 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Cekaite, A. Shepherding the child: embodied directive sequences in parent–child interactions. Text Talk https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.001 (2010).

  166. Croy, I., Sehlstedt, I., Wasling, H. B., Ackerley, R. & Olausson, H. Gentle touch perception: from early childhood to adolescence. Dev. Cognit. Neurosci. 35, 81–86 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Haggarty, C. J., Trotter, P. D., McGlone, F. & Walker, S. C. Children’s vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress. PLoS One 16, e0256303 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Panksepp, J., Herman, B., Conner, R., Bishop, P. & Scott, J. P. The biology of social attachments: opiates alleviate separation distress. Biol. Psychiat. 13, 607–618 (1978).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Loseth, G. E., Ellingsen, D. M. & Leknes, S. State-dependent mu-opioid modulation of social motivation. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 430 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Barr, C. S. et al. Variation at the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) influences attachment behavior in infant primates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5277–5281 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. Spape, M. M., Harjunen, V. & Ravaja, N. Effects of touch on emotional face processing: a study of event-related potentials, facial EMG and cardiac activity. Biol. Psychol. 124, 1–10 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Triscoli, C., Croy, I., Steudte-Schmiedgen, S., Olausson, H. & Sailer, U. Heart rate variability is enhanced by long-lasting pleasant touch at CT-optimized velocity. Biol. Psychol. 128, 71–81 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Triscoli, C., Croy, I., Olausson, H. & Sailer, U. Touch between romantic partners: being stroked is more pleasant than stroking and decelerates heart rate. Physiol. Behav. 177, 169–175 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Handlin, L. et al. Human endogenous oxytocin and its neural correlates show adaptive responses to social touch based on recent social context. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81197 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Mayo, L. M., Lindé, J., Olausson, H., Heilig, M. & Morrison, I. Putting a good face on touch: facial expression reflects the affective valence of caress-like touch across modalities. Biol. Psychol. 137, 83–90 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Gentsch, A., Panagiotopoulou, E. & Fotopoulou, A. Active interpersonal touch gives rise to the social softness illusion. Curr. Biol. 25, 2392–2397 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Guest, S. et al. Sensory and affective judgments of skin during inter- and intrapersonal touch. Acta Psychol. 130, 115–126 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Croy, I. et al. Interpersonal stroking touch is targeted to C tactile afferent activation. Behav. Brain Res. 297, 37–40 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Craig, A. D. Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 500–505 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Morrison, I. ALE meta-analysis reveals dissociable networks for affective and discriminative aspects of touch. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 1308–1320 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. Morrison, I., Bjornsdotter, M. & Olausson, H. Vicarious responses to social touch in posterior insular cortex are tuned to pleasant caressing speeds. J. Neurosci. 31, 9554–9562 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  182. Goodwin, M. H. C., A. Haptic Sociality: The Embodied Interactive Constitution of Intimacy Through Touch 73–102 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).

  183. Burdelski, M. C., A. Control Touch in Caregiver–Child Interaction: Embodied Organization in Triadic Mediation of Peer Conflict in Swedish and Japanese 103–123 (Routledge, 2020).

  184. Cekaite, A. Coordination of talk and touch in adult–child directives: touch and social control. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 48, 152–175 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  185. Goodwin, M. H. C., A. Embodied Family Choreography (Routledge, 2018).

  186. Löken, L. S., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F. & Olausson, H. Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 547–548 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Wessberg, J., Olausson, H., Fernstrom, K. W. & Vallbo, A. B. Receptive field properties of unmyelinated tactile afferents in the human skin. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 1567–1575 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Ackerley, R. et al. Human C-tactile afferents are tuned to the temperature of a skin-stroking caress. J. Neurosci. 34, 2879–2883 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  189. Bendas, J., Ree, A., Pabel, L., Sailer, U. & Croy, I. Dynamics of affective habituation to touch differ on the group and individual level. Neuroscience 464, 44–52 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Crucianelli, L., Chancel, M. & Ehrsson, H. H. Modeling affective touch pleasantness across skin types at the individual level reveals a reliable and stable basic function. J. Neurophysiol. 128, 1435–1452 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Marshall, A. G., Sharma, M. L., Marley, K., Olausson, H. & McGlone, F. P. Spinal signalling of C-fiber mediated pleasant touch in humans. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51642 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. Dum, R. P., Levinthal, D. J. & Strick, P. L. The spinothalamic system targets motor and sensory areas in the cerebral cortex of monkeys. J. Neurosci. 29, 14223–14235 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  193. Craig, A. D. How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 655–666 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  194. Case, L. K. et al. Pleasant deep pressure: expanding the social touch hypothesis. Neuroscience 464, 3–11 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Kirsch, L. P. et al. Damage to the right insula disrupts the perception of affective touch. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47895 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  196. Grandi, L. C. From sweeping to the caress: similarities and discrepancies between human and non-human primates’ pleasant touch. Front. Psychol. 7, 1371 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  197. Jablonski, N. G. Social and affective touch in primates and its role in the evolution of social cohesion. Neuroscience 464, 117–125 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Watkins, R. H. et al. Evidence for sparse C-tactile afferent innervation of glabrous human hand skin. J. Neurophysiol. 125, 232–237 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Li, L. et al. The functional organization of cutaneous low-threshold mechanosensory neurons. Cell 147, 1615–1627 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  200. Lloyd, D. M., McGlone, F. P. & Yosipovitch, G. Somatosensory pleasure circuit: from skin to brain and back. Exp. Dermatol. 24, 321–324 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Mirams, L. et al. Good vibrations: global processing can increase the pleasantness of touch. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 69, 2471–2486 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  202. Dominguez-Borras, J., Rieger, S. W., Corradi-Dell’Acqua, C., Neveu, R. & Vuilleumier, P. Fear spreading across senses: visual emotional events alter cortical responses to touch, audition, and vision. Cereb. Cortex 27, 68–82 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. Ebisch, S. J. et al. Integrative processing of touch and affect in social perception: an fMRI study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 209 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  204. Schirmer, A. & Adolphs, R. Emotion perception from face, voice, and touch: comparisons and convergence. Trends Cogn. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.001 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  205. Morrison, I. et al. Reduced C-afferent fibre density affects perceived pleasantness and empathy for touch. Brain 134, 1116–1126 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  206. Wijaya, M. et al. The human “feel” of touch contributes to its perceived pleasantness. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 46, 155–171 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neurobiology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Juulia T. Suvilehto & India Morrison

  2. Department of Thematic Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Asta Cekaite

Authors
  1. Juulia T. Suvilehto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asta Cekaite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. India Morrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to India Morrison.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Siri Leknes and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suvilehto, J.T., Cekaite, A. & Morrison, I. The why, who and how of social touch. Nat Rev Psychol 2, 606–621 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00217-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00217-5

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing