Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Academics can do more to disrupt and reframe the solution space for food system transformation

Nature Food volume 4, pages 928–930 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Food systems transformations are necessary, but will be difficult to achieve without disrupting current political framings and governance mechanisms. The academic community can do more to drive change at the science–policy interface to open a larger political, social and economic space for progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. van den Hove, S. Futures 39, 807–826 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Turnhout, E. et al. Science 373, 1093–1095 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh, B. K. et al. Nat. Food 2, 838–842 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan, J. et al. Nat. Food 3, 183–186 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández, R. J. Environ. Sci. Policy 64, 171–176 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hill, M. & Varone, F. The Public Policy Process (Routledge, 2021).

  7. Hall, S. & Davis, M. Front. Clim. 3, 708913 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Benton, T. G. & Harwatt, H. Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems: comparing contrasting and contested versions (Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2022); https://doi.org/10.55317/9781784135263

  9. Béné, C. et al. World Dev. 113, 116–130 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kay, J. & King, M. Radical Uncertainty: Decision-Making Beyond the Numbers (W. W. Norton & Company, 2020).

  11. Sharpe, S. Five Times Faster (Cambridge University Press, 2023).

  12. Buzzelli, M. in The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Justice (eds Holifield, R., Chakraborty, J. & Walker, G.) 327–338 (Routledge, 2017).

  13. Parkhurst, J. The Politics of Evidence (Taylor & Francis, 2017).

  14. Benton, T. G. & Bailey, R. Glob. Sustain. 2, E6 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London, UK

    Tim G. Benton

Authors
  1. Tim G. Benton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim G. Benton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benton, T.G. Academics can do more to disrupt and reframe the solution space for food system transformation. Nat Food 4, 928–930 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00876-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00876-w

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene