Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A pocket-sized device enables detection of methanol adulteration in alcoholic beverages


Alcoholic drinks contaminated, either accidentally or deliberately, by methanol claimed at least 789 lives in 2019, mostly in Asia. Here, a palm-sized, multi-use sensor–smartphone system is presented for on-demand headspace analysis of beverages. The analyser quantified methanol concentrations in 89 pure and methanol-contaminated alcoholic drinks from 6 continents and performed accurately for 107 consecutive days. This device could help consumers, distillers, law-enforcing authorities and healthcare workers to easily screen methanol in alcoholic beverages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Analyser design.
Fig. 2: Performance in real beverages and laboratory samples.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available as source data or can be requested from the corresponding author.


  1. Knowles, H. Tainted alcohol has led to 20 deaths in Costa Rica, authorities say. The Washington Post (24 July 2019).

  2. Methanol Poisoning Initiative (Oslo University Hospital, Médecins Sans Frontières, accessed 7 May 2020);

  3. Aghababaeian, H., Araghi Ahvazi, L. & Ostadtaghizadeh, A. The methanol poisoning outbreaks in Iran 2018. Alcohol Alcohol. 54, 128–130 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bindler, F., Voges, E. & Laugel, P. The problem of methanol concentration admissible in distilled fruit spirits. Food Addit. Contam. 5, 343–351 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Croitoru, M. D., Topor, E., Fülöp, I. & Fogarasi, E. A survey on the methanol content of home distilled alcoholic beverages in Transylvania (Romania). Acta Med. Marisiensis 59, 206–208 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Regulation No. 2019/787 (European Union, 2019).

  7. Huang, R. et al. Film-based fluorescent sensor for monitoring ethanol–water-mixture composition via vapor sampling. Anal. Chem. 90, 14088–14093 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng, C. et al. Aluminum-doped NiO nanofibers as chemical sensors for selective and sensitive methanol detection. Anal. Methods 11, 575–581 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, A. & Edwards, P. Validate personal air-pollution sensors. Nature 535, 29–31 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van den Broek, J., Abegg, S., Pratsinis, S. E. & Güntner, A. T. Highly selective detection of methanol over ethanol by a handheld gas sensor. Nat. Commun. 10, 4220 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Güntner, A. T., Abegg, S., Wegner, K. & Pratsinis, S. E. Zeolite membranes for highly selective formaldehyde sensors. Sens. Actuators B 257, 916–923 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meilgaard, M. C. Prediction of flavor differences between beers from their chemical composition. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30, 1009–1017 (1982).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tenax ® TA Breakthrough Volume Data (SIS, accessed 28 August 2019);

  14. Paine, A. & Dayan, A. Defining a tolerable concentration of methanol in alcoholic drinks. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 20, 563–568 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Güntner, A. T. et al. Sniffing entrapped humans with sensor arrays. Anal. Chem. 90, 4940–4945 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiou, J., Leung, A. H. H., Lee, H. W. & Wong, W.-t. Rapid testing methods for food contaminants and toxicants. J. Integr. Agric. 14, 2243–2264 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jia, R. et al. Amine-responsive cellulose-based ratiometric fluorescent materials for real-time and visual detection of shrimp and crab freshness. Nat. Commun. 10, 795 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Güntner, A. T., Wied, M., Pineau, N. J. & Pratsinis, S. E. Rapid and selective NH3 sensing by porous CuBr. Adv. Sci. 7, 1903390 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Geankoplis, C. J. Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (Prentice Hall, 2003).

  20. McNair, H. M., Miller, J. M. & Snow, N. H. Basic Gas Chromatography (John Wiley & Sons, 2019).

Download references


We thank the S. Fassbind AG in Oberarth, Switzerland for providing samples of distilled cherry spirit and M. Huber (ETH Zurich) for helping with the gas chromatography analysis of pure beverages. This study was primarily funded by the Particle Technology Laboratory (ETH) and in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation (projects 159763 and 175754; R’Equip grants 170729 and 183298).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.A., S.E.P. and A.T.G. conceived the concept and experiments. S.A. and L.M. performed the experiments and the data evaluation. J.v.d.B. designed and provided the separation column and contributed to the experimental design. S.E.P. and A.T.G. were in charge and advised on all parts of the project. S.A., L.M., J.v.d.B., S.E.P. and A.T.G. co-wrote the paper. All authors gave final approval to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas T. Güntner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A patent application has been submitted that covers the concept of selective methanol detection. Applicant: ETH Zürich; inventors: S.A., J.v.d.B., S.E.P. and A.T.G.; application number: DE2019011109582800; status: pending.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary methods, discussion, references, Figs. 1–13 and Table 1.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Numerical data used to generate graphs in Fig. 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abegg, S., Magro, L., van den Broek, J. et al. A pocket-sized device enables detection of methanol adulteration in alcoholic beverages. Nat Food 1, 351–354 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing