Abstract
Kramers Weyl semimetals are Weyl semimetals that have Weyl points pinned at the time reversal invariant momenta. Recently it has been discovered that all chiral crystals host Weyl points at time reversal invariant momenta, so metals with chiral lattice symmetry all belong to the category of Kramers Weyl semimetals. In this work, we show that due to the chiral lattice symmetry, Kramers Weyl semimetals have the unique longitudinal magnetoelectric effect in which the charge current induced spin and orbital magnetization is parallel to the direction of the current. This feature allows Kramers Weyl semimetals to act as nanoscale quantum solenoids with both orbital and spin magnetization. As the moving electrons of Kramers Weyl semimetal can generate longitudinal magnetization, Kramers Weyl semimetals can be used for new designs of spinorbit torque devices with all electric control of magnetization switching for magnets with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy.
Introduction
Weyl semimetals are nodal topological materials characterised by isolated band touching points, called Weyl points, in 3D momentum space^{1,2,3,4}. Due to the Weyl points, which act as the monopoles of the Berry curvature in the momentum space^{1,2,3,4}, Weyl semimetals exhibit many exotic properties such as the chiral magnetic effect^{5,6,7,8}, the presence of topologically protected Fermi arcs states^{1,2,3,4,9,10}, unconventional quantum oscillations^{11}, and novel optical phenomenon^{12,13,14}. Recently, a new type of Weyl semimetals called Kramers Weyl semimetals (KWS) in chiral crystals have been discovered^{15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24}. Chiral crystals are crystals which lack inversion, mirror and improper rotation symmetries. As a result, a chiral crystal has a definite handedness and can be described by the 11 chiral point groups. It was shown that generally, due to the low lattice symmetry, band splittings appear away from timereversal invariant points in momentum space and result in Kramers Weyl points pinned at timereversal invariant momenta. However, it is not clear how the properties of KWS are distinct from that of other Weyl semimetals with nonchiral point group symmetry.
In this work, we point out that the chiral lattice symmetry in KWS brings about a unique property: an electric field applied along the principal symmetry axis of the crystal would induce spin and orbital magnetization which is parallel to the applied electric field. This is in sharp contrast to the case of all other noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetals which give zero magnetoelectric response if the electric field is applied along the principal symmetry axis. This distinctive longitudinal magnetoelectric response involves both the spin^{25} and orbital magnetization^{26,27}, and it arises from the special form of the spinorbit coupling (SOC) of KWS. Importantly, for the representative KWS K_{2}Sn_{2}O_{3} and RhSn in the T point group we considered, the induced magnetization at a given electric field can be two to three orders of magnitude larger than the magnetization induced in materials with the strong Rashba spinorbit couplings such as in Au (111) surfaces and Bi/Ag bilayers^{28,29}. Therefore, if the electrons which carry both orbital and spin angular momentum in the KWS are injected into a ferromagnetic layer, the torque induced by the electrons can cause magnetization switching in the ferromagnetic layer. As a result, we propose a KWS based magnetization switching device that is different from the magnetic tunneling device based on spin transfer torque^{30,31} and the conventional spin orbit torque devices^{30,31,32,33}. The new KWS based devices allow all electric control of magnetic switching for ferromagnets with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, which is important for high density magnetic memories.
Results
Effective Hamiltonians for Kramers Weyl semimetals
In chiral crystals which respect time reversal symmetry, the energy bands are at least doubly degenerate at timereversal invariant momenta due to the Kramers theorem. In the absence of inversion, mirror and improper rotation symmetries in chiral crystals, and away from the timereversal invariant points, SOC would lift the Kramers degeneracy in momentum space to create Kramers Weyl points^{18}. To be more specific, in the spin \(\frac{1}{2}\) basis \({\psi }_{{\boldsymbol{k}}}={[{\phi }_{{\boldsymbol{k}},\uparrow },{\phi }_{{\boldsymbol{k}},\downarrow }]}^{{\rm{T}}}\), which satisfies the relation Θψ_{k} = iσ_{y}ψ_{−k} under timereversal operation Θ = iσ_{y}K, the effective Hamiltonian \({H}_{0}\left({\boldsymbol{k}}\right)\) can be obtained through standard k ⋅ p method^{18}. Up to second order near a timereversal invariant momentum k_{0}, the general form of the Kramers Weyl Hamiltonian can be written as
Here, k is measured from k_{0}, i, j = x, y, z, m_{ij} is the effective mass tensor, σ_{i} are the Pauli matrices in spin space, and v_{ij} is the SOC pseudotensor. In chiral crystals, the little group at k_{0} is isomorphic to a chiral point group which guarantees \(\det \left(v\right)\;\ne\; 0\) so that the Kramers Weyl point emerges at k = 0.
In the KWS, the specific forms of the SOC that creates the Weyl point are determined by the point group symmetry as \(v=\det \left(\hat{R}\right)\hat{R}v{\hat{R}}^{{\rm{T}}}\), with \(\hat{R}\) the symmetry transformation matrix. In materials within the cubic point group \(\left\{{\rm{T}},{\rm{O}}\right\}\) such as K_{2}Sn_{2}O_{3}^{18}, RhSi^{19}, CoSi^{19,20,21}, AlPt^{22}, PtGa^{23}, and PdGa^{24} of cubic chiral B20 structure^{34}, at k_{0} (such as the Γ point) the little group isomorphic to \(\left\{{\rm{T}},{\rm{O}}\right\}\) can give rise to the isotropic Weyl Hamiltonian
where the high symmetry cubic point group \(\left\{{\rm{T}},{\rm{O}}\right\}\) forces v_{ij} to be proportional to the identity matrix. In those materials within the point group \(\left\{{\rm{T}},{\rm{O}}\right\}\), the high symmetry may also enable extra multifold point degeneracies to appear at k_{0}^{15,16,17}. In the materials CsCuBr_{3}^{18}, elemental Te, Se^{35,36,37,38}, etc., the dihedral point group there has lower crystal symmetry and allows the anisotropy to show up in the Weyl Hamiltonian
In the materials belonging to the cyclic point group, as the crystal symmetry is further reduced, the constraints on the SOC is further reduced. The complete forms of the SOC pseudotensor v_{ij} in the KWS Hamiltonian are summarised in the Supplementary Table 1 for all the chiral point groups.
The SOC in the KWS creates the Kramers Weyl points at the time reversal invariant momenta and allows the coupling between the spin and momentum. Under an electric field, the SOC enables the charge carriers to have net magnetization and such magnetoelectric response respects the same crystal symmetry present in the SOC. As shown below, for materials with cubic point groups \(\left\{{\rm{T}},{\rm{O}}\right\}\), the simple form of the isotropic Weyl Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) allows us to calculate the magnetoelectric susceptibility analytically. For the KWS in dihedral and cyclic point group, the magnetoelectric responses are calculated numerically for the selected materials in Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Note 2 respectively.
Magnetoelectric pseudotensors and their symmetry properties
In magnetoelectric effects, induced magnetization M and the applied electric field E are related by the magnetoelectric pseudotensor α such that:
where i, j = x, y, z and α_{ij} are elements of the magnetoelectric pseudotensor α. For a generic Hamiltonian
where \({c}_{\nu ,{\boldsymbol{k}}}^{\dagger }({c}_{\nu ,{\boldsymbol{k}}})\) is the creation (annihilation) operator, \({H}_{0,\nu \nu ^{\prime} }\left({\boldsymbol{k}}\right)\) is the element of the Hamiltonian matrix \({H}_{0}\left({\boldsymbol{k}}\right)\), α_{ij} can be obtained from the linear response theory as^{26,27}
In Eq. (6), \(f\left({E}_{n{\boldsymbol{k}}}\right)\) is the Fermi Dirac distribution function, E_{nk} is the energy dispersion of band n from the Hamiltonian \({H}_{0}\left({\boldsymbol{k}}\right)\), \({v}_{n{\boldsymbol{k}},j}=\frac{\partial {E}_{n{\boldsymbol{k}}}}{\partial {k}_{j}}\), d is the dimension of the system, τ is the effective scattering time and i, j = x, y, z denote the spatial components. The total magnetic moment M_{nk} = S_{nk} + m_{nk} carried by the Bloch electrons consists of both the spin magnetic moment \({{\boldsymbol{S}}}_{n{\boldsymbol{k}}}=\langle {\phi }_{{\boldsymbol{k}},n}\frac{1}{2}g{\mu }_{{\rm{b}}}{\boldsymbol{\sigma }}{\phi }_{{\boldsymbol{k}},n}\rangle\) and the orbital magnetic moment \({{\boldsymbol{m}}}_{n{\boldsymbol{k}}}=\frac{ie}{2\hslash }\langle {\partial }_{{\boldsymbol{k}}}{\phi }_{{\boldsymbol{k}},n}\times [{H}_{0}\left({\boldsymbol{k}}\right){E}_{n{\boldsymbol{k}}}]{\partial }_{{\boldsymbol{k}}}{\phi }_{{\boldsymbol{k}},n}\rangle\). Here, \({\mu }_{{\rm{b}}}=\frac{e\hslash }{2{m}_{{\rm{e}}}}\) is the Bohr magneton, g is the Lande g factor which is set to be 2 in our calculations and \({\phi }_{{\boldsymbol{k}},n}\rangle\) denotes a Bloch state. As we will show explicitly below, the orbital magnetization is related to the Berry curvature of the Bloch states which has the form \({{\mathbf{\Omega }}}_{n{\boldsymbol{k}}}=i\langle {\partial }_{{\boldsymbol{k}}}{\phi }_{{\boldsymbol{k}},n}\times {\partial }_{{\boldsymbol{k}}}{\phi }_{{\boldsymbol{k}},n}\rangle\)^{39}.
The linear response theory applies to generic Hamiltonians. However, to shed light on the general properties of KWS, we note that the form of α can be determined by point group symmetries which is independent of the details of the Hamiltonian. The group theory analysis of α is elaborated in the Method Section as well as in Ref. ^{40}, and the general form for the chiral point groups is provided in Table 1. From the group theory point of view, KWS can be classified into three subclasses. For KWS belonging to the cubic point groups \(\left\{{\rm{T}},{\rm{O}}\right\}\), α is proportional to the identity matrix as shown in Table 1. This implies that the induced magnetization is always parallel to the direction of the applied electric field. Therefore, these KWS can behave as classical solenoids in all electric field directions without the need to fabricate any spiral structures.
For KWS with point groups D_{n}, a pure longitudinal magnetization parallel to the electric field is also obtained when the electric field is applied along the direction of any of the symmetry axes. For KWS with cyclic point groups, in general, magnetization with both components parallel and perpendicular to the direction of the applied electric field are generated. Interestingly, for all other Weyl semimetals without chiral point group symmetry, the magnetoelectric response is zero if the electric field is applied along the principal axis, which can be obtained from the Supplementary Table 1. Therefore, the longitudinal magnetoelectric response along the principal symmetry axis is a very distinctive feature of KWS due to the special spin texture of KWS which determines the spin and orbital magnetization.
Combined with the effective Hamiltonian for isotropic KWS in Eq. (2), the magnetoelectric susceptibility in Eq. (6) can be explicitly calculated and it shows how the SOC strength and band dispersion will influence the magnetoelectric response.
Longitudinal magnetoelectric response in KWS
We first consider an effective Hamiltonian which describes a Kramers Weyl point near the Γ point in chiral crystals with point groups \(\left\{{\rm{T}},{\rm{O}}\right\}\), where the isotropic Weyl Hamiltonian is \({H}_{0}\left({\boldsymbol{k}}\right)=\frac{{\hslash }^{2}}{2m}{{\boldsymbol{k}}}^{2}+\hslash v{\boldsymbol{k}}\cdot {\boldsymbol{\sigma }}\). At the Fermi energy \({E}_{{\rm{F}}}=\frac{{\hslash }^{2}}{2m}{{\boldsymbol{k}}}_{{\rm{F}}}^{2}\pm \hslash v {{\boldsymbol{k}}}_{{\rm{F}}}\), there are two spherical Fermi surfaces with corresponding wave vectors \({{\boldsymbol{k}}}_{{\rm{F}}\pm }={k}_{{\rm{F}}\pm }\hat{{\boldsymbol{k}}}\), where \({k}_{{\rm{F}}\pm }=\frac{1}{\hslash }\sqrt{2m{E}_{{\rm{F}}}+{m}^{2}{v}^{2}}\mp \frac{mv}{\hslash }\) and \(\hat{{\boldsymbol{k}}}=\frac{{\boldsymbol{k}}}{ {\boldsymbol{k}} }\). The spin and orbital magnetic moments of the two Fermi surfaces with Fermi momenta k_{F±} can be written as
It is important to note that the orbital magnetic moment \({{\boldsymbol{m}}}_{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}_{{\rm{F}}}\pm }\) is proportional to the Berry curvature generated by the Weyl point inside Fermi surfaces which is \({{\mathbf{\Omega }}}_{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}_{{\rm{F}}\pm }}=\mp \frac{{\hat{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}_{{\rm{F}}\pm }}{2{{\boldsymbol{k}}}_{{\rm{F}}}^{2}\pm }\). The spin texture on a Fermi surface is schematically shown in Fig. 1a. It is clear that without breaking timereversal symmetry, the total magnetic moment of all the electrons is zero. By applying an electric field, the steady state distribution of the electronic state can generate a net magnetization as indicated in Eq. (6). With this special form of spin texture of an isotropic KWS, at the Fermi energy E_{F}, we obtain the isotropic longitudinal magnetoelectric susceptibility α_{0} as (see the method section for detailed derivation)
In α_{0}, the first and second terms are the spin and the orbital contributions respectively. It is important to note that, for hole bands with negative effective mass, the spin and orbital contribution will always add together to enhance the magnetoelectric response. From Table 1, the magnetoelectric response of an isotropic KWS can be written as M = α_{0}E which indicates that the magnetization induced is parallel to the applied electric field as is schematically shown in Fig. 1b. From Eq. (8), it is clear that strong Weyl SOC v, long scattering time τ and large effective mass m can give large magnetoelectric response.
To acquire a strong magnetoelectric response, it is also preferable to have long scattering time as shown in Eq. (8). In KWS, since the Kramers Weyl points are pinned at the time reversal invariant momenta, the electrons on opposite sides of the Weyl point have opposite spin. As a result, for elastic back scattering from scalar impurities, the intra Weyl pocket scattering is suppressed by the SOC, similar to the case in the surface states of topological insulators^{41,42,43}. For an ideal KWS that only has Fermi surfaces enclosing the Weyl point at time reversal invariant momenta, the Weyl SOC can enhance the scattering time by a factor of 3 as shown in the method section using Born approximation. Therefore, we choose a scattering time τ = 1ps, which is in the range of the inter Weyl point scattering time in TaAs^{29,44,45}. With the effective mass m = 1.4m_{e}, Weyl SOC strength ℏv = −70 meV ⋅ nm, the KWS have the band dispersion shown in Fig. 1c. The isotropic magnetoelectric susceptibility α_{0} as a function of Fermi energy E_{F} is then evaluated as shown in Fig. 1d. For the Fermi pockets enclosing a single Kramers Weyl point, the isotropic magnetoelectric susceptibility α_{0} increases with the square root of the Fermi energy E_{F}.
To seek a large magnetoelectric response from realistic materials, we study two representative materials in the T point group: the K_{2}Sn_{2}O_{3}^{18}, the RhSn^{34}. The K_{2}Sn_{2}O_{3} is a small gap insulator with a Kramers Weyl point at H near the conduction band bottom. Around the Kramers Weyl point, the conduction bands of K_{2}Sn_{2}O_{3} have large spin splitting shown in Fig. 2a. In the slight ndoped state, the electrons will occupy the Fermi pockets enclosing the single Kramers Weyl point at H so that the isotropic Weyl Hamiltonian can be effectively described by Eq. (2), with the effective mass m = 1.4 m_{e} and SOC strength ℏv = −70 meV ⋅ nm. To validate the calculations using an effective Hamiltonian in the form of Eq. (2), a realistic tightbinding model for K_{2}Sn_{2}O_{3} is further constructed (see the method section) to calculate the magnetoelectric susceptibility α_{0}, as is shown in Fig. 2b. Below E = 0.7eV, only the Weyl bands enclosing the Kramers Weyl point at H are involved so that the numerically calculated magnetoelectric susceptibility matches well with the analytical formula in Eq. (8). It is interesting to note that there is a fourfold fermion around the energy E = 0.75 eV. As the Fermi surfaces enclosing multifold fermion also contribute to the magnetoelectric susceptibility α_{0}^{46}, the fourfold fermion at H point induce a sudden increase of α_{0} when the chemical potential is above 0.7eV. Assuming that the chemical potential lies at E = 0.6eV (about 80 meV above the Weyl point), an electric field of 10^{5}V/m is enough to generate a magnetization of 0.005μ_{b} per unit cell.
On the other hand, RhSn, which has the same B20 structure as the recently studied KWS RhSi^{19}, is semimetallic. The SOC generates the Kramers Weyl points at Γ as well as other multifold fermion band crossing points ^{15,16,17} at the time reversal invariant momenta as shown in Fig. 3a. A fourfold fermion band crossing point near the Fermi energy is highlighted by a red circle in Fig. 3a. With the realistic tight binding model constructed from Wannier functions (see the “method” section), the magnetoelectric susceptibility α_{0} is calculated in the energy range including all the bands. The results are shown in Fig. 3b. At the Fermi energy, which is near the multifold fermion Weyl point, an electric field of 10^{5}V/m can generate a magnetization of 0.007μ_{b} per unit cell . Compared with the magnetoelectric response of Au(111) surface and Bi/Ag bilayers which have large Rashba SOC^{28,29}, the K_{2}Sn_{2}O_{3} and RhSn can generate magnetizations which are two to three orders of magnitude larger.
For KWS with dihedral (D_{n}) point groups, such as CsCuBr_{3}^{18}, and elemental Te, Se^{35,36,37,38}, a pure longitudinal magnetoelectric response can also be obtained when the electric field is applied along the direction of the symmetry axes. On the other hand, for KWS with cyclic (C_{n}) point groups, such as Ca_{2}B_{5}Os_{3}, a longitudinal magnetoelectric response is generally accompanied with a transverse response. The calculations of magnetoelectric tensors for CsCuBr_{3} with D_{2} point group and Ca_{2}B_{5}Os_{3} with C_{2} point group can be found in the Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Note 2 respectively.
Discussion
We note that the current induced magnetization in Weyl semimetals was first studied by Johansson et al. in TaAs which belong to the point group C_{4v} with mirror planes^{29}. Therefore, the Weyl points appear at general k points and the resulting spin polarization induced by an electric field is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field. This transverse magnetoelectric effect is similar to the case with Rashba SOC^{25} which is a property of the polar point group as shown in Supplementary Table 1. If the applied electric field is along the principal axis, however, the magnetoelectric response is zero in TaAs as determined by the C_{4v} point group symmetry.
On the other hand, the longitudinal magnetoelectric response in Weyl semimetals was first studied by Yoda et al.^{47,48}. However, in their models, helical hopping textures^{47,48} are needed for electrons to hop in a spiral manner, imitating the movement of electrons in a classical solenoid. As a result, an orbital magnetization parallel to the direction of an applied electric field would be generated and the longitudinal magnetization is present even without spinorbit coupling. Unfortunately, no realistic materials that possess such helical hopping textures are identified.
In this work, the finite longitudinal magnetoelecrtric response comes from the current induced net magnetic moments accumulation on Fermi surfaces of the KWS. The net magnetic moments on Fermi surfaces basically have two origins: (1) the SOC induced spin splitting; (2) the finite orbital magnetic moment distribution on Fermi surfaces. The twofold Kramers Weyl point we focused on in this work contributes to both the spin and orbital magnetic moments, but for a general KWS of chiral crystal symmetry, the complicated band structure diversifies the origin of magnetic moments on Fermi surfaces.
As we have seen, the Fermi pockets enclosing multifold fermion contribute to the magnetoelectric susceptibility as well. It is due to the fact that multifold fermion endows orbital magnetic moments to the Fermi surfaces outside. Along with the SOC induced spin splitting, the Fermi pockets enclosing multifold fermion can also give rise to spin and orbital magnetization driven by charge current^{46}. In a KWS, the magnetoelectric response from the multifold fermion and twofold Kramers Weyl point is the same type as the response tensor form is determined by the chiral crystal symmetry of the KWS. Since the Fermi surfaces with a multifold fermion inside have different magnetic moment, group velocity and density of states from that with a twofold Kramers Weyl point, the magnetoelectric susceptibility can differ in the value for the two cases.
Besides the twofold Kramers Weyl point and multifold fermion at high symmetry points in the Brillouin zone, a Weyl point at a general k point can generate finite longitudinal magnetoelectric susceptibility as long as the crystal symmetry does not reduce it to zero. This is the case of the local maximal magnetoelectric susceptibility α_{0} of RhSn at E = −0.46eV shown in Fig. 3b. There is a Weyl point in Γ − R line around the energy of E = −0.46eV which enhances the magnetoelectric susceptibility at that energy. In a brief summary, the longitudinal magnetoelectric susceptibility in KWS of chiral crystal symmetry originates from SOC and Weyl points in the band structure. The magnitude of longitudinal magnetoelectric response at given current density relies on the Fermi surface magnetic moment, Fermi velocity, effective scattering time and density of states at the Fermi energy of KWS.
Concerning the applications of KWS, due to its unique longitudinal magnetoelectric response, the KWS/ferromagnet heterostructures can be used for new designs of spinorbit torque devices as shown in Fig. 4a. It is interesting to note that a KWS can cause current induced magnetization switching in the ferromagnetic layer by two effects. First, as depicted in Fig. 4a, the KWS can inject electrons which carry both orbital and spin angular momentum into the ferromagnetic layer. The injection of angular momentum can cause magnetization switching similar to the spin transfer torque induced magnetization switching in magnetic tunneling junctions as shown in Fig. 4b. The important difference is that the electrons injected by KWS can carry both orbital and spin angular momentum. Particularly, close to the Weyl points, the orbital magnetization carried by the electrons can be significant. Therefore, KWS can work as a source of spin and orbital angular momentum for magnetization switching. Second, when a current is passed along the principal symmetry axis of the KWS, a magnetization is induced at interface between the KWS and the ferromagnet. This current induced magnetization can cause the magnetization switching of the ferromagnet layer through ferromagnetic coupling between the KWS and the ferromagnet.
In recent years, tremendous progress has been made for the study of spinorbit torque devices as depicted in Fig. 4c. For example, current induced magnetization switching due to spinorbit torques, in the presence of an inplane magnetic field, has been realized experimentally in heavy metal/ferromagnet heterostructures^{49,50}. It was also demonstrated that charge currents in multilayer WTe_{2} can induce outofplane magnetizations^{32} and WTe_{2} can also be used for magnetization switching for ferromagnets with inplane anisotropy^{51}. However, an all electric control of magnetization switching for ferromagnets with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) through spinorbit torques, which is important for high density magnetic memories, has not been experimentally realized. Therefore, due to the unique longitudinal response of KWS, they allow new designs of spintronic devices for magnetization switching of ferromagnets with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy as depicted in Fig. 4a.
Concerning the candidate materials of KWS, the cubic chiral B20 structured materials^{34}, such as the recent experimentally studied RhSi^{19}, CoSi^{19,20,21}, AlPt^{22}, PtGa^{23}, PdGa^{24}, and RhGe, RhSn all belong to the T point group that has the isotropic longitudinal magnetoelectric response. Particularly, the PtGa^{23} that has the strongest SOC reported so far in chiral crystals is expected to produce strong longitudinal magnetoelectric effect. Besides, elemental Se and Te also have chiral lattice structure^{35,36}. Interestingly, a few superconducting materials with chiral lattice symmetry and strong spinorbit coupling such as Li_{2}Pt_{3}B^{52}, Li_{2}Pd_{3}B^{53}, Mo_{3}Al_{2}C^{54}, TaRh_{2}B_{2} and NbRh_{2}B_{2}^{55} have been experimentally studied. In their normal state, these superconducting materials can also have spintronic applications.
In conclusion, the magnetoelectric effect of KWS are studied in this work using three different methods: 1. Group theory analysis; 2. Analytical calculations through linear response theory; and 3. Realistic tightbinding calculations are constructed through first principle calculations and the magnetoelectric response of realistic materials are calculated. A new design for currentcontrolled magnet memory device is proposed and new candidates of KWS are suggested.
Methods
Symmetry analysis for the magnetoelectric response in Chiral crystals
In the chiral crystals with magnetoelectric effect M_{i} = ∑_{i,j}α_{ij}E_{j} with i, j = x, y, z, under the crystal symmetry the magnetization transforms as \({M}_{i}\to \det \left(\hat{R}\right){\hat{R}}_{ij}{M}_{j}\) while the electric field transforms as \({E}_{i}\to {\hat{R}}_{ij}{E}_{j}\), where \(\hat{R}\) represents the symmetry transformation operator and is an orthogonal matrix. As a result, the magnetoelectric susceptibility α_{ij} under the crystal symmetry respects
The chiral point groups, which do not allow improper rotations, can be divided into three subclasses: the cubic point groups \(\left\{{\rm{T}},{\rm{O}}\right\}\), the dihedral point groups \(\left\{{{\rm{D}}}_{n}\right\}\) with n = 2, 3, 4, 6 and the cyclic point groups C_{n} with n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 6. In the cubic point groups \(\left\{{\rm{T}},{\rm{O}}\right\}\), the multiple high order rotation axes along different directions would force the magnetoelectric susceptibility to be proportional to the identity matrix. In the dihedral point groups \(\left\{{{\rm{D}}}_{n}\right\}\) with n = 2, 3, 4, 6, the C_{n} rotation axis along z and the inplane C_{2} rotation axis along the xaxis would eliminate all the off diagonal elements and leave only the diagonal elements in the magnetoelectric susceptibility \(\alpha ={\rm{diag}}\left\{{\alpha }_{xx},{\alpha }_{yy},{\alpha }_{zz}\right\}\). In \(\left\{{{\rm{D}}}_{3},{{\rm{D}}}_{4},{{\rm{D}}}_{6}\right\}\), the principal axis would further make α_{xx} = α_{yy}. In the cyclic point groups \(\left\{{{\rm{C}}}_{n}\right\}\) with n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, the lower symmetry would allow the offdiagonal elements to coexist with the diagonal elements. The explicit forms of the magnetoelectric susceptibility pseudotensor α_{ij} from the symmetry analysis is shown in Table 1 for the 11 chiral point groups.
Magnetoelectric susceptibility in isotropic KWS
In the isotropic KWS, at the Fermi energy \({E}_{{\rm{F}}}=\frac{{\hslash }^{2}{{\boldsymbol{k}}}^{2}}{2m}\pm \hslash v {\boldsymbol{k}}\), there are two spherical Fermi surfaces with the corresponding wave vectors \({{\boldsymbol{k}}}_{{\rm{F}}\pm }={k}_{{\rm{F}}\pm }\hat{{\boldsymbol{k}}}\) and \({k}_{{\rm{F}}}=\frac{1}{\hslash }\left(\sqrt{2m{E}_{{\rm{F}}}+{m}^{2}{v}^{2}}\mp mv\right)\), \(\hat{{\boldsymbol{k}}}=\frac{{\boldsymbol{k}}}{ {\boldsymbol{k}} }\). On the Fermi surfaces enclosing the Kramers Weyl point, the spin magnetic dipole moment and orbital magnetic dipole moment are respectively
with ± denoting the two band branches. The density of states can be obtained as
and the Fermi velocities there become
At the Fermi energy, the magnetoelectric susceptibility α_{0} can be approximated through \({\sum }_{n}\frac{1}{{\left(2\pi \right)}^{d}}{\int}_{{\rm{BZ}}}...\frac{df\left({E}_{n,{\boldsymbol{k}}}\right)}{d{E}_{n,{\boldsymbol{k}}}}d{\boldsymbol{k}}\to {\sum }_{n}{N}_{n}\left({E}_{{\rm{F}}}\right)\int \frac{d{{{\Omega }}}_{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}_{{\rm{F}},n}}}{4\pi }\) with n = ± and then we can obtain
Isotropic Weyl SOC suppressed back scattering
In the pure scalar potential scattering process
the scattering potential can be projected onto the band basis as
with
and θ, ϕ are the azimuth and polar angle of k. In the presence of large SOC, the scattering is dominated in each band branch \((\pm )\) and the effective scattering potential becomes
In the Born approximation, the scattering in each band branch is obtained as
with \(\varphi =\phi ^{\prime} \phi\), \(\vartheta =\theta ^{\prime} \theta\). In the spherical Fermi surfaces, the scattering potential \({\hat{V}}_{{\boldsymbol{k}}{\boldsymbol{k}}^{\prime} ,\pm }^{2}\) only depends on the angle between k and \({\boldsymbol{k}}^{\prime}\), so
As a result, the Weyl SOC reduces the scattering potential to about 0.3 and suppresses the back scattering.
Firstprinciples calculation and Wannier function construction
We perform firstprinciples calculation within the density functional theory framework as implemented in Vienna Abinitio Simulation Package(VASP)^{56}. PAW^{57,58} type of pseudopotential with PBE exchange functional^{59} is used in the calculations and spin orbit coupling is included in the pseudopotentials. After the firstprinciple calculation is done, tight binding Hamiltonian which perfectly recovers bands near Fermi surface is built through Wannier function construction using package Wannier90^{60,61}. The lattice structures of all the materials we considered are obtained from the ICSD^{62}.
Data availability
The data generated from our codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Wan, X., VishWanath, A. & Savarasov, S. Y. Topological semimetal and Fermiarc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates, Phys, Rev. B 83, (2011).
Balents, L. Weyl electrons kiss. Physics 4, 36 (2011).
Burkov, A. A. & Balents, L. Weyl semimetal in a topological insulator multilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 127205 (2011).
Weng, H., Fang, C., Fang, Z., Bernevig, B. A. & Dai, X. Weyl semimetal phase in noncentrosymmetric transitionmetal monophosphides. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011029 (2015).
Nielsen, H. B. & Ninomiya, M. The AdlerBellJackiw anomaly and Weyl fermions in a crystal. Phys. Lett. B 130, 389 (1983).
Son, D. T. & Yamamoto, N. Berry curvature, triangle anomalies, and the chiral magnetic effect in fermi liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 181602 (2012).
Huang, X. et al. Observation of the chiralanomalyinduced negative magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031023 (2015).
Zhang, C.L. et al. Signatures of the AdlerBellJackiw chiral anomaly in a Weyl fermion semimetal. Nat. Commun. 7, 10735 (2016).
Xu, S.Y. et al. Discovery of a Weyl fermion semimetal and topological Fermi arcs. Science 347, 294 (2015).
Lv, B. Q. et al. Experimental discovery of Weyl semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031013 (2015).
Potter, A. C., Kimchi, I. & Vishwanath, A. Quantum oscillations from surface Fermi arcs in Weyl and Dirac semimetals. Nat. Commun. 5, 5161 (2014).
Chan, C.K., Lee, P.A., Burch, K. S., Han, J. H. & Ran, Y. When chiral photons meet chiral fermions: photoinduced anomalous Hall effects in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 026805 (2016).
Chan, C.K., Linder, N. H., Refael, G. & Lee, P.A. Photocurrents in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 95, 041104(R) (2017).
Juan, F., Grushin, A. G., Morimoto, T. & Moore, J. E. Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimetals. Nat. Commun. 8, 15995 (2017).
Bradlyn, B. et al. Beyond Dirac and Weyl fermions: unconventional quasiparticles in conventional crystals. Science 353, 6299 (2016).
Tang, P., Zhou, Q. & Zhang, S. C. Multiple types of topological fermions in transition metal silicides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 206402 (2017).
Chang, G. et al. Unconventional chiral fermions and large topological fermi arcs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 206401 (2017).
Chang, G. et al. Topological quantum properties of chiral crystals. Nat. Mater. 17, 978–985 (2018).
Sanchez, D. S. et al. Topolotical chiral crystals with helicoidarc quantum states. Nature 567, 500–505 (2019).
Rao, Z. et al. Observation of unconventional chiral fermions with long Fermi arcs in CoSi. Nature 567, 496–499 (2019).
Takane, D. et al. Observation of chiral fermions with a large topological charge and associated Fermiarc surface states in CoSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076402 (2019).
Schroter, N. B. M. et al. Chiral topological semimetal with multifold band crossings and long Fermi arcs. Nat. Phys. 15, 759 (2019).
Yao, M. et al. Observation of giant spinsplit Fermiarc with maximal Chern number in the chiral topological semimetal PtGa. Nat. Commun. 11, 2033 (2020).
Schroter, N. B. M. et al. Observation and control of maximal Chern numbers in a chiral topological semimetal. Science 369, 179 (2020).
Edelstein, V. M. Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in twodimensional asymmetric electron systems. Solid State Commun. 73, 233 (1990).
Zhong, S., Moore, J. E. & Souza, I. Gyrotropic magnetic effect and the magnetic moment on the Fermi surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 077201 (2016).
Ma, J. & Pesin, D. A. Chiral magnetic effect and natural optical activity in metals with or without Weyl points. Phys. Rev. B 92, 235205 (2015).
Johansson, A., Henk, J. & Mertig, I. Theoretical aspects of the Edelstein effect for anisotropic twodimensional electron gas and topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 93, 195440 (2016).
Johansson, A., Henk, J. & Mertig, I. Edelstein effect in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 97, 085417 (2018).
Manchon, A. et al. Currentinduced spinorbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019).
Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Surprises from the spin Hall effect. Phys. Today 70, 38 (2017).
MacNeill, D. et al. Control of spinorbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe_{2}/ferromagnet bilayers. Nat. Phys. 13, 300–305 (2017).
Ciccarelli, C. et al. Roomtemperature spinorbit torque in NiMnSb. Nat. Phys. 12, 855–860 (2016).
Severin, D. A. P. & Burkov, A. T. Electronic Structure of B20 (FeSiType) Transition Metal Monosilicides. Materials 12, 2710 (2019).
Hirayama, M., Okugawa, R., Ishibashi, S., Murakami, S. & Miyake, T. Weyl node and spin texture in trigonal tellurim and selenium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 206401 (2015).
Furukawa, T., Shimokawa, Y., Kobayashi, K. & Itou, T. Observation of current induced bulk magentization in elemental tellurium. Nat. Commun. 8, 954 (2017).
Sakano, M. Radial Spin Texture in Elemental Tellurium with Chiral Crystal Structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 136404 (2020).
Furukawa, T., Watanabe, Y., Ogasawara, N., Kobayashi, K. & Itou, T. ChiralityInduced Electrical Generation of Magnetism in Nonmagnetic Elemental Tellurium. arXiv: 2010.09210.
Xiao, D., Chang, M.C. & Niu, Q. Berry phase effects on electronic properties. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010).
He, W.Y. & Law, K. T. Magnetoelectric effects in gyrotropic superconductors, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012073(R).
Roushan, P. et al. Topological surface states protected from backscattering by chiral spin texture. Nature 60, 1106–1109 (2009).
Zhang, T. et al. Experimental demonstration of topological surface states protected by timereversal symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 266803 (2009).
Lee, W.C., Wu, C., Arovas, D. P. & Zhang, S.C. Quasiparticle interference on the surface of the topological insulator Bi_{2}Te_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 80, 245439 (2009).
Ramshaw, B.J. et al. Quantum limit of transport and destruction of the Weyl nodes in TaAs. Nat. Commun. 9, 2217 (2018).
Zhang, C.L. et al. Electron scattering in tantalum monoarsenide. Phys. Rev. B 95, 085202 (2017).
Flicker, F. et al. Chiral optical response of multifold fermions. Phys. Rev. B 98, 155145 (2018).
Yoda, T., Yokoyama, T. & Murakami, S. Currentinduced orbital and spin magnetizations in crystals with helical structure. Sci. Rep. 5, 12024 \(2015).
Yoda, T., Yokoyama, T. & Murakami, S. Orbital Edelstein effect as a condensedmatter analog of solenoid. Nano. Lett. 18, 916–920 (2018).
Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by inplane current injection. Nature 476, 189–193 (2011).
Li, P. et al. Spinorbit torqueassisted switching in magnetic insulator thin films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. Nat. Commun. 7, 12688 (2016).
Li, S. et al. Allelectric magentization switching and DzyaloshinskiiMoriya interaction in WTe_{2}/ferromagnet heterostructures. Nat. Nanotech. 14, 945–949 (2019).
Yuan, H. Q. Swave spintriplet order in superconductors without inversion symmetry: Li_{2}Pd_{3}B and Li_{2}Pt_{3}B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 017006 (2006).
Togano, K. et al. Superconductivity in the metal rich LiPdB ternary boride. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 247004 (2004).
Karki, A. B. et al. Structure and physical properties of the noncentrosymmetric superconductor Mo_{3}Al_{2}C. Phys. Rev. B 82, 064512 (2010).
Carnicom, E. M. et al. TaRh_{2}B_{2} and NbRh_{2}B_{2}: Superconductors with a chiral noncentrosymmetric crystal structure. Sci. Adv. 4, 7969 (2018).
Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficiency of abinitio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a planewave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Blochl, P. E. Projector augmentedwave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmentedwave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1798 (1999).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
Souza, I., Marzari, N. & Vanderbilt, D. Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands. Phys. Rev. B 65, 035109 (2001).
Mostofi, A. A. et al. Wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximallylocalised Wannier functions. Comput. Phys. Common. 178, 685–699 (2008).
Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (FIZ Karlsruhe, 2014); http://icsd.fizkarlsruhe.de/icsd
Acknowledgements
We thank Xi Dai, Kin Fai Mak, Qiming Shao and Binghai Yan for inspiring discussions. K.T.L. is thankful for the support of HKRGC through C602616W, 16324216, 16307117 and 16309718. K.T.L. is further supported by the Croucher Foundation and the Dr. Taichin Lo Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.T.L. and W.Y.H. conceived the idea and initiated the project. W.Y.H. performed the symmetry analysis and the theoretical calculation of the magnetoelectric susceptibility. X.Y.X. performed the first principles calculation and Wannier function construction for the selected Kramers Weyl semimetals in this work. All the authors discussed the results and cowrote the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
He, WY., Xu, X.Y. & Law, K.T. Kramers Weyl semimetals as quantum solenoids and their applications in spinorbit torque devices. Commun Phys 4, 66 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4200502100564w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s4200502100564w
This article is cited by

Kramers nodal line metals
Nature Communications (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.