Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Mechanochemical synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles

Abstract

In the last decades, mechanochemical processing has emerged as a sustainable method for the large-scale production of a variety of nanomaterials. In particular, mechanochemical synthesis can afford well-dispersed metal-oxide nanoparticles, which are used in wide-ranging applications including energy storage and conversion, environmental monitoring, or biomedical uses. This article reviews recent progress in the mechanochemical synthesis of metal-oxide nanoparticles, explores reaction mechanisms, and contrasts the influence of chosen process parameters on the properties of end products. The role of choice of reaction pathway, as well as advantages and limitations compared to other synthesis methods are discussed. A prospect for future development of this synthetic method is proposed.

Introduction

Nanoparticles are a new class of engineering materials. They are small particulate materials with a characteristic length scale of < 100 nm. Nanoparticles exhibit new or enhanced size-dependent properties compared with the larger counterparts of the same material. The unique properties are governed by the size and shape of the nanoparticles. Thus, the control of size and shape enables the design of nanoparticles with specific properties desired in their applications. Owing to these unique properties of nanoparticles and recent development in their synthesis methods, the current and potential applications of nanoparticles are rapidly growing. Among many types of nanoparticles, metal-oxide nanoparticles are widely used in an extremely broad range of industries, including the manufacture of integrated circuits, biomedical and cancer treatment, renewable energy, environmental protection, pharmaceuticals, personal care, surface coatings, plastics, textiles, food, building materials, electronics and automotives1.

A small variety of metal-oxide nanoparticles such as fumed silica and TiO2 pigments have been produced as early as the mid-twentieth century. However, it is in the last three decades that significant research efforts have been made to develop production methods for metal-oxide nanoparticles. As a result, a considerable number of synthesis techniques are currently used in laboratories worldwide. Among them, mechanochemical processing has emerged as a unique technique to produce metal-oxide nanoparticles. Due to the simplicity in the operation parameters, the adaptation of mechanochemical synthesis from lab-benchtop synthesis to commercial-scale production took < 8 years. In the last few years, the awareness towards the potential environmental benefits of mechanochemistry has increased; mechanochemical processing allows chemical reactions that normally occur at elevated temperatures, to be induced at near-room temperature without the use of organic solvent. This article reviews the recent progress in the mechanochemical processing of metal-oxide nanoparticles. It discusses the uniqueness of mechanochemical synthesis techniques, the importance of selecting appropriate reaction pathways, and the roles of process parameters that govern the properties of resulting nanoparticles. This article focuses on the production of well-separated metal-oxide nanoparticles via mechanochemical activation of solid-state displacement reactions. The synthesis of nano-grained, nanostructured or highly aggregated metal oxides by mechanochemical means are outside the scope of this article2,3. We first discuss the mechanochemical synthesis of nanomaterials and then review the applications of mechanochemistry to the production of a variety of metal-oxide nanoparticles.

Mechanochemical synthesis

Mechanochemical processing

Mechanochemistry is concerned with the chemical reactions and structural changes induced by mechanical energy4. Mechanochemistry has been utilised by humans for millenniums5,6. In the modern world, many industries embrace this technology, including mining, building, pharmaceutical and manufacturing sectors6. The first systematic investigation of mechanochemistry was conducted in the nineteenth century7, and mechanochemistry was recognised as a branch of chemistry by Wilhelm Ostwald around the turn of the twentieth century. Since then, the discipline has been made steady progress. However, it is due to its aspects of green chemistry that mechanochemistry has seen a recent resurgence8,9,10,11. In 2019, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) named mechanochemistry as one of the top ‘10 chemical innovations that will change our world’, in honour of IUPAC’s 100th anniversary12.

The advancement of modern technology realised different types of high-energy ball mills with mechanical energy output (energy density) high enough to induce many chemical reactions. As such, in mechanochemistry, ball mills are often utilised as a chemical reactor. Because of this reason, mechanochemical processing is also called ‘reactive milling’13. Attrition mills, planetary mills and shaker mills are common types of mills used in mechanochemistry. The former two types of mills are also used for the commercial large-scale production of metal-oxide nanoparticles.

The mechanisms to mechanically activate chemical reactions have been the subject of many studies. Mechanical energy input repeatedly causes the shifts of atoms from the equilibrium stable positions and in turn the changes of bond lengths and angles, and, in some cases, the excitation of electron subsystems14. This leads to the creation of defects, amorphization or metastable phases to accumulate energy that is released to rapture chemical bonds and causes chemical reactions5. However, the detailed study on the mechanochemical activation during ball milling is not straightforward, because of the short duration of each collision event and the localised character of the event in terms of heat and pressure15. Nevertheless, in situ measurements have been attempted16,17,18, and thermodynamical analyses19 and kinetic modelling20 have been conducted to understand the reaction processes. Detailed discussions on mechanochemistry are reviewed elsewhere15,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31.

A wide variety of materials have been produced using mechanochemical processing29. They include metals and their alloys, oxides and other chalcogenides, refractory materials such as carbides and silicides, common salts such as carbonates and phosphates32. The ability of mechanochemical processing is not limited to the synthesis of inorganic materials. Metal organic frameworks33, organometallic complexes34,35 and organic compounds29,36 can also be produced using mechanochemistry. Moreover, the production of complex structures37 such as hybrid materials consisting of a core of inorganic materials and a shell of organic materials38 was demonstrated by mechanochemical processing. The usefulness of mechanochemical processing to produce nanostructured materials was also recognised at an early development stage of nanotechnology39.

Application of mechanochemical processing to the synthesis of nanoparticles

The methods to synthesise nanoparticles are commonly classified into two approaches; top-down and bottom-up1. Top-down approaches are an extension of the traditional methods used to produce ultrafine powders from bulk raw materials by grinding them down to smaller pieces40, either in air, in a liquid media41 or in a solid diluent phase. In bottom-up approaches, nanoparticles are formed from small building blocks such as atoms or molecules under vacuum or in a gas, liquid or solid media. Mechanochemical processing is one of the bottom-up approaches to synthesise nanoparticles.

Mechanical pulverisation (top-down approach) is occasionally misunderstood as mechanochemical processing. For example, one of the ways to obtain metal-oxide nanoparticles is the pulverisation of precursor materials by ball milling in a solid matrix and subsequent heat treatment to decompose the precursors into metal oxides42,43,44,45,46,47. However, unless chemical changes are induced to the precursor particles during milling, the process is not mechanochemical. Likewise, mechanochemical processing is often misunderstood as a top-down approach, due to the grinding process involved48. The grinding process is involved in mechanochemical processing only to the pulverisation of raw reactant materials. The essence of mechanochemical processing is the induction of chemical reactions between raw materials by the input of mechanical energy49,50.

During ball/powder collision events, repeated deformation, fracture and welding of reactant materials occur. This leads to the formation of a nanoscale composite structure of the reactant materials48. Within the nanocomposite structure, chemical reactions are initiated across the grain boundaries of the adjoining reactant phases. This condition drastically enhances the reaction kinetics mainly in the following three aspects. Firstly, nanoscale grain sizes significantly reduce the diffusion length of reactant atoms51. Secondly, the high residual energy in the form of structural defects or radicals in the reactant nanocomposite reduces the reaction threshold energy. Thirdly, repeated welding and fracture of raw materials continuously generates fresh reaction surfaces. Thus, mechanochemical processing enables the near-room-temperature induction of chemical reactions that otherwise occur only at elevated temperatures after prolonged heat treatment (Fig. 1). Even in the cases where the chemical reaction does not complete during milling, the reaction can be completed by post-milling heat treatment at only moderate temperatures, because the reaction threshold energy is substantially lowered during mechanical treatment. The theoretical analysis of mechanochemically induced reaction process was reported elsewhere52,53,54.

Fig. 1: Typical steps of mechanochemical processing to produce nanoparticles via a solid-state displacement reaction.
figure1

a Dry raw reactant materials are placed in a milling container along with milling balls. b During ball milling, repeated fracture and welding of the raw materials result in the formation of a nanocomposite of the reactants. c Mechanical energy input into the reactant nanocomposite induces a chemical reaction to produce nanoparticles in a solid matrix48 (reproduced with permission from Springer). d If necessary, post-milling heat treatment is conducted to complete the chemical reaction or to control the size, shape or crystallinity of nanoparticles. e Soluble by-product matrix phase is removed. f Final nanoparticle products.

In dry mechanochemical synthesis of nanoparticles, solid-state displacement reactions are often utilised55,56. The reaction is represented by the following equation:

$${{{{{{{\mathrm{A}}}}}}}}^ + {{{{{{{\mathrm{B}}}}}}}}^ - + {{{{{{{\mathrm{C}}}}}}}}^ + {{{{{{{\mathrm{D}}}}}}}}^ - \to {{{{{{{\mathrm{A}}}}}}}}^ + {{{{{{{\mathrm{D}}}}}}}}^ - + {{{{{{{\mathrm{C}}}}}}}}^ + {{{{{{{\mathrm{B}}}}}}}}^ -$$
(1)

Often dry-powder forms of raw materials are used. Mechanochemical processing of the raw materials results in the solid-state precipitation of nanoparticles in a solid by-product matrix. Upon completion of the reaction, nanoparticles can be collected by selectively removing the by-product matrix phase.

Advantages and limitations of the mechanochemical synthesis of nanoparticles

The aspects of green chemistry are regarded as the advantage of mechanochemical synthesis. Mechanochemical processing allows the production of metal-oxide nanoparticles without using organic solvents or high temperatures, thus has the potential in reducing environmental footprint8,9. In contrast, many liquid-phase synthesis techniques require organic solvents and vapour-phase synthesis uses organic precursors. Water-based liquid-phase synthesis tends to have a high reaction rate that causes difficulty in the precise control of particle-size distribution without the use of surfactants1. Nevertheless, high-energy ball milling may require high-energy consumption57. A detailed comparison in environmental benefits between different bottom-up approaches to obtain metal-oxide nanoparticles should be conducted using a rigorous life-cycle analysis58. Nevertheless, it was demonstrated that the mechano-synthesis of organometallic species displays a low E-factor and low-process mass intensity compared to conventional solution methods59.

Another advantage of mechanochemical techniques is that it allows the formation of nanoparticles with a low degree of agglomeration (Fig. 2). This is possible because a solid by-product matrix acts as a physical barrier between particles during the particle-growth stage. In contrast, the liquid- or vapour-phase synthesis of nanoparticles can lead to particle agglomeration because of the lack of a solid physical barrier between particles during the particle-growth stage. Liquid-phase synthesis methods can utilise surfactants or micelles to inhibit particle agglomeration, but the use of surfactants or micelles leads to limited options in the surface treatment of nanoparticles at the application stage. Without a solid barrier, liquid- or vapour-phase synthesis needs to resort to highly diluted conditions to produce nanoparticles to avoid particle agglomeration, which leads to a decreased product yield.

Fig. 2: Mechanochemically synthesised γ-Fe2O3 single-crystalline nanoparticles93.
figure2

a Transmission electron micrograph. b Particle-size distribution obtained from electron micrographs. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.

Mechanochemial synthesis has other advantages such as relatively simple operation, ease of scale-up, and ease to create a uniform reaction environment that leads to uniform size and shape of nanoparticles55,56. In contrast, when liquid-phase techniques are scaled-up, the reaction environment is often larger than the size of a beaker and its homogeneity becomes an issue.

The disadvantages of mechanochemical synthesis over other methods include the following:

  • The end products are subject to contamination from the by-product phase, milling balls or milling containers. In contrast, vapour-phase synthesis can produce metal-oxide nanoparticles with extremely high purity1.

  • The end product may suffer from low crystallinity, due to the residual defects and amorphization caused by mechanical energy input. In contrast, vapour-phase synthesis can produce metal-oxide nanoparticles with extremely high crystallinity due to the high temperature involved. Although the crystallinity of mechanochemically synthesised particles can be improved by post-milling annealing, the heating process may cause particle agglomeration or the migration of impurities from the by-product phase into nanoparticles1.

  • The production of highly soluble metal oxides that decomposes upon contact with washing liquids, cannot be separated from the by-products easily. For example, B2O3 is soluble in water and many organic solvents, so that the removal of a by-product phase needs to rely on sublimation or other physical means instead of a washing process60.

Influence of production parameters on the characteristics of end products

Ball size

Ball size influences the mechanical energy input. The increase in ball size leads to increased input-energy density per collision event. Thus, generally speaking, larger balls can induce desired chemical reactions in a shorter milling time than smaller balls. The density of milling balls also influences the input-energy density per collision event. However, the choice of materials for milling balls are often limited. In high-energy ball mills, milling balls are often made of the same material as the milling chamber in order to reduce the contamination level arising from the wear of the chamber and balls61. The chambers of industrial high-energy ball mills are often constructed with steel and hence hardened steel balls or stainless steel balls are frequently used61. Ceramic milling balls with a high density, such as tungsten carbide, are commercially available but, due to their brittle nature, a significant amount of ball fragments could contaminate the end products after high-energy ball milling62. Michalchuk et al.63 demonstrated that, for the co-crystallisation of organic compounds, both ball size and ball mass play critical roles in determining the reaction rate. However, to date, there is no similar study reported for the production of metal-oxide nanoparticles.

In some cases, large milling balls input mechanical energy high enough to cause self-propagating exothermic reactions, the so-called combustion events, within the milling vessel64,65. The occurrence of combustion is not desirable for the production of nanoparticles, as the combustion causes a significant temperature increase that results in melting or vaporisation of milled powders or agglomeration of resulting particles66. Therefore, it is critical to suppress the occurrence of combustion for the production of uniform nanoparticles with little agglomeration. Reducing the ball size can delay or eliminate combustion by decreasing the mechanical energy density during ball-to-powder collision events66,67.

Ball size also affects the size of nanoparticles. Smaller balls lead to smaller nanoparticles. This is because (i) smaller milling balls lead to finer grinding of raw materials68 and (ii) smaller energy input causes shorter diffusion length of the reactant atoms. For example, although not a metal oxide, CdS quantum dots were synthesised via a mechanochemical reaction CdCl2 + Na2S → CdS + 2NaCl55. Milling was performed with a shaker mill for 1 h using a ball-to-powder mass ratio of 10:1 and steel balls of 4.8, 6.4, 9.5 and 12.6 mm in diameter. As the ball size was reduced from 12.6 to 4.8 mm, the average size of the resulting CdS quantum dots decreased from 8.2 to 4.3 nm. Since the particle sizes were below the exciton Bohr diameter of CdS, the bandgap energy of CdS increased through the quantum-confinement effect, as the ball size decreased.

Addition of a diluent in the starting powder mixture

The addition of an inert diluent serves two critical purposes to obtain nanoparticles with a low degree of agglomeration. Firstly, it suppresses combustion events during milling67. As discussed earlier, combustion causes temperature increase that results in large primary and secondary particles. If the diluent phase is inert and does not react with reactants, the diluent phase separates reactants from each other, thus influences the reaction kinetics by decreasing the collision frequency between the reactants during milling and reducing the effective reaction areas. In addition, the diluent phase acts as a heat sink to moderate any increase in the local temperatures associated with the reaction enthalpy67. The diluent also absorbs the mechanical energy. As a result, the addition of a diluent is effective in preventing combustion events during milling69,70. For example, when dry powders of CeCl3 and NaOH were milled together to produce CeO2 via the reaction CeCl3 + 3NaOH → CeO2 + 3NaCl + 1.5H2O under a high-purity argon gas atmosphere, a combustion event occurred within 2 min of milling and large aggregates of CeO2 (~500 nm in diameter) were obtained. In contrast, the addition of 12 moles of NaCl diluent to make up the starting powder mixture of CeCl3 + 3NaOH + 12NaCl prevented combustion from occurring and resulted in CeO2 nanoparticles of ~10 nm in diameter with a low degree of agglomeration70. However, the suppression of reaction kinetics leads to a longer milling time to complete the reaction51.

The second purpose of the addition of an inert diluent is to decrease the volume fraction of nanoparticles in the product phase. When the volume fraction of particles in the product phase is larger than 20%, the particles are no longer separated from each other by the by-product matrix, resulting in the formation of large aggregates71. By contrast, when the volume fraction of nanoparticles is < 20%, the particles tend to have little agglomeration56.

The volume fraction of the nanoparticles in the product phase also influence the size of nanoparticles. A smaller volume fraction results in smaller particle sizes55,71. For example, during mechanochemical synthesis of SnO2 nanoparticles via the reaction SnCl2 + Ca(OH)2 + 0.5O2(g) → SnO2 + CaCl2 + H2O(g), 29% of SnO2 volume fraction led to the formation of 1-μm sized aggregates, whereas 9% of volume fraction resulted in separated nanoparticles of ~30 nm in diameter71. Since smaller reactant particles lead to smaller product particles51, the size reduction of nanoparticles by increasing the volume fraction of NaCl may be attributed to the reduction of reactant particles during milling. In addition, the degree of crystallite growth decreases with increased levels of diluent, because the heat-sink effect of the diluent phase lowers the local adiabatic reaction temperature, leading to shorter diffusion lengths of reactant ions72.

Recently, NaCl was shown to play an active role, instead of being an inert diluent, in the mechanochemical processing of metal-oxide nanostructures. Shu et al.73 suggested that metal-chloride stating reactants can mechanochemically form a solid solution with NaCl through the so-called iron-sharing ability of NaCl, which leads to the improvement of oxide microstructure and the preparation of porous materials. This implies that NaCl should not be blindly regarded as an inert diluent. The possibility of NaCl to form a solid solution with metal-halide precursors and its influence on the reaction pathways and the characteristics of resulting nanoparticles need to be elucidated in future studies.

Mechanochemical synthesis of metal-oxide nanoparticles

Binary metal oxides

For the successful mechanochemical synthesis of metal-oxide nanoparticles, it is critical to carefully select suitable chemical reactions. The choice of raw materials influences the solubility of the by-product phase and the particle-matrix volume ratio. As the source of metal ions in metal-oxide nanopowder, metal salts such as chlorides are frequently used because of their readily available nature. Alkali-earth oxides are considered as an adequate counter- reactant to metal chlorides because they transform into water-soluble alkali-earth chlorides upon reaction with metal chlorides, whereby enabling easy, safe and green removal of the by-product phase. However, alkali-earth oxides such as CaO are often found non-reactive during ball milling, even when the Gibbs free energy change of the reaction is largely negative.

For example, ball milling of ZrCl4 and CaO dry powders does not result in the induction of mechanochemical reaction ZrCl4 + 2CaO → ZrO2 + 2CaCl2 (dG = −440 kJ), thus requiring a post-milling heat treatment at 300 °C for 1 h to complete the reaction74. Subsequent removal of CaCl2 yielded c-ZrO2 nanoparticles of ~10 nm in diameter with a low degree of agglomeration. Interestingly, the use of MgO instead of CaO resulted in the induction of the reaction ZrCl4 + 2MgO → ZrO2 + 2MgCl2 (dG = −198 kJ) during ball milling56. The difference between CaO and MgO may be attributable to the milling characteristics of by-products; MgCl2 is more brittle and mills into fine powders easier than CaCl2 hence affecting the reaction kinetics.

Although careful handling is required due to their hygroscopic and caustic nature, alkali-metal oxides can also be used as the counter-reactants to metal salts. For example, García-Pacheco et al.75 produced CoO and Co3O4 nanoparticles using a solid-state dry reaction CoCO3 + Na2O → CoO + Na2CO3 (dG = −250 kJ) in a shaker mill under an inert-gas atmosphere. Co3O4 was obtained by the post-milling oxidation of CoO. The resulting nanoparticles were soft agglomerates with primary particle sizes between 15 and 20 nm. However, the ball milling of ZrCl4 and Li2O did not result in the induction of a chemical reaction ZrCl4 + 2Li2O → ZrO2 + 4LiCl, despite the large Gibbs free energy change (−561 kJ), thus a post-milling heat treatment was required to produce ZrO2 nanoparticles of ~40 nm in diameter76.

Another approach to synthesise metal-oxide nanoparticles is to produce a precursor of metal oxides in a form of nanoparticles via mechanochemical processing followed by the thermal decomposition of the precursor nanoparticles into metal oxides by heat treatment at a moderate temperature while the precursor particles are embedded in the solid by-product matrix to avoid particle agglomeration. Examples of potential precursors include metal hydroxides, carbonates, acetate, oxalate, nitrates and sulphates, though nitrates and sulphates are not preferred because their decomposition generates toxic gases.

This approach has two advantages over the use of alkali-earth oxide reactants. The first advantage is that the counter-reactants to form the precursor metal salts, for example, Ca(OH)2 to form a metal-hydroxide precursor, are generally more reactive than alkali-earth oxides, which increases the chance for the reaction to complete during ball milling without post heat treatment. The second advantage is that the transition of mechanochemically synthesised precursors into metal oxides accompanies volume reduction, allowing the resulting metal-oxide nanoparticles to become smaller than the precursor nanoparticles. However, the second advantage is normally ineffective, as the heat treatment itself causes particle growth70.

For example, the production of Fe2O3 nanoparticles by mechanochemical milling was attempted via the reaction 2FeCl3 + 3CaO → Fe2O3 + 3CaCl2 (dG = −508 kJ) in a shaker mill, but the reaction did not occur during milling for 24 h77. In contrast, the milling of FeCl3 and Ca(OH)2 for 24 h resulted in the formation of FeOOH in an amorphous CaCl2 matrix, despite the lower Gibbs free energy change (−334 kJ) of the reaction 2FeCl3 + 3Ca(OH)2 → FeOOH + 3CaCl2 + 2H2O77. This is attributable to the better milling ability of Ca(OH)2 than CaO and demonstrates the importance of kinetic factors on the occurrence of mechanochemical reactions. The FeOOH phase was subsequently converted to Fe2O3 upon heat treatment at 200 °C. The removal of CaCl2 resulted in Fe2O3 nanoparticles of ~100 nm in diameter. The use of NaOH was also effective in completing the chemical reaction during milling to obtain Fe2O3 from FeCl378. Other oxide nanoparticles including CeO2 (10 nm)70, Fe3O4 (10 nm)79,80, and ZrO2 (~10 nm)81,82 were formed in a similar manner using hydroxide counter-reactants. However, the use of alkali-metal hydroxide or alkali-earth hydroxide counter-reactants can lead to the caking of milled powder and in turn repress the reaction kinetics to impede the completion of the reaction during milling, if the metal-hydroxide reaction-product decomposes into a metal oxide during milling to release water83.

Alkali-metal carbonate such as Na2CO3 can also work as a counter-reactant for metal-chloride raw materials to form water-soluble NaCl by-product. Na2CO3 has advantages over NaOH and Ca(OH)2 counter-reactants in the following aspects; (i) Na2CO3 is easier to handle than NaOH because it is less hygroscopic and corrosive than NaOH, (ii) Na2CO3 is softer than Ca(OH)2 thus easier to form a reactant nanocomposite during milling whereby reducing the milling time to complete the reaction, (iii) reaction products are metal carbonates which have moderate decomposition temperatures.

Na2CO3 was used for the first time in 1999 as a counter-reactant for metal-chloride raw materials to produce metal-oxide nanoparticles71. Since then, the use of alkali-metal carbonate counter-reactants has been successfully applied to produce a number of metal-oxide nanoparticles. For example, Fe2O3 nanoparticles were produced by mechanochemical processing via the reaction Fe2(SO4)3 + 3Na2CO3 → Fe2(CO3)3 + 3Na2SO4 and subsequent thermal decomposition84. The mixture of starting reactants Fe2(SO4)3, Na2CO3 and NaCl in a molar ratio of 1:3:4.3, was milled with a shaker-type mill. The NaCl diluent phase was added to decrease the volume fraction of Fe2O3 in the heat-treated powder down to 10%. The reaction was completed after milling for 4 h. After heat treatment at 400 °C for 1 hour and subsequent washing with water, Fe2O3 nanoparticles of ~6 nm in diameter was obtained. The particle-size distribution measured using electron micrographs was significantly narrow, with a standard deviation of only 3.3 nm. The result is in contrast with the use of FeCl3 and Ca(OH)2 where a longer milling time and the resulting Fe2O3 nanoparticles were polycrystalline and larger77.

The use of alkali-metal carbonate counter-reactants and an inert diluent has met success in producing other single-crystalline metal-oxide nanoparticles with a very small degree of agglomeration and narrow size distribution, including ZnO (~30 nm)71, SnO2 (5–30 nm)71, NiO (10 nm)85 and CdO (31 nm)86.

Most of the solid-state displacement reactions used in the mechanochemical synthesis of metal-oxide nanoparticles are associated with acid-base reactions. However, redox reactions can be also utilised (Table 1). For example, an attempt was made to mechanochemically react sodium dichromate and sulphur in a ball mill via the displacement reaction Na2Cr2O7 + S → Cr2O3 + Na2SO4 (dG = −521 kJ)69. Here, the starting material was not a metal salt but a tertiary metal oxide. The counter-reactant, S, selectively reduced Cr6+ into Cr3+ while being oxidised to S6+ to form a water-soluble sulphate by-product. After milling a stoichiometric mixture of the starting powders in a shaker mill for 10 min, an abrupt increase in the temperature of the milling vessel was observed69. In order to prevent the combustion event from occurring during milling, an inert diluent phase was added to the starting powder mixture. During the milling of a powder mixture Na2Cr2O7 + S + 7.8NaCl, the reaction progressed in a steady manner for 6 h and amorphous Cr2O3 particles with sizes around 4 nm were obtained69.

Table 1 Metal-oxide nanoparticles produced via mechanochemically induced redox reactions.

Doped binary metal oxides

Many metal oxides are semiconductors and their optical and electrical properties can be tailored by impurity doping. Mechanochemical processing allows impurity doping of metal-oxide nanoparticles by adding a source of dopants in the starting powder mixture.

For example, ZnO nanoparticles doped with Mn or Co were synthesised by the mechanochemical activation of the reaction (1-x)ZnCl2 + xMCl2 + Na2CO3 + 4NaCl → Zn1-xMxCO3 + 6NaCl and subsequent heat treatment to decompose the resulting carbonate precursors into oxides, where M is the dopant element87. The concentration of dopants can be tailored by adjusting the molar fraction of the reactant materials in the starting powder mixture. It was found that the doping level can be continuously modified below 4 at% for Co-doping and 2 at% for Mn-doping88. However, the actual doping level measured in the nanoparticles was different from the nominal doping level in the starting powder mixture. The doping of Mn and Co reduced the photocatalytic activities of ZnO nanoparticles87,88. Other doped metal-oxide nanoparticles have been produced in a similar manner, as listed in Table 2. Since mechanochemical processing can lead to a state of high enthalpy, one can expect that the maximum doping level that mechanochemical processing can achieve may be higher than the other doping methods such as sol–gel techniques. However, no systematic investigation on the doping limit in mechanochemical processing has been reported to date.

Table 2 Doped metal-oxide nanoparticles produced using the mechanochemical activation of solid-state displacement reactions.

Tertiary and other complex (high-entropy) metal oxides

Mechanochemical processing can be utilised to produce complex metal oxides such as tertiary oxides. The elemental composition can be controlled simply by the molar ratio of the reactant materials in the starting powder mixture. For example, Gagrani et al. produced Ca2Mn3O8, CaMn2O4 and CaMnO3 ultrafine particles by mechanochemical processing89. Ca2Mn3O8 nanoparticles were synthesised via ball milling of 2CaCl2 + 3MnCl2 + 5K2CO3 + 29KCl → Ca2Mn3(CO3)5 + 39KCl for 4 h and subsequent thermal decomposition of Ca2Mn3(CO3)5 into Ca2Mn3O8. The as-milled powder consisted of Ca2Mn3(CO3)5 nanoparticles of 10–20 nm in diameter. After heat treatment of the as-milled powder at 600 °C for 1 h, Ca2Mn3O8 nanoparticles had diameters in the range of 30–100 nm. CaMn2O4 and CaMnO3 nanoparticles were obtained in a similar manner, but using K2SO4 by-product phase instead of KCl90. This is because K2SO4 has a higher melting point (1069 °C) than KCl (770 °C) and the thermal decomposition of CaMn2(CO3)3 and CaMn(CO3)2 required heat treatment at higher than 770 °C. The mechanochemical reactions used were CaSO4 + 2MnSO4 + 3K2CO3 + 11K2SO4 → CaMn2(CO3)3 + 14K2SO4, and CaSO4 + MnSO4 + 2K2CO3 + 7K2SO4 → CaMn2(CO3)3 + 9K2SO4. In both cases, the amounts of extra K2SO4 added to the starting powder were such that the carbonates in the product phase had a volume fraction of 0.1. After milling for 4 h and subsequent heat treatment at 800 °C for 3 h, and 950 °C for 1 h, CaMnO3 (50–200 nm) and CaMn2O4 (200 nm–2 μm) were obtained, respectively.

Other tertiary metal-oxide ultrafine powders produced using the mechanochemical activation of solid-state displacement reactions are listed in Table 3.

Table 3 Tertiary metal-oxide nanoparticles produced using the mechanochemical activation of solid-state displacement reactions.

Nie et al.91 produced complex metal-oxide nanoparticles of 50–250 nm using mechanochemical processing. Metal acetate precursors and aluminium isopropoxide were milled together and subsequently heat-treated at 600 or 700 °C to form the so-called high-entropy metal-oxide nanoparticles consisting of more than five metal elements. It was found that the high-entropy nature imparts remarkable stability on particles, whose crystal structure and porosity can tolerate boiling water and high-temperature moisture.

Another approach to producing tertiary and high-enthalpy metal oxides by mechanochemical processing is mechanical alloying of binary metal oxides, metal carbonates or metal hydroxides. However, the approach does not utilise solid-state displacement reactions and thus is outside the scope of this review article.

Size control

The control of particle size by varying milling-ball sizes and powder-to-matrix volume ratio has been described earlier in this review. The choice of reaction paths and reactants also influences the size of nanoparticles but the result is not predictable. Extending milling time beyond the reaction completion is another way to increase particle sizes through welding and aggregating the particles within a solid matrix. However, prolonged milling time will increase the defects in nanoparticles and, in an extreme case, transform the nanoparticles into amorphous. A more sensible option to increase particle size while retaining the low degree of agglomeration is to heat treat the as-milled powder. The solid matrix phase in the as-milled powder separates nanoparticles as long as the temperature is lower than the melting point of the matrix material. For example, the average size of CeO2 nanoparticles was tailored between 10 nm and 50 nm, by controlling post-milling heat-treatment temperature below the melting point of NaCl reaction by-product (Fig. 3)70. The proximity between particle sizes estimated using X-ray diffraction (XRD, crystallite size), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area, and laser-light scattering (LLS, hydrodynamic diameter) has been demonstrated to be a good indicator to confirm that the low degree of agglomerations was retained during the size control70.

Fig. 3: Particle sizes of mechanochemically synthesised CeO2 nanoparticles as a function of post-milling heat treatment temperature70.
figure3

(Δ) Crystallite size estimated from the full-width at half maximum of X-ray diffraction (XRD) peaks, (⎕) particle size estimated from the Brunauer-–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area, and () particle size measured using a laser-light scattering (LLS) method. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons.

The mechanisms of particle-size control in solid matrices have not been elucidated. Theoretically, the solid barrier between nanoparticles should prevent nanoparticles from moving around to come into contact with each other, thus no particle growth should be expected. However, it was observed that a particle-growth behaviour mimics the Ostwald ripening during post-milling heat treatment70. It is speculated that the grain growth of the crystalline solid matrix plays a critical role in the size increase of nanoparticles during heat treatment. The increase in the size and crystallinity of the matrix’s crystal grains may coagulate nanoparticles, in a manner similar to ice crystals expelling gas molecules from their crystal lattice and gathering the gas molecules to certain locations when water freezes. However, direct evidence of this effect on nanoparticle growth in a solid matrix has not been documented.

Shape control

The shape of nanoparticles is important to some of their properties. For example, the exposure of selected crystal facets increases or decreases the catalytic activities of nanoparticles, because the surface energy depends on the crystal facets92. It was demonstrated that the shape of mechanochemically produced metal-oxide nanoparticles can be controlled to a certain degree. The operation involves heat treatment of as-milled powders at elevated temperatures while nanoparticles are still embedded in a by-product or diluent phase.

Well-disperse α-Fe2O3 (haematite) nanoparticles with a plate-shape were produced from the γ-Fe2O3 (~6 nm) that were mechanochemically synthesised via the reaction Fe2(SO4)3 + 3Na2CO3 + 4.3NaCl → γ-Fe2O3 + 3Na2SO4 + 4.3NaCl + 3CO293. Prior to removing Na2SO4 and NaCl, the γ-Fe2O3 nanopowder was heat-treated at 700oC in the air for 1 h. The resulting α-Fe2O3 consisted of only hexagonal platelets having diameters of 50–200 nm and thicknesses of about 20–40 nm, with a low degree of agglomeration (Fig. 4a). The heat treatment temperature of 700 °C was above the eutectic melting temperature of Na2SO4 and NaCl mixture (~620 °C) and the molten salts may have acted as a flux to form the platey shapes of haematite94. Nevertheless, this new synthesis route of Fe2O3 platelets can produce much smaller particles than conventional molten-salt techniques and did not require the addition of any mineralizers that are normally necessary to form ceramic nanoparticles with unique shapes94.

Fig. 4: Examples of morphology-controlled nanoparticles produced by mechanochemical processing.
figure4

a Transmission electron micrograph of α-Fe2O3 plate-shaped nanoparticles93. b Scanning electron micrograph of MnO2 nanorods96. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.

BaFe12O19 magnetic nano-platelets were produced in a similar manner:95 Ball milling of 1.2BaCl2 + 12FeCl3 + 38.4NaOH + 200 wt% NaCl induced a chemical reaction to form metal hydroxides and NaCl. The as-milled powder was heat-treated at ~800 °C, at the melting point of NaCl, in the air for 1 h, resulting in BaFe12O19 platelet nanoparticles with diameters of 20–100 nm and thicknesses of 10–20 nm.

The shape control of MnO2 nanoparticles was achieved at a temperature much lower than the melting point of a slat matrix phase96. In the study, MnO2 was produced via the mechanochemical reaction 2KMnO4 + MnCl2 → 3MnO2 + 2KCl + O2 with the addition of KCl diluent, and the as-milled powder was heated at 350 °C for 1 h to obtain single-crystalline nanorods of 15–20 nm in diameter and 100–400 nm in length (Fig. 4b). This temperature is significantly lower than the melting temperature of NaCl (801 °C). As such, the morphology-transformation cannot be explained using existing knowledge such as the molten-salt crystal-growth mechanism97.

Interestingly, similar processes do not always lead to shaped nanoparticles. For example, CeO2 nanoparticles of ~10 nm in diameter were produced in a NaCl matrix via a mechanochemical reaction CeCl3 + 3NaOH + 12NaCl → Ce(OH)3 + 15NaCl and the effect of heat treatment temperature on the particle size of CeO2 was studied70. The heat treatment produced only near-spherical particles, regardless of the temperature being below or above the melting point of NaCl. The mechanisms of the particle-shape control in post-milling heat treatment have not been fully understood.

Soft mechanochemistry

Soft mechanochemical reactions involve highly reactive raw materials, often represented by hydrate or hydroxide materials98. A comprehensive review of this synthesis approach is given by Avvakumov et al.99 and the theoretical explanation of the process was made from the viewpoint of hydrothermal reactions by Boldyrev100. Some consider the use of hydroxide counter-reactants such as NaOH as an example of soft-mechanochemical processing. Hydrate or hydroxide materials tend to be softer than anhydrous or oxide forms of materials, which benefits the mechanochemical induction of chemical reactions and, in turn, assists in the production of nanoscale materials101. It is believed that soft mechanochemistry plays an important role in biological processes in nature102.

A variety of soft-mechanochemical displacement reactions were used to produce many binary, tertiary and doped metal oxides (Table 4). Generally, the use of hydrous metal salts enables shorter milling times (< 1 h) to complete the reaction than anhydrous raw materials. In addition, hydrate materials tend to be less expensive than anhydrous materials and more readily available. Hence soft-mechanochemical processing may be more beneficial than conventional mechanochemical processing in terms of reduced environmental footprint24.

Table 4 Examples of metal-oxide nanoparticles produced by soft-mechanochemical processing (not a comprehensive list).

Conclusions and outlook

In the last three decades, the development of mechanochemical processing to synthesise metal-oxide nanoparticles have made significant progress. The versatile nature of mechanochemical processing was demonstrated for its ability to produce a variety of metal-oxide nanoparticles including doped oxides and complex oxide, as well as the ability to produce single-crystalline nanoparticles with little agglomeration in a manner the particle size and shapes are controlled. In particular, mechanochemistry offers positive aspects of green chemistry, which has started to attract wide recognition in recent years. Although mechanochemistry has become a research field of its own, mechanochemical processing of metal-oxide nanoparticles has not yet reached its maturity. This article reviewed the progress of the research field of the mechanochemical synthesis of metal-oxide nanoparticles, by addressing the critical influencing factors such as the choice of reaction pathways and selection of reactants, whereby providing new insights into existing research gaps that could serve as a guideline for future research necessary to take the technology further.

For example, the effects of process parameters require further investigation. The combination of ball-to-powder ratio and milling time can influence the frequency of reactant-ball collision events and thus affect the time to complete the reaction. However, the influence of the combination on the nanoparticle end products has not been documented. Also, the influence of mill types on the kinetics of mechanochemical synthesis of metal-oxide nanoparticles has not been understood. Shaker mills mostly give impact-type force to the reactant powders whilst shear force is dominated in planetary mills and attrition mills. The deformation, fracture and welding of reactant crystals may occur in different ways under different types of forces, as demonstrated in the mechanochemical co-crystallisation of organic compounds16. The study on the topic will shed more light on the mechanisms of mechanochemical synthesis of metal-oxide nanoparticles.

In addition, the mechanisms of the particle-shape control in post-milling heat treatment are not fully understood. It is speculated that the salt matrix may influence the surface energy of certain crystal facets of metal oxides to assist the shaping of particles103. The ability to shape nanoparticles may depend on not only temperature but also the interaction between the ions in the salt matrix and metal-oxide surface and also impurity migration into the crystals. Further study on these points is required to elucidate the mechanisms of nanoparticle shaping within a salt matrix. This will expand the ability of mechanochemical processing to produce nanoparticles with a variety of shapes including belt, cube, disk, hollow-shell and Janus structures.

The assumption that NaCl behaves as an inert diluent phase in many mechanochemical reactions, may require re-examination. The study of Shu et al.73 indicated that metal-chloride stating reactants can mechanochemically form a solid solution. It should be investigated whether the reaction pathways may involve the formation of solid solutions between a diluent phase and metal-halide raw materials before the solid solution reacts with the counter-reactant to form metal-oxide nanoparticles. Most of the past studies on the mechanochemical formation of solid solutions are limited to metal alloys (with metallic bonds) or metal oxides (with covalent bonds being dominant). If the mechanochemical formation of solid solutions of ionic crystals can be widely demonstrated using many types of ionic crystals, that may open up a new avenue for mechanochemistry to expand its applications in the synthesis of new materials.

Although soft-mechanochemical processing has some advantages over non-soft-mechanochemical processing, the methods to control size, shape and degree of agglomeration using soft mechanochemical processing are under-developed compared to non-soft-mechanochemical processing. The approaches taken for non-soft-mechanochemical processing described in this review may be useful in this aspect. In addition, many studies of soft-mechanochemical synthesis require re-visiting by taking into account the following precautions: (i) many hydrous metal salts are highly hygroscopic and thus, if the milling chamber is not sealed, the effects of atmospheric humidity on the reaction kinetics is difficult to determine; (ii) hydrous metal salts are mostly soluble so that the occurrence of mechanochemical process should be confirmed during milling or before washing the as-milled powder; (iii) the milling of hydrous metal salts tends to become amorphous so that the completion of the reaction before heat treatment or by-product removal is difficult to assess using XRD; (iv) hydrous metal salts may release water during milling83 and cake the milled powder within the milling container, reducing the milling efficiency or altering the reaction path (e.g. liquid-assisted grinding104); (v) the method normally results in the production of precursors that require thermal decomposition to form metal oxides and the heat treatment may agglomerate nanoparticles in the absence of an appropriate quantity of an inert matrix phase; (iv) the involvement of water and corrosive raw materials may introduce impurities arising from the corrosion of milling container and balls.

Furthermore, the analysis of environmental impacts in mechanochemical processing should be conducted to confirm its claim for green chemistry. The analysis may be difficult, as many different conditions are used in mechanochemical processing and the number of synthesis conditions is rapidly increasing. Nonetheless, the determination of reaction path, mill type and energy input should enable one to perform reasonable life-cycle analysis. This would assist in manifesting the potential of mechanochemistry in the sustainable green production of metal-oxide nanoparticles.

References

  1. 1.

    Tsuzuki, T. Commercial scale production of inorganic nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanotechnol. 6, 567–578 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chaichanawong, J. et al. Formation of strontium-doped lanthanum manganite (La0.8Sr0.2MnO3) by mechanical milling without media balls. Adv. Powder Technol. 17, 613–622 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zhang, Q. & Saito, F. Mechanochemical synthesis of LaMnO3 from La2O3 and Mn2O3 powders. J. Alloy. Compd. 297, 99–103 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Michalchuk, A. A. L., Boldyreva, E. V., Belenguer, A. M., Emmerling, F. & Boldyrev, V. V. Tribochemistry, mechanical alloying, mechanochemistry: what is in a name? Front. Chem. 9, 685789 (2021). The article addresses the standardization of technical terms in mechanochemistry and proposes a new guideline for the reporting of experimental conditions of mechanochemical reactions.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Boldyrev, V. V. & Tkáčová, K. Mechanochemistry of solids: past, present, and prospects. J. Mater. Synth. Process. 8, 121–132 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Baláž, P. Mechanochemistry in Nanoscience and Minerals Engineering. (Springer-Verlag, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Takacs, L. M. Carey Lea, the father of mechanochemistry. Bull. Hist. Chem. 28, 26–34 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wieczorek-Ciurowa, K. & Gamrat, K. Mechanochemical syntheses as an example of green processes. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 88, 213–217 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    James, S. L. et al. Mechanochemistry: opportunities for new and cleaner synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 413–447 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ardila-Fierro, K. J. & Hernández, J. G. Sustainability assessment of mechanochemistry by using the twelve principles of green chemistry. ChemSusChem 14, 2145–2162 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Colacino, E., Isoni, V., Crawford, D. & García, F. Upscaling mechanochemistry: challenges and opportunities for sustainable industry. Trend Chem. 3, 335–339 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gomollón-Bel, F. Ten chemical innovations that will change our world: IUPAC identifies emerging technologies in chemistry with potential to make our planet more sustainable. Chem. Int. 41, 12–17 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    McCormick, P. G. & Froes, F. H. The fundamentals of mechanochemical processing. J. Miner., Met. Mater. Soc. 50, 61–65 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tkáčová, K., Heegn, H. & Števulová, N. Energy transfer and conversion during comminution and mechanical activation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 40, 17–31 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Boldyrev, V. V. Mechanochemistry and mechanical activation of solids. Russian Chem. Rev. 75, 177–189 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tumanov, I. A., Achkasov, A. F., Boldyreva, E. V. & Boldyrev, V. V. Following the products of mechanochemical synthesis step by step. CrystEngComm 13, 2213–2216 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Friščić, T. et al. Real-time and in situ monitoring of mechanochemical milling reactions. Nat. Chem. 5, 66 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Michalchuk, A. A. L., Kabelitz, A. & Emmerling, F. in Nontraditional Activation Methods in Green and Sustainable Applications (eds Béla, T. & Christian, S.) Ch. 11, 369–419 (Elsevier, 2021).

  19. 19.

    Traversari, G., Porcheddu, A., Pia, G., Delogu, F. & Cincottia, A. Coupling of mechanical deformation and reaction in mechanochemical transformations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 229–245 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gil-González, E., Rodríguez-Laguna, Md. R., Sánchez-Jiménez, P. E., Perejón, A. & Pérez-Maquedaa, L. A. Unveiling mechanochemistry: kinematic-kinetic approach for the prediction of mechanically induced reactions. J. Alloy. Compd. 866, 158925 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mateti, S. et al. Mechanochemistry: a force in disguise and conditional effects towards chemical reactions. Chem. Commun. 57, 1080–1092 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Beyer, M. K. & Clausen-Schaumann, H. Mechanochemistry: the mechanical activation of covalent bonds. Chem. Rev. 105, 2921–2948 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Baláž, P. et al. Hallmarks of mechanochemistry: from nanoparticles to technology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 7571–7637 (2013). The article provides a comprehensive overview of the development of mechanochemistry including its history, reaction mechanisms, a variety of reaction products, and industrial applications.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Senna, M. Smart mechanochemistry—charge transfer control for tailored solid-state reaction under minimum external energy. J. Alloy. Compd. 434-435, 768–772 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sopicka-Lizer, M. High-Energy Ball Milling (Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2010).

  26. 26.

    Šepelák, V., Düvel, A., Wilkening, M., Becker, K.-D. & Heitjans, P. Mechanochemical reactions and syntheses of oxides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 7507–7520 (2013). The article reviews the mechanosynthesis of wide-ranging oxide materials of various structures.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ivanov, E. & Suryanarayana, C. Materials and process design through mechanochemical routes. J. Mater. Synth. Process. 8, 235–244 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zdujic, M. in Finely Dispersed Particles (eds Aleksandar, M. S. & Jyh-Ping, H.) Ch. 17 (CRC Press, 2005).

  29. 29.

    Boldyreva, E. Mechanochemistry of inorganic and organic systems: what is similar, what is different? Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 7719–7738 (2013). The article gives in-depth discussion about the reaction mechanisms of mechanochemical processing.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Amrute, A. P., Bellis, J. D., Felderhoff, M. & Schüth, F. Mechanochemical synthesis of catalytic materials. Chem. A Eur. J. 27, 6819–6847 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jones, W. & Eddleston, M. D. Mechanochemistry, a versatile synthesis strategy for new materials. Faraday Discuss. 170, 9–34 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tan, D. & García, F. Main group mechanochemistry: from curiosity to established protocols. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 2274–2292 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Friščić, T., Mottillo, C. & Titi, H. M. Mechanochemistry for synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 1018–1029 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fiss, B. G. et al. Mechanochemical methods for the transfer of electrons and exchange of ions: inorganic reactivity from nanoparticles to organometallics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 8279–8318 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rightmire, N. R. & Hanusa, T. P. Advances in organometallic synthesis with mechanochemical methods. Dalton Trans. 45, 2352–2362 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Virieux, D., Delogu, F., Porcheddu, A., García, F. & Colacino, E. Mechanochemical rearrangements. J. Org. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01323 (2021).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ng, Z. X. et al. Direct and telescopic mechanochemical synthesis of higher-order organic-inorganic hybrid cocrystals: tuning order, functionality and size in cocrystal design. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 17481–17490 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Shakhtshneider, T. P., Myz, S. A., Boldyreva, E. V., Nizovskii, A. I. & Kumar, R. Core-shell mechanocomposites of drugs with inorganic oxides and hydroxides. Acta Phys. Polonica A 126, 1019–1024 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Matteazzi, P., Basset, D. & Miani, F. Mechanosynthesis of nanophase materials. Nanostructued Mater. 2, 217–229 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    De Castro, C. L. & Mitchell, B. S. in Synthesis, Functionalization and Surface Treatment of Nanoparticles (ed. Baraton, M. I.) Ch. 1 (American Scientific Publishers, 2003).

  41. 41.

    Stenger, F., Mende, S., Schwedes, J. & Peukert, W. The influence of suspension properties on the grinding behavior of alumina particles in the submicron size range in stirred media mills. Powder Technol. 156, 103–110 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Salari, M., Rezaee, M., Marashi, S. P. H. & Aboutalebi, S. H. The role of the diluent phase in the mechanochemical preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles. Powder Technol. 192, 54–57 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Salari, M., Rezaee, M., Marashi, S. P. H. & Aboutalebi, S. H. Effect of milling time on mechanochemical synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 22, 2955–2961 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Dodd, A. C. & McCormick, P. G. Synthesis of nanocrystalline yttrium oxide powders by mechanochemical processing. J. Metastable Nanocrystalline Mater. 20-21, 319–324 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Liu, X., Ding, J. & Wang, J. An α-Fe2O3 Powder of nanosized particles via precursor dispersion. J. Mater. Res. 14, 3355–3362 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Shi, Y., Ding, J. & Yin, H. CoFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared by the mechanochemical method. J. Alloy. Compd. 308, 290–295 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Shi, Y., Ding, J., Liu, X. & Wang, J. NiFe2O4 ultrafine particles prepared by co-precipitation/mechanical alloying. J. Magn. Magn. Mater.: Chem. Phys. 205, 249–254 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ding, J., Tsuzuki, T. & McCormick, P. G. Microstructural evolution of Ni-NaCl mixtures during mechanochemical reaction and mechanical milling. J. Mater. Sci. 34, 5293–5298 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Takacs, L. Self-sustaining reactions induced by ball milling. Prog. Mater. Sci. 47, 355–414 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Billik, P. & Čaplovičová, M. in Advances in Nanotechnology, Vol. 8 (eds Bartul, Z. & Trenor, J.) Ch. 2 (Nova Science, 2012).

  51. 51.

    Tsuzuki, T., Ding, J. & McCormick, P. G. Mechanochemical synthesis of ultrafine zinc sulfide particles. Phys. B 239, 378–387 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Urakaev, F. K. Scientific principles for preparation nanoscale particles by the exchange mechanochemical reactions (overview). Int. J. Computational Mater. Sci. Surf. Eng. 4, 347–373 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Urakaev, F. K. & Boldyrev, V. V. Theoretical estimation of conditions for the preparation of nanoscale systems in mechanochemical reactions. Russian J. Phys. Chem. 79, 563–572 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Urakaev, F. K. & Boldyrev, V. V. Mechanism and kinetics of mechanochemical processes in comminuting devices 1. Theory Powder Technol. 107, 93–107 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Tsuzuki, T. & McCormick, P. G. Mechanochemical synthesis of nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. 39, 5143–5146 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    McCormick, P. G., Tsuzuki, T., Robinson, J. S. & Ding, J. Nanopowders synthesized by mechanochemical processing. Adv. Mater. 13, 1008–1010 (2001). The article reviews the mechanochemical synthesis of a variety of free-standing nanoparticles with a low degree of agglomeration using solid-state displacement reactions.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Osterwalder, N., Capello, C., Hungerbühler, K. & Stark, W. J. Energy consumption during nanoparticle production: how economic is dry synthesis? J. Nanopart. Res. 8, 1–9 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Salieri, B., Turner, D. A., Nowack, B. & Hischier, R. Life cycle assessment of manufactured nanomaterials: where are we? Nanoimpact 10, 108–120 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Singh, V. K. et al. Multigram mechanochemical synthesis of a salophen complex: a comparative analysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9, 1152–1160 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Posudievsky, O. Y. et al. Facile mechanochemical preparation of nitrogen and fluorine co-doped graphene and its electrocatalytic performance. Carbon 152, 274–283 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Lahiri, I. & Balasubramanian, K. Application of mechanochemical synthesis for protective coating on steel grinding media prior to ball milling of copper. Bull. Mater. Sci. 30, 157–161 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Cho, S.-W. et al. Changes in the microstructure and hydrogen storage properties of Ti–Cr–V alloys by ball milling and heat treatment. J. Alloy. Compd. 509, 5545–5550 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Michalchuk, A. A. L., Tumanov, I. A. & Boldyreva, E. V. Ball size or ball mass—what matters in organic mechanochemical synthesis? CrystEngComm 21, 2174–2179 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Yang, H., Nguyen, G. & McCormick, P. G. Mechanochemical reduction of CuO by graphite. Scr. Metall. et. Materialia 32, 681–684 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Schaffer, G. B. & McCormick, P. G. Combustion synthesis by mechanical alloying. Scr. Metall. et. Materialia 23, 835–838 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Yang, H. & McCormick, P. G. Reduction of tantalum chloride by magnesium during reaction milling. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 12, 1088–1091 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ding, J., Tsuzuki, T., McCormick, P. G. & Street, R. Ultrafine Cu particles prepared by mechanochemical process. J. Alloy. Compd. 234, L1–L3 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Cho, H., Kwon, J., Kim, K. & Mun, M. Optimum choice of the make-up ball sizes for maximum throughput in tumbling ball mills. Powder Technol. 246, 625–634 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Tsuzuki, T. & McCormick, P. G. Synthesis of Cr2O3 nanoparticles by mechanochemical processing. Acta Materialia 48, 2795–2801 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Tsuzuki, T. & McCormick, P. G. Synthesis of ultrafine ceria powders by mechanochemical processing. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 1453–1458 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Tsuzuki, T. & McCormick, P. G. Synthesis of metal-oxide nanoparticles by mechanochemical processing. J. Metastable Nanocrystalline Mater. 8, 383–388 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Dodd, A. C. & McCormick, P. G. Factors affecting the particle size of powders synthesised by mechanochemical processing. J. Metastable Nanocyrstalline Mater. 15-16, 545–552 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Shu, Y. et al. A principle for highly active metal oxide catalysts via NaCl-based solid solution. Chem 6, 1723–1741 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Ding, J., Tsuzuki, T. & McCormick, P. G. Mechanochemical synthesis of ultrafine ZrO2 powder. Nanostruct. Mater. 8, 75–81 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    García-Pacheco, G., Cabañas-Moreno, J. G., Yee-Madeira, H. & Cruz-Gandarilla, F. Co3O4 nanoparticles produced by mechanochemical reactions. Nanotechnology 17, 2528–2535 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Dodd, A. C. & McCormick, P. G. Solid-state chemical synthesis of nanoparticulate zirconia. Acta Materialia 49, 4214–4220 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Ding, J., Tsuzuki, T. & McCormick, P. G. Hematite powders synthesized by mechanochemical processing. Nanostruct. Mater. 8, 739–747 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Kusigerski, V. et al. High coercivity of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles obtained by a mechanochemically activated solid-state displacement reaction. Scr. Materialia 56, 883–886 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Iwasaki, T., Mizutani, N., Watano, S., Yanagida, T. & Kawai, T. Size control of magnetite nanoparticles by organic solvent-free chemical coprecipitation at room temperature. J. Exp. Nanosci. 5, 251–262 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lin, C. R., Chu, Y. M. & Wang, S. C. Magnetic properties of magneite nanoparticles prepared by mechanochemical reaction. Mater. Lett. 60, 447–450 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Dodd, A. C., Tsuzuki, T. & McCormick, P. G. Nanocrystalline zirconia powders synthesised by mechanochemical processing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 301, 54–58 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Dodd, A. C. & McCormick, P. G. Synthesis of nanocrystalline ZrO2 powders by mechanochemical reaction of ZrCl4 with LiOH. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 22, 1823–1829 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Liao, J. & Senna, M. Mechanochemical dehydration and amorphization of hydroxides of Ca, Mg and Al on grinding with and without SiO2. Solid State Ion. 304, 313–319 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Tsuzuki, T., Schaffel, F., Muroi, M. & McCormick, P. G. Magnetic properties of mechanochemically synthesized γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. J. Alloy. Compd. 509, 5420–5425 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Dodd, A. C. A comparison of mechanochemical methods for the synthesis of nanoparticulate nickel oxide. Powder Technol. 196, 30–35 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Yang, H., Qiu, G., Zhang, X., Tang, A. & Yang, W. Preparation of CdO nanoparticles by mechanochemical reaction. J. Nanopart. Res. 6, 539–542 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Dodd, A., McKinley, A., Tsuzuki, T. & Saunders, M. Tailoring the photocatalytic activity of nanoparticulate zinc oxide by transition metal oxide doping. Mater. Chem. Phys. 114, 382–386 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    He, R., Hocking, R. E. & Tsuzuki, T. Local structure and photocatalytic property of mechanochemical synthesized ZnO doped with transition metal oxides. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 49, 76–81 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Gagrani, A., Sousa, S., Monteiro, O. C. & Tsuzuki, T. Solid state synthesis and photocatalytic activity of bio-inspired calcium manganese oxide catalysts. J. Solid State Chem. 288, 121390 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Gagrani, A., Alsultan, M., Swiegers, G. F. & Tsuzuki, T. Photo-electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction by biomimetic CaMn2O4 catalyst. Appl. Sci. 9, 2196 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Nie, S. et al. Entropy-driven chemistry reveals highly stabledenary MgAl2O4-type catalysts. Chem. Catal. 1, 1–15 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Yang, H. G. et al. Anatase TiO2 single crystals with a large percentage of reactive facets. Nature 453, 638–641 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Tsuzuki, T., Schaffel, F., Muroi, M. & McCormick, P. G. α-Fe2O3 nano-platelets prepared by mechanochemical/thermal processing. Powder Technol. 210, 198–202 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Lee, W. E., Jayaseelana, D. D. & Zhang, S. Solid-liquid interactions: the key to microstructural evolution in ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28, 1517–1525 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Ding, J., Tsuzuki, T. & McCormick, P. G. Ultrafine BaFe12O19 powder synthesised by mechanochemical processing. J. Magnetizm Magn. Mater. 177, 931–932 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Gagrani, A. & Tsuzuki, T. Solvent free mechanochemical synthesis of MnO2 for the efficient degradation of rhodamine-B. Ceram. Int. 44, 4694–4698 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Kimura, T. in Advances in Ceramics (ed. Sikalidis, C.) 75–100 (InTech, 2011).

  98. 98.

    Senna, M. Incipient chemical interaction between fine particles under mechanical stress—a feasibility of producing advanced materials via mechanochemical routes. Solid S. Ion. 63-65, 3–9 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Avvakumov, G. V., Senna, M. & Kosova, N. V. Soft Mechanochemical Synthesis (Springer, 2001). This book gives an comprehensive review of soft mechanochemistry as a novel approach to mechanocheical synthesis.

  100. 100.

    Boldyrev, V. V. Hydrothermal reactions under mechanochemical action. Powder Technol. 122, 247–254 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Ye, X. R., Jia, D. Z., Yu, J. Q., Xin, X. Q. & Xue, Z. One-step solid-state reactions at ambient temperatures— novel approach to nanocrystal synthesis. Adv. Mater. 11, 941–942 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Lavalle, P., Boulmedais, F., Schaaf, P. & Jierry, L. Soft-mechanochemistry: mechanochemistry inspired by nature. Langmuir 32, 7265–7276 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Sugita, N., Maekawa, M., Ohta, Y., Okinaka, K. & Nagai, N. Advances in fine magnetic particles for high density recording. IEEE Trans. Magn. 31, 2854–2858 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Tumanov, I. A., Michalchuk, A. A. L., Politov, A. A., Boldyreva, E. V. & Boldyrev, V. V. Inadvertent liquid assisted grinding: a key to “dry” organic mechano-co-crystallisation? CrystEngComm 19, 2830–2835 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Billik, P., Čaplovičová, M., Janata, J. & Fajnor, V. Š. Direct synthesis of nanocrystalline, spherical α-Mn2O3 particles by mechanochemical reduction. Mater. Lett. 62, 1052–1054 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Bao, J., Duan, X. & Zhang, P. Facile synthesis of a CuMnOx catalyst based on a mechanochemical redox process for efficient and stable CO oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 24438–24444 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Dodd, A. C. & McCormick, P. G. Synthesis and processing of ultrafine Mg-PSZ powder. J. Metastable Nanocrystalline Mater. 2-6, 221–228 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Sabri, N. S., Deni, M. S. M., Zakaria, A. & Kumar, M. Effect of Mn doping on structural and optical properties of SnO2 nanoparticles prepared by mechanochemical processing. Phys. Procedia 25, 233–239 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Talari, M. K., AbdulMajeed, A. B., Tripathi, D. K. & Thy, M. T. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial investigation of mechanochemically processed silver doped ZnO nanoparticles. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 60, 818–824 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Echresh, A. & Shoushtari, M. Z. Synthesis of Al-doping ZnO nanoparticles via mechanochemical method and investigation of their structural and optical properties. Mater. Lett. 109, 88–91 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Dodd, A., McKinley, A., Tsuzuki, T. & Saunders, M. Mechanochemical synthesis of nanoparticulate ZnO-ZnWO4 powders and their photocatalytic activity. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29, 139–144 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Todaka, Y., Nakamura, M., Hattori, S., Tsuchiya, K. & Umemoto, M. Synthesis of ferrite nanoparticles by mechanochemical processing using a ball mill. Mater. Trans. 44, 277–284 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Ito, T., Zhang, Q. & Saito, F. Synthesis of perovskite-type lanthanum cobalt oxide nanoparticles by means of mechanochemical treatment. Powder Technol. 143–144, 170–173 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Muroi, M., McCormick, P. G. & Street, R. Surface spin disorder and exchange bias in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 nanoparticles synthesised by mechanochemical processing. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 5, 76–81 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Li, F., Yu, X., Pan, H., Wang, M. & Xin, X. Syntheses of MO2 (M-Si, Ce, Sn) nanoparticles by solid-state reactions at ambient temperature. Solid State Sci. 2, 767–772 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Li, Y. X., Chen, W. F., Zhou, X. Z., Gu, Z. Y. & Chen, C. M. Synthesis of CeO2 nanoparticles by mechanochemical processing and the inhibiting action of NaCl on particle agglomeration. Mater. Lett. 59, 48–52 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Bedoya, P. A. C., Botta, P. M., Bercoff, P. G. & Fanovich, M. A. Magnetic iron oxides nanoparticles obtained by mechanochemical reactions from different solid precursors. J. Alloy. Compd. 860, 157892 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Javadhesari, S. M., Alipour, S., Mohammadnejad, S. & Akbarpour, M. R. Antibacterial activity of ultra-small copper oxide (II) nanoparticles synthesized by mechanochemical processing against S. aureus and E. coli. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 105, 110011 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Yang, H., Hu, Y., Zhang, X. & Qiu, G. Mechanochemical synthesis of cobalt oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 58, 387–389 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Yang, H., Tang, A., Zhang, X., Yang, W. & Qiu, G. In2O3 nanoparticles synthesized by mechanochemical processing. Scr. Materialia 50, 413–415 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Bėčytė, V., Mažeika, K., Rakickas, T. & Pakštas, V. Study of magnetic and structural properties of cobalt-manganeseferrite nanoparticles obtained by mechanochemical synthesis. Mater. Chem. Phys. 172, 6–10 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Dutta, R. K., Nenavathu, B. P. & Talukdar, S. Anomalous antibacterial activity and dye degradation by selenium doped ZnO nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 114, 218–224 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Ahmed, A. Z. et al. Fabrication and characterization of B/Sn-doped ZnO nanoparticles via mechanochemical method for photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 51, 1369–1378 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Tsuzuki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Communications Chemistry thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsuzuki, T. Mechanochemical synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles. Commun Chem 4, 143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-021-00582-3

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing