Introduction

Alkynes and carbonyl derivatives are among the most important functional groups since they are ubiquitous in organic compounds as well as they serve as useful chemical handles transformed to other diverse functional groups1,2,3,4. The introduction of alkyne onto a specific remote position to carbonyl groups is of interest to organic chemists5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. In particular, the alkynylation at ɤ-positon of carbonyl functional group is challenging. Yu and Chatani reported a coordination-assisted strategy for alkynylation of amides via Pd/Rh catalyzed C–H activation (Fig. 1a)15,16. This strategy gave only two examples for ɤ-alkynylation with poor results (<40% yield) and is only applicable to the terminal methyl group of amide with directing group. Recently, Zhu and Studer independently developed an elegant alkynyl migration of propargyl alcohol with a pendant olefin via a radical initiated chain reaction to give ɤ-alkynylated ketones (Fig. 1b)17,18,19. Despite significant progress in this field20, the existing methods suffer from several major limitations and drawbacks: (1) Requiring additional steps to synthesize the backbone of sophisticated substrates. (2) Restricted to specific carbonyl functional groups (amide or ketone). (3) Limited substitution patterns at ɤ-position (R=H, or CnFmCH2). Thus, a general, practical, and straightforward method to introduce ɤ-alkynylation for diverse carbonyl derivatives, including ketones, esters, and amides, from easily available and cost-effective starting materials is highly desirable. On the other hand, intermolecular carbo-difunctionalization of alkenes is unarguably an attractive alternative to build molecular complexity via simultaneous formation of two C–C bonds by backbone assembly 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Synthesis of ɤ-alkynylated carbonyl derivatives. a Coordination-assisted strategy for alkynylation of amides via Pd/Rh catalyzed C–H activation. b Alkynyl migration of propargyl alcohols with a pendant olefin by radical initiated chain reaction. c This work

Herein, we establish a unified and general protocol for the direct synthesis of ɤ-alkynylated aryl or alkyl ketones, aldehydes, esters, acids, secondary and tertiary amides using α-bromomethyl carbonyl precursors with alkynes in the presence of alkenes at room temperature (Fig. 1c). Over the past years, reports disclosed that α-halomethyl carbonyl compounds could be converted into alkyl radicals (A)36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46 to initiate coupling with unsaturated systems, such as alkenes and alkynes, to produce C-centered radical (B) (Fig. 1c). We hypothesize that the direct utilization of the radical intermediate (B) with copper catalysis47,48,49,50,51 by the merger of photocatalysis52,53,54,55,56,57 to give desired ɤ-alkynylated carbonyl compounds. However, several highly competitive reactions have to be suppressed. First, radical B is facile to undergo atom transfer39,40,41,42 or single electron oxidation43,44,45,46 by transition metal or photocatalyst (k = 105−109 M−1 s−1)58,59. Moreover, A would directly undergo metal-catalyzed (Pd, Cu) cross-coupling to give α-alkynylated carbonyl derivatives C in the presence of alkyne 60,61.

Results

Reaction conditions evaluation

With these concerns in mind, we set out to explore the possibility of direct incorporating radical intermediate B into copper-catalyzed Csp3–sp bond-forming to furnish ɤ-alkynylated carbonyl derivatives using ethyl α-bromoacetate 1a, styrene 2a, and trimethylsilylacetylene. After some initial trials, we found the use of alkynyl silicate 3a significantly improve the radical cascade coupling efficiency. Upon intensive examining a wide range of reaction parameters, we determined that CuI (10 mol%), a tridendate ligand L1 (10 mol%) and a photocatalyst Ir(ppy)3 (1 mol%) can accomplish the desired reaction in the presence of Cs2CO3 using DCM as solvent with blue LED irradiation, affording ɤ-ethynyl ester 4a in 78% isolated yield (Table 1, entry 1). No desired product was obtained in the absence of copper or light (entries 2 and 3). The absence of photocatalyst dramatically decreased the reaction efficiency, albeit delivering 4a in 35% yield (entry 4). The selection of ligand has significant impact on the radical cascade process. The employment of tridentate ligand is crucial for the success (entries 5–7). The use of bidentate ligand gave 4a in low yields (entries 8–11). When CuTc was used, 4a was obtained in 66% yield (entry 12). When the reaction was carried out with other bases, such as potassium carbonate or lithium tert-butoxide, no substantial amount of 4a was detected (entries 13 and 14). The use of other chlorine-containing solvents led to diminished yields (entries 15 and 16).

Table 1 Effect of the reaction parametersa

Reaction scope

With the optimal conditions in hand, we turned to test the generality of this reaction. We first evaluated different types of carbonyl derivatives (Fig. 2a). The reaction is applicable to a variety of α-bromomethyl carbonyl functional groups, affording ɤ-alkynylated esters, ketones, secondary and tertiary amides, which are inaccessible otherwise. ɤ-Alkynylated esters with two or one enolizable proton can be obtained in good yields (4a4e). ɤ-Alkynylated lactone could be isolated in moderate yield (4e). Notably, this method is applicable to synthesize α,α-disubstituted ɤ-alkynylated esters in good yields (4f and 4g). It is delighting that ɤ-alkynylated alkyl or aryl ketones could be furnished in good yields (4h4j). This reaction also tolerates secondary and tertiary amides to afford corresponding ɤ-alkynylated amides in synthetically useful yields (4k and 4l). This protocol tolerates a wide variety of carbonyl derivatives, providing a unified directing-group-free alternative to access ɤ-alkynylation of esters, ketones, amides with diverse substitution patterns under mild conditions.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Scope of different carbonyl derivatives and alkynes. a Scope of carbonyl derivatives. b Scope of alkynes. For reaction conditions, see Table 1, entry 1. Ar = 4-MeOC6H4

Next, we tested the scope of alkyne precursors using ethyl α-bromoacetate 1a (Fig. 2b). The reaction tolerates silyl and alkyl alkynes, giving corresponding ɤ-alkynylated esters in good yields (5a5d). Aryl alkynes with electron-donating or -withdrawing group proceeded smoothly under the reaction conditions, affording desired product in good yields (5e5g).

We also examined the scope of alkenes (Fig. 3), which corresponds to the substitution patterns of ɤ- and β-position of the esters using ethyl α-bromoacetate (1a) and trimethylethynyl silicate (3a). Styrenes with electron-donating or -withdrawing substituents at para-, meta- or ortho-position could be all applied in the reaction conditions, affording corresponding ɤ-alkynylated esters in good yields with diverse aryl substitutions at ɤ-position (4a, 4b, 6a6l). Electron-deficient styrenes, which are challenging for radical involved cross-coupling due to the propensity of radical oligomerization, are also good substrates for this reaction (6d and 6e). Vinylpyridine is tolerated in this reaction, furnishing ɤ-pyridinyl substituted ɤ-alkynylester 6m in 52% yield. Cyclic and acyclic internal alkenes could be transformed into the desired products with ɤ- and β-substitutions in moderate yields (6n and 6o). Emamine could be transformed to ɤ-alkynyl ɤ-aminoester 6p in 33% yield. To further demonstrate the potential utility of this protocol, late-stage functionalization of natural product derivatives was examined. Isoflavone, estrone, tocopherol ocurring alkenes could be tolerated under the reaction conditions and be further modified to deliver natural product containing ɤ-alkynylesters in good yields (6q6s).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Scope of alkenes. For reaction conditions, see Table 1, entry 1. When it is applicable, 1:1 dr is observed. [a]Isolated yield on 1.0 mmol scale

Synthetic application

We further demonstrated the synthetic application potential of this reaction using 4a as the model substrate (Fig. 4). Trimethylsily group could be removed under basic conditions, delivering ɤ-alkynyl ester (7a) or ɤ-allenyl ester (7b) in a controllable manner in 82% and 70% yield, respectively. In the presence of sodium hydroxide, 4a was deprotected as well as saponificated, giving the formal ɤ-ethynyl carboxylic acid (7c) in 60% yield, which is the precursor for an inhibitor of serine proteases62. ɤ-Triazole substituted ester (7d) could be obtained in 54% yield via copper catalyzed [3+2] reaction. The triple bond could also be cleaved via ruthenium catalysis to deliver 1,4-dicarboxylic acid (7e) in 70% yield. In the presence of DIBAL-H, δ-alkenyl or δ-alkynyl alcohol (7f and 7g) could be obtained in good yields depending on the reaction conditions, providing a divergent method to functionalize δ-position of alcohol which is inaccessible otherwise. It is noteworthy that ɤ-alkynylated aldehyde (7h) could be obtained in 62% yield, rendering this three-component radical cascade protocol accessible to ɤ-alkynylated acids, esters, amides, ketones, and aldehydes.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Synthetic applications of the ɤ-alkynylated ester. 4a Reaction conditions: (i) K2CO3 (3.0 equiv), MeOH (0.05 M), rt, 2 h. (ii) TBAF (3.0 equiv), THF (0.05 M), rt, 10 h. (iii) NaOH (2.0 M aq.), MeOH (0.1 M), rt, 3.5 h. (iv) K2CO3 (3.0 equiv), MeOH (0.05 M), rt, 2 h, then CuTc (10 mol%), TsN3 (1.0 equiv), toluene, rt, 4 h. v) RuCl3 (5 mol%), NaIO4 (4.0 equiv), CCl4/CH3CN/H2O = 2/2/3, rt, 2 h. (vi) DIBAL-H (5.0 equiv), Et2O, 40 °C, 20 h. (vii) DIBAL-H (3.0 equiv), Et2O, −78 oC, 2 h. (viii) DIBAL-H (1.0 equiv), Et2O, −78 oC, 2 h

Mechanistic investigation

To further understand the reaction process, we carried out a series of experiments to probe the reaction mechanism (Fig. 5). In the presence of TEMPO, the reaction was completely shut down with the formation TEMPO adduct 8 in 60% yield, indicating the formation of radical intermediate M2. The use of 2-cyclopropyl styrene under the standard conditions delivered the radical ring-opening and cyclization product 9, which further suggested the presence of radical intermediate M4. When phenyethynyl copper was used as the catalyst, the desired product 10 was obtained in 66% yield, proving alkynylcopper M1 as one of the intermediates in the catalytic cycle.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Mechanistic investigations. a Radical trap experiment with TEMPO as radical scavenger. b Radical clock experiment using cyclopropyl styrene. c Control experiment using phenylethynyl copper (I) as catalyst

Based on the results and literature, we proposed the following reaction mechanism (Fig. 6). First, ligand ligated copper (I) undergoes transmetalation with alkynyl silicate to generate alkynyl copper (I) species M1, which reduces α-bromomethyl carbonyl derivatives 1 to give radical intermediate M2 and copper (II) intermediate M3 by single electron transfer. M2 could be trapped by alkene 2 to give a new carbon-centered radical M439,40,41,42,43,44,45,46, which recombines with M3 to deliver intermediate M5. M5 could be activated by energy transfer from excited Ir(III) photocatalyst to generate M663, which accelerates reductive elimination to furnish streamlined three-component assembly product and regenerate Cu(I) catalyst. At this stage, the possibility of undergoing direct reductive elimination from M5 to generate final product and Cu (I) species could not be ruled out 64,65.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Mechanistic hypothesis. Proposed mechanism of the copper- and visible-light catalyzed ɤ-alkynylation reaction

Discussion

In summary, we have developed a unified ɤ-alkynylation of esters, ketones, secondary and tertiary amides enabled by the combination of copper- and visible-light catalysis at room temperature. This method features with the exclusive chemoselectivity of alkenes over alkynes, and is applicable to a wide variety of carbonyl derivatives with excellent functional group compatibility. The merger of photocatalysis and copper catalysis along with judicious selection of ligand allows for the streamlined formation of Csp3-sp3 bond and Csp3-sp bond to assemble the carbon chain skeleton and alkynylate ɤ-position from alkene, α-bromomethyl carbonyl precursors, and alkyne silicates, circumventing the tedious synthesis of skeleton. Further synthetic extention provides access to ɤ-alkynylated esters, acids, amides, ketones, and aldehydes. Mechanistic investigation suggests the reaction undergoes copper catalyzed radical cascade reaction, facilitated by energy transfer from excited photocatalyst.

Methods

Synthetic procedures

See Supplementary Methods.

Characterization

See Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figs. 1103 for 1H, 19F and 13C NMR spectra of synthesized products.