Introduction

In temperate forest ecosystems, roots of dominant tree species are colonized by diverse assemblages of ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungal species1,2,3,4,5. EM fungi form mutualistic associations with root tips, called ectomycorrhizas. Ectomycorrhizas act as an interface for nutrient fluxes between soil and trees6,7, where fungi transfer low-availability nutrients from the soil to the host trees and receive carbohydrates in return8,9,10,11. Thus, ectomycorrhizas link the belowground carbon (C) allocation and nutrient dynamics in forest ecosystems12,13,14. Although their role is paramount in soil C accumulation7,15, fungal traits that drive host resource allocation to different fungal taxa within composed assemblages remain poorly understood16. It has been long acknowledged that the supply of host carbohydrates is required to maintain the extensive diversity of EM fungal assemblages17,18 that commonly occurs in individual trees19,20. In contrast to other plant mutualistic associations, such as arbuscular mycorrhizae21,22 or legume–rhizobia23, where the plant carbohydrate supply is correlated with the magnitude of fungal or bacterial nutrient delivery, a direct reciprocal recompense has not been observed in ectomycorrhizas24,25,26,27.

In vascular plants, the transport of photoassimilates from the source to sink organs primarily depends on sink demand. Ectomycorrhizas are new organs formed by fungal and root cells at the root tips28. In ectomycorrhizas, the plant-derived carbohydrate supply provides the substrate for the maintenance of both the plant and fungal cells, including the energy-consuming processes of nutrient uptake, transformation, and transfer. The fungus may induce an additional C sink in the ectomycorrhizas as compared with non-EM root tips29,30, but this is not always the case26, leaving an open question about the size of and contributing factors to C sink in ectomycorrhizas.

After uptake and translocation from roots to leaves, inorganic nitrogen (N) is used for amino acid biosynthesis and is then re-distributed within the plant from source to sink tissues. The primary source of N used for root growth is the phloem-transported organic N from the leaves31. Whether ectomycorrhizas formed with different fungal taxa have distinct effects on internal tree N allocation to root tips remains largely unknown.

The main objective of this study was to examine nutrient concentrations and to determine the sink activity for host resources of ectomycorrhizas. We investigated the incorporation of C and N originating from aboveground leaf assimilation into ectomycorrhizas formed with different fungal taxa in naturally composed assemblages. Since N and C metabolism are linked, and N accumulation varies profoundly among different EM fungal species27,32,33,34, we reasoned that plant C transfer to an EM fungal species is determined not only by fungal biomass26 but also by fungal taxon-specific N utilization. Hence, C provision to an ectomycorrhiza would be related to its taxon-specific C/N stoichiometry. We hypothesized that an EM fungal species with a high C and low N content would be unlikely to have a high demand for host C in contrast to an EM fungal species with low C and high N content. In contrast to C, we expected that host N allocation to ectomycorrhizas reflects the demand of the root cells in the symbiosis and, therefore, would not vary in ectomycorrhizas formed with different fungal species. However, given the large variation among EM species in N acquisition34 and the unknown impact on the N content in the root cells in the symbiosis, we also considered the alternative hypothesis that tree-derived N transfer to ectomycorrhizas is affected by EM fungal species.

To address these hypotheses, we used beech (Fagus sylvatica), representing the most abundant deciduous tree species in Central European temperate forests35. We pulse-labeled young trees colonized with natural EM assemblages aboveground with 15NH4+ and 13CO2 and linked the enrichment of the isotopes with the C and N content in EM fungal species and the relative abundance of the EM fungal species on plant root tips.

Results

N and C are translocated from aboveground tissues into ectomycorrhizal root tips

After dual labeling with 15NH4+ (selected leaves) and 13CO2 (aboveground aerial space), each for 3 days, we found significant enrichment of both labels in all tissues studied along transport path in bark close to the stem bottom, in different parts of the root system, and in ectomycorrhizas (Fig. 1). No changes of 13C enrichment occurred in different root parts between day 5 and day 20 (Fig. 1a), whereas 15N enrichment slightly increased in day 20 in comparison with day 5 (Fig. 1b). The total amounts of newly acquired 13C and 15N in roots were 154.1 ± 18.8 mg 13C and 142.2 ± 29.2 µg 15N (means across both sampling dates of n = 10 plants ± SE). The share of 13C and 15N in fine roots in the pools were 27.1 ± 4.4 mg 13C and 23.3 ± 4.2 µg 15N.

Fig. 1: Enrichment of 13C and 15N in the plant tissues, ectomycorrhizas and rhizosphere soil.
figure 1

a Enrichment of 13C, b enrichment of 15N in bark (BA), coarse roots (CR), fine roots (FR), lateral rootlets (LR), ectomycorrhizas (EM), and rhizosphere soil (RS) 5 and 20 days after the start of 13C pulse labeling. Symbols represent individual measurements. Bars show means (n = 10 per time point and tissue for lateral roots and ectomycorrhizal, n = 5 per time point and tissue for bark, coarse and fine roots, ±SE). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) among label concentrations in different compartments (GLM, HSD post hoc test).

The highest N concentrations were detected in ectomycorrhizas and the highest C concentrations in lateral rootlets (Table 1).

Table 1 Nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) concentrations in different plant compartments and the rhizosphere.

The least 13C enrichment occurred in the rhizosphere, exceeding, however, the level of non-labeled controls (Null hypothesis, P = 0.002) (Fig. 1a). The rhizosphere 13C amount was 1.9 ± 0.3 mg per root system (means across both sampling dates of n = 10 plants ±SE). No significant enrichment in the rhizosphere was observed for 15N (Null hypothesis, P = 0.457) (Fig. 1b).

Ectomycorrhizas exhibit strong fungal taxon-related differences in plant-derived C and N transfer

The beech trees were colonized by 16 different EM fungal species (Fig. 2), whose assembly structures did not vary between day 5 and day 20 (ANOSIM, P = 0.414). Neither root tip vitality (mean: 89.6 ± 2.1%, Student’s t-test, P = 0.772) nor mycorrhizal colonization (mean: 92.6 ± 2.2%, Student’s t-test, P = 0.718) differed between the sampling dates. Among the 16 EM fungal taxa, seven were sufficiently abundant for 13C and 15N analyses and present at each sampling date. These species colonized together about 80% of the inspected EM root tips (Fig. 2). The estimated proportion of fungal tissue in EM root tips ranged from 25.3% (UEM3) to 50.0% (Tomentella punicea) with a mean of 34.0% ± 3.5% (Supplementary Table S1). The UEM (uncultured EM) fungi belonged to the order of Helotiales, which is mainly known for endophytes and saprotrophic species and less for mycorrhizas36. Therefore, we inspected cross sections and confirmed the presence of a Hartig net and hyphal mantle for the UEM species (Supplementary Fig. S2b).

Fig. 2: Relative abundance of ectomycorrhizal species colonizing the roots of young beech trees (Fagus sylvatica).
figure 2

Measurements were conducted on 10 trees per sampling date (D05 and D20). S above the stacked bars indicates the total number of species detected per sampling date.

Ectomycorrhizal root tips showed no significant time-dependent changes of 13C or 15N between day 5 and day 20 (Supplementary Table S2), suggesting that net fluxes of the tracers had ceased.

The fungal species Pachyphlodes conglomerata colonized about 30% of the root tips (Fig. 2). Pachyphlodes (Pezizaceae) are truffle-like fungi that form ectomycorrhizas mainly with Fagaceae37. They showed the strongest 13C enrichment, indicating that ectomycorrhizas formed with this EM species exhibited the strongest sink for 13C at the level of individual root tip and within the community (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. S3a). Ectomycorrhizas with UEM1 (Helotiales) and the basidiomycetes Tomentella punicea showed the second strongest enrichment of 13C, while ectomycorrhizas with the other studied fungal species showed only moderate 13C enrichments (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. S3a). Carbon concentrations in ectomycorrhizas associated with different fungal taxa ranged from about 380 to 440 mg C g−1 dry mass (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3: Enrichment of 13C and 15N and carbon and nitrogen concentrations in distinct ectomycorrhizal fungal species.
figure 3

a 13C enrichment. b Carbon concentration. c 15N enrichment. d Nitrogen concentration. Ectomycorrhizal fungal species names are abbreviated as follows: Pc: Pachyphlodes conglomerata (n = 6), UEM1: uncultured EM 1 (n = 5), UEM2: uncultured EM 2 (n = 5), UEM3: uncultured EM 3 (n = 6), Tp: Tomentella punicea (n = 5), Cg: Cenococcum geophilum (n = 7), To1: Tomentella sp1 (n = 6). Symbols represent individual measurements. Number n in brackets indicate the number of individual trees from which the ectomycorrhizal fungal species were collected. Data are from day 5 and day 20. Bars show means (±SE). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences with P ≤ 0.05 (ANOVA and post hoc test HSD).

The highest 15N enrichment was found in ectomycorrhizas formed with UEM1 (Fig. 3c). Ectomycorrhizas formed with P. conglomerata assumed an intermediate position, while 15N enrichment was low in all other ectomycorrhizas studied here (Fig. 3c). NanoSIMS imaging, using the most abundant ectomycorrhiza with P. conglomerata as an example, showed that 15N enrichment was distributed among root and fungal cells in symbiosis and was higher than the natural abundance of 15N in those tissues (Supplementary Fig. S4). Nitrogen concentrations varied considerably in ectomycorrhizas with different fungal species, ranging from 20 to 40 mg N g−1 dry mass (Fig. 3d).

We tested whether the concentrations of C, N, or the enrichments in 13C or 15N in the ectomycorrhizas with different fungal species were related to the proportion of fungal tissue in the symbioses (as obtained from digital images of the cross sections, Supplementary Table S1). No significant relationships were detected (linear relationships of the fraction of fungal tissue with 13C: R = 0.475, P = 0.282, with C: R = 0.580, P = 0.172, with 15N: R = 0.176, P = 0.704, with N: R = 0.226, P = 0.624).

Lateral rootlets uncover contrasting sink strength for nitrogen and carbon in ectomycorrhizas

Lateral roots are part of the fine root fraction and connect higher-order root branches with the EM root tips (Supplementary Fig. S2a). We reasoned that a correlation between a newly acquired isotope in a lateral root and its attached ectomycorrhiza indicates an influence of the EM fungal species on resource allocation because the own C and N demand of lateral roots was expected to be independent on that of the associated symbiont. We found a significant linear relationship between 13C enrichment in lateral roots and that of the associated taxon-specific ectomycorrhizas (Fig. 4a). Notably, the slope of 1.23 was significantly higher than 1.0 (comparison of regression lines, P = 0.016), indicating a significant enhancement of 13C in ectomycorrhizas compared with the connected lateral root.

Fig. 4: Relationship of isotope enrichment in ectomycorrhizas with the isotope enrichment in the attached lateral rootlets.
figure 4

a 13C. b 15N. Isotope data of a distinct ectomycorrhizal species were plotted against isotope data in the lateral rootlets (LR), which were connected with that ectomycorrhizal species. Symbols refer to individual measurements per plant. Colored symbols refer to the following ectomycorrhizal fungal species: Pachyphlodes conglomerata (black), UEM1: uncultured EM 1 (red), UEM2: uncultured EM 2 (green), UEM3: uncultured EM 3 (blue), Tp: Tomentella punicea (turquoise), Cg: Cenococcum geophilum (pink), To_1: Tomentella sp1 (yellow). Data are from day 5 and day 20.

15N enrichment in lateral roots was also significantly correlated with 15N enrichment in the associated taxon-specific symbiont (Fig. 4b) but the slope of the regression line was only 0.53 and significantly lower than 1.0 (comparison of regression lines: P < 0.001).

Based on the abundance and biomass of the EM species and their enrichments with 13C and 15N, we estimated the EM pool sizes of the transferred 13C and 15N as 1.59 ± 0.19 mg 13C and 0.52 ± 0.08 µg 15N (means of n = 20 plants). The contribution of the individual EM species to the total EM fungal pool size is shown in Supplementary Fig. S3a.

Ectomycorrhizal 13C and 15N allocation are correlated with C/N ratio

We tested whether 13C or 15N enrichments in EM species were related to their C/N ratio. 13C enrichment decreased with increasing C concentrations (R = 0.741, P < 0.001, Supplementary Fig. S5a) and increased with increasing N concentrations in EM species (R = 0.833, P < 0.001, Supplementary Fig. S5b). As the result, 13C enrichment in ectomycorrhizas was negatively correlated with the C/N ratio of the symbiosis (y = −2.49x + 57.1, R = 0.832, P = 0.001, Fig. 5). We found a C/N threshold of about 24, above which almost no 13C allocation to EM species was observed (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5: Relationship of 13C and 15N enrichment in ectomycorrhizas (EM) with their C/N ratio.
figure 5

Circles refer to individual measurements of isotope enrichments in ectomycorrhizal fungal species per plant: Pachyphlodes conglomerata (black), UEM1: uncultured EM 1 (red), UEM2: uncultured EM 2 (green), UEM3: uncultured EM 3 (blue), Tp: Tomentella punicea (turquoise), Cg: Cenococcum geophilum (pink), To_1: Tomentella sp1 (yellow). Open symbols: 15N, closed symbols: 13C. Data are from day 5 and day 20.

15N enrichment showed a similar but weaker relationship with C/N (y = −0.57x + 15.1, R = 0.337, P = 0.041), which notably converged at the same C/N threshold (Fig. 5).

We further tested whether the amounts of 13C and 15N in the biomass of taxon-specific ectomycorrhizas were also related to their C/N ratios. We found a negative relationship of C/N with the EM taxon-specific amounts of 13C and a positive relationship with the EM taxon-specific amounts of 15N (Supplementary Fig. S3b, c).

13C enrichment in ectomycorrhizas is positively associated with ectomycorrhizal species abundance on roots

We furthermore tested whether 13C allocation to ectomycorrhizas was related to the abundance of the respective symbiont. We found a positive relationship of 13C enrichment in EM species with their frequency of root fungal colonization (Fig. 6) but no relationship for 15N enrichment and root colonization (R = 0.233, P = 0.165)

Fig. 6: 13C enrichment in ectomycorrhizal fungal species in relation to their relative abundance on root tips.
figure 6

Circles refer to individual measurements of 13C enrichments in ectomycorrhizal fungal species per plant. Symbol refer to: Pachyphlodes conglomerata (black), UEM1: uncultured EM 1 (red), UEM2: uncultured EM 2 (green), UEM3: uncultured EM 3 (blue), Tp: Tomentella punicea (turquoise), Cg: Cenococcum geophilum (pink), To_1: Tomentella sp1 (yellow). Data are from day 5 and day 20.

Discussion

In this study, we found a tight relationship between the enrichment of photo-assimilated C and C/N ratios of ectomycorrhizal species. This finding supports our hypothesis that EM nutrient balance is related to C allocation to colonized root tips. Furthermore, we found that EM fungal species receiving more C were colonizing more root tips than those receiving only little C. This result is ecologically important because the extent of root colonization is an indicator for the fitness of distinct EM fungal taxa.

We also show that a small but significant fraction of newly assimilated C appeared in the rhizosphere. A major fraction of the rhizosphere 13C was probably located in the extramatrical mycelia of ectomycorrhizas, in agreement with other studies8,11,38,39,40. This assumption is also supported by the finding that after aboveground 13C labeling, 30% of rhizosphere 13C was present in fungi, but only 1% in different prokaryotic organisms such bacteria and actinomycetes41.

In our study, stronger 13C enrichment in ectomycorrhizas than in the lateral root, high EM colonization rates (>90%) and the occurrence of 13C in the rhizosphere corroborate that EM fungi are a sink for plant C25,26. We found that ~6% of the new 13C present in fine roots was located in the EM fraction. Assuming that total amount of 13C found in the rhizosphere also passed through the ectomycorrhizas, ~13% of the 13C in fine roots was allocated to ectomycorrhizas and their associated sinks. These fractions are expected to vary with the exposure time and are also likely affected by tree phenology because the direction of C flux depends on sink activities such as leaf and wood production in spring and summer, and nutrient resorption and allocation to storage pools in fall42,43. In our study, which was conducted after the main phase of leaf and wood production, coarse roots were a great carbon sink, containing ~5 times more 13C than fine roots. Carbon stored in coarse roots can be used to supply ectomycorrhizas when recent photoassimilates are unavailable18.

In the present experiment, nitrophilic fungi such as Pezizaceae, Helotiales, and Thelephoraceae44 were the dominant species, most likely due to use of relatively N-rich soil (rhizosphere C/N = 13.6). Nevertheless, the taxon-specific ectomycorrhizas in these assemblages covered a wide C/N range from about 30 to 7, supporting that the specific fungal nutrient physiology rather than the N concentrations in soil determined fungal N and C concentrations. However, further experiments in soils covering a range of nutrient availabilities are necessary to examine this proposition.

Our findings have important implications for understanding plant-soil nutrient cycling. Högberg et al.13 suggested a model for boreal forests, in which C allocation from trees to ectomycorrhizas drives the forest N cycle affecting soil N availability for plant nutrition by a feedback-loop. In nutrient-poor systems, the feedback-loop is driven towards increased N-limitations because high C allocation to the symbionts enables higher fungal N immobilization. In contrast, under N-rich conditions, plants decrease C allocation to ectomycorrhizas, which triggers higher fungal N export to stabilize the association with the host12,13,45. Our study suggests limits for the operation of the proposed ectomycorrhiza-driven nutrient cycle because under our experimental conditions, the 13C allocation to ectomycorrhizas was almost zero when their C/N ratio was greater than 24. Our results imply that C allocation to ectomycorrhizas, which is not accompanied by N uptake and immobilization in the fungus, would lead to an increase in the EM C/N ratio and consequently result in reduced C flux to the symbiont. In line with this idea, ectomycorrhizas with C. geophilum, which exhibit lower N acquisition abilities than those with P. conglomerata, some Helotiales, or T. punicea31,32,33, showed a low 13C enrichment and a high C/N ratio in the present study. In general, the ability for N immobilization depends on EM species identity32,33,46,47 and their N uptake systems48,49,50,51. Therefore, we speculate that fungal traits for N use efficiency may exert a feedback control on plant C allocation. Further investigation is required to examine the extent to which these fungal traits may vary during longer temporal trajectories and across different environments.

The result that plant-derived N was detected in fungal tissues in ectomycorrhizas deserves attention. Trees circulate N bidirectionally between roots and leaves in xylem and phloem, thereby enabling distribution of N at the whole-tree level between storage pools (mainly stem and coarse roots in deciduous trees) and active growth processes52. Increasing cellular N pools, especially of amino acids, suppress N transport systems and, thus, regulate tree N uptake52. Since N uptake occurs mainly close to the root apex53, knowledge on allocation of host N to root tips is important. We found a correlation between 15N enrichment and the C/N ratio of taxon-specific ectomycorrhizas. 15N enrichment in the lateral rootlets corresponded to that in the attached EM fungal species, providing insights into independent regulation of N fluxes within the root system towards distinct sinks formed by different EM taxa. Since amino acids are unloaded from the phloem54, with a proportion of them being exported to the root apoplast55, it is possible that the observed 15N label in ectomycorrhizas was caused by this mechanism. However, roots also produce and exude other N-bearing compounds apart from amino acids such as nucleosides, strigolactone, and alkaloids56,57,58,59. The biochemical identity of the transferred 15N is, therefore, unclear.

An obvious question is how much N is allocated to ectomycorrhizas compared with C. Based on our data, we cannot provide a conclusive answer because of the time lapse between the 15N and the 13C labeling and the differences in label intensities. However, comparing the 13C/15N ratios, which increased from 259 in roots to 3043 in ectomycorrhizas, in our experiment for each unit of 15N the plant provided 11 units of 13C to the EM root tips. Further studies are required to refine this analysis.

Notably, 15N appeared also in fungal tissues of the ectomycorrhizas. To the best of our knowledge, our results represent the first evidence of plant-derived N presence in the fungal cells. In contrast to C, we found no relationship of plant N allocation to EM root tips and fungal colonization intensity. We can only speculate about the mechanisms resulting in plant-derived N in fungal tissues. EM fungi possess several amino acid transporters60, implying that they have the potential to recapture the plant-exuded N. The absence of a significant 15N enrichment in the rhizosphere may suggest that N was retained within plant-fungal symbiosis. This could indicate that ectomycorrhizas were more “tight” for N than for C or that 15N was diluted by the fungal N pool, while passaging through extramatrical hyphae. Alternatively, it is plausible that plant-derived signaling or defense compounds were specifically targeted to fungal tissues in the ectomycorrhiza.

In conclusion, we show that the C/N ratios of EM fungal species were correlated with plant-derived C and N allocation to root tips (Fig. 7). The tight relationship between isotope enrichment in EM fungal-colonized root tips with corresponding lateral rootlets supports sink activity-driven fluxes of C and N to root tips. These sink activities were stronger for C than for N because the former showed net enrichment and the latter net depletion in EM fungal species compared with the attached rootlets. Overall, these results suggest that the ectomycorrhizal C/N stoichiometry may play a role in influencing the allocation of host resources to symbiosis. A further innovative result was the localization of plant-derived N in the fungal tissue of the symbiosis. Carbon but not N allocation to EM fungal species was related to host colonization and was traced in the rhizosphere. These results fill a gap in our understanding of EM fungal-specific interactions with their host and enhance knowledge required to understand major ecosystem processes such as C and N cycling.

Fig. 7: The route of leaf-assimilated carbon and nitrogen to ectomycorrhizas formed with different fungal taxa.
figure 7

The leaf-assimilated carbon (green solid line), nitrogen (pink solid line), ectomycorrhizas formed with different fungal taxa (blue cases). Numbers indicate the compartments where carbon (13C) and nitrogen (15N) isotope labels applied on the leaf were transported 20 days after labeling application. The left inset represents a cross-section of ectomycorrhiza, illustrating the presence of 13C and 15N in both plant and fungal structures. The enrichments with 13C in the symbiosis decrease with increasing C/N ratio of ectomycorrhizas. A higher fungal nitrogen immobilization from soil (Nmin) may lower the ectomycorrhizal C/N ratio, triggering a higher plant carbon flux to the symbiont. Created with BioRender.com.

Methods

Collection of field-grown beech trees

Young, healthy beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees (n = 40) with fully open leaves were excavated from May 10th to 15th in a deciduous forest (Billinghäuser Schlucht, Göttingen, Latitude: 51°35′15.39″, Longitude: 9°58′57.95″, 362 m above sea level, mean annual temperature 8.5 °C, mean sum of annual precipitation 614 mm). The trees were carefully removed and placed with intact soil layers individually in pots (diameter 183 mm, height 255 mm, corresponding to about 6.5 L soil volume). Soil has been classified as Orthic Rendzina on limestone with L-Mull as the humus type; the soil in this forest has a pH value of 4.9 and contains 36 mg C g−1 and 2.6 mg N g−1 dry weight soil61. Herbs were removed. The trees were kept for about 10 weeks under common garden conditions in Göttingen. The plants were watered regularly and were used in summer (end of July to August) for the labeling experiments. The trees were similar in size (±SE): 133 ± 4 cm height, 12.05 ± 0.29 mm width at the stem base, 0.23 ± 0.02 m2 whole-plant leaf surface area, 7.3 ± 0.6 g leaf biomass, 12.5 ± 1.0 g coarse root and 3.9 ± 1.1 g fine root biomass.

Stable isotope labeling of beech trees

For 15N leaf labeling, three adjacent top, three middle, and three bottom leaves were selected, whose surface was slightly abraded with fine grained abrasive paper (Basic Korn 240, LUX, Wermelskirchen, Germany), and immediately placed in a solution of 20 mM 15NH4Cl (99% NH4Cl, Campro Scientific GmbH, Berlin, Germany) in a reagent vessel with the leaves still attached to the tree. The twig with the feeding leaves in the experimental set-up was placed in a plastic bag to avoid overly evaporation. The surface of the pots was covered with plastic foil to avoid soil contamination. After 72 h the feeding device and soil cover were removed and the 15N fed leaves were cut off to finish 15N uptake. The area of the feeding leaves was scanned and corresponded to a mean of 6% of the total tree leaf area. The latter was determined when the trees were harvested. The labeled leaf areas did not vary among different sets of plants (P = 0.921).

The pots with the trees were then placed in plastic bags, which were sealed at the stem bottom to separate the above- and below-ground compartments (Supplementary Fig. S1a, b). To enable irrigation, a tube was introduced into the bag and placed on top of the soil. The prepared trees were transferred into a gas-tight chamber (Weiss Umwelttechnik, Reiskirchen, Germany). The end of the irrigation tube was installed outside of the chamber and used to supply the trees with water. 12CO2 and 13CO2 were supplied by silicon tubing to the air space of the gas-tight chamber and circulated with the help of valves and a pumping system (Supplementary Fig. S1c). In the chambers, the trees were exposed for an adjustment phase of 2 days to 12CO2, then for 3 days to 13CO2 and then for a chase period of 2 days to 12CO2 before they were removed. The duration of the chase period was chosen according to Sommer et al.62 to achieve maximum 13C enrichment in roots and the labeling intensity was chosen to reach a detectable signal in small amounts of biomass (such as ectomycorrhizas) without any known disturbance of metabolism63,64. To produce 13CO2, 106.98 g Na213CO3 (99 atom-% 13C, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) was dissolved in 2 L of deionized H2O and automatically mixed with 5 M lactate (90% C3H6O3 pur Ph Eur. USP, AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) by a pumping system. During the adjustment phase, the same device was used but supplied with CO2 produced from Na212CO3 (105.99 g in 2 L deionized H2O, KMF Laborchemie Handes GmbH, Lohmar, Germany) instead. When the 12CO2 concentration (senor: Carbocao, GMM220, Driesen+Kern GmbH, Bad Bramstedt, Germany) in the air space dropped below 180 ppm, the pumps were activated and adjusted 12CO2 to 400 ppm. The 13CO2 concentrations were measured by gas chromatography and reached a maximum of 1800 ppm. 13CO2 was applied only during the light phase. During exposure in the chambers, the trees were kept for 16 h under light (420 µmol photons m−2 s−1 of photosynthetically active radiation) at 70% relative air humidity and 20 °C air temperature. After removal from the chambers, the trees were kept indoors, in ambient air with 16 h/8 h light/dark cycles under the same environmental conditions as in the chambers. The first group of trees was harvested immediately after removal (5 days since the start of the 13CO2 treatment) and the second group 15 days later (20 days since the start of the 13CO2 treatment). The experimental exposures were conducted in two independent runs, each with 10 trees of which half were harvested in the first and half in the second group (5 or 20 days of 13CO2 treatment). Ten non-labeled trees maintained indoors under the same environmental conditions as in the labeling chambers and ambient CO2 (397 ± 4 ppm) were used as controls.

Harvest and root morphotyping

The leaves were harvested and scanned to determine plant leaf area. The plant stem was cut off at the soil surface. An ~20 mm long bottom part of the stem was cut and debarked. The bark was dried. The roots with soil were removed from the pots and cautiously shaken. Soil adhering to fine roots was defined as rhizosphere soil. An aliquot was collected with a toothpick (ca. 2 g), and dried. Then the roots were shaken to remove the remaining soil. The total amount of rhizosphere soil (dry) was 54 ± 10 g per root system. The roots were briefly washed and separated into fine (<2 mm diameter) and coarse roots. Subsamples of coarse and fine roots were dried.

Further subsamples of fresh fine roots were viewed under a stereomicroscope (M 205 FA, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and about 400 root tips per plant were classified as vital ectomycorrhizal, vital non-mycorrhizal or dry. Vital and dry root tips were distinguished based on their microscopic appearance, categorizing shrunken and dark brown distorted root tips as dried. This technique was previously validated by stable isotope tracing, demonstrating negligible 13C or 15N transfer to the dry root tips of plants supplied via the soil with labeled glucose or ammonium33,65. The number of root tips in each category (vital non-mycorrhizal, vital mycorrhizal, dry) was counted and used to calculate:

$${{{{{\rm{Mycorrhizal}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{colonization}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{rate}}}}}}\,( \% )= \, {{{{{\rm{Number}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{of}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{vital}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{mycorrhizal}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{tips}}}}}}* 100\\ /({{{{{\rm{number}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{of}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{vital}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{mycorrhizal}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{tips}}}}}}\\ +{{{{{\rm{number}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{vital}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{non}}}}}}-{{{{{\rm{mycorrhizal}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{tips}}}}}}).$$
$${{{{{\rm{Root}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{tip}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{vitality}}}}}}\,( \% )= \, ({{{{{\rm{number}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{of}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{vital}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{mycorrhizal}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{tips}}}}}}\\ +{{{{{\rm{number}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{vital}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{non}}}}}}-{{{{{\rm{mycorrhizal}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{tips}}}}}})* 100\\ /{{{{{\rm{number}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{of}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{all}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{counted}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{tips}}}}}}.$$

Vital ectomycorrhizal root tips were further classified into ectomycorrhizal morphotypes according to fungal characteristics using for instance color, branching, or lengths of emanating hyphae66 and, subsequently counted to determine the relative abundance of the morphotypes in a sample as follows:

Relative abundance of morphotypei = number of root tips with morphotypei/number of vital mycorrhizal root tips

Aliquots of each morphotype consisting of fungal and plant tissues were collected (Supplementary Fig. S2). Because individual trees did not contain all morphotypes in sufficient quantities, the number of replicates per morphotype varied (n = 5 to 7). One subsample was stored at −80 °C for molecular identification, another was fixed in a solution of FAE (formaldehyde 37%:ethanol 70%:acetic acid 97% in proportions of 5:90:5) for Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry, and the rest sample was dried. The lateral root segment connecting the ectomycorrhizal morphotype with the next higher root branch was also collected27 (Supplementary Fig. S2a) and dried.

Identification of morphotypes by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing

The DNA of individual morphotypes was extracted in 100 µl lysis buffer of the innuPrep Plant DNA kit (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) with a pellet mixer (VWR Pellet Mixer, VWR International, Darmstadt, Germany). Further steps were conducted as described by Lang et al.3 using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the fungal rRNA (primers ITS1f (5′CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS4 (5′TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′)) and the Fermentas protocol for polymerase EP 0402 (Fermentas, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Sequencing was conducted by the company Seqlab (Sequence Laboratories, Göttingen, Germany). The sequences were analyzed with Staden package (http://staden.sourceforge.net) and blasted in NCBI GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and UNITE (http://unite.ut.ee) databases. Fungal sequences have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under the accession numbers MK430999 to MK431014.

Image analyses and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)

The morphotype samples were dehydrated by incubation in ethanol solutions of increasing concentrations, 80%, 96%, and 100% for 90 min each. Subsequently, the morphotypes were embedded in Technovit 7100 resin (Heraeus Kulzer GmbH & Co. KG, Hanau, Germany) according to the manufacturer´s instructions. Technovit is a well-established acryl plastic embedding system commonly used in NanoSIMS analyses67,68 because it has negligible N contents. Cross-sections with a thickness of 1.0 µm were cut with an autocut microtome (Ultracut E, Reichert-Jung, Vienna, Austria), stained with toluidine blue36, and were viewed and photographed under a microscope (Axioplan Observer Z1, Carl Zeiss GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). Digital images of the cross sections were used to measure surface areas of root tissue and fungal tissue with ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov). Based on these measurements, we calculated the percentage occupied by fungal structures within ectomycorrhizas as Fungal tissue (%) = area of fungal tissue × 100/total cross-sectional area. Details are shown in Supplementary Table S1. For NanoSIMS imaging, 200 nm thick cross sections were cut using an EM UC6 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The sections were analyzed with a NanoSIMS 50 L instrument (Cameca, Gennevilliers, France) equipped with an 8 kV Cs+ primary ion source69. To reach a steady state of ionization, samples were first implanted applying a primary current of ~100 pA for 1.5 minutes. During the analysis, a current of ~1 pA was employed. The detectors were set to collect 12C14N- and 12C15N- secondary ions. The mass resolving power was adjusted to differentiate 12C15N- from potential interferences such as 13C14N-. Ion images of 512 × 512 pixels were acquired setting a raster size of 30 ×30 μm or 80 ×80 µm, and a dwell time of 5.07 ms/pixel from three consecutive layers. NanoSIMS data processing, including image exportation, drift correction, image stacking, and ratio measurements was performed using the OpenMIMS plugin of Fiji70.

N and C analyses

For analyses of 14N, 15N, 12C, and 13C all dried samples (except morphotypes and lateral roots) were milled and weighed (0.5 to 1.5 mg on a supermicro balance, type S4, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) into tin cartouches (5 × 9 mm, HEKAtech, Wegberg, Germany). Each collected morphotype (Supplementary Fig. S2) and lateral root sample was weighed and used as whole sample in the analysis. Since the whole sample was used, no milling was necessary to obtain representative subsamples. The samples of the labeled and the non-labeled controls were analyzed in an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS; Delta C, Finnigan MAT, Bremen, Germany) in the Center for Stable Isotopes (KOSI, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany). An acetanilide standard (C = 71.09%, N = 10.36%, δ13C = −29.6‰, δ15N = −1.6‰) was measured after each 10th sample and used for point calibration. A second in-house standard (wild boar liver δ13C = −17.3‰), δ15N = 7.3) was used periodically to check for scaling. The standard materials were calibrated against international standards (International Atomic Energy Agency: IAEA-N1 and IAEA-N2 for 15N and NBS18 and IAEA 600 for 13C, https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/ReferenceMaterials/Pages/Stable-Isotopes.aspx). Atom-percent excess (APE) and the 13C enrichment (which is the concentration of newly acquired 13C) were determined as follows:

$${{{{{\rm{APE}}}}}}^{13}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}( \% )=\left({\left(\frac{{\,}^{13}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}{{\,}^{13}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}+{\,}^{12}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}\right)}_{{{{{{{\rm{labelled}}}}}}}}-{\left(\frac{{\,}^{13}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}{{\,}^{13}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}+{\,}^{12}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}\right)}_{{{{{{{\rm{non}}}}}}}-{{{{{{\rm{labelled}}}}}}}}\right)* 100$$
$${\,}^{13}{{\mbox{C}}}\,{{\mbox{enrichment}}}\left({{{{{\rm{mg}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{g}}}}}}^{-1}{{{{{\rm{dry}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{mass}}}}}}\right)=\frac{{{\mbox{APE}}}^{13}{{\mbox{C}}}* 1000}{100}* \frac{({\,}^{12}{{\mbox{C}}}+{\,}^{13}{{\mbox{C}}})({{\mbox{g}}})}{{{\mbox{Dry}}}\,{{\mbox{mass}}}({{\mbox{g}}})}$$

The amount of newly acquired 13C in ectomycorrhizas (per plant) was calculated as

$$ {{{{{{\rm{Ectomycorrhizal}}}}}}}{\,}^{13}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{amount}}}}}}}\,({{{{{{\rm{mg}}}}}}})\\ =\mathop{\sum }\limits_{i=1}^{n}({{\,}^{13}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{\rm{EM}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{species}}}}}}}\,i}\times {{{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{tip}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{biomass}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{\rm{EM}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{species}}}}}}}\,i}\times {{{{{{{\rm{number}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{of}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{tips}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{\rm{EM}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{species}}}}}}}\,i})$$

The number of root tips(EM species i) was calculated as relative abundance(EM species i) × total number of root tips per plant. The mean total number of EM tips per plant was 29215 ± 4361 (n = 25 plants). The root tip biomass(EM species i) for different EM species is reported in Supplementary Table S1.

The amount of newly acquired 13C in roots (per plant) was calculated as

$${{{{{{\rm{Amount}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{of}}}}}}}{\,}^{13}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{in}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{roots}}}}}}}\,({{{{{{\rm{mg}}}}}}})= {{\,}^{13}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{\rm{fine}}}}}}}{{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}}}\times {{{{{{{\rm{biomass}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{\rm{fine}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}}}\\ +{{\,}^{13}{{{{{\rm{C}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{\rm{coarse}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}}}\times {{{{{{{\rm{biomass}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{\rm{coarse}}}}}}}\,{{{{{{\rm{root}}}}}}}}$$

APE 15N, the concentrations of newly acquired 15N and the 15N amounts were calculated accordingly.

Statistics and reproducibility

All source data used for statistical analyses and to produce the graphs and tables have been deposited in Dryad71. Statistical analysis was performed using Statgraphics Centurion XVI (StatPoint, Inc., St Louis, MO, USA). To test whether the data were normal distributed, the plots of the residuals were visually inspected. If the data deviated from normal distribution, they were log-transformed and rechecked. The variance was plotted and checked visually for homogeneity prior to one-way or multivariate analysis of variance. Main factors in the ANOVA were time and tissue. When P ≤ 0.05, a post hoc test was conducted (HSD) to compare means. When time (day 5 and day 20) showed no significant differences at P ≤ 0.05, the sets of both time points were analyzed together applying general linear models and time as random factor. Data are shown as means (±SE, n = 5 or 10) when not indicated otherwise. Linear regression curves between 13C enrichment in lateral roots and associated EM fungal species were compared using the function “comparison of regression lines”. Comparison of the ectomycorrhizal community composition present at different sampling dates was conducted using the Bray Curtis Similarity Index by ANOSIM in PAST software72.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.