Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An unusual bird (Theropoda, Avialae) from the Early Cretaceous of Japan suggests complex evolutionary history of basal birds


The Early Cretaceous basal birds were known largely from just two-dimensionally preserved specimens from north-eastern China (Jehol Biota), which has hindered our understanding of the early evolution of birds. Here, we present a three-dimensionally-preserved skeleton (FPDM-V-9769) of a basal bird from the Early Cretaceous of Fukui, central Japan. Unique features in the pygostyle and humerus allow the assignment of FPDM-V-9769 to a new taxon, Fukuipteryx prima. FPDM-V-9769 exhibits a set of features comparable to that of other basalmost birds including Archaeopteryx. Osteohistological analyses indicate that FPDM-V-9769 is subadult. Phylogenetic analyses resolve F. prima as a non-ornithothoracine avialan basal to Jeholornis and outgroup of the Pygostylia. This phylogenetic result may imply a complex evolutionary history of basal birds. To our knowledge, FPDM-V-9769 represents the first record of the Early Cretaceous non-ornithothoracine avialan outside of the Jehol Biota and increases our understanding of their diversity and distribution during the time.


Recently, our understanding of the evolution of birds during the Early Cretaceous has been dramatically improved by the exceptionally preserved fossils from north-eastern China (Jehol Biota1), north-western China (Mazongshan Fauna2), Spain (Las Hoyas Fauna3), and Brazil (Crato Fauna4,5). We now grasp their general diversification and course of evolution in the late Early Cretaceous. Well-known Archaeopteryx from the Upper Jurassic Solnhofen Limestone of southern Germany is the most basal taxon in the clade Avialae6,7 (we conventionally define a common term birds corresponding to the Avialae in this paper8, realizing the definition of the clade is debated). The Early Cretaceous Jeholorniformes is the next stemward avialan9,10 and lacks the pygostyle, a compound element formed by a series of fused and shortened distal caudal vertebrae. More derived than Jeholorniformes are the clade Pygostylia, which includes birds with pygostyles. Basal pygostylians, including the Confuciusornithidae11,12, Jinguofortisidae13,14, and Sapeornithidae15,16, exhibit pectoral and forelimb features that are less comparable to modern birds than those in the more derived clade Ornithothoraces. The Ornithothoraces includes Enantiornithes (extinct by the end of the Cretaceous)17 and Ornithuromorpha18 (in which modern birds are nested), and both of them are well-adapted to powered flight.

Specifically, multiple lineages of basal birds seem to have independently evolved flight-related morphological characters seen in extant volant birds. For example, while being the most basal avialans that is only surpassed by Archaeopteryx, the Jeholorniformes possesses a pectoral structure implying a capacity for powered flight19. The Confuciusornithidae is the most basal pygostylians that possess an ossified sternum for the attachment of large pectoral muscles, while they retain a scapulocoracoid (fused scapula and coracoid) as in non-avian theropods20. This condition is shared in the Jinguofortithidae, whilst their manual morphology is relatively derived (i.e., strongly curved minor metacarpal, and reduced minor digits)14. The Sapeornithidae bears particularly elongate forelimbs and separated scapula and coracoid, while they do not seem to possess an ossified sternum16. In Enantiornithes and Ornithuromorpha, the pectoral girdle is further refined with an ossified sternum with a large keel, strut-like coracoid, and a U- or V-shaped furcula, along with an advanced degree of bone fusion in the pelvis, forelimbs, and hindlimbs17,18. These observations demonstrate that basal birds performed extensive flight-related experiments on their skeletal structures during their early evolution.

Nearly all the Early Cretaceous non-ornithothoracine birds were known from the Jehol Biota of north-eastern China, the paleoenvironment of which is characterized by a highland lacustrine setting, temperate to relatively cold climate (estimated average temperature is 10 ± 4 °C) and extensive volcanic activity in the surrounding area1,21,22. This palaeogeographic bias hinders not only our understanding of the global distribution of these most-basal clades but also of the evolution of flight-related features in different environments during this critical temporal span. In addition, nearly all the Early Cretaceous birds are two-dimensionally preserved, severely limiting the amount of morphologies that can be confidently reconstructed.

In 2013, the first associated skeleton of an Early Cretaceous bird from Japan was collected in Katsuyama, Fukui, central Japan. Unlike most other Early Cretaceous birds, the specimen is three-dimensionally preserved, and exhibits several autapomorphies, leading to erect a new taxon, Fukuipteryx prima gen. et sp. nov. Multiple morphological features indicate that F. prima is a non-ornithothoracine bird and is the first such record to our knowledge outside north-eastern China. Despite the fact that F. prima possesses a pygostyle, the phylogenetic analysis recovers it as a non-pygostylian avialan basal to Jeholornis. While this peculiar phylogenetic hypothesis may partly result from the subadult nature and incompleteness of the specimen, the study increases our understanding about the complex morphological evolution in early birds with the presence of particularly primitive features in young individuals.


Systematic palaeontology

Theropoda Marsh, 1881

Maniraptora Gauthier, 1986

Avialae Gauthier, 1986

Fukuipteryx prima gen. et sp. nov.


Fukui refers to Fukui Prefecture in central Japan, where the specimen was collected, and pteryx (Latin) for wing; prima (Latin) for primitive, as the species exhibits several primitive morphological features among fossil birds.


FPDM-V-9769 (FPDM: Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum, Fig. 1), a disarticulated but closely associated skeleton, including right surangular; two cervicals; four dorsals including two nearly complete ones, an isolated centrum, and incomplete vertebral arch; incomplete synsacrum composed of two sacrals; five caudals; pygostyle; several dorsal ribs; incomplete furcula; incomplete left and right coracoids; incomplete right ilium; forelimbs including left humerus, incomplete left and complete right ulna, complete left and incomplete right radius, right major metacarpal, left minor metacarpal, left alular digit 1, left major digits 2 and 3, minor digits 3 and 4; and hindlimbs including left and right femur; left and right incomplete tibia; and variably preserved metatarsals II (left), III (incomplete left), and IV (complete left and incomplete right).

Fig. 1

FPDM-V-9769. a Photograph. A box indicates where a sample was taken for osteohistological analyses. b Schematic line drawing of the skeletons. Abbreviations: cev cervical vertebra, co coracoid, dv dorsal vertebra, fe femur, fu furcula, hu humerus, il ilium, mc metacarpal, md manual digit, py pygostyle, ra radius, sv sacral vertebra, ti tibia, ul ulna. Scale bars equal 3 cm in a and b

Type locality and horizon

Kitadani Dinosaur Quarry in the northern part of the city of Katsuyama, Fukui, Japan (Supplementary Fig. 1); the Lower Cretaceous Kitadani Formation (Aptian)23 (see Supplementary Notes for further details).


A pigeon-sized non-ornithothoracine avialan with the following autapomorphies: semicircular depression on the craniodorsal corner of the humeral head, dorsally bowed humeral shaft, and robust pygostyle with incipient spinal processes and paddle-like structure at the distal end.


Most elements are preserved three-dimensionally. Nearly all cranial and mandibular elements are severely damaged, preventing identification, and many axial elements are missing. A series of caudal vertebrae are relatively well-preserved, and many appendicular elements are intact (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Reconstructions and restoration. ac Skeletal reconstructions of FPDM-V-9769 in cranial (a), dorsal (b), and left-lateral (c) views. d Life restoration of Fukuipteryx prima (artwork by M. Yoshida). One side of a cube in each image equals 1 cm

The surangular bears a slender dorsal process that presumably forms the dorsolateral margin of the mandible (Fig. 3a). Caudally, the surangular is perforated by a circular foramen. While the surangular is incomplete and it is difficult to determine the rostral extent of the foramen, its position and circular shape are reminiscent of the caudal mandibular fenestra present in confuciusornithids11,24,25,26 as well as in paravian Anchiornis27 (described as a surangular foramen). While the surangular is mediolaterally compressed, it thickens to form a low hillock just caudal to the putative caudal mandibular fenestra and rostral to the articulation surface for the quadrate, as in confuciusornithids26 (see Supplementary Notes for additional descriptions and comparisons of the surangular).

Fig. 3

Cranial and selected axial elements except caudal vertebrae. a Surangular in medial and lateral views. b Cervical centrum in left lateral, right lateral, cranial, and caudal views from top to bottom. c Dorsal vertebra with incomplete left rib in left lateral, right lateral, cranial, and caudal views from top to bottom. d Dorsal centrum in left lateral, right lateral, cranial, and caudal views from top to bottom. e Synsacrum in left lateral, right lateral, and dorsal views from top to bottom. Abbreviations: cd circular depression, cmf caudal mandibular fenestra, dp dorsal process, le lateral excavation, pf pneumatic foramen. Scale bar equals 1 cm in ae

Two cervical vertebrae are recognized, although they are missing neural arches. The centra are craniocaudally longer than mediolaterally wide, and slightly dorsoventrally compressed caudally. Alternatively, the dorsoventral compression may be a preservational artefact (Fig. 3b). Their cranial articular surface exhibits incipient heterocoelous condition, whereas the caudal articular surface appears slightly concave. Similar observations have been reported in Confuciusornis20 and some enantiornithines28. No pneumatic foramina are recognized on the centra as in Jeholornis but in contrast to Archaeopteryx and some non-avian theropods29. Ventral processes and costal processes are lacking.

The dorsal centra are procoelous with subcircular to subrectangular cranial articular surfaces, and relatively flat caudal articular surface (Fig. 3c). The vertebral foramen is slightly dorsoventrally lower than the articular facet. Pneumatic fossae are present, comparable to those in Confuciusornis20, Sapeornis, and enantiornithines30. Notably, an isolated dorsal centrum bears large and deep, suboval lateral excavations (Fig. 3d) as seen in Confuciusornis20 but not in more stemward avialans such as Jeholornis and Archaeopteryx. In the two complete dorsal vertebrae, the neural spines are low cranially, moderately tall caudally, and craniocaudally wide. Presumably, these vertebrae represent cranial ones. In one incomplete dorsal vertebra lacking the centrum, the spinal process is tall and craniocaudally narrow, suggesting that it represents a caudal one. The transverse process is partially preserved in one dorsal vertebra and is slightly dorsally oriented with respect to the centrum.

The synsacrum is incomplete and only preserves two fused sacral vertebrae and fragmentary neural spines (Fig. 3e). The centra are craniocaudally longer than they are dorsoventrally high, and the cranial and caudal articular facets are nearly flat. The ventral surfaces of the centra are concave, and a prominent lateral ridge is present on the caudoventral end of the caudal one. On the dorsal surface of the centra, two circular depressions are present; whether they are genuine features or preservational artefacts is unclear. The spinal process is low, and the vertebral foramen is large compared to the centra.

FPDM-V-9769 preserves five free caudal vertebrae; whereas seven are reported in Confuciusornis20, five to six are estimated in Jinguofortis14, seven to eight in Sapeornis30, less than eight in enantiornithines31, and six in the basalmost ornithuromorph Archaeornithura18, suggesting F. prima possibly possesses six to eight free caudals. The centra of the more proximal free caudals exhibit suboval articular surfaces in which the cranial articular surface is slightly concave while the caudal articular surface is flat. In the most proximal caudal vertebra among the preserved elements, the neural spine is relatively tall dorsoventrally, but narrow craniocaudally with robust prezygapophyses (Fig. 4a). Two caudal vertebrae are articulated with each other. In these vertebrae, the posterior one bears the lower spinal process reduced to a notch. In addition, the postzygapophyses are craniocaudally longer than the associated centrum. The preserved distalmost free caudal vertebrae are smaller than the preceding ones and lack the centra (Fig. 4b). They exhibit circular vertebral foramen and slender dorsolateral projections. Similar caudal vertebrae are reported in Confuciusornis20, although the dorsolateral projections are longer in F. prima.

Fig. 4

Caudal vertebrae. a Anterior caudal vertebra in left lateral, right lateral, cranial, and caudal views from top to bottom. b Posterior caudal vertebra in left lateral, right lateral, cranial, and caudal views from top to bottom. c Pygostyle in left lateral, right lateral, ventral, cranial, and caudal views from top to bottom. d Sagittal section of the pygostyle under computed tomography image. e Pygostyle of Gallus gallus domesticus in ventral view. Black arrows in c, d, and denote ventromedial canals observed in FPDM-V-9769 and G. gallus domesticus. Abbreviations: ivf intervertebral foramen, ns neural spine, ps paddle-like structure, tp transverse process, vf vertebral foramen. Scale bars equal 5 mm in ac, 2 mm in d, and 5 mm in e

The pygostyle is present and ends with a paddle-like structure (ps in Fig. 4c) somewhat resembling that of the enantiornithine Rapaxavis in ventral view32. The pygostyle is long, robust, and rod-shaped as in confuciusornithids and enantiornithine longipterygids33 (Supplementary Table 1). Incipient neural spines are distinguishable, indicating that it is composed of at least five vertebrae, whereas this number is eight to ten in Confuciusornis20 and four in Sapeornis30. The pygostyle is triangular in transverse section and semi-rectangular in sagittal section, resembling that of Confuciusornis33. Intervertebral foramina are recognizable as shallow depressions ventral to the neural spines. The ventrolateral surfaces bear five small projections on both sides; because the number of these notches match that of the pygostyle-forming vertebra, these may be incipient transverse processes (tp? in Fig. 4c). The ventral surface is laterally lined by a pair of longitudinal ridges that resembles the ventrolateral processes seen in Rapaxavis and other longipterygids32,33, forming a shallow furrow on the ventral surface. On the proximoventral surface of the furrow, a circular canal runs ventromedially into the pygostyle, and the computed tomography (CT) images show that this canal passes the ventral side of the pygostyle to the posterior end (Fig. 4d). The domestic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) exhibits a similar feature which houses the ventral tail vasculature including the aorta artery and caudal veins34 (Fig. 4e). Thus, such features may have already been present in basalmost pygostylians as suggested in that of F. prima. While a vertebral foramen is obscured on the proximal articular surface, CT images reveal a canal bounded by thin walls within a vascularized internal pygostyle (Fig. 4d), resembling the spinal cord channel seen in Confuciusornis and the domestic chicken34. In contrast to adult chickens, where the spinal cord channel is craniocaudally short34, that of F. prima seems to extend more distally. The anterior articular surface of the pygostyle is nearly flat, while the posterior articular surface is inclined to articulate with the distal paddle-like structure. This paddle-like structure is ridged along the midline, forming a triangular transverse section, and gradually becomes dorsoventrally thinner toward the distal end. This structure is found closely associated with the pygostyle and its anterior articular surface conforms with the posterior surface of the pygostyle. It was probably incompletely fused to the rest of the pygostyle and became separated during the preservation.

Five incomplete dorsal ribs are preserved, with one preserving a complete head (Fig. 5a). These ribs are slender, proximally curved but straight distally. Due to the state of preservation, it is unclear whether uncinate processes are present during life.

Fig. 5

Rib, pectoral, and pelvic elements. a Right rib in cranial and caudal views. b Furcula in cranial and caudal views. c Left coracoid in medial, lateral, cranial, and caudal views from top to bottom. d Left ilium in medial and lateral views. Abbreviations: cp caudal projection, bf brevis fossa, gf glenoid fossa, lp lateral process, paw postacetabular wing, sc scapular cotyle. Scale bar equals 1 cm in ad

The furcula is robust and boomerang-shaped (Fig. 5b) as in other non-ornithothoracine birds except Sapeornis13,14,20,35, and some derived non-avian theropods27,36. While its medial portion is damaged to some degree, the clavicular symphysis exhibits a smooth ventral margin, suggesting the absence of the hypocleidium. The interclavicular angle is estimated to be 70°, which is most comparable to that of Chongmingia13. Morphologically, the furcula of F. prima is most similar to that of Confuciusornis20 in bearing a caudal projection with a rounded area at each omal end. As suggested for Confuciusornis, this area may be homologous to the acrocoracoidal articular facet of modern birds20,37. The furcula is in contrast to those of Ornithothoraces; ornithothoracine furcula is deep-U-shaped or V-shaped and slender. The coracoid is unfused with the scapula (Fig. 5c). Although the distomedial part is missing, the preserved portion of the coracoid appears strut-like and morphologically most similar to that of Jeholornis9,10. As in Jeholornis, the lateral process is well-developed and more elongate than in Archaeopteryx and Sapeornis. The scapular cotyle is large and the glenoid facet is robust. An ossified sternum is not present in FPDM-V-9769.

The incomplete ilium only preserves the acetabulum and postacetabular wing (Fig. 5d). Based on the preservation, the ilium (and the rest of the pelvic girdle) of FPDM-V-9769 is presumably unfused to each other nor are they fused to the synsacrum, as in other Early Cretaceous birds and most non-avian theropods38. The overall iliac shape resembles those of non-ornithothoracine birds and enantiornithines38. The postacetabular wing is dorsoventrally low, very mediolaterally compressed, and craniocaudally long. The pubic and ischial peduncles are robust and posteroventrally directed as in basal birds38.

The humerus is longer than the femur (Supplementary Table 1), with a humerus/femur length ratio larger than those of Archaeopteryx, Confuciusornis, Jinguofortis, and Chongmingia13,14 (Supplementary Table 1). The humeral shaft is bowed dorsally (Fig. 6a) unlike in most basal avialans. A wide and shallow capital incision separates the humeral head from the bicipital crest. The pneumotricipital fossa on the proximocaudal surface, a feature typical of many derived birds, is absent. Although the deltopectoral crest is largely incomplete, the preserved portion projects cranially, which is a derived feature absent in other non-ornithothoracine birds and enantiornithines. However, considering that the deltopectoral crest is severely damaged, it is equally likely that the cranial projection represents a preservational artefact. It is unknown whether the deltopectoral crest is perforated as in confuciusornithids and Sapeornis. On the other hand, a semicircular depression is present on the craniodorsal corner of the humeral head and presumably proximal to the deltopectoral crest (scd in Fig. 6a). This feature has not been observed in other extant or extinct birds. The ulna is slender, weakly bowed caudally, and slightly shorter than the humerus (Fig. 6b; Supplementary Table 1), a condition shared with Archaeopteryx and confuciusornithids, but different from most volant birds24. The olecranon is poorly developed as in many other basal birds. No quill knobs for the attachment of the secondary remiges are recognized on the ulnar shaft. The radius is slightly bowed cranially (Fig. 6c). Its proximal end is craniocaudally compressed, while the midshaft is cylindrical. The midshaft of the radius is nearly as robust as that of the ulna, in contrast to other non-ornithothoracines in which the ulna is substantially stouter15,35. The major and minor metacarpals are separated throughout their length. Among non-ornithothoracine avialans, this condition is only seen in Archaeopteryx35. The major metacarpal (Fig. 6d) is robust and slightly bowed dorsally, as seen in Eoconfuciusornis11. A small intermetacarpal tubercle is present on the caudodorsal surface of the shaft in F. prima, a feature absent in other non-ornithuromorph avialans but present in some extant birds37. The minor metacarpal, which appears more slender than the major metacarpal, is bowed caudally (Fig. 6e), but not to the extent seen in Jeholornis and Chongmingia13. The major metacarpal is longer than the minor metacarpal, a condition different from that of enantiornithines17. An intermetacarpal space is presumably present, while smaller than that of Jeholornis and Chongmingia13. The first phalanx of the alular digit (Fig. 6f) is slender and slightly bowed dorsally, as in Eoconfuciusornis11. This phalanx is craniocaudally flattened and tapers distally, rendering the distal end narrower than the proximal end. The second phalanx of the major digit is relatively more robust than other preserved phalanges and bowed caudally as in confuciusornithids24 (Fig. 6g). The proximal and distal ends of this phalanx are expanded dorsoventrally, and the ventral surface is flat to slightly concave. The ungual phalanx of the major digit is slightly more than half the length of its preceding counterpart (Fig. 6h). The extensor and flexor tubercles are small. The third phalanx of the minor digit is slender and gently bowed dorsally (Fig. 6i). The ungual phalanx of the minor digit is incomplete, limiting the observation of morphological features (Fig. 6j). It is small and slightly curved with a blunt end, somewhat resembling that of Archaeopteryx35.

Fig. 6

Forelimb elements. a Left humerus. b Right ulna. c Left radius. d Left major metacarpal. e Left minor metacarpal f Left alular digit 1. g Left major digit 2. h Left major digit 3. i Left minor digit 3. j Left minor digit 4. All elements are in cranial, caudal, dorsal, and ventral views from left to right in a through c, and dorsal, ventral, caudal, and cranial views from left to right in d through j. Abbreviations: dc deltopectoral crest, imt intermetacarpal tubercle, oc olecranon, scd semicircular depression. Scale bar equals 1 cm in aj

The femora are relatively slender (Fig. 7a). They are bowed slightly laterally and cranially as in Confuciusornis20 and Sapeornis30 and bear a short neck that separates a round head from the trochanteric region, as in Confuciusornis20. The greater and lesser trochanters are fused to form a trochanteric crest that approaches to the proximal end of the femur, as in Confuciusornis20 and Chongmingia13. The lateral and medial condyles are tall with deep intercondylar fossa between them. The tibiae are incomplete with the left tibia missing the distal end and the right tibia only preserving the midshaft (Fig. 7b). It is slightly bowed medially, possibly due to post-depositional deformation. The fibular crest extends 1/3 of the length, and a single cnemial crest is present. Among distal tarsals, the lateral-distal tarsal appears to cap the metatarsal IV (Fig. 7c). The metatarsals are unfused throughout their shafts, similar to Archaeopteryx35. Both metatarsals II and IV are slender, while the metatarsal II is slightly longer than the metatarsal IV. The metatarsal IV bears a relatively larger proximal end than the metatarsal II.

Fig. 7

Hindlimb elements. a Left femur. b Right tibia. c Left metatarsals. All elements are in cranial, caudal, medial, and lateral views from left to right. Abbreviations: cc cnemial crest, dt distal tarsals, fc fibular crest, icf intercondylar fossa, tc trochanter crest. Scale bar equals 1 cm in ac

Osteohistological analysis

To assess the ontogenetic stage of FPDM-V-9769, we conducted osteohistological analysis. A bone sample was taken from the midshaft of the left ulna following the standard method39 (Fig. 1a). The ulnar transverse section appears vascular and is constituted predominantly by parallel-fibred bone tissue with longitudinal vascularization as in Archaeopteryx and Jeholornis40 (Fig. 8a). Vascular canals are prominent and semi-circular to oval-shaped in most cases; occasionally transversely elongated canals are present (Fig. 8b). Vascularity decreases toward the periosteal region. It is noted that these canals are also visible in CT images of other long bones, such as the humerus, and exhibit a similar condition (Fig. 8c). The osteocyte lacunae are concentrated in the inner region and semi-circular in shape (Fig. 8b). Unlike Archaeopteryx, Confuciusornis, and Sapeornis, but resembling Jeholornis, the lacunae are not distinct nor densely distributed40,41. The medullary margin is uneven throughout the inner bone surface of the two transverse thin sections. No lines of arrested growth (LAGs) are recognized (Fig. 8a).

Fig. 8

Osteohistological sections. a Transverse thin section of left ulna. Note absence of the lines of arrested growth. b Enlarged view of the portion of the thin section (box in a). Note round and elongated vascular canals (vc), and relatively scarce osteocyte lacunae (ol). c Transverse computed tomographic image of humerus. As in b, round and elongated vascular canals are present. Scale bars equal 5 mm in a, 1 mm in b, and 1 cm in c


The following morphological features indicate F. prima is an avialan: robust pygostyle, robust U-shaped furcula with an interclavicular angle comparable to those of basal birds, strut-like coracoid unfused with scapula, humerus that is the most robust and conspicuous among appendicular elements, and an ulna and radius longer than the femur. Furthermore, as described above, F. prima exhibits numerous primitive features comparable to non-ornithothoracine birds but not to the more crownward taxa. These include: the U-shaped furcula without a hypocleidium as in Archaeopteryx, Jeholornis, confuciusornithids, and jinguofortithids (Fig. 5b), slender and relatively short ulna as in Archaeopteryx and confuciusornithids (Fig. 6b), and unfused major and minor metacarpals and metatarsals as in Archaeopteryx (Figs. 6d, e and 7c). On the other hand, F. prima lacks a series of characters shared by the more derived clade of avialans, namely Ornithothoraces. For example, the furcula is slender and deep U- or V-shaped in ornithothoracines, unlike that of F. prima. The pygostyle of F. prima is robust, rod-like in lateral view, and triangular-shaped in cranial view (Fig. 4c), while those of enantiornithine ornithothoracines are X-shaped in cranial view and those of ornithuromorph ornithothoracines are ploughshare-shaped and compact in lateral view33. The ulna is shorter than the humerus in F. prima in contrast to the proportionally longer ulna of volant ornithothoracines (Fig. 5a, b)13. Finally, despite that F. prima shares several skeletal features with enantiornithines, such as the rod-like pygostyle with paddle-shaped distal end and overall iliac shape, it is clearly different from all enantiornithine birds in having concave scapular cotyle (Fig. 5c), and major metacarpal longer than the minor metacarpal (Fig. 6d, e)20. These lines of evidence demonstrate that F. prima belongs to non-ornithothoracine avialans.

The absence of LAGs in the ulna of FPDM-V-9769 suggests the animal died when it was <1 year old. The presence of large vascular canals in the inner bone tissue suggests that the bird underwent a rapid phase of early development. However, the distribution of the vascular canals decreases in density toward the periosteal region, implying that the growth rate was declining prior to death. Given these observation, FPDM-V-9769 is likely a subadult nearly reaching its skeletal maturity at the time of death. This interpretation is further supported by the relatively medium body size (compared with other Mesozoic birds), and the variable degree of skeletal fusion in the preserved dorsal vertebrae, which would be fully fused when the animal is completely matured42. The unfused metacarpals and metatarsals may further indicate the immature state of FPDM-V-9769.

Although skeletally immature, FPDM-V-9769 exhibits several skeletal morphologies that cannot be exclusively ascribed to ontogenetic variation. For example, the pygostyle is large, robust and well-fused, unlike 7- to 8-week-old chickens where the pygostyle is relatively slender and intervertebral space is discernible in CT images34, suggesting the pygostyle of FPDM-V-9769 is nearly fully formed. A boomerang-shaped furcula is found in juvenile and subadult specimens of Sapeornis43,44, and the furcular shape does not seem to change dramatically during ontogeny in enantiornithines31. The ilium appears to be unfused to other pelvic elements in FPDM-V-9769, while the three pelvic bones are tightly fused in extant birds and some ornithothoracines38. Yet, they remain unfused in most other Early Cretaceous birds, particularly in all non-ornithothoracines, and separate pelvic elements do not necessarily reflect immaturity. Overall humeral shape also stays relatively the same in the growth series of Sapeornis43,44 suggesting that the humerus of F. prima unlikely changes dramatically during later development.

To further explore the phylogenetic position of F. prima, we added FPDM-V-9769 to the most recent dataset targeting the phylogeny of Mesozoic birds14. In coding the character states for F. prima, any characters that are likely affected by the immaturity of the specimen were coded missing. These characters included Char. 64 (number of ankylosed sacral vertebrae), Char. 79 (absence or presence of ossified uncinate processes), Char. 108 (degree of ossification of the sternum), Char. 154 (degree of fusion between the semilunate carpal and metacarpals), Char. 166 (fusion of distal end of the metacarpals), Char. 178 (fusion of pelvic elements), Char. 209 (fusion between the Tibia, calcaneum, and astragalus), Char. 221 (fusion of distal tarsals with metatarsals), and Char. 248 (fusion between scapula and coracoid). Our phylogenetic analyses produced 1264 most parsimonious trees (MPTs) with a length of 1323. The strict consensus tree is fairly resolved, placing F. prima within the Avialae and outside of the clade Ornithothoraces (Fig. 9 and Supplementary Fig. 2). Bremer values are relatively low, reflecting missing characters in F. prima and other taxa. Interestingly, F. prima is resolved basal to the long-tailed Jeholornis, as the outgroup of the clade Pygostylia, despite that F. prima possesses a pygostyle. This may result from a series of primitive features found in F. prima such as simple and robust furcula, unfused pelvis, metacarpals and metatarsals, as well as a well-developed deltopectoral crest on the humerus extending to the midshaft. These features are comparable to those found in Archaeopteryx35 and Jeholornis9,10. Thus, the current phylogenetic position of F. prima may indicate a more complex evolutionary pattern in the body plan of early birds, as demonstrated in another potentially-non-pygostylian bird Chongmingia13. For example, pygostyle-like structures are found in some non-avian theropods45,46,47. Additionally, whereas the pygostyle has been suggested as one of the key flight adaptations in the early evolution of birds23, a recent review argues that the early pygostyle is merely a by-product of the tail reduction to the extreme and unrelated to the flight adaptation10. In the present phylogenetic hypothesis, the fusion of distal caudal vertebrae (Char. 69 in Supplementary Notes) is excluded from the set of synapomorphies for a clade comprising the Confuciusornithidae, Jinguofortithidae, Sapeornis, and Ornithothoraces (Supplementary Fig. 3), the taxa that share the pygostyle and form the clade Pygostylia in previous analyses11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. Given that the pygostyle is present in F. prima, a taxon basal to long-tailed Jeholornis, further tests may be necessary to understand the phylogenetic implications of the presence of the pygostyle in the Avialae.

Fig. 9

Simplified strict consensus tree of 1264 most parsimonious trees with a length of 1323, resulting from analyses with an addition of FPDM-V-9769 to a matrix on fossil birds16. Numbers near each node denote bremer support values. Note that Fukuipteryx prima represents the only Early Cretaceous non-ornithothoracine avialan collected outside of the Jehol Group. Silhouette drawings for Mesozoic birds were created by M.W. Life restoration of F. prima was created by M. Yoshida

Except for the Late Jurassic Archaeopteryx, non-ornithothoracine birds had previously been known only from the Jehol Biota and contemporary deposits in northern Korean Peninsula. The discovery of F. prima further increases the geological distribution of non-ornithothoracine birds. It appears that non-ornithothoracine avialans are not restricted to a relatively cold, highland lacustrine environment in the Early Cretaceous of north-eastern China, but inhabited more temperate, lowland regions such as the one represented by the Kitadani Formation, most likely with other ornithothoracines widespread around the globe. Further exploration of the Early Cretaceous fossil birds outside East Asia are greatly needed to clarify the palaeogeographical distribution of these basal birds. Very recently, several new genera and species of non-ornithothoracine avialans have been described from north-eastern China10,13,14,24. These discoveries and this study suggest non-ornithothoracine avialans may represent a diverse group within the Avialae. The evolution of flight-related apparatus may be more complex than previously thought, as illustrated by the mosaic assembly of non-pygostylian avian morphology and the very presence of a pygostyle in F. prima. Overall, this study demonstrates that further exploratory efforts in the Early Cretaceous sediments, where the occurrence of avian skeletons is limited to none, are important to increase our understanding of the Early Cretaceous birds.


CT experiments

We employed a non-destructive anatomical analysis with a phase-contrast synchrotron micro-CT technique. The CT experiments were conducted at BL20-B2 of SPring-8 (RIKEN/JASRI), Sayo, Hyogo, Japan, with the following acquisition parameters: energy = 70 keV or 113 keV, number of projections = 900 per 180°, propagation distance = 4.2 m, exposure time = 1.0–3.0 s per projection, and pixel size = 12.92–24.1 μm. The tomographic data were converted into 16-bit.tif format and skeletal elements were segmented and rendered with VGStudio 3.1 and Amira 6.2.

Phylogenetic analysis

To assess the phylogenetic position of F. prima, we added FPDM-V-9769 to the most recent dataset on Mesozoic fossil birds16 (Supplementary Notes). The dataset consisted of 280 morphological characters and 71 taxa. We employed TNT v. 1.5 (ref. 48) with the character ordering the same as in ref. 16, all the characters equally weighted, and 35 characters ordered (Supplementary Notes). The analysis was performed with the default setting except for the following: maximum number for trees in memory = equal to 10,000. We used the traditional search to search the MPTs with tree bisection-reconnection algorithm (TBR) where 1000 replicates of random stepwise addition and 10 trees held at each step, 1000 replicates, and 10 trees per replicate. We then conducted a second TBR search using the MPT’s obtained in the previous procedure where branches were collapsed if the minimal branch length was zero. The strict consensus tree was generated based on the MPT’s found after the second TBR search. Bremer values were calculated as the support indices.

Nomenclatural acts

This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the proposed online registration system for the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSIDs to the prefix The LSIDs for this publication are: EF35425E-B0AB-4950-BBA9-F86595BE7094 for the new genus Fukuipteryx, and D7369E30-E95A-415F-8B3E-894BF91F73F7 for the new species F. prima.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Morphological character descriptions and character datasets for phylogenetic analyses are included as Supplementary Notes. The FPDM-V-9769 specimen is housed at the Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum. The rendered three-dimensional model for FPDM-V-9769 is available at Requests for materials can be directed to the corresponding author.


  1. 1.

    Zhou, Z. The Jehol Biota, an Early Cretaceous terrestrial Lagerstätte: new discoveries and implications. Natl. Sci. Rev. 1, 543–559 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Shibata, M. Early Cretaceous iguanodontians from East and Southeast Asia: New Phylogeny and Paleobiogeography (Tohoku University, 2017).

  3. 3.

    Serrano, F. J. et al. Flight reconstruction of two European enantiornithines (Aves, Pygostylia) and the achievement of bounding flight in Early Cretaceous birds. Palaeontology 61, 359–368 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Carvalho, I. et al. A Mesozoic bird from Gondwana preserving feathers. Nat. Commun. 6, 7141 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Martill, D. M., Bechly, G. & Loveridge, R. F. The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil: Window into an Ancient World. (Cambridge University Press, 2007).

  6. 6.

    Turner, A. H., Makovicky, P. J. & Norell, M. A. A Review of Dromaeosaurid Systematics and Paravian Phylogeny. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 371, 1–206 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Xu, X. et al. An integrative approach to understanding bird origins. Science 346, 1253293 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gauthier, J. Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds. Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci. 8, 1–55 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhou, Z. & Zhang, F. A long-tailed, seed-eating bird from the Early Cretaceous of China. Nature 418, 405–409 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lefèvre, U., Hu, D., Escuillié, F., Dyke, G. & Godefroit, P. A new long-tailed basal bird from the Lower Cretaceous of north-eastern China. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 113, 790–804 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang, F. C., Zhou, Z. H. & Benton, M. J. A primitive confuciusornithid bird from China and its implications for early avian flight. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 51, 625–639 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang, M., O’Connor, J. K. & Zhou, Z. A taxonomical revision of the Confuciusornithiformes (Aves: Pygostylia). Vertebr. Palasiat. 1–38 (2018).

  13. 13.

    Wang, M., Wang, X., Wang, Y. & Zhou, Z. A new basal bird from China with implications for morphological diversity in early birds. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–12 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang, M., Stidham, T. A. & Zhou, Z. A new clade of basal Early Cretaceous pygostylian birds and developmental plasticity of the avian shoulder girdle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 10708–10713 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Zhou, Z. & Zhang, F. Largest bird from the Early Cretaceous and its implications for the earliest avian ecological diversification. Naturwissenschaften 89, 34–38 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Provini, P., Zhou, Z. H. & Zhang, F. C. A new species of the basal bird Sapeornis from the Early Cretaceous of Liaoning, China. Vertebr. Palasiat. 47, 194–232 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    O’Connor, J. K. A Systematic Review of Enantiornithes (Aves: Ornithothoraces) (University of Southern California, 2009).

  18. 18.

    Wang, M. et al. The oldest record of Ornithuromorpha from the Early Cretaceous of China. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–9 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Li, D., Sullivan, C., Zhou, Z. & Zhang, F. Basal birds from China: a brief review. Chin. Birds 1, 83–96 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chiappe, L. M., Shu’an, J., Qiang, J. & Norell, Ma Anatomy and systematics of the Confuciusornithidae (Theropoda: Aves) from the Late Mesozoic of Northeastern China. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 242, 1–89 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhou, Z. Evolutionary radiation of the Jehol Biota: chronological and ecological perspectives. Geol. J. 41, 377–393 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Amiot, R. et al. Environment and ecology of East Asian dinosaurs during the Early Cretaceous inferred from stable oxygen and carbon isotopes in apatite. J. Asian Earth Sci. 98, 358–370 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sano, S. New view of the stratigraphy of the Tetori Group in Central Japan. Mem. Fukui Prefect. Dinosaur Mus. 14, 25–61 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wang, M. & Zhou, Z. A new confuciusornithid (Aves: Pygostylia) from the Early Cretaceous increases the morphological disparity of the Confuciusornithidae. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. zly045, (2018).

  25. 25.

    Hou, L., Martin, L. D., Zhou, Z., Feduccia, A. & Zhang, F. A diapsid skull in a new species of the primitive bird Confuciusornis. Nature 399, 679–682 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Elzanowski, A., Manegold, A. & Peters, D. S. Redescription of a skull of Confuciusornis sanctus. Archaeopteryx 23, 51–55 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Guo, X., Li, X. & Jia, S. Morphological and Phylogenetic study based on new materials of Anchiornis huxleyi (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from Jianchang, Western Liaoning, China. Acta Geol. Sin. 92, 1–15 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sanz, L. et al. A nestling bird from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain: implications for avian skull and neck evolution. Science 276, 1543–1546 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhou, Z. & Zhang, F. Jeholornis compared to Archaeopteryx, with a new understanding of the earliest avian evolution. Naturwissenschaften 90, 220–225 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zhou, Z. & Zhang, F. Anatomy of the primitive bird Sapeornis chaoyangensis from the Early Cretaceous of Liaoning, China. Can. J. Earth Sci. 40, 731–747 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Knoll, F. et al. A diminutive perinate European Enantiornithes reveals an asynchronous ossification pattern in early birds. Nat. Commun. 9, 937 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    O’Connor, J. K., Chiappe, L. M., Gao, C. & Zhao, B. Anatomy of the Early Cretaceous Enantiornithine bird Rapaxavis pani. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 56, 463–475 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang, W. & O’Connor, J. K. Morphological coevolution of the pygostyle and tail feathers in Early Cretaceous birds. Vertebr. Palasiat. 55, 1–26 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rashid, D. J. et al. Avian tail ontogeny, pygostyle formation, and interpretation of juvenile Mesozoic specimens. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–12 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mayr, G., Pohl, B., Hartman, S. & Peters, D. S. The tenth skeletal specimen of Archaeopteryx. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 149, 97–116 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Xu, X., You, H., Du, K. & Han, F. An Archaeopteryx-like theropod from China and the origin of Avialae. Nature 475, 465–470 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Baumel, J. J. & Witmer, L. M. Osteologia. In Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium (eds Baumel, J. J. et al.) 45–131 (Harvard Univ Nuttall Ornithological, 1993).

  38. 38.

    Wang, M., Li, Z. & Zhou, Z. Insight into the growth pattern and bone fusion of basal birds from an Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11470–11475 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Padian, K. & Lamm, E. T. Bone Histology of Fossil Tetrapods: Issues, Methods, and Databases (University of California Press, 2013).

  40. 40.

    Erickson, G. M. et al. Was dinosaurian physiology inherited by birds? Reconciling slow growth in Archaeopteryx. PLoS ONE 4, e7390 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chinsamy, A., Chiappe, L. M., Marugán-Lobón, J., Gao, C. & Zhang, F. Gender identification of the Mesozoic bird Confuciusornis sanctus. Nat. Commun. 4, 1381 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Irmis, R. B. Axial skeleton ontogeny in the parasuchia (archosauria: pseudosuchia) and its implications for ontogenetic determination in archosaurs. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 27, 350–361 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Pu, H. et al. A new juvenile specimen of Sapeornis (Pygostylia: Aves) from the Lower Cretaceous of Northeast China and allometric scaling of this basal bird. Paleontol. Res. 17, 27–38 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Gao, C. et al. A subadult specimen of the Early Cretaceous bird Sapeornis chaoyangensis and a taxonomic reassessment of sapeornithids. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 32, 1103–1112 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zhang, F., Zhou, Z., Xu, X., Wang, X. & Sullivan, C. A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran from China with elongate ribbon-like feathers. Nature 455, 1105–1108 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Xu, X., Cheng, Y., Wang, X. & Chang, C. Pygostyle-like structure from Beipiaosaurus (Theropoda, Therizinosauroidea) from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of Liaoning, China. Acta Geol. Sin. 77, 294–298 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Barsbold, R. et al. A pygostyle from a non-avian theropod. Nature 403, 155–156 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Goloboff, P., Farris, S. & Nixon, K. TNT, a free programm for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24, 774–786 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank staffs and excavation crews at FPDM for helping excavation and specimen preparation. Among the colleagues at FPDM, we express our gratitude particularly to T. Sekiya who assisted the phylogenetic analysis, H. Yukawa who shared his knowledge on the geological setting, and S. Hattori who helped reconstruction of the skeleton. The Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) approved our CT experiments at the BL20-B2 of SPring-8 (Proposal Numbers 2017A1708 and 2017B1756), to which we are grateful. K. Uesugi and M. Hoshino at JASRI assisted the experiments during our work at SPring-8. Y. Deyama, M. Nakanishi, and Y. Nakamura at Fukui Prefectural University assisted the segmentation of CT images. M. Yoshida at Kobe Design University created skeletal reconstruction and life restoration of the specimen. We are grateful to Y. O’Connor for correcting English of the manuscript. The research was funded by Prefectural Government of Fukui (28-11).

Author information




T.I. and Y.A. designed the project and performed the research, T.I., S.K. and K.M. conducted the CT experiments, M.S. supervised the excavation and initial preparation of the specimen, and T.I., M.W. and Z.Z. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Imai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imai, T., Azuma, Y., Kawabe, S. et al. An unusual bird (Theropoda, Avialae) from the Early Cretaceous of Japan suggests complex evolutionary history of basal birds. Commun Biol 2, 399 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing