Electrochemical transformations in non-aqueous solvents are important for synthetic and energy storage applications. Use of non-polar gaseous reactants such as nitrogen and hydrogen in non-aqueous solvents is limited by their low solubility and slow transport. Conventional gas diffusion electrodes improve the transport of gaseous species in aqueous electrolytes by facilitating efficient gas–liquid contacting in the vicinity of the electrode. Their use with non-aqueous solvents is hampered by the absence of hydrophobic repulsion between the liquid phase and carbon fibre support. Herein we report a method to overcome transport limitations in tetrahydrofuran using a stainless steel cloth-based support for ammonia synthesis paired with hydrogen oxidation. An ammonia partial current density of 8.8 ± 1.4 mA cm−2 and a Faradaic efficiency of 35 ± 6% are obtained using a lithium-mediated approach. Hydrogen oxidation current densities of up to 25 mA cm−2 are obtained in two non-aqueous solvents with near-unity Faradaic efficiency. The approach is then applied to produce ammonia from nitrogen and water-splitting-derived hydrogen.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction to Produce Hydrogen Peroxide: Rational Design from Single-Atom Catalysts to Devices
Electrochemical Energy Reviews Open Access 02 September 2022
Understanding potential-dependent competition between electrocatalytic dinitrogen and proton reduction reactions
Nature Communications Open Access 16 July 2021
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data that support the plots in this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Schiffer, Z. J. & Manthiram, K. Electrification and decarbonization of the chemical industry. Joule 1, 10–14 (2017).
Yan, M., Kawamata, Y. & Baran, P. S. Synthetic organic electrochemistry: calling all engineers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 4149–4155 (2018).
Chen, J. G. et al. Beyond fossil fuel-driven nitrogen transformations. Science 360, eaar6611 (2018).
Soloveichik, G. Electrochemical synthesis of ammonia as a potential alternative to the Haber–Bosch process. Nat. Catal. 2, 377–380 (2019).
Shipman, M. A. & Symes, M. D. Recent progress towards the electrosynthesis of ammonia from sustainable resources. Catal. Today 286, 57–68 (2017).
Comer, B. M. et al. Prospects and challenges for solar fertilizers. Joule 3, 1578–1605 (2019).
Suryanto, B. H. R. et al. Challenges and prospects in the catalysis of electroreduction of nitrogen to ammonia. Nat. Catal. 2, 290–296 (2019).
Foster, S. L. et al. Catalysts for nitrogen reduction to ammonia. Nat. Catal. 1, 490–500 (2018).
Jiao, F. & Xu, B. Electrochemical ammonia synthesis and ammonia fuel cells. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805173 (2019).
Davis, S. J. et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 360, eaas9793 (2018).
Liu, X., Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M. & Qiao, S.-Z. Building up a picture of the electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction activity of transition metal single-atom catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 9664–9672 (2019).
Peters, B. K. et al. Scalable and safe synthetic organic electroreduction inspired by Li-ion battery chemistry. Science 363, 838–845 (2019).
Matthessen, R., Fransaer, J., Binnemans, K. & De Vos, D. E. Electrocarboxylation: towards sustainable and efficient synthesis of valuable carboxylic acids. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 10, 2484–2500 (2014).
Möhle, S. et al. Modern electrochemical aspects for the synthesis of value-added organic products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 6018–6041 (2018).
McEnaney, J. M. et al. Ammonia synthesis from N2 and H2O using a lithium cycling electrification strategy at atmospheric pressure. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1621–1630 (2017).
Kim, K., Chen, Y., Han, J.-I., Yoon, H. C. & Li, W. Lithium-mediated ammonia synthesis from water and nitrogen: a membrane-free approach enabled by an immiscible aqueous/organic hybrid electrolyte system. Green Chem. 21, 3839–3845 (2019).
Kim, K. et al. Electrochemical synthesis of ammonia from water and nitrogen: a lithium-mediated approach using lithium-ion conducting glass ceramics. ChemSusChem 11, 120–124 (2018).
Kim, K. et al. Lithium-mediated ammonia electro-synthesis: effect of CsClO4 on lithium plating efficiency and ammonia synthesis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F1027–F1031 (2018).
McEnaney, J. M. et al. Electro-thermochemical Li cycling for NH3 synthesis from N2 and H2O. US patent US20180029895A1 (2019).
Lazouski, N., Schiffer, Z. J., Williams, K. & Manthiram, K. Understanding continuous lithium-mediated electrochemical nitrogen reduction. Joule 3, 1127–1139 (2019).
Andersen, S. Z. et al. A rigorous electrochemical ammonia synthesis protocol with quantitative isotope measurements. Nature 570, 504–508 (2019).
Tsuneto, A., Kudo, A. & Sakata, T. Lithium-mediated electrochemical reduction of high pressure N2 to NH3. J. Electroanal. Chem. 367, 183–188 (1994).
Schwalbe, J. A. et al. A combined theory‐experiment analysis of the surface species in lithium mediated NH3 electrosynthesis. ChemElectroChem 7, 1542–1549 (2020).
Singh, A. R. et al. Strategies toward selective electrochemical ammonia synthesis. ACS Catal. 9, 8316–8324 (2019).
Gibanel, F., López, M. C., Royo, F. M., Santafé, J. & Urieta, J. S. Solubility of nonpolar gases in tetrahydrofuran at 0 to 30 °C and 101.33 kPa partial pressure of gas. J. Solut. Chem. 22, 211–217 (1993).
Bard, A. J. & Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods. Fundamentals and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2001).
Zhou, F. et al. Electro-synthesis of ammonia from nitrogen at ambient temperature and pressure in ionic liquids. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2516–2520 (2017).
Mathur, V. & Crawford, J. Fundamentals of gas diffusion layers in PEM fuel cells. Recent Trends Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 400, 116–128 (2007).
Litster, S. & McLean, G. PEM fuel cell electrodes. J. Power Sources 130, 61–76 (2004).
Ripatti, D. S., Veltman, T. R. & Kanan, M. W. Carbon monoxide gas diffusion electrolysis that produces concentrated C2 products with high single-pass conversion. Joule 3, 240–256 (2018).
Ren, S. et al. Molecular electrocatalysts can mediate fast, selective CO2 reduction in a flow cell. Science 365, 367–369 (2019).
Higgins, D., Hahn, C., Xiang, C., Jaramillo, T. F. & Weber, A. Z. Gas-diffusion electrodes for carbon dioxide reduction: a new paradigm. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 317–324 (2019).
Burdyny, T. & Smith, W. A. CO2 Reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes and why catalytic performance must be assessed at commercially-relevant conditions. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1442–1453 (2019).
Weng, L. C., Bell, A. T. & Weber, A. Z. Modeling gas-diffusion electrodes for CO2 reduction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 16973–16984 (2018).
Tran, C., Yang, X.-Q. & Qu, D. Investigation of the gas-diffusion-electrode used as lithium/air cathode in non-aqueous electrolyte and the importance of carbon material porosity. J. Power Sources 195, 2057–2063 (2010).
Balaish, M., Kraytsberg, A. & Ein-Eli, Y. Realization of an artificial three-phase reaction zone in a Li–air battery. ChemElectroChem 1, 90–94 (2014).
Gourdin, G., Xiao, N., McCulloch, W. & Wu, Y. Use of polarization curves and impedance analyses to optimize the ‘triple-phase boundary’ in K–O2 batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 2925–2934 (2019).
Santamaria, A. D., Das, P. K., MacDonald, J. C. & Weber, A. Z. Liquid-water interactions with gas-diffusion-layer surfaces. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, F1184–F1193 (2014).
Morgan, E. R., Manwell, J. F. & McGowan, J. G. Sustainable ammonia production from U.S. offshore wind farms: a techno-economic review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 9554–9567 (2017).
Greenlee, L. F., Renner, J. N. & Foster, S. L. The use of controls for consistent and accurate measurements of electrocatalytic ammonia synthesis from dinitrogen. ACS Catal. 8, 7820–7827 (2018).
Kibsgaard, J., Nørskov, J. K. & Chorkendorff, I. The difficulty of proving electrochemical ammonia synthesis. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 2986–2988 (2019).
NREL Equipment Design and Cost Estimation for Small Modular Biomass Systems, Synthesis Gas Cleanup and Oxygen Separation Equipment Subcontract report (Nexant Inc., 2006); http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/39946.pdf
Verdouw, H., Van Echteld, C. J. A. & Dekkers, E. M. J. Ammonia determination based on indophenol formation with sodium salicylate. Water Res. 12, 399–402 (1978).
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. 1944007 and the MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI) seed fund. N.L. acknowledges support by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under grant no. 1122374. We thank M. Wolski of Daramic for providing us with polyporous separator samples.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
a, A comparison between the Faradaic efficiency toward ammonia when various gases are fed to the cell. When using N2 with different isotopic compositions, the ammonia yields are practically identical, which is a sign that N2 reduction is responsible for ammonia formation21. There is little to no ammonia formed when Ar is used as the feed gas and in the absence of current. Vertical error bars represent the uncertainty in Faradaic efficiency quantification of a single experiment. b, The amount of ammonia quantified in the base and acid traps used to clean the inlet gas, and the concentration of ammonia in a post-cell acid trap for comparison. c, Unscaled NMR spectra of electrolyte and acid trap solutions. When 14N2 is used as the feed gas, only a triplet from 14NH4+ is detected in both the trap and solution, while both 15NH4+ and 14NH4+ are detected when 15N2 is fed. ~92% of the NH4+ is 15NH4, which suggests some 14N2 contamination in the experiment, as the nominal isotopic content of the 15N2 is 98%. The peaks shift slightly due to differences in solvent composition (THF-water mixtures). The peak at ~6.87 is from butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) found in the THF. The 25 mA experiments were performed by using a 3-compartment cell with a platinum foil anode, while the 20 mA experiments used a cell with no separator between electrolyte compartments and a Pt/SSC anode.
About this article
Cite this article
Lazouski, N., Chung, M., Williams, K. et al. Non-aqueous gas diffusion electrodes for rapid ammonia synthesis from nitrogen and water-splitting-derived hydrogen. Nat Catal 3, 463–469 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-0455-8
This article is cited by
Rare Metals (2023)
Nature Energy (2022)
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities (2022)