Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Electric-field control of interfacial spin–orbit fields

## Abstract

Current-induced spin–orbit magnetic fields, which arise in single-crystalline ferromagnets with broken inversion symmetry and in non-magnetic metal/ferromagnetic metal bilayers, produce spin–orbit torques that can be used to manipulate the magnetization of a ferromagnet. In single-crystalline Fe/GaAs (001) heterostructures, for example, interfacial spin–orbit magnetic fields emerge at the Fe/GaAs interface due to the lack of inversion symmetry. To develop low-power spin–orbit torque devices, it is important to have electric-field control over such spin–orbit magnetic fields. Here, we show that the current-induced spin–orbit magnetic fields at the Fe/GaAs (001) interface can be controlled with an electric field. In particular, by applying a gate voltage across the Fe/GaAs interface, the interfacial spin–orbit field vector acting on Fe can be robustly modulated via a change in the magnitude of the interfacial spin–orbit interaction. Our results illustrate that the electric field in a Schottky barrier is capable of modifying spin–orbit magnetic fields, an effect that could be used to develop spin–orbit torque devices with low power consumption.

## Access options

from\$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

## References

1. 1.

Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature 476, 189–193 (2011).

2. 2.

Liu, L. Q. et al. Spin–torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science 336, 555–558 (2012).

3. 3.

Kim, J. et al. Layer thickness dependence of the current-induced effective field vector in Ta|CoFeB|MgO. Nat. Mater. 12, 240–245 (2013).

4. 4.

Garello, K. et al. Symmetry and magnitude of spin–orbit torques in ferromagnetic heterostructures. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 587–593 (2013).

5. 5.

Soumyanarayanan, A., Reyren, N., Fert, A. & Panagopoulos, C. Emergent phenomena induced by spin–orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces. Nature 539, 509–517 (2016).

6. 6.

Mellnik, A. R. et al. Spin-transfer torque generated by a topological insulator. Nature 511, 449–451 (2014).

7. 7.

Fan, Y. B. et al. Magnetization switching through giant spin–orbit torque in a magnetically doped topological insulator heterostructure. Nat. Mater. 13, 699–704 (2014).

8. 8.

Kondou, K. et al. Fermi-level-dependent charge-to-spin current conversion by Dirac surface states of topological insulators. Nat. Phys. 12, 1027–1031 (2016).

9. 9.

Lesne, E. et al. Highly efficient and tunable spin-to-charge conversion through Rashba coupling at oxide interfaces. Nat. Mater. 15, 1261–1266 (2016).

10. 10.

Rojas-Sánchez, J.-C. et al. Spin to charge conversion at room temperature by spin pumping into a new type of topological insulator: α-Sn films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 096602 (2016).

11. 11.

Ohno, H. et al. Electric-field control of ferromagnetism. Nature 408, 944–946 (2000).

12. 12.

Matsukura, F., Tokura, Y. & Ohno, H. Control of magnetism by electric fields. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 209–220 (2015).

13. 13.

Fan, Y. B. et al. Electric-field control of spin–orbit torque in a magnetically doped topological insulator. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 352–359 (2016).

14. 14.

Liu, R. H., Lim, W. L. & Urazhdin, S. Control of current-induced spin–orbit effects in a ferromagnetic heterostructures by electric field. Phys. Rev. B. 89, 220409(R) (2014).

15. 15.

Weisheit, M. et al. Electric field-induced modification of magnetism in thin-film ferromagnets. Science 315, 349–351 (2007).

16. 16.

Chernyshov, A. et al. Evidence for reversible control of magnetization in a ferromagnetic material by means of spin–orbit magnetic field. Nat. Phys. 5, 656–659 (2009).

17. 17.

Endo, M., Matsukura, F. & Ohno, H. Current induced effective magnetic field and magnetization reversal in uniaxial anisotropy (Ga,Mn)As. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 222501 (2010).

18. 18.

Fang, D. et al. Spin–orbit-driven ferromagnetic resonance. Nat. Nanotech. 6, 413–417 (2011).

19. 19.

Kurebayashi, H. et al. An antidamping spin–orbit torque originating from the Berry curvature. Nat. Nanotech. 9, 211–217 (2014).

20. 20.

Ciccarelli, C. et al. Room-temperature spin–orbit torque in NiMnSb. Nat. Phys. 12, 855–860 (2016).

21. 21.

Chen, L. et al. Robust spin–orbit torque and spin–galvanic effect at the Fe/GaAs (001) interface at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 7, 13802 (2016).

22. 22.

Gmitra, M., Matos-Abiague, A., Draxl, C. & Fabian, J. Magnetic control of spin-orbit fields: a first-principle study of Fe/GaAs junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 036603 (2013).

23. 23.

Fabian, J., Matos-Abiague, A., Ertler, C., Stano, P. & Žutić, I. Semiconductor spintronics. Acta. Phys. Slov. 57, 565–907 (2007).

24. 24.

Nitta, J., Akazaki, T., Takayanagi, H. & Enoki, T. Gate control of spin–orbit interaction in an inverted In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As heterostructure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1335–1338 (1997).

25. 25.

Sze, S. M. Semiconductor Devices 2nd edn (Wiley, New York, 2002).

26. 26.

Liu, C. Electrical detection of ferromagnetic resonance in ferromagnetic/n-GaAs heterostructures by tunneling anisotropic magnetoresistance. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 212401 (2014).

27. 27.

Liu, C. et al. Dynamic detection of electron spin accumulation in ferromagnet–semiconductor devices by ferromagnetic resonance. Nat. Commun. 7, 10296 (2016).

28. 28.

Jonker, B. T., Glembocki, O. J., Holm, R. T. & Wagner, R. J. Enhanced carrier lifetimes and suppression of midgap states in GaAs at a magnetic metal interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4886–4889 (1997).

29. 29.

Qaiumzadeh, A., Duine, R. A. & Titov, M. Spin–orbit torques in two-dimensional Rashba ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 92, 014402 (2015).

30. 30.

Kato, Y. K., Myer, R. C., Gossard, A. C. & Awschalom, D. D. Current-induced spin polarization in strained semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 176601 (2004).

31. 31.

Stern, N. P. et al. Current-induced polarization and the spin Hall effect at room temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 126603 (2006).

32. 32.

Engel, H.-A., Rashba, E. I. & Halperin, B. I. Out-of-plane spin polarization from in-plane and magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 036602 (2007).

33. 33.

Ishihara, J., Ohno, Y. & Ohno, H. Direct imaging of gate-controlled persistent spin helix state in a modulation-doped GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well. Appl. Phys. Express 7, 013001 (2014).

34. 34.

Luengo-Kovac, M. et al. Gate control of the spin mobility through the modification of the spin–orbit interaction in two-dimensional system. Phys. Rev. B 95, 245315 (2017).

35. 35.

Dettwiler, F. et al. Stretchable persistent spin helices in GaAs quantum wells. Phys. Rev. X 7, 031010 (2017).

36. 36.

Gambardella, P. & Miron, I. M. Current-induced spin–orbit torques. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 3175–3197 (2011).

37. 37.

Slonczewski, J. C. Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers. J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 159, L1–L7 (1996).

38. 38.

Berger, L. Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current. Phys. Rev. B 54, 9353–9358 (1996).

## Acknowledgements

L.C. thanks M. Kammermeier, M. Buchner and C. Gorini for fruitful discussions. L.C. acknowledges support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. This work was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG) via grants SFB 689 and SFB 1277.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

L.C. planned the study. L.C. and R.I. fabricated the devices. L.C. collected and analysed the data. M.K., D.S. and D.B. grew the samples. M.V. carried out the COMSOL simulations. M.G. and J.F. conducted first-principle calculations and provided theoretical input. L.C. wrote the manuscript with input from J.F., C.H.B. and D.W. All authors discussed the results.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. H. Back.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Supplementary information

### Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–4 and Supplementary Figures 1–7

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Chen, L., Gmitra, M., Vogel, M. et al. Electric-field control of interfacial spin–orbit fields. Nat Electron 1, 350–355 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0085-1

• Accepted:

• Published:

• Issue Date:

• ### Towards magnonic devices based on voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy

• Bivas Rana
•  & YoshiChika Otani

Communications Physics (2019)

• ### Electrical control at the interface

• Daichi Chiba

Nature Electronics (2018)