Introduction

As a leading global health concern, stroke is a predominant cause of disability and mortality1. Ischemic stroke accounts for approximately 85% of all stroke cases, imposing a heavy burden on both society and families2. The pathogenesis of ischemic stroke involves the complicated process, including thrombosis, inadequate cerebral blood flow, and subsequent hypoxic-ischemic injury to brain cells3. Beyond traditional vascular risk factors, extreme temperatures and seasonal variability have been confirmed as potential risk factors affecting stroke occurrence and outcome4,5.

The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) was first to determine the impact of non-optimal temperature on stroke in 20191. Evidence have highlighted that stroke is particularly influenced by seasonal variability, notably with a predominance of peaks during winter6,7. Additionally, the season onset has been linked with severity and outcomes of ischemic stroke, and strokes occurring in winter are often more severe and have poorer outcomes compared to those in summer8,9.

However, existing studies largely focused on macro-level stroke incidence, mortality and prognostic assessments, with limited exploration into the effects on anatomical distribution of infarct lesions and the detailed implications of seasonal variability. It is well-established that the different territories involvement of ischemic stroke is linked with distinct clinical manifestations and functional outcome10,11. For instance, posterior circulation strokes are more likely to have a poor outcome compared to anterior circulation strokes12. Moreover, multiple infarctions are linked to more severe clinical manifestations, functional outcomes and the increased risk of complications, such as deep venous thrombosis and myocardial infarction13.

Therefore, this study aimed to explore the potential association of onset season with the lesion distribution of acute cerebral infarction, in order to provide deeper insights into the effects of seasonal variability on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and help to establishing meteorological risk warning strategies for AIS.

Methods

Study population

The study population was patients admitted to the Department of Neurology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University due to AIS (ICD code I63) between January 2018 and December 2022 (n = 3199). The inclusion criteria in this study were as follows: (1) Age > 18 years; (2) Hospitalization within 24 h from symptom onset; (3) Patients underwent MRI imaging examination within 72 h of onset; (4) Diagnosed with Acute Ischemic Stroke (ICD code I63). The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) No MRI images (n = 987); (2) Stroke of other determined cause and undetermined cause (n = 465); (3) Clinical information was incomplete (n = 259). The comparison of demographic variables between the enrolled and excluded patients are shown in the Supplement Data-Table S1. Finally, a total of 1488 patients were analyzed in our study. The study flow chart is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Flowchart of study enrollment.

Data collection

We collected demographic and clinical data including age, sex, medical history (hypertension, diabetes, stroke, hyperlipidaemia, coronary heart disease (CHD), atrial fibrillation (AF), smoking status and alcohol consumption), onset time, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and certain laboratory findings which were evaluated within 24 h of admission. Data collection was obtained by reviewing the medical records of the stroke admission.

According to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification system14, AIS was classified into the following 5 categories: (1) large artery atherosclerosis (LAA); (2) small-artery occlusion (SAO); (3) cardioembolism (CE); (4) stroke of other determined cause; and (5) stroke of undetermined cause. The diagnosis of stroke subtypes was determined by experienced clinical doctors based on clinical features, such as brain imaging (CT/MRI), vascular imaging (MRA/Transcranial Doppler/carotid artery ultrasound), echocardiography, and laboratory assessments. In this study, stroke of other determined cause and undetermined cause were excluded. The NIHSS was used to assess the neurological function, with stroke severity classified into four levels: minor (NIHSS ≤ 5), mild (NIHSS 6–10), moderate (NIHSS 11–15), and severe (NIHSS ≥ 16)15. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the season of stroke onset: spring (March–May), summer (June–August), autumn (September–November), and winter (December-February).

Ethical considerations were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University. Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Evaluation of lesion distribution on MRI

In this study, all patients underwent MRI imaging examination within 72 h of onset. The diagnosis of AIS was based on established criteria16. The lesions of acute cerebral infarctions were categorized as anterior circulation infarction (ACI), posterior circulation infarction (PCI), or anterior and posterior double circulation infarction (DCI) based on involved vascular territories. According to established criteria17,18,19,20, the vascular territories in the anterior circulation included the anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior choroidal artery, and border zone. In the posterior circulation, the vascular territories are the superior posterior cerebral artery (PCA), basilar artery (BA), superior cerebellar artery (SCA), anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA), and the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). Acute cerebral infarctions were also classified as unilateral or bilateral based on the location of the lesion. The unilateral (left/right) cerebral infarction is defined as new infarction only on one side of the midline structure of the brain, and the bilateral cerebral infarction is defined as the presence of intracranial infarction on both sides of the midline structure18,19. Single cerebral infarction refers to a single continuous lesion within the same blood supply range. Multiple cerebral infarctions are defined as ≥ 2 lesions located in one or more major arterial territories on DWI that was separated at the scanning level21.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were conducted using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Statistics V27.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., released 2020, Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were described with mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were compared using t-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA) for normally distributed data and Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal-Walli’s test for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. The Bonferroni adjustment was performed to assess the statistical significance of the intergroup differences. Logistic regression was applied for calculating the associations between season and lesions distribution of acute cerebral infarction. The results were reported as odds ratio (OR) values and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analysis was performed in different stroke subtypes. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and P < 0.05, indicated statistical significance.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics of study populations

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study populations are shown in Table 1. Of the 1448 AIS patients enrolled in the study, the mean age was 70.7 ± 11.6 years old and 913 (61.4%) were male. According to the onset season, 387 (26.0%) AIS occurred in spring, 425 (28.6%) in summer, 331 (22.2%) in autumn and 345 (23.2%) in winter. In all patients, 604 (40.6%) patients were classified as LAA subtype, 308 (20.7%) as CE and 576 (38.7%) as SAO subtype. The incidence of LAA stroke was higher in winter, and CE or SAO stroke was higher in summer. Regarding the medical history, CHD (p < 0.001) and hyperlipemia (p < 0.001) showed significant seasonal differences. Clinical characteristics on admission showed a trend towards higher NIHSS in spring and winter as compared with summer. The severity showed significant seasonal variability (p < 0.001). Results of laboratory tests on admission showed that total cholesterol (p = 0.021) and fibrinogen (p = 0.018) level were significantly higher during spring and winter. No significant seasonal differences were registered for SBP and DBP on admission. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with different stroke subtypes are shown in the Supplement Data-Table S2.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of study populations.

Lesion distribution of AIS in different seasons

The results of lesion distribution of acute ischemic stroke in different seasons are shown in Table 2. Among all the cases, ACI occurred in 678 (45.6%) patients, PCI occurred in 405 (27.2%), and DCI in 405 (27.2%), respectively. There are 719 (48.3%) patients diagnosed with single infarction, and 769 (51.7%) patients diagnosed with multiple infarctions. 1189 (79.9%) patients have unilateral lesions, and 299 (20.1%) have bilateral lesions. There are significant seasonal differences in the distribution of lesions on DWI. The incidence of ACI was lower in winter than that in summer (p < 0.05). The incidence of PCI or DCI showed a trend towards higher in winter, but no significant differences. Moreover, multiple infarctions or bilateral infarctions was more likely to occur in winter compared with summer (all p < 0.05).

Table 2 Lesion distribution of acute ischemic stroke in different seasons

Lesion distribution of AIS in various seasons with different stroke subtypes

Subgroup analysis found significant seasonal differences in the distribution of lesions of LAA and SAO stroke subtypes, but not in CE subtype (Table 3). In LAA stroke subtype, there are significant seasonal differences in the number of lesions (p = 0.025) and location of infarctions (unilateral/ bilateral lesions, p = 0.038). Compared with summer, multiple infarctions and bilateral infarctions are more common in spring and winter (all p < 0.05). No significant seasonal variations in the territory of infarctions. Among ASO stroke patients, DCI only have 2 (0.4%) cases, and more than 80% of patients are single (89.2%) or unilateral (88.4%) infarctions. There are significant seasonal differences in the distribution of lesions in SAO stroke subtype. The incidence of ACI can be seen lower but PCI higher in winter. Furthermore, the incidence of multiple infarctions and bilateral infarctions are higher in winter (all p < 0.05).

Table 3 Lesion distribution of acute ischemic stroke in various seasons by stroke subtypes.

Logistic regression analysis for season and lesion distribution of AIS

After adjusting for age, sex, stroke and other confounding factors, multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the winter group had 2.15 times (95% CI:1.44–3.21) risk of multiple infarctions, 1.54 times (95% CI:1.05–2.26) of bilateral infarctions and 2.69 times (95% CI:1.80–4.02) of DCI compared with summer group, respectively (Table 4).

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis of the association between season and lesion distribution of acute ischemic stroke.

Subgroup analysis showed that the association of season with infarct distribution differed among 3 stroke subtypes. As shown in Fig. 2, multivariate logistic regression revealed that the risk of multiple infarctions in SAO stroke subtype increased to 10.98 times in winter (95% CI 4.40–27.36, p < 0.01) compared with summer group. No significant associations of season with multiple infarctions in LAA and CE stroke subtypes. Figure 3 shows the association of season with bilateral infarctions in 3 stroke subtypes. Among LAA stroke subtype, compared with summer, the risk of bilateral cerebral infarctions increased to 2.73 times in spring (95% CI 1.34–5.56, p < 0.05), 2.88 times in autumn (95% CI 1.42–5.86, p < 0.01) and 2.51 times in winter (95% CI 1.24–5.08, p < 0.01), respectively. And multivariate logistic regression indicated that winter (95% CI 3.15–14.34, p < 0.01) is significantly associated with bilateral cerebral infarctions in SAO stroke patients. Significant associations of season with bilateral infarctions were not revealed in CE stroke subtypes. Compared with summer, risk of DCI in LAA stroke subtype increased to 1.57 times in winter (95%CI 1.00–2.49, p < 0.05). No significant associations of season with DCI in CE stroke subtype. The SAO stroke subtype was not analyzed owning to the small number of DCI (Fig. 4).

Figure 2
figure 2

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between season and multiple cerebral infarctions. LAA large-artery atherosclerosis, CE cardioembolism, SAO small-artery occlusion. The ORs were calculated using logistic regression model after adjusting sex, age, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, CHD, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipemia, smoking, drinking. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Figure 3
figure 3

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association of season with bilateral cerebral infarctions. Abbreviations: LAA large-artery atherosclerosis, CE cardioembolism, SAO small-artery occlusion. The ORs were calculated using logistic regression model after adjusting sex, age, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, CHD, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipemia, smoking, drinking. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Figure 4
figure 4

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association of season with double circulation cerebral infarctions Abbreviations: LAA, large-artery atherosclerosis; CE, cardioembolism; DCI, double circulation cerebral infarcts. The ORs were calculated using logistic regression model after adjusting sex, age, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, CHD, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipemia, smoking, drinking. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Discussion

In this study, our findings have demonstrated significant seasonal variability in distribution of infarctions lesions in AIS patients, particularly in LAA and SAO stroke subtypes. Specifically, there was an increased risk of multiple or bilateral infarcts in SAO stroke patients and a higher risk of anterior and posterior DCI in LAA stroke patients during winter. However, it’s intriguing to note that in cardioembolic stroke, the distribution of infarction lesions was not shown significant seasonal variation.

Previous research has established a correlation between seasonal factors and an increased incidence and mortality of stroke, particularly during colder winter, attributing this trend to lower ambient temperatures or greater amplitude of temperatures5,22. Lower temperatures may lead to elevating blood pressure, activating platelets and increasing blood viscosity, which potentially impact vascular function and increase the risk of stroke23. Furthermore, the season of onset has been associated with the severity and outcomes of ischemic stroke, with cases occurring in winter generally presenting more severe symptoms and poorer outcomes compared to those in summer8,9. More importantly, the location of cerebral infarction plays a crucial role in determining clinical presentation, comorbidities and outcome24. Studies showed that complications were more frequent in patients with multiple cerebral infarctions, which can adversely affect short-term clinical and functional outcome13. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the seasonal variability in distribution of infarctions lesions in AIS patients. The findings may contribute to shedding light on the influence of season on stroke occurrence and prognosis.

The present study revealed that patients with LAA stroke had higher risk of bilateral or DCI infarctions during winter compared to summer. For LAA stroke patients, bilateral infarctions, especially those occurring in multiple circulations often pointed to a more proximal source of embolism, such as aortic arch arteriosclerosis25,26. The potential reasons for increased risk of bilateral or DCI infarctions during winter are as follows. Firstly, the cold-mediated plaque instability may be one of the important reasons. Evidence suggests that cold exposure via uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1)-dependent activates lipolysis, leading to elevated levels of blood cholesterol and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, especially very LDL (VLDL) and small LDL remnants, which promotes atherosclerotic plaque growth and instability27. Moreover, cold can enhance the instability of atherosclerotic plaques by activating endoplasmic reticulum stress, promoting cellular apoptosis, and mediating inflammation response leading to the rupture of vulnerable plaques28,29. Above all, the lower ambient temperatures during winter may cause aortic plaques rupture into several fragments, which could embolize different arterial segments of the cerebral circulation30. Secondly, patients with LAA stroke generally possess a higher burden of vascular risk factors, and the seasonal and temperature variability of these risk factors (e.g., blood pressure, blood glucose) may further contribute to the progression and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques31,32. Thirdly, cold spells were found to be significantly correlated with increased hematocrit and fibrinogen level, which may increase the tendency for blood clots to form during cold winter33,34. Certainly, the specific mechanism needs to be further confirmed by more in-depth basic experiments.

Our study indicated the increased risk of multifocal or bilateral infarctions in SAO stroke during winter. The leading cause of small-artery disease include arteriolosclerosis, microatheroma and lipohyalinosis35. Chronic hypertension is considered as the primary cause of these pathological events, but other diseases, such as aging, atherosclerosis, and diabetes can lead to brain microcirculation impairment 36. The exact mechanism leading to multiple ischemic lesions is currently unknown. But systemic factors like blood pressure regulation, hemorheological factors, endothelial dysfunction, and potentially stress might play a role 37. Studies proved that blood pressure exhibited significant seasonal variability with a winter peak, especially in the elderly population38,39, which could be attributed to lower ambient temperature. Additionally, the adverse effects of decreased temperature on small vessels, potentially involving temperature-dependent vascular constriction, altered hemodynamics, or metabolic dysregulation within microcirculation40,41. Consequently, the lower temperature may cause diffuse damage to small vessels and increase the risk of multiple lesions in winter37. So, additional preventive measures for patients with small-vessel occlusion might be prudent during winter, such as maintaining ambient warmth, adequate body insulation, and potentially vascular-protective medical interventions.

In this study, there is no significant seasonal variability in the distribution of lesions in CE stroke patients. Studies confirmed that multiple infarctions and involves multiple vascular territories (combined anterior and posterior) mostly point to a cardiac origin of the stroke42, which is consistent with our findings. This infarction pattern may be related to the underlying mechanisms of cardioembolic strokes. Cardioembolic stroke is typically caused by embolism formation due to heart diseases which include arrhythmia, valvulopathy, and structural abnormalities (such as atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale)43. AF, as a disorder of heart rhythm, is considered as the most common risk factor of cardioembolic stroke. Evidence suggests that declining ambient temperature could increase the risk of AF episode onset44, which may contribute to the increased incidence of cardioembolic stroke in cold season45. However, there is still a lack of sufficient evidence on whether the increased risk of AF mediated by low temperatures affects the seasonal distribution of infarctions lesion in cardioembolic strokes. More studies are needed to explore the association between this increased risk of AF and seasonal differences in lesion distribution in the future.

Our study has several strengths. The study firstly investigated the seasonal variability in distribution of infarcts lesions in different stroke subtypes. Furthermore, the lesions distribution of AIS was confirmed by brain imaging ensuring accurate diagnosis and classification. Nevertheless, some limitations of our study should be acknowledged. First, the sample is from a single center and has small size, which may not reflect the overall seasonal variation trend of AIS across different populations and climates around the world. Thus, caution is advised in generalizing our findings globally. Second, aortic arch atherosclerosis may be an overlooked cause of stroke because transesophageal echocardiography was not commonly performed for stroke patients in our clinical practice. This may lead to an underestimation of LAA stroke subtypes. Third, the exact location (intracranial vs extracranial) of atherosclerotic lesions was not systematically assessed in this study, which will be addressed in our future research. Additionally, the retrospective design of our study precludes the determination of causality, warranting prospective, multi-center studies to further validate the observed impacts of seasonal variability on lesion distribution in different stroke subtypes.

In conclusion, our study suggested a significant association between onset season and the distribution of infarcts lesions in AIS patients. During winter, there is a significantly increased risk of multiple or bilateral or dual circulation cerebral infarction during winter, particularly in LAA and SAO stroke subtypes. Our findings provide novel insights into the effects of seasonal variability on various stroke subtypes, which may conduce to establishing new preventive strategies and meteorological risk warning system for different stroke subtypes.