Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are one of the most common determinants and potential biomarkers of human disease pathogenesis. SNPs could alter amino acid residues, leading to the loss of structural and functional integrity of the encoded protein. In humans, members of the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) family play a vital role in cell proliferation and have a significant impact on tumorigenesis. Among the MCM members, the molecular mechanism of how missense SNPs of minichromosome maintenance complex component 6 (MCM6) contribute to DNA replication and tumor pathogenesis is underexplored and needs to be elucidated. Hence, a series of sequence and structure-based computational tools were utilized to determine how mutations affect the corresponding MCM6 protein. From the dbSNP database, among 15,009 SNPs in the MCM6 gene, 642 missense SNPs (4.28%), 291 synonymous SNPs (1.94%), and 12,500 intron SNPs (83.28%) were observed. Out of the 642 missense SNPs, 33 were found to be deleterious during the SIFT analysis. Among these, 11 missense SNPs (I123S, R207C, R222C, L449F, V456M, D463G, H556Y, R602H, R633W, R658C, and P815T) were found as deleterious, probably damaging, affective and disease-associated. Then, I123S, R207C, R222C, V456M, D463G, R602H, R633W, and R658C missense SNPs were found to be highly harmful. Six missense SNPs (I123S, R207C, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W) had the potential to destabilize the corresponding protein as predicted by DynaMut2. Interestingly, five high-risk mutations (I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W) were distributed in two domains (PF00493 and PF14551). During molecular dynamics simulations analysis, consistent fluctuation in RMSD and RMSF values, high Rg and hydrogen bonds in mutant proteins compared to wild-type revealed that these mutations might alter the protein structure and stability of the corresponding protein. Hence, the results from the analyses guide the exploration of the mechanism by which these missense SNPs of the MCM6 gene alter the structural integrity and functional properties of the protein, which could guide the identification of ways to minimize the harmful effects of these mutations in humans.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most widespread and reliable kind of genetic variation that is associated with disease development and guide the exploration of the mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. The human genome contains numerous genetic code variations, with SNPs being the most abundant, accounting for nearly 1% of the entire human genome1. These SNP-mediated variations alter the genomic sequence by changing the intergenic region (regions between genes), coding region of genes (exons), and non-coding region of genes (introns)2. SNPs in the coding region are divided into two types, synonymous and non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs), where protein sequences are altered by the nsSNPs3. Synonymous mutations cause no change in the corresponding protein due to the degenerative alternative code of the amino acids. Although having a potential impact on the splicing process, these synonymous SNPs (sSNPs) are considered functionally inactive and have negligible impact on evolutionary processes4. Indeed, among the nsSNPs, missense SNPs mainly change the structure, stability, and functions of the corresponding protein5. Since intronic regions do not participate in translation, the SNPs in the region have the least contribution to disease pathogenesis. Due to representing approximately half of the human non-coding genome, introns contribute greatly to genome evolution6.
Transcription factors play a vital role in the pathogenesis of human diseases. Among the transcription factors in the human genome, members of the minichromosome maintenance complex (MCM) gene family play a vital role in cell proliferation and have a potential impact on tumorigenesis7. The MCM family includes MCM2, MCM3, MCM4, MCM5, MCM6 and MCM7 protein complexes. The MCM2 gene plays a vital role in DNA replication and overexpression is associated with multiple types of cancers8. The MCM3 gene is essential for the initiation of DNA replication and is involved in ensuring the precise initiation of DNA replication once per cell cycle9. The MCM4 gene is mainly enriched in the cell cycle and cell division and is also significantly associated with tumor size and, lymph node metastasis10. The MCM5 gene is associated with malignant status and poor prognosis in cervical adenocarcinoma patients, modulates cervical adenocarcinoma cells proliferation, inhibits the cell cycle and promotes colorectal cancer cells in vitro11,12. The MCM6 gene is located at 2q2113, spans 3,624 bp and encodes 821 amino acids with a molecular weight of 93.1 kDa14. It plays a significant role in the regulation of DNA replication by forming a hetero-hexameric complex with other MCM members15. In addition, the MCM6 gene is involved in tumor pathogenesis16 and promotes the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)14. It also plays a vital role in cell proliferation, migration, invasion and the immune response in many cancer types, such as breast cancer17,18, HCC16, glioma19, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)20 and endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma21. The MCM7 gene plays a significant role in eukaryotic DNA replication, and its overexpression is related to cellular proliferation and responsible for various cancers22.
SNPs are the widespread genetic variation that includes missense SNPs, which are associated with and act as biomarkers of disease pathogenesis by affecting gene function23. Deleterious missense SNPs that have the potential to destabilize proteins, significantly affects protein structure upon a single amino acid substitution, disease-association, be highly conserved could be a potential biomarker for specific diseases24. The missense SNPs in the MCM6 gene could disrupt the binding ability of the respective proteins. Non-synonymous variants of MCM6 gene are associated with lactase persistence in Africans and Europeans25. It also has a homozygous mutation in ELMO3 gene, which is associated with Keratoconus26. The continuous incursion of new variants in different genes can easily be tracked using modern molecular biology techniques. However, the molecular mechanisms by which MCM6 variants contribute to disease pathogenesis in humans are yet to be discovered. Considering the above-mentioned facts, we performed extensive screening for the most damaging missense SNPs in MCM6 gene to identify the pathogenic SNPs. The MCM6 gene was extracted from the NCBI database and screened for high-risk pathogenicity using multiple bioinformatics tools with the highest precision level27,28,29. In addition, the mechanism by which pathogenic missense SNPs alter protein structure and function was also explored. Then, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was also conducted to check the stability of the missense SNPs30.
Materials and methods
The schematic diagram of the in-silico analyses conducted in the study is presented in Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the pipeline for in silico analysis of missense SNPs in the MCM6 gene.
Protein sequence and missense SNPs retrieval
National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and NCBI dbSNP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/) databases were used to collect the protein sequence (FASTA format) and SNPs of MCM6 gene respectively. The missense SNPs were further analyzed using different software, as this type of mutation generates protein variants and induces crucial structural alterations that could decrease binding affinity and impair the protein function31.
Deleterious missense SNPs prediction using SIFT
Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT)32 (https://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg/) is a bioinformatic web server used to detect deleterious missense SNPs from tolerated SNPs. This is a homology-based sequence analysis that calculates the normalized probabilities for all possible substitutions from the alignment. In SIFT prediction, missense SNPs having score of > 0.05 regarded as ‘tolerated’ and less than or equal of that regarded as deleterious.
Damaging missense SNPs prediction using PolyPhen-2
Polymorphism Phenotypingv2 (PolyPhen-2)33 web server (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) is used to predict the possible impact of missense SNPs on protein structure and function. The analysis is based on the sequence, structure and phylogenetic relationships. PolyPhen-2 categorizes SNPs into three categories, (1) benign (0.00–0.45) (2) possibly damaging (0.45–0.95), and (3) probably damaging (0.95–1). The input FASTA sequence of the protein with the position of interest and the new residue were submitted to PolyPhen-2 to predict the functional impact of mutations.
Functional effect prediction of missense SNPs using SNAP
Screening for non-acceptable polymorphisms (SNAP)34 (http://www.rostlab.org/services/SNAP) is a bioinformatics web server used to evaluate the functional effects of a single amino acid substitution in proteins using the neural network method. It predicts the changes that occur due to the missense SNPs on the secondary structure and compares the solvent accessibility of the native and mutated proteins to distinguish them into effect or neutral. The FASTA sequence of the native MCM6 protein was used as the input.
Disease association prediction of missense SNPs
PhD-SNP
The predictor of human deleterious single nucleotide polymorphism (PhD-SNP)35 (http://snps.biofold.org/phd-snp/phd-snp.html) is a web server. It is based on Support Vector Machine (SVM) that is optimized to predict disease-related or neutral variants. FASTA sequences of the corresponding proteins and residue changes were submitted as inputs in the PhD-SNP server.
PANTHER
The protein analysis through evolutionary relationship (PANTHER)36 (https://pantherdb.org/) based web server was performed to evaluate the effect of the specific amino acid substitution in the biological function of the corresponding protein in the organism. Based on Hidden Markov Models (HMM), this server estimates the probability of how SNPs variants affect the structure of proteins based on their evolutionary origin.
SNPs&GO
The SNPs&GO37 server (http://snps-and-go.biocomp.unibo.it/snps-andgo/) also utilizes an SVM-based method that precisely predicts if the variants are disease-associated or not. This method calculates the score and evaluates the association of each mutated variant with human diseases. If the score of missense SNPs was ≥ 0.5, it was considered to be involved in the disease, while a score of < 0.5 was considered to have a neutral effect.
Conservation analysis
The ConSurf38 (http://consurf.tau.ac.il/) web server detected a highly conserved functional network of the query protein. This tool creates a phylogenetic tree between homologous sequences to calculate the evolutionary conservation of the amino acids in a protein molecule.
Stability and flexibility prediction of missense SNPs on MCM6 protein
I-Mutant2.0
The I-Mutant2.039 web server (https://folding.biofold.org/cgi-bin/i-mutant2.0.cgi) was used to estimate the potential effects of missense SNPs on the structural reliability of the protein and free energy change DDG (Delta Delta G). This is an SVM-based prediction of changes in protein stability upon mutations in the corresponding protein. Here, stability increases when DDG is > 0 kcal/mol and decreases when DDG is < 0 kcal/mol.
MUpro
The MUpro40 server (http://mupro.proteomics.ics.uci.edu/) was used to predict the energy change and how mutations affect protein stability using both SVM and Neural Networks methods. A decrease in protein stability was predicted if the confidence score was < 0 while an increase in protein stability was predicted for a score of > 0.
MEDUSA
MEDUSA41 (https://www.dsimb.inserm.fr/MEDUSA/) web server was used to predict the flexibility of the corresponding protein. This provides a clear visualization of the prediction results. It predicts two, three and five classes of flexibility by using amino acid sequences. Following the evolutionary origin and physicochemical properties, the server categorized the flexibility class of each amino acid in the spatial arrangement of the protein. The amino acid sequence was put onto the server in FASTA format to obtain the results.
Protein three-dimensional modeling
The Protein Homology/analogy Recognition Engine V 2.0 (Phyre2)42 web server (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2) was used to generate the three-dimensional (3D) structure of representative MCM6 and other mutant proteins. The FASTA sequences of the wild-type (WT) and other MCM6 mutant proteins were used to generate 3D structures43. The PyMOL44 software was used to visualize the homology models.
Prediction of harmful mutations using MutPred2
MutPred245 (http://mutpred2.mutdb.org/) is a web server that explains the reasons for diseases at the molecular level based on amino acid submissions. It predicts the molecular cause of a disease using a general probability score based on the gain/loss of 14 different structural and functional properties. This score represents the probability that an amino acid substitution is associated with a disease, and the top 5 property scores are provided, where p represents the p-value that certain structural and functional properties are impacted.
Prediction of structural effects of MCM6 mutants using Project Hope server
Project Hope46 server (http://www.cmbi.ru.nl/hope/) was used to calculate the structural and functional effects of point mutations. This investigation provides 3D structural visualization of mutated proteins and provides the results using the UniProt and DAS prediction servers. Here, the protein sequence, wild-type, and new amino acids were used as inputs and the output resulted in text, graphics, and animation format.
Structure-based analysis of mutations using DynaMut2
DynaMut247 (https://biosig.lab.uq.edu.au/dynamut2/) was used to evaluate the mutations in protein stability and dynamics using the normal mode analysis (NMA) method. The predicted Gibbs free energy (ΔΔG) values of mutants less than zero (0) were classified as destabilizing, whereas those greater than 0 were classified as stabilizing.
Visualization of selected mutations using mutation3D server
The mutation3D48 server (http://mutation3d.org/) is a functional prediction and visualization tool for studying the spatial arrangement of amino acid substitutions (AAS) in protein models and structures. This server was used to identify the clusters of amino acid substitutions using the 3D clustering method. It is also useful for clustering other kinds of mutational data, or simply as a tool to quickly assess the relative locations of amino acids in proteins. Additionally, it can be employed to cluster other types of mutational data or as a tool to quickly assess the relative locations of amino acids in proteins.
Molecular dynamics simulations analysis
To evaluate the structural stability of the mutant protein, a 50 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was performed using the "Desmond v6.3 Program" in Schrodinger 2020-3 under the Linux framework49. The simulation was performed following the three-site transferrable intermolecular potential (TIP3P) water model50. An orthorhombic box shape with a 10 Å distance from the center was used to maintain a specific volume, and Na+ and Cl- were added to neutralize the whole system with a salt concentration of 0.15 M. An OPLS3e force field was applied51. The protein structure system was further minimized using a natural time and pressure (NPT) ensemble at a constant pressure of 1,01,325 Pascal’s and a temperature of 300 K. To evaluate the stability and dynamic characteristics of the protein, RMSD (root means square deviation), RMSF (root means square fluctuation), Rg (radius of gyration), and hydrogen bonds were analyzed.
Gene–gene and protein–protein interaction networks
GeneMANIA
Gene–gene interaction network was used to understand the disease phenomenon. The GeneMANIA52 tool (http://www.genemania.org) predicts the biological function of a single gene or gene set and can help identify new genes in a pathway or complex. The human MCM6 protein sequence was used as input in GeneMANIA. The analyzed results were based on genetic interactions, pathways, co-expression, co-localization, and shared protein domain similarity.
STRING
Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING)53 tool (https://string-db.org/) was used to identify the protein–protein interaction (PPI) of the MCM6 protein with other proteins in the human genome. The PPI network showed correlations between proteins. The PPI network and functional analysis indicated that protein sets were enriched in the target network of the MCM6 protein.
Results
Protein sequence and missense SNPs retrieval
The nsSNPs and sequence of the human MCM6 gene were retrieved from the NCBI database. A total of 15,009 SNPs were identified for the MCM6 gene. The automated computation resulted in 642 missense SNPs (4.28%), 291 synonymous SNPs (1.94%), and 12,500 intron SNPs (83.28%). Then, missense SNPs were further analyzed to identify the most deleterious variants.
Deleterious missense SNPs prediction using SIFT
Among 642 missense SNPs, 33 SNPs were predicted to be deleterious with a tolerance index of ≤ 0.05 (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1).
Damaging missense SNPs prediction using PolyPhen-2
Based on PolyPhen-2 analysis, 27 and 23 missense SNPs were observed as probably damaging with high confidence in HumDiv and HumVar analyses respectively. Subsequently, 23 were overlapped in both HumDiv and HumVar analyses and were considered for downstream experiments (Table 1).
Functional effect prediction of missense SNPs using SNAP
Analysis of the 23 missense SNPs using SNAP program revealed that all inputted missense SNPs showed a significant effect. However, none of these SNPs was found to be neutral in this analysis (Table 1).
Disease association prediction of missense SNPs
A total of 12, 13 and 17 SNPs were found to be associated with diseases when analyzed using the SNPs&GO, PhD-SNP, and PANTHER programs, respectively. Following all upstream analyses, 11 missense SNPs (I123S, R207C, R222C, L449F, V456M, D463G, H556Y, R602H, R633W, R658C, and P815T) were common and were observed as deleterious, probably damaging, affective and disease-associated (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S2).
Conservation analysis
Specific positions of amino acids are crucial for the correct function of a protein. The ConSurf tool was used to determine the conservation score of the MCM6 protein. This program identified highly conserved structural and functional amino acid regions essential for biological functions. The analysis revealed that residues R222C, L449F, D463G, H556Y, R602H and P815T with a conservation score of 9, R207C, V456M, and R633W with a conservation score of 8, and I123S and R658C with a conservation score of 5 had potential biological functions. Interestingly, among those missense SNPs, R222C, R222C, D463G, R602H, and R633W were functional and the rest were buried (Fig. 2).
Analysis of evolutionary conserved amino acids residues of MCM6 by ConSurf. Color coding bar showing conservation score.
Stability and flexibility prediction of missense SNPs on MCM6 protein
I-Mutant2.0 and MUpro servers were used to estimate the stability of 11 mutant proteins based on the free energy change value (Delta Delta G, DDG), and the confidence score respectively. Among these, 8 SNPs (I123S, R207C, R222C, V456M, D463G, R602H, R633W, and R658C) guided proteins were found to be the most unstable considering DDG and confidence score (Table 2).
The MEDUSA web server predicted and visualized the flexibility of corresponding proteins with dynamic properties. Based on the three-class flexibility prediction of MCM6 protein by MEDUSA (0 = rigid, 2 = flexible), the positions of all 8 SNPs were rigid, except D463G and R658C which were flexible. The amino acid sequence positions R207C and V456M had a confidence score > 0.5, while the position I123S had the confidence score of 0.5–0.6 and positions R222C, D463G, R602H, R633W and R658C had a confidence score < 0.5 (Fig. 3A).
(A) Flexibility prediction of missense SNPs on MCM6 protein, (B) Three-dimensional modeling of wild type MCM6 protein and other 8 mutants. The protein chains are coloured as blue at the N-terminus and red at the C-terminus. The secondary structures in the model are highlighted in green (for α-helices) and yellow (for β-strands).
Protein three-dimensional modeling
The Phyre2 homology-based modeling tool provided the 3D structure of the MCM6 WT and 8 mutant MCM6 proteins (Fig. 3B)54. Both WT and mutant proteins showed 100% confidence. The WT and mutant proteins showed 83% coverage of the corresponding proteins. The percentage of the alpha-helix in the MCM6 WT was 29%, whereas it varied from 29 to 31% in mutant proteins. Similarly, the beta strand in the MCM6 WT was 18%, whereas in the mutant protein it varied from 17 to 18%. Similarly, the disorder percentage varied from 22 to 24% (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Table S3).
Prediction of harmful mutations by MutPred2
The MutPred2 tool provides the structural and functional effects of a specific protein based on its physiochemical properties. The eight potentially destabilized missense SNPs caused significant variations in the structural and functional properties of the corresponding MCM6 mutated proteins. Interestingly, these potential SNPs significantly promoted disease pathogenesis by altering various aspects of the protein, including helices and interfaces, DNA binding sites, allosteric sites, catalytic sites, pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, methylation, and transmembrane proteins. Finally, all 8 missense SNPs (I123S, R207C, R222C, V456M, D463G, R602H, R633W, and R658C) resulted in highly harmful mutated proteins, as indicated by the MutPred2 general score (Table 3).
Prediction of structural effects of MCM6 mutants using Project Hope server
The Project HOPE server showed how mutation affects the structural variation of a protein in terms of size, charge, hydrophobicity, and spatial structure compared to the wild type. Among the 8 predicted mutants, the I123S, R207C, R222C, D463G, R602H, and R658C mutant residues were smaller than the wild residues, which caused an empty space in the core of the wild protein and a loss of hydrophobic interactions. However, the V456M and R633W mutants were found to be larger in size than the wild residues, resulting in their localization on the surface of the wild protein. Therefore, mutations of residues can interrupt the inter/intra-molecular interactions of the protein (Table 4).
Structure-based analysis of mutations using DynaMut2
The DynaMut2 server was used for mutation verification and its related effects on the spike protein structure and dynamics. Out of eight mutations, six (I123S, R207C, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W) mutations were found to be responsible for destabilizing the protein, whereas the remaining mutants were found to stabilize the protein structure (Table 5).
Visualization of selected mutations using mutation3D server
The mutation3D server showed the presence of harmful substitutions in the MCM6 protein (encoded by the MCM6 gene), and the DNA replication licensing factor (Fig. 4). Two domains of the MCM6 protein, consisting of 821 amino acids were identified, MCM (PF00493) and MCM_N (PF14551). Among the six mutations, five (I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W) were located in the domain region and were thus considered high-risk mutations for the MCM6 protein (Fig. 4).
3D structure of MCM6 protein, generated by mutation 3D server, and representation of selected mutations on protein’s domains. Mutation3D48 server was used to generate the figure (http://mutation3d.org/).
Molecular dynamics simulations analysis
RMSD
The RMSD of Cα atoms was subtracted for these wild-type and five mutant proteins to measure the protein structure stability throughout the 50 ns simulation. The wild protein and five selected missense SNPs proteins I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W showed average fluctuations of 9.15 Å, 7.83 Å, 7.96 Å, 7.81 Å, 8.34 Å and 8.76 Å, respectively (Fig. 5A). This indicated that all the mutant proteins deviated similarly to the wild-type proteins. In the above proteins, the highest RMSD deviations were observed as 10.847 Å, 10.15 Å, 10.04 Å, 9.75 Å, 10.07 Å, and 10.95 Å and the lowest in the same were 2.147 Å, 2.027 Å, 1.813 Å, 2.254 Å, 1.915 Å and 1.844 Å respectively (Fig. 5A). Hence, mutated proteins had structural instability compared to the wild-type proteins.
Analysis of RMSD, RMSF, Rg, and H bonds of native and five mutants of MCM6 over 50 ns simulation. (A) RMSD values of Cα atoms of native and mutant structures. (B) RMSF values of Cα atoms of native and mutant structures. (C) Calculation of Rg, which is represented as a time-dependent change during the simulation. (D) Calculation of H-bonds represented as a time-depend. The color scheme is as follows: native (blue), I123S mutant (red), V456M mutant (green), D463G mutant (violet), R602H mutant (yellow), and R633W mutant (orange). A 50 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was performed using the "Desmond v6.3 Program" in Schrodinger 2020-3 under the Linux framework49. The simulation was performed following the three-site transferrable intermolecular potential (TIP3P) water model50. An orthorhombic box shape with a 10 Å distance from the center was used to maintain a specific volume, and Na+ and Cl- were added to neutralize the whole system with a salt concentration of 0.15 M. An OPLS3e force field was applied51.
RMSF
To investigate the variations in structural flexibility of specific amino acids in the proteins, the RMSF values were assessed (Fig. 5B). Wild-type and five mutated proteins I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W had the highest peak fluctuations positioned at GLY_275, TYR_276, GLU_277, ASN_684, ASN_700, and GLU_701; PRO_221, GLY_275, ALA_487, and GLU_561; CYS_540, GLU_560, and SER_798; ILE_104, GLY_218, ARG_316, GLY_383, GLU_589, ASN_684, and SER_762; ASP_41, SER_258, ARG_316, ARG_512, VAL_609, and ASN_697; and GLY_10, ASP_160, VAL_184, GLU_277, GLY_383, TYR_546, VAL_609, GLY_698, GLU_740, ASP_761, GLU_800, and ASP_821; amino acids respectively. The corresponding average fluctuations of the wild and mutated proteins were 2.69 Å, 2.74 Å, 2.61 Å, 3.40 Å, 2.75 Å and 2.95 Å. The highest and lowest fluctuation values of wild type and I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W proteins were calculated as 16.50 Å, 20.46 Å, 14.03 Å, 13.63 Å, 13.95 Å, 19.72 Å, and 0.94 Å, 1.00 Å, 0.75 Å, 0.95 Å, 0.80 Å, 0.88 Å respectively.
Radius of gyration (Rg)
The Rg quantifies the distribution of atoms around a protein axis, and serves as a crucial metric for forecasting macromolecular structural behavior and evaluating alterations in protein compactness. Here, the complex stability of the wild type and mutated proteins was assessed by analyzing their Rg values throughout a 50 ns simulation period. The Rg value of wild protein and five selected missense SNPs I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W ranges from 35.946 to 42.364 Å, 35.617–39.260 Å, 35.898–42.184 Å, 36.455–39.407 Å, 35.740–39.254 Å and 35.828–43.499 Å, respectively (Fig. 5C). The average fluctuations of these SNPs were 37.235 Å, 36.824 Å, 37.280 Å, 37.889 Å, 36.836 Å and 38.037 Å, respectively. Unstable mutated protein structures in 50 ns simulations with a lower fluctuation range suggested that the binding affinity of the selected ligand did not significantly alter the active site of the corresponding protein.
Hydrogen bonds
Hydrogen bonds are pivotal for ensuring the binding stability of the corresponding protein. The number of hydrogen bonds can define the protein characteristics, structural stability and ability to bind with other molecules. Therefore, the number of hydrogen bonds in the wild protein and five mutated proteins (I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W) (Fig. 5D). All the proteins formed multiple hydrogen bonds ranging from 670 to 790 in 50 ns simulation time. Higher specificity and less flexibility of hydrogen bonds in wild protein compared to the mutated protein might be due to the higher structural instability of the mutated protein compared to WT (Fig. 5D).
Gene–gene and protein–protein interaction networks
GeneMANIA
GeneMANIA constructed a composite gene–gene functional interaction network for the MCM6 gene (Fig. 5). The MCM6 gene was found to be associated with 20 other genes which play vital roles in various functions. Among these 20 genes, the most important were the MCM2, MCM4, CDC45, MCM7, and CDT1 genes (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table S4).
Gene–gene interaction network of MCM6 gene predicted by GeneMANIA. GeneMANIA52 tool was utilized to generate the image (http://www.genemania.org).
STRING
The STRING database was used to partially describe the functional relationships and interaction networks of MCM6 gene. The analysis revealed that MCM6 gene was associated with 10 other genes. A significant correlation was observed between the topological characteristics and biological function of corresponding genes. Among these genes, MCM2, MCM4, CDC45, MCM7, CDT1, MCM3, MCM5, GINS4, GINS2 and GINS3 genes showed the strongest interactions with the corresponding gene (Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table S5)55.
Interaction of MCM6 protein with other proteins analyzed by STRING tool.
Discussion
The MCM family proteins are highly conserved hexameric complexes of DNA-binding proteins. There are six subtypes of MCM proteins, namely, MCM2, MCM3, MCM4, MCM5, MCM6 and MCM756. Among these, the MCM6 protein is particularly important for cell proliferation and the regulation of DNA replication14. The MCM6 gene, which encodes the MCM6 protein is found in the human genome16. Mutations in the MCM6 gene can lead to lactose intolerance, lactose non-persistence and metabolically unhealthy obesity in children57,58. Several missense SNPs in the MCM6 gene have been reported in the dbSNP database. To better understand the mechanism by which these mutations affect the structural integrity of proteins and contribute to disease pathogenesis, a systematic deep bioinformatics analyses have been conducted to identify functionally important missense SNPs in the corresponding gene. We used in-silico structural and functional analyses to identify potential missense SNPs, as well as various computational approaches to predict the deleterious SNPs.
A total of 642 missense SNPs among 15,009 SNPs in the analyzed gene indicate how the significant number of SNPs could alter the protein structure of the MCM6 gene. A series of analyses of missense SNPs using SIFT, Polyphen-2, SNAP, PhD-SNP, PANTHER and SNPs&GO guides for precise screening of the most deleterious SNPs. Among the 33 deleterious SNPs identified by SIFT, 23 probably damaging SNPs revealed that all deleterious SNPs could not have potential for disease pathogenesis as they could alter protein function (Table 1). Variations in computing diseases associated with missense SNPs in SNPs&GO, PhD-SNP, and PANTHER might be due to using different algorithms in the mentioned programs. However, the consistent common 12 missense SNPs in all the analyzed programs might be due to their role in disease pathogenesis (Table 1). The eleven (I123S, R207C, R222C, L449F, V456M, D463G, H556Y, R602H, R633W, R658C, and P815T) which are deleterious, probably damaging, effective and disease associated missense SNPs in the MCM6 gene guide the identification the molecular mechanism by which these SNPs cause disease pathogenesis altering protein function (Table 1). Then, highly functional R222C, R222C, D463G, R602H and R633W SNPs in the conserved region guide elucidating the molecular mechanisms by which these SNPs significantly alter protein function over several generations (Fig. 2). Mutations in highly conserved regions are more destructive than in non-conserved region5.
Protein stability plays a critical role in maintaining the biological functions and activities of biomolecules. Pathogenic missense mutations lead to incorrect folding and decreased stability of the altered protein. The significant protein destabilization potential of eight missense SNPs (I123S, R207C, R222C, V456M, D463G, R602H, R633W, and R658C) in the MCM6 gene might be due to their significant role in protein bonding and folding. This destabilization might promote diseases pathogenesis. Six rigid SNPs (I123S, R207C, R222C, V456M, R602H, R633W) predicted by MEDUSA might reveal their potential to increase disease pathogenesis by increasing the rigidity of the mutant protein (Fig. 3A). Mutation-mediated overall flexibility decreases and rigidity increases might affect the binding affinity of the mutant proteins59. Amino acid substitution significantly alters the 3D structure and function of the corresponding protein60. Alpha helix and beta strands are the structural elements of a protein where the former one represents intramolecular hydrogen (H) bonding and the latter consists of beta sheets. Alpha helix and beta strand significantly differ in mutation tolerance61. Alpha helix has potential to accumulate more mutations due to the higher numbers of inter-residue contacts and mutations to residues in β-strands reduce the volume of the amino acid62. The 29% alpha-helix in the WT and 29–31% in the mutant, along with 22–24 disordered percentage reveals that the mutant proteins lacked a fixed ordered 3D structure (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Table S3). Mutations affect the helix–helix interactions and disordered regions of corresponding protein by changing their properties63. Hence, mutations at these positions might alter the structural and functional properties of the mutant protein.
MutPred2 mediated a significantly higher general score of > 0.75 in all 8 missense SNPs (I123S, R207C, R222C, V456M, D463G, R602H, R633W, and R658C) reveal that these mutations significantly alter the structural and functional properties of the corresponding proteins (Table 3). Since V456M and R633W mutants were larger and the rest were smaller than the WT, these mutations might significantly alter the functional properties of the proteins (Table 4). Mutation of the residue interrupts inter/intra-molecular interactions of the protein which influence the function, characteristics or reactivity of the mutant protein64. Therefore, mutations in the residues at the above-mentioned eight positions might alter the function, characteristics or reactivity of the WT protein. Significant destabilization potential in six mutations (I123S, R207C, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W) as analyzed by DynaMut2 might alter the structure of the mutant protein leading to loss of function (Table 5). The distribution of five (I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W) mutations in MCM (PF00493) and MCM_N (PF14551) domains might be due to the significant contribution of these mutations to the functional alteration of the protein and progression of disease pathogenesis (Fig. 4). Domains are functionally active sites in a protein structure and mutations at these sites may have a tremendous effect on their activity65. Hence, the corresponding proteins of these five mutations might have a harmful effect at supra-optimal level in the human genome. The molecular dynamics simulation evaluates how missense SNPs affect the stability, residual fluctuation, and compactness of the protein at different levels. This guide identifies novel mutations in the corresponding protein in an effective way. The protein structure is stabilized when the RMSD and RMSF values of a protein are within 1–3 Å66. The consistent fluctuation of the I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W mutant in RMSD suggests that these five mutations cause unstable structures of the corresponding protein (Fig. 5A). The RMSF evaluates the mean fluctuation of WT and mutant structures to determine the compactness of the protein. The higher fluctuation in mutants compared to WT was due to the structural instability of the corresponding protein (Fig. 5B). Compared to the WT, a higher Rg value represents the disassociation of the respective protein. However, the increased number of hydrogen bonds causes the structural unsteadiness67,68. Hence, consistent fluctuations in RMSD and RMSF values, high Rg and hydrogen bonds in mutant proteins compared to WT might guide exploring the mechanism by which these missense SNPs alter the structure and function of the native MCM6 protein. In the GeneMANIA mediated gene–gene functional interaction network, MCM6 significantly interacted with 20 others genes. Among these, MCM2, MCM4, CDC45 (Cell division cycle 45), MCM7, and CDT1 (Chromatin licensing and DNA replication factor 1) genes interacted more significantly than the other genes (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table S4). MCM2 regulates cell cycle and DNA replication-related pathways8, and while MCM4 acts as the replicative helicase and is required for DNA replication and genome stability69. CDC45 is essential for the establishment of an initiation complex at DNA origins70, MCM7 is responsible for markedly increased DNA synthesis, cell proliferation and an increased cell invasion in prostate cancer71, and CDT1 provides instructions for making a protein that is important in the copying of a cell's DNA before the cell divides72. Hence, missense SNPs in MCM6 might alter DNA replication and cell proliferation by interacting with other 20 genes73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84 and resulting in serious health hazards even cancer.
In STRING based protein–protein interaction, the MCM6 protein significantly interacted with 10 different proteins8,11,14,69,70,71,72,80,83,85,86 having the confidence score of ≥ 0.987 (Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table S5). Among these 10 proteins, eight common interacting proteins [MCM5, MCM4, MCM2, GINS4, CDT1, MCM7, GINS3 (GINS complex subunit 4), CDC45] in GeneMANIA and STRING based analyses indicate that MCM6 precisely interacted with the mentioned genes (Supplementary Tables S4 & S5). Almost consistent interactions result in GeneMANIA and STRING based analyses reveal that the missense SNPs in the MCM6 gene might alter the structural and functional integrity of the gene along with interacting major genes involved in DNA replication and cell proliferation pathways.
In northern European populations, the MCM6 rs4988235 SNP (commonly referred to as LCT-13910 C/T) is highly correlated with lactase persistence88,89. The rs3754686 SNP in MCM6 gene occurs more frequently globally90. Numerous studies have been conducted on the lactase persistence-associated genetic variants of the MCM6 gene, including rs145946881, rs869051967, rs41380347, rs4988235 and rs4152574791. In children, rs1057031 contributes the most to the development of metabolically unhealthy obesity92. The situation is different in the Arabian Peninsula and East Africa, where four different mutations have been found to be associated with lactose persistence. These mutations include rs41525747, rs41380347, rs820486563, and rs145946881, all of which cluster in the MCM6 gene25,93, 94.
Although different SNP in the MCM6 gene that significantly progress to different disease pathogenies have already been reported, the molecular mechanism of how our identified most significant missense SNPs (I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W) cause disease pathogenesis has not yet been discovered. The distribution of these five missense SNPs in the PF00493 and PF14551 domains, which are involved in DNA replication, cell division and cell proliferation reveals that these missense SNPs in the MCM6 might alter their function. Mutated proteins might significantly contribute to the pathogenesis as MCM6 consistently interacted with different genes in the pathways involved in DNA replication and cell division as predicted by GeneMANIA and STRING. The results of the MD simulations also support the findings. Integrating the results of all our analyses on how missense SNPs of the MCM6 gene alter its structural integrity and functional properties, programming based synthetic genetic circuit enabled personalized drugs could be innovated for individuals with missense SNPs of the MCM6 gene in the mentioned positions. This requires a deep analysis of the mentioned missense SNPs along with the integration and application of synthetic biology, machine learning and artificial intelligence under in silico, in vitro, and in vivo conditions.
Conclusion
Here, we identified 642 (4.28%) missense SNPs from 15,009 SNPs for the MCM6 gene. Then, a series of precise bioinformatics analyses were performed to identify the deleterious, probably damaging, effective and disease-associated, highly harmful and destabilizing nsSNPs that can alter the structure and function of the MCM6 protein. After a series of analyses, 11 missense common SNPs (I123S, R207C, R222C, L449F, V456M, D463G, H556Y, R602H, R633W, R658C and P815T) were found to be deleterious, probably damaging, affective, and associated with diseases. Subsequently, 8 missense SNPs were found to be highly harmful and significantly contribute to disease pathogenesis. Finally, five mutations (I123S, V456M, D463G, R602H, and R633W) were found to be more harmful since those are located in two domains. Consistent fluctuations in RMSD and RMSF value and high Rg and hydrogen bond in mutant proteins compared to WT during MD simulations reveal that these mutations might alter the protein structure and stability of the WT protein and may have a significant contribution to disease pathogenesis. Considering the impact of these missense SNPs along with their interacting pathways, personalized medicine could be developed to mitigate the harmful effects of these missense SNPs on the diseased individual/population.
Data availability
All data are included in the manuscript.
References
Irfan, M., Iqbal, T., Hashmi, S., Ghani, U. & Bhatti, A. Insilico prediction and functional analysis of nonsynonymous SNPs in human CTLA4 gene. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–11 (2022).
Ahmad, T., Valentovic, M. A. & Rankin, G. O. Effects of cytochrome P450 single nucleotide polymorphisms on methadone metabolism and pharmacodynamics. Biochem. Pharmacol. 153, 196–204 (2018).
Zhao, Y. et al. A high-throughput SNP discovery strategy for RNA-seq data. BMC Genom. 20, 1–10 (2019).
Bailey, S. F., Morales, L. A. A. & Kassen, R. Effects of synonymous mutations beyond codon bias: The evidence for adaptive synonymous substitutions from microbial evolution experiments. Genome Biol. Evol. 13, evab141 (2021).
Bappy, M. N. I. et al. Scrutinizing deleterious nonsynonymous SNPs and their effect on human POLD1 gene. Genet. Res. (Camb). 2022, e61 (2022).
Rigau, M., Juan, D., Valencia, A. & Rico, D. Intronic CNVs and gene expression variation in human populations. PloS Genet. 15, e1007902 (2019).
Tran, N. Q., Dang, H. Q., Tuteja, R. & Tuteja, N. A single subunit MCM6 from pea forms homohexamer and functions as DNA helicase. Plant Mol. Biol. 74, 327–336 (2010).
Sun, Y., Cheng, Z. & Liu, S. MCM2 in human cancer: Functions, mechanisms, and clinical significance. Mol. Med. 28, 1–15 (2022).
Li, H. T. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of MCM3 and its interacting proteins in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. lett. 20, 1–1 (2020).
Jia, M. et al. Identification of EGFR-related LINC00460/mir-338-3p/MCM4 regulatory axis as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of lung adenocarcinoma based on comprehensive bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation. Cancers (Basel) 14, 5073 (2022).
Wang, D., Li, Q., Li, Y. & Wang, H. The role of MCM5 expression in cervical cancer: Correlation with progression and prognosis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 98, 165–172 (2018).
Mao, J. et al. MCM5 is an oncogene of colon adenocarcinoma and promotes progression through cell cycle control. Acta Histochem. 125, 152072 (2023).
Harvey, C. B. et al. Characterisation of a human homologue of a yeast cell division cycle gene, MCM6, located adjacent to the 5′ end of the lactase gene on chromosome 2q21. FEBS Lett. 398, 135–140 (1996).
Zeng, T. et al. The DNA replication regulator MCM6: An emerging cancer biomarker and target. Clin. Chim. Acta. 517, 92–98 (2021).
Tye, B. K. MCM proteins in DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 649–686 (1999).
Gu, Y. et al. MCM6 indicates adverse tumor features and poor outcomes and promotes G1/S cell cycle progression in neuroblastoma. BMC Cancer 21, 1–14 (2021).
Cheng, L. et al. Expression profile and prognostic values of mini-chromosome maintenance families (MCMs) in breast cancer. Med. Sci. Monit. 26, e923673–e923681 (2020).
Liu, Y. Z. et al. MCMs expression in lung cancer: Implication of prognostic significance. J. Cancer 8, 3641 (2017).
Cai, H. Q. et al. Overexpression of MCM6 predicts poor survival in patients with glioma. Hum. Pathol. 78, 182–187 (2018).
Yu, J. et al. Knockdown of minichromosome maintenance proteins inhibits foci forming of mediator of DNA-damage checkpoint 1 in response to DNA damage in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma TE-1 cells. Biochem. (Mosc.) 81, 1221–1228 (2016).
Hotton, J. et al. Minichromosome maintenance complex component 6 (MCM6) expression correlates with histological grade and survival in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. Virchows Arch. 472, 623–633 (2018).
Ahammad, F. et al. Pharmacoinformatics and molecular dynamics simulation-based phytochemical screening of neem plant (Azadiractha indica) against human cancer by targeting MCM7 protein. Brief. Bioinform. 22, 1–15 (2021).
Kaur, S. et al. Role of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in common migraine. Egypt. J. Neurol. Psychiatry Neurosurg. 55, 1–7 (2019).
Venkata Subbiah, H., Ramesh Babu, P. & Subbiah, U. Determination of deleterious single-nucleotide polymorphisms of human LYZ C gene: An in silico study. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 20, 92 (2022).
Tishkoff, S. A. et al. Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe. Nat. Genet. 39, 31–40 (2007).
Khaled, M. L. et al. Homozygous mutation in the ELMO3 gene with keratoconus. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59, 743–743 (2018).
Sherry, S. T. et al. dbSNP: The NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 308–311 (2001).
Kamal, M. M., Islam, M. N., Rabby, M. G., Zahid, M. A. & Hasan, M. M. In silico functional and structural analysis of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in human paired box 4 gene. Biochem. Genet. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-023-10589-1 (2023).
Kakar, M. U. et al. In silico screening and identification of deleterious missense SNPs along with their effects on CD-209 gene: An insight to CD-209 related-diseases. PLoS One 16, e0247249 (2021).
Mehmood, A. et al. Structural dynamics behind clinical mutants of PncA-Asp12Ala, Pro54Leu, and His57Pro of Mycobacterium tuberculosis associated with pyrazinamide resistance. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7, 494843 (2019).
Ancien, F., Pucci, F., Godfroid, M. & Rooman, M. Prediction and interpretation of deleterious coding variants in terms of protein structural stability. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–11 (2018).
Sim, N. L. et al. SIFT web server: Predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W452–W457 (2012).
Adzhubei, I., Jordan, D. M. & Sunyaev, S. R. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 76, 7–20 (2013).
Bromberg, Y. & Rost, B. SNAP: Predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 3823–3835 (2007).
Capriotti, E. & Fariselli, P. PhD-SNPg: A webserver and lightweight tool for scoring single nucleotide variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 247–252 (2017).
Tang, H. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER-PSEP: Predicting disease-causing genetic variants using position-specific evolutionary preservation. Bioinform. 32, 2230–2232 (2016).
Capriotti, E. et al. WS-SNPs&GO: A web server for predicting the deleterious effect of human protein variants using functional annotation. BMC Genom. 14, 1–7 (2013).
Ashkenazy, H., Erez, E., Martz, E., Pupko, T. & Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf 2010: Calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 529–533 (2010).
Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P. & Casadio, R. I-Mutant2.0: Predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 306–310 (2005).
Worth, C. L., Preissner, R. & Blundell, T. L. SDM—A server for predicting effects of mutations on protein stability and malfunction. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 215–222 (2011).
Vander Meersche, Y., Cretin, G., de Brevern, A. G., Gelly, J. C. & Galochkina, T. MEDUSA: Prediction of protein flexibility from sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 166882 (2021).
Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. E. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845–858 (2015).
Rabby, M. G., Hossen, M. M., Kamal, M. M. & Islam, M. N. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of lysine histidine transporter (LHT) gene families in maize. Genet. Res. (Camb) 2022, e62 (2022).
Schrodinger, L. L. C. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. Version 1, 8 (2015).
Li, B. et al. Automated inference of molecular mechanisms of disease from amino acid substitutions. Bioinform. 25, 2744–2750 (2009).
Venselaar, H., te Beek, T. A. H., Kuipers, R. K. P., Hekkelman, M. L. & Vriend, G. Protein structure analysis of mutations causing inheritable diseases. An e-Science approach with life scientist friendly interfaces. BMC Bioinform. 11, 1–10 (2010).
Rodrigues, C. H. M., Pires, D. E. V. & Ascher, D. B. DynaMut2: Assessing changes in stability and flexibility upon single and multiple point missense mutations. Protein Sci. 30, 60–69 (2021).
Meyer, M. J. et al. mutation3D: Cancer gene prediction through atomic clustering of coding variants in the structural proteome. Hum. Mutat. 37, 447–456 (2016).
Imon, R. R. et al. Natural defense against multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Cassia occidentalis L. in vitro and in silico antibacterial activity. RSC Adv. 13, 28773–28784 (2023).
Mark, P. & Nilsson, L. Structure and dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E water models at 298 K. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9954–9960 (2001).
Roos, K. et al. OPLS3e: Extending force field coverage for drug-like small molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 1863–1874 (2019).
Zuberi, K. et al. GeneMANIA prediction server 2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 115–122 (2013).
Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2023: Protein–protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D638–D646 (2023).
Rabby, M. et al. In silico functional prediction, and expression analysis in response to drought stress of natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (NRAMP) gene family in maize. J. Data Mining Genom. Proteom. 14, 17 (2023).
Rabby, M. G. et al. In silico identification and functional prediction of differentially expressed genes in South Asian populations associated with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 18, e0294399 (2023).
Forsburg, S. L. Eukaryotic MCM proteins: Beyond replication initiation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68, 109–131 (2004).
Qibtia, M., Faryal, S., Wasim, M. & Chowdhary, F. Polymorphism in MCM6-gene associated with lactose non-persistence in Pakistani patients. Pak. J. Zool. 54, 2029–2038 (2022).
Stefl, S., Nishi, H., Petukh, M., Panchenko, A. R. & Alexov, E. Molecular mechanisms of disease-causing missense mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 3919–3936 (2013).
Nagasundaram, N. et al. Analysing the effect of mutation on protein function and discovering potential inhibitors of CDK4: Molecular modelling and dynamics studies. PLoS One 10, e0133969 (2015).
Bhattacharya, R., Rose, P. W., Burley, S. K. & Prlić, A. Impact of genetic variation on three dimensional structure and function of proteins. PLoS One 12, e0171355 (2017).
Abrusán, G. & Marsh, J. A. Alpha helices are more robust to mutations than beta strands. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005242 (2016).
Khan, S. & Vihinen, M. Spectrum of disease-causing mutations in protein secondary structures. BMC Struct. Biol. 7, 1–18 (2007).
Ahmed, S. S. et al. Characterization of intrinsically disordered regions in proteins informed by human genetic diversity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1009911 (2022).
Strnad, O., Vilémˇvilémšustr, V., Kozlíková, B. & Sochor, J. Real-time visualization of protein empty space with varying parameters. Proceedings of Biotechnol, IARIA XPS Press. 65–70 (2013)
Yang, F. et al. Protein domain-level landscape of cancer-type-specific somatic mutations. PloS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004147 (2015).
Mehmood, A., Nawab, S., Jin, Y., Kaushik, A. C. & Wei, D. Q. Mutational impacts on the N and C terminal domains of the MUC5B protein: A transcriptomics and structural biology study. ACS Omega 8, 3735 (2022).
Alam, R. et al. GC-MS analysis of phytoconstituents from Ruellia prostrata and Senna tora and identification of potential anti-viral activity against SARS-CoV-2. RSC Adv. 11, 40120–40135 (2021).
Kaushik, A. C., Mehmood, A., Wei, D. Q. & Dai, X. Robust biomarker screening using spares learning approach for liver cancer prognosis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 520620 (2020).
Yang, S. et al. MCM4 is a novel prognostic biomarker and promotes cancer cell growth in glioma. Front. Oncol. 12, (2022).
Simon, A. C., Sannino, V., Costanzo, V. & Pellegrini, L. Structure of human Cdc45 and implications for CMG helicase function. Nat. Commun. 7, 11638 (2016).
Qu, K. et al. MCM7 promotes cancer progression through cyclin D1-dependent signaling and serves as a prognostic marker for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 8, e2603–e2603 (2017).
Pozo, P. N. & Cook, J. G. Regulation and function of Cdt1; A key factor in cell proliferation and genome stability. Genes (Basel). 8, 2 (2017).
Baxley, R. M. & Bielinsky, A. K. Mcm10: A dynamic scaffold at eukaryotic replication forks. Genes (Basel.) 8, 73 (2017).
Saito, Y., Santosa, V., Ishiguro, K. I. & Kanemaki, M. T. MCMBP promotes the assembly of the MCM2–7 hetero-hexamer to ensure robust DNA replication in human cells. Elife 11, 77393 (2022).
Haring, S. J., Mason, A. C., Binz, S. K. & Wold, M. S. Cellular functions of human RPA1: Multiple roles of domains in replication, repair, and checkpoints*. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 19095 (2008).
Nguyen, H., Ung, A. & Ward, W. S. The role of ORC4 in enucleation of murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells is similar to that in oocyte polar body extrusion. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 66, 378–386 (2020).
Kushwaha, P. P., Rapalli, K. C. & Kumar, S. Geminin a multi task protein involved in cancer pathophysiology and developmental process: A review. Biochim. 131, 115–127 (2016).
Ohta, S., Tatsumi, Y., Fujita, M., Tsurimoto, T. & Obuse, C. The ORC1 cycle in human cells: II. Dynamic changes in the human orc complex during the cell cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 41535–41540 (2003).
Prasanth, S. G., Prasanth, K. V., Siddiqui, K., Spector, D. L. & Stillman, B. Human Orc2 localizes to centrosomes, centromeres and heterochromatin during chromosome inheritance. EMBO J. 23, 2651–2663 (2004).
Chen, L. et al. GINS4 suppresses ferroptosis by antagonizing p53 acetylation with Snail. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2219585120 (2023).
He, S. et al. GINS2 affects cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion in thyroid cancer via regulating MAPK signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 23, 246 (2021).
Ji, P. et al. Cyclin A1, the alternative A-type cyclin, contributes to G1/S cell cycle progression in somatic cells. Oncogene 24, 2739–2744 (2004).
Zhou, C. et al. Comprehensive analysis of GINS subunits prognostic value and ceRNA network in sarcoma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 951363 (2022).
Pina, C., May, G., Soneji, S., Hong, D. & Enver, T. MLLT3 regulates early human erythroid and megakaryocytic cell fate. Cell Stem Cell 2, 264–273 (2008).
Oehlmann, M., Score, A. J. & Blow, J. J. The role of Cdc6 in ensuring complete genome licensing and S phase checkpoint activation. J. Cell Biol. 165, 181 (2004).
Yamada, M., Masai, H. & Bartek, J. Regulation and roles of Cdc7 kinase under replication stress. Cell Cycle 13, 1859–1866 (2014).
Islam, M. N. et al. In silico functional and pathway analysis of risk genes and SNPs for type 2 diabetes in Asian population. PLoS One 17, e0268826 (2022).
Corella, D. et al. Association of the LCT-13910C>T polymorphism with obesity and its modulation by dairy products in a Mediterranean population. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19, 1707–1714 (2011).
Mattar, R., Monteiro, M. S., da Silva, J. M. K. & Carrilho, F. J. LCT-22018G>A single nucleotide polymorphism is a better predictor of adult-type hypolactasia/lactase persistence in Japanese-Brazilians than LCT-13910C>T. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 65, 1399–1400 (2010).
Enattah, N. S. et al. Evidence of still-ongoing convergence evolution of the lactase persistence T-13910 alleles in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 615–625 (2007).
Anguita-Ruiz, A., Aguilera, C. M. & Gil, Á. Genetics of lactose intolerance: An updated review and online interactive world maps of phenotype and genotype frequencies. Nutrients 12, 1–20 (2020).
Abaturov, A., Nikulina, A. & Nikulin, D. Single nucleotide variants of the MCM6 gene as a risk factor for metabolically unhealthy obesity in children. Am. Heart J. 254, 249 (2022).
Ingram, C. J. E. et al. A novel polymorphism associated with lactose tolerance in Africa: Multiple causes for lactase persistence?. Hum. Genet. 120, 779–788 (2007).
Ingram, C. J. E. et al. Multiple rare variants as a cause of a common phenotype: Several different lactase persistence associated alleles in a single ethnic group. J. Mol. Evol. 69, 579–588 (2009).
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their appreciation to the supporting project (number: RSP2024R357) of King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for instrumental and technical support to conduct molecular dynamics simulation study. The authors also grateful to the ICT Division, Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications and Information Technology, Bangladesh for providing research assistantship and support for consumable items to perform this research (Grant ID: 24IF16463, Financial year 2022–23).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.M.K., M.A.R. and M.M.H. conceived the ideas and designed the methodology; M.M.K. collected the data; M.M.K. analyzed the data; M.M.K, M.A.R. and M.M.H. led the writing of the manuscript, M.M.K., M.M.H. M.E.K.T., and M.O.F led the review and editing of the manuscript, with critical contributions by M.S.M., M.G.R., M.N.I., and T.A.W. All authors gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kamal, M.M., Mia, M.S., Faruque, M.O. et al. In silico functional, structural and pathogenicity analysis of missense single nucleotide polymorphisms in human MCM6 gene. Sci Rep 14, 11607 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62299-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62299-2
Keywords
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
