Abstract
To evaluate the development of neutralizing Anti-Spike Protein IgG (Anti-S-IgG) during twin pregnancies before conception vs. during pregnancy. In this prospective study, three blood samples were collected from pregnant women and subjected to anti-S-IgG immunodiagnostics. The patient’s medical records, including vaccination and PCR test results, were collected from the hospital’s electronic database. Age-matched non-pregnant women were used as a control group. We enrolled 83 women with twin pregnancies. 49 women were vaccinated before conception, 21 women were vaccinated during pregnancy, and 13 were not vaccinated. Of the 13 women who weren’t vaccinated, three became positive during pregnancy, and all three were severely ill. By contrast, in women who were vaccinated during or before pregnancy, COVID-19 infection during pregnancy caused only mild symptoms. A ten-fold lower level of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG in the 3rd trimester was observed in healthy women who were vaccinated before conception and remained healthy until discharge from the hospital after delivery 1605 (IQR: 763–2410) compared to the healthy women who were vaccinated during pregnancy 152 AU/mL (IQR: 54–360). This difference was higher among women who were infected by COVID-19 (as verified by a positive PCR test). The third-trimester level of neutralizing Ant-S-IgG in the infected group was 4770 AU/mL (4760–6100) in infected women vaccinated before conception compared to those vaccinated during pregnancy who had 70 AU/mL (IQR: 20–170) (p < 0.001). In women vaccinated at 13–16 weeks gestation, neutralizing Anti-S-IgG at 20–22 weeks went up to 372 AU/mL (IQR: 120–1598) but rapidly dropped to 112 AU/mL (IQR: 54–357) at 28–30 weeks, (p < 0.001), a faster decline than in women vaccinated at a median 22 weeks before conception. Being infected by COVID-19 before conception was linked to having low Anti-S-IgG levels during pregnancy, whereas being infected by COVID-19 during pregnancy led to a very high response in the 3rd trimester. In twin pregnancies, significantly lower neutralizing Anti-S-IgG levels were observed in women vaccinated during pregnancy compared to those vaccinated before conception, whether infected or not infected by COVID-19. A full course of vaccination before conception is recommended.
Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: October 4, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ID: NCT04595214.
Similar content being viewed by others
SARS-CoV-2 virus infection is associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome, and it remains a major global concern1. Shortly after its initial outbreak, studies indicated that pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 (“Covid-19”) developed more severe symptoms than age-matched non-pregnant women2,3,4. Its severity in pregnancy was attributed to having higher body mass compared to age-matched non-pregnant women and constricted chest space due to the growing uterus, which are all considered to exacerbate the load on the lungs and place an elevated burden on the cardiac output5. It has been argued that since pregnant women experience increased immune tolerance to avoid fetal rejection, this process should also increase their vulnerability to severe symptoms6. The immune system's overreaction to the viral infection (“the cytokine storm”) may thus exacerbate the known increase of cytokines already reported for other pregnancy-related complications such as preeclampsia, early IUGR, and gestational diabetes5,6. Previous studies have indicated a 3-to-tenfold prevalence of severe COVID-19 during pregnancy7.
In Israel, the authors of this study were among the first in the world to formulate guidelines for vaccinating all pregnant women during gestation, including those carrying singletons and twins. These guidelines were published soon after the vaccine became available in the country. Several reports showed a high rate of vaccination among pregnant women compared to other countries8. Extensive proactive efforts by medical staff to explain the safety of the vaccine to their patients and evidence of infant protection by vaccination were major drivers for vaccine acceptance9. However, no study has examined the development of neutralizing IgG following BNT-162b2 Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 virus infection in twin pregnancies. This study examined the longitudinal development of neutralizing antibodies after vaccinations and viral infection before conception and during twin pregnancy to fill this gap.
Methods
Sample
Pregnant women aged 18 and over carrying two live fetuses were enrolled after providing their written informed consent. Women were excluded if they previously had twins that vanished or triplets that were spontaneously reduced to twins. The gestational week was determined by the last menstrual period and by the crown-rump length10. Women who subsequently lost one fetus or underwent twin reduction to singleton due to fetal defects remained in the study.
Medical, demographic, and pregnancy history were collected at enrolment, and each clinical visit included a complete anatomical evaluation by sonography, measurements of blood pressure, and three blood drawings in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters. Delivery and pregnancy outcomes were retrieved from the hospital medical records of the delivery and the neonatal clinics. and, from interviews with patients if they delivered in other hospitals.
Serological testing
Blood was collected from all women for serological testing at gestational weeks 11–13, 20–22, and 28–30 to test for anti-spike (S) antibodies (Anti-S-IgG) to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The test was performed using the LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy) with 97.4% and 98.5% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Samples were considered negative for antibody titers at < 13 AU/mL11.
A real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (rtPCR) test was performed in the case of suspected infection either locally or in public clinics using the FDA-approved TaqPath Combo Kit targeting the N2, ORF1Ab, and S genes12. Infection was then confirmed by a quantitative test of Anti-N-IgG to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein using Elecsys® immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All methods were performed in accordance to the relevant guidelines and regulations. The sensitivity and specificity of this assay are both > 99%. The cutoff index (COI) was defined as < 1.0 for non-reactive samples13. Serological values are expressed as arbitrary units per milliliter (AU//mL according to the standardization of the World Health Organization (WHO)14.
Vaccination
Pregnant women vaccination with BNT162b2 Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 beginning in February 2021, and women at gestation age (GA) 15 and 19 got the first two doses. Eventually, more and more women conceived after being vaccinated before pregnancy as once installed, vaccination was free and offered to all, with wide access everywhere; all unvaccinated women in our study actively refused vaccination. The median vaccination before pregnancy was 22 weeks. Vaccination records were retrieved from the patient’s vaccination cards and verified against the national registry records of the government. The time after immunization was calculated from the end of the second vaccination. We also collected data on the third booster shot but not all women took it. The delay between vaccination and testing was recorded..
Anti-S-IgG level of age-matched non-pregnant women of the hospital employee were retrieved from the hospital records. These women were tested immediately before, one month after, and three months after their third vaccination by BNT162b2 Pfizer/BioNTech.
Data on singleton vaccination was extracted from publications15,16.
Statistical analysis
The SPSS statistical package version 29 (IBM) was used to conduct Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney non-parametric tests to compare the groups for the continuous variables. Continuous variables were not normally distributed hence we provide medians (Me) and interquartile ranges (IQR). Chi-square tests were applied to categorical values presented as n (%). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethics approval
This study is a part of the Erapermed project on the evolution of twin pregnancies (JTC2019-61)17. Date was extracted from one of the study sites at Shamir Medical Center. An amended ethics approval was specifically obtained by “Shamir local ethic committee” to evaluate the serological response to BNT162b2 Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination to SARS-CoV-2 (Trial # 0043–20-ASF, Israel Ministry of Health Authorization # 202,016,632). All participants expressed their consent to participate in the study by signing a specialized add-on consent form approved by the ethical committee, and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of serological and PCR testing as issued by Israel Ministry of Health.
Results
Cohort characteristics
A total of 83 women with twin pregnancies were enrolled from December 2020 to March 2022. Of these, 74 were carrying di-chorionic di-amniotic (DCDA), and 9 had mono-chorionic di-amniotic (MCDA) twins (Fig. 1). Of these women, 49 women were vaccinated before conception, 21 were immunized during pregnancy, and 13 were non-vaccinated (Fig. 2).
The median maternal age at enrolment was 34.3 years, the median GA at enrollment was 12.3 weeks, and the median BMI was 24.9 (all values were centered on the medians). Conception was spontaneous for all MCDC and 47.3% of the DCDA (p < 0.001). There were 37.2% nulliparous, and the proportion between Jews and Arabs was as it is in the regional population (Top of Table 1). Chronic medical complications (diabetes mellitus, hyper-or-hypothyroidism, etc.) were rare, and none had chronic hypertension or cardiovascular diseases. All these features correspond to the general characteristics of our Twin Clinic population17,18.
Pregnancy outcomes
All MCDC pregnancies were delivered by Caesarean section (CS) compared to 57.1% of the DCDA. The remainder of the DCDA twins were delivered vaginally (40.5%) or via tool-assisted delivery (Middle of Table 1).
Among the DCDA pregnancies, 50 women delivered twins (100 babies) and ten delivered singletons. This was due to spontaneous demise (2 cases), and selective reduction due to major genetic or structural malformation (8 cases (Fig. 1). Also, there were 2 cases of complete pregnancy loss, and 12 women didn’t deliver at the time we concluded the study. (Fig. 1, left side).
Among MCDA twins, 6 women delivered 12 babies, two lost their pregnancy spontaneously, and 1 didn’t deliver at the time of study conclusions. (Fig. 1, right side).
Altogether 122 babies were born. (Fig. 1). There were 47.5% females (71.4% in the MCDC). No significant differences were found between the birthweight of babies born in MCDA and DCDA pregnancies. Of the live newborns, there were 55.6% who had low birthweight (< 2,500 g), but only 6.6% had very low birth weight (< 1500 g). The majority of the newborns had a normal APGAR score at 1 and 5 min, the duration of NICU days was 10 days, and no newborn death after delivery (Bottom of Table 1).
Pregnancy complications
The rate of gestational diabetes melilotus (GDM) was 21.2%, preeclampsia was 5%, and preterm delivery (delivery < 37 weeks) was 55.4%, (Middle of Table 1) all of which are within the range of known values for twins in Israel17,18.
Vaccination and susceptibility to COVID-19
The study included 83 patients, of which 70 were vaccinated, and 13 were not (Table 2). Of the non-vaccinated women, nine were healthy (69.2%), and four became PCR positive (30.7%). One was diagnosed before conception, and three (23.1%) contracted COVID-19 during pregnancy (Table 2). All three were admitted to the hospital in the third trimester with very severe symptoms. Luckily, they delivered healthy babies.
As the first and second vaccinations during pregnancy were at GA 15 and 19 weeks, Testing was performed at GA 12.1 (pre-vaccination), 22.4 (3 weeks after the second vaccination), and at 29 weeks (10 weeks after the second vaccination). Pre-pregnancy vaccination was performed at a median of 22.7 weeks pre-conception. Thus, testing at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters performed at 34.8, 45.1, and 51 weeks after the second pre-conception vaccination.
According to Table 2, among the 70 women who were vaccinated, 56 (80%) were healthy. Of the 14 patients who were immunized but viral infected (PCR +), there were five were vaccinated before pregnancy and PCR + before conception (5%), seven were vaccinated before conception and PCR + during pregnancy (10%), and two were vaccinated during pregnancy and the viral infected (2.9%) (Table 2). There was no case of PCR + before pregnancy who was PCR positive during pregnancy. Altogether, vaccination appears to protect women who were pregnant with twins; if they were PCR + , their symptoms were mild and need no special admission to the hospital before delivery.
Serological response
Response as a function of time of vaccination
Time of vaccination
In women who were vaccinated before conception (violin plot, Fig. 3A), the level of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG doubled from the first to the second trimester (p = 0.05), and tripled from the second to the third trimester (p < 0.01), reaching a median of 1475 AU/mL (IQR: 392–3020), reflecting a sevenfold increase during pregnancy (overall, p = 0.012). Nevo L et al. demonstrated that vaccination with BNT-162b2 Pfizer/BioNTech during singleton pregnancies was followed by a third-trimester Anti-S-IgG level of 798 AU/mL (IQR: 424–1623)19, indicating that vaccination during pregnancy with twins compared to singleton pregnancy is generating a weaker level of Anti-S-IgG, which also decay faster.
There were 56 women who were vaccinated and healthy—37 were vaccinated before conception and 19 during pregnancy (Table 2). Among healthy vaccinated before conception (median—22 weeks before conception), the neutralizing Anti-S-IgG significantly increases from 231 AU/mL (IQR: 70–707) in the 1st trimester to 1605 AU/mL (IQR: 763–2410) in the third trimester (p < 0.015). Among women vaccinated during pregnancy (gestational week 15–19), the levels increased from 0 in the 1st trimester to 417 AU/mL (IQR: 114–985) in the 2nd trimester (3–4 weeks after vaccination), and it then decreases back to 152 AU/mL (IQR: 54–360) (Fig. 3B). This decay of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG reflects the immunosuppression state of the pregnant women.
The main result of our study was the X10 and above levels of Anti-S-IgG when vaccination was before conception compared to vaccination during pregnancy, as manifested in the 3rd trimester (Fig. 3A,B). The serological response in women vaccinated during pregnancy showed an increase from 0 in the first trimester to a median of 372 AU/mL in the second trimester, which rapidly dropped to one-third of this amount in the third trimester to a median of 112 AU/mL (IQR: 54–357) (Fig. 3A,B). In third-trimester singleton pregnancies vaccinated during pregnancy, the Anti-S-IgG level is 380 AU/mL (IQR: 65.35–1442.5), which is higher compared to twins (p < 0.005)14,15. It appears that during pregnancy, the immune system is suppressed, and this immunotolerance is higher in twins.
No significant differences were found between DCDA and MCDA twins for any of the tested parameters (Table 2, supplementary Fig. 1).
Viral infection and time of vaccination
While 14 vaccinated women (out of 70—20% compared to 31% among non-vaccinated),all had very mild disease. There were 5 who were vaccinated and infected before conception, and all had low level of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG throughout pregnancy. The 9 who got infected during pregnancy had a very high level of Anti-S-IgG (Fig. 4A,B). iInfection during pregnancy is accompanied by very high level of neutralizing Anyti-S-IgG to protect these women and their babies.
Serological response in non-pregnant women
We compared our twin pregnant women neutralizing Anti-S-IgG levels to the results of the sample of non-pregnant women of a matched tested in the same period of time. The non-pregnant women were tested one and three months after the third vaccination. The one-month delay (vaccination to serological testing) among non-pregnant women was similar to the 3–4 weeks delay between vaccination and second-trimester testing of twin pregnancy immunized during pregnancy. Anti-S-IgG is 1,485 AU/mL (IQR: 174–2950) among the non-pregnant, compared to 417 AU/mL (IQR: 114–985), p < 0.03) in pregnant women, emphasizing the weakness of the immune protection during pregnancy (Figs. 3 and 5). The three-month delay is close to the delay between pregnancy vaccination and third-trimester testing (10–12 weeks). Here, the differences are even greater among the healthy nonpregnant women; Anti-S-IgG levels were 1,710 vs. 152 in the pregnant women who were vaccinated during pregnancy, showing the immunosuppressive state response of pregnancy (Figs. 3 and 5). The story for those vaccinated before conception is totally different. Although tested at 45.1- and 51-week delay between vaccination and testing, the third-trimester level of Anti-S-IgG is indistinguishable from the level of non-pregnant tested after three months (1605 vs. 1710).
Discussion
We see now that COVID-19 is turning into a seasonal viral infection and multiple variants as predicted by the World Health Organization (WHO)1,20, and at seasonal waves new cases are added every day. Hence, information related to the anti-viral vaccination and the viral infection—remains crucial. Studies have shown that maternal vaccination effectively protects pregnant women, their fetuses, and newborns from becoming infected8,11. Extensive studies support the importance of vaccination of gravid subjects before and during pregnancy and have confirmed its efficacy in reducing the rate of infection and protecting them from severe symptoms21. However, no studies have explored twin pregnancies22. The current study provides the first detailed evidence on the natural history of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG in twin pregnancies.
A main result of our study is that in twin pregnancies vaccinated before conception the levels of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG in the 3rd trimester is 10 × higher than in those vaccinated during pregnancy. Vaccination before conception is accompanied by a faster increase, and a slower decay of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG compared to vaccination during pregnancy. These results underscore the importance of immunization before conception. This is important since other studies have shown that the strength of the response of the neutralizing Anti-S-IgG may influence the transfer of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG to the newborn15,16,
Pregnant women with twins have a larger placental mass that further reduces the chest cavity, creating a greater pressure on the lungs, and on the cardiovascular system. This is accompanied by higher incidence of preeclampsia, IUGR, gestational diabetes. The latter appears to be related to immunotolerance and here we see how the immune suppression impair an effective Anti-S-IgG protection5,6,23,24.
One explanation for the lower relative increase and the rapid decay of Anti-S-IgG in twin gravid women vaccinated during pregnancy is the potential uptake by the larger placental mass25. Placental uptake of Anti-S-IgG may also explain the similar Anti-S-IgG levels found in DCDA and MCDA. It remains to be seen why this was apparently not a factor in cases where vaccination took place before conception26,27,28.
These findings also reinforce the importance of vaccination, given that the women who were immunized before conception and during pregnancy developed very mild symptoms, whereas the unvaccinated women who contracted COVID-19 had severe inflammatory and respiratory symptoms that required hospitalization. Overall, these results confirm that in twins, as in singleton pregnancies, being immunized protects pregnant women from severe cases of COVID-19.
Limitations
The study was conducted as the COVID-19 pandemic developed. Thus, our quasi-naturalistic study constraints led to variations in the time of vaccinations and contributed considerably to the individual variance in the levels of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG. Diversity was also contributed by the wave of the pandemic, which influenced patient behavior. Due to the study's timing, we could evaluate cases who were vaccinated during and before pregnancy. Twins are the minority of pregnancies (3% of the population) , and very large cohorts were hard to ascertain since the rate of both spontaneous and IVF pregnancies went down during the pandemic. However, this actually enabled us to review multiple scenarios. Since COVID-19 is still present, we feel that the clinical question regarding the time of vaccination in pregnancy, especially twin pregnancy, is important, and our study answers this important question.
Another limitation is that data regarding a cell-mediated immune response that would have enhanced our understanding of the mother's immune response and immunity was not collected. Further studies are thus warranted.
Conclusion
Immunizing pregnant women is crucial to protect mothers and their newborns from severe disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study provides evidence that as in singletons, gravid women with twins benefitted from being vaccinated, and if they were contracted with the virus, they only experienced mild symptoms. Given the high risk of COVID-19 during pregnancy, especially in multiple pregnancies, the findings show that vaccination is important for pregnant women, and is ten times more effective if taken prior to the conception, since the immune system of pregnant women is suppressed. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- BNT:
-
162B2 Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination—the messenger RNA vaccination against COVID-19 that was developed by the companies Pfizer and BioNTech
- IgG:
-
Immuno-globulin type G
- Anti-S-IgG:
-
Immunoglobulin type G (IgG) against the spike protein of Covid-19 virus
- Anti-N-IgG:
-
Immuno-globulins targeting the nucleuse N2 protein of Covid-19
- Anti-N-IgG SARS-COV-2:
-
The seventh known coronavirus to infect people, also known as COVID-19
- COV-2-Trimeric S-IgG -b1:
-
A test developed by DISORIN company named the LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 Trimeric S IgG assay that enables the reliable detection of IgG to Trimeric spike (S) protein IgG—the body’s natural defense response against SARS-CoV-2-Trimeric S-IgG -b1
- MCDA twins:
-
Mono-chorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies
- DCDA twins:
-
Di-chorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies
- PCR:
-
Polynuclear chain reaction
- rtPCR:
-
Real-time PCR
- IUGR:
-
Intra Uterine Growth Restriction
- GDM:
-
Gestational diabetes melilotus
- FDA:
-
Food and Drug Administration
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
- BMI:
-
Body Mass Index
- ART:
-
Assisted Reproduction Reaction
- APGAR:
-
Standardized score to evaluate infants shortly after birth as developed by Virginia APGAR and includes five criteria: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration. For each criterion, newborns can receive a score from 0 to 2, and an integrated a score could be 10 max
- NICU:
-
Newborn intensive care unit
- GA:
-
Gestational age in weeks
- MA:
-
Maternal age
References
Msemburi, W. et al. The WHO estimates of excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature 613(7942), 130–137 (2023).
Juan, J. et al. Effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcome: Systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 56, 15–27 (2020).
Crovetto, F. et al. Seroprevalence and presentation of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy. Lancet 396, 530–531 (2020).
Mor, M. et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on excess perinatal mortality and morbidity in Israel. Am. J. Perinatol. 38, 398–403 (2021).
DeBolt, C. A. et al. Pregnant women with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 have increased composite morbidity compared with nonpregnant matched controls. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 224, 510.e1-510.e12 (2021).
Liu, H. et al. Why are pregnant women susceptible to COVID-19? An immunological viewpoint. J. Reprod. Immunol. 139, 103122 (2020).
Sheikh, J. et al. Global variations in the burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its outcomes in pregnant women by geographical region and country’s income status: A meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health 7, e010060 (2022).
Toussia-Cohen, S. et al. Maternal and neonatal immune responses following COVID-19 infection and vaccinations in pregnancy. Vaccines 10, 2019 (2022).
Marín-Cos, A. et al. Maternal vaccination greatly depends on your trust in the healthcare system: A qualitative study on the acceptability of maternal vaccines among pregnant women and healthcare workers in Barcelona, Spain. Vaccines 10, 2015 (2022).
Hadlock, F. P., Shah, Y. P., Kanon, D. J. & Lindsey, J. V. Fetal crown-rump length: Reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5–18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology 182, 501–505 (1992).
Jung, K. et al. Performance evaluation of three automated quantitative immunoassays and their correlation with a surrogate virus neutralization test in coronavirus disease 19 patients and pre-pandemic controls. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 35, e23921 (2021).
Jiang, Y. et al. Establishment of quantitative RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Eur. J. Med. Res. 26, 147 (2021).
Mulchandani, R. et al. Accuracy of UK Rapid Test Consortium (UK-RTC) “AbC-19 Rapid Test” for detection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in key workers: Test accuracy study. BMJ 371, 4262 (2020).
Infantino, M. et al. The WHO International Standard for COVID-19 serological tests: Towards harmonization of anti-spike assays. Int. Immunopharmacol. 100, 108095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108095 (2021).
Sunder, A. et al. Maternal COVID-19 disease and COVID-19 immunization. Cureus. 14, e28328 (2022).
Sunder, A. et al. COVID-19 vaccinations in pregnancy: Save mother and baby from COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14532 (2022).
Maymon, R., Meiri, H., Svirski, R., Weiner, E. & Cuckle, H. Maternal serum screening marker levels in twin pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 299, 655–663 (2019).
Maymon, R. et al. Developing a new algorithm for first and second-trimester preeclampsia screening in twin pregnancies. Hypertens. Preg. 36, 108–115 (2017).
Nevo, L. et al. Boosting maternal and neonatal humoral immunity following SARS-CoV-2 infection using a single messenger RNA vaccine dose. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 227, 486.e1-486.e10 (2022).
COVID-19 Projections—Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, https://www.who.int/news/item/20-05-2022-world-health-statistics-2022
Etti, M. et al. Maternal vaccination: A review of current evidence and recommendations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 226, 459–474 (2022).
Deng, J. et al. Association of infection with different SARS-CoV-2 variants during pregnancy with maternal and perinatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 19, 15932 (2022).
Vazquez-Pagan, A. & Schultz-Cherry, S. Serological responses to influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Microorganisms. 9, 2305 (2021).
Abraham, C., Pichichero, M., Eisenberg, J. & Singh, S. Third-trimester maternal vaccination against pertussis and pertussis antibody concentrations. Obstet. Gynecol. 131, 364–369 (2018).
Malinowski, A. K., Noureldin, A. & Othman, M. COVID-19 susceptibility in pregnancy: Immune/inflammatory considerations, the role of placental ACE-2 and research considerations. Reprod Biol. 20, 568–572 (2020).
Shen, C. J. et al. Evaluation of transplacental antibody transfer in SARS-CoV-2-immunized pregnant women. Vaccines 10, 101 (2022).
Larcade, R. et al. Maternal-fetal immunologic response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in a symptomatic vulnerable population: A prospective cohort. J Infect Dis. 225, 800–809 (2022).
Moriarty, K. et al. COVID-19 and differential effects in twins: Insights from placenta pathology. Placenta 124, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2022.05.014 (2022).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Revital Yager RN and Orit Baram RN for their dedicated involvement in patient enrollment and data collection, and extend their thanks to Anat Gayer for handling the patient scheduling throughout this study.
Funding
Pretwin Screen project is funded by the Erapermed Project # JTC2019-61, Israel Ministry of Health Project # 2020166 (both to RM, HM, RS), and Shamir Medical Center "Taftafot" Grant #12/2021 (RS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RS, HM, and RM were involved in the study design and solicited funding for this study. RS, NG, NK and O L-R collected pregnancy and medical records. The serological testing design was planned and conducted by RB and M L-R. M, who also integrated the serological database into the patient’s medical records as configured by NK, RS, HM, and A S–H. NS collected and verified the delivery records. The statistical analysis was conducted by A S–N. M L-R, HM, RS, A S–N and RM who performed the data assessment. All authors were engaged in preparing the abstract and manuscript. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria. The article is original, has not already been published in a journal, and is not currently under consideration by another journal. We agree to the terms of the BioMed Central Copyright and License Agreement.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Svirsky, R., Rabbi, M.L., Hamad, R.A. et al. Vaccination in twin pregnancies: comparison between immunization before conception and during pregnancy. Sci Rep 14, 10813 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61504-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61504-6
Keywords
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.