Abstract
CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by global developmental delay, early-onset seizures, intellectual disability, visual and motor impairments. Unlike Rett Syndrome (RTT), CDD lacks a clear regression period. Patients with CDD frequently encounter gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances and exhibit signs of subclinical immune dysregulation. However, the underlying causes of these conditions remain elusive. Emerging studies indicate a potential connection between neurological disorders and gut microbiota, an area completely unexplored in CDD. We conducted a pioneering study, analyzing fecal microbiota composition in individuals with CDD (n = 17) and their healthy relatives (n = 17). Notably, differences in intestinal bacterial diversity and composition were identified in CDD patients. In particular, at genus level, CDD microbial communities were characterized by an increase in the relative abundance of Clostridium_AQ, Eggerthella, Streptococcus, and Erysipelatoclostridium, and by a decrease in Eubacterium, Dorea, Odoribacter, Intestinomonas, and Gemmiger, pointing toward a dysbiotic profile. We further investigated microbiota changes based on the severity of GI issues, seizure frequency, sleep disorders, food intake type, impairment in neuro-behavioral features and ambulation capacity. Enrichment in Lachnoclostridium and Enterobacteriaceae was observed in the microbiota of patients with more severe GI symptoms, while Clostridiaceae, Peptostreptococcaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Christensenellaceae, and Ruminococcaceae were enriched in patients experiencing daily epileptic seizures. Our findings suggest a potential connection between CDD, microbiota and symptom severity. This study marks the first exploration of the gut-microbiota-brain axis in subjects with CDD. It adds to the growing body of research emphasizing the role of the gut microbiota in neurodevelopmental disorders and opens doors to potential interventions that target intestinal microbes with the aim of improving the lives of patients with CDD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the X-linked cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 CDKL5 gene. It leads to severe global developmental delay, early-onset epileptic encephalopathy, intellectual disability, cortical visual impairment, fine and gross motor impairment, hypotonia, sleep disturbances, and hand stereotypies1. While some symptoms are similar to Rett Syndrome (RTT), CDD is distinguished by the lack of a regression period and the early seizure onset. Currently, no treatments are available for CDD.
Patients with CDD often experience gastrointestinal (GI) problems2, altered growth pattern, and manifest subclinical immune dysfunction along with a pattern of smoldering inflammation. This inflammation pattern is probably a result of a malfunctioning inflammatory regulatory system characterized by an aberrant cytokine response3,4. The reason for this dysfunction is not well understood, but it has also been observed in patients with classic RTT. Studies have found that RTT patients display changes in their gut microbiota composition5,6, which is the collection of microorganisms that live in the GI tract in equilibrium with their host7. This recent research suggests that changes in the gut could be linked to neurological issues. For example, multiple studies in rodents have shown a connection between the gut microbiota and the central nervous system8,9. Microbiota signals and byproducts have been found to play a role in regulating various aspects of brain-related processes and behavior, including stress responses, anxiety and emotional behaviors, cognitive function, myelination, neurogenesis, microglia maturation, and blood–brain barrier integrity10,11.
Recent studies also suggest a possible role of gut microorganisms in neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorders (ASD)12. Both patients with ASD and mouse models have been found to have GI dysfunction and changes in the gut microbiota13,14,15,16. Intriguingly, the transfer of fecal microbiota from human donors with ASD was able to induce hallmark autistic behaviors in the recipient mice, suggesting the existence of a potential link between ASD neurological impairments and the intestinal microbes17.
Despite emerging evidence has shown a connection between microbiota and neurodevelopmental disorders, no studies have examined the gut-microbiota-brain axis in individuals with CDD thus far.
Here, for the first time, we analyzed the fecal microbiota composition in a cohort of patients with CDD with respect to their healthy neurotypical siblings or relatives. Our data demonstrate the existence of differences in the diversity and composition of the intestinal bacteria in CDD. Moreover, we investigated changes in the microbiota composition in the CDD cohort based on the severity of GI disturbances, frequency of seizures, the presence of sleep disorders, the type of food intake (feeding through food in pieces or smoothies), the impairment of neuro-behavioral features (by the RTT Behaviour Questionnaire), and the possibility of ambulation.
Results
Cohort description
We enrolled 17 individuals with CDD, with identified CDKL5 gene pathogenic variants (mean age ± SD, 10.9 ± 10.6; 15 females, 2 males). Clinical features are summarized in Table 1, whereas a detailed report on scale scoring is provided in the supplementary Table S1 online. As a control group, we collected stool samples from 17 healthy siblings (or parents if the patient was an only child), who were not on any medication (mean age 28.5 ± 17.2; 13 females).
Dietary nutrient evaluation
Diet is known to be one of the major determinants of the gut microbiota composition, since the types of food we consume directly influence the composition and diversity of microorganisms residing in our GI tract18. Despite the 3-days food diary analysis showing a lower daily energy intake in CDD subjects compared to healthy controls (HC) (p = 0.002), no differences in the percentage of protein, lipid, carbohydrate, and dietary fiber intake in the two groups were observed (Suppl. Fig. S1 and Suppl. Table S1). Moreover, the energy intake and macronutrient values are in line with the Italian national recommendations (LARN, Italian Society of Human Nutrition Nutrients and Energy Reference Intake Levels for Italian Population. Available online: https://sinu.it/tabelle-larn-2014/ -last accessed on 27 October 2023-).
Analysis of fecal microbiota composition revealed differences between CDD patients and healthy relatives
The gut microbiota was characterized by next-generation sequencing using V3–V4 hyper-variable 16S rRNA genomic region. On average, 16,264.68 ± 4903 high-quality non-chimeric reads were considered for gut microbiota analysis.
We first compared the microbial communities of subjects with CDD with those of healthy siblings or parents (HC). We found a decrease in biodiversity in patients with CDD in comparison to healthy controls using three distinct alpha diversity metrics (Fig. 1A).
Similarly, the beta-diversity analysis, which assesses the degree of phylogenetic similarity between microbial communities, revealed distinct clustering of the CDD patients' microbiota compared to the HC group (Fig. 1B).
We then explored taxonomic differences in terms of relative abundances in the two groups, CDD and HC. According to the GTDB bacterial taxonomy19, at phylum level we observed a significant increase (p = 0.006) in Firmicutes (Bacillales, Erysipelotrichales, Lactobacillales), and a trend toward a decrease in Firmicutes_A (Christensenellales, Eubacteriales, Lachnospirales, Oscillospirales) and in Bacteroidota in patients with CDD (Suppl. Dataset S1).
Among the most abundant families (Fig. 2A), CDD were enriched in Erysipelotrichaceae (p = 0.059), Lactobacillaceae (p = 0.093), Veillonellaceae (p = 0.1), Coprobacillaceae (p = 0.107), Streptococcaceae (p = 0.187), and Enterococcaceae (p = 0.195). Notably, CDD displayed a significant depletion in CAG-74 (Christensenellales) that has been associated with a health status20.
At genus level (Fig. 2B), we found CDD microbial communities to be characterized by an increase in the relative abundance of Clostridium_AQ (p = 0.012), Eggerthella (p = 0.014), Streptococcus (p = 0.114), and Erysipelatoclostridium (p = 0.126), and by a decrease in Eubacterium (Anaerobutyricum) spp. (p = 0.036), Dorea (p = 0.004), Odoribacter (p = 0.01), Intestinomonas (p = 0.03), and Gemmiger (p = 0.05).
For the complete list of taxa see Suppl. Dataset S1.
Overall, our analysis demonstrates the existence of differences in the composition of the gut microbiota in patients with CDD.
Dissecting the composition of the gut microbiota based on patients clinical features
We then sought to explore differences in the CDD bacterial composition according to each specific clinical feature. In particular, we investigated changes in the microbiota based on the possibility to walk, frequency of seizures, the severity of GI disturbances, the presence of sleep disorders, the score obtained in the RTT Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ), and the feeding mode (smoothies vs in pieces). Although the number of patients was low, since the disorder is particularly rare, we could observe a tendency to a decrease in alpha-diversity related to the lack of ambulation (Fig. 3). Principal coordinate analysis of unweighted unifrac distance showed no significant differences among the patients with CDD classified based on clinical features (Suppl. Fig. S2).
The Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of effect size (LEfSe) method21 was used to highlight bacterial taxa that might serve as biomarkers for a defined clinical feature (Figs. 4, 5 and 6).
Subjects with CDD not able to deambulate (76.5%) showed a bacterial ecosystem characterized by an increase in the relative abundance of Enterococcaceae, Streptococcaceae and Veillonella spp. (Fig. 4). On the contrary, individuals with CDD able to walk, either independently or with support, were enriched in Bacteroidaceae (B.vulgatus), Methanobacteriaceae (M. smithii), Ruminococcaceae (Subdoligranum, Ruminococcus, and Roseburia spp), Porphyromodanaceae (Parabacteroides spp), and Dialister spp.
As refractory epilepsy is a major challenge in CDD, we investigated patients microbiota composition based on seizure frequency. 7 patients were included in the daily seizure group, the other 9 patients showed weekly/monthly epileptic seizures. The LEfSe analysis demonstrated significant differences in the subgroups. Indeed, the daily group had a significant enrichment in bacterial taxa belonging to the family of Clostridiaceae, Peptostreptococcaceae (Romboutsia spp), Erysipelothricaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae (Fig. 5b).
Different bacterial taxa were also observed according to GI discomfort evaluated by a modified 6-item GI severity index -GISI-, assessing constipation, diarrhea, stool consistency, stool smell, flatulence, and abdominal pain22. Patients displaying a score below 3 (indicating a normal condition or moderate symptoms) showed a significant enrichment in taxa related to GI homeostasis such as Blautia, Eubacterium, Roseburia, and Bifidobacterium spp. (Fig. 5a). On the other hand, subjects scoring above 3 were characterized by an enrichment in Enterobacteriaceae that are known to be associated with intestinal inflammation and dysbiosis23.
The genus Lachnoclostridium was the indicator taxon for CDD displaying sleep difficulties (Fig. 5c). This genus has been associated with intestinal barrier damage and obstructive sleep apnea24, was found to be enriched in less physically active older-adult insomnia patients25, and negatively correlated with sleep time in a cohort of middle-aged japanese26. On the other hand, the gut microbiota in individuals with CDD not experiencing sleep problems displayed an enrichment of taxa generally related to eubiosis, such as the genera Eubacterium, Bifidobacterium and Blautia (Fig. 5c).
The specific RSBQ scale, evaluating neurological symptoms and intellectual disabilities, was also used for the LEfSe analysis by grouping patients according to their score: > 30 or < 30 (the higher the score the higher the severity). Patients affected by CDD with a score over 30 (64.7%) displayed an enrichment in the genus Escherichia, belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family, compared with those with lower scores (< 30) (Fig. 6a).
Significant differences in composition were also observed based on the type of ingested food: in pieces vs smoothies. We observed an overall enrichment in Bacteroidia linked to food ingestion in pieces (58.8%), and in Firmicutes in subjects eating smoothies (41.2%). Leuconostocaceae and Streptococcaceae were more present in patients eating smoothies, while the consumption of food in pieces was associated with an enrichment in Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Dialister and Subdoligranum spp. (Fig. 6b).
Overall, this analysis demonstrates that the grade of clinical features observed in subjects with CDD is associated with the enrichment of specific bacteria taxa, which could potentially serve as candidate biomarkers of symptom severity.
Discussion
The disruption of the microbiota-gut-brain axis, attributed to disturbances in the gut microbiota (i.e., dysbiosis), is considered a potential contributing factor to various neurodevelopmental disorders, including ASD, rare neurological diseases, and epilepsy8,16,27,28. Among these disorders, CDD stands out due to its intricate and diverse clinical presentation, encompassing global developmental delay, intellectual disability, speech impairments, visual and motor skill deficits, sleep disturbances, and GI issues29. Notably, drug-resistant seizures often manifest early and serve as a primary reason for seeking medical attention30, classifying CDD as a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy.
Although GI disturbances are very common among subjects with CDD and subclinical immune dysregulation has been documented3, the relationship between the gut-microbiota-brain axis and CDD has thus far been neglected. In light of these considerations, we conducted a study involving individuals with CDD, as well as their healthy siblings or parents, to investigate the potential connections between alterations in fecal microbiota and the distinct features associated with CDD.
Gut microbiota differences between patients and healthy relatives
The data obtained in our investigation demonstrate that biodiversity in CDD microbiota is reduced with respect to HC. Since richness in bacteria taxa is often associated with a healthy and functional-redundant gut ecosystem, its decrease has been observed in various fields of preclinical and clinical research including inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), and metabolic disorders. Several studies have explored the relationship between alpha diversity and neuropsychiatric conditions such as ASD16,31, however there is still not a clear causal link between alteration in alpha diversity metrics and neurological symptoms. Reduced alpha diversity is a common feature of the gut microbiota in individuals with IBD, which includes conditions like Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. In IBD, the loss of microbial diversity is thought to be linked to chronic inflammation and immune system dysfunction32. In light of this evidence, one might hypothesize that the noted reduction in diversity within our CDD patient group could be linked to GI issues and subclinical immune dysfunction. Additionally, the notion that changes in gut microbiota diversity in association with GI problems may contribute to the worsening of neurological symptoms in CDD, potentially impacting the severity of seizures, is conceivable. Nevertheless, it is crucial to conduct further investigations to validate these hypotheses.
Phylogenetic analysis, as revealed by beta diversity assessment, showed a statistical significant clustering of CDD gut microbiota and their relatives, suggesting differences in microbial composition between these two groups. It is worth noting that CDD patients’ intake of macronutrients and dietary fibers was comparable to that of HC. Thus, we can reasonably exclude the possibility that changes in gut microbiota composition are solely linked to the type of diet consumed by individuals with CDD.
In our previous work on RTT, a disorder sharing several clinical features with CDD, we observed an enrichment in Bacteroidaceae, Clostridium, and Sutterella, and a reduction in Prevotella and Coprococcus5 in RTT compared to HC. Similar findings emerged from a study on a larger RTT cohort by Thapa et al.33. The mean relative abundance of Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, and Clostridium XlVa were higher, while Prevotella and Faecalibacterium were lower in the RTT group compared with the control group.
In the present cohort, compared to healthy relatives, we observed that the main abundant families in CDD were Erysipelotrichaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Veillonellaceae, Coprobacillaceae, Streptococcaceae, and Enterococcaceae. Additionally, we found a significant depletion in CAG-74 (Christensenellales). Interestingly, the relative abundance of these taxa has been reported as a hallmark for drug-resistant epilepsy34, indicating that their presence could be attributed to the specific impact of frequent seizures experienced by subjects with CDD. Collectively, these data suggest a potential link between clinical features of epilepsy in CDD and their fecal microbiota composition.
We also noticed a peculiar increase in the relative abundance of bacterial species characteristic of the oral microbiota in CDD, including Granulicatella adiacens, Streptococcus salivarius and Veillonella parvula. Oral-derived microorganisms have been shown to trigger inflammatory responses, promoting their translocation within the intestinal microenvironment35, creating a potentially harmful vicious cycle36. Intestinal inflammation, as evidenced by recent studies37, has been shown to not only promote the occurrence of seizures but also to influence the responsiveness to anti-seizure medication (ASMs)38. This may underscore a plausible association between refractory epilepsy in CDD and gut inflammation orchestrated by the microbiota.
Beyond oral-derived bacteria, additional changes in the microbiota suggest the presence of inflammatory triggers originating from microbial sources in CDD. For instance, Eggerthella spp, belonging to the phylum Actinobacteria, has been associated with a variety of human inflammatory diseases such as multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis39,40. On the other hand, the CDD gut microbiota is deficient in short chain fatty acids (SCFA)-producing genera such as Eubacterium, Intestinomonas, Gemmiger spp, recently proposed as probiotic species39,41. SCFAs, in particular butyrate, exert a protective role enhancing the integrity of the intestinal barrier and dampening gut inflammation42.
It is important to highlight that in individuals with RTT, there appears to be a dysregulation in the inflammasome response, evidenced by an elevated release of inflammasome components, namely ASC and IL-18, in their serum43. Notably, patients with CDD also exhibit subclinical immune dysregulation3 and subclinical smoldering inflammation4, including increased levels of IL-1beta, a marker of inflammasome activation. Considering the potential pro-inflammatory profile of their gut microbiota, a thorough investigation into inflammasome activation in CDD becomes a pertinent and valuable inquiry for future studies.
Table 2 summarizes the major differences identified in the gut microbiota composition between CDD and HC in the present study, alongside findings from previous studies examining the gut microbiota in patients with RTT.
Simptom severity and gut microbiota in patients with CDD
To better understand the possible contribution of different bacterial taxa in influencing CDD clinical phenotype, we investigated the gut microbiota composition in relation to each symptom severity.
Epilepsy
As a developmental epileptic encephalopathy, the most prominent and presenting feature of CDD is the early onset and refractoriness of seizures, with a median onset at 6 weeks of age in 90% of subjects29,30,44. In CDD, seizures scarcely respond to conventional ASM, increasing patient and caregiver burden.
It has been suggested that intestinal dysbiosis may contribute to the mechanism of drug-resistant epilepsy45. A study published in 2018 reported that people with refractory epilepsy had higher levels of Clostridiales bacteria in their gut microbiome46.
In our investigation, we found a significant enrichment of the families Clostridiaceae, Peptostreptococcaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Christensenecellaceae and Ruminococcaceae, in patients with CDD who experienced daily epileptic seizures. Collinsella, belonging to Coriobacteriaceae, have been shown to correlate with increased intestinal permeability and to induce the expression of IL-17, a cytokine with a recognized role in epileptogenesis40,47. Neuroinflammation is a key player in triggering seizures and in sustaining their occurrence regardless of ASM treatment48. A damaged GI barrier, a common condition promoted by local inflammation, may lead to bacteria-induced cytokines to directly enter the bloodstream, eventually reaching the brain. Moreover, this scenario can favor the leakage of bacterial products, such as lipopolysaccharides and toxic metabolites, which directly promote systemic inflammation49. For instance, clostridia, as spore-forming and toxigenic microorganisms, and Erysipelotrichaceae, widely reported as increased in inflammation-related GI disorders50, may worsen the chronic inflammatory status within the gut, perpetrating the seizure stimulus.
Ambulation
Severe and extensive motor impairment is another common feature in CDD, primarily because hypotonia is an early characteristic in these children. The achievement of gross motor milestones occurs at a slower pace compared to neurotypical subjects. Independent walking is achieved by only 22–23%, the raking grasp by 49% by the age of 5, and the pincer grasp by a mere 13%44.
Regarding the relationship between gut microbiota alterations and motor impairment, previous studies found differences in several genera between children with cerebral palsy and epilepsy (CPE) and healthy controls51. Specifically, the CPE group, sharing features with CDD, showed higher proportions of Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Akkermansia, Enterococcus, Prevotella, Veillonella, Rothia, and Clostridium IV. In contrast, the relative abundance of the genera Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Blautia, Ruminococcus, Roseburia, Anaerostipes, and Parasutterella was notably decreased in those patients. In our group of subjects with CDD, those not walking showed enrichment in the relative abundance of Enterococcaceae, Streptococcaceae and Veillonella. Streptococcus and Veillonella often coexist in the gut niche, probably in cross-feeding and metabolic cooperations and have been demonstrated to induce proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α, contributing to local inflammation52.
GI dysfunction
GI and nutritional issues are prevalent in patients with CDD, with constipation, dysphagia, and GI reflux requiring management in a majority of cases29. GI symptoms may vary not only in time and in intensity but also in the clinical features.
In ASD subjects, the analysis of multiple datasets has revealed that numerous taxa discriminate between subjects affected by constipation or affected by diarrhea. These taxa include members of the Lachnospiraceae family and species of Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus53. In our previous study in a small Italian RTT cohort, we identified an enrichment of the gut microbiome by two genera, Bacteroides and Clostridium5. In an American RTT cohort, the overall pattern of the microbiome revealed a higher relative abundance of Bacteroides spp. and Clostridium spp. and lower relative abundance of Prevotella spp. and Faecalibacterium spp., suggesting a change in the gut bacterial composition towards an inflammatory community potentially responsible for bowel disease33. In this study, the LefSE analysis highlighted an increase in the relative abundance of Lachnoclostridium and Enterobacteriaceae in CDD individuals with the most severe GI symptoms. This finding suggests, once again, that inflammation serves as a mediator of the clinical features within the microbiota and gut homeostasis.
Type of ingested food
Regarding the management of feeding difficulties, individuals with CDD are forced to change their dietary habits, and strategies for facilitating food intake are frequently adopted by caregivers. Indeed, in the enrolled CDD group, 7 out of 17 subjects consumed a smoothie diet. Studies on the gut microbiota have indicated that diet plays a significant role in shaping its composition54. Changes in dietary fiber intake, food processing methods, and food consistency can influence the types and proportions of microorganisms residing in the GI tract. Despite no difference in the diet macronutrient intake, we observed that patients with CDD consuming a blended diet had an increase in Firmicutes, whereas those ingesting food in pieces were characterized by a higher relative abundance in Bacteroidia. These findings are in agreement with a previous study comparing gastrostomy-fed children with blended “homemade” diets and their siblings55.
Sleep problems
Sleep difficulties have often been reported in subjects with CDD, and appear to be more common in CDD than in RTT1,56,57,58. Importantly, sleep disturbances represent a considerable source of concern for caregivers and affect the overall quality of life for individuals with CDD and their families.
In our cohort, most subjects with CDD experienced a sleep problem (76%), in line with the data reported by Mangatt and coworkers describing that, during their lifetime, patients with CDD may show current night waking, sleep breathing disorders, disorders of arousal, sleep–wake transition, and excessive diurnal somnolence56.
To date, only a few studies have explored the gut microbiota alterations in sleep disorder comorbidity in neurodevelopmental disorders. Specifically, investigations in patients with ASD and sleep disorders have found that Faecalibacterium and Agathobacter abundance is reduced with respect to children with ASD without sleep disorders59. Both these genera produce butyrate, which is a SCFA that plays an important role in gut physiology60. The decrease in butyrate and its metabolites may determine an increase in serotonin and a decrease in melatonin, potentially aggravating sleep problems61. Moreover, in a recent study exploring insomnia in patients with major depression, Coprococcus and Intestinibacter were associated with sleep quality, independent of the severity of depression. Coprococcus is a butyrate-producer itself, while Intestinibacter may act via immune inflammatory mechanisms or carbohydrate metabolism62. In our analysis, the fecal microbiota in patients with CDD experiencing sleep disturbances was characterized by a significant enrichment in the family Lachnospiraceae, genus Lachnoclostridium. On the other hand, the microbiota in patients with a normal sleep pattern was enriched in the genera Eubacterium, Bifidobacterium and Blautia which are associated with eubiosis. Bifidobacterium shows SCFA-producing ability, as well as Eubacterium hallii which is a producer of butyrate and propionate, and is able of metabolizing glycerol to 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde (3-HPA), with antimicrobial properties63. Based on our analysis, there appears to be an association between sleep disturbances in patients with CDD and a potential decrease in SCFA-producing bacteria. This observation could pave the way for new intervention strategies, such as targeting the microbiota with probiotic bacteria enriched in SCFA-producing species, to improve both GI abnormalities and sleep quality.
Behavioural features through RSBQ assessment
Finally, to evaluate the contribution of microbial alterations to neurological and behavioral symptoms, we stratified patients based on RSBQ score, a caregiver-completed scale. This questionnaire is among the most extensively utilized neuro-behavioral assessment tools in clinical studies related to RTT, primarily due to its specific focus on the core features of the syndrome64. We categorized patients with CDD as having higher clinical severity when their RSBQ score was > 30 points65.
In our cohort, subjects with CDD with a score over 30 displayed an enrichment in the genus Escherichia, belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family, compared with those with lower scores (< 30). Multiple studies demonstrate the association of this family with dysbiosis in pathological conditions such as IBS66. As a consequence of or a potential promoting factor of GI disturbances, we might speculate that the presence of a low grade-inflammatory microenvironment in CDD gut could favor the blooming of Enterobacteriaceae, further unbalancing intestinal homeostasis67. As the gut and the brain are continuously communicating through the gut-brain axis, an enrichment of potentially dysbiotic bacteria (i.e. Enterobacteriaceae) might interfere with this crosstalk system, leading to worsen neurological outcomes and behavior. Indeed, speculative conclusions about microbiota-dependent modifications in brain function and behavior have been raised, specifically in relation to subjects with ASD. In humans, new data suggests the link between behavioral/neurological symptoms and the gut microbiota in ASD, demonstrating that an alteration of Bacteroides with multiple Bifidobacterium longum subsp longum, swine fecal bacteria SD Pec10, Ruminococcus sp N15MGS 57, and Parabacteroides merdae could be associated to social and emotional/behavioral symptoms68.
In line with the above mentioned data, a plethora of investigations in mouse models have demonstrated the involvement of the gut microbiota in behavioral outcome and brain plasticity69,70,71. Gut bacteria could modulate stress responses72, anxiety-like behavior73, social behavior74,75,76, fear conditioning77, learning and memory78,79. Intriguingly, in ASD rodent models the gut microbiota and some of its metabolites could modulate autistic-like behavior13,15,17. Mechanisms related to specific probiotic action on vagus nerve, hypothalamic oxytocin signaling pathway or the increase in the level of bacteria-derived metabolites have been proposed13,14,15. While these findings in preclinical models offer intriguing insights, it is essential to recognize their preliminary nature, indicating the need for additional research to ascertain their translational relevance in humans.
Conclusion and potential limitations of the study
The microbiota-gut-brain axis has been suggested to play a role in several neurodevelopmental disorders and recent data support its involvement in drug-refractory epilepsy. For the first time, our study sheds light on the potential connection between gut microbiota alterations and the multifaceted CDD phenotype. Microbiota alterations may contribute to the most common disease comorbidities, mainly by promoting a subclinical inflammation state. Indeed, most of the increased/reduced bacterial taxa have a demonstrated role in inducing/attenuating gut inflammation. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms underlying these connections and to develop targeted interventions for improving the wellbeing of individuals with CDD. Finally, as suggested by the specific changes observed in certain bacteria families and genera, intestinal microbes may become a novel biomarker of clinical severity in CDD.
It is important to note that while these findings are promising, further research is necessary to establish the microbiota's validity as a biomarker for CDD. The limitations inherent in this study primarily revolve around the constraints of a modest sample size (n = 17 patients and n = 17 healthy controls). Therefore, to overcome these limitations and enhance the generalizability of our findings beyond our small Italian cohort, future investigations should aim for broader and more diverse participant recruitment. Indeed, the composition of the gut microbiome exhibits considerable variability, even within the confines of a healthy population80. This variability stems from diverse factors such as age and geographic location81, ethnicity82, dietary preferences83, lifestyle84, and environmental influences85. Thus, a longitudinal study involving larger patient cohorts, ideally a multicenter cohort with participants belonging to different ethnicity and countries, and more extensive clinical data will be crucial in confirming these associations and exploring the potential of microbiota-based diagnostics and monitoring tools.
Another potential limitation of the study is that the questionnaire utilized to assess the behavioral profile of patients with CDD has not been specifically designed for this disorder. The RSBQ, in fact, is the instrument predominantly used for describing and rating behavioral features in individuals with RTT64, and it has not been fully validated for CDD. Currently, new evaluation scales specifically tailored for individuals with CDD are under development86 and they have not undergone full validation. It is recommended to apply these scales in larger cohorts before employing them to elucidate the relationship between clinical features and the gut microbiota profile.
In conclusion, the approach proposed in our study could have a transformative impact on the diagnosis and management of CDD, offering new insights into its pathophysiology and potential therapeutic interventions.
Methods
Cohort recruitment
In collaboration with the Italian Association of CDKL5 families ("Insieme verso la cura"), we recruited individuals who had been diagnosed with CDKL5 disorder and had a confirmed pathogenic variant in the CDKL5 gene. As a control group, we included healthy siblings or parents (for only child) of the affected individuals, who were not currently taking any medications. We excluded individuals who had used antibiotics or probiotics within the three months prior to the study.
At the enrollment, caregivers were asked to fill a 3-day dietary survey. The diary included three consecutive days, one of which was during the weekend. Dietary food records were processed using a commercially available software (MètaDieta, METEDA srl, Italy). Anthropometric evaluation completed the nutritional survey.
CDD patients underwent a thorough characterization process, which involved comprehensive clinical evaluations. This evaluation encompassed a detailed examination of their medical history and physical condition, including an assessment of neurological and behavioral features, as well as the identification of any comorbidity. The overall clinical assessment was measured by the Rett Syndrome Behavioral Questionnaire (RSBQ)87, considered specific for CDD and RTT syndromes. Additionally, a GI assessment was conducted to gather information about the individual's GI health. GI discomfort was evaluated by the Gastrointestinal Severity Index (GISI)22, and stool transition time was estimated by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS, Lewis and Heaton, 1997).
Epilepsy data were also recorded, in particular age at seizure onset, seizure characteristics at onset and at follow-up, anti-seizure medication history and current treatment. Seizure frequency at the time of the study was recorded using seizure diaries.
As proposed by ILAE, we considered drug resistance as the failure of adequate trials of two tolerated and appropriately chosen and used AED schedules (either as monotherapies or in combination) to achieve sustained seizure freedom.88.
Fecal DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing
Bacterial DNA was extracted from fecal samples using the QIAamp Powerfecal DNA kit (Qiagen, Germany), and its concentration was quantified by Qubit® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, WA).
The 16S rRNA sequencing and analysis was performed in service by Zymo Research (Germany). Briefly, DNA samples were prepared for targeted sequencing with the Quick-16S™ NGS Library Prep Kit (Zymo Research) and the Quick-16S™ Primer Set V3-V4 (Zymo Research). The sequencing library was prepared using an innovative library preparation process in which PCR reactions were performed in real-time PCR machines to control cycles and therefore limit PCR chimera formation. The final PCR products were quantified with qPCR fluorescence readings and pooled together based on equal molarity. The final pooled library was cleaned up with the Select-a-Size DNA Clean & Concentrator™, then quantified with TapeStation® (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and Qubit® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, WA).
The ZymoBIOMICS® Microbial Community DNA Standard (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) was used as a positive control for each targeted library preparation. Negative controls (i.e., blank library preparation control) were included to assess the level of bioburden carried by the wet-lab process.
The final library was sequenced on Illumina® MiSeq™ with a v3 reagent kit (600 cycles). The sequencing was performed with 10% PhiX spike-in.
Bioinformatics analysis
Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified from 16S paired‐end sequencing using the Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm (DADA2) pipeline, including filtering and trimming of the reads (version 1.16.0)89. Reads per sample were trimmed to 10,900 reads in order to compensate for the sequencing unevenness of the samples and to provide a consistent minimum amount for the downstream analysis, carried out through the “phyloseq” package (version 1.34.0)90. Alpha‐diversity evaluation was performed according to several microbial diversity metrics (i.e., chao1, Shannon Index, observed species). Beta‐diversity analysis was conducted using unweighted Unifrac metrics91 and through the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA).
Taxonomy was assigned to the ASVs using the 8‐mer‐based classifier from the 11.5 release of the RDP database92 and using the GTDB 16S rRNA database (release r207)93. In the analysis of the gut microbiota in CDD patients based on clinical features, taxonomies that have significant abundance among different groups were identified by LEfSe21 using default settings.
Statistical analysis
Comparisons were performed using Prism software version 7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) or Python.
Alpha-diversity between CDD and HC groups, or intra CDD groups based, was tested through Mann–Whitney U-test.
Beta-diversity: to test whether two groups of samples were significantly different, analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) or permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) were calculated using the Python library scikit-bio (http://scikit-bio.org/).
For evaluating differences in relative abundances of bacterial groups (Families and Genera) between CDD and HC, a Wilcoxon test was performed.
Due to the small number of samples (17 CDD vs 17 HC), no correction methods have been applied. N’s represent single subjects unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance was defined in the figure panels as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Ethics approval
The study has been approved by the Ethic Committee of ASST Santi Paolo Carlo Hospital, Milano, Italy (2021/EM/317), and conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.
Data availability
16S rRNA-seq data are publicly available at Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10523000.
References
Jakimiec, M., Paprocka, J. & Śmigiel, R. CDKL5 Deficiency disorder—A complex epileptic encephalopathy. Brain Sci. 10, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10020107 (2020).
Mangatt, M. et al. Prevalence and onset of comorbidities in the CDKL5 disorder differ from Rett syndrome. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 11, 39 (2016).
Leoncini, S. et al. Cytokine dysregulation in MECP2- and CDKL5-related rett syndrome: Relationships with aberrant redox homeostasis, inflammation, and ω-3 PUFAs. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 421624 (2015).
Cortelazzo, A. et al. Inflammatory protein response in CDKL5-Rett syndrome: Evidence of a subclinical smouldering inflammation. Inflamm. Res. 66, 269–280 (2017).
Borghi, E. et al. Rett syndrome: A focus on gut microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, (2017).
Strati, F. et al. Altered gut microbiota in Rett syndrome. Microbiome 4, 41 (2016).
Tognini, P., Thaiss, C. A., Elinav, E. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Circadian coordination of antimicrobial responses. Cell Host Microbe 22, 185–192 (2017).
Damiani, F., Cornuti, S. & Tognini, P. The gut-brain connection: Exploring the influence of the gut microbiota on neuroplasticity and neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuropharmacology 231, 109491 (2023).
Morais, L. H., Schreiber, H. L. 4th. & Mazmanian, S. K. The gut microbiota-brain axis in behaviour and brain disorders. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 241–255 (2021).
Tognini, P. Gut microbiota: A potential regulator of neurodevelopment. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 11, 25 (2017).
Cryan, J. F., O’Riordan, K. J., Sandhu, K., Peterson, V. & Dinan, T. G. The gut microbiome in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 19, 179–194 (2020).
Sharon, G., Sampson, T. R., Geschwind, D. H. & Mazmanian, S. K. The central nervous system and the gut microbiome. Cell 167, 915–932 (2016).
Sgritta, M. et al. Mechanisms underlying microbial-mediated changes in social behavior in mouse models of autism spectrum disorder. Neuron 101, 246-259.e6 (2019).
Hsiao, E. Y. et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 155, 1451–1463 (2013).
Buffington, S. A. et al. Microbial reconstitution reverses maternal diet-induced social and synaptic deficits in offspring. Cell 165, 1762–1775 (2016).
Korteniemi, J., Karlsson, L. & Aatsinki, A. Systematic review: Autism spectrum disorder and the gut microbiota. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 148, 242–254 (2023).
Sharon, G. et al. Human gut microbiota from autism spectrum disorder promote behavioral symptoms in mice. Cell 177, 1600-1618.e17 (2019).
Zmora, N., Suez, J. & Elinav, E. You are what you eat: Diet, health and the gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 35–56 (2018).
Parks, D. H. et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 996–1004 (2018).
Waters, J. L. & Ley, R. E. The human gut bacteria Christensenellaceae are widespread, heritable, and associated with health. BMC Biol. 17, 83 (2019).
Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60 (2011).
Thulasi, V., Steer, R. A., Monteiro, I. M. & Ming, X. Overall severities of gastrointestinal symptoms in pediatric outpatients with and without autism spectrum disorder. Autism 23, 524–530 (2019).
Shin, N.-R., Whon, T. W. & Bae, J.-W. Proteobacteria: microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 33, 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.011 (2015).
Li, Q. et al. Obstructive sleep apnea is related to alterations in fecal microbiome and impaired intestinal barrier function. Sci. Rep. 13, 778 (2023).
Magzal, F. et al. Increased physical activity improves gut microbiota composition and reduces short-chain fatty acid concentrations in older adults with insomnia. Sci. Rep. 12, 2265 (2022).
Shimizu, Y. et al. Shorter sleep time relates to lower human defensin 5 secretion and compositional disturbance of the intestinal microbiota accompanied by decreased short-chain fatty acid production. Gut Microbes 15, 2190306 (2023).
Borghi, E. & Vignoli, A. Rett syndrome and other neurodevelopmental disorders share common changes in gut microbial community: A descriptive review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, (2019).
Holmes, M. et al. Cross talk between drug-resistant epilepsy and the gut microbiome. Epilepsia 61, 2619–2628 (2020).
Amin, S. et al. International consensus recommendations for the assessment and management of individuals with CDKL5 deficiency disorder. Front. Neurol. 13, 874695 (2022).
Leonard, H. et al. CDKL5 deficiency disorder: Clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 21, 563–576 (2022).
Li, Z. et al. Differences in alpha diversity of gut microbiota in neurological diseases. Front. Neurosci. 16, 879318 (2022).
Abdel-Rahman, L. I. H. & Morgan, X. C. Searching for a consensus among inflammatory bowel disease studies: A systematic meta-analysis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 29, 125–139 (2023).
Thapa, S. et al. Assessment of the gut bacterial microbiome and metabolome of girls and women with Rett Syndrome. PLoS One 16, e0251231 (2021).
Xie, G. et al. Ketogenic diet poses a significant effect on imbalanced gut microbiota in infants with refractory epilepsy. World J. Gastroenterol. 23, 6164–6171 (2017).
Lu, Y., Li, Z. & Peng, X. Regulatory effects of oral microbe on intestinal microbiota and the illness. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13, 1093967 (2023).
Hindson, J. Colonization of the inflamed intestine by an oral bacterium. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 19, 751–751 (2022).
De Caro, C. et al. Intestinal inflammation increases convulsant activity and reduces antiepileptic drug efficacy in a mouse model of epilepsy. Sci. Rep. 9, 13983 (2019).
Riazi, K., Galic, M. A. & Pittman, Q. J. Contributions of peripheral inflammation to seizure susceptibility: Cytokines and brain excitability. Epilepsy Res. 89, 34–42 (2010).
Forbes, J. D. et al. A comparative study of the gut microbiota in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases—does a common dysbiosis exist?. Microbiome 6, 1–15 (2018).
Maciel-Fiuza, M. F. et al. Role of gut microbiota in infectious and inflammatory diseases. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1098386 (2023).
Seegers, J. F. M., Bui, T. P. N. & de Vos, W. M. Remarkable metabolic versatility of the commensal bacteria Eubacterium hallii and Intestinimonas butyriciproducens: Potential next-generation therapeutic microbes. Probiotic Bacteria and Postbiotic Metabolites: Role in Animal and Human Health 139–151 (2021).
Viladomiu, M., Hontecillas, R., Yuan, L., Lu, P. & Bassaganya-Riera, J. Nutritional protective mechanisms against gut inflammation. J. Nutr. Biochem. 24, 929–939 (2013).
Pecorelli, A. et al. Altered inflammasome machinery as a key player in the perpetuation of Rett syndrome oxinflammation. Redox. Biol. 28, 101334 (2020).
Olson, H. E. et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 deficiency disorder: Clinical review. Pediatr. Neurol. 97, 18–25 (2019).
Wu, J. et al. Intestinal microbiota as an alternative therapeutic target for epilepsy. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 9032809 (2016).
Zhang, Y. et al. Altered gut microbiome composition in children with refractory epilepsy after ketogenic diet. Epilepsy Res. 145, 163–168 (2018).
Zhou, C. et al. Changes and significance of gut microbiota in children with focal epilepsy before and after treatment. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12, 965471 (2022).
Vitaliti, G. et al. Molecular mechanism involved in the pathogenesis of early-onset epileptic encephalopathy. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 12, 118 (2019).
Bairamian, D. et al. Microbiota in neuroinflammation and synaptic dysfunction: A focus on Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 17, 19 (2022).
Kaakoush, N. O. Insights into the role of erysipelotrichaceae in the human host. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 5, 84 (2015).
Huang, C. et al. Distinct gut microbiota composition and functional category in children with cerebral palsy and epilepsy. Front. Pediatr. 7, 394 (2019).
van den Bogert, B., Meijerink, M., Zoetendal, E. G., Wells, J. M. & Kleerebezem, M. Immunomodulatory properties of Streptococcus and Veillonella isolates from the human small intestine microbiota. PLoS One 9, e114277 (2014).
West, K. A. et al. Multi-angle meta-analysis of the gut microbiome in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A step toward understanding patient subgroups. Sci. Rep. 12, 17034 (2022).
Singh, R. K. et al. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J. Transl. Med. 15, 73 (2017).
Marchesi, J. R. et al. An observational investigation of the faecal microbiota and metabonome of gastrostomy fed children, on blended and formula diets. Gut Microbes https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2022.2138661 (2022).
Mangatt, M. et al. Prevalence and onset of comorbidities in the CDKL5 disorder differ from Rett syndrome. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 11, 39 (2016).
Melikishvili, G. et al. Epileptic spasms with terror during sleep in CDKL5 encephalopathy. Sleep Adv. 3, zpac010 (2022).
Fehr, S. et al. The CDKL5 disorder is an independent clinical entity associated with early-onset encephalopathy. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 21, 266–273 (2013).
Hua, X. et al. The gut microbiota and associated metabolites are altered in sleep disorder of children with autism spectrum disorders. Front. Psychiatry 11, 855 (2020).
Hodgkinson, K. et al. Butyrate’s role in human health and the current progress towards its clinical application to treat gastrointestinal disease. Clin. Nutr. 42, 61–75 (2023).
Neroni, B. et al. Relationship between sleep disorders and gut dysbiosis: What affects what?. Sleep Med. 87, 1–7 (2021).
Zhang, Q. et al. Gut microbiome composition associated with major depressive disorder and sleep quality. Front. Psychiatry 12, 645045 (2021).
Engels, C., Ruscheweyh, H.-J., Beerenwinkel, N., Lacroix, C. & Schwab, C. The common gut microbe Eubacterium hallii also contributes to intestinal propionate formation. Front. Microbiol. 7, 713 (2016).
Percy, A. K., Neul, J. L., Benke, T. A., Marsh, E. D. & Glaze, D. G. A review of the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire and its utilization in the assessment of symptoms associated with Rett syndrome. Front. Pediatr. 11, 1229553 (2023).
Cianfaglione, R. et al. A national survey of Rett syndrome: Behavioural characteristics. J. Neurodev. Disord. 7, 11 (2015).
Baldelli, V., Scaldaferri, F., Putignani, L. & Del Chierico, F. The role of enterobacteriaceae in gut microbiota dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel diseases. Microorganisms 9, 1 (2021).
Zeng, M. Y., Inohara, N. & Nuñez, G. Mechanisms of inflammation-driven bacterial dysbiosis in the gut. Mucosal. Immunol. 10, 18–26 (2017).
Altered gut microbiota correlates with behavioral problems but not gastrointestinal symptoms in individuals with autism. Brain Behav. Immun. 106, 161–178 (2022).
Lupori, L. et al. The gut microbiota of environmentally enriched mice regulates visual cortical plasticity. Cell Rep. 38, 110212 (2022).
Cryan, J. F. & Dinan, T. G. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 701–712 (2012).
Cryan, J. F. et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol. Rev. 99, 1877–2013 (2019).
Sudo, N. et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J. Physiol. 558, 263–275 (2004).
Neufeld, K. M., Kang, N., Bienenstock, J. & Foster, J. A. Reduced anxiety-like behavior and central neurochemical change in germ-free mice. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 23, 255–64, e119 (2011).
Wu, W.-L. et al. Microbiota regulate social behaviour via stress response neurons in the brain. Nature 595, 409–414 (2021).
Desbonnet, L., Clarke, G., Shanahan, F., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 146–148 (2014).
Sherwin, E., Bordenstein, S. R., Quinn, J. L., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota and the social brain. Science 366, (2019).
Chu, C. et al. The microbiota regulate neuronal function and fear extinction learning. Nature 574, 543–548 (2019).
Kuijer, E. J. & Steenbergen, L. The microbiota-gut-brain axis in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory: Current state and future challenges. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 152, 105296 (2023).
Alemohammad, S. M. A., Noori, S. M. R., Samarbafzadeh, E. & Noori, S. M. A. The role of the gut microbiota and nutrition on spatial learning and spatial memory: A mini review based on animal studies. Mol. Biol. Rep. 49, 1551–1563 (2022).
Falony, G. et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science 352, 560–564 (2016).
Yatsunenko, T. et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486, 222–227 (2012).
Dwiyanto, J. et al. Ethnicity influences the gut microbiota of individuals sharing a geographical location: A cross-sectional study from a middle-income country. Sci. Rep. 11, 2618 (2021).
Power, S. E., O’Toole, P. W., Stanton, C., Ross, R. P. & Fitzgerald, G. F. Intestinal microbiota, diet and health. Br. J. Nutr. 111, 387–402 (2014).
Aya, V., Flórez, A., Perez, L. & Ramírez, J. D. Association between physical activity and changes in intestinal microbiota composition: A systematic review. PLoS One 16, e0247039 (2021).
Karl, J. P. et al. Effects of psychological, environmental and physical stressors on the gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2013 (2018).
Saldaris, J. et al. Content validation of clinician-reported items for a severity measure for CDKL5 deficiency disorder. J. Child Neurol. 36, 998–1006 (2021).
Mount, R. H., Charman, T., Hastings, R. P., Reilly, S. & Cass, H. The Rett syndrome behaviour questionnaire (RSBQ): Refining the behavioural phenotype of Rett syndrome. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 43, 1099–1110 (2002).
Kwan, P. et al. Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc task force of the ILAE commission on therapeutic strategies. Epilepsia 51, 1069–1077 (2010).
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8, e61217 (2013).
Lozupone, C., Lladser, M. E., Knights, D., Stombaugh, J. & Knight, R. UniFrac: An effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J. 5, 169–172 (2011).
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007).
Parks, D. H. et al. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D785–D794 (2022).
Acknowledgements
The authors are extremely thankful to the families and the children of the association “ CDKL5 Insieme verso la cura'' for their participation and support in the study. We thank Prof. Tommaso Pizzorusso (Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa) for his critical insights on the manuscript and figures. We thank Dr. Raffaele Mazziotti (University of Florence, Italy) for his help with statistics. Special thanks to Andrea Tognozzi and to all the members of Tognini’s Lab for comments on figure style.
Funding
This research was supported by Telethon Grant GSP21001 to PT, AV and EB. PT was in part supported by NextGenerationEU Italian Ministry of University and Research M4.C2 -PNRR YOUNG MSCA_0000081 iNsPIReD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EB, PT and AV designed the study. IV and AV performed subject enrollment and AV analyzed clinical data. OX and EO carried out the sample collection and experiments. EO performed diet analysis. CC, EB, and PT analyzed, and interpreted the data. EB and PT prepared the figures. EB, PT and AV wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Borghi, E., Xynomilakis, O., Ottaviano, E. et al. Gut microbiota profile in CDKL5 deficiency disorder patients. Sci Rep 14, 7376 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56989-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56989-0
Keywords
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.