Abstract
The aim of this two-center randomized controlled trial was to assess the outcomes and relative factors associated with pulpotomies performed using a premixed injectable calcium silicate cement, as compared to mineral trioxide aggregate in mature permanent premolar and molar teeth with reversible pulpitis. Included teeth were randomly divided into two groups according to pulpotomy material (ProRoot MTA [PMTA] group, Endocem MTA Premixed [EPM] group). After pulp exposure, the superficial pulp was either removed to a depth of 2 mm (partial pulpotomy) or completely amputated to the level of the root canal orifice (full pulpotomy). A 3-mm layer of either material was randomly placed over the pulp wound, followed by the application of a thin layer of a light-cured glass ionomer composite liner. The restoration procedure was then carried out during the same visit. After one year of treatment, the pulpotomy success rate was 94.4% (67/71), with no significant difference between the PMTA and EPM groups. The success rate was 93.9% in the PMTA group and 97.1% in the EPM group. There were no significant factors related to the procedures. EPM is a viable alternative to PMTA for single-visit pulpotomies of permanent premolars and molars.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
When treating pulp exposure, root canal therapy (RCT) destroys the tooth structure through access opening and canal enlargement. In contrast, vital pulp therapy (VPT) avoids excessive loss of tooth structure and preserves the vital pulp, thereby maintaining the tooth's defensive properties1. Being a more conservative and predictable approach for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure2,3,4, VPT (especially partial and full pulpotomy) is more beneficial than proceeding with RCT to preserve tooth structure and extend tooth longevity5,6,7,8.
Hydraulic calcium silicate cements, such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), are recommended as the gold standard materials for VPT of exposed pulp because they have demonstrated reliable results in histological9,10 and clinical studies11,12,13,14,15. However, MTA has several disadvantages, such as coronal discoloration16,17, prolonged setting time18 and poor handling characteristics19,20, which hinder the completion of VPT and restoration during a single visit. In some clinical trials, a moist cotton pellet and an interim restoration were placed on unset MTA material, and the final restoration was placed at a subsequent visit21,22,23. In another clinical study, a moist cotton pellet was placed over the MTA for 45 min to achieve the optimal physical properties of MTA24, and the RMGI (Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer) base was adapted25 to complete the restoration procedure at the same visit26.
Calcium silicate cement products have been developed to reduce the setting time and improve handling. Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-fossés, France) is manufactured as a capsule containing material and liquid that is triturated by a mixer on demand. It sets within 6.5–45 min and is easy to handle, with a clay-like texture after mixing. Premixed products such as Endosequence BC RRM Fast Set Putty (EndoSequence; Brasseler, Savannah, GA, USA) and iRoot BP Plus (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, Canada) are ready-to-use calcium silicate cements that are set for 20 min to 2 h after contact with a moist environment. Calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cements have been also widely used because of their biocompatibility and adequate properties27. Theracal LC (ThLC; Bisco, Schaumberg, IL, USA) is a light-cured resin-modified calcium silicate liner for pulp capping that sets immediately upon light curing. Recent clinical studies have used these materials to perform VPT and restorative procedures in a single visit with favourable results28,29.
The recently developed Endocem MTA Premixed (EPM) (Maruchi, Wonju, Korea), a premixed injectable calcium silicate cement with a flowable consistency, contains zirconium dioxide as a radiopacifier instead of bismuth oxide and sets faster than ProRoot MTA (PMTA) (WMTA; Dentsply Tulsa, OK, USA)30. Its flowability allows direct delivery from the syringe to the target site. Despite its potential advantages, it has not been tested in clinical trials. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and outcomes of pulpotomy using EPM and compare them with pulpotomy using PMTA. The null hypothesis is that the outcome of pulpotomy with EPM does not differ from those of pulpotomy with PMTA.
Methods
Study design and population
This was a two-center randomized controlled trial of pulpotomy in permanent premolars and molars using PMTA and EPM. The appropriate independent ethics committees of Yonsei University Dental Hospital (YUDH) (IRB No. 2-2019-0038) and National Health Insurance Ilsan Hospital (NHIIH) (IRB No. NHIMC 2020-06-052-019) approved the study protocol, and all experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The clinical trial was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (Reg. No.: KCT0005734, 01/04/2021). We enrolled systematically healthy patients aged 11–82 years between January and October 2021.
Mature permanent premolar and molar teeth with reversible pulpitis were included: (1) no history of spontaneous pain; (2) a positive response to the cold test went away in less than 3–5 s; (3) negative responses to palpation and percussion; (4) a periapical index score ≤ 2 on the periapical radiograph31; (5) pulp exposure during caries removal or as a result of recent trauma; and (6) a healthy periodontium based on probing pocket depth ≤ 3 mm and mobility within normal limits. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) non-restorable crowns; (2) immature roots; (3) root resorption or pulp calcification; and (4) inability to control bleeding within 5 min after pulp exposure.
Patients who met the eligibility criteria were informed of the procedure, associated risks and benefits, and alternative treatment options. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before enrolment.
Hypothesis, sample-size determination and randomisation
All investigators and participants were blinded to the patient allocation. After this step, both (investigators and patients) were not blinded to materials due to the different consistency and manipulation. We postulated that pulpotomy using EPM would not be inferior to pulpotomy using PMTA. The average success rate of pulpotomy with calcium hydroxide is 20% lower than that of pulpotomy with hydraulic silicate cement, whereas the success rate of the control group is generally considered to be > 90%. Therefore, we set the non-inferiority margin at a success rate of 50–75% of − 20%, which is − 15–10%. Furthermore, 50 patients per treatment group were estimated to provide 80% power to detect a non-inferiority margin of − 0.12 with a one-sided α of 0.05, assuming a dropout rate of 20%.
A clinical coordinator blinded to the study objectives generated a computer-generated list of random numbers using the Sealed Envelope website (https://www.sealedenvelope.com/) in phase 1 allocation using random block sizes of 6. The clinical coordinator assigned the affected permanent teeth to one of two groups: PMTA or EPM (Fig. 1).
Treatment procedure
Six dentists, including five postgraduate residents and one faculty member from YUDH, one postgraduate resident, and one faculty member from NHIIH performed the procedures.
Local anesthesia was induced using 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (Huons, Sungnam, Korea), and caries removal was performed under rubber dam isolation (Figs. 2a,b, 3a,b). After pulp exposure, 2–3 mm of the pulp was removed to a depth of 2 mm using a sterile high-speed round-tapered diamond bur (Komet Dental, Lemgo, Germany) with copious irrigation (partial pulpotomy; Figs. 2c, 3c). If hemostasis was not achieved within 5 min, the pulp tissue was amputated to the level of the root canal orifice (full pulpotomy). The cavity was thoroughly irrigated using 2.5% NaOCl to remove superficial necrotic tissue for hemostasis32. After hemostasis was achieved, a randomly selected calcium silicate material was applied. In the PMTA group, the MTA was freshly mixed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and gently placed over the pulp wound and surrounding dentin to a thickness of 3 mm (Fig. 2d), whereas in the EPM group, the material was injected into the target area using a 19-gauge needle with a thickness of 3 mm (Fig. 3d). A moist cotton pellet was then placed to ensure the setting of both materials and removed after 5 min. A thin layer of light-cured glass ionomer composite liner (Ionoseal, VOCO, Germany) was applied and light-cured for 20 s. The cavity was restored using composite restoration at the same visit (Figs. 2e, 3e). If prosthetic restoration was required, it was started at the same or next visit (Figs. 2f, 3f). Immediate postoperative periapical radiographs were obtained.
Postoperative evaluation
Participants were recalled at 3, 6, and 12 months after the pulpotomy, and radiographic and clinical examinations of the treated teeth were performed in each hospital. The all practitioners performed clinical examinations, but they did not only examine their own cases, but also randomly examined the cases of other practitioners. The clinical examinations included the presence or absence of pain (spontaneous or on percussion, biting, or palpation); swelling; sinus tracts; and other symptoms. Information about the materials was blinded to the examiners until the end of the study as it was not written in the medical record. Radiographic examinations included the detection of periapical radiolucency and evidence of pathological root resorption and calcific bridge formation, except in cases of crown restoration. Two operators who were not involved in this study and blinded to the type of MTA performed the radiographic analyses. They were given case numbers and radiographs to analyze, with no information about the patient or materials used. Where there was disagreement, the radiographs were re-evaluated until consensus was reached. Interexaminer reliability was determined with Cohen kappa statistics in accordance with Landis and Koch33. Pulpotomy success was determined based on the absence of clinical and radiographic signs and symptoms. Clearly visible calcific bridge formation on periapical radiographs was considered a successful calcific bridge formation, whereas its absence was considered a failure of calcific bridge formation.
Statistical analysis
The chi-square test was used to assess the homogeneity of baseline characteristics between the two groups. The relationships between possible explanatory variables, treatment success, and calcific bridge formation were analyzed using logistic regression. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 29.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
The interexaminer reliability for periapical radiolucency and calcific bridge formation was 0.869 and 0.629, indicating good and moderate agreement, respectively. A total of 87 teeth were enrolled, including 64 from the YUDH and 23 from the NHIIH. Four patients (four teeth) refused to participate after the allocated procedure, and 83 teeth were finally included. The four patients withdrew from the study regardless of the allocation because the allocated material was not explained to them. Five teeth, including two with secondary caries, one with trauma, one with a root fracture, and one with extraction due to orthodontic treatment, were excluded during follow-up. Seven patients were lost during the follow-up. Finally, 71 teeth, including 37 in the PMTA group and 34 in the EPM group, were clinically and radiographically evaluated at one year (91% recall rate) (Fig. 1). The chi-square test showed that the demographic and clinical variables were similarly distributed among the experimental groups (Table 1; p = 0.07–1.00).
Four clinical failures were noted within six months of treatment (Table 2). At 1 year follow-up, no patients showed clinical or radiographic signs or symptoms of failure. Therefore, the overall pulpotomy success rate was 94.4% (67/71); 93.9% in the PMTA and 97.1% in EPM with no significant difference between the groups. Full and partial pulpotomies were performed in 17 (overall success rate 94.1%) and 54 teeth (overall success rate 94.4%), respectively. The site of exposure was analyzed only in cases of partial pulpotomy. The success rates for the occlusal and axial exposures were 91.7% and 95.2%, respectively. No significant variables were associated with treatment success (Table 3).
Owing to extracoronal restoration, it was not possible to assess calcific bridge formation in four cases, including two in the PMTA group and two in the EPM group. Calcific bridge formation occurred in 6 (24.0%) cases of 25 partial pulpotomy cases in the PMTA group and 10 (40.0%) cases of 25 partial pulpotomy cases in the EPM group (Table 3, Fig. 4). The odds of calcified bridge formation were approximately two times higher in the under-21 age, mandibular teeth, and occlusal exposure groups than in other groups. None of the independent variables significantly affected calcific bridge formation after partial pulpotomy (Table 3).
Discussion
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and outcome of pulpotomy using a premixed injectable calcium silicate cement with a flowable consistency, EPM, and compare it with pulpotomy using PMTA. The outcome of pulpotomy with EPM was not significantly different with those of pulpotomy with PMTA, therefore, the null hypothesis was not rejected. This study provides insights into the clinical efficacy and handling of this new type of calcium silicate cement. If proven as effective as PMTA, EPM could provide a more convenient and efficient alternative for VPT and restorative procedures. Overall, our study contributes to the ongoing efforts to improve and refine VPT techniques and materials for managing exposed pulp.
In the present study, partial pulpotomy was performed during a single visit. After applying the MTA cement, the cement was covered with RMGI to continue the restorative procedure. This is different from the traditional method of placing a wet cotton pellet over the MTA and temporary restoration to ensure the complete setting of the MTA cement21,22,23. One-sided hydration of the pulp is sufficient for the MTA setting34, and glass ionomer cement restoration over MTA does not affect the MTA setting24. Therefore, recent studies on single-visit pulpotomies have placed glass ionomer cement over MTA cement26,28,29.
The study reported an overall success rate of 94.4%, which is considered excellent for pulpotomies. The success rate was assessed based on clinical and radiographic criteria, and the results were evaluated at six months and one year after treatment, as recommended in the position statement35. Although a 1-year observation period may be limited in terms of the reliability of a clinical trial, it is sufficient to assess the validity of the materials used as in our study, all failures occurred within 6 months (Table 2). The success rate in this study was higher than that reported in recent pulpotomy studies using traditional MTA and newer calcium silicate cements over the same observation period23,26,28,29,36,37. This may be because the recent pulpotomy studies included teeth with irreversible pulpitis, whereas this study included teeth with normal pulp or reversible pulpitis. Therefore, a direct comparison is not appropriate; however, we believe that the results of this study are sufficient to demonstrate the feasibility of the new material for pulpotomy.
This study found no statistically significant differences in success rates between the two materials used; MTA and calcium silicate cement showed similar clinical and radiographic results. This suggests that calcium silicate cement with a flowable consistency can be used as an alternative to MTA for pulpotomy procedures with comparable efficacy. Although EPM has a faster initial setting time than PMTA, and Palma et al.38 suggested that all of the calcium silicate-based cements tested allow restorative procedures to be performed after initial setting, allowing the treatment to be completed in a single appointment, the effects of etching and bonding agents on EPM have not yet been verified. Therefore, the protocol for the application of RMGI over the cements was performed in our study, similar to other single-visit studies26,28,29.
The success rate of a pulpotomy is influenced by several factors, including the extent of pulpitis, tooth maturity, and restoration quality after the procedure; these factors should be considered when selecting the material and technique for pulpotomy to ensure the best possible outcome. In our study, we analysed several factors, including age, sex, tooth type for overall pulpotomy and exposure site for partial pulpotomy; however, no significant factors were identified (Table 3). Other recent pulpotomy studies have failed to identify significant factors23,26,28,29,37,39. Even the exposure site, which was a significant factor in a previous direct pulp-capping study12, was not a significant factor in recent partial pulpotomy studies26,40. This is likely due to the improved biocompatibility and sealing ability of the materials. The cavity-forming nature of the pulpotomy procedure resulted in accurate filling of the materials, reducing the influence of factors other than the pulp condition on the procedure.
A calcific bridge is a structure formed within the dental pulp tissue in response to injury or trauma and acts as a barrier between the healthy pulp tissue and the external environment, protecting the pulp tissue from further injury or infection. In this study, calcified bridges were found in 32% (16/50) of the teeth with a partial pulpotomy, which is higher than in other studies that have evaluated calcified bridges23,29; however, we were unable to determine the reason for these differences, as each study did not provide their evaluation criteria for calcified bridges. Calcific bridges were found more frequently in younger patients with EPM rather than PMTA and with occlusal exposure rather than axial exposure, although these were not statistically significant.
The teeth included in this study had pulp exposure either during caries removal or as a result of recent trauma. In addition, there was no history of spontaneous pain and lingering pain to cold test. Thus, the preoperative condition of the pulp was diagnosed as reversible pulpitis. Recently, Santos et al.41 suggested that the radiographic and histologic results of full pulpotomy are not compromised by short-term preoperative pulp inflammation. This suggests that full pulpotomy may be effective for teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Further research is needed on this issue.
Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. First, eight practitioners participated in this study, and differences in skills may have influenced the results. All eight practitioners are from the same hospital and have the same concept of the procedure. Before starting the study, all the practitioners had a meeting to standardize the diagnostic criteria and procedures. Nevertheless, the participation of multiple practitioners is a limitation of this study. Second, the observation period in this study was only one year, which is not long enough to observe bacterial microleakage or long-term pulpal response. Third, this study did not fulfill the required sample size because of the limited time for patient recruitment. Fourth, periapical radiographs were used to assess the calcific bridge formation, although bitewing radiography and cone-beam computed tomography were more accurate. Fifth, when the hemostasis was not achieved within 5 min in this study, we performed the full pulpotomy instead of partial pulpotomy. Although Careddu and Duncan argued that bleeding time is not a significant factor in treatment success, we performed full pulpotomy for the convenience of the procedure rather than focusing on the success rate.
Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into the use of premixed injectable calcium silicate cement with a flowable consistency as a potential alternative to MTA cement for pulpotomies.
Data availability
The data included in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Lin, L. M., Ricucci, D., Saoud, T. M., Sigurdsson, A. & Kahler, B. Vital pulp therapy of mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis from the perspective of pulp biology. Aust. Endod J. 46, 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12392 (2020).
Leong, D. J. X. & Yap, A. U. Vital pulp therapy in carious pulp-exposed permanent teeth: An umbrella review. Clin. Oral Investig. 25, 6743–6756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03960-2 (2021).
Eggmann, F. et al. Partial pulpotomy without age restriction: A retrospective assessment of permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure. Clin. Oral Investig. 26, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04007-2 (2022).
Ather, A., Patel, B., Gelfond, J. A. L. & Ruparel, N. B. Outcome of pulpotomy in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 12, 19664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20918-w (2022).
Randow, K. & Glantz, P. O. On cantilever loading of vital and non-vital teeth. An experimental clinical study. Acta Odontol. Scand. 44, 271–277. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358609004733 (1986).
Caplan, D. J., Cai, J., Yin, G. & White, B. A. Root canal filled versus non-root canal filled teeth: A retrospective comparison of survival times. J. Public Health Dent. 65, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2005.tb02792.x (2005).
Asgary, S. et al. Outcomes of root canal therapy or full pulpotomy using two endodontic biomaterials in mature permanent teeth: A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 26, 3287–3297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04310-y (2022).
Zhang, M. et al. Factors affecting the outcome of full pulpotomy in permanent posterior teeth diagnosed with reversible or irreversible pulpitis. Sci. Rep. 12, 20280. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24815-0 (2022).
Aeinehchi, M., Eslami, B., Ghanbariha, M. & Saffar, A. S. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium hydroxide as pulp-capping agents in human teeth: A preliminary report. Int. Endod. J. 36, 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00652.x (2003).
Nair, P. N., Duncan, H. F., Pitt Ford, T. R. & Luder, H. U. Histological, ultrastructural and quantitative investigations on the response of healthy human pulps to experimental capping with mineral trioxide aggregate: A randomized controlled trial. Int. Endod. J. 41, 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01329.x (2008).
Leye Benoist, F., Gaye Ndiaye, F., Kane, A. W., Benoist, H. M. & Farge, P. Evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) versus calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal) in the formation of a dentine bridge: A randomised controlled trial. Int. Dent. J. 62, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00084.x (2012).
Cho, S. Y. et al. Prognostic factors for clinical outcomes according to time after direct pulp capping. J. Endod. 39, 327–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.034 (2013).
Hilton, T. J., Ferracane, J. L., Mancl, L., Northwest Practice-based Research Collaborative in Evidence-based Dentistry (NWP). Comparison of CaOH with MTA for direct pulp capping: A PBRN randomized clinical trial. J. Dent. Res. 92, 16S-22S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513484336 (2013).
Mente, J. et al. Treatment outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping: Long-term results. J. Endod. 40, 1746–1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.019 (2014).
Kundzina, R., Stangvaltaite, L., Eriksen, H. M. & Kerosuo, E. Capping carious exposures in adults: A randomized controlled trial investigating mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide. Int. Endod. J. 50, 924–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12719 (2017).
Palma, P. J. et al. Tooth discoloration after regenerative endodontic procedures with calcium silicate-based cements—An ex vivo study. Appl. Sci. 10, 5793 (2020).
Kang, S. H. et al. Color changes of teeth after treatment with various mineral trioxide aggregate-based materials: An ex vivo study. J. Endod. 41, 737–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.019 (2015).
Parirokh, M., Torabinejad, M. & Dummer, P. M. H. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: An updated overview—Part I: Vital pulp therapy. Int. Endod. J. 51, 177–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12841 (2018).
Parirokh, M. & Torabinejad, M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review—Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J. Endod. 36, 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.009 (2010).
Tanalp, J., Karapinar-Kazandag, M., Ersev, H. & Bayirli, G. The status of mineral trioxide aggregate in endodontics education in dental schools in Turkey. J. Dent. Educ. 76, 752–758 (2012).
Jang, Y. et al. A randomized controlled study of the use of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and endocem as direct pulp capping materials: 3-Month versus 1-year outcomes. J. Endod. 41, 1201–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.015 (2015).
Kang, C. M. et al. A randomized controlled trial of various MTA materials for partial pulpotomy in permanent teeth. J. Dent. 60, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.015 (2017).
Ramani, A. et al. Comparative evaluation of complete and partial pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A randomized clinical trial. Int. Endod. J. 55, 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13714 (2022).
Nandini, S., Ballal, S. & Kandaswamy, D. Influence of glass-ionomer cement on the interface and setting reaction of mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a furcal repair material using laser Raman spectroscopic analysis. J. Endod. 33, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.010 (2007).
Sharma, R. et al. Association between concentration of active MMP-9 in pulpal blood and pulpotomy outcome in permanent mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis—A preliminary study. Int. Endod. J. 54, 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13437 (2021).
Rechithra, R. et al. Influence of occlusal and proximal caries on the outcome of full pulpotomy in permanent mandibular molar teeth with partial irreversible pulpitis: A prospective study. Int. Endod. J. 54, 1699–1707. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13588 (2021).
Haghgoo, R., Molaasadolah, F., Taghizade, F., Ansari, G. & Asgary, S. Three-year outcome of diode laser pulpotomy of primary molars using three pulp capping agents: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 23, 101920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101920 (2023).
Yang, Y. et al. The effect of partial pulpotomy with iRoot BP Plus in traumatized immature permanent teeth: A randomized prospective controlled trial. Dent. Traumatol. 36, 518–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12563 (2020).
Taha, N. A., Al-Rawash, M. H. & Imran, Z. A. Outcome of full pulpotomy in mature permanent molars using 3 calcium silicate-based materials: A parallel, double blind, randomized controlled trial. Int. Endod. J. 55, 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13707 (2022).
Song, M. et al. Chemomechanical properties and biocompatibility of various premixed putty-type bioactive ceramic cements. J. Endod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.09.005 (2023).
Orstavik, D., Kerekes, K. & Eriksen, H. M. The periapical index: A scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Endod. Dent. Traumatol. 2, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x (1986).
Austin, J. H. & Taylor, H. D. Behavior of hypochlorite and of chloramine-T solutions in contact with necrotic and normal tissues in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 27, 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.27.5.627 (1918).
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33, 363–374 (1977).
Sluyk, S. R., Moon, P. C. & Hartwell, G. R. Evaluation of setting properties and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a furcation perforation repair material. J. Endod. 24, 768–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80171-4 (1998).
European Society of Endodontology Developed B et al. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. Int. Endod. J. 52, 923–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13080 (2019).
Anta, S. et al. Evaluation of complete pulpotomy with biodentine on mature permanent molars with signs and symptoms of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: 12-Months follow-up. J. Endod. 48, 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.12.008 (2022).
Jassal, A. et al. Outcome of partial and full pulpotomy in cariously exposed mature molars with symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis: A randomized controlled trial. Int. Endod. J. 56, 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13872 (2023).
Palma, P. J. et al. Effect of restorative timing on shear bond strength of composite resin/calcium silicate-based cements adhesive interfaces. Clin. Oral Investig. 25, 3131–3139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03640-7 (2021).
Uesrichai, N. et al. Partial pulpotomy with two bioactive cements in permanent teeth of 6- to 18-year-old patients with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Int. Endod. J. 52, 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13071 (2019).
Kang, C. M., Seong, S., Song, J. S. & Shin, Y. The role of hydraulic silicate cements on long-term properties and biocompatibility of partial pulpotomy in permanent teeth. Materials https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020305 (2021).
Santos, J. M. et al. Influence of preoperative pulp inflammation in the outcome of full pulpotomy using a dog model. J. Endod. 47, 1417–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.06.018 (2021).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (Project Number: 1711174467, RS-2020-KD000259).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception, S.-Y.C., I.-Y.J.; design, S.-Y.C., I.-Y.J.; data acquisition, S.-Y.C., S.P., I.-Y.J.; data analysis, S.-Y.C., S.P., I.-Y.J.; data interpretation, S.-Y.C., S.P., Y.S., I.-Y.J.; draft preparation, S.-Y.C., S.P., Y.S., I.-Y.J.; revision, S.-Y.C., S.P., Y.S., I.-Y.J. All authors read and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, SY., Park, S., Shin, Y. et al. Randomized clinical trial of pulpotomy using a premixed injectable calcium silicate cement on mature permanent teeth with reversible pulpitis. Sci Rep 14, 2994 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52818-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52818-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.