Abstract
Field observations in sedimentation and erosion-prone areas indicate that most natural sand deposits may contain a certain amount of non-plastic fines and are often under anisotropic stress conditions. A series of triaxial compression tests were performed on clean and silty sand with fines content fc ranging from 0 to 20% at an initial mean effective stress of p0′ = 100 kPa and varying consolidation conditions to understand the impact of initial stress anisotropy on undrained shear behavior. The results indicate that the state parameter ψ is a superior predictor for characterizing the responses of sand-fines mixtures compared to the global void ratio and relative density. A comparison of the behavior of clean and silty sand with a constant ψ (= − 0.03) confirms that the sample with 10% fc exhibits the strongest dilation and greatest shear resistance, irrespective of the consolidation conditions. It is also demonstrated that the initial stress anisotropy with a comparably higher static stress ratio ηs typically diminishes the shear strength of mixtures. However, the influence of initial stress anisotropy on soil stiffness is not unilateral. The sample consolidated to a negative ηs is stiffer than that under isotropic consolidation, while the presence of a positive ηs leads to a decrease in the secant Young's modulus.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The undrained shear behavior of sandy deposits, including pore pressure generation, strength, and deformation characteristics, is critical for geotechnical engineers. This information is essential for designing foundations and retaining structures, evaluating slope stability, and analyzing potential liquefaction during earthquakes. Field observations in sedimentation and erosion-prone areas such as riverbanks, coastal regions, and deltas indicate that most natural and man-made sand deposits, such as hydraulic fills, contain a certain amount of non-plastic silty fines1,2,3,4. The presence of silty fines in sand significantly impacts the soil’s structural and mechanical behavior, including skeleton, strength, stability, and liquefaction susceptibility. Many laboratory tests have been conducted to examine the undrained shear behavior of sand‒silt mixtures, accounting for multiple factors, such as grain size distribution, type of fines, confining pressure, and loading history5,6,7,8. However, the results of these tests appear to be contradictory since the effect of non-plastic fines on undrained shear strength could be either beneficial or detrimental, depending on the density state and fines content (fc).
The void and skeleton structure of sand‒silt mixture are significantly altered with the increasing amount of silty fines added to the host sand. When fc is low, the behavior of silty sand is mainly controlled by the sand matrix as the coarse grains form the soil skeleton. However, when fc becomes large, the silt matrix composed of fines dominates the soil behavior. This type of transition represents the existence of the threshold fine content (fc,th), which is related to the fundamental change in the skeleton and void distribution and varies in a relatively narrow range in different tested mixtures, i.e., fc,th = 20‒35%7,9,10. The value of fc,th can be determined by a few experimental approaches through a back-analysis of the limiting void ratios, monotonic and cyclic strength data11,12 or using an empirical method based on the following equation13
where χ = D10/d50 is the particle size ratio, in which D10 is the diameter of coarse grains at which 10% of sample is finer and d50 is the mean particle diameter of finer grains. The global void ratio (e) and global relative density (Dr) have been widely used to characterize the shear strength of mixtures; however, no consensus has yet been reached. For example, tests on silty sand with a constant e indicate a decrease in liquefaction resistance, compared with that of clean sand10,14,15. Meanwhile, Sadek and Saleh16 and Dash et al.9 recommended that in comparison with the adoption of a constant e that would induce changes in the soil density, maintaining a constant Dr is a more legitimate approach for characterizing the mechanical behavior of silty sand. According to Singh17, Polito and Martin15, and Kim et al.18, tests performed at a constant Dr showed either an unchanged or a moderate increase/decrease in shear strength. Consequently, concerns have been raised about the legitimacy of the conventional e and Dr in describing the response of such mixed soil, and a hypothesis that fines may fill the voids between coarse grains without participating in the force transfer has been put forward. Several studies19,20,21 employed the skeleton void ratio (es) to capture this effect, which was developed by Thevanayagam et al.22 into the concept of the equivalent skeleton void ratio (es,eq) in accounting for the secondary role of fines in force transfer. Bensoula et al.23 and Porcino and Diano24 further proposed the equivalent relative density in evaluating the liquefaction potential of mixtures contain a wider range of fc by replacing e with es,eq when calculating Dr. In recent decades, there has been an increased interest in utilizing the state parameter ψ to assess the state dependent behavior of silty sand14,25,26,27, which is defined by Been and Jefferies28 as the difference between the current e and the critical state void ratio ec at the same mean effective stress p'. A positive ψ value at the onset of undrained shearing is generally indicative of contractive behavior, whereas a negative ψ value typically signifies dilation and strain hardening. To further define the undrained shear behavior of mixed soils in a coherent manner, Chiu and Fu29 and Rahman et al.8 proposed a framework that combines the state concept and es,eq by introducing the equivalent granular state parameter ψeq. A key step in doing that is to obtain a best-fit parameter that make the critical state data of the clean and silty sand with varying fc, when plotted in the es,eq–p' plane, fall within a narrow band that represents a single critical state line (CSL). It is important to note that the CSL for the host sand is no longer unique and is dependent on fc, thereby violating the principle of the critical state soil mechanics that stipulates the existence of a unique CSL for a given soil.
The preceding experimental studies mainly focused on isotropically consolidated samples. However, silty sand deposits in the field are often under an anisotropic stress condition, sustaining a static deviatoric or shear stress prior to subsequent undrained shearing. Since the studies by Mohamad and Dobry30 and Hyodo et al.31, numerous studies have been performed to investigate the initial stress anisotropy of sand and its influence on the subsequent shear behavior, such as the elastic deformation characteristics, effective stress path, and shear strength32,33,34,35,36,37,38. According to Sivathayalan and Ha32 and Chu et al.39, the initial stress anisotropy may cause the sand become more contractive with more pronounced strain softening. Lashkari et al.35 and Fakharian et al.38 further examined the effects of initial stress anisotropy on the onset of instability, phase transformation, and critical states, and provided useful information highlighting the anisotropic fabric evolution of the sand during shearing. Nonetheless, few studies have investigated the initial stress anisotropy effect on the undrained shear behavior of silty sand with a varying amount of fines, and a consensus has yet to be reached. Bobei et al.40 and Rabbi et al.41 examined the undrained shear characteristics of a natural silty sand under both isotropic and anisotropic (K0) consolidation conditions. They concluded that the static liquefaction potential shows a unique relationship to ψ, regardless of the type of consolidation, whereas the shear strength at characteristic states shows slightly different relationships with ψ for isotropic and anisotropic consolidation. Using a similar laboratory experimental procedure, Lade and Yamamuro42 proposed a simplified approach to analyze the liquefaction potential of silty sand slopes, such as mine tailings and spoil heaps. The effect of initial stress anisotropy on the structural and mechanical properties of sand has also been thoroughly examined by measuring small-to-large strain parameters along various stress paths43,44. Based on series of high-quality experimental results, some new conceptions and models were proposed to quantify the shear modulus and damping ratio of samples subjected to anisotropic loading conditions, which has been verified using the results of systematic bender element, resonant column, and hollow cylinder experiments on different types of soil mixtures37,45,46,47.
These preliminary findings emphasize the need for a more comprehensive investigation into the role of initial stress anisotropy in the shear behavior of silty sand at varying fc. On the other hand, only a few studies have investigated the adequacy of state indices, such as e, Dr, and ψ, in characterizing the mixtures’ responses, and diverse views exist as to whether the increasing fc has a detrimental or beneficial influence. More importantly, it is necessary to further explore how the presence of fines and initial stress anisotropy alters the shear strength and stiffness of sand simultaneously, which is the primary objective of the present study. Thus, a series of undrained triaxial compression tests were conducted on saturated clean and silty sand with fc varying from 0 to 20%. The fundamental shear behavior of isotropically consolidated samples was examined by considering different indices, and constant value of ψ was used as a comparative benchmark to investigate the effect of initial stress anisotropy. Based on experimental observations of stress–strain behavior and pore pressure development, the strength and stiffness characteristics of silty sand were comprehensively presented and interpreted.
Materials and methods
The material tested in this study was Fujian sand, a type of Chinese standard sand composed of sub-angular to sub-rounded silica grains. The sand grains were ground into non-plastic fines with particle diameters primarily ranging from 2 to 75 μm. The particle size distribution curves and basic physical properties of the test materials are shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1, respectively. The silty sand sample that is formed by mixing crushed fines with the host sand was controlled at fc = 5%, 10%, and 20%. The maximum void ratio (emax) was determined using Method B in ASTM D4254-1648 with a cylindrical tube, and the minimum void ratio (emin) was measured through vibratory table tests49. Although the procedures were recommended for samples with small fines fractions, they were extended in testing mixed soils at a higher fc to achieve a consistent comparison11,15. The dry proctor test method7,11 was also adopted to measure emin of the silty sand with fc > 10% in the present study. In agreement with the findings of Polito and Martin15, the proctor test yields a similar emin value to that produced by the vibration method. The results show that the limiting void ratios first decrease and then increase with increasing fc, and the lowest values appear at around fc = 30%, which can be roughly regarded as fc,th. This value is comparable with that of fc,th = 29% determined from the empirical approach using Eq. (1), which has been verified and widely adopted10,50.
Tests were performed utilizing an automated triaxial testing system, as described by Zhou et al.51. Samples of approximately 50 mm in diameter and 100 mm in height were prepared via the moist tamping method, which avoids segregation between sand and fine particles26,52. The oven-dried sand, mixed with de-aired water to achieve 5% moisture content, was compacted in three layers into a split mold using a small hammer. After removing the split mold, the actual dimensions of the sample and its volumetric strain during preparation and consolidation were measured to calculate the actual density state, which is also determined through the back-analysis procedure by measuring the final water content of the sample at the end of tests53. The samples were completely saturated with Skempton’s B-values above 0.95 and then isotropically or anisotropically consolidated to a specific static deviatoric stress qs (= σv − σh, where σv and σh are the vertical and horizontal normal stress, respectively) at an initial mean effective stress of p0' = 100 kPa. The controlled void ratio after consolidation is achieved by a trial procedure. To achieve the same range of void ratio as samples undergoing isotropic consolidation, the sample that will be anisotropically consolidated is intended to be densely or loosely deposited at the preparation stage, depending on its volume change tendency during anisotropic consolidation. If the void ratio of a sample is still out of the desired range, it will be discarded. In fact, the test series selected and shown below are the best outcome in terms of the samples’ density for comparison purpose. Then strain-controlled triaxial compression tests were conducted under undrained conditions by applying the monotonic deviatoric stress at a strain rate of 0.1%/min, which was widely adopted by Hyodo et al.31, Murthy et al.6, Pan et al.54, and Porcino et al.55 to evaluate the undrained shear response of both clean and silty sand.
Table 2 summarizes all the monotonic triaxial conditions investigated in this study, as designated by state indices (e, Dr, and ψ), stress variables (σv, σh, and qs), and stress anisotropy factor ηs (= qs/p0'), which are classified into four series based on the controlled fc. The results obtained from the benchmark tests in each series were compared to preliminarily examine the suitability of e, Dr, and ψ in characterizing the undrained shear behavior of isotropically consolidated samples. Subsequently, tests addressing different ηs levels were performed on anisotropically consolidated samples under a constant ψ (= − 0.03) condition.
Results
Undrained shear behavior of isotropically consolidated samples
Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the effective stress path and stress–strain curve, respectively, of isotropically consolidated samples with fc = 0, 5%, 10%, and 20%. These data show the effect of the global void ratio e after consolidation on the undrained shear behavior. As shown in Fig. 2a, the clean sand with e = 0.749 shows predominate dilation, whereas the sample with e = 0.845 exhibits an initial contractive phase, followed by dilative behavior. In between is the case of e = 0.826, in which the phase-transformation state56 that divides the contractive and dilative responses can also be found. In Fig. 3a, all the three clean sand samples display stable strain-hardening behavior toward the critical state. Similarly, for the silty sand a given fc, a decrease in e leads to a shift from a tendency to contract to a tendency to dilate (Fig. 2), accompanied by a transition from strain-softening to strain-hardening behavior (Fig. 3).
Figure 4 presents a comparison between the responses of clean and silty sand under isotropic consolidation. The basis for the comparison of samples in Fig. 4a,b is the post-consolidation relative density (Dr = 18.9%). It is shown that the addition of silty fines results in a decrease in shear strength and an increase in the degree of strain softening compared to the clean sand, although the void ratio declines with increasing fc. When comparing the responses of samples having a constant e (= 0.782), as shown in Fig. 4c,d, the clean sand also exhibits a very dilative response, with a marked and stable increase in strength compared with that of silty sand. In fact, the behavior of silty sand at a lower fc is primarily controlled by the sand matrix because the silty fines may fill the voids formed by coarse grains with less participation in the force transfer mechanism.
In most of the tests conducted in this study, the axial strain developed over 25% and the rate of variation in deviatoric stress at that strain level was relatively small; such a state is postulated close enough and can be used to approximate the critical state. The critical state data for clean and silty sand are displayed on q-p' and e-logp' planes in Fig. 5a,b, respectively. The plot shows that the critical state stress points in q-p' plane fall within a narrow band that can be represented by straight lines passing through the origin
where Mcs is the critical state stress ratio relating to the critical state friction angle ϕcs as
A detailed scrutiny of Fig. 5a shows that the clean Fujian sand has a ϕcs value of 30.9°, being comparable with that obtain from Yang and Wei52 on the same sand and less than the value for Toyoura sand that is more angular. For the sand mixed with 5–20% fines, Fig. 5a shows a slightly higher ϕcs of 32.1°, although it appears insensitive to the increasing fines contents. This is mainly due to the presence of crushed fines that are angular with irregular geometry and implies that the friction angle of a mixed soil is affected by the shape of both coarse and finer particles. Thus, the shape characteristics of the tested host sand and fines, including the aspect ratio, sphericity, and roundness, should be examined in a quantitative way and further compared with other types of finer and coarse grains in future, which may allow a better understanding of their macro-scale properties that are potentially associated with the particle shape.
Compared with the CSL in the q-p' plane that is insensitive to fc variation, the critical state locus in the e-logp' plane shown in Fig. 5b descends as fc increases up to 20%. This observation aligns with that reported by Thevanayagam et al.22, Murthy et al.6, and Yang et al.25 on several different silty sands. Of note, the critical state locus on the semi-log form is not a straight line but instead a curved line that can be described through a power function of the form proposed by Li and Wang57
where ecs is the critical state void ratio, pa denotes atmospheric pressure (101 kPa), eΓ, λ, and ξ are fitting parameters. The least-square regression is employed to estimate the expression for each mixture’s CSL (Fig. 5b), assuming that the power-law exponent ξ is constant and equal to 0.6 in line with Yang et al.’s25 finding. The parameters eΓ and λ exhibit a decreasing trend with increasing fc. Some scatter exists in the critical state data, especially when fc goes up, which may be contributed to the change of achieving uniform sample with increasing fc and the inherent variability in the material. Ni et al.2 and Chiu and Fu29 have noted that further increase in fc might lead to an upward movement of the CSL. This signifies the presence of the threshold fc,th distinguishing the locations of the CSL of silty sand, which is beyond the range of fc (0‒20%) considered this study.
The behavior of clean and silty sand samples that are packed at a constant ψ is shown in Fig. 6, where the value of ψ = − 0.03 is calculated using the CSL specific to fc of the sand-fines mixtures, which provides convenience in controlling of samples’ density under the testing conditions. Selecting this value allows the attainment of samples in a loose or medium dense state (Dr ≈ 20‒50%, as shown in Table 2), neither too loose nor too dense, facilitating subsequent experimental operations and data acquisition. All four isotropically consolidated samples that are undrained sheared from a negative ψ exhibit a prominent dilative, stable strain-hardening behavior, which conforms with the framework of critical state soil mechanics. Specifically, the clean sand behaves a contractive phase at the start of undrained shearing, while the degree of contraction decreases as fc increases and the sample with fc = 10% shows a fully dilative behavior. A transition arises when fc increases to 20%, leading to a slightly contractive initial phase for the sample. Correspondingly, the shear strength at the critical state increases first and then decreases with increasing fc, with the sample at 10% fc manifesting the highest shear strength. As granular materials in nature, the sand‒silt mixtures comprising discrete particles exhibit complex structure and mechanical behaviors during the loading process. Shire et al.58,59 investigated the micro-structure and micro-properties of granular mixtures under isotropic compression. It has been shown that for a mixture containing a comparatively lower fc, the finer grains fill voids left by the coarse ones without separating them, such that the latter sustaining the strong force chains will be significantly reinforced by a large number of fines around them. As fc further increases to a critical fraction, some of the fines tend to separate the coarse particles from one another, leading to the soil matrix being less resistant to the external forces. This may account for the above phenomenon that samples with 10% and 20% fc behave a notable deviation in the stress–strain behavior. Compared with the dramatic differences observed in soil behavior under constant e or Dr (Fig. 4), the overall analogous behavior shown in Fig. 6 implies that ψ is a comparatively superior predictor for synthesizing the undrained shear behavior of clean and silty sand.
The instability state (IS) representing the peak stress point is a striking feature associated with the strain-softening behavior of sand. In Fig. 7, the stress ratio at the onset of IS, ηIS = qIS/pIS', is plotted against ψ; also included are the data from Yang and Wei52 on the similar test material for comparison. The variations in data points indicate that the trend of ηIS with respect to ψ is sensitive to the amount of fines. Nevertheless, there exist fairly good correlations between ηIS and ψ, in accordance with which ηIS decreases with ψ reported by Yang and Wei52, Lashkari et al.35, and Fakharian et al.38, implying that the instability is triggered at a lower stress ratio for samples with higher contractive tendency.
Effect of initial stress anisotropy on strength and stiffness characteristics
The above results demonstrate the effectiveness of the constant ψ approach in the comparative study of the soil mixtures having fc values ranging from 0 to 20%. Therefore, the following interpretations regarding the initial stress anisotropy effect are based on tests conducted under the same ψ value of − 0.03. Figures 8, 9 and 10 present the effective stress paths and stress–strain curves of clean and silty sand samples that are anisotropically consolidated to different ηs. In Fig. 8, the clean sand subjected to ηs = 0.4 behaves a contraction-to-dilation manner, while samples mixed with 5% and 10% fc show a more dilative behavior. At fc = 20%, the sample displays a highly contractive response and achieves a transient minimum shear strength known as the quasi-steady state60 prior to dilation and strain hardening toward the critical state. The scenario that the sample with 10% fc has the strongest dilation and highest strength is compatible with that observed in isotropically consolidated samples (Fig. 6). Similar observations can be drawn for the sample subjected to ηs = 0.6 and − 0.4, as depicted in Figs. 9 and 10, respectively. Note that the situation where ηs = − 0.4 corresponds to an initial extensional static stress, which is a less investigated but particular point of interest36. Moreover, it is found that a comparably higher ηs level leads to a deterioration in the monotonic shear behavior of the sand-silt mixtures. For example, Fig. 9 shows that the silty sand with fc = 20% that undergoes anisotropic consolidation to ηs = 0.6 is characterized by fully contractive and strain-softening behaviors. This type of behavior, typically associated with the instability, is commonly referred to as static liquefaction61.
Figure 11 further presents the stress strain curve of samples with varying degrees of initial stress anisotropy but with a constant state parameter (ψ = − 0.03). Regardless of fc levels (0‒20%) considered herein, the sample under isotropic consolidation (ηs = 0) exhibits a marked stable strain-hardening behavior, in comparison to that undergoes initial stress anisotropy. More specifically, Fig. 11a,d clearly show that samples behave from a strain-hardening type response to a strain-softening type response, as the degree of stress anisotropy increases. The presence of the initial stress anisotropy also has a weakened effect on the undrained shear strength, as illustrated in detail in the following discussion.
The undrained shear strength represented by qu is determined by the peak deviatoric stress for strain-softening type response or the mobilized deviatoric stress at a strain level of 15% for strain-hardening type response. Figure 12 illustrates the variations of qu of clean and silty sand with the initial stress anisotropy represented by ηs. For each fc considered in this study, qu has an increasing and then decreasing trend as ηs increases from − 0.4 to 0.6 and reaches its maximum value at ηs = 0, indicating that the initial stress anisotropy has a detrimental effect on the strength of both clean and silty sand. This trend deviates somewhat from Kato et al.62, Georgiannou and Konstadinou63, and Pan et al.54, who reported that anisotropic consolidation with σv > σh at a lower ηs level leads to an increase in the shear strength of sand. It is also shown that the addition of silty fines can either enhance or reduce the shear strength of sand, depending on fc. Specifically, the trend of qu against ηs shifts upward as fc increases to 10% and then moves downward dramatically with further increases in fc. Thus, the curves of fc = 10% and 20% constitute the upper and lower bounds, respectively. This signifies that there exists a critical fc between 10 and 20%, at which although most of the fines are confined within voids, some of them separate the coarse particles from one another, increasing the fragility of the soil58,64. This is essentially different from fc,th determined above.
The significant differences in the strength characteristics between clean and silty sand under different anisotropic consolidation, as shown in Fig. 12, are intimately related to the particle packing and arrangement of the mixtures. Through the discrete element method (DEM), numerous studies have been performed to investigate the influence of fines and stress anisotropy on the structure and mechanical properties of granular materials (see Minh et al.65; Shire et al.59; Zhou et al.66). It is recognized that grains under gravity may cause their long axes to orient horizontally, making the sample become weaker in triaxial extension than in compression. This may explain the decrease in shear strength for samples with an extensional static deviatoric stress (i.e., a negative ηs). When the sample is anisotropically consolidated with a comparatively higher (compressional) static stress, more grains tend to lie on the horizontal direction54, especially for the sample with crushed fines that have more elongated particles. Consequently, the silty sand under anisotropic consolidation features a higher degree of anisotropy than the isotropically consolidated sample owing to the preferential orientations of particles, leading to the former being more contractive and susceptible to shear failure. Nevertheless, a micromechanical study through direct grain-scale observations should be further undertaken to better understand the underlying mechanisms.
Under undrained triaxial loading, the soil stiffness is usually quantified in terms of the undrained Young’s modulus, Eu, which is defined as the secant slope of the deviatoric stress–strain curve67. In Fig. 13, variations in Eu with the associated axial strain are plotted on a logarithmic scale for isotropically consolidated samples with varying fc. Overall, a considerable degradation in Eu is observed for the strain levels considered herein. As shown, the stiffness degradation curve of the clean sand is located on the lower part of the figure, whereas curves of fc = 5‒20% are closely arranged on the upper portion. This indicates that the silty sand has significantly higher stiffness than that of clean sand under isotropic consolidation; however, this strengthening effect is insensitive to the amount of fines. It can also be observed in Fig. 13 that the difference in stiffness data between the clean and silty sand gradually narrows as strain increases, and the stiffness degradation curves tend to coincide when the axial strain surpasses 1%.
According to Clayton67 and Pan et al.54, the secant stiffness at εa = 0.1% is significant for analyzing soil‒structure interaction since strain levels associated with geotechnical structures, including spread foundations, retaining walls, and tunnels, always fall within this range. Figure 14 shows a summary of the undrained Young’s modulus Eu at εa = 0.1% (Eu,0.1) for clean and silty sand under different consolidation conditions. Similar to Fig. 13, Fig. 14 reveals again that the addition of 5‒20% silty fines to clean sand has a beneficial influence on the stiffness, irrespective of ηs levels. However, the Eu,0.1 values for silty sand samples under specific consolidation condition do not display a systematic shift as fc transitions from 5 to 20%, indicating that the effect of fc on stiffness is non-monotonic. It is also shown that both the clean and silty sand have an overall decreasing trend of Eu,0.1 as ηs increases from − 0.4 to 0.6 with two exceptions, which are samples with fc = 0 and 10% subjected to ηs = 0.6. As a result, it is observed that anisotropic consolidation with σv < σh (ηs = − 0.4) enhances the soil stiffness during triaxial compression in comparison to isotropic consolidation (ηs = 0), whereas anisotropic consolidation with σv > σh (ηs = 0.4 and 0.6) has an adverse effect. These findings are consistent with those reported by Yamashita et al.68 and Pan et al.54, who discovered that static deviatoric stress on one side (compression or extension) might reduce the stiffness when the sample is subsequently sheared on the same side but strengthen it when the sample is sheared on the other side.
Conclusion
A series of undrained triaxial compression tests were conducted on clean and silty sand with the fines content fc ranging from 0 to 20% under either isotropic or anisotropic consolidation to an initial mean effective stress of p0' = 100 kPa. The adequacy of state indices, such as the global void ratio e, relative density Dr, and state parameter ψ in characterizing the behavior of isotropically consolidated samples was examined. The results of tests considering the effect of initial stress anisotropy under a constant ψ (= − 0.03) condition were presented and analyzed, with a focus on the strength and stiffness characteristics. The following main conclusions can be drawn from this study:
-
(1)
Comparing the undrained shear behavior of clean and silty sand using different state indices reveals varying perspectives on the effect of silty fines. While substantial differences in soil behavior under constant e or Dr are evident, the similar overall behavior with a constant ψ implies that ψ is a comparatively superior predictor for synthesizing the responses of sand-fines mixtures, which also provides fairly good correlations to the instability stress ratio.
-
(2)
The state of axial strain developed to 25% is used to approximate the critical state of mixtures. A unique critical state line is obtained in the q-p' plane for samples mixed with 5‒20% fines, yielding a critical state friction angle of 32.1°, which is slightly larger than that determined from the clean sand. This is mainly due to the presence of crushed fines that are more angular with irregular geometry than the host sand. Conversely, the critical state locus in the e-logp' plane is non-unique and can be described with a power function, exhibiting a declining tendency as fc increases up to 20%.
-
(3)
Under a constant ψ condition, the silty sand with 10% fc has the strongest dilation and highest shear resistance. A comparably higher static stress ratio ηs typically leads to a deterioration in the monotonic shear behavior. Specifically, the undrained shear strength increases and then decreases as ηs increases from − 0.4 to 0.6 and peaks at ηs = 0, indicating that the initial stress anisotropy has a detrimental effect on the strength of both clean and silty sand. A grain-scale interpretation is made to provide a better understanding of these macro-observations; however, further laboratory experiments covering a wide range of fc and ψ and micromechanical studies through discrete element simulations are favorably undertaken to examine the underlying mechanisms.
-
(4)
The initial stress anisotropy may act positively or negatively on the undrained shear stiffness quantified by the secant Young’s modulus, depending on the direction of ηs. The stiffness of mixtures in triaxial compression may reduce if the sample undergoes a compressional ηs but increase if it acts on the extension side. Moreover, the addition of 5‒20% silty fines to clean sand has a favorable impact on the stiffness, regardless of the ηs levels considered herein.
Data availability
Some or all data, models, and code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Lade, P. V. & Yamamuro, J. A. Effects of nonplastic fines on static liquefaction of sands. Can. Geotech. J. 34, 918 (1997).
Ni, Q., Tan, T. S., Dasari, G. R. & Hight, D. W. Contribution of fines to the compressive strength of mixed soils. Géotechnique 54, 561–569 (2004).
Hazirbaba, K. & Rathje, E. M. Pore pressure generation of silty sands due to induced cyclic shear strains. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135, 1892–1905 (2009).
Kokusho, T. Major advances in liquefaction research by laboratory tests compared with in situ behavior. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 91, 3–22 (2016).
Xenaki, V. C. & Athanasopoulos, G. A. Liquefaction resistance of sand–silt mixtures: An experimental investigation of the effect of fines. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 23, 1–12 (2003).
Murthy, T. G., Loukidis, D., Carraro, J. A. H., Prezzi, M. & Salgado, R. Undrained monotonic response of clean and silty sands. Géotechnique 57, 273–288 (2007).
Papadopoulou, A. & Tika, T. The effect of fines on critical state and liquefaction resistance characteristics of non-plastic silty sands. Soils Found. 48, 713–725 (2008).
Rahman, M. M., Baki, M. A. L. & Lo, S. R. Prediction of undrained monotonic and cyclic liquefaction behavior of sand with fines based on the equivalent granular state parameter. Int. J. Geomech. 14, 254–266 (2014).
Dash, H. K., Sitharam, T. G. & Baudet, B. A. Influence of non-plastic fines on the response of a silty sand to cyclic loading. Soils Found. 50, 695–704 (2010).
Mohammadi, A. & Qadimi, A. A simple critical state approach to predicting the cyclic and monotonic response of sands with different fines contents using the equivalent intergranular void ratio. Acta Geotech. 10, 587–606 (2015).
Yang, S., Lacasse, S. & Sandven, R. Determination of the transitional fines content of mixtures of sand and non-plastic fines. Geotech. Test. J. 29, 14010 (2006).
Zuo, L. & Baudet, B. A. Determination of the transitional fines content of sand-non plastic fines mixtures. Soils Found. 55, 213–219 (2015).
Rahman, M. M. & Lo, S. R. The prediction of equivalent granular steady state line of loose sand with fines. Geomech. Geoeng. 3, 179–190 (2008).
Stamatopoulos, C. A. An experimental study of the liquefaction strength of silty sands in terms of the state parameter. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 30, 662–678 (2010).
Polito, C. P. & Martin, J. R. II. Effects of nonplastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127, 408–415 (2001).
Sadek, S. & Saleh, M. The effect of carbonaceous fines on the cyclic resistance of poorly graded sands. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 25, 257–264 (2007).
Singh, S. Liquefaction characteristics of silts. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 14, 1–19 (1996).
Kim, U., Kim, D. & Zhuang, L. Influence of fines content on the undrained cyclic shear strength of sand–clay mixtures. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 83, 124–134 (2016).
Pitman, T. D., Robertson, P. K. & Sego, D. C. Influence of fines on the collapse of loose sands. Can. Geotech. J. 31, 728–739 (1994).
Thevanayagam, S. & Mohan, S. Intergranular state variables and stress–strain behaviour of silty sands. Géotechnique 50, 1–23 (2000).
Chu, J. & Leong, W. K. Effect of fines on instability behaviour of loose sand. Géotechnique 52, 751–755 (2002).
Thevanayagam, S., Shenthan, T., Mohan, S. & Liang, J. Undrained fragility of clean sands, silty sands, and sandy silts. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128, 849–859 (2002).
Bensoula, M., Missoum, H. & Bendani, K. Critical undrained shear strength of loose-medium sand-silt mixtures under monotonic loadings. JTAM 53, 331–344 (2015).
Porcino, D. D. & Diano, V. The influence of non-plastic fines on pore water pressure generation and undrained shear strength of sand-silt mixtures. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 101, 311–321 (2017).
Yang, J., Wei, L. M. & Dai, B. B. State variables for silty sands: Global void ratio or skeleton void ratio? Soils Found. 55, 99–111 (2015).
Pan, K., Zhou, G. Y., Yang, Z. X. & Cai, Y. Q. Comparison of cyclic liquefaction behavior of clean and silty sands considering static shear effect. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 139, 106338 (2020).
Rahman, Md. M. & Lo, S. R. Undrained behavior of sand-fines mixtures and their state parameter. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140, 04014036 (2014).
Been, K. & Jefferies, M. G. A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 35, 99–112 (1985).
Chiu, C. F. & Fu, X. J. Interpreting undrained instability of mixed soils by equivalent intergranular state parameter. Géotechnique 58, 751–755 (2008).
Mohamad, R. & Dobry, R. Undrained monotonic and cyclic triaxial strength of sand. J. Geotech. Eng. 112, 941–958 (1986).
Hyodo, M., Tanimizu, H., Yasufuku, N. & Murata, H. Undrained cyclic and monotonic triaxial behaviour of saturated loose sand. Soils Found. 34, 19–32 (1994).
Sivathayalan, S. & Ha, D. Effect of static shear stress on the cyclic resistance of sands in simple shear loading. Can. Geotech. J. 48, 1471–1484 (2011).
Doanh, T., Finge, Z. & Boucq, S. Effects of previous deviatoric strain histories on the undrained behaviour of Hostun RF loose sand. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 30, 697–712 (2012).
Georgiannou, V. N. & Konstadinou, M. Torsional shear behavior of anisotropically consolidated sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140, 04013017 (2014).
Lashkari, A., Karimi, A., Fakharian, K. & Kaviani-Hamedani, F. Prediction of undrained behavior of isotropically and anisotropically consolidated Firoozkuh sand: Instability and flow liquefaction. Int. J. Geomech. 17, 04017083 (2017).
Yang, Z. X. & Pan, K. Flow deformation and cyclic resistance of saturated loose sand considering initial static shear effect. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 92, 68–78 (2017).
Zamanian, M., Payan, M., Memarian, S. & Senetakis, K. Impact of bedding plane direction and type of plastic microparticles on stiffness of inherently anisotropic gap-graded soils: Index, wave propagation and micromechanical-based interpretations. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 150, 106924 (2021).
Fakharian, K., Kaviani-Hamedani, F. & Imam, S. M. R. Influences of initial anisotropy and principal stress rotation on the undrained monotonic behavior of a loose silica sand. Can. Geotech. J. 59, 847–862 (2022).
Chu, J., Wanatowski, D., Loke, W. L. & Leong, W. K. Pre-failure instability of sand under dilatancy rate controlled conditions. Soils Found. 55, 414–424 (2015).
Bobei, D. C., Lo, S. R., Wanatowski, D., Gnanendran, C. T. & Rahman, M. M. Modified state parameter for characterizing static liquefaction of sand with fines. Can. Geotech. J. 46, 281–295 (2009).
Rabbi, A. TMd. Z., Rahman, Md. M. & Cameron, D. A. Undrained behavior of silty sand and the role of isotropic and K0 consolidation. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144, 04018014 (2018).
Lade, P. V. & Yamamuro, J. A. Evaluation of static liquefaction potential of silty sand slopes. Can. Geotech. J. 48, 247–264 (2011).
Payan, M., Khoshghalb, A., Senetakis, K. & Khalili, N. Small-strain stiffness of sand subjected to stress anisotropy. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 88, 143–151 (2016).
Payan, M. & Senetakis, K. Effect of anisotropic stress state on elastic shear stiffness of sand–silt mixture. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 37, 2237–2244 (2019).
Payan, M., Senetakis, K., Khoshghalb, A. & Khalili, N. Characterization of the small-strain dynamic behaviour of silty sands; contribution of silica non-plastic fines content. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 102, 232–240 (2017).
Senetakis, K. & Payan, M. Small strain damping ratio of sands and silty sands subjected to flexural and torsional resonant column excitation. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 114, 448–459 (2018).
Zamanian, M., Payan, M., Jafarzadeh, F., Ranjbar, N. & Senetakis, K. Evolution of dynamic properties of cross-anisotropic sand subjected to stress anisotropy. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147, 04021048 (2021).
ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density (ASTM, 2016).
ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table (ASTM, 2016).
Rahman, Md. M. & Sitharam, T. G. Cyclic liquefaction screening of sand with non-plastic fines: Critical state approach. Geosci. Front. 11, 429–438 (2020).
Zhou, G. Y., Pan, K. & Yang, Z. X. Energy-based assessment of cyclic liquefaction behavior of clean and silty sand under sustained initial stress conditions. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 164, 107609 (2023).
Yang, J. & Wei, L. M. Collapse of loose sand with the addition of fines: The role of particle shape. Géotechnique 62, 1111–1125 (2012).
Verdugo, R. & Ishihara, K. The steady state of sandy soils. Soils Found. 36, 81–91 (1996).
Pan, K., Yang, Z. X. & Xu, T. T. Impact of static preshearing on undrained anisotropy and shear characteristics of sand. Int. J. Geomech. 18, 04018162 (2018).
Porcino, D. D., Diano, V., Triantafyllidis, T. & Wichtmann, T. Predicting undrained static response of sand with non-plastic fines in terms of equivalent granular state parameter. Acta Geotech. 15, 867–882 (2020).
Ishihara, K., Tatsuoka, F. & Yasuda, S. Undrained deformation and liquefaction of sand under cyclic stresses. Soils Found. 15, 29–44 (1975).
Li, X. S. & Wang, Y. Linear representation of steady-state line for sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124, 1215–1217 (1998).
Shire, T., O’Sullivan, C., Hanley, K. J. & Fannin, R. J. Fabric and effective stress distribution in internally unstable soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140, 04014072 (2014).
Shire, T., O’Sullivan, C. & Hanley, K. J. The influence of fines content and size-ratio on the micro-scale properties of dense bimodal materials. Granul. Matter 18, 52 (2016).
Sladen, J. A., D’Hollander, R. D. & Krahn, J. The liquefaction of sands, a collapse surface approach. Can. Geotech. J. 22, 564–578 (1985).
Lade, P. V. Static instability and liquefaction of loose fine sandy slopes. J. Geotech. Eng. 118, 51–71 (1992).
Kato, S., Ishihara, K. & Towhata, I. Undrained shear characteristics of saturated sand under anisotropic consolidation. Soils Found. 41, 1–11 (2001).
Georgiannou, V. N. & Konstadinou, M. Effects of density on cyclic behaviour of anisotropically consolidated Ottawa sand under undrained torsional loading. Géotechnique 64, 287–302 (2014).
Skempton, A. W. & Brogan, J. M. Experiments on piping in sandy gravels. Géotechnique 44, 449–460 (1994).
Minh, N. H., Cheng, Y. P. & Thornton, C. Strong force networks in granular mixtures. Granul. Matter 16, 69–78 (2014).
Zhou, W., Wu, W., Ma, G., Ng, T. & Chang, X. Undrained behavior of binary granular mixtures with different fines contents. Powder Technol. 340, 139–153 (2018).
Clayton, C. R. I. Stiffness at small strain: Research and practice. Géotechnique 61, 5–37 (2011).
Yamashita, S., Jamiolkowski, M. & Presti, D. C. F. L. Stiffness nonlinearity of three sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126, 929–938 (2000).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFC3009400), Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 52178362, 52378377, and U2239251, Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. LY23E080009, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang under Grant No. 2022RB01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, K.P.; methodology, C.Z. and B.L.; software, P.L.; validation, C.Z.; formal analysis, P.L.; investigation, K.P.; resources, B.L.; data curation, P.L.; writing—original draft preparation, P.L. and K.P.; writing—review and editing, K.P.; visualization, P.L.; supervision, K.P.; project administration, K.P.; funding acquisition, K.P. and X.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, P., Zhu, C., Pan, X. et al. Undrained shear behavior of silty sand with a constant state parameter considering initial stress anisotropy effect. Sci Rep 14, 2213 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50901-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50901-y
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.