Abstract
The Arctic is subjected to all-encompassing disruptions in marine ecosystems caused by anthropogenic warming. To provide reliable estimates of how future changes will affect the ecosystems, knowledge of Arctic marine ecosystem responses to past environmental variability beyond the instrumental era is essential. Here, we present a novel approach on how to evaluate the state of benthic marine biotic conditions during the deglacial and Holocene period on the Northeast Greenland shelf. Benthic foraminiferal species were assigned traits (e.g., oxygen tolerance, food preferences) aiming to identify past faunal changes as a response to external forcing mechanisms. This approach was applied on sediment cores from offshore Northeast Greenland. We performed numerical rate-of-change detection to determine significant changes in the benthic foraminiferal traits. That way, the significant abrupt trait changes can be assessed across sites, providing a better understanding of the impact of climate drivers on the traits. Our results demonstrate that during the last ~ 14,000 years, bottom water oxygen is the main factor affecting the variability in the benthic foraminiferal faunas in this area. Our results show that significant changes in the traits correspond to drastic climate perturbations. Specifically, the deglacial-Holocene transition and mid-Holocene warm period exhibited significant change, with several trait turnovers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The Arctic is subjected to an unprecedented rate of temperature increase. In 2022, the temperature in the Arctic exceeded the 1991–2020 average by 1.2 °C, ranking as the fourth warmest year since recordings began in 19501. Including 2022, eight of the warmest years on record have taken place since 20111. This has caused major changes in the distribution and configuration of ocean circulation, ice sheets, sea ice, primary production, biodiversity, and marine ecosystems in the region2. The marine food web relies on primary producers, as they occupy the lowest trophic level of the food chain. The primary producers benefit from the release of nutrients from melting sea ice; however, the rapid decline in Arctic sea-ice extent and transitions to more open waters has caused a regime shift in the primary production3. Additionally, in connection with the rapid retreat of marine-terminating glaciers in Greenland, elevated meltwater fluxes cause increased stratification in coastal areas, reducing the local primary production and hampering the vertical mixing4. On the other hand, marine-terminating glaciers can also induce upwelling and thus increase the surface nutrient supply, which enhances primary production4. These changes in primary production have significant impacts on the regional benthic-pelagic coupling, as efficiency of the trophic energy transfer is altered5,6. Present and future regime shifts related to climate change will eventually lead to significant alterations of the Arctic marine ecosystems7,8. The effect on diversity depends on the individual species’ sensitivity and ability to adapt to changing environments. However, events such as extreme meltwater release and sea-ice retreat can have critical effects on species adaption to new environmental regimes2,9. Overall, the observed alterations in biodiversity and marine ecosystems have important consequences for the Arctic food web; but also beyond disrupting food security of native communities and economies that rely on fisheries.
In order to understand the impact of recent and future climate change on Arctic marine ecosystems, knowledge of biotal changes in response to natural climate change prior to the instrumental era is essential. These reconstructions can provide information on the speed of biotic change and long-term consequences of tipping cascades. Here, we assess past changes in benthic foraminiferal traits off NE Greenland in response to environmental variability. Benthic foraminifera are microscopic unicellular organisms, but still comprise a large standing stock in benthic ecosystems. Especially in the Arctic deep seas, benthic foraminifera encompass a large part of the total benthic biomass10,11. They generally preserve well in the fossil record and they are sensitive to changes in dissolved oxygen content, temperature, substrate, salinity, and nutrient availability12,13. The preferred food sources for most species include diatoms, small chlorophytes, and certain bacteria that sink to the seafloor12,13,14. Thus, they are highly dependent on export of organic particles from the water column, although some species feed on dissolved more refractory organic matter in the sediments12. Benthic foraminifera contribute to the biogeochemical cycling in the sediment by feeding on smaller organisms and, although many simply end up in the sediment at the end of their life cycle, others also act as prey for benthic macroorganisms. They are consumed by predators and non-selective deposit feeders such as scaphopod molluscs14,15. Hence, they represent a link between lower and higher trophic levels of benthic marine food webs12,16. Combined with their relatively short life span this makes them excellent candidates for estimating the state and rapid alterations of marine ecosystems.
Typically, the focus in paleoceanographic studies is on the different individual species and their respective niches, while in ecology, researchers commonly work with so-called trait groups (e.g. species morphology, demands for certain habitat conditions, or tolerance to specific environmental stress factors) consisting of several species to assess ecosystem conditions17,18. A trait-based approach allows a more direct assessment of the state of an ecosystem and provides an integrated summary of the full species assemblage. Several studies have already classified and assigned traits to modern plant and phytoplankton communities, aiming to assess and predict overall changes in the communities as a response to external forcing mechanisms19,20. Assigning traits to Arctic benthic foraminiferal species is not commonly used in evaluating the speed of change in benthic ecosystems as a response to environmental changes through time. Previous studies have grouped benthic foraminiferal species into different ecological groups to reconstruct environmental changes downcore21,22, however they used a different approach to the one we are proposing in this study. Thus, our goals for this study is to reconstruct the paleoenvironmental changes based on the trait approach and to test for significant changes in benthic foraminiferal traits in response to changes in the environment. This will reveal whether trait-based analyses of benthic foraminifera can provide new information on ecosystem response to environmental and climatic change, compared to the traditional species-based reconstructions. We will assess how specific traits (pores, living strategy/mode, substrate preferences, test material, oxygen tolerance, and food preferences) responded to shorter- and longer-lasting climatic perturbations during the last 14,000 years, corresponding to the last deglaciation and the Holocene, a period when significant climatic changes occurred globally23. Our study is based on trait analysis of benthic foraminiferal assemblages from eight gravity cores from the northeast Greenland shelf. The Holocene changes in physical properties such as water mass, glacier proximity, and sea-ice cover are known from previous studies, based on X-ray fluorescence core scans, grain size data from marine sediment cores, sea-ice biomarkers, driftwood delivery and, exposure (10Be and 14C) dates24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32. Through statistical methods, we aim to identify and quantify which traits explain most of the variability in the datasets as well as to detect the most significant changes within the benthic foraminiferal traits.
By applying this novel trait-based approach, we aim to capture the key aspects of benthic ecosystem evolution while diminishing the well-known uncertainties involving the correct assessment of the species individual linkages to Arctic environmental conditions.
Benthic foraminiferal ecology and traits
The term “trait” has been widely used when assessing ecosystem functioning. According to Violle et al. (2007) a trait is a well-defined measurable property of individual organisms (morphological, physiological or phenological), which can be used comparatively across species. Examples of frequently used traits in the marine realm are body size, mobility, and feeding habit33,34,35. The term “trait” is not to be confused with the “traits” often used in genetic studies of foraminifera.
Overall, benthic foraminiferal faunas that flourish in low oxygen conditions are dominated by infaunal species, low diversities, and large standing stocks, potentially linked to low macrofauna presence resulting in lower predation and less competition12,36,37. The tests of benthic foraminiferal species living in such conditions are often small, perforated, flattened, elongated, rounded, planispiral, and translucent among others36,37,38,39 (e.g. Bolivina pseudopunctata). The infaunal benthic foraminiferal group is dominated by deposit-feeders capable of ingesting bacteria, degraded phytoplankton remains, and refractory organic matter40,41,42 (e.g. Melonis barleeanus and Lagenammina difflugiformis). However, some shallow infaunal benthic species have shown to increase their abundance as a response to summer primary production blooms12. Likewise, some low-oxygen tolerating species are frequently found dwelling several centimetres into the sediment, if the surface sediments are well-oxygenated11. These observations are in line with the conceptual TROX model (TRophic condition and OXygen concentration) which explains microhabitat distribution of benthic foraminifera43.
Well-oxygenated marine sediments are primarily occupied by epifaunal species with trochospiral tests (e.g. Cibicides lobatulus and Epistominella arctica) or milioline coiling (e.g. Miliolinella subrotunda and Triloculina tricarinata), benefitting from high fluxes of fresh phytoplankton particles12,44. In the Greenland-Norwegian Sea, high abundance of epibenthic species are linked to primary productivity blooms at the marginal ice-sea zone from late May to September44. Here, the benthic species rapidly utilize the settling of planktonic particles and show high metabolic activity with food vacuoles full of diatoms and dinoflagellates12,44.
Research also shows a link between the pore surface area of epifaunal foraminiferal tests and dissolved oxygen concentrations45,46,47,48. A strong negative logarithmic correlation between pore surface area and bottom-water oxygen concentrations were observed, implicating the potential of reconstructing deep sea oxygen levels and redox conditions based on pore surface area of fossil epifaunal benthic foraminifera45. Pore traits were only assigned to calcareous species in our study, since agglutinated foraminifera generally do not have pores and little knowledge exist on the perforation of Arctic agglutinated benthic foraminifera.
Some benthic foraminiferal species tolerate anoxic and sulfidic conditions49,50,51. Some genera (e.g., Bolivina and Stainforthia) do not only tolerate these harsh conditions; anoxia appears to stimulate the species cellular activity51. They are even capable of conducting test calcification during these anaerobic circumstances46,52. According to Van der Zwaan et al. (1999) a link between oxygen and substrate preferences has been established for certain species; some oxygen deficiency tolerant species typically reside in muddy substrates, as the oxygen penetration depth is dependent on the sediments grain size distribution. Coarse, sandy substrates have deeper oxygen penetration depths as opposed to clayey muddy sea floors53.
The primary food source for benthos comprise the organic fraction produced by pelagic production12,13,14. In the Arctic and Subarctic seas, the flux of these organic food particles from the surface to the bottom waters is short and intensive, followed by longer periods of starvation12. Some opportunistic benthic foraminiferal species appear to take advantage of these short lived organic material fluxes, often resulting in low diversity faunas14,53. Further information on the traits of various species is provided in Supplementary Table S2.
Regional settings
Modern oceanography, sea-ice configuration and surface water productivity
The Northeast Greenland shelf is influenced by meltwater outflows from drainage of the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream (NEGIS), which ends in three large marine terminating glaciers (Fig. 1). Combined, they drain approximately 12% of the Greenland Ice Sheet54. In the subsurface on the Northeast Greenland shelf, Atlantic water masses emanate from the northward flowing West Spitsbergen Current (WSC) (Fig. 1). When the WSC reaches 76–81°N, half of the WSC deflects westward across the Fram Strait transforming into the intermediate and shelf bound Return Atlantic Current (RAC)55,56. The other half of the WSC continues northward into the Arctic Ocean, where it recirculates57,58. This makes it both colder and fresher before returning to the Fram Strait now denoted Arctic Atlantic Water (AAW)59,60. The surface waters on the Northeast Greenland Shelf are comprised by Polar Water in the upper part of the southward flowing East Greenland Current (EGC), which flows along the shelf and is comprised by outflow water masses from the Arctic Ocean, drift ice, and meltwater61,62. The Polar Water is colder, and slightly fresher and more oxygen rich than the deeper Atlantic Water masses58.
The sea-ice configuration on the northeast Greenland shelf is highly controlled by the drift ice supply from the Arctic Ocean, conveyed by the Transpolar Drift and the EGC63. In winter, the majority of the shelf is covered in sea ice, in contrast to the summer months where the sea-ice extent is confined to the northernmost parts of the shelf (Fig. 1). Occasionally in summer, an area at 79° N remains ice-free, which relates to the seasonal opening of the coastal latent heat Northeast Water Polynya (NEW Polynya)64,65. Further south at Young Sound (74–75° N), the latent heat Sirius Water Polynya starts forming in winter and remains open until May66. When the polynyas are fully established, marine life flourishes, benefitting from the nutrients released by the melting sea-ice edge. In the northwestern Fram Strait region, the highest concentrations of chlorophyll a are linked to the NEW Polynya and the marginal sea-ice zone67. Consequently, polynyas are of crucial importance for high latitude marine ecosystems and act as carbon sinks68. Variations in light availability caused by large seasonal contrasts in both sunlight and sea-ice distribution play a pivotal role on primary production in the western Fram Strait69. Concurrently, surface freshening caused by melting of sea ice and elevated glacial meltwater flows alter the stratification and nutrient supply and with it the primary production, the marine food webs and the carbon cycle in Greenland coastal areas4. Moreover, the Polar Front coinciding with the marginal sea-ice zone, also serves as an area of enhanced phytoplankton productivity67. An extensive sea-ice cover is also regarded as playing a pivotal role in the regulation of bottom water oxygen content as it blocks the air-sea gas exchange70. Conversely, the loss of sea ice may foster greater local primary productivity, resulting in organic matter reaching the sea floor and subsequent aerobic microbial decomposition. This process could potentially lead to localized oxygen depletion in sediments and bottom waters70. The loss of sea ice is also often associated with rising sea surface temperatures in the Arctic. As bottom waters warm, they can hold less dissolved oxygen71. This temperature-driven reduction in oxygen solubility can lead to lower oxygen concentrations in the deep waters70. Additionally, when sea ice melts or decreases in extent, it can cause increased stratification in the water column. This stratification can result in reduced vertical mixing of water masses, which, in turn, limits the exchange of oxygen between surface and deeper waters72.
The deglaciation of the Northeast Greenland shelf
The retreat timing and pattern of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS) on the Northeast Greenland shelf region is still being studied, but it is clear that the timing of the retreat varied spatially across the Northeast Greenland shelf24,25,26,27,73,74,75. Based on the multiproxy record of core DA17-NG-ST01-019G (hereafter 019G; Fig. 1; Table 1) marine conditions were established already at 25.5 cal ka near the shelf edge at 79.4° N (Fig. 1; Table 1)24. The radiocarbon dates and lithology of core DA17-NG-ST14-171G (hereafter 171G; Fig. 1; Table 1) near the southern end of the NE Greenland shelf suggest that the GIS was already positioned landward of this core site by 12.2 cal ka BP28. Moreover, the inner Norske Trough (Fig. 1) was free from grounded ice by at least c. 13.4 cal ka BP26. Further north, in the outer Westwind Trough, NEGIS grounded ice had retreated by c. 13.3 cal ka BP27. A multi-proxy analysis of core DA17-NG-ST08-092G (092G) indicate the presence of a floating ice shelf at the inner Norske Trough area during the end of the last glacial26, whereas sedimentological characteristics of core DA17-NG-ST03-039G (039G) point to distal glaciomarine conditions from 13.3 to 11 cal ka BP27. Further south, a floating ice shelf was located close to core site 171G, according to the lithological features of the basal sedimentary unit28.
Material and methods
Study material
The marine sediment cores used in this study cover most of the Holocene and are retrieved from the Northeast Greenland shelf (Fig. 1, Table 1).
Assignment of benthic foraminiferal traits
For the purpose of this study we used seven published marine sediment cores and one new core (DA17-NG-ST12-135G) (Table 1, Fig. 1). For each marine sediment core, the associated benthic foraminiferal species were assigned certain traits based on previous ecological studies published in research papers and databases (see Table 2 and Table S1 in Supplementary). The included traits were defined for the majority of the benthic foraminiferal species present in the sediment cores (see Table S1 in Supplementary). In this study, the assignment of oxygen tolerances and living mode was primarily based on an extensive literature review; however, when no information on certain species’ oxygen tolerances and living modes were available, test morphology was applied (see Table 1). Nevertheless, this approach is correct in 75% of the cases76. For every core and for every sample depth, the benthic foraminiferal species were converted to traits. When possible, each species was assigned one of all the trait variations listed in Table 2. Each trait was treated separately; the trait variations were converted to percentages and summed up to a 100 percent for each trait. A full list of all the benthic foraminiferal species found in the material analysed for this paper and their assigned traits are listed in Table S1 in the Supplementary information.
Principal component analysis
A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted in MatLab to statistically evaluate the traits that explain most of the variability in the datasets. For this, the percentage data for each trait was normalized to z-scores \({z}_{i}=\frac{{x}_{i}-\overline{x}}{s }\), where s is the standard deviation.
Rate of change analysis
The R-Ratepool (version 0.6.1) R package was used to determine the rate-of-change in the benthic foraminiferal traits data77. The R-Ratepool is a powerful numerical tool to estimate rapid changes in chronological data sets with changing temporal resolution. All data sets are smoothed and binned into working units with a moving window before the rate-of-change calculations. The rate-of-change is then calculated between adjacent working units as a dissimilarity coefficient. Significant rate-of-change peak points are detected by using a “non-linear trend” GAM method. Separate calculations of rate-of-change was carried out for the benthic foraminiferal trait percentage data in each core, as well as for each trait (living strategy, test material, substrate, perforation, dissolved oxygen requirements and food requirements). For a full description of the rate-of-change calculations, the reader is referred to the Supplementary information.
Results
Benthic foraminiferal traits of cores
In the principal component analysis of the trait data (Fig. 2 and Table S2 in Supplementary), PC1 can generally be linked to foraminiferal test material as well as food preferences. The PC2 axis separates the benthic foraminiferal oxygen preferences. For cores 039G, 073G, 092G, 171G, and 135G, high positive and negative loadings on the PC2 axes correspond to oxic and dysoxic/suboxic tolerating benthic foraminifera, respectively (Fig. 2). In relation, the imperforate and perforate traits for core 270 show high negative and positive loadings on PC2 (Fig. 2); perforate benthic foraminifera are able to tolerate low dissolved oxygen content as opposed to imperforate species45.
The highest scoring foraminiferal traits on the PC1 and PC2 time series show significant variability during the deglacial and Holocene period (ca. 12–11 cal ka BP) across all core sites (Fig. 3). This is also seen as a high rate-of-change identified in the peak point analysis of the separate traits (Fig. 3 and Fig. S1 in Supplementary): a large number of rate-of-change peak points is recorded in the traits of cores 092G, 039G, 171G, and 135G related to a transition in the overall abundance of oxic to dysoxic/suboxic tolerating benthic foraminiferal species. In comparison, species that prefer fresh food particles are abundant during the glacial (from 14 to 12 cal ka BP) at core sites 092G, 135G, 171G, 019G, and 039G (Fig. 3 and Fig. S1 in Supplementary).
From 10 to 9 cal ka BP, the traits in cores 039G, 270, and 171G show significant changes in the peak point detection analysis (Fig. 3 and Figures in Supplementary). Yet, the shifts do not occur within the same traits in the different cores. In core 039G, a decline in species preferring fresh food and a slight increase in species that feed on older organic matter is recorded during this time. Further south, the benthic foraminiferal fauna in core 270 shows a peak in fresh food and suboxic species alongside a sudden turnover from perforate to imperforate species at ca. 9.8 cal ka BP, followed by higher abundances of oxic species. The test material changes logged by the rate-of-change point analysis in core 171G are rapid and correspond to a few data points.
The traits in cores 039G, 073G, 092G, 270, and 019G show significant changes between 8 and 6 cal ka BP (Fig. 3 and Supplementary). Overall, a gradual turnover from a predominantly calcareous to an agglutinated fauna occur in the majority of the cores (019G, 092G, 073G, 039G) during this time. Relatively high number of rate-of-change peak points in the oxygen trait preferences in cores 019G and 073G point to significant changes and mark a transition towards dominance by dysoxia tolerant species. Adding to this, a gradual rise in dysoxic species is also observed at core sites 039G and 092G (Fig. 3 and Figs. S1, S2, S4 in Supplementary). Concurrently, cores 039G, 019G, and 073G exhibit a significant decline in species that prefer fresh food particles. Albeit the rate-of-change point analysis did not record significant changes in food preferences in core 092G, a decline in the fresh food preferring species is observed (Fig. S4 in Supplementary).
In the late Holocene (ca. 5 to 0 cal ka BP), shifts to a predominantly agglutinated, oxic and low food tolerant fauna are recorded in core 135G. Minor variability is also evident in cores 073G and 092G, where infaunal species become dominant between 3 and 2 cal ka BP in core 092G and between 2 and 1 cal ka BP in core 073G (Figs. S3 and S4 in Supplementary).
Discussion
According to studies on benthic foraminiferal ecology, oxygen concentrations and food availability appear to be the two largest controlling factors on species distribution40,53,78,79,80. In fact, the link between benthic foraminiferal species distribution and water temperature and salinity is often too weak for detailed reconstructions of paleo environments (e.g.53,81). In the Arctic and North Atlantic region, similar conclusions have been made based on studies of both dead and stained benthic foraminiferal species, where different faunas were not directly linked to certain water temperatures or salinities, but rather to food supply 78,82,83. Dissolved oxygen is considered to control the absence and presence of certain species53, whereas increasing fluxes of organic matter cause proportional increases in abundance14,53. Especially opportunistic species benefitting from fresh food pulses can reproduce rapidly and thereby increase their abundance significantly84. Changes in the advection of the different water masses can also alter the bottom water oxygen content85. Additionally, the amount of dissolved oxygen at the sea floor is coupled with organic matter fluxes; high organic matter fluxes lead to low levels of oxygen at the sea floor due to organic matter degradation. Thus, distinguishing the effect of these two parameters can be difficult in the benthic foraminiferal traits.
While most benthic foraminiferal species have certain environmental requirements, not all are stenotopic. Many species are motile and can change their living position during times of stress. Some species tolerate a wide range of oxygen and food conditions but might have specific preferences under which they thrive. Nonetheless, the richness of species is highest in the top cm of the sea-floor sediments where higher food concentrations are available53. When oxygen becomes a limiting parameter at the sea floor, the epifaunal species are the first to disappear86. Under such circumstances, the burial efficiency of organic matter increases by 30%, beneficial for the true infaunal benthic foraminifera87.
Our results show that several changes in the benthic foraminiferal traits occurred across the shelf during the deglacial and Holocene period. Based on our PCA results, we suggest that overall, dissolved oxygen is the main abiotic environmental factor controlling the benthic foraminiferal faunal distribution during the deglacial and Holocene period. The second-most important factor seems to be food type preference.
Response of benthic foraminiferal traits to environmental changes
The deglacial-Holocene transition (14–11 cal ka BP)
Throughout the end of the last glacial period (14–12 cal ka BP), benthic foraminiferal faunas that prefer oxic and low food conditions (cores 092G, 039G, 171G, 019G, and 135G) appear to dominate the shelf (Fig. 3). The disappearance of grounded ice and extensive sea-ice cover on the Northeast Greenland shelf might have caused low surface water productivity and sporadic fluxes of organic matter, causing low utilization of dissolved oxygen by aerobic organic matter degradation at the sea floor (cf.53). Erratic pulses of organic matter is utilized by species preferring fresh food88,89, as seen in cores 135G, 039G, 171G, and 019G.
The deglacial-Holocene transition (12–11 cal ka BP) marks rapid and significant changes in the traits of cores 092G, 039G, 171G, and 135G, where turnovers from oxic to dysoxic/suboxic species are observed. The sudden increase in air temperatures and landward retreat of the NEGIS (Fig. 4g, d)26,30,90 might have prompted increased primary production and thus a stronger food flux to the sea floor. The organic matter degradation at the sea floor caused lower oxygen content (cf.53), which dysoxic/suboxic species benefit from. Changes in ocean water mass flux may also have influenced the bottom-water oxygen content. Less influx of the relatively oxygen-rich Polar water component in exchange for a stronger Atlantic water advection might have caused reduced bottom water oxygen conditions. The investigations of the benthic foraminiferal species distributions of cores 092G, 039G, 171G, and 019G could primary decipher that the assemblages during the deglacial (14–12 cal ka BP) point to advection of relatively warmer Atlantic waters and cold surface water conditions24, 26,27,28. Thus, the interpretations based on the presence of the most dominant species during this time do not comment on the relatively high dissolved oxygen conditions as suggested by our trait interpretations. However, sporadic food pulses were detected at core sites 039G and 171G from 12 to 11 cal ka BP, related to the presence of specific indicator species27,28. Opposite, for core site 092G, the benthic foraminiferal assemblage analysis did not register the low food flux that we observed in the traits26 (Fig. 3 and Fig. S4 in Supplementary). The original benthic foraminiferal studies of cores 039G and 171G mention significant changes in the species distribution during the deglacial-Holocene transition (12–11 ka cal BP)27,28. However, in these assemblage studies the additional link to a change from oxic to dysoxic bottom-water conditions, as our trait data suggests, could not be seen. This demonstrates that further information can be extracted from the benthic foraminiferal trait data during this time.
Early-Mid Holocene warm period (11–6 cal ka BP)
Following the deglacial-Holocene transition, changes in the traits are controlled by regional environmental changes. From 10 to 9 cal ka BP several significant rate-of-change peak points are detected in cores 039G, 270 and 171G (Fig. 3). During this time, the Northeast Greenland shelf was subjected to high air temperatures, marginal sea-ice zone conditions and a NEGIS grounding zone located at the present day position (Fig. 4)29,30,32,90. These overall warm conditions affected the traits in distinct ways across the core sites. At core site 039G in the outer Westwind Trough, a shift from opportunistic fresh food benthic foraminifera to species able to utilize older organic matter is recorded (Fig. 3 and Fig. S2 in Supplementary). This is possibly related to the distant position and continuous landward retreat of the NEGIS (Fig. 4d), also indicated by lower sedimentation rates at core site 039G and a reduced sea-ice cover (Fig. 4b), fostering elevated surface primary production27,30,32. Enhanced surface water production, possibly related to changes in sea-ice configurations and/or changes in the advection of water masses increased the organic matter fluxes, which lead to increased consumption of oxygen at the sediment–water interface45,83. This could explain the relatively high numbers of infaunal benthic foraminiferal species utilizing degraded organic material53,86. Sporadic fluxes of food is recorded in the interpretations based on species distribution of core 039G related to a sea-ice environment with open water conditions27.
At the inner Northeast Greenland shelf, the laminated sediments in cores 270 and 092G reflect glacial proximal conditions with the presence of an ice tongue26,74. No significant changes are recorded in the traits of core 092G, despite core 270 showing several changes, potentially reflecting the very low sedimentation rates and low temporal resolution of core 092G. The changeover from a fresh food and suboxic dominated assemblage to a fauna with increasing numbers of imperforate oxic species might be a response to glacial and ice tongue proximity, prohibiting primary production and reduced sinking of organic particles, leading to well-oxygenated conditions at the sea floor45,53. A changeover to well-oxygenated bottom-waters is not recorded in the interpretations of the benthic species distributions during this time of core 27074.
In the southern-most core (171G), high biogenic silica concentrations points to an early Sirius Water Polynya formation and increased surface water production28. Based on this, the sporadic peaks in agglutinated species relate to corrosive brine formations prohibiting growth of calcareous tests28,91.
During the early part of the Mid Holocene (8–6 cal ka BP), widespread changes occurred in the traits across the shelf. The NEGIS was at its lowest Holocene extent, whilst high air temperatures prevailed in North and East Greenland inferred from pollen records coeval to reduced sea-ice conditions based on rare driftwood occurrences in North Greenland and a low PIIIIP25 (Fig. 4)29,30,31,32. The common significant changes in the traits across core sites relate to the shift in dominance of calcareous to agglutinated species in cores 019G, 092G, 073G, and 039G concurrently to a change towards a dysoxic tolerating fauna. The combination of increasing agglutinated individuals and dysoxia tolerating species together with low frequencies of fresh food preferring species might be linked to less fresh labile organic matter input from primary production. Agglutinated species are more opportunistic than calcareous species and can tolerate a lower food quality13,91,92. On the other hand, oxidation of organic matter can also lead to dissolution of calcareous tests and cause low dissolved oxygen levels at the sea floor91,93,94.
The interpretations based on benthic foraminiferal species distributions of cores 039G, 092G, 019G, and 073G relate the shift from calcareous to agglutinated species to a gradual decline in Atlantic water advection in favor of increased Polar water influence following overall warm bottom-water conditions24,25,26,27. The transition from fresh food to old organic matter preferring species is discussed in26 and27, based on changes in indicator species. However, the concurrent increasing numbers of dysoxic species is not noticed using the traditional assemblage analyses in any of the previous work24,25,26,27. Here we show that, while a change occurred in the dominant water mass, bottom-water oxygenation and food-availability played a significant role.
Mid to Late Holocene changes (6–0 cal ka BP)
The later part of the Holocene on the Northeast Greenland shelf is characterized by declining air temperatures, lower solar insolation, a readvance of the NEGIS, and an expansion of the sea-ice cover (Fig. 4). Exceptionally low primary production in conjunction with near perennial sea-ice conditions was followed by the final break-up of the 79NG ice shelf on the inner shelf at core site 27074. At core site 025 in the outer Westwind Trough, low ice rafted debris fluxes and increasing medium-sized silt percentages point to colder conditions and deposition of sea-ice sediments75. The fining of the sortable silt implies a weakening of the bottom currents, interpreted as lower advection of Atlantic-sourced water masses75. Contemporarily decreasing planktonic δ18O at core site 025 and increasing IP25 and HBI III values on the North Icelandic Shelf suggest a EGC strengthening and a south-eastward expansion of the Arctic front95.
Overall, only few significant rate-of change points are recorded in the traits. This is partially due to a lower temporal resolution in the datasets in many of the cores caused by lower sedimentation rates. Further, the benthic foraminiferal records for cores 039G and 270 end at 3.9 and 1.7 cal ka BP, respectively. The most extensive changes occur in core 135G at the outer Norske Trough (Figs. 1 and 3). Here, an agglutinated fauna is dominant together with oxic and low food tolerant species. Low phytoplankton productivity together with harsh sea-ice conditions might have impeded a strong organic matter flux to the sea floor resulting in oligotrophic conditions, while brine formation may have contributed to carbonate dissolution as also seen in the present-day foraminiferal assemblages80. However, more high-resolution benthic foraminiferal records from this time period are required in order to fully assess the effect of the NE Greenland environmental changes on the benthic foraminiferal traits. Additionally, the low temporal resolution complicate the direct comparisons between interpretations based on assemblages and traits for the late Holocene.
Advantages of applying a trait-based approach and future perspectives
This is the first case study of applying a benthic foraminiferal trait-based approach to assess past benthic ecosystem alterations as a response to drastic global and regional climate changes in the Arctic. There are many advantages in replacing benthic foraminiferal species by their traits. Trait composition might contribute with more information about the overall state of benthic ecosystems, compared to examining benthic foraminiferal species distributions alone. The main advantages of a trait-based approach is that traits represent key aspects of the regional physical environment96. In our study, we showed that vital parameters (e.g., food availability and dissolved oxygen) for ecosystem functioning changed throughout the deglacial and Holocene period as a response to climate-driven factors (increasing air temperatures, retreating ice sheet and sea ice). For example, during the deglacial period, our trait analyses captured relatively high dissolved bottom-water oxygen conditions together with sporadic fluxes of organic matter across the NE Greenland shelf, which was not noticed in the assemblage studies24,25,26,27,28,74. Additionally, the deglacial-Holocene transition marked a changeover from oxic to suboxic conditions based on our trait reconstructions, where only few of the assemblage studies mention changes in food flux and none leave any comments on changes in oxygen conditions. Further, during the Mid Holocene period, our trait-based approach recorded periods where the oxygen conditions changed, which again was not mentioned in the assemblage studies. Therefore, trait-based analyses allows the reconstruction of past bottom water oxygen conditions, which is often not as clearly seen in assemblage analyses. Hence, trait-based analyses may provide different regional information that might otherwise be overlooked, when studying benthic foraminiferal assemblages in the traditional way in paleoceanographic studies.
Studies indicate that the responses in functional traits (observational traits that influence organismal and ecosystem processes and performance33) are observed earlier compared to at the taxonomic level, when impacted by environmental changes97. However, in order to use benthic foraminiferal traits in this context, a standardized trait terminology and methodology must be established. This will allow broad scale comparability between changes in certain benthic foraminiferal traits at targeted time periods. A robust catalogue of benthic foraminiferal traits allows for trait-based modelling to understand and predict ecosystem dynamics, based on well-defined relationships between traits and environmental factors.
Summary and conclusions
In this study, we assigned traits to benthic foraminiferal species from marine sediment cores retrieved across the Northeast Greenland shelf covering the deglacial and Holocene period. Principal component analyses and rate-of-change calculations were applied to the trait datasets to resolve which traits explain most of the variability and to determine significant temporal changes in the traits. According to our results, bottom water oxygen, test material, and food preferences explain most of the variability in the datasets. Additionally, the rate-of-change results show that several significant changes occurred in the traits during the past ~ 14,000 years, linked to changes in external forcing mechanisms.
During the deglacial period, our results show that benthic foraminiferal species that prefer well-oxygenated bottom-waters and low food conditions dominated the shelf, potentially related to the disappearing of proximal grounded ice and perennial sea ice, causing sporadic fluxes of organic matter to the seafloor. A significant change is marked during the deglacial-Holocene transition across the shelf, where a changeover from high oxic to suboxic tolerating species is recorded in our trait analyses. This changeover was potentially caused by a combination of drastically increasing air temperatures and the continuous retreat of the Northeast Greenland Ice stream, promoting elevated primary production and high fluxes of organic material to the sea floor.
The Early Holocene warm period was characterized by high air temperatures, reduced sea-ice conditions and the NEGIS at its present-day position. During this time, the traits responded to different local environmental conditions across the shelf, related to differences in the proximity of the NEGIS ice tongue, polynya formation and sea-ice.
During the Middle Holocene, a shift from a calcareous to an agglutinated and dysoxic tolerating fauna occurred in several cores. This was linked to less input of fresh labile organic matter, which agglutinated foraminifera benefitted from. However, oxidation of organic matter can also lead to dissolution of calcareous tests and cause low dissolved oxygen conditions.
The Late Holocene marks a period were only few significant trait changes occurred. This is potentially related to the fewer data points in this period.
In general, the benthic foraminiferal assemblage-based results and interpretations on the same data set as analysed here do not comment on changes in dissolved oxygen conditions at the sea floor, and only few studies recorded changes in food supply. Thus, applying a trait-based approach might capture key changes in past bottom-water oxygen conditions that traditional benthic foraminiferal assemblage studies do not record. However, the trait-based method faces several weaknesses; not all traits can be assigned to all species due to the lack of knowledge on ecological preferences of certain benthic foraminiferal species. Most species have specific preferences under which they thrive, yet some species can change their traits in response to different environmental conditions.
This case study represents one of the first studies in the Arctic to apply a trait-based method to reconstruct deglacial and Holocene changes in benthic ecosystems as a response to changes in climate and environment. Our study underscores the value of using benthic foraminiferal traits to complement traditional species assemblage analyses in understanding the response of benthic ecosystems to environmental changes.
Data availability
All foraminiferal data from the marine sediment cores are available from the PANGAEA database or as supporting information in the original publications except for the foraminiferal data of core DA17-NG-ST12-135G, which is unpublished.
References
Hersbach, H. et al. ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). In Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) (2023). https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47.
Constable, A. J. et al. Cross-chapter paper 6: Polar regions. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Eds. Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2022).
Frey, K. E., Comiso, J. C., Cooper, L. W., Grebmeier, J. M. & Stock, L. V. Arctic Ocean Primary Productivity: The Response of Marine Algae to Climate Warming and Sea Ice Decline (2021). https://doi.org/10.25923/kxhb-dw16.
Hopwood, M. J. et al. Non-linear response of summertime marine productivity to increased meltwater discharge around Greenland. Nat. Commun. 9, 122 (2018).
Birchenough, S. N. R. et al. Climate change and marine benthos: A review of existing research and future directions in the North Atlantic. WIREs Clim. Chang. 6, 203–223 (2015).
Solan, M., Archambault, P., Renaud, P. E. & März, C. The changing Arctic Ocean: Consequences for biological communities, biogeochemical processes and ecosystem functioning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 378, 20200266 (2020).
Duarte, C. M. et al. Tipping elements in the Arctic marine ecosystem. Ambio 41, 44–55 (2012).
Siddon, E. C., Zador, S. G. & Hunt, G. L. Ecological responses to climate perturbations and minimal sea ice in the northern Bering Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 181–182, 104914 (2020).
Heinze, C. et al. The quiet crossing of ocean tipping points. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2008478118 (2021).
Fetter, C. Recent deep-sea benthic foraminifera from the Alpha Ridge Province of the Arctic Ocean. In Benthic Ecology of the High Arctic Deep Sea (Eds. Paul, A. Z. & Menzies, R. L.). 297–337 (Rep. Dept. Oceanography, Florida State University, 1973).
Wiedmann, I. et al. What feeds the Benthos in the Arctic Basins? Assembling a carbon budget for the deep Arctic Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 31 (2020).
Gooday, A. J., Levin, L. A., Linke, P. & Heeger, T. The role of Benthic Foraminifera in deep-sea food webs and carbon cycling BT. In Deep-Sea Food Chains and the Global Carbon Cycle (Eds. Rowe, G. T. & Pariente, V.). 63–91 (Springer Netherlands, 1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2452-2_5.
Murray, J. W. Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Gooday, A. J. A response by benthic Foraminifera to the deposition of phytodetritus in the deep sea. Nature 332, 70–73 (1988).
Culver, S. J. & Lipps, J. H. Predation on and by Foraminifera. In Predator—Prey Interactions in the Fossil Record (Eds. Kelley, P. H., Kowalewski, M. & Hansen, T. A.). 7–32 (Springer, 2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0161-9_2.
Nomaki, H. et al. Benthic foraminifera as trophic links between phytodetritus and benthic metazoans: Carbon and nitrogen isotopic evidence. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 357, 153–164 (2008).
Hevia, V. et al. Trait-based approaches to analyze links between the drivers of change and ecosystem services: Synthesizing existing evidence and future challenges. Ecol. Evol. 7, 831–844 (2017).
Smit, K. P., Bernard, A. T. F., Lombard, A. T. & Sink, K. J. Assessing marine ecosystem condition: A review to support indicator choice and framework development. Ecol. Indic. 121, 107148 (2021).
Lavorel, S., McIntyre, S., Landsberg, J. & Forbes, T. D. A. Plant functional classifications: From general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 474–478 (1997).
Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H. & Woodward, F. I. Plant Functional Types: Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Lutze, G. F., Pflaumann, U. & Weinholz, P. Jungquartäre Fluktuationen der benthischen Foraminiferenfauna in Tiefsee-Sedimenten vor NW-Afrika—Eine Reaktion auf Produktivitätsänderungen im Oberfächenwasser. Meteor Forschungsergebnisse R. C. Geol. Geophys. 40, 163–180 (1986).
Lutze, G. F. & Coulbourn, W. T. Recent benthic foraminifera from the continental margin of northwest Africa: Community structure and distribution. Mar. Micropaleontol. 8, 361–401 (1984).
Kaufman, D. et al. Holocene global mean surface temperature, a multi-method reconstruction approach. Sci. Data 7, 1–13 (2020).
Rasmussen, T. L., Pearce, C., Andresen, K. J., Nielsen, T. & Seidenkrantz, M.-S. Northeast Greenland (79.4°N): Ice-free shelf edge during the Last Glacial Maximum 25.5–17.5 ka. Boreas 51, 759–775 (2022).
Pados-Dibattista, T., Pearce, C., Detlef, H., Brendtsen, J. & Seidenkrantz, M.-S. Holocene paleoceanography of the Northeast Greenland shelf. Clim. Past 18, 103–127 (2022).
Davies, J. et al. Linkages between ocean circulation and the Northeast Greenland ice stream in the Early Holocene. Quat. Sci. Rev. 286, 34 (2022).
Hansen, K. E. et al. Deglacial to Mid Holocene environmental conditions on the northeastern Greenland shelf, western Fram Strait. Quat. Sci. Rev. 293, 107704 (2022).
Jackson, R. et al. Marine conditions and development of the Sirius Water polynya on the North-East Greenland shelf during the Younger Dryas-Holocene. Quat. Sci. Rev. (2022).
Gajewski, K. Quantitative reconstruction of Holocene temperatures across the Canadian Arctic and Greenland. Glob. Planet. Change 128, 14–23 (2015).
Larsen, N. K. et al. Instability of the Northeast Greenland ice stream over the last 45,000 years. Nat. Commun. 9, 3–10 (2018).
Funder, S. et al. A 10,000-year record of Arctic Ocean Sea-ice variability—View from the beach. Science (80-) 333, 747–751 (2011).
Syring, N. et al. Holocene changes in sea-ice cover and polynya formation along the eastern North Greenland shelf: New insights from biomarker records. Quat. Sci. Rev. 231, 106173 (2020).
Violle, C. et al. Let the concept of trait be functional!. Oikos 116, 882–892 (2007).
Degen, R. et al. Trait-based approaches in rapidly changing ecosystems: A roadmap to the future polar oceans. Ecol. Indic. 91, 722–736 (2018).
Reiss, J., Bridle, J. R., Montoya, J. M. & Woodward, G. Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 505–514 (2009).
Bernhard, J. M. Characteristic assemblages and morphologies of benthic foraminifera from anoxic, organic-rich deposits; Jurassic through Holocene. J. Foraminifer. Res. 16, 207–215 (1986).
Kaiho, K. Benthic foraminiferal dissolved-oxygen index and dissolved-oxygen levels in the modern ocean. Geology 22, 719–722 (1994).
Kaiho, K. Effect of organic carbon flux and dissolved oxygen on the benthic foraminiferal oxygen index (BFOI). Mar. Micropaleontol. 37, 67–76 (1999).
Corliss, B. H. & Chen, C. Morphotype patterns of Norwegian Sea deep-sea benthic foraminifera and ecological implications. Geology 16, 716–719 (1988).
Corliss, B. H. & Emerson, S. Distribution of rose bengal stained deep-sea benthic foraminifera from the Nova Scotian continental margin and Gulf of Maine. Deep Sea Res. Part A Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 37, 381–400 (1990).
Mackensen, A. & Douglas, R. G. Down-core distribution of live and dead deep-water benthic foraminifera in box cores from the Weddell Sea and the California continental borderland. Deep Sea Res. Part A. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 36, 879–900 (1989).
Corliss, B. H. Microhabitats of benthic foraminifera within deep-sea sediments. Nature 314, 435–438 (1985).
Jorissen, F. J., de Stigter, H. C. & Widmark, J. G. V. A conceptual model explaining benthic foraminiferal microhabitats. Mar. Micropaleontol. 26, 3–15 (1995).
Graf, G. et al. Benthic-pelagic coupling in the Greenland-Norwegian Sea and its effect on the geological record. Geol. Rundschau 84, 49–58 (1995).
Rathburn, A. E., Willingham, J., Ziebis, W., Burkett, A. M. & Corliss, B. H. A New biological proxy for deep-sea paleo-oxygen: Pores of epifaunal benthic foraminifera. Sci. Rep. 8, 9456 (2018).
Glock, N. Benthic foraminifera and gromiids from oxygen-depleted environments—Survival strategies, biogeochemistry and trophic interactions. Biogeosciences 20, 3423–3447 (2023).
Glock, N., Erdem, Z. & Schönfeld, J. The Peruvian oxygen minimum zone was similar in extent but weaker during the Last Glacial Maximum than Late Holocene. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 307 (2022).
Kuhnt, T. et al. Relationship between pore density in benthic foraminifera and bottom-water oxygen content. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 76, 85–95 (2013).
Gooday, A. J., Bernhard, J. M., Levin, L. A. & Suhr, S. B. Foraminifera in the Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zone and other oxygen-deficient settings: Taxonomic composition, diversity, and relation to metazoan faunas. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 47, 25–54 (2000).
Moodley, L., van der Zwaan, G. J., Herman, P. M. J. & Kempers, L. Differential response of benthic meiofauna to anoxia with special reference to Foraminifera (Protista: Sarcodina). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 158, 151–163 (1997).
Orsi, W. D. et al. Anaerobic metabolism of Foraminifera thriving below the seafloor. ISME J. 14, 2580–2594 (2020).
Nardelli, M. P. et al. Experimental evidence for foraminiferal calcification under anoxia. Biogeosciences 11, 4029–4038 (2014).
Van der Zwaan, G. J. et al. Benthic foraminifers: Proxies or problems?: A review of paleocological concepts. Earth-Sci. Rev. 46, 213–236 (1999).
Rignot, E. & Mouginot, J. Ice flow in Greenland for the International Polar Year 2008–2009. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, 112 (2012).
Hattermann, T., Isachsen, P. E., Von Appen, W. J., Albretsen, J. & Sundfjord, A. Eddy-driven recirculation of Atlantic Water in Fram Strait. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068323 (2016).
Marnela, M., Rudels, B., Houssais, M. N., Beszczynska-Möller, A. & Eriksson, P. B. Recirculation in the Fram Strait and transports of water in and north of the Fram Strait derived from CTD data. Ocean Sci. 9, 499–519 (2013).
Rudels, B., Jones, E. P., Anderson, L. G. & Kattner, G. On the intermediate depth waters of the Arctic Ocean. In The Polar Oceans and Their Role in Shaping the Global Environment (Eds. Johannessen, O. M., Muench, R. D. & Overland, J. E.). 33–46 (AGU, 1994). https://doi.org/10.1029/gm085p0033.
Willcox, E. W. et al. An updated view of the water masses on the Northeast Greenland shelf and their link to the Laptev Sea and Lena River. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 128, e2022JC019052 (2023).
Richter, M. E., Von Appen, W. J. & Wekerle, C. Does the East Greenland current exist in the northern Fram Strait?. Ocean Sci. 14, 1147–1165 (2018).
Schaffer, J. et al. Warm water pathways toward Nioghalvfjerdsfjorden Glacier, Northeast Greenland. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 122, 4004–4020 (2017).
Haine, T. W. N. et al. Arctic freshwater export: Status, mechanisms, and prospects. Glob. Planet. Change 125, 13–35 (2015).
Gjelstrup, C. V. B. et al. Vertical redistribution of principle water masses on the Northeast Greenland Shelf. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–12 (2022).
Smedsrud, L. H., Halvorsen, M. H., Stroeve, J. C., Zhang, R. & Kloster, K. Fram Strait sea ice export variability and September Arctic sea ice extent over the last 80 years. Cryosphere 11, 65–79 (2017).
Koch, L. The east Greenland ice. Meddelelser Grønl.-Geosci. 130, 1–373 (1945).
Vinje, T. E. Sea ice observations in 1969. Arb. Nor. Polarinstitut 5, 132–138 (1970).
Pedersen, J. B. T., Kaufmann, L. H., Kroon, A. & Jakobsen, B. H. The Northeast Greenland Sirius Water Polynya dynamics and variability inferred from satellite imagery. Geogr. Tidsskr. J. Geogr. 110, 131–142 (2010).
Hirche, H. J., Baumann, M. E. M., Kattner, G. & Gradinger, R. Plankton distribution and the impact of copepod grazing on primary production in Fram Strait, Greenland Sea. J. Mar. Syst. 2, 477–494 (1991).
Barber, D. G. & Massom, R. A. Chapter 1 The role of sea ice in Arctic and Antarctic polynyas. Elsevier Oceanogr. Ser. 74, 1–54 (2007).
Krisch, S. et al. The influence of Arctic Fe and Atlantic fixed N on summertime primary production in Fram Strait, North Greenland Sea. Sci. Rep. 10, 15230 (2020).
Cliff, E., Khatiwala, S. & Schmittner, A. Glacial deep ocean deoxygenation driven by biologically mediated air–sea disequilibrium. Nat. Geosci. 14, 43–50 (2021).
Breitburg, D. et al. Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science (80-) 359, eaam7240 (2018).
Joos, F., Plattner, G.-K., Stocker, T. F., Körtzinger, A. & Wallace, D. W. R. Trends in marine dissolved oxygen: Implications for ocean circulation changes and the carbon budget. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 84, 197–201 (2003).
Arndt, J. E., Jokat, W. & Dorschel, B. The last glaciation and deglaciation of the Northeast Greenland continental shelf revealed by hydro-acoustic data. Quat. Sci. Rev. 160, 45–56 (2017).
Syring, N. et al. Holocene interactions between glacier retreat, sea-ice formation and Atlantic water advection at the inner Northeast Greenland continental shelf. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatology https://doi.org/10.1029/2020pa004019 (2020).
Zehnich, M. et al. Environmental variability off NE Greenland (western Fram Strait) during the past 10,600 years. Holocene https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683620950393 (2020).
Jorissen, F. J. Benthic foraminiferal microhabitats below the sediment–water interface. In Modern Foraminifera (Ed. Sen Gupta, B. K.). 161–179 (Springer Netherlands, 1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48104-9_10.
Mottl, O. et al. Rate-of-change analysis in paleoecology revisited: A new approach. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 293, 104483 (2021).
Husum, K., Hald, M., Stein, R. & Weißschnur, M. Recent benthic foraminifera in the Arctic Ocean and Kara Sea continental margin. Arktos 5, 1–17 (2015).
Mackensen, A., Sejrup, H. P. & Jansen, E. The distribution of living benthic foraminifera on the continental slope and rise off southwest Norway. Mar. Micropaleontol. 9, 275–306 (1985).
Davies, J., Lloyd, J., Pearce, C. & Seidenkrantz, M.-S. Distribution of modern benthic foraminiferal assemblages across the Northeast Greenland continental shelf. Mar. Micropaleontol. 184, 102273 (2023).
Murray, J. W. Ecology and Palaeoecology of Benthic Foraminifera. (Longman Scientific & Technical, 1991).
Wollenburg, J. E. & Mackensen, A. Living benthic foraminifers from the central Arctic Ocean: Faunal composition, standing stock and diversity. Mar. Micropaleontol. 34, 153–185 (1998).
Wollenburg, J. E. & Kuhnt, W. The response of benthic foraminifers to carbon flux and primary production in the Arctic Ocean. Mar. Micropaleontol. 40, 189–231 (2000).
Alve, E. Benthic foraminiferal distribution and recolonization of formerly anoxic environments in Drammensfjord, southern Norway. Mar. Micropaleontol. 25, 169–186 (1995).
Hossain, A., Knorr, G., Jokat, W. & Lohmann, G. Opening of the Fram Strait led to the establishment of a modern-like three-layer stratification in the Arctic Ocean during the Miocene. Arktos 7, 1–12 (2021).
Den Dulk, M. et al. Benthic foraminiferal response to variations in surface water productivity and oxygenation in the northern Arabian Sea. Mar. Micropaleontol. 35, 43–66 (1998).
van der Weijden, C. H., Reichart, G. J. & Visser, H. J. Enhanced preservation of organic matter in sediments deposited within the oxygen minimum zone in the northeastern Arabian Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 46, 807–830 (1999).
Linke, P. Metabolic adaptations of deep-sea benthic foraminifera to seasonally varying food input. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 81, 51–63 (1992).
Schewe, I. & Soltwedel, T. Benthic response to ice-edge-induced particle flux in the Arctic Ocean. Polar Biol. 26, 610–620 (2003).
Buizert, C. et al. Greenland-wide seasonal temperatures during the last deglaciation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1905–1914 (2018).
Fossile, E. et al. Benthic foraminifera as tracers of brine production in the Storfjorden “sea ice factory’’. Biogeosciences 17, 1933–1953 (2020).
Jernas, P. et al. Annual changes in Arctic fjord environment and modern benthic foraminiferal fauna: Evidence from Kongsfjorden. Svalbard. Glob. Planet. Change 163, 119–140 (2018).
Archer, D., Emerson, S. & Reimers, C. Dissolution of calcite in deep-sea sediments: pH and O2 microelectrode results. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53, 2831–2845 (1989).
Emerson, S. R. et al. Calcium carbonate preservation in the ocean. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 331, 29–40 (1990).
Harning, D. J. et al. Response of biological productivity to North Atlantic marine front migration during the Holocene. Clim. Past 17, 379–396 (2021).
Kearns, L. E., Bohaty, S. M., Edgar, K. M., Nogué, S. & Ezard, T. H. G. Searching for function: Reconstructing adaptive niche changes using geochemical and morphological data in planktonic Foraminifera. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 78 (2021).
Gagic, V. et al. Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indices. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20142620 (2015).
GEBCO Compilation Group. GEBCO_2022 Grid. (2022). https://doi.org/10.5285/e0f0bb80-ab44-2739-e053-6c86abc0289c.
Nagler, T., Rott, H., Hetzenecker, M., Wuite, J. & Potin, P. The Sentinel-1 mission: New opportunities for ice sheet observations. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70709371 (2015).
Williams, T., Korosov, A., Rampal, P. & Ólason, E. Presentation and evaluation of the Arctic sea ice forecasting system neXtSIM-F. Cryosphere 15, 3207–3227. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3207-2021 (2021).
Daewel, U. & Schrum, C. Simulating long-term dynamics of the coupled North Sea and Baltic Sea ecosystem with ECOSMO II: Model description and validation. J. Mar. Syst. 119-120, 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2013.03.008 (2013).
Samuelsen, A., Hansen, C. & Wehde, H. Tuning and assessment of the HYCOM-NORWECOM V2.1 biogeochemical modeling system for the North Atlantic and Arctic oceans. Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 2187–2202. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2187-2015 (2015).
Uitz, J., Claustre, H., Morel, A. & Hooker, S. B. Vertical distribution of phytoplankton communities in open ocean: An assessment based on surface chlorophyll. J. Geophys. Res. 111, C08005. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003207 (2006).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully thank the captain, crew and scientific party of the NorthGreen 2017 scientific cruise onboard RV Dana. We would also like to thank Tuomas Junna for conducting the benthic foraminiferal datasets for core DA17-NG-ST12-135G. We are also grateful to the two anonymous reviewers as well as to the editor Jutta Wollenburg for their excellent comments and suggestions for improvement of the manuscript. This study was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 869383 (ECOTIP) (MSS) and the Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant no. 0135-00165B (GreenShelf).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.E.H. wrote the main manuscript and prepared the figures with substantial input from M.S.-S. and C.P. K.E.H. carried out the statistical analyses. K.E.H., M.S.-S. and C.P. designed the study. All authors contributed to the interpretation and discussion of the data. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hansen, K.E., Pearce, C. & Seidenkrantz, MS. Response of Arctic benthic foraminiferal traits to past environmental changes. Sci Rep 13, 22135 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47603-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47603-w
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.