Abstract
A mastectomy is a curative treatment for breast cancer. It causes breast and soft tissue deficits, resulting in a chest with poor vascularity. Autologous tissue breast reconstruction is commonly associated with donor site morbidity. Breast implants are another reconstruction alternative, but they are associated with infection, rupture, and the need for replacement. Autologous aspirated fat grafting has appeared as an ideal breast reconstruction method, but low graft viability and high resorption remain as the main shortcomings. We developed a novel method for fat-only grafts using cultured mature adipocytes (CMAs) mixed with their condition medium. Twenty-five mastectomy patients, aged 32–72 years, received a mixed grafting of CMAs, MCP1-containing condition medium, and fat grafts for total breast reconstruction. In follow-up periods of 24–75 months, MRI analysis showed full thickness fat-engraftment. The cell proliferation marker Ki67 was negative in post-transplant biopsy specimens from all patients. Aesthetic full breast morphology was achieved, patient satisfaction was evaluated 1 year and 3–6 years after surgery. All grafts were confirmed safe, demonstrating high reliability and long-term sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The incidence of breast cancer has been increasing worldwide in recent years1,2. A mastectomy is a curative treatment for breast cancer, but can leave patients with pain and abnormal feeling due to contracture and can have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients1,2. Although autologous tissue flaps or artificial breast implants are commonly used for breast reconstruction after a mastectomy3,4,5, autologous tissue flaps are surgically invasive, and tissue is widely lost at the donor site4,5. As such, reconstruction using breast implants is more popular5,6,7, despite being associated with complications caused by the artificial material (infection, capsule contracture, and rupture) and the need to be replaced after several years6,7. Recently, the risk of developing breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)8,9 has also been reported. The number of patients trying to avoid the risks associated with breast implants has increased, and new treatments are being explored. Recently, aspirated fat grafts have attracted attention as an ideal breast reconstruction method with minimum invasive surgery and less donor site morbidity10,11. However, an optimal method for fat grafts is yet to be established. This is because a mastectomy involves the removal of a large amount of tissue, which in turn requires an equally large amount of fat filling to correct the defect. In addition, poor vascular distribution at the recipient site makes it difficult for the fat graft to survive.
While fat grafting is a very useful tool in the surgeon's options, a major problem is the unpredictable degree of resorption and volume loss, with reported survival rates ranging from 20 to 90%12,13,14,15. It is also known that after fat grafting, necrotic fat grafts are often recognized as foreign bodies and cause absorption, calcification, lipo-necrotic cysts, and abscesses16,17,18,19.
Cell-assisted lipo-transfer (CAL), on the other hand, has been used as a method to increase the engraftment rate for transplanting adipose tissue with small vessel fraction (SVF) containing adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs)20,21,22. In systematic reviews of CAL to the breast, graft retention varied in the range of 40–80% within one year, and complications were at a rate of 37%22,23,24,25.
Although the focus has hitherto been on increasing blood vessels because blood flow is required for fat graft survival, we hypothesized that the role macrophages play in angiogenesis and adipogenesis would be the key factor for the survival of fat grafts. Macrophages are required for angiogenesis and adipogenesis, they are the third most important component of adipose tissue and are deeply involved in the regulation of adipose formation26,27,28. It has been reported that maturation is impaired in the fat of SIRT1-deficient mice. This was thought to be due to impaired angiogenesis as well as fewer intra-adipose macrophages. Intravenous injection of a reagent that inhibits macrophages (clodronate liposomes) in normal mice has been shown to reduce macrophages in adipose tissue and inhibit angioplasty28. This indicates that macrophages are essential cells for the complete formation of adipose tissue.
In addition, MCP-1 has been reported to be important for increasing macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue29,30,31. This has been demonstrated by the fact that MCP-1 (CCL2) produced in adipose tissue attracts macrophages to tissues in mice lacking the CCR2 receptor31. Thus, we decided to use CMAs, which secrete high concentrations of MCP-1 and were expected to further enhance angiogenic and adipogenic potential.
Since 2010, 67 partial breast reconstructions and breast augmentations have been performed with a mixture of CMAs, MCP1-containing conditioned medium, and fat grafts (hereafter referred as CMAM-FGs). The fat engraftment rate of CMAM-FGs was over 90%, and no adverse events occurred. Therefore, CMAM-FGs were applied to whole breast reconstruction after mastectomy, where the efficacy and safety of the treatment were evaluated.
Results
Human mature adipocyte culture
The subjects of this study were 25 patients who had previously undergone a mastectomy. Approximately 3 cc of microfat was harvested from the patient’s lower abdomen by subcutaneous aspiration (Fig. 1A). Human mature adipocytes (2–3 × 106 cells) were isolated from 2.8 ± 0.9 cc and were cultured at a density of approximately 4 to 5 × 104/ cm2. The total number of transplanted cells in the clinical application was 884.20 × 107, with a mean value of 17.00 × 107 ± 3.09 × 107. (The total number of transplanted cells in the first application was 395.02 × 107 with a mean of 15.80 × 107 ± 2.33 × 107, the total number of transplanted cells in the second application was 446.28 × 107 with a mean of 17.85 × 107 ± 3.31 × 107, and the third application was only performed in two patients, bringing the total number of transplanted cells to 42.90 × 107 with a mean of 21.45 × 107 ± 0).
Cultured mature adipocytes retained a large amount of fat granules that appeared light in phase contrast micrographs (Fig. 1B). Adipocytes were specifically stained red with Sudan III, indicating that mature adipocytes incorporated fat granules (Fig. 1C).
Cultured mature adipocytes (CMAs) expressed VEGFR2 and PDGFRβ in immuno-histological analysis in vitro
Both CMAs alone and CMAs plus aspirated fat graft yielded results showing the presence of cells with strong vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and platelet derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDGFRβ) expression (Fig. 1D). VEGFR2 is a protein expressed only in vascular endothelial cells, and its progenitor cells are the primary responders to VEGF signaling, indicating that blood vessels were being formed. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) is mostly expressed in white adipose tissue, where it works as one of the master regulators of adipogenesis32. PDGFRβ is expressed when its PPARγ in adipose progenitor cells is stimulated by fatty acids or other substances. Therefore, the presence of cells with strong PDGFRβ expressions showed that they included adipose progenitor cells.
Cell-surface marker characterization of CMAs and SVF cells
We performed flow cytometry to characterize the cell-surface marker profile of CMA mixed populations. The MSC markers CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD166 were analyzed (Fig. 2). Most marker expressions of CMAs were similar to those of SVF cells. However, CD90 expression showed significant differences. Higher CD90 expression was observed in CMAs (93.7%, MFI 3863.56) compared with SVF cells (82.47%, MFI 1996.94). For CD44, there was not much difference in the positive rate between the two groups, but more cells in CMAs showed higher expression levels.
Cytokine/chemokine analysis in vitro
In CM chemokine/cytokine analysis (n = 6), MCP-1 (16.15 ± 2.65 ng/ml) was produced in the largest amount, followed by GRO (8.97 ± 3.20 ng/ml), IL-8 (7.09 ± 1.17 ng/ml), VEGF (1.09 ± 0.43) ng/ml) and IL6(1.17 ± 0.48 ng/ml) was also produced. Conversely, hardly any TNF-α, IL-1-β, or INF-γ, which cause inflammation, was produced in the CMAs (Fig. 3).
Cultured mature adipocyte aging examination in vitro
A population doubling level (PDL) cell aging test was conducted to confirm the safety of the CMAs from six randomly chosen patients. It was confirmed that CMAs were cultured until they stopped growing (PDL: 55.84 ± 17.63) due to cell aging (61–102 days; 75.67 ± 18.00) (Fig. 4). The results showed that CMAs proceeded to terminal differentiation and stopped proliferating, so the possibility of malignant change (tumorigenesis) was not observed.
Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical analysis of regenerated fat after the CMAM-FGs in-vivo
Six months to 2 years after CMAM-FGs were transplanted into the chest by injection, biopsy specimens were stained using anti-perilipin fluorescent immunostaining, which is expressed on the cell membrane of adipocytes (Fig. 5A). The results showed that adipose tissue was formed throughout the reconstructed area. After transplantation, the reconstructed fat was rich in macrophages, which were positive in anti-CD68 staining (Fig. 5B). Anti-CD31 and CD34 immunostaining showed many blood vessels in the regenerated tissue (Fig. 5C,D). Cell proliferation marker Ki67 (Fig. 5E), an important molecular target in the diagnosis of cancer33, was negative in the biopsy specimens of all patients.
Clinical outcomes
The patient summary and clinical results are shown in Table 1. The average engraftment rate of the transplanted CMAM-FGs for the 25 patients was 99.16 ± 4.00%, no postoperative complications were observed in any of the 25 patients. Patients were followed for 2–6 years, and no complications, adverse events or breast cancer recurrences were noted. The graft retention was stable for all patients, and no fat absorption was observed in 24 cases. One patient, who did an intensive exercise program three months after the transplantation, developed a hematoma in the reconstructed breast and absorbed 20% fat. Another patient had a small lump palpated in her reconstructed breast, which was removed and a small cyst found with no evidence of malignancy.
Results of MRI image evaluation and patient assessment
The 25 patients treated were examined with MRI imaging annually to evaluate safety. The reconstructed breast after mastectomy showed fat regeneration across the full thickness (Table 1, Figs. 6, 7). The graft retention rate was stable, and no fat necrosis, calcifications, or local cancer recurrence were observed. Naturally shaped reconstructed breasts with soft texture were obtained in all patients. The results of the patient satisfaction survey using the satisfaction visual analog scale (9.24 ± 1.04) one year after surgery are shown in Table 1. In 2023, 3–6 years after surgery, we also evaluated patient satisfaction regarding (1) breast shape (83.3 ± 8.7) (2) breast softness (93.3 ± 6.8) (3) impact on daily activities (88.5 ± 10.5) (4) psychological wellbeing (90.8 ± 10.0) (5) recovery from loss of natural breast (84.2 ± 13.2) (6) general physical wellbeing (85.6 ± 9.4) and (7) surgical results (88.3 ± 11.2).
Discussion
Successful breast reconstruction using only fat after mastectomy requires a high survival rate and long-term graft retention. Although various advantages of fat grafting have been reported in breast reconstruction, resorption of the fat graft remains an important clinical challenge that needs to be resolved10,11,12,13,14,15. In general, healthy adipose tissue survives because it is supported by a rich vascular network that nourishes it. Naturally, if there are few blood vessels, the adipose tissue will be malnourished and absorbed.
Blood vessels in aspirated fat grafts are crushed by liposuction, so there is no blood flow to the site itself. As a result, the grafts are likely to become necrotic and absorbed after transplantation. Therefore, we thought that the addition of a factor (culture medium) that promotes angiogenesis of fat grafts would improve the fat engraftment rate.
Macrophages are also an important component of adipose tissue and play a key role in angiogenesis and adipogenesis26,27,28. It has also been demonstrated that MCP-1 produced in adipose tissue attracts macrophages to the tissue, and MCP-1 has been reported to be important for increasing macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue29,30,31,33,34,35. MCP-1 (CCL2), which is produced in adipose tissue, has been demonstrated to attract macrophages to the tissue in mice lacking the CCR2 receptor and by using drugs that inhibit CCR2 signaling28. Furthermore, it has been reported that MCP-1 directly binds to human vascular endothelial cells expressing the CCR2 receptor to promote angiogenesis31.
We found that the condition medium (CM) secreted by CMAs contained a large amount of MCP-1 (16,000 pg/ml), which attracted and mobilized macrophages in the transplanted fat. This was evidenced by the abundant expression of CD68 in the regenerated fat tissue, demonstrating the presence of macrophages. In addition, since CD31 and CD34 are expressed in the blood vessels in regenerated fat tissue, it can be said that the sequence of fat tissue regeneration, macrophage recruitment, and angiogenesis was induced, which is useful for maintaining the fat formation.
Furthermore, immunostaining of CMAs showed that they contained VEGFR2-positive vascular endothelial progenitor cells and PDGFR-β-positive preadipocytes. PDGFR-β in vascular endothelial cells has been shown to affect angiogenesis36. Blocking VEGF signaling with anti-VEGFR2 antibodies prevent adipogenesis, indicating that VEGFR2-positive cells form the final angiogenic adipose35 and demonstrating that VEGFR-2-positive cells are required for angiogenesis in transplanted adipose tissue. Because CMAM-FGs contain large amounts of MCP-1 and the vascular progenitor cells mentioned above, we concluded that the vascular network is rapidly restored and macrophages are subsequently mobilized, promoting adipogenesis and resulting in long-term adipose tissue survival.
CMAs secrete the most MCP-1, followed by IL8, IL-6 and VEGF, which are known to be involved in angiogenesis37,38,39,40,41. The highest secretion of MCP-1 by our CMAs, which is involved in adipogenesis, may be useful for adipogenesis after the transplantation. CMAs also secrete GRO. GRO is present in normal breast adipose tissue42, it is reported to be increased in serum level of obese women and it is associated with adiposity43.
In addition, CMAs express very little TNF-α, IL-1β, and INF-γ. Therefore, the mature adipocyte-containing composition obtained by the above method, our CMAM-FGs, have a low potential for causing inflammation and is suitable for adipose tissue maintenance after the transplantation.
Next, we compared ASCs cultured from the SVF fraction without adipocytes with our CMAs, noting that Zwierzina et al. classified SVF cells in human white adipose tissue into three types, all of which also express the mesenchymal stem cell marker CD90 at higher levels as a common feature44. Our results show that CMAs cells express approximately tenfold higher levels of CD90 than SVF cells. Although it is possible that SVF could not be completely eliminated from CMAs because they were not enzyme-treated, it is likely that the cells were less damaged; the mixture of adipocytes and SVF may have enhanced their expression compared with SVF-only cells. We also believe that this is because SVF-only eliminates the influence of adipocytes. All of the above indicates that CMA is a distinct cell population from SVF. In addition, CMAs were clearly shown by immunostaining to contain a mixture of both adipose progenitor cells and vascular endothelial progenitor cells, and this mixture may have contributed to the high rate of adipose tissue engraftment and maintenance after transplantation.
It should also be noted that an important factor contributing to the high post-transplantation engraftment rate is the high amount of angiogenic factors secreted by the CMAs, a group of factors that promote adipose tissue retention. Among these, MCP-1 (CCL2), which is released in the largest amount, is essential for complete adipose tissue remodeling because it induces not only angiogenesis but also macrophages necessary for adipose tissue.
We believe that our CMAs cells have achieved long-term survival of transplanted adipose tissue, which is different from conventional adipogenesis, due to the above-mentioned factors.
Cellular senescence studies conducted on six of the 25 patients also showed that the CMAs could be cultured until they stopped growing due to cell aging (PDL: 36.8–84.2, 55.84 ± 17.63, 61–102 days: 75.67 ± 18.00) and had no capacity for sustained cell proliferation or transformation. In addition, the biopsy specimens of all patients after transplantation were negative in testing for Ki67, a cell proliferation marker, suggesting that CMAs is safe.
In a meta-analysis of 21 studies, the estimated number of transplants required to complete whole breast reconstruction was inconsistent, ranging from 2 to 7 sessions11,15. In a recent report of 22 cases of total breast reconstruction with fat grafting, 11 cases (50%) abandoned the use of fat only reconstruction and converted to breast implants due to inadequate engraftment45. This indicates that engraftment of fat grafts has conventionally been unreliable in whole breast reconstruction until now.
We achieved 100% fat-only whole breast reconstruction with only two transplants for unilateral cases and only three transplants for bilateral cases. This indicates that our grafting method is more stable compared to other fat grafting methods.
Most importantly, the mean engraftment rate was 99.16 ± 4.00%, and graft retention was maintained after 2–6 years, demonstrating greater reliability and sustainability compared to previous fat grafting techniques.
The reconstructed breast, which is made of fatty tissue as in a healthy breast, has a soft and natural aesthetic appearance, leading to high general patient satisfaction (patient satisfaction VAS: 9.24 ± 1.04) 1 year after surgery. Three to six years after surgery a new patient survey was conducted evaluating satisfaction in terms of breast shape, and softness, patients expressed that breast reconstruction had had a positive impact on their daily activities, as well as psychological and general physical wellbeing. Patients were satisfied with the surgical results and indicated the surgery had helped them recover from the loss of their natural breasts. All seven categories of patient satisfaction stayed above 80% after 3–6 years (Fig. 8). The follow-up periods, to date, are 2–6 years with no complications or recurrence of breast cancer. It is also important in terms of patient safety that the cell proliferation marker Ki67, an important molecular target for cancer diagnosis, was negative in all patient biopsy specimens after transplantation. We plan to continue biopsy testing with patient consent. Further studies with annual MRI examinations are needed to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of this procedure.
Materials and methods
Patients
This is a retrospective cohort study conducted between December 2015 and December 2022, in which 25 patients with breast cancer who had undergone total mastectomy underwent successful fat-only total breast reconstruction using cultured mature adipocytes and conditioned medium containing MCP-1. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yanaga Clinic on February, 22, 2015. And then, the study was conducted in accordance with all relevant and applicable governmental and institutional guidelines and regulations, as well as cell therapy guidelines set out by Japanese regenerative medicine law since December, 2015. Yanaga Clinic and Tissue Culture Laboratory, is certified as a Class 2 Regenerative Medicine Cell Processing Facility (registration number: FC7140009; 23 March, 2015) and a Class 2 Regenerative Medicine Provider (registration number for autologous cultured adipocytes transplantation: PB7150005, 11 November, 2015). Clinical outcomes, efficacy, and patient safety were reported as required annually to a government-certified committee on Regenerative Medicine (Gamagori City Hospital Deliberation Committee for Specific Regenerative Medicine as an external committee), the Kyushu office of the Ministry of Health regenerative medicine committee, and finally the Japanese Ministry of Health committee on regenerative medicine. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study protocol conformed to the ethical principles in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the respective institutional review boards.
Preparation of human mature adipocyte culture and condition medium
Approximately 3 cc of fat was harvested from the patient’s lower abdomen by subcutaneous aspiration, washed, sterilized with antibiotics, digested with collagenase, finely filtered with cell strainer, and centrifuged to collect only the fat component floating in the supernatant. Blood components containing ASCs + SVF precipitated as a pellet in the lower layer were discarded. The microfat particles (Fig. 1A) were cultured in a medium consisting of 10% autologous serum added to α-MEM medium.
From 2.8 ± 0.9 ml of aspirated fat collected, 6.92 × 105 ± 3.25 x 105 adipocytes were isolated. The number of cells obtained at P0 passaging was 10.1 × 106 ± 2.8 × 106, of which 1 × 106 was seeded into one 175 cm2 flask and the remaining cells were frozen and stored. The number of cells obtained from P1 passaging was 11.6 × 106 ± 6.2 × 106. Of these, 5 × 105 were seeded per 150 cm2 flask. The remaining cells were cryopreserved. The final number of cells seeded in the 150 cm2 flasks for transplantation was 4.9 × 106 ± 1.6 × 106. (Fig. 1B).The cell count at final transplantation was 17.00 × 107 ± 3.09 × 107. The process from the cell harvest to transplantation was 122.2 ± 100.18 days. In the final phase, after the cryopreserved cells are thawed, they are cultured and transplanted in a period of 13.3 ± 1.2 days.
The fat droplets of cultured cells were stained with Sudan III (Fig. 1C). All cells collected from patients were labeled and will be stored at the cell processing facility at 1.0 × 106 cells/tube for 10 years.
Ability of angiogenesis and adipogenesis in CMAs in vitro
One group of CMAs alone and one group of CMAs plus aspirated fat graft were prepared (n = 6) and cultured for five days to determine whether the CMAs contained PDGFRβ (+) preadipocyte cells and VEGFR2 (+) endothelial progenitor cells. Cells in the wells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. The reagents used were anti-VEGFR2 polyclonal antibody (Bioss, 1: 100) as the primary antibody, anti-PDGFRβ polyclonal antibody [Y92]-C-terminal (Abcam, 1:100), goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (HRP) (Abcam, 1:200) as the secondary antibody, and DAB substrate kit (Funakoshi, SK-4100, [Vector Laboratories, Inc.]) (Fig. 1D).
Cell surface marker characterization of CMAs
Flow cytometry (Guava easyCyteHT System, easyCyte5HT, S/N: 8470050255, Luminex Corporation) was performed to characterize the cell surface marker profile of human CMA.
Mature adipocytes (n = 6) and SVF cells (n = 6) were isolated and cultured from the same tissue of six individuals. To eliminate individual differences, the mature adipocytes from the six individuals were mixed and cultured in group A and the SVF cells from the same six individuals were cultured in group B. Cells from both groups were detached with trypsin solution and collected. Cells were aliquoted into tubes to make 1 × 106 cells. The cells were immunoassayed with 5 μg antibodies for 30 min at 4 °C listed below, and 10,000 cells were measured in a flow cytometer. Using the measurement results, the expression of MSC markers CD166, CD29, CD105, CD73, CD44, CD90 in both groups were analyzed (Fig. 2).
To calculate CD166, CD29, CD105, CD73, CD44 and CD90 percentage in CMAs and SVFs cells respectively, the analysis was performed as follows (Fig. 2): in total, 10,000 events were recorded by flow cytometry (Guava easyCyte5HT, Luminex Corporation) and the resultant data were analyzed by Guava InCyte software (Luminex Corporation). Events were gated according to their FSC/SSC profile (gate R1) to exclude cellular debris. Expression profiles of CD166, CD29, CD105, CD73, CD44 and CD90 were evaluated with respect to isotype control (gate R2).
The following antibodies were used: PE anti-human CD166 antibody (Biolegend, 343,903), PE anti-human CD29 antibody (Biolegend, 303,003), PE anti-human CD105 antibody (Biolegend, 323,205) PE anti-human CD73 (Ecto-5'-nucleotidase) antibody (Biolegend, 344,003), PE anti-human CD44 antibody (Biolegend, 338,807), PE anti-human CD90 (Thy1) antibody (Biolegend, 328,109), PE mouse IgG1, κ isotype control antibody (Biolegend, 400,111), and human BD Fc block, (BD, 564,220).
Cytokine/chemokine bead assay in vitro
For condition medium (CM) analysis, cells were washed three times with PBS (−), cultured in serum-free α-MEM medium for two days, and used for analysis. Cytokine/chemokine analysis of CM (n = 6) was performed using antibody immobilization on magnetic beads. The CM sample was centrifuged at 13,000g and 4 °C for 5 min, and the resulting supernatant was used for measurement. Concentrations of 40 target proteins in CM were measured using a Milliplex® MAP Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel kit and Luminex® technology (Merck Millipore). Procedures were performed according to the manual (HCYTOMAG-60K.pdf). Pretreated sample was added at 25 μl per well, and measurements were taken three times. Standard solution was prepared as stated in the manual, seven concentrations were prepared in a fivefold serial dilution series, and three measurements (replicates per analysis) were performed. The 41 target proteins were EGF, FGF-2, Eotaxin, TGF-α, G-CSF, Flt-3L, fractalkine, IFNα2, IFNγ, IL-10, GRO,MCP-3, IL-12P40, MDC, IL-12P70, PDGF-AA, IL-13, PDGF-AB / BB, IL-15, sCD40L, IL-17A, IL-1RA, IL-1α, IL-9, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, RANTES, TNFα, TNFβ, and VEGF (Fig. 3).
CMAs cell aging study in vitro
Cellular senescence studies on mature adipocytes were conducted to confirm the safety of the CMAs prepared for patients. A characteristic of tumorigenic cells is proliferation without stopping. This test is therefore conducted when the cells are cultured to confirm that cells stop growing. CMAs were cultured until growth arrest was noted for six of the 25 patients. The population doubling level (PDL) was also measured (Fig. 4).
Clinical application of the CMAs + condition medium and fat graft (CMAM-FGs) in-vivo
A breast-shaped tissue expander was inserted under the pectoralis major muscle and subcutaneously on the affected breast, marked at the location of the healthy breast, and the regular saline solution was injected through the port of the tissue expander, gradually expanding the breast to a size similar to the healthy breast over 6 months. The volume of the healthy breast was defined preoperatively as the breast volume to be achieved during the reconstruction. In the first transplant procedure, half of the saline solution was drawn out from the tissue expander and CMAM-FG was injected around the outside of the capsule of the expander using a cannula with a diameter of 1.2–2.5 mm. In the second procedure, after removal of the expander, the capsule (fibrous tissue) was also removed. The removal of the capsule allows for more blood circulation and improves CMAM-FG engraftment. CMAM-FG was then injected subcutaneously and into the internal cavity created after removal of the expander. The ratio of CMA to autologous fat was determined based on the results of transplantation experiments on nude mice and subsequent partial breast defects and augmentation procedures, which showed ideal engraftment rates at a volume ratio of 1:100. The amount of CMAs for unilateral transplants ranged from 25.74 × 107 to 38.61 × 107 (33.07 × 107 ± 4.29 × 107), and the amount of CMAs for bilateral transplants ranged from 60.06 × 107 to 64.35 × 107 (62.21 × 107 ± 3.03 × 107). Total unilateral injection volumes were 355 to 870 cc (564.52 ± 118.92). Total bilateral injection volumes were 870 to 1336 cc (avg 1103.00 ± 329.51). CM accounted for 20% of the total fat content. Patients with unilateral cases underwent two transplants, and those with bilateral cases underwent three transplants (Table1; Fig. S1). The patient’s BMI was measured pre and post operation and no significant changes were noted. Pre-Op BMI was 22.8 ± 2.5 and Post-Op BMI was 22.4 ± 2.2. No significant difference (P = 0.12) was found. It is also to be noted that the average obtained was similar to the average BMI of Japanese women (40–69 years old) of 22.6 as reported in 2016 the National Health and Nutrition Survey by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan48.
Immunofluorescence or immunohistochemical analysis of regenerated fat after CMAM-FGs engraftment in-vivo
Biopsies of reconstructed fat six months to one year after transplantation were analyzed histologically. Tissue samples were fixed at 4 °C in 4% PFA, processed, and embedded in paraffin. Transverse sections (4 μm) were placed on MAS-coated slides (Matsunami Glass Ind. Ltd.) for either immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry.
1. Expression of perilipin as lipid droplet-associated protein.
Anti-perilipin (guinea pig) (Fitzgerald Industries International, 20R-PP004, MA, USA) (4 °C/1 h, 1:200) was used as the perilipin primary antibody, and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-guinea pig IgG (InvitrogenA11073, CA, USA) (room temperature/1 h) was used as the secondary antibody. Encapsulation was achieved using Invitrogen™, SlowFade™, Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) for nuclear staining. Images were examined using a Zeiss LSM510 laser scanning microscope (Fig. 5A).
2. Detection and characterization of macrophages (CD68), angiogenesis (cell surface marker of differentiation: CD31, CD34), and cell proliferation marker (Ki67)46.
Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies used were rabbit monoclonal anti-human CD31 (1:200, Abcam: ab76533), mouse monoclonal CD34 anti-human (1:200, Cell Signal, TEC 3569S), mouse monoclonal CD68 anti-human macrophage (1:500, Abcam, ab955), and rabbit monoclonal anti-human Ki 67(30-9) (Roche, 518102456). After treatment with biotin-labeled secondary antibody (LSAB2, DAKO K0609) at room temperature for 30 min, the sections were stained using DAB (Fig. 5B–E).
MRI evaluation
MRI images were used to confirm the engraftment of cultured fat. T1 and T2-weighed images were taken in the axial and sagittal sections. Diffusion-weighted images were also taken for the axial section. T2-Fat-Saturation-weighted images were taken in the coronal section.
All patients underwent MRI examinations annually after transplantation, and the images were evaluated by one breast surgeon and two radiologists at other facilities. These evaluations indicated full-layer fat formation for all the patients.
Statistical analysis
Data are shown as the mean ± SEM from at least six independent experiments. For cytokine/chemokine analysis, the concentration of the target protein (X) was calculated from the calibration curve using Master Plex® QT analytical software (Hitachi Solutions) and the five-parameter logistic function. Functional motion field imaging was used to show median fluorescence intensity.
Statistical analysis using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test was performed to compare the differences between MCP-1 and other cytokines or chemokines after checking for normality of these data with a Shapiro–Wilk test. Statistical significance was considered as p < 0.01 (two-tailed), and all values are expressed as mean ±SD. Statistical software SPSS Statistics 26 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for these analyses.
Patient satisfaction scales
The VAS of patient satisfaction is a horizontal line 10 cm long. At the beginning and end are two descriptors representing the minimum and maximum limits of satisfaction (i.e., no satisfaction and total satisfaction)47. The patients mark their level of satisfaction on the 10 cm line. For reference there are also five levels of human facial expressions on top of the line.
In the satisfaction survey conducted in September 2023 among patients who had undergone surgery 3–6 years earlier. The scale used was 0–100, 100 expressing the highest level of satisfaction.
Informed consent
All patients were explained the purpose and scope of this study and they all provided written informed consent to participate in it.
Data availability
All data mentioned in this study is included in this manuscript.
References
Heer, E. et al. Global burden and trends in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer: A population-based study. Lancet Glob Health. 8, e1027–e1037 (2020).
Fahad Ullah, M. Breast Cancer: Current perspectives on the disease status. Review. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1152, 51–64 (2019).
Ter Louw, R. P. & Nahabedian, M. Y. Prepectoral breast reconstruction. Review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction), 51S–59S (2017).
Jeong, W., Lee, S. & Kim, J. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Review. Breast. 38, 45–51 (2018).
Colwell, A. S. & Taylor, E. M. Recent advances in implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 145, 421e–432e (2020).
Lemaine, V. et al. Autologous breast reconstruction versus implant-based reconstruction: How do long-term costs and health care use compare?. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 145, 303–311 (2020).
Wagner, R. D., Braun. T. L., Zhu. H. & Winocour, S. A systematic review of complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 72, 1051–1059 (2019).
Groth, A. K. & Graf, R. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and the textured breast implant crisis. Rev. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 44, 1–12 (2020).
Clemens, M. W., Jacobsen, E. D. & Horwitz, S. M. 2019 NCCN consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). Aesth. Surg. J. 39(Suppl_1), S3–S13 (2019).
Gutowski, K. A.; ASPS Fat Graft Task Force. Current applications and safety of autologous fat grafts: A report of the ASPS fat graft task force. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 124, 272–280 (2009).
Delay, E., Meruta, A. C. & Guerid, S. Indications and controversies in total breast reconstruction with lipomodeling. Rev. Clin. Plast. Surg. 45, 111–117 (2018).
Parrish, J. N. & Metzinger, S. E. Autogenous fat grafting and breast augmentation: A review of the literature. Aesth. Surg. J. 30, 549–556 (2010).
Coleman, S. R. Long-term survival of fat transplants: Controlled demonstrations. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 19, 421–425 (1995).
Ersek, R. A. Transplantation of purified autologous fat: a 3-year follow-up is disappointing. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 87, 219–227 (1991).
Khouri, R. K. et al. Brava and autologous fat transfer is a safe and effective breast augmentation alternative: Results of a 6-year, 81-patient, prospective multicenter study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 129, 1173–1187 (2012).
Groen, J. W. et al. Autologous fat grafting in onco-plastic breast reconstruction: A systematic review on oncological and radiological safety, complications, volume retention and patient/surgeon satisfaction. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 69, 742–764 (2016).
Howes, B. H. L., Watson, D. I., Fosh, B. & Dean, N. R. Efficacy of an external volume expansion device and autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction following breast conserving surgery and total mastectomy: Small improvements in quality of life found in a prospective cohort study. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesth. Surg. 73, 27–35 (2020).
Cason, R. G. et al. The influence of fat grafting on breast imaging after postmastectomy reconstruction: A matched cohort analysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 146, 1227–1236 (2020).
Herly, M. et al. Efficacy of breast reconstruction with fat grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesth. Surg. 71, 1740–1750 (2018).
Eto, H. et al. The fate of adipocytes after nonvascularized fat grafting: Evidence of early death and replacement of adipocytes. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 129, 1081–1092 (2012).
Yoshimura, K., Eto, H., Kato, H., Doi, K. & Aoi, N. In vivo manipulation of stem cells for adipose tissue repair/reconstruction. Regen Med. 6(6 Suppl), 33–41 (2011).
Toyserkani, N. M., Quaade, M. L. & Sørensen, J. A. Cell-assisted lipotransfer: A systematic review of its efficacy. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 40, 309–318 (2016).
Zhou, Y. et al. Efficacy and safety of cell-assisted lipotransfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr. Surg. 137, 44e–57e (2016).
Arshad, Z. et al. Cell assisted lipotransfer in breast augmentation and reconstruction: A systematic review of safety, efficacy, use of patient reported outcomes and study quality. JPRAS Open. 10, 5–20 (2016).
Li, M. & Chen, C. The efficacy of cell-assisted lipotransfer versus conventional lipotransfer in breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 45, 1478–1486 (2021).
Cai, J., Feng, J., Lui, K., Zhou, S. & Lu, F. Early macrophage infiltration improves fat graft survival by inducing angiogenesis and hematopoietic stem cell recruitment. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 141, 376–386 (2018).
Debels, H. et al. Macrophages play a key role in angiogenesis and adipogenesis in a mouse tissue engineering model. Tissue Eng. Part A. 19, 2615–2625 (2013).
Xu, F. et al. Angiogenic deficiency and adipose tissue dysfunction are associated with macrophage malfunction in SIRT1-/- mice. Endocrinology. 153, 1706–1716 (2012).
Lilja, H. E. et al. An adipoinductive role of inflammation in adipose tissue engineering: key factors in the early development of engineered soft tissue. Stem Cells Dev. 22, 1602–1613 (2013).
Niu, J., Azfer, A., Zhelyabovska, O., Fatma, S. & Kolattukudy, P. E. Monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 promotes angiogenesis via a novel transcription factor, MCP-1-induced protein (MCPIP). J. Biol. Chem. 283, 14542–14551 (2008).
Ito, A. et al. Role of CC chemokine receptor 2 in bone marrow cells in the recruitment of macrophages into obese adipose tissue. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 35715–35723 (2008).
Ahmadian, M. et al. PPARγ signaling and metabolism: the good, the bad and future. Nat. Med. 19, 557–566 (2013).
Kanda, H. et al. MCP-1 contributes to macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis in obesity. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 1494–1505 (2006).
Lai, N., Jayaraman, A. & Lee, K. Enhanced proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and differentiation of 3T3-L1 adipocytes in coculture. Tissue Eng. Part A. 15, 1053–1061 (2009).
Fukumura, D. et al. Paracrine regulation of angiogenesis and adipocyte differentiation during in vivo adipogenesis. Circ. Res. 93, e88–e97 (2003).
Periasamy, R., Elshaer, S. L. & Gangaraju, R. CD140b (PDGFRβ) signaling in adipose-derived stem cells mediates angiogenic behavior of retinal endothelial cells. Regen. Eng. Transl. Med. 5, 1–9 (2019).
Li, A., Seema, D., Varney, M. L., Dave, B. J. & Singh, R. K. IL-8 directly enhanced endothelial cell survival, proliferation, and matrix metalloproteinases production and regulated angiogenesis. J. Immunol. 170, 3369–3376 (2003).
Li, A. et al. Autocrine role of interleukin-8 in induction of endothelial cell proliferation, survival, migration and MMP-2 production and angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 8, 63–71 (2005).
Hou, Y. et al. IL-8 enhances the angiogenic potential of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by increasing vascular endothelial growth factor. Cell Biol. Int. 38, 1050–1059 (2014).
Bechara, C., Chai, H., Lin, P. H., Yao, Q. & Chen, C. Growth related oncogene-alpha (GRO-alpha): Roles in atherosclerosis, angiogenesis and other inflammatory conditions. Med. Sci. Monit. 13, RA87–90 (2007).
Ma, H. et al. Conditioned medium from primary cytotrophoblasts, primary placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells, or sub-cultured placental tissue promoted HUVEC angiogenesis in vitro. Stem Cell Res Ther. 12, 141 (2021).
Fletcher, S. J. et al. Comparative proteomics of soluble factors secreted by human breast adipose tissue from tumor and normal breast. Oncotarget 9, 31007–31017 (2018).
Maury, E. et al. Effect of obesity on growth-related oncogene factor-α, thrombopoietin, and tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase-1 serum levels. Obesity 18, 1503–1509 (2010).
Zwierzina, M. E. et al. Characterization of DLK1(PREF1)+/CD34+ cells in vascular stroma of human white adipose tissue. Stem Cell Res. 15, 403–418 (2015).
Kolasinski, J. & Pyka, P. Fat grafting following internal tissue expansion: An option for breast reconstruction after total mastectomy. Plast Reconstr. Surg. Glob Open. 10, e4088 (2022).
Li, L. T., Jiang, G., Chen, Q. & Zheng, J. N. Ki67 is a promising molecular target in the diagnosis of cancer (review) Mol. Med. Rep. 11, 1566–1572 (2015).
Brokeman, R. B. G. et al. The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. Eur. Orthop. Traumatol. 3, 101–105 (2012).
Results of the 2016 National Health and Nutrition Survey by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou/h28-houkoku.html). published 2021.
Yanaga, H. Nipple-areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap: Technical improvement from rolled auricular cartilage to artificial bone. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 112, 1863–1869 (2003).
Yanaga, H. & Yanaga, K. Nipple-areola complex reconstruction with dermal-fat flaps: technical improvement from rolled auricular cartilage to artificial bone. In: Shiffman MA, ed. Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction: Principles and Clinical Techniques 393–402 (Springer, 2018).
Acknowledgements
We thank the participants in our clinical study. We also thank the members of the Certified Committee for Regenerative Medicine for their opinions, evaluation, and certification. This study received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.Y. contributed to the study design, performed all experiments, clinical application, performed data extraction and analysis, and prepared the manuscript. M.K. assisted with the cell culture, histologic analysis and the data extraction and data analysis. Y.T. contributed to animal experiments in the preliminary stages of this study and revised the manuscript. H.N. analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. K.Y. contributed to the conception, clinical application and supervision. All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yanaga, H., Koga, M., Nishina, H. et al. Successful fat-only whole breast reconstruction using cultured mature adipocytes and conditioned medium containing MCP-1. Sci Rep 13, 18998 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45169-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45169-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.