Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer diagnosed among women in the world1. Cancer mortality has declined due to early detection and therapeutic advances in recent decades2. More survivors after completing oncotherapy face the establishment of a family due to increased cancer survival and delayed childbearing3. It is worth noting that cancer treatments, including pelvic radiation, after chemotherapy and surgery can cause iatrogenic damage to the reproductive system, and so, pose a threat to female fertility4. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that oncologists discuss fertility preservation options with their patients as early as possible before treatment starts5.

Studies show that BC patients have significantly lower serum levels of 25-OH vitamin D than healthy subjects. Low serum 25-OH vitamin D levels are associated with aggressive breast cancer phenotypes6. So that an inverse relationship was found between the serum level of 25(OH) D and the risk of breast cancer. Also, a statistical difference was observed between different vitamin D receptors (VDRs) genotypes and circulating levels of 25(OH)D among women with breast cancer7.

Vitamin D is a steroid molecule that regulates the expression of a large number of genes by interacting with vitamin D receptors (VDRs)8. VDRs are found in most tissues and cells in the body. The main role of vitamin D is to regulate bone metabolism and homeostasis of calcium and phosphorus9. Recent evidence suggests that vitamin D can also have non-skeletal actions, including an important role in cancers10. Vitamin D has multiple anticarcinogenic roles in BC that are well-described at the molecular level11.

The interaction between vitamin D and reproduction is based on the presence of both VDR and 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) in various tissues of the reproductive system in both sexes. So that presence of VDRs and 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) in various tissues of the male and female reproductive organs indicates the role of vitamin D in the function of the reproductive system. CYPR1 in reproductive organ is involved in vitamin D activation, as its expression progressively decreases in association with the reproductive organ damage12. VDRs are present in the glandular epithelial cells of endometrium, fallopian epithelial cells, granulosa cells and cumulus oophorus cells of the ovary8,12. Vitamin D levels of follicular fluid (FF), which serves as the biochemical microenvironment of the oocyte before ovulation, correlate with the quality of the oocyte and oocyte competence13.

The studies show that with presence of VDR in female reproductive tissue, vitamin D is an important role in female reproduction. So that vitamin D deficiency may change AMH expression and its serum level14. On the other hand, vitamin D plays a role in inducing apoptosis, stimulating cell differentiation, anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects, and inhibiting angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis in cancer15. Therefore, vitamin D deficiency in women with breast cancer can affect their fertility and the quality of their ovaries16.

Considering the anticarcinogenic roles of vitamin D in BC and its role in the function of the female reproductive system and taking into account that in various physiological and pathological conditions, the metabolism and signaling of vitamin D are different17, the present study was conducted to evaluate the possible relationship between vitamin D levels with oocyte quality in BC women comparing to the control group.

Results

The characteristics of both groups of women are given in Table 1. As shown, there are no significant differences in demographic information, fertility, hormone profile, ovarian stimulation drugs, physical activity and sun exposure between the groups (P > 0.05).

Table 1 Comparison of the participants’ characteristics between the breast cancer and control groups.

As displayed in Table 2, the mean levels of serum and FF 25(OH) D in the BC group are significantly lower than in the control group (22.26 ± 7.98 vs. 29.61 ± 9.12 and 21.65 ± 7.59 vs. 28.00 ± 9.05, P > 0.05, respectively). The Pearson's correlation analysis results, showed a significant correlation between the levels of 25(OH) D in serum and FF in BC women (correlation coefficient r = 0.873, P < 0.001) and Control group (correlation coefficient r = 0.886, P < 0.001).

Table 2 Comparison of serum and FF 25(OH) D levels and oocyte parameters between the two groups.

There was no significant difference in terms of the number of follicles > 16 mm, number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes and oocyte maturity between the two groups. Although the number of morph and slightly dysmorph oocytes in the BC group was significantly less than in the control group, the number of dysmorph and highly dysmorph oocytes in these women was statistically higher than in their control counterparts (P < 0.001) (Table 2).

In the assessment of correlation between variables (Table 3), in BC women, as in the control group, no significant correlation was observed between the serum and FF 25(OH)D levels with the number of follicles > 16 mm, number of oocytes retrieved, number of MII oocytes, oocyte maturity and morphology of MII oocytes (P > 0.05).

Table 3 Correlation of serum and FF 25(OH) D levels with oocyte parameters in the two groups.

Moreover, there were statistically significant differences in the mean level of serum 25(OH)D between the morph, slightly dysmorph, dysmorph and highly dysmorph oocytes in both groups (P < 0.001). In the BC women, Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons showed that the mean level of serum 25(OH) D in the highly dysmorph oocytes was significantly lower than in the morph oocytes (13.87 ± 0.00 vs. 21.10 ± 0.00, P = 0.01), slightly dysmorph oocytes (13.87 ± 0.00 vs. 24.46 ± 6.60, P < 0.001) and dysmorph oocytes (13.87 ± 0.00 vs. 25.24 ± 9.06, P < 0.001). Also the mean level of serum 25(OH) D in the dysmorph oocytes was significantly higher than slightly dysmorph oocytes (25.24 ± 9.06 vs. 24.46 ± 6.60, P = 0.02). In the control group, the mean level of serum 25(OH) D in the morph oocytes was significantly less than in the dysmorph oocytes (25.38 ± 4.15 vs. 30.12 ± 3.47, P = 0.03) (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of the morphology of MII oocytes in terms of serum Vitamin D level in the two groups.

Discussion

Past evidence suggests that vitamin D has a potential role in ovarian follicular development and function from primordial follicle activation to ovulation, and ultimately generating mature and competent oocytes for fertilization13,17. In clinical studies, the relationship between vitamin D levels in the circulation and the follicle or oocyte parameters may be significantly different among patients due to various physiological and pathological conditions17. The present research results revealed no correlation between the serum and FF 25(OH)D levels with the number of oocytes retrieved, follicles > 16 mm, and MII Oocytes, as well as oocyte maturity and morphology of MII oocytes in both of the study groups.

The results of our study showed that in BC women, as in the control group, the serum and FF 25(OH)D levels were correlated, and this indicates that peripheral vitamin D status is a reliable indicator of intraovarian 25(OH)D. Dehghani Firouzabadi et al. found a significant correlation between the serum and FF 25(OH) D levels (r = 0.83; P = 0.001)18. Also Ozkan et al. reported a correlation between the serum and FF 25(OH) D levels (r = 0.94, P < 0.001), demonstrating that FF 25(OH) D levels are actually a reliable reflection of vitamin D reserves in the body19. Aleyasin et al.20 and Ciepiela et al.13 reported similar results.

In this study, the mean level of serum 25(OH) D in the BC women referring to the Royan Institute for fertility preservation was significantly lower than in the control group. According to Voutsadakis’s study, there is an association between vitamin D deficiency and BC at diagnosis and may be linked pathophysiologically with BC development or progression11. De La Puente-Yagüe et al. summarized the mechanisms of action of vitamin D in BC as follows: (a) decreases cell proliferation and increases cell maturation and apoptosis, (b) suppresses inflammation and reduces the accumulation of inflammatory cells, (c) inhibits angiogenesis and regulates insulin secretion and action15. In the present study, according to the correlation between serum and FF 25(OH) D levels, the mean level of FF 25(OH) D was lower in the BC group comparing to the control group; this difference can affect oocyte competence13. However, the existence and importance of vitamin D metabolism and signaling pathway during folliculogenesis and oogenesis, and the mechanisms of vitamin D effect on oocyte competence remain unclear.

The results of Castiglione Morelli et al.'s study showed that FF has a different metabolic composition in cancer patients as compared to healthy controls21. Glucose is an essential metabolite for the Cumulus Oocyte Complex (COC), which provides substrates for energy production to the oocyte22. The effect of altering levels of glucose metabolism is probably one of the main reasons for diminished oocyte competence and reduced fertility23. Anifandis et al. showed a significant negative correlation between FF vitamin D levels with FF glucose levels, probably through affecting insulin action, which resulted in modulation of FF glucose metabolism23,24. On the other hand too high or too low glucose concentrations are detrimental to oocyte maturation, granulosa growth and cumulus cells, which can directly affect oocyte competence24. Evidence show that vitamin D have a regulatory role in ovulatory dysfunction, insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism. Evidence has shown that calcitriol increases insulin receptor expression, insulin synthesis and secretion, insulin sensitivity, and reduces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Abnormal fluctuations in intracellular calcium levels in insulin target organs may contribute to peripheral insulin resistance, through impaired insulin signal transduction and glucose transporter function7. Therefore, it is possible that in women with BC, altered levels of FF 25(OH) D affect FF glucose levels, and thereby, oocyte competence.

The findings of Polyzos et al. indicated that there was no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved and the number of MII oocytes among the infertile women with serum vitamin D levels less than 20 ng/ml and more than 20 ng/ml25. Also, Ciepiela et al. reported that there was a significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of MII, MI oocytes, estradiol, and progesterone on the day of hCG between infertile women with serum 25(OH) D levels less than 20 ng/ml and more than 20 ng/ml13. According to Farzadi et al.'s study, no significant correlation was observed between FF 25(OH) D levels with the number of oocytes, the number of fertilized oocytes, duration of infertility, and estradiol levels26. Our findings showed that in the BC women, as in the control group, there was no correlation between serum and FF 25(OH) D levels with the number of follicles > 16 mm, the number of oocytes retrieved and oocyte maturity. In contrast, Castiglione Morelli et al. reported a different trend of the correlations between the total number of follicles and oocytes quality with some metabolites in BC patients21. This difference is because cancer leads to disturbances in the metabolism of amino acids, lipids, organic acids, and the serum level of 25(OH) D and glucose in the follicular fluid, which affects the egg and its quality. According to the mentioned results, a certain threshold of the amount of vitamin D affects fertility outcomes. So, it seems that more studies are needed in this field. Also, the sample size of the current study was small, and the study researchers recommend that studies with a larger volume be conducted.

In the present study, the relationship between serum and follicular fluid 25(OH) D levels with the quality of oocytes in terms of morphology was investigated in BC women compared to the control group. The results showed that there is no correlation between the serum and FF 25(OH) D levels of women with BC, as in the control group, with the number of morph, slightly dysmorph, dysmorph and highly dysmorph oocytes. Also the mean of serum 25(OH) D levels in the morphology categories of oocytes was investigated separately in each group. Although in the BC women, the mean serum 25(OH) D level in highly dysmorph oocytes was significantly lower than in the other three categories of oocytes, but it should be considered that these oocytes belonged only to one BC woman. The mean serum 25(OH) D level in the slightly dysmorph group was significantly lower than in the dysmorph group (P < 0.05). In the control group, the mean serum 25(OH) D level in the morph group was significantly lower than in the dysmorph group (P < 0.05), and the mean serum 25(OH) D level in the dysmorph and highly dysmorph groups was at the replete level (30.12 ± 3.47 and 35.20 ± 0.00, respectively). Therefore, it cannot be concluded that increasing the serum level of 25(OH) D improves the morphology of oocytes. In the study of Farzadi et al., there was no significant correlation between FF 25(OH) D level and oocytes quality based on morphological criteria in infertile women26. But results in the study of Han Jy et al. showed that vitamin D FF levels were significantly higher in women with decreased ovarian reserve. The promoter region of the AMH gene is very similar to vitamin D response elements, and it has been suggested that vitamin D concentration may be related to AMH expression27. In the present study, there was no correlation between serum and FF 25(OH) D levels with the morphology of MII oocytes (Table 3). So, serum and FF 25(OH) D levels probably cannot be suitable indicators for examining the morphology of oocytes in BC women. These contradictory findings may be because the optimal level of vitamin D FF in accordance with ovarian reserve, are not considered. Therefore, it is necessary to determine an optimal threshold for vitamin D levels in follicles.

A study by Zaire et al. showed that vitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 can act as substrates for VD3 production and autocrine role in the regulation of follicle development. As a result, further research using follicular culture on protein production and cellular function of vitamin D biosynthetic protein, in addition to signaling pathways and autocrine function of vitamin D is needed28.

Our findings indicated that the quality of oocytes based on morphological criteria in women with BC was significantly different from the control group. In BC women, the number of dysmorph and highly dysmorph oocytes was higher and the number of morph and slightly dysmorph oocytes was lower than in the control group. This can be caused by other factors that affect the morphology of oocytes in BC women. For example, Bercaire LMN et al. reported that letrozole is a risk factor for worse oocyte morphology29. Also, the study of Hossein Rashidi et al. showed that in the letrozole group estradiol level was significantly lower and testosterone significantly higher than in the control group. The number of retrieved oocytes, MII oocytes, and high grade oocyte numberwas significantly lower in the letrozole group (p < 0.05)30.

This study had several limitations, including measuring 25(OH) D level only from the lead follicles, small sample size, and not measuring Vitamin D Binding Globulin (VDBP) levels. This is a cross-sectional exploratory study and the sample size is small for some factors. The strength of this research was that, for the first time, the level of FF 25(OH) D was investigated in the BC women referring for fertility preservation.

Conclusion

The research results showed that BC women referring to infertility centers for fertility preservation are more likely to be deficient in serum 25(OH) D; this subsequently affects the FF 25(OH) D level. Therefore, these people need more attention due to the time limit to start their cancer treatment. However, serum and FF 25(OH) D levels may not be suitable indicators for examining the maturity and quality of oocytes in terms of morphology in women with BC, and the poor morphological quality of oocytes in BC women may be due to other causes, which needs further investigations to find clear-cut answers in this regard.

Methods

This cross-sectional study has been approved at the Research Ethics Committee of Tarbiat Modares University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Ethics code: IR.MODARES.REC.1398.157). The study was performed on 32 eligible women from June 2020 to July 2021 at Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran.

The participants consisted of two groups:

(1) A group of 16 nulliparous BC women who decided to use oocyte cryopreservation to fertility preservation because they were at risk of losing their fertility due to cancer treatment. Their cancer was diagnosed by histological examination and the stage of the disease was definitive. They had not received any neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

(2) The control group consisted of 16 healthy women who referred to the Royan Institute for IVF/ICSI due to primary infertility. These women did not suffer from certain diseases and the cause of their infertility was mild to moderate male factor (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Flow chart of this cross-sectional study.

All the participants in this study were at reproductive age (15–49 years). They did not take vitamin D supplements or Oral Contraceptive Pills (OCPs) for at least three months before stimulation, and were not on a special diet such as a vegetarian diet. Moreover, they were not taking certain medications like laxatives, steroids, cholesterol-lowering drugs, seizure-control drugs, rifampin, and orlistat. None of them had specific diseases such as liver disease, kidney disease, celiac disease, cystic fibrosis and Crohn's disease, or history of weight loss surgeries that reduce the size of the stomach and/or bypass part of the small intestine. Women with poor ovarian response according to Bologna criteria31, polycystic ovary syndrome according to Rotterdam criteria32, endometriosis, and body mass index (BMI) higher than 30 kg/m2 were not included in the study.

The eligible women were recruited in the study after obtaining written consent and answering a questionnaire, including demographic information, and questions regarding fertility, sun exposure, and physical activity. After evaluation of the pelvic ultrasound and hormonal profiles including Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) mIU/mL, Luteinizing Hormone (LH) mIU/mL and Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) ng/mL, ovarian stimulation with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol was started in both groups.

The control group and women with BC who were in the early follicular phase received a starting dosage of recombinant FSH on day 2–3 of the menstrual cycle for four or five consecutive days, but in the BC women who were in the late follicular/luteal phase, ovarian stimulation was done with a random start33. The initial dose was determined by the patient's age, BMI, AMH, and Antral Follicle Count (AFC). Serial folliculometry was performed by ultrasound, and subsequently, the gonadotropin dose was adjusted according to the ovarian response. The GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix, Cetrotide® 0.25 mg, Serono, Germany) started at 12 mm follicle size and continued until the trigger day. When at least two follicles had reached 17–18 mm, ovulation was triggered with 0.2 mg of Triptorelin (GnRH agonist, Decapeptyl®, Ferring GmbH, Kiel, Germany) in BC women and 1 ml of Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (r-hCG) (Ovitrelle® 250 µg/0.5 ml, Merck, Germany) in the control group. After 34–36 h, oocyte retrieval was performed via transvaginal ultrasound-guided. In the women with BC, Letrozole 5 mg/day (Femati®, Atipharmed, Iran) was used from the beginning of ovarian stimulation and continued until oocyte retrieval.

Serum and FF samples were collected from all women on the day of oocyte retrieval and kept frozen at − 80 °C. At the end of sampling stage, serum and FF 25(OH) D levels were measured using the Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Cobas® Elecsys Vitamin D Total (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). In this study, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH) D) deficiency was considered less than 20 ng/ml; its insufficiency was 20–30 ng/ml and its replete level was more than 30 ng/ml34,35. FF 25(OH) D norm remains unknown. To obtain clear FF and prevent contamination by the flushing medium during the aspiration procedure or the FF of other follicles, the samples were aspirated only from the available lead follicle. The FF samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatants were stored at − 80 °C.

On the day of oocyte retrieval, the oocytes in each woman were evaluated by an embryologist for (a) the number of oocytes retrieved, (b) the number of Metaphase II (MII) oocytes, (c) oocyte maturity (number of MII oocytes/total number of oocytes × 100), and (d) quality of MII oocytes. Oocyte dysmorphisms were divided into cytoplasmic anomalies (e.g., presence of vacuoles, refractile bodies, increased granularity, and smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregations) and extracytoplasmic anomalies (e.g., irregular shape or thickness of the zona pellucida, abnormal morphology of the first polar body, and perivitelline space)29. In the Royan Institute, the quality of MII oocytes is classified into four categories based on morphological criteria: Morph, Slightly dysmorph, Dysmorph and Highly dysmorph36.

Statistical analysis

The collected data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (ver. 20). Qualitative and quantitative data were presented using frequency (percent) and mean (standard deviation). According to Farzadi et al., the difference in the mean levels of vitamin D between the pregnant and non-pregnant women was 4.2 units (11.5 ng/ml vs. 15.8 ng/ml i with a assumed standard deviation of equal 4.5) and type I and II errors of 0.05 and 0.20, The total number of estimated sample size was 36 (18 in each group)26. During the study, two participants in each group left the study and finally 16 people in each group entered the study. The data were summarized as mean ± SD or n (%). Normality testing was performed with the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. Independent t-test and Mann–Whitney’s U test were used to compare the means between the two independent quantitative variables and Chi-square test was used for qualitative variables. Correlation between the variables was calculated by using the Spearman/Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Kruskal–Wallis test was employed for comparison between all classes of one variable with different number of samples. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tarbiat Modares University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.MODARES.REC.1398.157). All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Regional Research Committee and with the Declaration of Helsinki 1964 and its later amendments. After explaining the research purposes, informed written consent and verbal assent were obtained from all participants. They were informed that their participation was voluntary, confidential and anonymous, and that they had the right to withdraw from the research at any time.