Introduction

Eureka lemon is considered a popular type of lemon and is characterized by yellow fruits and greenish yellow pulp. It is sensitive to low temperature conditions. Their tree reaches 20 feet height. Their fruits are oval in shape and its colour from green to yellow when ripening. It contains acidic juice in its pulp that which is divided into 8–10 segments. Their fruits contains: peel (exocarp) which is thick outer shell, albedo (mesocarp) is a while spongy part, this is rich in pectin. Endo carp contains the juice and contains organic acid and sugar with water and acidic in taste. Some fruits have small oval white or yellowish-white seeds1. Lemon (Citrus limon L.) ranked as the third major grown citrus species after both orange and mandarin belongs2,3. It belongs to Rutaceae family4. The total lemon cultivated area in Najran city is approximately 9000 Dunum producing about 20,599 tons fruits per year with an average about 2.29 tons fruits per Dunum. The total production of lemon fruits in Saudi Aribia country about 51,000 ton fruits per year according to3.

The fruits contains natural flavor and preservative added to various foods and salad, sauces, and baked foods. Lemon juice is used as soft drinks and the addition food products to give acidic taste5. Lemon juice is an important source of vitamin C, which is good for immunity of the human body. Also, it is rich with flavonoids, antioxidants, which is useful in removing the free radicals that harm the tissue cells in the body, eating foods containing flavonoid protect from cancer and cardiovascular diseases6.

Nitrogen (N) is very important as mineral fertilizers for citrus and affects the growth, yield and quality of fruits. Potassium is effective in physiological functions like translocation of sugars, synthesis of proteins and cell division and growth. It is very useful in fruit growth and improves the size, flavor and color of fruits. Phosphorus is required in photosynthesis, synthesis and carbohydrates breakdown and energy transfer within plant. These days, chemical fertilizers are important in fruit crop nutrition, but using it in an excessive quantity has bad effect on soil, water and atmosphere which in turn animal and human health. It had also effect on soil fertility, water quality, yield and products quality7,8,9.

Therefore, organic manure and biofertilizers have been used for sustainable production, which improve soil physical, chemical and biological properties. Many researchers reviewed the significant role of organic and biofertilizers in improving the soil and plant properties for crops such as Sweet orange10,11; on lemon12,13,14.

Soil microbes are necessary in several ecosystem processes such as nutrient cycling and decomposition of organic matter, as well as enhancing plant health and growth15,16,17,18,19.

Regarding that, the goal of this study was to look into the possibility of lowering the high cost of chemical fertilizers (NPK), which have a direct impact on human health, by using less expensive alternatives that are also environmentally friendly, such as (chemical, slow release, and bio), and their effect on the productivity and fruit quality of Eureka Lemon Trees (Citrus limon L. Burm).

Materials and methods

The present investigation was undertaken during the two consecutive seasons of 2021 and 2022 in a private orchard at Nagran region, Saudia Arabia (latitude 17° 36′ N and 44° 26′ E) on 21 years old Eureka lemon trees. Thirty healthy fruitful Eureka lemon trees budded on sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) rootstock, were carefully selected and devoted for achieving this study. The selected trees were nearly uniform as possible as we could in their growth vigour, free from diseases, grown in clay loamy soil and planted at 4 × 5 m (210 trees/feddan) apart under drip irrigation system. Citrus fruits have been collected under the permission of Nagran University regulations. Plant materials are complied with the local and national regulations. The average temperature of 24.6 ± 5.3 °C and relative humidity of 73.2 ± 6.7%.

The soil texture in this trial was clay loamy textured. Moreover, mechanical and chemical analysis of the experimental soil is shown in Table 1. The results of soil and farmyard manure analysis according to20 are given in Table 1. All chosen trees received the recommended agriculture practices except fertilization. Thirty trees were arranged in a randomized complete block design, each treatment replicated three times with three trees per replicate.

Table 1 Some physical and chemical analysis of the experimental sandy soil used.

Accordingly the investigated NPK sources and bio-fertilizers soil applied fertilization treatments were as follows:

Without-Bio NPK

With-Bio NPK

T1: Control (100% chemical NPK)

T6: Control (100% chemical NPK)

T2: 75% chemical NPK + 25% natural sources

T7: 75% chemical NPK + 25% natural sources

T3: 50% chemical NPK + 50% natural sources

T8: 50% chemical NPK + 50% natural sources

T4: 25% chemical NPK + 75% natural sources

T9: 25% chemical NPK + 75% natural sources

T5: 100% natural sources

T10: 100% natural sources

Rate and application method of chemical NPK fertilizers.

Four rates of chemical fertilizers NPK were employed in this study. The first rate was 100% of NPK (1000:250:500 g/tree/year, respectively) were applied as 4.85 kg/tree ammonium sulphate (20.6% N), 1.60 kg/tree super phosphate (15.5% P2O5) and 1.00 kg/tree potassium sulphate (48% K2O). The second rate was 75% of NPK (750, 187.5 and 375 g per tree, respectively). The third rate was 50% of NPK (500, 125 and 250 g per tree, respectively). The fourth rate was 25% of NPK (250, 62.5 and 1255 g per tree, respectively). Nitrogen fertilizer was added on three doses, at March, the first of June and at the end of August. Whereas, potassium was applied on two doses, at the first of March and at the end of August with nitrogen fertilization.

Rate and application method of Natural alternative NPK fertilizations mixture (organic N and NPK raw mineral rocky materials).

However, other investigated alternate NPK fertilizers sources were: 1—granulated organic N fertilizer of 18–20% actual N, 2—two natural raw rocky materials, 1st as P fertilizer of 18–20% actual P2O5*, while 2nd as K fertilizer of 10–12% actual K2O. Were used in four rates (the first rate was 100% of alternate NPK (10:1.250:4.17 kg/tree/year, respectively). The second rate was 75% of alternate NPK (7.5, 0.937 and 3.13 g per tree, respectively). The third rate was 50% of alternate NPK (5, 0.625 and 2.08 kg per tree, respectively). The fourth rate was 25% of alternate NPK (2.5, 0.312 and 1.04 kg per tree, respectively). Were applied in soil (15 cm depth) in one dose in early December.

Rate and application Method of Bio-organic fertilizers:

A mixture of three types of bio-fertilizers (equal amounts for each) was investigated throughout this study. These types namely:

Phosphorene: a commercial phosphor bio-fertilizer, which contains some active fungi strains (Arbuscalar mycorrhiza).

Nitrobein: a commercial nitrogen bio-fertilizer contains special bacteria (Azotobacter choroccocum).

Potassein: a commercial potassium bio-fertilizer contains special bacteria (Bacillus pasteurii).

Each of the three bio-fertilizers mentioned above, were applied in soil (15 cm depth) to the wetted soil in one dose in early December at a rate of 50 ml per tree. These treatments were replicate three times.

Measurements

Yield per tree

At harvest time (first week of December in both seasons); the fruit yield of each tree was recorded as weight (kg).

Fruit quality measurements

In first week of December in both seasons, which is the harvest time, ten fruits from each tree or replicate were chosen randomly and taken to the laboratory to estimate their physical and chemical fruit characteristics. Fruit weight (g) was calculated by recording the average weight of 10 fruits from each tree/replicate. Average fruit length (L) and fruit diameter (D) were measured using a hand caliper. Fruit volume (cm3) was calculated by dipping the fruit in water and weighing the removed water. Also, the weight of the peel (g) and flesh (g) was estimated by electric digital balance (Model Vibra-Range 0–12,000 g ± 0.01 g, Japan). A Magness and Taylor pressure tester measured fruit firmness (Ib/in.2) with a 7/18-in. plunger.

The total soluble solids percent (T.S.S.%) was measured by using a hand refractometer (ATAGO Co., LTD., Tokyo, Japan) on the fresh-cut lemon fruit, and the result was expressed as a percentage (%). Total and reducing sugars were estimated calorimetrically using the Nelson arsenate–molybdate colorimetric method21. Non-reducing sugars were measured by the difference between total sugars and reducing sugars. The percentage of titratable acidity in fruit juice was determined using an A.O.A.C. method22, where it was expressed as g citric acid/100 ml of fruit juice. The TSS/acid ratio was calculated by dividing the value of TSS over the value of titratable acidity. Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) content of the juice was estimated by titration with 2,6-dichloro phenol-indo-phenol23 and calculated as mg/100 mg of juice.

All methods used in this study were carried out according to the guidelines regulations of Benha and Nagran Universities.

Statistical analysis

All the obtained data in the two seasons of study were statistically analyzed using the analysis of variance method according to24. However, means were distinguished by the Duncan’s multiple range test25. Since, capital letters were used for distinguishing means within each column or row that represented the specific effect of any investigated factor (NPK) applied level and some bio-fertilizers soil added however, the small letters were employed for interaction effect of their combinations.

Results

Yield per tree (kg)

Figure 1 shows the yield of lemon as affected by different NPK sources as replacement for chemical NPK. It could be seen that, adding bio-NPK had a positive influence on yield per tree in both seasons (kg). Increasing the rates of chemical NPK application also resulted in consistently significant increases in the values recorded for the yield per tree. As a result, the highest values were obtained during both studies seasons when the highest levels of chemical NPK (100 and 75%) were combined with bio-NPK.2.5. It could be seen that the highest values of yield (111.0 and 114.0 kg/tree) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for both first and second seasons, respectively. While, the lowest values of yield (89.75 and 90.34 kg/tree) were found with 100% natural sources for both first and second seasons, respectively.

Figure 1
figure 1

Effect of different NPK sources on yield of Eureka lemon trees during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.

Physical properties of the product

Fruit weight and fruit size

Fruit weight (g) and fruit size (cm3) of Eureka lemon trees were influenced by different levels of minerals NPK and their combinations with bio-NPK or without bio-NPK during the 2021 and 2022 seasons, according to data presented in Figs. 2 and 3. The results indicate that the fruit weight was 152.4, 148.0, 144.7, 142.4 and 131.3 g for 100% chemical NPK (control), 75% chemical NPK + 25% natural sources, 50% chemical NPK (control), 50% chemical NPK + 25% natural sources, 50% chemical NPK (control), 25% chemical NPK + 75% natural sources and 100% natural sources, respectively, for first season. Also, it was 153.5, 148.9, 145.5, 142.8 and 131.4 g for 100% chemical NPK (control), 75% chemical NPK + 25% natural sources, 50% chemical NPK (control), 50% chemical NPK + 25% natural sources, 50% chemical NPK (control), 25% chemical NPK + 75% natural sources and 100% natural sources, respectively, for second season.

Figure 2
figure 2

Effect of different NPK sources on fruit weight of Eureka lemon trees during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.

Figure 3
figure 3

Effect of different NPK sources on fruit size of Eureka lemon trees during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.

In terms of the effect of different NPK sources, data obtained during both seasons revealed that when compared to other treatments, all NPK levels and sources increased significantly in all investigated parameters. This was true throughout both seasons. Furthermore, in terms of fruit weight and size, the most effective levels were significantly associated with its highest levels (100% chemical NPK). The data presented in Figs. 2 and 3 revealed that the rate of response to bio-NPK was relatively pronounced with the different NPK sources. The highest levels of minerals NPK (100 and 75%) resulted in a slight increase in fruit weight and size when combined with bio-NPK. The highest values of fruit size (170.5 and 171.1 cm3) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for both first and second seasons, respectively. While, the lowest values of yield (152.1 and 152.4 cm3) were found with 100% natural sources for both first and second seasons, respectively.

Fruit dimensions and fruit shape index

Figures 4, 5 and 6 show the length and fruit diameter of Eureka lemon fruits were the investigated two fruit dimensions regarding their response to the differential nutritive compounds. The results show obviously that both parameters responded significantly to all treatments. However, rate of response was relatively higher with former fruit dimension (length) than other one (diameter). Moreover, first treatment (100% chemical NPK + bio-NPK) was the superior and resulted significantly in the tallest length and diameter. Statistically followed by the 2nd treatment 100% chemical NPK + bio-NPK). Such trend was true during both experimental seasons for both length and fruit diameter. The results indicate that, the variability in the fruit shape index (length: diameter) of Eureka lemon fruits in response to the various tested treatments were relatively too small to be taken into consideration statistically. Herein, it can be stated that during both experimental seasons, fruits that had been treated with fertilizers, whether separately or in combination with bio-NPK, tended to be slightly oblong in shape. The highest values of fruit length and fruit diameter (79.47 and 70.11 cm) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for first season. While, the lowest values of fruit length and fruit diameter (76.96 and 65.56 cm) were found with 100% natural sources for first season. Also, the highest values of fruit length and fruit diameter (79.56 and 70.50 cm) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for second season. While, the lowest values of fruit length and fruit diameter (77.02 and 66.00 cm) were found with 100% natural sources for second season.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of different NPK sources on fruit length of Eureka lemon trees during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.

Figure 5
figure 5

Effect of different NPK sources on fruit diameter of Eureka lemon trees during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of different NPK sources on fruit dimension (F.L./F.D.) of Eureka lemon trees during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.

Flesh weight, fruit firmness and juice

Figures 7, 8 and 9 demonstrate unequivocally that the various NPK sources treatments had a positive impact on the recorded flesh weight (g), fruit firmness (lb/in.2) and juice (%) in both seasons. Additionally, by increasing the application rates of chemical NPK, the values recorded for the various above-mentioned parameters (Flesh weight and juice %) showed consistent considerable increases. Accordingly, the highest values for the different parameters were recorded when the highest level of chemical NPK (100 and 75%) was combined with bio-NPK during both seasons of study. On the contrary, the least values were significantly in concomitant to the 100% nature sources of NPK during both seasons. As application rates of chemical NPK were increased, fruit hardness gradually increased significantly. Accordingly, the maximum values for the various fruit's firmness were noted during both study seasons when the highest level of chemical NPK (100 and 75%) was combined without bio-NPK. The highest values of flesh weight, fruit firmness and juice percentage (90.10 g, 13.82 lb/in.2 and 45.85%) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for first season. While, the lowest values of flesh weight, fruit firmness and juice percentage (76.32 g, 11.59 lb/in.2 and 38.63%) were found with 100% natural sources for first season. Also, the highest values of flesh weight, fruit firmness and juice percentage (90.91 g, 14.17 lb/in.2 and 46.69%) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for second season. While, the lowest values of flesh weight, fruit firmness and juice percentage (76.67 g, 11.77 lb/in.2 and 39.14%) were found with 100% natural sources for second season.

Figure 7
figure 7

Effect of different NPK sources on flesh weight of Eureka lemon fruits during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.

Figure 8
figure 8

Effect of different NPK sources on fruit firmness of Eureka lemon fruits during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.

Figure 9
figure 9

Effect of different NPK sources on Juice percentage of Eureka lemon fruits during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.

Fruit chemical properties

The five tested fruit juice chemical characteristics for Eureka lemon fruits regarding their response to the evaluated treatments were total soluble solids (TSS)%, total acidity%, TSS/acid ratio, total sugars%, and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) contents. Tables 2 and 3 display the data obtained during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022. The results indicate that, the majority of the measured juice quality parameters (TSS%, juice acidity%, TSS/acid ratio, total sugars%, and vitamin C concentration) responded favorably to higher chemical NPK treatment rates. With the highest application amounts of the chemical NPK (100 and 75%) with bio-NPK, the highest values for these characteristics were obtained in both seasons. However, during both experimental seasons, the lowest results were found when the highest concentrations of natural sources (100 and 75%) were used independently or in combination with bio-NPK. The highest values of TSS (9.41 and 9.46%) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for both first and second seasons, respectively. While, the lowest values of TSS (7.80 and 7.91%) were found with 100% natural sources for both first and second seasons, respectively. The highest values of acidity (6.17 and 6.25%) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for both first and second seasons, respectively. While, the lowest values of acidity (5.61 and 5.60%) were found with 100% natural sources for both first and second seasons, respectively. The highest values of TSS/acidity (1.524 and 1.511) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for both first and second seasons, respectively. While, the lowest values of TSS/acidity (1.392 and 1.412) were found with 100% natural sources for both first and second seasons, respectively.

Table 2 Effect of different NPK sources on TSS, acidity and TSS/acidity of Eureka lemon fruits during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.
Table 3 Effect of different NPK sources on total sugars and Vitamin C of Eureka lemon fruits during the experimental seasons of 2021 and 2022.

The highest values of total sugars (1.80 and 1.84%) were found with 100% natural sources for both first and second seasons, respectively. While, the lowest values of total sugars (1.58 and 1.64%) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for both first and second seasons, respectively. Meanwhile, the highest values of vitamin C (41.27 and 42.21 mg/100 g) were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for both first and second seasons, respectively. While, the lowest values of vitamin C (36.54 and 37.17 mg/100 g) were found with 100% natural sources for both first and second seasons, respectively.

Discussion

The results of the effect adding bio-NPK to lemon, where lemon leaf’s SLA, SLW, and RGR were significantly affected by the two biofertilizers treatments with NPK treatments. Al-Freeh et al.26 reported that Oat plants treated with biofertilizers gave a higher rate of RGR in the two seasons under study. Also, Kumari et al.27 reported that biofertilizers with NPK gave a higher value of RGR in baby corn plants. Biofertilizers work on the development of root structure and increase the flow rate of root xylem as a result of increasing and providing absorption of water and suitable nutrient elements, which leads to a difference in growth rates from plants not treated with biofertilizers28,29.

The T. harzianum with NPK fertilizer had significantly effect, where it increased the leaf chlorophyll content (44.61%) and chlorophyll fluorescence (F0) (18.36%) over the control plants. Photosynthetic yield (Fv/Fm) and SPAD value of wheat leaves under osmotic stress were increased significantly with the addition of biofertilizers30. Mohammed et al.31 reported that biofertilizers better affected leaf chlorophyll content on pear trees. Soil inoculation of biofertilizers with chemical fertilizer affects rice growth and yield by increasing leaf area and leaf chlorophyll content32. Organic fertilizer application increased chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, and net photosynthetic rate of pear jujube trees33. Osman and El-Rhman34 clarified that biofertilizers gave the highest value of leaf total chlorophyll content of fig trees. Biofertilizers produce plant growth hormones (auxin) and organic acids that promote plant growth and enzyme activities and increase chlorophyll content in plant leaves35. Arefe et al.36 also reported that biofertilizers positively affected chlorophyll content (SAPD value) in basil leaves. In this study, stomatal conductance was positively affected by biofertilizer treatments with NPK. The addition of microbes with inorganic fertilizer may increase the mineral nutrients and water absorptions by improving the root system, thus affecting the leaf stomatal conductance of lemon trees.

Fruit quality characteristics of limau nipis were significantly improved with reduced rates of NPK fertilizers. Our study’s findings agree with the results of37, who reported that biofertilizers and farmyard manure with NPK doses improved fruit quality like fruit number, the weight of fruit, and fruit dimension of Eureka lemon trees. Also, Ennab38 reported that soil inoculation of beneficial fungi and bacteria improved fruit quality in strawberries. Dheware and Waghmare10 mentioned that biofertilizers with NPK increased the number of fruits and weight of fruits in sweet orange. Hadole et al.19 reported that the Nagpur mandarin tree was affected by biofertilizers plus NPK, where the yield increased by 50% more than the control treatment. Improved fruit growth and quality could be ascribed to the constant supply of nutrients, especially potassium, higher concentrations of soil enzymes, and growth-promoting substances produced by soil-applied microorganisms, which may have aided in the biosynthesis and translocation of carbohydrates into the fruit39. It has been reported that biofertilizers application increased the level of endogenous auxins hormone in treated plants40. These elevated levels of auxins in the fruit can promote the sink potential of the fruits, which is positively correlated with the fruit growth rate41.

Regarding the soil inoculation of B. thuringiensis, it increased the number of fruits (81.81%), fruit weight (55.52%), fruit diameter (43.54%), fruit dimension (35.69%), pulp to peel ratio (94.87%) and fruit juice content (65.36%) compared to the control group. Soil inoculation of Bacillus sppincreases the growth and biomass of roots, shoots, and leaves42,43, synthesis of plant growth regulators (IAA, GAs, Cytokinins, and Spermidines)43,44, and elevate the levels of photosynthetic pigments, sugars, amino acids, proteins, and mineral nutrients in plants43,45 and increase fruit yield46. The nitrogenase (nifH) gene of the Bacillus spp. produces enzyme nitrogenase which can fix atmospheric N2 and supply to plants for stimulation of plant growth and yield47. Bacillus spp. synthesis plant growth regulators enhance cell division and cell elongation during fruit set and development43,44. Bacillus spp. also secretes the enzyme ACC deaminase, which inhibits the synthesis of ethylene in plants and enhances the growth of the plants48,49. Ismail et al.50 reported that fruit quality can be improved only at the production level, but after harvest, the fruits can only maintain their quality. Our results reported that biofertilizers treatment increased the leaf and fruit TSS content limau nipis. Fruit TSS content of Eureka lemon trees is significantly affected by biofertilizers and farm manure which reduce the rate of NPK37. It was reported earlier that soil application of biofertilizers increased the fruit TSS content of guava trees51. Ye et al.34 also stated that applying organic fertilizer improved the total soluble solids content and fruit quality of Jujube. Increasing TSS content in leaves and fruits may be due to improved net photosynthetic rates and plant growth, which increases the accumulation of photosynthates and nutrients, and transfer accumulates to fruits causing improved fruit quality52. The solubilization of mineral nutrients, synthesis of plant growth regulators and secondary metabolites, and enzyme secretions from T. harzianum and B. thuringiensis confirm their biofertilizer effects on lemon trees towards improving growth physiology, and fruit quality of limau nipis. These results agreed with those obtained by53,54,55,56.

Conclusions

This work concluded that adding bio-NPK to lemon tree had great effect on yield and production compared to the chemical NPK, where, the highest values for the various parameters were obtained when the highest level of minerals NPK (100%) was combined with bio-NPK, followed by 75% minerals NPK + 25% of alternative NPK combined with bio-NPK, which could be safely advised given their favourable effects on productivity and fruit quality characteristics. The highest value of yield was 114.0 kg/tree for all treatments under study. The lemon fruit weight ranged from 131.3 to 153.5 g for all treatments under study. The highest values of TSS, juice acidity, TSS/Acid ratio, and vitamin C concentration were 9.45%, 6.25%, 1.524 and 4.27 mg/100 g, respectively, were found with 100% chemical NPK (control) for both two seasons. Future studies are recommended to investigate under range bio-NPK on the storability.