Abstract
After the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, a novel mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) was developed at an unprecedented speed. Although most countries have achieved widespread immunity from vaccines and infections, yet people, even who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection, are recommended to receive vaccination due to their effectiveness in lowering the risk of recurrent infection. However, the BNT162b2 vaccine has been reported to increase the risk of myocarditis. To our knowledge, for the first time in this study, we tracked changes in the chromatin dynamics of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in the patient who underwent myocarditis after BNT162b2 vaccination. A longitudinal study of chromatin accessibility using concurrent analysis of single-cell assays for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing and single-cell RNA sequencing showed downregulation of interferon signaling and upregulated RUNX2/3 activity in PBMCs. Considering BNT162b2 vaccination increases the level of interferon-α/γ in serum, our data highlight the immune responses different from the conventional responses to the vaccination, which is possibly the key to understanding the side effects of BNT162b2 vaccination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected more than 600 million patients, resulting in more than 6 million deaths worldwide. The cumulative number of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines administered has surged to almost 130 million1. One of the most administered vaccines is the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA. Despite its effectiveness in protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, the BNT162b2 vaccine has recently been reported to be associated with an increased risk of myocarditis. Its pathogenesis remains unknown2,3.
Recent studies on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection have identified important transcriptomic signatures4, which include changes in genes involved in interferon (IFN) signal transduction and natural killer (NK) cell maturation5. Along with clinical findings that indicate type I IFN deficiency in the blood of severe SARS-CoV-2 patients6,7, recombinant type I IFN, although controversial, has brought attention as a potential therapeutic agent for SARS-CoV-2 infection8. Compared with other respiratory viruses, SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to weak IFN (type I and III) responses while inducing robust expression of interleukin-6 and chemokines9. Low innate antiviral defenses resulting from low levels of IFN have been considered a driving feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection9.
However, there are relatively few studies focusing on the characterization of the immune landscape of patients showing side effects after BNT162b2 administration despite the surging number of shots. To our knowledge, currently, there are no studies identifying the epigenomic landscape of immune cells of BNT162b2-induced myocarditis patients in single-cell resolution, which may provide deep insight regarding the pathogenesis of vaccine-induced myocarditis. Here, we applied a single-cell sequencing assay for transposase-accessible chromatin (scATAC-seq) with single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in a patient with BNT162b2-induced myocarditis at the acute inflammatory stage and after remission. A comprehensive understanding of changes in the immune landscape accompanied by BNT162b2-induced myocarditis showed global upregulation of RUNX and downregulation of IFN.
Results
Overview of longitudinal analysis in single-cell resolution from peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMCs) of a patient with myocarditis after BNT162B2 vaccination
Previously, we had reported the peripheral immune landscape of a 59-year-old male patient who had developed severe myocarditis after BNT162b2 vaccination10. Blood was collected at two time points: immediately after the onset of myocarditis and after the patient completely recovered from myocarditis. The immune response of patients with myocarditis after BNT162b2 vaccination was analyzed in more detail by comparing vaccinated individuals without side effects, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and Kawasaki disease patients at the single-cell level11. To further analyze the dynamic changes in the epigenomic landscape associated with myocarditis resulting from BNT162b2 vaccination, we performed a parallel single-cell sequencing assay for transposase-accessible chromatin (scATAC-seq), in addition to transcriptomic analysis, on two PBMC samples collected at different time points (Fig. 1A). We obtained scATAC-seq datasets from 20,519 PBMCs collected at two time points after quality control.
We evaluated batch correction through dimensionality reduction uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) and performed graph-based clustering on scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq, which identified 25 and 16 clusters, respectively (Fig. S1A-C). Each scRNA-seq cluster was annotated based on the transcriptional profiles of canonical immune cell markers (Fig. S1D, and S1E). The scATAC-seq clusters were initially identified using the label transfer function of Signac TransferData and further identified by gene activity and computed by counting the number of sequenced fragments overlapping with the gene body and a 2 kb upstream region from transcription start sites (TSS) for each gene (Figs. 1B,C, S1F, and S1G). Next, we verified cell annotations using chromVAR motif activities of the regions important in lineage-specific differentiation and activation. The motifs used for annotation verification were as follows: SPI1 (PU.1) for myeloid and B cells12, CEBPB for monocytes13, TCF12 for B cells14, TCF7 for T cells15, and TBX21 (t-bet) for CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells, NK cells, and B cells16 (Fig. 1D). Co-embedding scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq data into a single UMAP visualization validated cluster annotations with a high overlap rate (Fig. S2A–E).
Next, we analyzed the distribution of immune cell populations at different time points. The fraction of each cluster presented minimal change between myocarditis and recovery states, except for plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC), which is the cluster with the smallest cell number (Figs. 1E, and S3A). Thus, the cell fractions of most immune cells were similar between the two time points, indicating that immune cell composition is not a key contributing factor for the development of myocarditis. We computed the differentially accessible region (DAR) of each cluster (Fig. 1F). In contrast to the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in scRNA-seq, chromatin accessibility was most dynamically changed in cytotoxic NK and CD8 effector T cells in scATAC-seq (Fig. S3B). The location of the DAR was annotated with clusterProfiler (Fig. S3C and S3D). We performed single-cell TCR sequencing (scTCR-seq) analysis to investigate T-cell immunity. However, the most abundant complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) sequence showed minimal changes (Fig. S3E). In contrast, we observed increased gene activities of immune activation marker genes17 in the CD8 effector and cytotoxic NK cluster at myocarditis state (Fig. S4A–C). Furthermore, the up-regulation of motif activity and gene activity in fatty acid metabolism related genes at acute myocarditis validated the scATAC-seq data by demonstrating consistency with the results of the scRNA-seq analysis11 (Fig. S5A–D).
Upregulation of RUNX transcriptional activity at the acute myocarditis stage
Changes in chromatin openness can modulate the availability of binding sites for TFs and control gene expression18. To assess the binding affinity of TFs, we used chromVAR, which calculates the bias-corrected TF accessibility deviation for each motif across genome-wide signals19. According to chromVAR analysis, RUNX2 and RUNX3 motifs are globally upregulated across most cell types during acute myocarditis in terms of motif activity (Fig. 2A and B). The RUNX family is a key regulator of development and differentiation, especially of blood cells20. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests the importance of RUNX in the immune response against pathogens, including viruses, such as the Epstein-Barr virus and Influenza A21,22.
The RUNX family has a highly conserved DNA-binding domain and shares a consensus-binding motif sequence23 (Fig. 2C). To find the major RUNX gene important in myocarditis pathogenesis, we compared the expression levels of RUNX2 and RUNX3 (Fig. 2D). Although RUNX2 and RUNX3 showed upregulation of their motif activities in myocarditis, their mRNA expression levels indicated minimal changes between the two time points, highlighting the importance of ATAC-seq for understanding the gene-modulatory network. Since RUNX3 exhibits higher expression levels across all cell subpopulations than RUNX2, we propose RUNX3 as the primary TF upregulated during acute myocarditis. Notably, the accessibility of the chromatin regions overlapping with the ENCODE ChIP-seq peak of RUNX3 increased in the myocarditis state (Fig. S6).
RUNX3 is involved in the interleukin-15-dependent activation of NK cells24 and the proliferation and cytotoxicity of CD8 T cells25. RUNX3 was also highly enriched in NK and T cells during myocarditis in terms of motif activity (Fig. 2E), and increased accessibility of RUNX3 was confirmed across the whole genome (Fig. 2F). Thus, the TF RUNX3 showed the highest increase in activity during myocarditis.
Suppression of type 1 IFN signaling at the acute myocarditis stage
Next, we investigated TFs whose activities were downregulated at the time of acute myocarditis in the cell subpopulations with the highest number of DEGs. In NK cells and CD8 effector cells, IFN regulatory factors (IRFs) showed the highest degree of downregulation in the myocarditis state (Fig. 3A). IRF family consists of nine members (IRF1–IRF9) and plays a crucial role in IFN production and response against viral infection and inflammation26. IFN, a pleiotropic cytokine that regulates the immune response, has two major families: type I IFN (IFNα and IFNβ) and type II IFN (IFNγ). During viral infection, viral DNA and RNA activate IRF3/IRF7, which activates IFNA/IFNB gene transcription27,28. Secreted IFNα or IFNβ binds to the IFN-α/β receptor on the surface of almost all cell types, leading to the formation of the STAT1/STAT2/IRF9 complex, known as the ISGF3 complex. This complex initiates the transcription of IFN-stimulated genes to stimulate an immune response to eliminate the viral infection.
Previous studies have reported a decrease in the level of type I IFNs in the blood and the amount of type 1 IFN production from blood immune cells in patients with severe symptoms of COVID-196,29. In our datasets, although the gene activity and RNA expression level of IRF3 showed minimal changes (Figs. S7A, and B), the motif activity of IRF3 and IRF7 was decreased at myocarditis state across all cell subpopulations except for pDCs and memory B cells (Figs. 3B–D, and S7C). When we compared the openness of genomic regions predicted to be the sites of IRF3/7 binding, chromatin accessibility was reduced in myocarditis CD8 effector and cytotoxic NK cells (Fig. S8A, and B).
In addition to IFNα/β production, we investigated changes in motif activity in IFNα/β receivers. IFNα/β induced the transcription of IFNα/β response genes by the activation of the ISGF3 complex, which consists of a heterodimer of STAT1 and STAT2 (STAT1::STAT2) and IRF9 (Fig. 3E). Consistent with the downregulation of motif activities of IRF3 and IRF7, peripheral immune cells showed a reduced motif activity level of STAT1::STAT2 and IRF9 at the time of myocarditis (Fig. 3F). In addition, we performed Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA), which calculates gene set enrichment scores for a sample to validate changes in RNA expression profile in response to Type I IFN30. A decrease in IFNα/β-related gene expression was primarily observed in T cells. IFNβ had a more profound influence on the immune cell response in myocarditis (Fig. 3G).
Suppression of type 2 IFN signaling at the acute myocarditis stage
The only member of the type II IFN family, IFNγ, is essential for the inflammatory response triggered by viral infections. Adaptive immune cells, including CD4 T helper type 1 cells, γδT cells, activated NK cells, and cytotoxic CD8 T cells, secrete IFNγ upon viral infection. Secreted IFNγ induces nuclear entry of the STAT1 homodimer into immune cells and initiates the transcription of primary response genes, such as IRF1.
We first investigated the mRNA expression levels and distribution patterns of IFN-γ. Cytotoxic NK and CD8 T cells showed abundant expression and decreased expression levels at the time of myocarditis, respectively (Figs. 4A, S9A). In addition, there was a mild decrease in chromatin accessibility with a reduction in mRNA expression level at the region, which Cicero predicts as a cis-regulatory DNA region for IFNG transcription (Fig. S9B).
Considering IFNγ signaling-recipient cells, decreased motif activity in STAT1 across multiple cell types in myocarditis suggests that the response to IFNγ secreted from cytotoxic NK and CD8 effector cells was downregulated (Fig. 4B, S9C, and D). IRF1, a target gene of the IFNγ signaling pathway, was also downregulated at the myocarditis state (Figs. 4C, and S9E). The GSVA score analyzed from mRNA expression levels advocates blunted response to IFNγ in CD14 monocyte, cytotoxic NK, CD8 T, Treg, CD4 memory, and CD4 naïve cells (Fig.4D and E). Therefore, the immune system of a patient with acute myocarditis after BNT162b2 vaccination exhibited impaired IFN signaling, although aggregated peaks in the regulatory element of pro-inflammatory cytokine were increased (Fig. S10). Considering that BNT162b2 vaccination induces the upregulation of serum IFN levels, the patient with the side effect of vaccination is likely to develop immune responses different from what has been known31.
Discussion
Inferring molecular dynamics during disease progression is challenging, particularly when there are large time gaps between sampling points32 Analysis based only on the expression levels is not sufficient to map the major driving force, such as key TFs, in the longitudinal analysis of the patient. Investigation of chromatin accessibility is an effective tool for studying active regulatory DNA33.
Gene expression levels can typically be assessed by measuring the amount of mRNA transcripts and the binding efficiency of gene modulators to the promoter region. However, the role of regulatory elements in controlling target gene expression has recently been highlighted in various biological processes33. Thus, TF activities can be comprehensively estimated by changes in chromatin accessibility of the regions across promoters and cis-regulatory elements that affect the binding of TFs to motifs19. Here, we found that gene expression modulators were differentially regulated at the time of myocarditis (Fig. 5). In addition, the activity of genes that could not be identified in the sparse RNA matrix can be predicted through the successful analysis of chromatin accessibility in the gene body, promoter, and cis-elements33,34.
Integrated analysis of scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq from our results revealed a downregulated IFN signaling pathway and upregulated gene activities of IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, and IL-21. Thus, patients with myocarditis after BNT162b2 vaccination displayed a hallmark of decreased IFN (type I and type III) signaling and increased IL-6 production, which resembles the characteristics of bronchial epithelial cells. Peripheral immunity facilitates the landscape of patients with severe SARS-coV-2 infection6,9. Recently, the use of recombinant type I IFN as a treatment for COVID-19 was reported in a clinical trial8,35. After booster vaccination in healthy adults, IFNγ secretion increases in CD8 and CD4 T cells36. Meta-analysis in COVID-19 patients with or without severe symptoms also reported that patients with severe COVID-19 have a high IL-6/IFNγ ratio37. Therefore, IFN signaling in patients with myocarditis after vaccination appears to be similar to that in patients with severe COVID-19.
Viral myocarditis is a combination of direct cardiomyocyte damage and immune-mediated cell death38. In particular, NK cells play a crucial role in defense against acute viral pathogens, such as coxsackievirus B and murine cytomegalovirus39. In patients with severe COVID-19, the activity of NK cells in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) increased, although the IFN response was blunted because the NK population was redistributed to BAL as a result of increased chemokines in BAL in patients with severe COVID-1940,41. High chemokine levels are also present in the plasma of patients with myocarditis by COVID-19, and NK cells can potentially be attracted to cardiomyocytes42. However, the number of NK cells in COVID-19 patients with severe symptoms is negatively correlated with IFNγ concentration41. In this study, we verified decreased IFN signaling in the NK cells of patients with severe side effects of BNT162b2 vaccination by analyzing epigenomic profiles. In future studies, more attention should be paid to IFN signaling in NK cells in myocarditis.
Methods
Ethics statement
The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital (UC19TIDE0142). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Sample preparation
Blood was collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-coated tubes and mixed with the same amount of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Blood with PBS was then transferred to a leucosep tube. After centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 15 min at room temperature, the supernatant originating from the blood was collected in a 50 ml conical tube. The cells from the supernatant were washed twice by centrifugation at 400 × g for 10 min at room temperature. The supernatant was removed. Cells were counted and resuspended in a solution (1:9 DMSO: Fetal bovine serum). After 24 h in a cell container in a –80 °C deep freezer, the stock was stored in a liquid nitrogen tank.
scATAC-seq (macrogen)
LUNA-FL Automated Fluorescence Cell Counter (Logos Biosystems) was used to consult the 10 × Genomics Single Cell Protocols Cell Preparation Guide and the Guidelines for Optimal Sample Preparation Flowchart (Documents CG00053 and CG000126, respectively) for more information on the cell preparation. The prepared cells were used for nuclei isolation according to the guidelines (Documents CG000169). Nuclei suspensions were incubated in a Transposition Mix that included transposase. Libraries were prepared using a chromium controller according to the 10 × Chromium Single Cell ATAC protocol (CG000209). Transposed nuclei were mixed with master mix and loaded with single-cell ATAC gel beads and partitioning oil into a chromium chip H. Transposed DNA fragments from single cells were uniquely barcoded within each droplet during thermal incubation. The barcoded DNA fragments were pooled in one tube and subjected to sample-index PCR. The purified libraries were quantified using qPCR according to the qPCR Quantification Protocol. Guide (KAPA) and qualified using an Agilent Technologies 4200 TapeStation (Agilent Technologies). The libraries were then sequenced using the HiSeq platform (Illumina) according to the read length in the user guide.
scRNA-seq processing
The scRNA-seq dataset, SRR18209602 and SRR18209603, was obtained from a previous study. Datasets were counted with the cellranger v6.143 pipeline using a human reference dataset (GRCh38) of 10X Genomics43. Subsequently, datasets were preprocessed with Seurat v4.2.044 to remove low-quality cells using the following options: 200 < nFeatures < 4000, nCount < 15,000, percent.mt < 5. The filtered counts were normalized using the SCTransform45 function, with regression of the mitochondrial and ribosomal gene percentages. We used the FindIntegrationAnchors and IntegrateData commands for canonical correlation analysis (CCA) of Seurat to correct the batch effect. After integration, counts were log-normalized with the NoramlizeData function in Seurat and scaled with the ScaleData function with the default setting. The RunUMAP function was used with the first 30 PCs identified in the elbow plot to analyze the dimensional reduction. Clustering was performed using FindNeighbors and FindClusters functions, with a resolution of 0.6. Differential expression between cell types and samples was assessed with the Seurat FindMarkers function for genes detected in at least 10% of cells, higher than 0.25 logFC and lower than 0.05 FDR. The cluster annotation was performed in two steps. Annotation was performed by mapping to the azimuth human PBMC reference dataset using the FindVariableFeatures and FindTransferAnchors functions of Seurat. The initial annotation was corrected according to marker gene expression. Because the scRNA-seq expression matrix is sparse, the imputation of missing values was performed for visualization using the expression recovery algorithm ALRA46.
scATAC-seq processing
scATAC-seq datasets were counted with the cellranger-atac 2.1.047 pipeline using a human reference dataset (GRCh38) from 10X Genomics. Subsequently, datasets were preprocessed with Signac v1.8.048 to remove low-quality cells with the following options: 3000 < peak region fragments < 30,000, 15 < pct reads in peaks, 2 < TSS enrichment, nucleosome signal < 4. The filtered counts were normalized using the RunTFIDF function, in which frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) normalizes across cells to correct for differences in cellular sequencing depth and across peaks to give higher values to more rare peaks. Before integration, we created a common peak set across datasets using the reduce function of the GenomicRanges package and quantified peaks in each dataset using the Signac FeatureMatrix. Dimensional analysis was performed using singular value decomposition of the TF-IDF matrix after merging the data. To correct the batch effect among datasets, the Harmony v0.1.049 package was used with 2–50 latent semantic indexing (LSI). The first LSI component was confirmed to be a technical variation through the DeptCor of Signac. To analyze dimensional reduction, the RunUMAP function was used with 2–20 LSIs identified in the elbow plot. Clustering was performed using FindNeighbors and FindClusters functions, with a resolution of 0.6. To quantify the accessibility of chromatin associated with each gene, a gene activity matrix was produced by counting the number of fragments intersecting the gene body and promoter region using protein-coding genes annotated in the Ensembl database (EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86). Gene activity was log-normalized and scaled before annotation. Differential chromatin accessibility between cell types and samples was assessed with the Signac FindMarkers function for gene activities detected in at least 10% of cells and higher than 0.25 logFC and lower than 0.05 FDR. The gene closest to each of the differentially accessible peaks was defined using the ClosestFeature function of Signac. Cluster annotation was performed in two steps. Label transfer was conducted using an existing scRNA-seq dataset as a reference using the FindTransferAnchors and TransferData functions of Seurat. The initial annotation was corrected according to the marker gene activity and lineage-specific motif activity. Genomic regions containing scATAC-seq peaks were annotated, except for clusters without significant DAR, with ChIPSeeker 1.32.150 and clusterProfiler 4.4.451 using the UCSC database on hg38.
Motif analysis (chromVAR)
We performed Motif analysis using choromVAR v 3.3.219. Motif information was added to the peak matrix by Signac AddMotifs using motif position frequency matrices from the JASPAR 2020 database. ChromVAR activities were calculated using the RunChromVAR wrapper in Signac after matching the set of background peaks. The differential activity was computed using the FindMarker function. We performed TF footprinting using the Footprint of Signac48 and visualized the PlotFootprint to predict the binding location of a TF.
Cis-element co-accessibility
We constructed cis-co-accessible networks (CCANs) with Cicero v 1.3.033 from the scATAC-seq peak. The Seurat object was converted to the CellDataSet (CDS) format of Monocle3 using the as.cell_data_set function of the SeuratWrappers package. CCAN, calculated using the run_cicero function of monole3, utilized a k-nearest-neighbors approach, which creates overlapping sets of cells.
Data availability
scATAC seq data and single-cell VDJ analysis relevant to the manuscript have been uploaded to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) BioProjectID PRJNA910983 (Reviewer link: https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA910983?reviewer=banqjkfk0slvf5oojvl5vro65g).
References
Dong, E., Du, H. & Gardner, L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 533–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1 (2020).
Barda, N. et al. Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in a nationwide setting. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 1078–1090. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2110475 (2021).
Im, J. H. et al. Adverse events with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among korean healthcare workers. Yonsei. Med. J. 62, 1162–1168. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2021.62.12.1162 (2021).
Zhang, Y. H. et al. Identifying transcriptomic signatures and rules for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 627302. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.627302 (2020).
Bibert, S. et al. Transcriptomic signature differences between SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza virus infected patients. Front. Immunol. 12, 666163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.666163 (2021).
Hadjadj, J. et al. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Science 369, 718–724. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc6027 (2020).
Choi, H. & Shin, E. C. Roles of type I and III interferons in COVID-19. Yonsei. Med. J. 62, 381–390. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2021.62.5.381 (2021).
Sallard, E., Lescure, F. X., Yazdanpanah, Y., Mentre, F. & Peiffer-Smadja, N. Type 1 interferons as a potential treatment against COVID-19. Antivir. Res. 178, 104791–104816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104791 (2020).
Blanco-Melo, D. et al. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 181, 1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.026 (2020).
Yoon, B. K. et al. The peripheral immune landscape in a patient with myocarditis after the administration of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Mol. Cells 45, 738–748. https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2022.0031 (2022).
Hwang, N. et al. Single-cell sequencing of PBMC characterizes the altered transcriptomic landscape of classical monocytes in BNT162b2-induced myocarditis. Front. Immunol. 13, 979188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.979188 (2022).
Oikawa, T. et al. The role of Ets family transcription factor PU.1 in hematopoietic cell differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 6, 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400534 (1999).
Huber, R., Pietsch, D., Panterodt, T. & Brand, K. Regulation of C/EBPbeta and resulting functions in cells of the monocytic lineage. Cell Signal 24, 1287–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.02.007 (2012).
Tijchon, E., Havinga, J., van Leeuwen, F. N. & Scheijen, B. B-lineage transcription factors and cooperating gene lesions required for leukemia development. Leukemia 27, 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2012.293 (2013).
Hosokawa, H. & Rothenberg, E. V. How transcription factors drive choice of the T cell fate. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-00426-6 (2021).
Kallies, A. & Good-Jacobson, K. L. Transcription factor T-bet orchestrates lineage development and function in the immune system. Trends Immunol. 38, 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2017.02.003 (2017).
Abel, A. M., Yang, C., Thakar, M. S. & Malarkannan, S. Natural killer cells: Development, maturation, and clinical utilization. Front. Immunol. 9, 1869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01869 (2018).
Yan, F., Powell, D. R., Curtis, D. J. & Wong, N. C. From reads to insight: A hitchhiker’s guide to ATAC-seq data analysis. Genome Biol. 21, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-1929-3 (2020).
Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D. & Greenleaf, W. J. chromVAR: Inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data. Nat. Methods 14, 975–978. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4401 (2017).
Voon, D. C. C., Hor, Y. T. & Ito, Y. The RUNX complex: Reaching beyond haematopoiesis into immunity. Immunology 146, 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12535 (2015).
Brady, G., Whiteman, H. J., Spender, L. C. & Farrell, P. J. Downregulation of RUNX1 by RUNX3 requires the RUNX3 VWRPY sequence and is essential for Epstein-Barr virus-driven B-cell proliferation. J. Virol. 83, 6909–6916. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00216-09 (2009).
Gan, H., Hao, Q., Idell, S. & Tang, H. Transcription factor runx3 is induced by Influenza A virus and double-strand RNA and mediates airway epithelial cell apoptosis. Sci. Rep. 5, 17916. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17916 (2015).
Stock, M., Schafer, H., Fliegauf, M. & Otto, F. Identification of novel genes of the bone-specific transcription factor Runx2. J. Bone Miner. Res. 19, 959–972. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2004.19.6.959 (2004).
Levanon, D. et al. Transcription factor Runx3 regulates interleukin-15-dependent natural killer cell activation. Mol. Cell Biol. 34, 1158–1169. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01202-13 (2014).
Taniuchi, I. et al. Differential requirements for Runx proteins in CD4 repression and epigenetic silencing during T lymphocyte development. Cell 111, 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01111-x (2002).
Jefferies, C. A. Regulating IRFs in IFN driven disease. Front. Immunol. 10, 325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00325 (2019).
McNab, F., Mayer-Barber, K., Sher, A., Wack, A. & O’Garra, A. Type I interferons in infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3787 (2015).
Platanias, L. C. Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1604 (2005).
Eskandarian Boroujeni, M. et al. Dysregulated interferon response and immune hyperactivation in severe COVID-19: Targeting STATs as a novel therapeutic strategy. Front. Immunol. 13, 888897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.888897 (2022).
Hanzelmann, S., Castelo, R. & Guinney, J. GSVA: Gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinform. 14, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-7 (2013).
Li, C. et al. Mechanisms of innate and adaptive immunity to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine. Nat. Immunol. 23, 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-022-01163-9 (2022).
Schiebinger, G. et al. Optimal-transport analysis of single-cell gene expression identifies developmental trajectories in reprogramming. Cell 176, 1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.026 (2019).
Pliner, H. A. et al. Cicero predicts cis-regulatory DNA interactions from single-cell chromatin accessibility data. Mol. Cell 71, 858–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.044 (2018).
Haque, A., Engel, J., Teichmann, S. A. & Lonnberg, T. A practical guide to single-cell RNA-sequencing for biomedical research and clinical applications. Genome. Med. 9, 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-017-0467-4 (2017).
Lee, J. S. & Shin, E. C. The type I interferon response in COVID-19: Implications for treatment. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 585–586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-00429-3 (2020).
Sahin, U. et al. BNT162b2 vaccine induces neutralizing antibodies and poly-specific T cells in humans. Nature 595, 572–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03653-6 (2021).
Lagunas-Rangel, F. A. & Chavez-Valencia, V. High IL-6/IFN-gamma ratio could be associated with severe disease in COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 92, 1789–1790. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25900 (2020).
Ali, M. et al. COVID-19 and myocarditis: A review of literature. Egypt Heart J. 74, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-022-00260-2 (2022).
Ong, S., Rose, N. R. & Cihakova, D. Natural killer cells in inflammatory heart disease. Clin. Immunol. 175, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2016.11.010 (2017).
Liao, M. et al. Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 842–844. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0901-9 (2020).
Maucourant, C. et al. Natural killer cell immunotypes related to COVID-19 disease severity. Sci. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.abd6832 (2020).
de Cevins, C. et al. A monocyte/dendritic cell molecular signature of SARS-CoV-2-related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children with severe myocarditis. Med. (N. Y.) 2, 1072–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2021.08.002 (2021).
Zheng, G. X. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14049 (2017).
Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048 (2021).
Hafemeister, C. & Satija, R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. Genome. Biol. 20, 296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1874-1 (2019).
Linderman, G. C. et al. Zero-preserving imputation of single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Commun. 13, 192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27729-z (2022).
Satpathy, A. T. et al. Massively parallel single-cell chromatin landscapes of human immune cell development and intratumoral T cell exhaustion. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 925–936. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0206-z (2019).
Stuart, T., Srivastava, A., Madad, S., Lareau, C. A. & Satija, R. Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac. Nat. Methods 18, 1333–1341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01282-5 (2021).
Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0 (2019).
Yu, G., Wang, L. G. & He, Q. Y. ChIPseeker: An R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics 31, 2382–2383. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv145 (2015).
Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the financial support from the National Research Foundation (NRF-2021R1A2C2009749 and NRF-2018R1A5A2025079), the Korea Mouse Phenotyping Project (2013M3A9D5072550), the Korea Health Technology R&D Project (HR18C0012), and the Seok-San Biomedical Science Scholarship, Yonsei University College of Medicine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.K., H.-S.A., B.Y., and S.F. conducted most of the experiments and drafted the manuscript. S.B. designed the study. N.H., H.Y., and H.-K.L. were involved in the annotation of cell clusters by single-cell RNA sequencing analysis. K.S. and S.K. gathered patients’ clinical information. J-w.K. was involved in the conceptualization of the study. H.K., H.- S.A., B.Y., and S.F. were primarily involved in data collection, hypothesis development, and manuscript development. All authors have contributed to the manuscript and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H., Ahn, HS., Hwang, N. et al. Epigenomic landscape exhibits interferon signaling suppression in the patient of myocarditis after BNT162b2 vaccination. Sci Rep 13, 8926 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36070-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36070-y
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.