Abstract
Microwaves (MWs) are widely used for heating food, accelerating chemical reactions, drying materials, therapies, and so on. Water molecules absorb MWs and produce heat because of their substantial electric dipole moments. Recently, increasing attention has been paid to accelerating various catalytic reactions in water-containing porous materials using MW irradiation. Here, a critical question is whether water in nanoscale pores generates heat in the same way as liquid water. Is it valid that MW-heating behaviors of nanoconfined water are estimated solely by a dielectric constant of liquid water? There are almost no studies regarding this question. Here, we address it using reverse micellar (RM) solutions. Reverse micelles are water-containing nanoscale cages formed by self-assembled surfactant molecules in oil. We measured real-time temperature changes of liquid samples within a waveguide under MW irradiation at 2.45 GHz and at MW intensities of ~ 3 to ~ 12 W/cm2. We found that the heat production and its rate per unit volume of water in the RM solution are about one order of magnitude larger than those of liquid water at all the MW intensities examined. This indicates that water spots that are much hotter than liquid water under MW irradiation at the same intensity, are formed in the RM solution. Our findings will give fundamental information to develop effective and energy-saving chemical reactions in nanoscale reactors with water under MW irradiation, and to study MW effects on various aqueous mediums with nanoconfined water. Furthermore, the RM solution will serve as a platform to study the impact of nanoconfined water on MW-assisted reactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Microwaves (MWs) are commonly used for modern life. They are electromagnetic waves in the frequency range of 0.3–300 GHz, corresponding to wavelengths of 1 mm to 1 m. MW ovens heat food effectively. Mobile phones use wireless communication relying on MWs. Moreover, applications of MW heating in chemical synthesis have been rapidly spreading, for example, to achieve green chemistry1,2,3,4,5,6.
MW heating of water takes place because of substantial interaction between MWs and water. MW ovens mainly use this mechanism because food contains water. Microwave-accelerated homogeneous catalysis in water has significant advantages because of high yields for a short time, compared with conventional heating3,4,5. Water molecules move with the time-dependent oscillatory electric field of applied MWs, producing heat owing to viscous friction between water molecules. Although such a rough description is provided, it is challenging to specify molecular processes involved in the heat production7. One reason for this difficulty is that systems under continuous MW irradiation are in non-equilibrium states8.
MW heating of aqueous mediums with nanoconfined water, which are made naturally or artificially, is widely used in many disciplines. For example, catalytic reactions in porous materials with nanoconfined water under MW irradiation were extensively studied toward fast, green and efficient synthesis and toward removal of organic pollutants in water ecosystems9,10,11,12. Moreover, MW synthesis of single-crystal porous transition-metal nitrides demonstrated that hydrated metal oxides are a new class of MW absorbing media, suggesting that nanoscale lattice water in the sample plays a crucial role in MW heating of the samples13. Another example is MW irradiation of organisms14,15,16,17,18,19,20 and fresh foods21 with the aims of drying, thawing, microbial inactivation, therapy, and so on, where intracellular water is ubiquitously confined on the nanoscale owing to the so-called molecular crowding22. Here, a fundamental question is raised on whether nanoconfined water generates heat in the same way as liquid (bulk) water. It, however, has never been addressed, and hence, the response of nanoconfined water to MWs is regarded as merely that of a very small amount of water with a dielectric constant of liquid water. We address this question here using reverse micellar (RM) solutions.
A reverse micelle (also abbreviated as RM) is a nanoscale water droplet covered by a membrane of self-assembled surfactant molecules in a nonpolar (oil) solvent23, as displayed in Fig. 1. The RM size (nm–sub-µm) can be controlled by adjusting the water-to-surfactant molar ratio w0 (= [water]/[surfactant]), and it increases with w0. In addition, water-soluble molecules, such as dye and protein molecules, can be dissolved within RMs. Therefore, confinement effects on the structure24,25,26,27,28,29 and dynamics30,31,32,33,34,35,36 of water and on chemical and biochemical reactions24,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44 of molecules encapsulated have been extensively studied for several decades, mostly by using RMs with a surfactant of AOT [= bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate] because of their stability over a wide size range.
Results and discussion
Real-time changes in the temperatures of liquid samples measured by infrared thermography under MW irradiation are depicted in Fig. 1, where the experimental conditions were the same for all the samples. These results were confirmed by repeating the measurements at least a few times. The temperature (black line) of water substantially increases with time and reaches the stationary state at ~ 42 °C owing to being balanced against the heat dissipation to the external atmosphere. On the contrary, oil of isooctane does not show an increase in the temperature (green line), which is because isooctane is a non-polar molecule and has almost no interaction with the MW. Moreover, the temperature (blue line) of a sample of RM solution without water (w0 = 0) increases slightly by ~ 1 °C, where RMs are dispersed in oil, as schematically displayed in Fig. 1. A dramatic change in the temperature (red line) is obtained if a small amount of water [volume fraction (VF) of 0.025] is added to the RM solution without water, where the RM size grows from ~ 3 nm at w0 = 0 to ~ 5 nm at w0 = 725,26. The temperature attains to ~ 37.5 °C, which is comparable with that of the sample of water. Here, the temperature recorded for the sample of RM solution with water is attributed to averaging the temperatures of water-containing RMs which absorb MWs and of the oil medium which is transparent to MWs. For comparison, the measurement was made for water (VF of 0.025) in isooctane (red purple line), where a water droplet was located at the bottom of the sample cell owing to phase separation with the oil. As described in Sect. 3 of SI, it was found that the temperatures hardly depend on the positions at which they are recorded, because of the small dimensions of the liquid sample. This also holds true for the sample of water in oil, in which the spatial distribution of water is not uniform. This sample contains the same amount of water as that in the RM solution with water, but displays almost no change in the temperature. This is understood by considering that the whole liquid is not heated by the small amount of water absorbing the MW. The result of RM solution with water is in marked contrast to this result.
The heat productions of samples of water and RM solution with water can be roughly estimated by specific heats of water and isooctane, 4.18 Jg−1 K−1 and 2.12 Jg−1 K−1, respectively, which do not so much vary in this small temperature range. In addition, the specific heat of isooctane is used for that of the RM solution containing isooctane with VF of ~ 0.9. The heat production of the sample of water is ~ 14.6 J for temperature change from 24.5 to 42 °C. On the other hand, it due to water in the RM solution is ~ 3.5 J from 25.5 to 37.5 °C, by using a density of 0.69 g/ml for isooctane, and by taking account of increase (~ 1 °C) in temperature due to the surfactant. The heat production of water in the RM solution is about one fourth of that of liquid water, whereas the amount of water in the RM solution is only ~ 2.5% of the sample of water. This indicates that the heat production per unit volume of water in the RM solution is about ten times larger than in liquid water. This highly effective MW heating of water in RM solution was further examined with changing the MW intensity, as described below.
Real-time changes in the temperatures for samples of water and of RM solution with water at three MW intensities are depicted in Fig. 2a,b, respectively. These results were confirmed by repeating the measurements three times. It is found that the temperatures in the stationary states increase with raising the MW intensity for the two samples. Heat production due to water of 0.2 ml, which was the volume of the sample, is calculated at the three MW intensities in the same way as in the preceding paragraph, whereas it for the RM solution is obtained by dividing the heat production thus calculated by 0.025 (VF of water). Moreover, the temperatures in the stationary states were corrected for the difference between the temperatures of the liquid sample and by the thermographic camera (see SI), although this correction does not have much effect on the following conclusions. The results are displayed in Fig. 2c. It is found from the straight lines in Fig. 2c that the heat production of water in the RM solution is proportional to the MW intensity, and is much larger than that of liquid water at the same MW intensity. That is, the ratios are ~ 9 at 3 W/cm2, ~ 9 at 6 W/cm2 and ~ 10 at 12 W/cm2, and the ratio between the slopes of the two lines is ~ 10. Thus, the heat production per unit volume of water in the RM solution is roughly ten times larger than in liquid water at the same MW intensity.
The heat production rates are next estimated and compared between liquid water and water in the RM solution. The heat production rate is balanced against the heat dissipation rate in the stationary state, and hence the former is obtained as the value of the latter. The heat dissipation rate in the stationary state will be roughly estimated by the derivative value at the time when the MW is turned off. This is described in Fig. 3a,b for water and RM solution with water, respectively. These figures display the temperatures descending from the stationary states owing to turning off the MW irradiation. The slope of the straight line corresponds to the derivative value (\({dT}_{-}/dt\)). Moreover, by assuming that the time profile measured by the thermographic camera represents the real-time temperature change of the sample, the heat dissipation rate is obtained as the derivative value multiplied by the heat capacity of the liquid sample, where the heat capacity is calculated in the same way as in derivation of the heat production. The heat production rates (W/0.2-ml water) for water (squares) and for the RM solution (circles) are plotted as a function of the MW intensity in Fig. 3c. It is found from Fig. 3c that the heat production rate of water in the RM solution is proportional to the MW intensity, and is much larger than that of liquid water at the same MW intensity. That is, the ratios are ~ 12 at 3 W/cm2, ~ 12 at 6 W/cm2 and ~ 14 at 12 W/cm2, and the ratio between the slopes of the two lines is ~ 13. Thus, the heat production rate per unit volume of water in the RM solution is over ten times larger than that in liquid water at the same MW intensity.
There are many studies on water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions with MW irradiation45,46,47,48. These studies focus mainly on exploring effective separation of water from crude oil through the process of demulsification of W/O emulsions by MWs. However, the volume fractions (~ 0.2 to ~ 0.5) of water in those emulsions are much higher than that (~ 0.025) of the RM solution examined here, and the sizes of water droplets are in the micrometer range. Furthermore, there are no studies reporting unusual MW heating in those emulsions.
This unusual MW heating observed in RM solution with water is not explained by a dielectric loss of the sample. The heat production rate is usually regarded to be proportional to a dielectric loss, corresponding to the imaginary part \({\varepsilon }^{{\prime\prime}}\) of complex permittivity of a material49. The value of \({\varepsilon }^{{\prime\prime}}\) at 2.45 GHz and at room temperature is ~ 11 for water50, whereas it is ~ 0.05 for AOT RM solutions with a volume fraction of 0.1 and at w0 = 5 or 1032. These values of volume fraction and w0 are close to those (VF ~ 0.1, w0 = 7) of the RM solution examined in the present study, and hence, its \({\varepsilon }^{{\prime\prime}}\)-value will also be close to that value. The very small permittivity of the RM solutions is regarded to be largely due to a low amount of water, and the ratio of \({\varepsilon }^{{\prime\prime}}\) value of the RM solution to liquid water is ~ 5 × 10−3. Thus, the \({\varepsilon }^{{\prime\prime}}\) value does not lead to an anomalous increase in the heat production rate obtained in the RM solution.
This unusual MW heating of the RM solution may be attributed to the following two considerations. One is an increase in the dielectric loss of the RM solution under MW irradiation. It is noteworthy that the permittivity is usually measured by a weak and perturbative MW irradiation, which allows us to observe materials in the thermal equilibrium and to obtain linear responses to external electric fields. On the contrary, a nonlinear response may emerge under strong MW irradiation that makes a system heated. For example, changes in the arrangement of water molecules may be induced, leading to a long-scale dynamic correlation over water molecules in the RM, which may help to sustain such a correlation owing to nanoconfinement. As a result, a growth of a dipole moment, which is ascribed to the correlation between the dipole moments of water molecules, may cause an increase in the dielectric loss of the RM solution. The other is Fresnel reflection of the MW at the interfaces51,52. The refractive indices of water, isooctane and quartz glass at 2.45 GHz are ~ 8.8, ~ 1.4, and ~ 1.9, respectively. The electromagnetic wave propagating from a medium with a large refractive index to that with a small one shows a total reflection at the interface. Therefore, the MW at 2.45 GHz will exhibit multiple reflections in water, reflected at the interfaces between water and glass for the sample of water, and between water and isooctane for the RM solution. The reflected MW will increase the total MW heating. Such enhancement may be a key factor for the unusual MW heating of RM solution with water. There are, however, theoretical challenges for clarifying it. The questions are, for example, how the MW is repeatedly reflected in the nanosized water, and how the water generates heat by the reflected MW. Multiphysics simulations of electromagnetic fields and heat transfer53 will be required to address these questions, and molecular dynamics simulations will need to be combined to examine it on the molecular level8.
It is considered that the RMs with water neither collapse nor form aggregates under MW irradiation, as described in SI. Therefore, nanoconfined water in the RM will be responsible for the dramatic increase in the temperature with MW irradiation, by taking account of the fact that this phenomenon is not observed for the RM without water.
Our findings show that water in RM solution exhibits significantly more effective MW heating than liquid water, and so becomes a hot spot. The temperatures of the RM solutions measured on the macroscopic scale under MW irradiation are moderate, at most ~ 38 °C. Thus, this study may provide a new aspect for understanding responses of various aqueous mediums with nanoconfined water, such as organisms and foods, to MW irradiation. For example, much attention has been paid to biological effects due to MW irradiation14,15,16,17,18,19,20. Non-thermal effects are often proposed for explaining phenomena such as changes in microorganisms’ activities14,15,16,17 and in cell membrane permeabilities18. Here, the temperatures of systems examined are controlled at given constant temperatures under MW irradiations. This experimental procedure is believed to validate the assumption that the MW effect is not due to heating. This occurrence, however, is not simple if there are hot spots, because the local excess heating may cause those biological effects. Furthermore, RM solution will allow us to study the impact of nanoconfined water on MW-assisted reactions because the chemical and biomolecular reactions can be examined in RMs24,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44. Here, there are two advantages. One is in controlling their size, and the other is that oil solvents for RM solution are transparent to MWs.
Methods
MW heating experiment
The experimental setup for MW heating is depicted in Fig. 4. A semiconductor microwave generator was used as a MW source at 2.45 GHz. The microwave was led to a waveguide with 27 × 96-mm2 cross-section from the MW generator through a coaxial waveguide transducer. This waveguide setup was constructed for a traveling wave mode, and a dummy load, which was coupled to a water-flow chiller, was put at the termination so that the MW passing through the sample can be dumped. The MW power dependence was measured at 75 W, 150 W, and 300 W, corresponding to 3 W/cm2, 6 W/cm2, and 12 W/cm2 on average, respectively; here, we note that most of the MW power applied was not used for heating liquid samples owing to their small dimensions.
A cylindrical quartz cell with 6-mm inner diameter was inserted into the waveguide through a hole in the top surface of the waveguide for heating liquid samples, and was set at the same position within the waveguide for all the samples by using a three-axes stage. Moreover, the sample cell was rotated at 700 rpm by a brushless motor, which was connected with the three-axes stage by a bracket, so that the sample can be uniformly heated. Nevertheless, almost no difference of the MW-heating behaviors was observed between the samples with and without the rotation of cell. This is because a penetration depth, which is defined as the distance from the surface of the material at which the power drops to \({e}^{-1}\) from its value at the surface, was larger than the inner diameter of the sample cell; as for liquid water, the penetration depth is ~ 15 mm49, and it is much larger for isooctane. The amounts of the liquid samples were 0.2 ml. An infrared thermographic camera (Optris, Germany) was used for temperature measurements of the liquid samples through a window in the side surface of the waveguide. The temperature was measured at the center of the liquid sample, as seen in Fig. 5, where the measured area was ~ 1 × 1 mm2. It was found that the temperatures hardly depend on the positions at which the temperatures are recorded, because of the small dimensions of the liquid samples (see Sec.3 in SI).
Samples
Sample preparation of RM solution was described in detail elsewhere29,36. AOT [= bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate] (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), isooctane (Wako, Japan), and sterile Millipore-filtered water (Yamato, Japan) were used for a surfactant, oil and water, respectively. Isooctane is widely used to prepare stable AOT reverse micellar solutions over a wide RM size range. Moreover, its boiling point is ~ 99 °C, which is almost the same as that of water, at ambient conditions, and much higher than the temperature range examined. It is necessary to avoid boiling of RM solutions under MW heating.
The volume fractions of RMs with/without water were less than ~ 0.1 in the present study. Based on the previous studies25,27,33, this indicates that the RMs are homogeneously and separately distributed in the RM solutions, that is, each RM is thought to react to MWs.
A surfactant of AOT has an anionic hydrophilic head group, and its counter ion is a sodium cation. It is considered that the sodium cation does not contribute to MW heating of the RM solution examined, because the conductivity loss due to that cation is not observed for AOT reverse micellar solutions in the frequency range above ~ 0.01 GHz32.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Adam, D. Microwave chemistry: Out of the kitchen. Nature 421, 571–572 (2003).
Török, B. & Schäfer, C. (eds.) Nontraditional Activation Methods in Green and Sustainable Applications (Elsevier, 2021).
Kappe, C. O. et al. (eds.) Microwaves in Organic and Medicinal Chemistry (Wiley-VCH, 2012).
Leadbeater, N. E. (ed.) Microwave Heating as a Tool for Sustainable Chemistry (CRC Press, 2010).
Odell, L. R. & Larhed, M. Microwave-accelerated homogeneous catalysis in water. In Green Catalysis, vol. 1: Homogeneous Catalysis, Chap.4 (ed. Crabtree, R. H.) 79 (WILEY-VCH, 2009).
Kingston, H. M. & Haswell, S. J. (eds.) Microwave-Enhanced Chemistry: Fundamentals, Sample Preparation, and Applications (American Chemical Society, 1997).
Lunkenheimer, P. et al. Electromagnetic-radiation absorption by water. Phys. Rev. E 96, 062607 (2017).
Futera, Z. & English, N. J. Influence of external static and alternating electric fields on water from long-time non-equilibrium ab initio molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 147, 031102 (2017).
Qi, Y., Zuo, Q., Mei, Y., Yao, T. & Wu, J. Porous NiCo2O4 sheet catalysts for the microwave-assisted Fenton reaction. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3, 7152–7160 (2020).
Jacob, K., Stolle, A., Ondruschka, B., Jandt, K. D. & Keller, T. F. Cu on porous glass: An easily recyclable catalyst for the microwave-assisted azide–alkyne cycloaddition in water. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 451, 94–100 (2013).
Freitag, J. et al. Microwave assisted synthesis using catalysts on controlled pore glass carriers. Opt. Appl. 35, 745–752 (2005).
Muley, P. D., Nandakumar, K. & Boldor, D. Numerical modelling of microwave heating of a porous catalyst bed. J. Microw. Power Electromagn. Energy 53, 24–47 (2019).
Liu, D. et al. General microwave route to single-crystal porous transition metal nitrides for highly sensitive and stable Raman scattering substrates. Nano Lett. 21, 7724–7731 (2021).
Webb, S. J. & Booth, A. D. Absorption of microwaves by microorganisms. Nature 222, 1199–1200 (1969).
Roy, I. & Gupta, M. N. Applications of microwaves in biological sciences. Curr. Sci. 85, 1685 (2003).
Shamis, Y., Croft, R., Taube, A., Crawford, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. Review of the specific effects of microwave radiation on bacterial cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 96, 319–325 (2012).
Banik, S., Bandyopadhyay, S. & Ganguly, S. Bioeffects of microwave: A brief review. Bioresour. Technol. 87, 155–159 (2003).
Mazinani, S. A., Stuart, J. A. & Yan, H. Microwave-assisted delivery of an anticancer drug to cancer cells. RSC Adv. 8, 31465 (2018).
Perera, P. G. T. et al. Exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic field triggers rapid uptake of large nanosphere clusters by pheochromocytoma cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 13, 8429–8442 (2018).
Motomura, T. et al. Evaluation of systemic external microwave hyperthermia for treatment of pleural metastasis in orthotopic lung cancer model. Oncol. Rep. 24, 591–598 (2010).
Regier, M. et al. (eds.) The Microwave Processing of Foods (Woodhead Publishing, 2017).
Rivas, G. & Minton, A. P. Macromolecular crowding in vitro, in vivo, and in between. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 970 (2016).
Luisi, P. L. & Straub, B. E. (eds.) Reverse Micelles (Plenum Press, 1984).
Pileni, M. P. (ed.) Structure and Reactivity in Reverse Micelles (Elsevier, 1989).
Amararene, A. et al. Adiabatic compressibility of AOT [sodium bis.2-ethylhexyl.sulfosuccinate] reverse micelles: Analysis of a simple model based on micellar size and volumetric measurements. Phys. Rev. E 61, 682 (2000).
Kotlarchyk, M., Huang, J. S. & Chen, S.-H. Structure of AOT reversed micelles determined by small-angle neutron scattering. J. Phys. Chem. 89, 4382–4386 (1985).
Dijk, M. A. V., Joosten, J. G. H., Levine, Y. K. & Bedeaux, D. Dielectric study of temperature-dependent aerosol OT/water/isooctane microemulsion structure. J. Phys. Chem. 93, 2506–2512 (1989).
Onori, G. & Santucci, A. IR investigations of water structure in Aerosol OT reverse micellar aggregates. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 5430 (1993).
Murakami, H., Nishi, T. & Toyota, Y. Determination of structural parameters of protein-containing reverse micellar solution by near-infrared absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 5877 (2011).
Levinger, N. E. Water in confinement. Science 298, 1722 (2002).
Thompson, W. H. Perspective: Dynamics of confined liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 149, 170901 (2018).
D’Angelo, M., Fioretto, D., Onori, G., Palmieri, L. & Santucci, A. High-frequency dielectric properties of aerosol sodium bis-2-ethyl-hexylsulfosuccinate (AOT)-H2O-CCl4 systems in the reversed micellar phase. Phys. Rev. E 52, 4620 (1995).
Spehr, T. L., Frick, B., Zamponicd, M. & Stühn, B. Dynamics of water confined to reverse AOT micelles. Soft Matter 7, 5745 (2011).
Dokter, A. M., Woutersen, S. & Bakker, H. J. Anomalous slowing down of the vibrational relaxation of liquid water upon nanoscale confinement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 178301 (2005).
Moilanen, D. E., Fenn, E. E., Wong, D. & Fayer, M. D. Water dynamics at the interface in AOT reverse micelles. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 8560 (2009).
Murakami, H. Terahertz dynamics of water before and after water shedding from reverse micelles. J. Mol. Liq. 210, 37–43 (2015).
Dutt, G. B. Fluorescence anisotropy of ionic probes in AOT reverse micelles: Influence of water droplet size and electrostatic interactions on probe dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 7220 (2008).
Riter, R. E., Willard, D. M. & Levinger, N. E. Water immobilization at surfactant interfaces in reverse micelles. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 2705 (1998).
Eskici, G. & Axelsen, P. H. Amyloid beta peptide folding in reverse micelles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 9566–9575 (2017).
Van Horn, W. D., Ogilvie, M. E. & Flynn, P. F. Reverse micelle encapsulation as a model for intracellular crowding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 8030 (2009).
Bhattarai, A. & Wilczura-Wachnik, H. Interaction between morin and AOT reversed micelles—Studies with UV–vis at 25 ℃. Int. J. Pharm. 461, 14–21 (2014).
Murakami, H. Persistent optical hole-burning spectroscopy of nano-confined dye molecules in liquid at room temperature: Spectral narrowing due to a glassy state and extraordinary relaxation in a nano-cage. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 144505 (2018).
Murakami, H. Protein and water confined in nanometer-scale reverse micelles studied by near infrared, terahertz, and ultrafast visible spectroscopies. In Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology, vol. 93, Biomolecular Spectroscopy: Advances from Integrating Experiments and Theory, Chap.6 (ed. Christov, C. Z.) 183 (Academic press, 2013).
Murakami, H. Terahertz waveform measurements using a chirped optical pulse and terahertz spectroscopy of reverse micellar solution: Towards time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy of protein in water. In Terahertz Spectroscopy—A Cutting Edge Technology, Chap.8 (ed. Uddin, J.) 143 (Intech, 2017).
Fang, C. S. & Lai, P. M. C. Microwave heating and separation of water-in-oil emulsions. J. Microw. Power Electromagn. Energy 30, 46–57 (1995).
Fortuny, M. et al. Effect of salinity, temperature, water content, and pH on the microwave demulsification of crude oil emulsions. Energy Fuels 21, 1358–1364 (2007).
Chan, C.-C. & Chen, Y.-C. Demulsification of W/O emulsions by microwave radiation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 37, 3407–3420 (2002).
Abdurahman, N. H., Yunus, R. M., Azhari, N. H., Said, N. & Hassan, Z. The potential of microwave heating in separating water-in-oil (w/o) emulsions. Energy Procedia 138, 1023–1028 (2017).
Metaxas, A. C. & Meredith, R. J. Industrial Microwave Heating, Chap.2, and Chap.4 78 (Peter Peregrinus Ltd., 1988).
Ellison, W. J., Lamkaouchi, K. & Moreau, J.-M. Water: A dielectric reference. J. Mol. Liq. 68, 171–279 (1996).
Luhn, S. & Hentschel, M. Analytical Fresnel laws for curved dielectric interfaces. J. Opt. 22, 015605 (2020).
Hentschel, M. & Richter, K. Quantum chaos in optical systems: The annular billiard. Phys. Rev. E 66, 056207 (2002).
De Bruyn, M. et al. Subtle microwave-induced overheating effects in an industrial demethylation reaction and their direct use in the development of an innovative microwave reactor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 5431–5436 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. J. Sugiyama for fruitful discussions, and Dr. M. Adachi for comments on the manuscript. This work was partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Kakenhi) (Grant No. 26600017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.M. conceived the idea, conducted the experiments and data analysis, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Murakami, H. Unusual microwave heating of water in reverse micellar solution. Sci Rep 13, 5025 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31742-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31742-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.